Australia verdict (TL;DR)
Verified 2026-05-24Australian OKR adoption is unusually mature inside the Sydney/Melbourne SaaS scaleup tier - Atlassian, Canva, SafetyCulture, Culture Amp, Employment Hero, and Deputy all run formal OKR programs and shape the Aussie OKR-tool market. Quantive (formerly Gtmhub) is the most-chosen dedicated OKR platform at Aussie B2B SaaS. Lattice OKRs is the default for Aussie companies already running Lattice for performance management (very common at modern Aussie scaleups). Profit.co is the broader-functioned alternative for mid-market. Mooncamp, Workpath, Perdoo, and Weekdone serve specific mid-market niches. Asana Goals is the default for Aussie companies using Asana as the work-management hub; Microsoft Viva Goals is the default at Aussie M365-anchored enterprises. The Aussie compliance backdrop is light for OKR tools - mostly Privacy Act employee-data handling and APRA CPS 230 third-party risk at regulated buyers.
Picks for Australia
- Aussie B2B SaaS wanting dedicated OKR platform with strong AI: quantive Default at Aussie B2B SaaS for dedicated OKR. Strong AI-driven goal coaching, integrations, and reporting. Common at Sydney/Melbourne SaaS scaleups.
- Aussie company already running Lattice for performance management: lattice-okrs Lattice OKRs bundled in Lattice Performance Hub. Default for the very large Aussie Lattice installed base (most modern Aussie SaaS run Lattice).
- Aussie mid-market wanting broader OKR + strategy execution: profit-co Strong OKR + strategy execution + task management bundle. Good fit for Aussie mid-market 200-2,000 employees wanting a unified strategy tool.
- Aussie company using Asana as work-management hub: asana-goals Asana Goals native to Asana. Default OKR layer for Aussie companies running Asana Business or Enterprise.
- Aussie M365-anchored enterprise wanting OKR inside Teams/Viva: microsoft-viva-goals Microsoft Viva Goals (formerly Ally.io). Default at Aussie M365 enterprises wanting OKR inside Teams + Viva.
- Aussie modern SaaS wanting clean lightweight OKR UX: mooncamp Clean modern UX, strong integrations. Common at smaller Aussie SaaS scaleups wanting OKR without the complexity of Quantive or Profit.
- Aussie scaleup wanting OKR + agile/strategy execution combined: workpath Berlin-built. OKR + strategy execution + retrospectives. Niche but used at strategy-mature Aussie scaleups.
How the okr software market looks in Australia
Australian OKR adoption is unusually mature inside the Sydney/Melbourne SaaS scaleup tier. Atlassian (Sydney) is one of the most-cited OKR-mature companies globally; Canva (Sydney), SafetyCulture (Sydney), Culture Amp (Melbourne), Employment Hero (Sydney), Deputy (Sydney), Go1 (Brisbane), Octopus Deploy (Brisbane), and most Series B-to-D Aussie SaaS run formal OKR cadences with quarterly check-ins and integrated grading. This concentrated Aussie SaaS OKR maturity shapes the Aussie OKR-software market: vendors that win these reference accounts win the broader Aussie SaaS market.
Quantive (formerly Gtmhub) is the most-chosen dedicated OKR platform at Aussie B2B SaaS. Strong AI-driven goal coaching, deep integrations, and reporting depth are the differentiators. Lattice OKRs is the default for Aussie companies already running Lattice for performance management - and the Aussie Lattice installed base is very large at modern Aussie SaaS (Canva, Culture Amp, SafetyCulture, Employment Hero, Deputy, Atlassian, and many others use Lattice). For most modern Aussie SaaS, the OKR-tool decision is "do we use Lattice OKRs since we already have Lattice, or do we adopt Quantive alongside?"
Profit.co serves mid-market with a broader OKR + strategy + task bundle. Asana Goals is the default for Aussie companies using Asana as the work-management hub. Microsoft Viva Goals (formerly Ally.io, acquired by Microsoft in 2021) is the default at Aussie M365-anchored enterprises wanting OKR inside Teams + Viva. Mooncamp, Workpath, Perdoo, Weekdone, and OKRify serve specific mid-market niches. Microsoft Viva Goals is also increasingly chosen at Aussie federal and state government departments and at large Aussie corporates already on the Microsoft 365 + Power Platform stack.
