Skip to content
Z Zendikt
Germany edition · 10 products ranked · Verified 2026-05-18

Top 10 OKR Software in Germany for 2026

Independent Germany OKR ranking, EUR pricing, Mooncamp and Workpath local champions, DSGVO and Mitbestimmung consent requirements for goal-tracking tools.

Germany verdict (TL;DR)

Verified 2026-05-18

Germany has the strongest local OKR ecosystem outside the US. Mooncamp (Cologne, German-built, DSGVO-native) ranks #1 for German buyers: EU data residency, German engineering culture, transparent pricing, and modern UX. Workpath (Frankfurt/Berlin, German-built, ~$10M+ funded, OKR + strategy execution) is the German enterprise choice and a credible Quantive alternative for DACH enterprises. Quantive and Lattice are used by German SaaS scaleups wanting global OKR platforms. Microsoft Viva Goals is the default for German enterprises on Microsoft 365 E5. The most important German-specific compliance requirement: Mitbestimmung (codetermination) requires Betriebsrat (works council) consent before deploying tools that monitor individual employee performance. OKR systems that track individual KR progress are typically subject to Betriebsvereinbarung (works agreement) before rollout at German companies with a Betriebsrat.

Picks for Germany

  • German mid-market wanting DSGVO-native OKR with modern UX (50-1,000 employees): mooncamp Cologne-built, DSGVO-native, EU data residency. Highest G2 rating in category (4.7). Transparent pricing at €8-€12/user/month. German engineering culture and local support. Best fit for German-first buyers.
  • German enterprise wanting local strategy-execution OKR (500-10,000 employees): workpath Frankfurt/Berlin-built enterprise OKR. DSGVO-native, EU data residency, SAP technology partnership. Consultative implementation with German labour law expertise. Best for DACH enterprises needing Betriebsvereinbarung support.
  • German SaaS scaleups and DACH tech-forward orgs wanting global OKR depth: quantive Pure-play OKR category leader. Used at German and DACH SaaS companies wanting global platform. EU data residency available. DSGVO DPA available. Deepest strategy-execution feature set.
  • German mid-market wanting OKR + performance bundled: profit-co OKR + performance + 1-on-1s at $7/user/month. EUR billing via European reseller. DSGVO-compliant DPA. Growing DACH adoption.
  • German Lattice customers: lattice-okrs OKR bundled with Lattice performance. German tech SaaS companies on Lattice get OKRs included. No separate purchase. Lattice EU data residency available.
  • German Microsoft 365 E5 enterprise customers: microsoft-viva-goals Bundled with Microsoft 365 E5. German enterprises on Microsoft E5 get Viva Goals at zero marginal cost. Microsoft Germany datacenter available. FedRAMP not required in Germany; EU data residency is.
Market context

How the okr software market looks in Germany

Germany is the only European market with two credible locally-built OKR platforms: Mooncamp (Cologne, founded 2018) and Workpath (Frankfurt, founded 2016). Both hold meaningful German and DACH installed bases, DSGVO-native design, and local implementation expertise. This makes Germany the OKR market with the strongest local alternatives to global platforms.

Mooncamp is the natural default for German and DACH tech mid-market (50-500 employees). Its combination of modern UX (consistently rated best-in-class UX in segment), DSGVO-native data residency, transparent pricing, and German engineering culture makes it the #1 choice for German buyers who do not need enterprise-grade strategy-execution depth. Its G2 rating (4.7) and Capterra rating (4.8) are the highest in the OKR category.

Workpath serves the German enterprise tier (500-10,000 employees) with consultative implementation and SAP partnership. Workpath's strength is Betriebsvereinbarung (works agreement) support: its implementation team is experienced navigating Mitbestimmung requirements for goal-monitoring tools, a capability global vendors (Quantive, Lattice) cannot replicate with the same depth.

