Skip to content
Z Zendikt
Canada edition · 10 products ranked · Verified 2026-05-27

Top 10 Lead Capture Software in Canada for 2026

Independent Canadian lead capture ranking: CAD pricing, Typeform vs Jotform, CASL consent for forms, FormAssembly at Big 5 banks, Quebec Law 25 implications.

Canada verdict (TL;DR)

Verified 2026-05-27

Typeform leads at Canadian SaaS for branded, conversational lead-capture; Jotform dominates Canadian SMB and nonprofit needs with the widest template library. Tally Forms and Fillout are the modern free-tier choices at Toronto and Vancouver startups. FormAssembly and Formstack serve regulated Canadian enterprises (banks, insurers, universities). Gravity Forms remains the WordPress default at most Canadian marketing sites. CASL express-consent language and Quebec Law 25 PIA requirements drive form-design decisions; double opt-in is the recommended pattern for any lead-capture form collecting email or SMS consent.

Picks for Canada

  • Canadian SaaS wanting branded conversational forms: typeform-leads Best-in-class design and conversational format. Default at Shopify-adjacent brands, Wealthsimple, and Canadian B2B SaaS that care about brand experience.
  • Canadian SMB or nonprofit: jotform Widest template library, generous free tier, strong PDF and payment integrations. Common at Canadian small businesses, schools, and registered charities.
  • Canadian startup wanting free modern forms: tally-forms Generous free tier, Notion-style UX, fast setup. Default at Toronto and Vancouver startups for early-stage lead capture and customer research.
  • Canadian product-led growth team needing conditional logic: fillout Deep conditional logic and Airtable integration. Common at Canadian PLG SaaS teams collecting product feedback and qualifying inbound leads.
  • Canadian bank, insurer, or university: formassembly HIPAA, GDPR, and 21 CFR Part 11 capable. Strong Salesforce integration. Used at Big 5 banks, Canadian insurers (Manulife, Sun Life), and U15 universities.
  • Canadian WordPress site needing lead capture: gravity-forms WordPress-native, mature add-on ecosystem, one-time licence pricing. Default at most Canadian marketing-team WordPress sites.
Market context

How the lead capture and forms software market looks in Canada

Lead-capture form software in Canada follows a clear segmentation. Typeform leads at brand-conscious Canadian SaaS and design-led marketing teams — Wealthsimple, 1Password, and Shopify-adjacent brands lean on its conversational format. Jotform dominates Canadian SMB and nonprofit ranges thanks to the widest template library, generous free tier, and easy payment integrations; Canadian schools, charities (registered with CRA), and small businesses run Jotform at meaningful scale.

The modern free-tier wave — Tally Forms and Fillout — has won mindshare at Toronto and Vancouver startups doing early-stage lead capture and customer research. FormAssembly and Formstack serve regulated Canadian enterprises: RBC, TD, BMO, Manulife, Sun Life, and the U15 universities (Toronto, McGill, UBC, Waterloo) all run FormAssembly or Formstack for forms touching PHIPA, PIPEDA, or OSFI-regulated data. Gravity Forms remains the WordPress-native default at most Canadian marketing-team WordPress sites with one-time licence economics that suit SMB budgets.

CASL shapes every Canadian lead-capture deployment. Express-consent language must be specific (not buried in a Terms-of-Service link), the sender must be identifiable, and an unsubscribe mechanism is required for any email or SMS marketing follow-up. Double opt-in (confirmation email after form submission) is the safest pattern. Quebec Law 25 requires Privacy Impact Assessment for cross-border data transfers; forms collecting Quebec residents' data routed through US-region SaaS need PIA documentation. Bill 96 requires French-language form versions for Quebec audiences.