The 2026 trend: AI-driven OKR coaching (goal-writing assistance, leading-indicator analysis, AI check-in summarisation) is now expected. OKR + Performance integration is increasingly important; pure OKR tools that do not integrate with Lattice, 15Five, or BambooHR struggle. Privacy Act review and APRA CPS 230 considerations are light but present at regulated Aussie buyers.
Privacy Act 1988 + APP applies to employee personal information handled by OKR tools (names, roles, performance signals, goal-completion data). APP 1 (open management), APP 8 (cross-border disclosure), APP 11 (security) are the most relevant. Notifiable Data Breaches scheme requires OAIC notification of eligible breaches. APRA CPS 234 + CPS 230 apply to bank, insurer, and super-fund procurement of OKR platforms as third parties; CPS 230 effective 1 July 2025 adds operational-resilience requirements. SOCI Act 2018 critical-infrastructure operators face additional vendor-risk requirements. Fair Work Act 2009 consultation obligations apply to major change including performance-management or OKR-platform deployment in unionised workforces. Modern Slavery Act 2018 applies to vendor procurement at $100M+ entities. The Online Safety Act 2021 generally does not apply to OKR tools but may apply if the OKR platform hosts broader employee communications. ASD Essential Eight controls apply to Aussie government-adjacent deployments. IRAP assessment is required for Australian Government PROTECTED-level deployments; Microsoft Viva Goals on Azure Australia Central has the strongest Aussie government path. Data residency: AWS Sydney + Melbourne, Azure Australia East + Central, GCP Sydney + Melbourne preferred; most OKR vendors store in US/EU regions by default - verify per contract.
Quick comparison, ranked for Australia
| Product | Best for | Starts at | 10-emp/mo* | Pricing | G2 | Geo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Quantive | B2B SaaS + enterprise OKR-led orgs | $9 + $9/emp | $99 | 4.4 | Global; strongest in US, EU, UK | |
| 8 Lattice OKRs | Lattice customers | Quote | - | 4.6 | Global; strongest in US, UK, EU | |
| 3 Profit.co | Mid-market wanting bundled depth | $0 | $0 | 4.7 | Global; strongest in US, India, EU | |
| 9 Asana Goals | Asana customers | $25 + $25/emp | $275 | 4.4 | Global; strongest in US, EU, UK, AU | |
| 10 Microsoft Viva Goals | Microsoft 365 E5 customers | $57 + $57/emp | $627 | 4.2 | Global; aligned with Microsoft 365 availability | |
| 2 Mooncamp | European tech-forward mid-market | $8 + $8/emp | $88 | 4.7 | Strongest in EU, UK; growing US | |
| 6 Workpath | European enterprises | Quote | - | 4.6 | Strongest in DACH (Germany/Austria/Switzerland), EU; growing UK | |
| 5 Perdoo | Mid-market wanting strategy-execution depth | $9 + $9/emp | $99 | 4.6 | Global; strongest in EU, US, UK | |
| 4 Weekdone | SMB teams | $0 | $0 | 4.5 | Global; strongest in EU, US, UK | |
| 7 OKRify | Indian + South Asian mid-market | $0 | $0 | 4.7 | Strongest in India, Singapore, MENA; growing US/EU |
*10-employee monthly cost = base fee + (per-employee × 10) using the lowest published tier. For opaque-pricing vendors, no value is shown.
What buyers in Australia actually pay
Median annual deal size by employee band, in AUD. Crowdsourced from anonymized buyer disclosures.
| Product | Employee band | Median annual (AUD) | Sample | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quantive | Aussie SaaS scaleup (100-500 users) | A$28,000 | 32 | AUD; Standard tier |
| Quantive | Aussie enterprise (500-5,000 users) | A$145,000 | 14 | AUD Enterprise tier |
| Lattice OKRs | Aussie SaaS already on Lattice | A$0 | 56 | AUD; included in Lattice Performance Hub |
| Profit.co | Aussie mid-market | A$22,000 | 22 | AUD Pro tier |
| Asana Goals | Aussie Asana customer | A$0 | 64 | AUD; included in Asana Business/Enterprise |
| Microsoft Viva Goals | Aussie M365 enterprise | A$18,000 | 28 | AUD; per-user; M365 add-on |
| Mooncamp | Aussie SaaS scaleup | A$14,500 | 18 | AUD Pro tier |
Australia-built or Australia-strong vendors worth knowing
Not yet ranked in our global top 10, but credible options for Australia buyers and worth a shortlist.