The DACH SaaS ecosystem (B2B software companies headquartered in Germany, Austria, Switzerland) typically uses either Mooncamp (German-built, lower TCO) or Quantive (global platform, deeper strategy-execution) as the OKR layer. Lattice OKRs is growing in DACH among companies that adopted Lattice performance management as their people platform.

Compliance & local rules

DSGVO (GDPR in Germany) applies to all employee OKR and goal data. EU data residency is the default requirement for German enterprises. Mitbestimmung (codetermination): German companies with Betriebsrat (works council, required at 5+ employees with at least 5 eligible voters) must obtain Betriebsvereinbarung (works agreement) before deploying technology tools that monitor or evaluate individual employee performance, including OKR systems tracking individual KR progress. Section 87(1) No. 6 Betriebsverfassungsgesetz (BetrVG) requires codetermination on technical monitoring of employee behavior or performance. Betriebsrat-compliant OKR rollouts should distinguish between company-wide and team-level OKRs (typically lower risk) and individual contributor OKRs (typically require Betriebsvereinbarung). Workpath and Mooncamp have experience supporting Betriebsvereinbarung negotiations; global vendors have less German-labour-law depth. BDSG (Bundesdatenschutzgesetz, German Federal Data Protection Act) adds employee-data provisions beyond DSGVO/GDPR.

At a glance

Quick comparison, ranked for Germany

Product Best for Starts at 10-emp/mo* Pricing G2 Geo
2 Mooncamp
European tech-forward mid-market
$8 + $8/emp $88 4.7 Strongest in EU, UK; growing US
6 Workpath
European enterprises
Quote - 4.6 Strongest in DACH (Germany/Austria/Switzerland), EU; growing UK
1 Quantive
B2B SaaS + enterprise OKR-led orgs
$9 + $9/emp $99 4.4 Global; strongest in US, EU, UK
3 Profit.co
Mid-market wanting bundled depth
$0 $0 4.7 Global; strongest in US, India, EU
8 Lattice OKRs
Lattice customers
Quote - 4.6 Global; strongest in US, UK, EU
10 Microsoft Viva Goals
Microsoft 365 E5 customers
$57 + $57/emp $627 4.2 Global; aligned with Microsoft 365 availability
5 Perdoo
Mid-market wanting strategy-execution depth
$9 + $9/emp $99 4.6 Global; strongest in EU, US, UK
9 Asana Goals
Asana customers
$25 + $25/emp $275 4.4 Global; strongest in US, EU, UK, AU
4 Weekdone
SMB teams
$0 $0 4.5 Global; strongest in EU, US, UK
7 OKRify
Indian + South Asian mid-market
$0 $0 4.7 Strongest in India, Singapore, MENA; growing US/EU

*10-employee monthly cost = base fee + (per-employee × 10) using the lowest published tier. For opaque-pricing vendors, no value is shown.

Verified local pricing

What buyers in Germany actually pay

Median annual deal size by employee band, in EUR. Crowdsourced from anonymized buyer disclosures.

Product Employee band Median annual (EUR) Sample Notes
Mooncamp 50-200 employees €8,640 38 €8-€12/user/mo; EUR-native; DSGVO-native
Mooncamp 200-1,000 employees €26,000 18 Standard/Enterprise tier; EUR
Workpath 500-2,000 employees €35,000 14 Workpath Pro; EUR-native
Workpath 2,000-10,000 employees €85,000 10 Workpath Enterprise; DACH enterprises
Quantive 50-200 employees €10,500 18 Essentials tier; EUR-billed via DACH reseller
Microsoft Viva Goals Viva Goals standalone, 200-1,000 employees €6,480 14 €6/user/mo standalone; E5 bundle no extra cost
Local challengers

Germany-built or Germany-strong vendors worth knowing

Not yet ranked in our global top 10, but credible options for Germany buyers and worth a shortlist.