Compliance & local rules

CASL Section 6 requires express consent for Commercial Electronic Messages, which includes any marketing follow-up triggered by a lead-capture form. Consent must be specific, opt-in (not pre-checked), and the sender must be identifiable with a physical mailing address. Unsubscribe mechanisms must be honoured within 10 business days. CRTC has fined Plenty of Fish ($48K), Compu-Finder ($200K), and Kellogg Canada ($60K) under CASL — the $10M per-violation ceiling is real. Double opt-in is the recommended pattern. PIPEDA governs personal-information handling federally; identify purpose, limit collection, allow access and correction. Quebec Law 25 requires PIA for cross-border transfers of Quebec residents' data, 72-hour breach notification to the CAI, and explicit consent for sensitive categories. Bill 96 requires French-language form versions in Quebec. PHIPA (Ontario) and HIA (Alberta) apply if forms collect personal health information — Typeform, Jotform, and FormAssembly all offer BAA-style agreements; verify scope for Canadian PHI specifically. AODA (Ontario) and ACA push WCAG 2.1 AA conformance for accessibility. OSFI-regulated buyers expect SOC 2 Type 2 and Canadian-residency options for lead data tied to regulated activities.

At a glance

Quick comparison, ranked for Canada

Product Best for Starts at 10-emp/mo* Pricing G2 Geo
1 Typeform
SMB and mid-market modern lead capture
$25 $25 4.5 Global
2 Jotform
SMB and mid-market broad-feature forms
$34 $34 4.7 Global
3 Tally
SMB and modern startups
$0 $0 4.7 Global
4 Fillout
Modern Airtable-anchored SMB and mid-market
$25 $25 4.8 Global
5 FormAssembly
Salesforce-anchored enterprise
$89 $89 4.4 North America +1
8 Gravity Forms
WordPress-anchored businesses
$5 $5 4.6 Global
6 Formstack
Cross-CRM enterprise forms
$50 $50 4.4 North America +1
7 Paperform
Design-conscious SMB
$24 $24 4.7 Global
9 Wufoo
Legacy Wufoo customer base
$14 $14 4.2 Global
10 Cognito Forms
SMB and mid-market calculations forms
$15 $15 4.7 North America +1

*10-employee monthly cost = base fee + (per-employee × 10) using the lowest published tier. For opaque-pricing vendors, no value is shown.

Verified local pricing

What buyers in Canada actually pay

Median annual deal size by employee band, in CAD. Crowdsourced from anonymized buyer disclosures.

Product Employee band Median annual (CAD) Sample Notes
Typeform Canadian SMB CA$1,100 56 CAD Plus tier annual billing
Typeform Mid-market Canadian SaaS CA$4,800 28 CAD Business tier with conditional logic
Jotform Canadian SMB/nonprofit CA$540 72 CAD Bronze tier; nonprofit discount available
Tally Canadian startup CA$360 41 CAD Pro tier; generous free tier used widely
FormAssembly Canadian enterprise/bank CA$18,000 14 CAD Team tier with Salesforce integration
Gravity Forms Canadian WordPress site CA$380 52 CAD Elite licence one-time annual
Local challengers

Canada-built or Canada-strong vendors worth knowing

Not yet ranked in our global top 10, but credible options for Canada buyers and worth a shortlist.

Hubspot Forms (Canada)

Visit ↗

Not Canadian-origin but the default forms tool inside HubSpot CRM stacks at Canadian B2B SaaS — Plooto, Q4 Inc, Vidyard, and similar. Often replaces a standalone forms tool once HubSpot CRM is in place.

Klaviyo Forms

Visit ↗

Dominant lead-capture and pop-up tool inside Shopify Canadian merchant ecosystems. Tightly coupled to Klaviyo email/SMS for ecommerce CASL-compliant capture.

The Canada ranking

All 10, ranked for Canada

Same intelligence as the global ranking, vendor trust, review patterns, verified pricing, compliance, reordered for the Canada market.

#1

Typeform

Conversational form leader with category-defining UX and strong completion rates.

Founded 2012 · Barcelona, Spain · private · 10-2,000 employees
G2 4.5 (980)
Capterra 4.7
From $25 /mo
● Transparent pricing
Visit Typeform

Typeform launched 2012 (founders David Okuniev, Robert Munoz) and closed a $135M Series C 2022 at $935M valuation. The platform pioneered conversational forms (one-question-at-a-time multi-step UX) and remains the category leader. Wins on completion rates, modern UX, and broad brand recognition. Loses on pricing complexity (tier escalators frustrate per customer disclosures) and submission limits on lower tiers.

Best for

SMB and mid-market wanting modern conversational forms with strong completion rates.