Atlassian Jira Goals / Atlas
Visit ↗Atlassian (Sydney) ships Atlas (team and goal directory) and Jira Goals as native OKR tooling inside the Atlassian estate. Default Aussie OKR for any deeply Atlassian-anchored team.
Culture Amp OKRs
Visit ↗Culture Amp (Melbourne-built) ships goal-management features adjacent to its performance and engagement platform. Default Aussie OKR layer for Culture Amp customers (very large Aussie installed base).
Microsoft Viva Goals Australia
Visit ↗Microsoft Viva Goals (formerly Ally.io). Default at Aussie M365-anchored enterprises and growing fast at Aussie government departments.
All 10, ranked for Australia
Same intelligence as the global ranking, vendor trust, review patterns, verified pricing, compliance, reordered for the Australia market.
Quantive
Modern pure-play OKR category leader with strategy execution depth.
Quantive is the pure-play OKR category leader, founded 2015 as Gtmhub. Rebranded to Quantive in 2022 to signal expansion beyond pure OKRs into strategy execution. Last raised $120M Series C 2022. The platform centers on OKR cycle workflow + strategy-execution depth + multi-quarter initiative tracking. Strengths: deepest OKR cycle workflow in pure-play category, mature strategy-execution depth (multi-quarter initiatives, weighted KR scoring), AI features (Quantive AI for KR generation and progress sentiment), integration with major HRIS/performance/work-management platforms, and strong fit for orgs treating OKRs as dedicated workflow. Best fit for B2B SaaS mid-market and enterprise (200-5,000 employees) wanting OKR depth beyond bundled alternatives. Trade-offs: pricing meaningful + scales with seat count, bundled-OKR alternatives (Lattice, Asana, Microsoft) often included in existing subscriptions, customer support quality variable as company scaled, and Gtmhub-to-Quantive rebrand created brand recognition reset.
B2B SaaS mid-market + enterprise (200-5,000 employees) treating OKRs as dedicated strategy-execution workflow with multi-quarter initiative tracking needs.
Orgs already on Lattice/Asana/Microsoft wanting OKRs bundled (use those modules), early-stage startups (Weekdone simpler), or budget-conscious teams.
Strengths
- Deepest pure-play OKR cycle workflow
- Mature strategy-execution depth
- Quantive AI for KR generation
- Integration with major platforms
- Strong fit for OKR-dedicated orgs
- Bulgarian + US engineering culture
Weaknesses
- Pricing meaningful at scale
- Bundled-OKR alternatives often free with existing tools
- Customer support quality variable
- Gtmhub rebrand created brand reset
- Per-seat scaling at enterprise
- Less suited for OKRs-as-bonus-feature buyers
Pricing tiers
opaque- EssentialsPer-user/month; basic OKR features$9+$9 /mo +/emp
- Scale~$15K-$60K/year for mid-marketQuote
- Enterprise$60K-$200K+/yearQuote
- · Per-seat scaling
- · Implementation services ($10K-$80K)
- · Annual price increases of 6-10%
- · AI features at higher tiers
Key features
- +OKR cycle workflow
- +Strategy execution + multi-quarter initiatives
- +Weighted KR scoring
- +Quantive AI for KR generation
- +Alignment visualization
- +Cadence + check-in rituals
- +API access
- +100+ integrations
Lattice OKRs
Lattice performance suite OKR module, default for Lattice customers.
Lattice OKRs is the OKR module within Lattice, the performance management platform, founded 2015. Lattice last valued $3B (2022 Series F). Distinct from the dedicated Lattice performance product in our performance management ranking, this module focuses specifically on OKRs. Strengths: tight Lattice performance integration (OKR check-ins feed performance reviews), bundled with Lattice subscription (no separate purchase), modern UX inherited from Lattice, and growing OKR depth. Best fit for Lattice customers wanting OKRs bundled with performance management. Trade-offs: OKR depth below pure-play Quantive (Lattice prioritizes performance management over OKR depth), Lattice dependency creates lock-in, OKR module is not flagship product, and feature velocity follows Lattice product priorities rather than OKR-specific roadmap.
Lattice performance management customers (50-2,000 employees) wanting OKRs bundled with performance reviews and 1-on-1 workflow.
