OKR Software

Modern pure-play OKR category leader with strategy execution depth.

Quantive is the pure-play OKR category leader, founded 2015 as Gtmhub. Rebranded to Quantive in 2022 to signal expansion beyond pure OKRs into strategy execution. Last raised $120M Series C 2022. The platform centers on OKR cycle workflow + strategy-execution depth + multi-quarter initiative tracking. Strengths: deepest OKR cycle workflow in pure-play category, mature strategy-execution depth (multi-quarter initiatives, weighted KR scoring), AI features (Quantive AI for KR generation and progress sentiment), integration with major HRIS/performance/work-management platforms, and strong fit for orgs treating OKRs as dedicated workflow. Best fit for B2B SaaS mid-market and enterprise (200-5,000 employees) wanting OKR depth beyond bundled alternatives. Trade-offs: pricing meaningful + scales with seat count, bundled-OKR alternatives (Lattice, Asana, Microsoft) often included in existing subscriptions, customer support quality variable as company scaled, and Gtmhub-to-Quantive rebrand created brand recognition reset.

European modern OKR platform with GDPR-first posture.

Mooncamp is the European modern OKR platform, founded 2018 in Cologne. Privately-held. The platform centers on OKR workflow + alignment + modern UX with GDPR-first posture. Strengths: GDPR-first design (data residency in EU), modern German engineering culture, transparent pricing, strong fit for European mid-market, and mature OKR cycle workflow. Best fit for European tech-forward mid-market wanting GDPR-native OKRs. Trade-offs: smaller installed base than Quantive, US presence limited, brand recognition lower outside EU, AI features lighter than Quantive, and feature breadth narrower at enterprise scale.

Comprehensive OKR plus performance plus 1-on-1s combined.

Profit.co is the comprehensive OKR + performance + 1-on-1s combined platform, founded 2018. Privately-held. The platform bundles OKRs + performance reviews + 1-on-1 meetings + employee engagement + task management in one tool. Strengths: combined OKR + performance bundle (reduces tool sprawl), mature OKR workflow, comprehensive performance management features, transparent pricing, and strong fit for mid-market wanting bundled depth. Best fit for mid-market companies wanting OKR + performance + 1-on-1s bundled without buying separate Lattice/Quantive subscriptions. Trade-offs: feature depth below specialists in each dimension (no single dimension is best-in-class), UX dense (comprehensive features create complexity), and brand recognition lower than category leaders.

Simple OKR plus weekly check-ins for SMB teams.

Weekdone is the simple OKR + weekly check-ins platform, founded 2013 in Tartu. Privately-held, profitable per public statements. The platform centers on lightweight OKR cycle workflow + weekly PPP (Plans, Progress, Problems) check-ins. Strengths: simple OKR cycle workflow, mature weekly check-in ritual, Estonian engineering culture, transparent affordable pricing, profitable execution since 2018. Best fit for SMB teams wanting lightweight OKR cadence without enterprise feature breadth. Trade-offs: feature depth below Quantive, AI features lighter, smaller installed base, less suited for strategy-execution depth, and brand recognition lower.

Long-running OKR with strategy maps and KPI tracking.

Perdoo is the long-running OKR platform with strategy maps, founded 2014 in Amsterdam. Privately-held. The platform differentiates with strategy maps (visualizing the relationship between objectives, KRs, and KPIs) and dual KPI + KR tracking. Strengths: strategy maps for execution visualization, mature OKR workflow since 2014, dual KPI + KR tracking, strong fit for orgs wanting strategy-execution depth without Quantive pricing, Amsterdam engineering culture. Best fit for mid-market wanting strategy-execution visualization beyond simple OKR tracking. Trade-offs: AI features below Quantive, smaller installed base, brand recognition lower than category leaders, and feature breadth narrower at enterprise.

Enterprise OKR for European mid-market with SAP partnership.

Workpath is the enterprise OKR platform for European mid-market, founded 2016 in Frankfurt. Privately-held. The platform centers on enterprise-grade OKR + strategy execution with SAP technology partner relationship. Strengths: enterprise-grade OKR depth, SAP partnership (mature SAP integration), strong fit for German + EU enterprises, GDPR-first design, and consultative implementation services. Best fit for European enterprises ($500M+ revenue) wanting enterprise OKR with SAP integration. Trade-offs: pricing meaningful + opaque enterprise tiers, US presence limited, brand recognition lower outside EU, AI features below Quantive on velocity, and implementation services dependency.

Indian-built affordable OKR for SMB and South Asian mid-market.

OKRify is the Indian-built affordable OKR platform, founded 2019 in Bangalore. Privately-held. The platform centers on affordable OKR + 1-on-1s + check-ins for Indian and South Asian mid-market with INR-native pricing. Strengths: INR-native pricing, mature OKR cycle workflow, Indian engineering culture, strong fit for Indian mid-market, and competitive feature set at SMB pricing. Best fit for Indian + South Asian mid-market wanting OKR at INR-native pricing. Trade-offs: brand recognition limited outside India, smaller installed base globally, feature breadth narrower at enterprise, and less suited for global enterprises with multi-currency complexity.

Lattice performance suite OKR module, default for Lattice customers.

Lattice OKRs is the OKR module within Lattice, the performance management platform, founded 2015. Lattice last valued $3B (2022 Series F). Distinct from the dedicated Lattice performance product in our performance management ranking, this module focuses specifically on OKRs. Strengths: tight Lattice performance integration (OKR check-ins feed performance reviews), bundled with Lattice subscription (no separate purchase), modern UX inherited from Lattice, and growing OKR depth. Best fit for Lattice customers wanting OKRs bundled with performance management. Trade-offs: OKR depth below pure-play Quantive (Lattice prioritizes performance management over OKR depth), Lattice dependency creates lock-in, OKR module is not flagship product, and feature velocity follows Lattice product priorities rather than OKR-specific roadmap.

OKR module native to Asana project platform.

Asana Goals is the OKR module native to Asana, the project management platform, founded 2008. Public NYSE:ASAN since 2020. Distinct from the dedicated Asana project management product in our project management ranking, this module focuses specifically on OKRs anchored to Asana project execution. Strengths: tight Asana project integration (OKRs anchored to projects + tasks), bundled with Asana subscription (no separate purchase), modern UX inherited from Asana, and strong fit for Asana customers wanting OKR + project unified. Best fit for Asana customers wanting OKRs anchored to project execution. Trade-offs: OKR depth below pure-play Quantive (Asana prioritizes project management over OKR depth), Asana dependency creates lock-in, requires Asana Enterprise tier for full Goals features, and feature velocity follows Asana priorities rather than OKR-specific roadmap.

Bundled with Microsoft 365 E5, default for Microsoft customers.

Microsoft Viva Goals is the OKR module within Microsoft Viva, the employee experience platform, founded as Ally.io in 2018 and acquired by Microsoft in October 2021. Bundled with Microsoft 365 E5 or as standalone Viva Goals subscription. Strengths: tight Microsoft 365 integration (Teams, Outlook, Power BI), bundled with E5 (no separate purchase for E5 customers), public-co stability, mature alignment visualization inherited from Ally.io. Best fit for Microsoft 365 E5 customers wanting OKR module bundled with broader Viva employee experience. Trade-offs: OKR depth below pure-play Quantive, Microsoft dependency creates lock-in, requires E5 tier for full Viva features, AI features follow Microsoft Copilot priorities, and Ally.io integration consumed by Microsoft has slowed standalone product velocity.