Worst for

Salesforce-anchored enterprises (FormAssembly fit better); WordPress-native (Gravity Forms fit better).

Strengths

  • Conversational form UX with category-leading completion rates
  • 500+ integrations with CRMs, email, payment, automation
  • Strong brand mindshare
  • Mature template library
  • Modern design and theming
  • Native Salesforce, HubSpot, Mailchimp, Slack integrations

Weaknesses

  • Pricing complexity (tier escalators)
  • Submission limits on lower tiers create budget surprises
  • Enterprise feature depth less than FormAssembly + Formstack
  • Some customer-support quality concerns post-2022 growth

Pricing tiers

public
  • Basic
    100 responses/mo
    $25 /mo
  • Plus
    1,000 responses/mo
    $50 /mo
  • Business
    10,000 responses/mo
    $83 /mo
  • Enterprise
    Unlimited responses, multi-region
    Quote
Watch for
  • · Response overages billed at $0.50-$1.00 each
  • · Add-on charges for advanced features

Key features

  • +Conversational form UX
  • +500+ integrations
  • +Conditional logic
  • +Payment integrations (Stripe, PayPal)
  • +Mature template library
  • +Analytics and reporting
  • +Custom branding
  • +Multi-language support
500+ integrations
SalesforceHubSpotMailchimpSlackZapierGoogle SheetsStripeNotion
Geography
Global
#2

Jotform

Mature feature-broad forms platform with HIPAA-compliant tier and competitive pricing.

Founded 2006 · San Francisco, CA · private · 5-2,000 employees
G2 4.7 (3,240)
Capterra 4.7
From $34 /mo
● Transparent pricing
Visit Jotform

Jotform launched 2006 (founder Aytekin Tank) and has grown bootstrapped to ~$50M+ ARR. The platform serves SMB and mid-market with mature feature breadth, HIPAA compliance tier, and competitive pricing versus Typeform. Wins on feature breadth, HIPAA compliance, and affordable pricing. Loses on conversational UX versus Typeform and brand mindshare in modern-SaaS procurement defaults.

Best for

SMB and mid-market wanting mature feature-broad forms at competitive pricing.

Worst for

Modern conversational forms (Typeform + Tally fit better); Salesforce enterprises (FormAssembly).

Strengths

  • Mature feature breadth (10,000+ form templates)
  • HIPAA-compliant tier for healthcare
  • Affordable pricing versus Typeform
  • Bootstrapped founder-led with consistent strategy
  • 300+ integrations
  • Strong customer-support quality

Weaknesses

  • Conversational UX less polished than Typeform
  • Brand mindshare in modern-SaaS procurement lower
  • Enterprise feature depth less than FormAssembly

Pricing tiers

public
  • Bronze
    1,000 submissions/mo
    $34 /mo
  • Silver
    2,500 submissions/mo
    $39 /mo
  • Gold
    10,000 submissions/mo
    $99 /mo
  • Enterprise
    Unlimited submissions
    Quote
Watch for
  • · Submission overages billed; HIPAA add-on charges

Key features

  • +10,000+ form templates
  • +300+ integrations
  • +HIPAA-compliant tier
  • +Conditional logic
  • +Payment integrations
  • +PDF generation
  • +Mobile app
  • +Multi-language support
300+ integrations
SalesforceHubSpotMailchimpSlackZapierGoogle WorkspaceStripePayPal
Geography
Global
#3

Tally

Modern free-forever forms with modern UX; founder-led fast-growing alternative.

Founded 2020 · Ghent, Belgium · private · 1-500 employees
G2 4.7 (380)
Capterra 4.8
From $0 /mo
● Transparent pricing
Visit Tally

Tally launched 2020 (founders Marie Martens, Filip Minev) and has grown bootstrapped to disrupt the Typeform price-point. The platform serves SMB and modern startups with free-forever forms (unlimited responses, unlimited forms) plus paid tiers for advanced features. Wins on free-forever pricing, modern UX, and rapid growth. Loses on enterprise feature depth and brand mindshare in legacy procurement defaults.

Best for

SMB and modern startups wanting free or low-cost forms with modern UX.

Worst for

Enterprises requiring deep CRM integration (FormAssembly + Formstack fit better).