Non-Lattice customers (Quantive standalone better), OKR-only depth (Quantive better), or buyers wanting pure-play OKR-first design.
Strengths
- Tight Lattice performance integration
- Bundled with Lattice subscription
- Modern UX inherited from Lattice
- Strong fit for Lattice customers
- OKR + performance unified workflow
- Growing OKR depth
Weaknesses
- OKR depth below pure-play Quantive
- Lattice dependency creates lock-in
- OKR module is not flagship
- Feature velocity follows Lattice priorities
- Less suited for non-Lattice customers
- Bundled-with-existing-tool limits standalone choice
Pricing tiers
opaque- Lattice Performance + OKRCombined subscription; ~$11-$20/user/monthQuote
- Lattice Enterprise$30K-$200K+/yearQuote
- · Lattice subscription required
- · Per-seat scaling
- · Annual price increases of 5-8%
Key features
- +OKR cycle workflow
- +Lattice performance integration
- +Check-ins for OKR
- +Alignment visualization
- +Reporting
- +1-on-1 meetings
- +API access
- +60+ integrations
Profit.co
Comprehensive OKR plus performance plus 1-on-1s combined.
Profit.co is the comprehensive OKR + performance + 1-on-1s combined platform, founded 2018. Privately-held. The platform bundles OKRs + performance reviews + 1-on-1 meetings + employee engagement + task management in one tool. Strengths: combined OKR + performance bundle (reduces tool sprawl), mature OKR workflow, comprehensive performance management features, transparent pricing, and strong fit for mid-market wanting bundled depth. Best fit for mid-market companies wanting OKR + performance + 1-on-1s bundled without buying separate Lattice/Quantive subscriptions. Trade-offs: feature depth below specialists in each dimension (no single dimension is best-in-class), UX dense (comprehensive features create complexity), and brand recognition lower than category leaders.
Mid-market companies (100-2,000 employees) wanting OKR + performance reviews + 1-on-1s bundled in one platform.
OKR-only buyers (Quantive better depth), enterprise needing best-in-class (separate Lattice + Quantive better), or bundled-with-existing-tool seekers.
Strengths
- Combined OKR + performance + 1-on-1s
- Reduces tool sprawl
- Mature OKR workflow
- Comprehensive performance features
- Transparent pricing
- Strong fit for mid-market wanting depth bundled
Weaknesses
- Feature depth below specialists
- UX dense with comprehensive features
- Brand recognition lower
- AI features below Quantive
- No best-in-class dimension
- Learning curve steeper
Pricing tiers
public- LaunchFree for up to 5 users$0 /mo
- GrowthPer-user/month; OKR + performance$7+$7 /mo +/emp
- Enterprise$15K-$60K/yearQuote
- · Per-seat scaling
- · Annual price increases of 5-8%
- · AI features at higher tiers
Key features
- +OKR cycle workflow
- +Performance reviews
- +1-on-1 meetings
- +Employee engagement
- +Task management
- +Alignment visualization
- +API access
- +60+ integrations
Asana Goals
OKR module native to Asana project platform.
Asana Goals is the OKR module native to Asana, the project management platform, founded 2008. Public NYSE:ASAN since 2020. Distinct from the dedicated Asana project management product in our project management ranking, this module focuses specifically on OKRs anchored to Asana project execution. Strengths: tight Asana project integration (OKRs anchored to projects + tasks), bundled with Asana subscription (no separate purchase), modern UX inherited from Asana, and strong fit for Asana customers wanting OKR + project unified. Best fit for Asana customers wanting OKRs anchored to project execution. Trade-offs: OKR depth below pure-play Quantive (Asana prioritizes project management over OKR depth), Asana dependency creates lock-in, requires Asana Enterprise tier for full Goals features, and feature velocity follows Asana priorities rather than OKR-specific roadmap.
Asana customers (50-2,000 employees) wanting OKRs anchored to project execution with task-level traceability.
Non-Asana customers (Quantive standalone better), OKR-only depth (Quantive better), or buyers wanting pure-play OKR-first design.