Mooncamp

Visit ↗

Cologne-built DSGVO-native OKR platform, founded 2018. EU data residency, transparent pricing (€8-€12/user/month), modern UX (G2 4.7). The #1 German-built OKR platform for mid-market. Direct Quantive alternative at 30-40% lower TCO. ~300+ DACH customers. Betriebsrat-aware implementation support.

Workpath

Visit ↗

Frankfurt/Berlin-built enterprise OKR + strategy execution platform, founded 2016, ~$10M+ funded. SAP technology partnership. DSGVO-native, EU data residency, Betriebsvereinbarung implementation experience. Best for DACH enterprises (500-10,000 employees) needing enterprise OKR with Mitbestimmung expertise. €30K-€300K/year enterprise pricing.

The Germany ranking

All 10, ranked for Germany

Same intelligence as the global ranking, vendor trust, review patterns, verified pricing, compliance, reordered for the Germany market.

#2

Mooncamp

European modern OKR platform with GDPR-first posture.

Founded 2018 · Cologne, Germany · private · 50–1,000 employees
G2 4.7 (180)
Capterra 4.8
From $8 + $8 /mo + /employee
● Transparent pricing

Mooncamp is the European modern OKR platform, founded 2018 in Cologne. Privately-held. The platform centers on OKR workflow + alignment + modern UX with GDPR-first posture. Strengths: GDPR-first design (data residency in EU), modern German engineering culture, transparent pricing, strong fit for European mid-market, and mature OKR cycle workflow. Best fit for European tech-forward mid-market wanting GDPR-native OKRs. Trade-offs: smaller installed base than Quantive, US presence limited, brand recognition lower outside EU, AI features lighter than Quantive, and feature breadth narrower at enterprise scale.

Best for

European tech-forward mid-market (50-1,000 employees) wanting GDPR-native OKR platform with modern UX and EU data residency.

Worst for

US enterprise (Quantive better presence), buyers needing strategy-execution depth (Quantive better), or bundled-OKR seekers.

Strengths

  • GDPR-first design with EU data residency
  • Modern German engineering culture
  • Transparent pricing
  • Strong fit for European mid-market
  • Mature OKR cycle workflow
  • Clean modern UX

Weaknesses

  • Smaller installed base than Quantive
  • US presence limited
  • Brand recognition lower outside EU
  • AI features lighter than Quantive
  • Feature breadth narrower at enterprise
  • Less suited for US enterprise

Pricing tiers

public
  • Essentials
    Per-user/month; basic OKRs
    $8+$8 /mo +/emp
  • Standard
    Per-user/month; full features
    $12+$12 /mo +/emp
  • Enterprise
    $15K-$60K/year for enterprise
    Quote
Watch for
  • · Per-seat scaling
  • · Annual price increases of 5-8%

Key features

  • +OKR cycle workflow
  • +Alignment visualization
  • +Cadence + check-ins
  • +GDPR-first data residency
  • +API access
  • +Reporting
  • +Templates
  • +50+ integrations
50+ integrations
SlackMicrosoft TeamsJiraAsanaHubSpotSalesforce
Geography
Strongest in EU, UK; growing US
#6

Workpath

Enterprise OKR for European mid-market with SAP partnership.

Founded 2016 · Frankfurt, Germany · private · 500–10,000 employees
G2 4.6 (120)
Capterra 4.6
Custom quote
○ Sales call required

Workpath is the enterprise OKR platform for European mid-market, founded 2016 in Frankfurt. Privately-held. The platform centers on enterprise-grade OKR + strategy execution with SAP technology partner relationship. Strengths: enterprise-grade OKR depth, SAP partnership (mature SAP integration), strong fit for German + EU enterprises, GDPR-first design, and consultative implementation services. Best fit for European enterprises ($500M+ revenue) wanting enterprise OKR with SAP integration. Trade-offs: pricing meaningful + opaque enterprise tiers, US presence limited, brand recognition lower outside EU, AI features below Quantive on velocity, and implementation services dependency.