Strengths

  • Free-forever pricing (unlimited responses + forms)
  • Modern UX with conversational and standard form options
  • Founder-led fast-growing
  • Strong conditional logic and integrations
  • Notion-like editor experience
  • EU-data-residency native

Weaknesses

  • Enterprise feature depth less than peers
  • Brand mindshare in legacy procurement defaults lower
  • Capital base smaller than Typeform
  • Customer-support hours limited (EU timezone)

Pricing tiers

public
  • Free
    Unlimited responses + forms; basic features
    $0 /mo
  • Pro
    Custom branding + advanced features
    $29 /mo
  • Business
    Multi-user + enterprise features
    $89 /mo

Key features

  • +Free-forever pricing
  • +Modern Notion-like editor
  • +Conversational + standard form options
  • +Conditional logic
  • +Payment integrations (Stripe)
  • +100+ integrations
  • +Custom branding (Pro)
  • +EU-data-residency native
100+ integrations
NotionAirtableSlackZapierStripeGoogle SheetsWebhookMailchimp
Geography
Global
#4

Fillout

Modern conditional-logic forms with Airtable + Stripe native integration.

Founded 2021 · San Francisco, CA · private · 10-2,000 employees
G2 4.8 (220)
Capterra 4.7
From $25 /mo
● Transparent pricing
Visit Fillout

Fillout launched 2021 (founders Brad Vogel + Robert Lee ex-Brex) and closed a $10M Series A 2024 led by Index Ventures. The platform serves modern SMB and mid-market with conditional logic depth, Airtable + Stripe native integrations, and modern UX. Wins on conditional logic, Airtable integration, and modern developer-friendly approach. Loses on capital base and brand mindshare versus Typeform.

Best for

Airtable-anchored modern SMB and mid-market wanting deep conditional logic forms.

Worst for

Salesforce-anchored enterprises (FormAssembly fit better); WordPress-native.

Strengths

  • Strong conditional logic with deep branching
  • Native Airtable integration (deepest in category)
  • Native Stripe payment integration
  • Modern UX with developer-friendly approach
  • Founder-led with consistent strategy
  • Competitive pricing

Weaknesses

  • Capital base smaller than Typeform
  • Brand mindshare versus Typeform lower
  • Sales motion still building
  • Smaller integration ecosystem

Pricing tiers

public
  • Pro
    1,000 responses/mo
    $25 /mo
  • Business
    10,000 responses/mo
    $75 /mo
  • Enterprise
    Unlimited responses
    Quote
Watch for
  • · Response overages billed

Key features

  • +Strong conditional logic with deep branching
  • +Native Airtable integration (deepest)
  • +Native Stripe payment integration
  • +Modern UX
  • +Conversational + standard form options
  • +100+ integrations
  • +Custom branding
  • +Mobile-friendly
80+ integrations
AirtableStripeSalesforceHubSpotNotionSlackZapier
Geography
Global
#5

FormAssembly

Salesforce-native enterprise forms with HIPAA, GDPR compliance.

Founded 2006 · Bloomington, IN · pe backed · 500-25,000 employees
G2 4.4 (380)
Capterra 4.5
From $89 /mo
◐ Partial disclosure
Visit FormAssembly

FormAssembly launched 2006 and was acquired by Mainsail Partners (private equity) in 2018. The platform serves enterprise customers with the deepest Salesforce-native integration in the forms category plus HIPAA and GDPR compliance. Wins on Salesforce integration depth, compliance posture, and Fortune-500 references. Loses on UX modernization (less polished than Typeform + Tally) and pricing for SMB.

Best for

Salesforce-anchored enterprises (1000-25,000 employees) needing HIPAA/GDPR compliance.

Worst for

SMB on tight budget (Jotform + Tally fit better); modern conversational use cases (Typeform).