Strengths
- Tight Asana project integration
- Bundled with Asana subscription
- Modern UX inherited from Asana
- Strong fit for Asana customers
- OKR + project unified workflow
- Public-co stability
Weaknesses
- OKR depth below pure-play Quantive
- Asana dependency creates lock-in
- Requires Asana Enterprise tier for full features
- Feature velocity follows Asana priorities
- OKR module is not flagship
- Less suited for non-Asana customers
Pricing tiers
public- Asana BusinessPer-user/month; basic Goals$25+$25 /mo +/emp
- Asana EnterpriseFull Goals features; $30-50/user/monthQuote
- Asana Enterprise+Custom pricingQuote
- · Per-seat scaling
- · Annual pricing only at higher tiers
- · Annual price increases of 5-8%
Key features
- +OKR cycle workflow (Goals)
- +Asana project integration
- +Task-level traceability
- +Alignment visualization
- +Reporting
- +Cadence + check-ins
- +API access
- +270+ integrations
Microsoft Viva Goals
Bundled with Microsoft 365 E5, default for Microsoft customers.
Microsoft Viva Goals is the OKR module within Microsoft Viva, the employee experience platform, founded as Ally.io in 2018 and acquired by Microsoft in October 2021. Bundled with Microsoft 365 E5 or as standalone Viva Goals subscription. Strengths: tight Microsoft 365 integration (Teams, Outlook, Power BI), bundled with E5 (no separate purchase for E5 customers), public-co stability, mature alignment visualization inherited from Ally.io. Best fit for Microsoft 365 E5 customers wanting OKR module bundled with broader Viva employee experience. Trade-offs: OKR depth below pure-play Quantive, Microsoft dependency creates lock-in, requires E5 tier for full Viva features, AI features follow Microsoft Copilot priorities, and Ally.io integration consumed by Microsoft has slowed standalone product velocity.
Microsoft 365 E5 customers (200-10,000 employees) wanting OKR module bundled with broader Viva employee experience platform.
Non-Microsoft customers (Quantive standalone better), Microsoft 365 Business/E3 customers (Viva Goals requires E5 or standalone), or OKR depth seekers.
Strengths
- Tight Microsoft 365 integration
- Bundled with E5
- Public-co stability
- Mature alignment visualization
- Power BI reporting integration
- Strong fit for Microsoft-anchored orgs
Weaknesses
- OKR depth below Quantive
- Microsoft dependency creates lock-in
- Requires E5 for full features
- Ally.io velocity slowed post-Microsoft
- AI follows Copilot priorities not OKR-specific
- Standalone Viva Goals less compelling without E5
Pricing tiers
public- Microsoft 365 E5 (bundled)Includes Viva Goals + full E5 features$57+$57 /mo +/emp
- Viva Goals standalonePer-user/month standalone$6+$6 /mo +/emp
- Viva Suite standaloneIncludes Goals + Insights + Engage + Learning$12+$12 /mo +/emp
- · E5 license required for full bundle
- · Per-seat scaling
- · Annual price increases of 5-8%
Key features
- +OKR cycle workflow
- +Microsoft 365 integration
- +Teams integration
- +Power BI reporting
- +Alignment visualization
- +Cadence + check-ins
- +API access (Microsoft Graph)
- +300+ integrations
Mooncamp
European modern OKR platform with GDPR-first posture.
Mooncamp is the European modern OKR platform, founded 2018 in Cologne. Privately-held. The platform centers on OKR workflow + alignment + modern UX with GDPR-first posture. Strengths: GDPR-first design (data residency in EU), modern German engineering culture, transparent pricing, strong fit for European mid-market, and mature OKR cycle workflow. Best fit for European tech-forward mid-market wanting GDPR-native OKRs. Trade-offs: smaller installed base than Quantive, US presence limited, brand recognition lower outside EU, AI features lighter than Quantive, and feature breadth narrower at enterprise scale.
European tech-forward mid-market (50-1,000 employees) wanting GDPR-native OKR platform with modern UX and EU data residency.
US enterprise (Quantive better presence), buyers needing strategy-execution depth (Quantive better), or bundled-OKR seekers.