Best for

European enterprises ($500M+ revenue, 1,000+ employees) wanting enterprise OKR with SAP integration and consultative implementation.

Worst for

US-only enterprises (Quantive better US presence), SMB (Weekdone simpler), or buyers wanting self-service onboarding.

Strengths

  • Enterprise-grade OKR depth
  • SAP technology partnership
  • Strong fit for German + EU enterprises
  • GDPR-first design
  • Consultative implementation services
  • Frankfurt + Berlin engineering

Weaknesses

  • Pricing meaningful + opaque
  • US presence limited
  • Brand recognition lower outside EU
  • AI features below Quantive
  • Implementation services dependency
  • Less suited for SMB

Pricing tiers

opaque
  • Workpath Pro
    ~$30K-$80K/year for mid-enterprise
    Quote
  • Workpath Enterprise
    $80K-$300K+/year for global enterprises
    Quote
Watch for
  • · Per-seat scaling
  • · Implementation services ($25K-$200K)
  • · Annual price increases of 6-10%

Key features

  • +Enterprise OKR cycle
  • +SAP integration
  • +Strategy execution
  • +Alignment + cascading
  • +Reporting dashboards
  • +Consultative services
  • +API access
  • +40+ integrations
40+ integrations
SAPMicrosoft TeamsJiraSlackSalesforceWorkday
Geography
Strongest in DACH (Germany/Austria/Switzerland), EU; growing UK
#1

Quantive

Modern pure-play OKR category leader with strategy execution depth.

Founded 2015 · Denver, CO / Sofia, Bulgaria · private · 200–5,000 employees
G2 4.4 (480)
Capterra 4.6
From $9 + $9 /mo + /employee
○ Sales call required

Quantive is the pure-play OKR category leader, founded 2015 as Gtmhub. Rebranded to Quantive in 2022 to signal expansion beyond pure OKRs into strategy execution. Last raised $120M Series C 2022. The platform centers on OKR cycle workflow + strategy-execution depth + multi-quarter initiative tracking. Strengths: deepest OKR cycle workflow in pure-play category, mature strategy-execution depth (multi-quarter initiatives, weighted KR scoring), AI features (Quantive AI for KR generation and progress sentiment), integration with major HRIS/performance/work-management platforms, and strong fit for orgs treating OKRs as dedicated workflow. Best fit for B2B SaaS mid-market and enterprise (200-5,000 employees) wanting OKR depth beyond bundled alternatives. Trade-offs: pricing meaningful + scales with seat count, bundled-OKR alternatives (Lattice, Asana, Microsoft) often included in existing subscriptions, customer support quality variable as company scaled, and Gtmhub-to-Quantive rebrand created brand recognition reset.

Best for

B2B SaaS mid-market + enterprise (200-5,000 employees) treating OKRs as dedicated strategy-execution workflow with multi-quarter initiative tracking needs.

Worst for

Orgs already on Lattice/Asana/Microsoft wanting OKRs bundled (use those modules), early-stage startups (Weekdone simpler), or budget-conscious teams.

Strengths

  • Deepest pure-play OKR cycle workflow
  • Mature strategy-execution depth
  • Quantive AI for KR generation
  • Integration with major platforms
  • Strong fit for OKR-dedicated orgs
  • Bulgarian + US engineering culture

Weaknesses

  • Pricing meaningful at scale
  • Bundled-OKR alternatives often free with existing tools
  • Customer support quality variable
  • Gtmhub rebrand created brand reset
  • Per-seat scaling at enterprise
  • Less suited for OKRs-as-bonus-feature buyers

Pricing tiers

opaque
  • Essentials
    Per-user/month; basic OKR features
    $9+$9 /mo +/emp
  • Scale
    ~$15K-$60K/year for mid-market
    Quote
  • Enterprise
    $60K-$200K+/year
    Quote
Watch for
  • · Per-seat scaling
  • · Implementation services ($10K-$80K)
  • · Annual price increases of 6-10%
  • · AI features at higher tiers

Key features

  • +OKR cycle workflow
  • +Strategy execution + multi-quarter initiatives
  • +Weighted KR scoring
  • +Quantive AI for KR generation
  • +Alignment visualization
  • +Cadence + check-in rituals
  • +API access
  • +100+ integrations
100+ integrations
SalesforceHubSpotAsanaJiraSlackMicrosoft Teams
Geography
Global; strongest in US, EU, UK
#3

Profit.co

Comprehensive OKR plus performance plus 1-on-1s combined.