Strengths

  • Salesforce-native integration (deepest in category)
  • HIPAA and GDPR compliance native
  • Fortune-500 customer references
  • Enterprise scalability with workflow automation
  • Mature reporting and analytics
  • Strong Salesforce ecosystem partnership

Weaknesses

  • UX modernization less polished than Typeform + Tally
  • Pricing for SMB high relative to Jotform
  • Brand mindshare in modern-SaaS procurement defaults lower
  • Post-PE pricing pressure

Pricing tiers

partial
  • Essentials
    Basic forms + Salesforce integration
    $89 /mo
  • Team
    Multi-user + workflow
    $229 /mo
  • Premier
    Advanced features + HIPAA
    $359 /mo
  • Enterprise
    Custom + GDPR + multi-region
    Quote
Watch for
  • · Submission overages billed
  • · HIPAA add-on; implementation services $5K-$30K

Key features

  • +Salesforce-native integration (deepest)
  • +HIPAA + GDPR compliance
  • +Workflow automation
  • +Multi-user with role-based permissions
  • +Mature reporting and analytics
  • +Custom branding
  • +Payment integrations
  • +Multi-language support
60+ integrations
SalesforceHubSpotMicrosoft DynamicsMailchimpStripePayPalSlack
Geography
North America · Europe
#8

Gravity Forms

WordPress-native form leader with mature plugin ecosystem.

Founded 2008 · Marshalltown, IA · private · 1-1,000 employees
G2 4.6 (480)
Capterra 4.7
From $5 /mo
● Transparent pricing
Visit Gravity Forms

Gravity Forms launched 2008 by Rocketgenius and is the dominant WordPress-native form plugin. Wins on WordPress integration depth, mature plugin ecosystem, and one-time perpetual licensing alternative. Loses on standalone-cloud feature depth and modern UX.

Best for

WordPress-anchored sites needing native form integration.

Worst for

Non-WordPress (Typeform + Jotform + Tally fit better); enterprise compliance (FormAssembly).

Strengths

  • WordPress-native (deepest integration)
  • Mature plugin ecosystem with 1000+ add-ons
  • One-time license model option
  • Strong WordPress community
  • Founder-led with consistent strategy
  • Affordable pricing for WordPress sites

Weaknesses

  • Standalone-cloud feature depth less than Typeform + Jotform
  • WordPress dependency limits non-WordPress use
  • UX modernization slower than cloud-native peers
  • Plugin compatibility issues at WordPress upgrades

Pricing tiers

public
  • Basic
    1 site
    $5 /mo
  • Pro
    3 sites + add-ons
    $21 /mo
  • Elite
    Unlimited sites + all add-ons
    $32 /mo
Watch for
  • · Premium add-on licensing

Key features

  • +WordPress-native plugin
  • +Mature plugin ecosystem with 1000+ add-ons
  • +Conditional logic
  • +Payment integrations (Stripe, PayPal)
  • +Custom CSS and styling
  • +Multi-page forms
  • +Webhooks and Zapier
  • +GDPR compliance options
300+ integrations
StripePayPalMailchimpHubSpotSalesforceZapierSlackActive Campaign
Geography
Global
#6

Formstack

Cross-CRM enterprise forms with workflow automation and document generation.

Founded 2006 · Fishers, IN · pe backed · 500-25,000 employees
G2 4.4 (420)
Capterra 4.4
From $50 /mo
◐ Partial disclosure
Visit Formstack

Formstack launched 2006 and was recapitalized by Silversmith Capital Partners in 2020 (terms undisclosed). The platform serves enterprise customers with cross-CRM forms (Salesforce, HubSpot, Microsoft Dynamics), workflow automation, and document generation. Wins on cross-CRM coverage breadth and workflow features. Loses on UX modernization and post-PE pricing trajectory.

Best for

Cross-CRM enterprises (1000-25,000 employees) needing workflow and document generation.

Worst for

Modern conversational use cases (Typeform fit better); SMB on tight budget (Jotform).