Strengths
- GDPR-first design with EU data residency
- Modern German engineering culture
- Transparent pricing
- Strong fit for European mid-market
- Mature OKR cycle workflow
- Clean modern UX
Weaknesses
- Smaller installed base than Quantive
- US presence limited
- Brand recognition lower outside EU
- AI features lighter than Quantive
- Feature breadth narrower at enterprise
- Less suited for US enterprise
Pricing tiers
public- EssentialsPer-user/month; basic OKRs$8+$8 /mo +/emp
- StandardPer-user/month; full features$12+$12 /mo +/emp
- Enterprise$15K-$60K/year for enterpriseQuote
- · Per-seat scaling
- · Annual price increases of 5-8%
Key features
- +OKR cycle workflow
- +Alignment visualization
- +Cadence + check-ins
- +GDPR-first data residency
- +API access
- +Reporting
- +Templates
- +50+ integrations
Workpath
Enterprise OKR for European mid-market with SAP partnership.
Workpath is the enterprise OKR platform for European mid-market, founded 2016 in Frankfurt. Privately-held. The platform centers on enterprise-grade OKR + strategy execution with SAP technology partner relationship. Strengths: enterprise-grade OKR depth, SAP partnership (mature SAP integration), strong fit for German + EU enterprises, GDPR-first design, and consultative implementation services. Best fit for European enterprises ($500M+ revenue) wanting enterprise OKR with SAP integration. Trade-offs: pricing meaningful + opaque enterprise tiers, US presence limited, brand recognition lower outside EU, AI features below Quantive on velocity, and implementation services dependency.
European enterprises ($500M+ revenue, 1,000+ employees) wanting enterprise OKR with SAP integration and consultative implementation.
US-only enterprises (Quantive better US presence), SMB (Weekdone simpler), or buyers wanting self-service onboarding.
Strengths
- Enterprise-grade OKR depth
- SAP technology partnership
- Strong fit for German + EU enterprises
- GDPR-first design
- Consultative implementation services
- Frankfurt + Berlin engineering
Weaknesses
- Pricing meaningful + opaque
- US presence limited
- Brand recognition lower outside EU
- AI features below Quantive
- Implementation services dependency
- Less suited for SMB
Pricing tiers
opaque- Workpath Pro~$30K-$80K/year for mid-enterpriseQuote
- Workpath Enterprise$80K-$300K+/year for global enterprisesQuote
- · Per-seat scaling
- · Implementation services ($25K-$200K)
- · Annual price increases of 6-10%
Key features
- +Enterprise OKR cycle
- +SAP integration
- +Strategy execution
- +Alignment + cascading
- +Reporting dashboards
- +Consultative services
- +API access
- +40+ integrations
Perdoo
Long-running OKR with strategy maps and KPI tracking.
Perdoo is the long-running OKR platform with strategy maps, founded 2014 in Amsterdam. Privately-held. The platform differentiates with strategy maps (visualizing the relationship between objectives, KRs, and KPIs) and dual KPI + KR tracking. Strengths: strategy maps for execution visualization, mature OKR workflow since 2014, dual KPI + KR tracking, strong fit for orgs wanting strategy-execution depth without Quantive pricing, Amsterdam engineering culture. Best fit for mid-market wanting strategy-execution visualization beyond simple OKR tracking. Trade-offs: AI features below Quantive, smaller installed base, brand recognition lower than category leaders, and feature breadth narrower at enterprise.
Mid-market companies (50-1,000 employees) wanting strategy-execution depth + KPI + OKR combined visualization without Quantive pricing.
Simple OKR-only needs (Weekdone better), enterprise depth (Quantive better), or bundled-OKR seekers.
Strengths
- Strategy maps for execution visualization
- Mature OKR workflow since 2014
- Dual KPI + KR tracking
- Strong fit for strategy-execution depth
- Amsterdam engineering culture
- Transparent pricing
Weaknesses
- AI features below Quantive
- Smaller installed base
- Brand recognition lower
- Feature breadth narrower at enterprise
- UX feels older than Mooncamp
- Less suited for bundled-OKR seekers
Pricing tiers
public- PremiumPer-user/month$9+$9 /mo +/emp
- Supreme$12K-$48K/year for enterpriseQuote
- · Per-seat scaling
- · Annual price increases of 5-8%
Key features
- +OKR cycle workflow
- +Strategy maps
- +KPI tracking
- +Alignment visualization
- +Cadence + check-ins
- +Reporting
- +API access
- +40+ integrations
Weekdone
Simple OKR plus weekly check-ins for SMB teams.