Founded 2018 · Cupertino, CA · private · 100–2,000 employees
G2 4.7 (380)
Capterra 4.8
From $0 /mo
● Transparent pricing

Profit.co is the comprehensive OKR + performance + 1-on-1s combined platform, founded 2018. Privately-held. The platform bundles OKRs + performance reviews + 1-on-1 meetings + employee engagement + task management in one tool. Strengths: combined OKR + performance bundle (reduces tool sprawl), mature OKR workflow, comprehensive performance management features, transparent pricing, and strong fit for mid-market wanting bundled depth. Best fit for mid-market companies wanting OKR + performance + 1-on-1s bundled without buying separate Lattice/Quantive subscriptions. Trade-offs: feature depth below specialists in each dimension (no single dimension is best-in-class), UX dense (comprehensive features create complexity), and brand recognition lower than category leaders.

Best for

Mid-market companies (100-2,000 employees) wanting OKR + performance reviews + 1-on-1s bundled in one platform.

Worst for

OKR-only buyers (Quantive better depth), enterprise needing best-in-class (separate Lattice + Quantive better), or bundled-with-existing-tool seekers.

Strengths

  • Combined OKR + performance + 1-on-1s
  • Reduces tool sprawl
  • Mature OKR workflow
  • Comprehensive performance features
  • Transparent pricing
  • Strong fit for mid-market wanting depth bundled

Weaknesses

  • Feature depth below specialists
  • UX dense with comprehensive features
  • Brand recognition lower
  • AI features below Quantive
  • No best-in-class dimension
  • Learning curve steeper

Pricing tiers

public
  • Launch
    Free for up to 5 users
    $0 /mo
  • Growth
    Per-user/month; OKR + performance
    $7+$7 /mo +/emp
  • Enterprise
    $15K-$60K/year
    Quote
Watch for
  • · Per-seat scaling
  • · Annual price increases of 5-8%
  • · AI features at higher tiers

Key features

  • +OKR cycle workflow
  • +Performance reviews
  • +1-on-1 meetings
  • +Employee engagement
  • +Task management
  • +Alignment visualization
  • +API access
  • +60+ integrations
60+ integrations
SlackMicrosoft TeamsJiraAsanaHubSpotSalesforce
Geography
Global; strongest in US, India, EU
#8

Lattice OKRs

Lattice performance suite OKR module, default for Lattice customers.

Founded 2015 · San Francisco, CA · private · 50–2,000 employees
G2 4.6 (540)
Capterra 4.7
Custom quote
○ Sales call required

Lattice OKRs is the OKR module within Lattice, the performance management platform, founded 2015. Lattice last valued $3B (2022 Series F). Distinct from the dedicated Lattice performance product in our performance management ranking, this module focuses specifically on OKRs. Strengths: tight Lattice performance integration (OKR check-ins feed performance reviews), bundled with Lattice subscription (no separate purchase), modern UX inherited from Lattice, and growing OKR depth. Best fit for Lattice customers wanting OKRs bundled with performance management. Trade-offs: OKR depth below pure-play Quantive (Lattice prioritizes performance management over OKR depth), Lattice dependency creates lock-in, OKR module is not flagship product, and feature velocity follows Lattice product priorities rather than OKR-specific roadmap.

Best for

Lattice performance management customers (50-2,000 employees) wanting OKRs bundled with performance reviews and 1-on-1 workflow.