Strengths

  • Cross-CRM coverage (Salesforce, HubSpot, Microsoft Dynamics, Marketo)
  • Workflow automation with approvals
  • Document generation
  • HIPAA + GDPR compliance
  • Mature enterprise customer base
  • Multi-user with role-based permissions

Weaknesses

  • UX modernization less polished than Typeform + Tally
  • Post-PE pricing pressure since 2020 recapitalization
  • Pricing tier escalators frustrate customers
  • Implementation complexity for advanced workflows

Pricing tiers

partial
  • Starter
    Basic forms
    $50 /mo
  • Teams
    Multi-user + workflow
    $99 /mo
  • Pro
    Advanced features + integrations
    $191 /mo
  • Enterprise
    HIPAA + GDPR + custom workflow
    Quote
Watch for
  • · Submission overages billed
  • · HIPAA add-on; implementation services

Key features

  • +Cross-CRM coverage (Salesforce, HubSpot, MS Dynamics, Marketo)
  • +Workflow automation with approvals
  • +Document generation (PDF, Word)
  • +HIPAA + GDPR compliance
  • +Multi-user with role-based permissions
  • +Mature reporting and analytics
  • +Payment integrations
  • +Form analytics and heatmaps
80+ integrations
SalesforceHubSpotMicrosoft DynamicsMarketoMailchimpSlackStripePayPal
Geography
North America · Europe
#7

Paperform

Designer-friendly creative forms with strong content layout features.

Founded 2016 · Sydney, Australia · private · 5-500 employees
G2 4.7 (280)
Capterra 4.7
From $24 /mo
● Transparent pricing
Visit Paperform

Paperform launched 2016 and serves SMB and design-conscious teams with strong layout features and creative form design. Wins on design-friendly UX and modern content authoring. Loses on enterprise feature depth and brand mindshare.

Best for

Design-conscious SMB and small teams wanting creative form design.

Worst for

Enterprise compliance (FormAssembly + Formstack fit better); WordPress (Gravity Forms).

Strengths

  • Designer-friendly creative form design
  • Strong content layout and theming
  • Modern UX
  • Founder-led with consistent strategy
  • Affordable pricing
  • Stripe payment integration

Weaknesses

  • Enterprise feature depth less than peers
  • Brand mindshare in legacy procurement defaults lower
  • Capital base smaller than peers
  • Smaller integration ecosystem

Pricing tiers

public
  • Essentials
    Basic forms
    $24 /mo
  • Pro
    Advanced features + payments
    $39 /mo
  • Business
    Multi-user + workflow
    $79 /mo
  • Agency
    Multi-client + white-label
    $159 /mo
Watch for
  • · Submission overages billed

Key features

  • +Designer-friendly form design
  • +Strong content layout and theming
  • +Conditional logic
  • +Stripe payment integration
  • +Custom branding
  • +Multi-language support
  • +Mobile-friendly
  • +Webhooks and Zapier
50+ integrations
StripeZapierMailchimpSlackGoogle SheetsNotion
Geography
Global
#9

Wufoo

SurveyMonkey-owned legacy form builder; product velocity slowed.

Founded 2006 · San Mateo, CA · private · 5-500 employees
G2 4.2 (360)
Capterra 4.4
From $14 /mo
● Transparent pricing
Visit Wufoo

Wufoo launched 2006 and was acquired by SurveyMonkey (now Momentive) for $35M in 2011. The platform remains operational within Momentive but product investment has visibly slowed: roadmap velocity dropped 50-70% per customer disclosures, UX has not modernized at peers pace, and Momentive customer-support quality post-Zendesk-cancelled-acquisition (2021) is uneven. Wins on legacy customer base and SurveyMonkey ecosystem integration. Loses on product velocity, UX modernization, and brand mindshare. Included for legacy/historical context.

Best for

Existing Wufoo legacy customers maintaining production deployments.

Worst for

New buyers (Typeform + Jotform + Tally fit better); modern conversational use cases.

Strengths

  • Legacy customer base since 2006
  • SurveyMonkey ecosystem integration
  • Mature feature set (when active)
  • Affordable pricing

Weaknesses

  • Product velocity visibly slowed
  • UX modernization stalled
  • Brand mindshare in modern procurement lower
  • Customer-support quality uneven post-Momentive Zendesk-acquisition-cancelled

Pricing tiers

public
  • Starter
    5 forms; 100 submissions/mo
    $14 /mo
  • Professional
    Unlimited forms; 1,000 submissions/mo
    $29 /mo
  • Advanced
    Unlimited forms; 17,500 submissions/mo
    $74 /mo
Watch for
  • · Submission overages billed

Key features

  • +Mature form builder
  • +Payment integrations (Stripe, PayPal)
  • +Conditional logic
  • +Custom branding
  • +Webhooks
  • +Reporting and analytics
  • +Mobile-friendly
80+ integrations
StripePayPalMailchimpZapierSlackSurveyMonkey
Geography
Global
#10

Cognito Forms

Mid-market forms with strong calculations and HIPAA compliance.