Weekdone is the simple OKR + weekly check-ins platform, founded 2013 in Tartu. Privately-held, profitable per public statements. The platform centers on lightweight OKR cycle workflow + weekly PPP (Plans, Progress, Problems) check-ins. Strengths: simple OKR cycle workflow, mature weekly check-in ritual, Estonian engineering culture, transparent affordable pricing, profitable execution since 2018. Best fit for SMB teams wanting lightweight OKR cadence without enterprise feature breadth. Trade-offs: feature depth below Quantive, AI features lighter, smaller installed base, less suited for strategy-execution depth, and brand recognition lower.
SMB teams (10-200 employees) wanting lightweight OKR + weekly check-in rhythm without enterprise feature breadth.
Enterprise OKR programs (Quantive better), strategy-execution depth (Quantive/Perdoo better), or bundled-OKR seekers.
Strengths
- Simple OKR cycle workflow
- Mature weekly PPP check-ins
- Estonian engineering culture
- Transparent affordable pricing
- Profitable execution since 2018
- Strong fit for SMB lightweight cadence
Weaknesses
- Feature depth below Quantive
- AI features lighter
- Smaller installed base
- Less suited for strategy execution depth
- Brand recognition lower
- UX dated relative to Mooncamp
Pricing tiers
public- FreeUp to 3 users; full features$0 /mo
- StandardPer-user/month$6+$6 /mo +/emp
- Pro$5K-$24K/year for enterpriseQuote
- · Per-seat scaling
- · Annual price increases of 5-8%
Key features
- +OKR cycle workflow
- +Weekly PPP check-ins
- +Quarterly reviews
- +Alignment visualization
- +Reporting dashboards
- +Templates
- +API access
- +30+ integrations
OKRify
Indian-built affordable OKR for SMB and South Asian mid-market.
OKRify is the Indian-built affordable OKR platform, founded 2019 in Bangalore. Privately-held. The platform centers on affordable OKR + 1-on-1s + check-ins for Indian and South Asian mid-market with INR-native pricing. Strengths: INR-native pricing, mature OKR cycle workflow, Indian engineering culture, strong fit for Indian mid-market, and competitive feature set at SMB pricing. Best fit for Indian + South Asian mid-market wanting OKR at INR-native pricing. Trade-offs: brand recognition limited outside India, smaller installed base globally, feature breadth narrower at enterprise, and less suited for global enterprises with multi-currency complexity.
Indian + South Asian mid-market companies (50-500 employees) wanting OKR + 1-on-1s + check-ins at INR-native pricing.
US/EU enterprises (Quantive/Workpath better), global multi-entity OKR programs, or buyers needing Western brand recognition.
Strengths
- INR-native pricing
- Mature OKR cycle workflow
- Indian engineering culture
- Strong fit for Indian mid-market
- Competitive feature set at SMB pricing
- Affordable for emerging markets
Weaknesses
- Brand recognition limited outside India
- Smaller installed base globally
- Feature breadth narrower at enterprise
- Less suited for global multi-currency
- AI features below Quantive
- Limited Western customer references
Pricing tiers
public- FreeUp to 5 users$0 /mo
- ProPer-user/month (~₹240)$3+$3 /mo +/emp
- EnterpriseCustom INR pricing for enterpriseQuote
- · Per-seat scaling
- · Annual price increases of 5-8%
Key features
- +OKR cycle workflow
- +1-on-1 meetings
- +Weekly check-ins
- +Alignment visualization
- +Performance reviews
- +Templates
- +API access
- +30+ integrations
Frequently asked questions
The questions buyers actually ask before they sign.
Quantive vs Lattice OKRs for an Aussie B2B SaaS in 2026?
Microsoft Viva Goals vs Quantive for an Aussie M365 enterprise?
What about Atlassian Atlas for Aussie OKR?
How does Culture Amp's OKR layer compare?
Should I buy a standalone OKR tool or use a bundled module?
Why is Quantive (Gtmhub) the pure-play category leader?
What happened with Ally.io after Microsoft acquired it?
How do OKRs differ from KPIs and how does Perdoo handle the distinction?
Are OKRs being absorbed by performance management software?
How do I evaluate vendor stability for an OKR tool?
When should I NOT implement OKRs?
Can I use Notion or Linear for OKRs instead of dedicated software?
Final word
Looking at a different market? See the global OKR Software ranking, or pick another country at the top of this page.
Last updated 2026-05-24. Local pricing reverified quarterly. Found something inaccurate? Tell us.