Worst for

Non-Lattice customers (Quantive standalone better), OKR-only depth (Quantive better), or buyers wanting pure-play OKR-first design.

Strengths

  • Tight Lattice performance integration
  • Bundled with Lattice subscription
  • Modern UX inherited from Lattice
  • Strong fit for Lattice customers
  • OKR + performance unified workflow
  • Growing OKR depth

Weaknesses

  • OKR depth below pure-play Quantive
  • Lattice dependency creates lock-in
  • OKR module is not flagship
  • Feature velocity follows Lattice priorities
  • Less suited for non-Lattice customers
  • Bundled-with-existing-tool limits standalone choice

Pricing tiers

opaque
  • Lattice Performance + OKR
    Combined subscription; ~$11-$20/user/month
    Quote
  • Lattice Enterprise
    $30K-$200K+/year
    Quote
Watch for
  • · Lattice subscription required
  • · Per-seat scaling
  • · Annual price increases of 5-8%

Key features

  • +OKR cycle workflow
  • +Lattice performance integration
  • +Check-ins for OKR
  • +Alignment visualization
  • +Reporting
  • +1-on-1 meetings
  • +API access
  • +60+ integrations
60+ integrations
SlackMicrosoft TeamsJiraAsanaBambooHRWorkday
Geography
Global; strongest in US, UK, EU
#10

Microsoft Viva Goals

Bundled with Microsoft 365 E5, default for Microsoft customers.

Founded 2018 · Redmond, WA · public · 200–500,000+ employees
G2 4.2 (280)
Capterra 4.3
From $57 + $57 /mo + /employee
● Transparent pricing

Microsoft Viva Goals is the OKR module within Microsoft Viva, the employee experience platform, founded as Ally.io in 2018 and acquired by Microsoft in October 2021. Bundled with Microsoft 365 E5 or as standalone Viva Goals subscription. Strengths: tight Microsoft 365 integration (Teams, Outlook, Power BI), bundled with E5 (no separate purchase for E5 customers), public-co stability, mature alignment visualization inherited from Ally.io. Best fit for Microsoft 365 E5 customers wanting OKR module bundled with broader Viva employee experience. Trade-offs: OKR depth below pure-play Quantive, Microsoft dependency creates lock-in, requires E5 tier for full Viva features, AI features follow Microsoft Copilot priorities, and Ally.io integration consumed by Microsoft has slowed standalone product velocity.

Best for

Microsoft 365 E5 customers (200-10,000 employees) wanting OKR module bundled with broader Viva employee experience platform.

Worst for

Non-Microsoft customers (Quantive standalone better), Microsoft 365 Business/E3 customers (Viva Goals requires E5 or standalone), or OKR depth seekers.

Strengths

  • Tight Microsoft 365 integration
  • Bundled with E5
  • Public-co stability
  • Mature alignment visualization
  • Power BI reporting integration
  • Strong fit for Microsoft-anchored orgs

Weaknesses

  • OKR depth below Quantive
  • Microsoft dependency creates lock-in
  • Requires E5 for full features
  • Ally.io velocity slowed post-Microsoft
  • AI follows Copilot priorities not OKR-specific
  • Standalone Viva Goals less compelling without E5

Pricing tiers

public
  • Microsoft 365 E5 (bundled)
    Includes Viva Goals + full E5 features
    $57+$57 /mo +/emp
  • Viva Goals standalone
    Per-user/month standalone
    $6+$6 /mo +/emp
  • Viva Suite standalone
    Includes Goals + Insights + Engage + Learning
    $12+$12 /mo +/emp
Watch for
  • · E5 license required for full bundle
  • · Per-seat scaling
  • · Annual price increases of 5-8%

Key features

  • +OKR cycle workflow
  • +Microsoft 365 integration
  • +Teams integration
  • +Power BI reporting
  • +Alignment visualization
  • +Cadence + check-ins
  • +API access (Microsoft Graph)
  • +300+ integrations
300+ integrations
Microsoft TeamsOutlookPower BIAzure DevOpsJiraSalesforce
Geography
Global; aligned with Microsoft 365 availability
#5

Perdoo

Long-running OKR with strategy maps and KPI tracking.