Founded 2013 · Columbia, SC · private · 5-1,000 employees
G2 4.7 (220)
Capterra 4.7
From $15 /mo
● Transparent pricing
Visit Cognito Forms

Cognito Forms launched 2013 and serves SMB and mid-market with strong calculation features and HIPAA compliance. Wins on calculations depth, HIPAA compliance, and affordable mid-market pricing. Loses on modern UX, brand mindshare, and capital base.

Best for

SMB and mid-market needing strong calculations + HIPAA compliance at affordable pricing.

Worst for

Enterprise (FormAssembly fit better); modern conversational UX (Typeform).

Strengths

  • Strong calculation and formula features
  • HIPAA compliance native
  • Affordable mid-market pricing
  • Founder-led with consistent strategy
  • Multi-language support
  • Mobile-friendly

Weaknesses

  • Modern UX less polished than Typeform + Tally
  • Brand mindshare in procurement defaults lower
  • Capital base smaller than peers
  • Smaller integration ecosystem

Pricing tiers

public
  • Individual
    500 entries/mo
    $15 /mo
  • Pro
    2,000 entries/mo
    $35 /mo
  • Team
    10,000 entries/mo + multi-user
    $99 /mo
  • Enterprise
    Custom + HIPAA + GDPR
    Quote
Watch for
  • · Entry overages billed

Key features

  • +Strong calculation and formula features
  • +HIPAA compliance native
  • +Conditional logic
  • +Payment integrations (Stripe, PayPal, Square)
  • +Multi-language support
  • +Custom branding
  • +Webhooks and Zapier
  • +Document generation
40+ integrations
StripePayPalSquareMailchimpSlackZapierMicrosoft Teams
Geography
North America · Europe

Frequently asked questions

The questions buyers actually ask before they sign.

Typeform vs Jotform for a Canadian B2B SaaS lead form?
Typeform if brand experience matters and conversational format fits your audience — common at Canadian SaaS like Wealthsimple and 1Password. Jotform if you need the widest template library, payment integrations, generous free tier, and SMB-friendly pricing — common at Canadian small businesses and nonprofits. Typeform converts better on B2B SaaS demo forms; Jotform wins on transactional and intake forms.
What does CASL compliance look like for our lead-capture form?
Specific express-consent language (e.g., "I agree to receive marketing emails from Acme Corp at this email address"), sender identification with a physical mailing address, an unsubscribe link in every follow-up email honoured within 10 business days, and consent records retained for at least three years. Pre-checked boxes are not valid. Double opt-in (confirmation email) is the recommended pattern after the Plenty of Fish, Compu-Finder, and Kellogg CRTC actions.
Do we need a French version of our Canadian lead-capture form?
If you are targeting Quebec residents, yes — Bill 96 strengthens the French-language requirement enforced by the Office québécois de la langue française. Typeform, Jotform, and FormAssembly all support multilingual forms; most Canadian SaaS serving Quebec maintain EN/FR pairs. Outside Quebec, English-only is generally acceptable.
Where do lead-capture data residency requirements bite for Canadian buyers?
For OSFI-regulated buyers and Quebec Law 25 scope, lead data should ideally live in Canadian regions or have contractually evidenced cross-border protections. FormAssembly, Formstack, and Salesforce-routed Typeform deployments can document Canadian residency; Jotform stores primarily in US regions. Document a Privacy Impact Assessment for Quebec-residents data routed cross-border, and confirm vendor SOC 2 Type 2 and ISO 27001 evidence.
Typeform vs Tally vs Fillout vs Jotform, which one wins?
For modern conversational UX with strong brand recognition: Typeform. For free-forever pricing with modern UX: Tally. For deep conditional logic + Airtable integration: Fillout. For mature feature breadth at competitive pricing: Jotform. For HIPAA compliance: Jotform or Cognito Forms or FormAssembly.
When does Typeform stop being enough?
You outgrow Typeform when one of these is true: (1) Salesforce-anchored compliance forms (FormAssembly), (2) cross-CRM workflow + document generation (Formstack), (3) high-volume submissions with tier-escalator concerns (Tally free-forever or Jotform), (4) deep Airtable integration (Fillout), (5) HIPAA compliance for healthcare (FormAssembly + Jotform + Cognito Forms).
How much should I budget for lead capture software?
SMB free tier (10-100 employees): $0 (Tally free, Typeform free, Jotform free). SMB paid (10-100 employees): $480-$600/year (Paperform, Fillout, Typeform Basic, Jotform Bronze). Mid-market (100-2000 employees): $1.8K-$4.8K/year (Typeform Plus/Business, Jotform Silver/Gold, Fillout Pro, FormAssembly Essentials). Enterprise (2000+ employees): $18K-$24K/year (FormAssembly Enterprise, Formstack Pro, Jotform Enterprise).
How does conversational form UX affect completion rate?
Modern conversational forms (Typeform, Tally, Fillout) typically deliver 15-40% higher completion rates than traditional multi-field forms (Wufoo, legacy Formstack) for short forms (under 10 questions). For long forms (20+ questions), conversational UX still wins but by a smaller margin (5-15%). For lead capture specifically, conversational UX is recommended for cold-traffic top-of-funnel capture; traditional forms are often acceptable for warm-traffic bottom-of-funnel.
WordPress-native vs cloud form builder?
WordPress-native (Gravity Forms): best fit if 90%+ of your traffic is WordPress-hosted. Cloud (Typeform, Jotform, Tally, Fillout): best fit if you have multi-channel traffic (WordPress, custom apps, mobile, social ads, landing pages). Some teams use both: Gravity Forms for WordPress + Typeform for landing pages.
HIPAA compliance for healthcare forms?
Healthcare lead capture and intake forms require HIPAA compliance. FormAssembly, Jotform (HIPAA tier), Formstack, and Cognito Forms ship HIPAA compliance with Business Associate Agreements (BAAs). Typeform and Tally do not offer HIPAA-compliant tiers. For healthcare, evaluate FormAssembly or Jotform HIPAA-compliant tier as the standard pattern.
How is AI changing form building?
AI is reshaping form building at three layers: (1) Form authoring: AI generates form structure and field types from natural-language descriptions (Typeform AI, Jotform AI Agent, Tally AI, Fillout AI). (2) Response analysis: AI summarizes submission patterns and surfaces insights (most major platforms). (3) Personalization: AI adapts question flow based on respondent profile (early stage). The role is shifting from manual form authoring toward judgment-driven funnel optimization.
What about no-code platforms (Bubble, Webflow) for forms?
No-code platforms (Bubble, Webflow, Framer) ship basic form features sufficient for simple landing-page lead capture. For more sophisticated lead capture (conditional logic, integrations, conversion optimization, compliance), dedicated form platforms (Typeform, Jotform, Tally, Fillout, FormAssembly) deliver materially more depth. Many teams use both: no-code platform for landing pages + dedicated form for complex captures.
Cross-CRM strategy vs single-CRM-native?
For Salesforce-anchored enterprises wanting deepest integration: FormAssembly is the standard pattern. For cross-CRM (Salesforce + HubSpot + MS Dynamics) enterprises: Formstack is the standard pattern. For modern stacks using HubSpot or Pipedrive: Typeform, Jotform, Fillout all integrate well; Salesforce integration depth varies.
What about Wufoo and its post-SurveyMonkey trajectory?
Wufoo was acquired by SurveyMonkey for $35M in 2011 and remains operational within Momentive (SurveyMonkey rebrand). However, product investment has visibly slowed: roadmap velocity dropped 50-70% per customer disclosures, UX has not modernized at peers pace, and post-Momentive-Zendesk-acquisition-cancelled (2021) customer-support quality is uneven. We include Wufoo for legacy/historical context; for new deployments, Typeform + Jotform + Tally + Fillout are better choices.

Final word

Looking at a different market? See the global Lead Capture and Forms Software ranking, or pick another country at the top of this page.

Last updated 2026-05-27. Local pricing reverified quarterly. Found something inaccurate? Tell us.