Founded 2014 · Amsterdam, Netherlands · private · 50–1,000 employees
G2 4.6 (280)
Capterra 4.6
From $9 + $9 /mo + /employee
● Transparent pricing

Perdoo is the long-running OKR platform with strategy maps, founded 2014 in Amsterdam. Privately-held. The platform differentiates with strategy maps (visualizing the relationship between objectives, KRs, and KPIs) and dual KPI + KR tracking. Strengths: strategy maps for execution visualization, mature OKR workflow since 2014, dual KPI + KR tracking, strong fit for orgs wanting strategy-execution depth without Quantive pricing, Amsterdam engineering culture. Best fit for mid-market wanting strategy-execution visualization beyond simple OKR tracking. Trade-offs: AI features below Quantive, smaller installed base, brand recognition lower than category leaders, and feature breadth narrower at enterprise.

Best for

Mid-market companies (50-1,000 employees) wanting strategy-execution depth + KPI + OKR combined visualization without Quantive pricing.

Worst for

Simple OKR-only needs (Weekdone better), enterprise depth (Quantive better), or bundled-OKR seekers.

Strengths

  • Strategy maps for execution visualization
  • Mature OKR workflow since 2014
  • Dual KPI + KR tracking
  • Strong fit for strategy-execution depth
  • Amsterdam engineering culture
  • Transparent pricing

Weaknesses

  • AI features below Quantive
  • Smaller installed base
  • Brand recognition lower
  • Feature breadth narrower at enterprise
  • UX feels older than Mooncamp
  • Less suited for bundled-OKR seekers

Pricing tiers

public
  • Premium
    Per-user/month
    $9+$9 /mo +/emp
  • Supreme
    $12K-$48K/year for enterprise
    Quote
Watch for
  • · Per-seat scaling
  • · Annual price increases of 5-8%

Key features

  • +OKR cycle workflow
  • +Strategy maps
  • +KPI tracking
  • +Alignment visualization
  • +Cadence + check-ins
  • +Reporting
  • +API access
  • +40+ integrations
40+ integrations
SlackMicrosoft TeamsJiraAsanaGoogle WorkspaceSalesforce
Geography
Global; strongest in EU, US, UK
#9

Asana Goals

OKR module native to Asana project platform.

Founded 2008 · San Francisco, CA · public · 50–2,000 employees
G2 4.4 (1,880)
Capterra 4.5
From $25 + $25 /mo + /employee
● Transparent pricing

Asana Goals is the OKR module native to Asana, the project management platform, founded 2008. Public NYSE:ASAN since 2020. Distinct from the dedicated Asana project management product in our project management ranking, this module focuses specifically on OKRs anchored to Asana project execution. Strengths: tight Asana project integration (OKRs anchored to projects + tasks), bundled with Asana subscription (no separate purchase), modern UX inherited from Asana, and strong fit for Asana customers wanting OKR + project unified. Best fit for Asana customers wanting OKRs anchored to project execution. Trade-offs: OKR depth below pure-play Quantive (Asana prioritizes project management over OKR depth), Asana dependency creates lock-in, requires Asana Enterprise tier for full Goals features, and feature velocity follows Asana priorities rather than OKR-specific roadmap.

Best for

Asana customers (50-2,000 employees) wanting OKRs anchored to project execution with task-level traceability.

Worst for

Non-Asana customers (Quantive standalone better), OKR-only depth (Quantive better), or buyers wanting pure-play OKR-first design.

Strengths

  • Tight Asana project integration
  • Bundled with Asana subscription
  • Modern UX inherited from Asana
  • Strong fit for Asana customers
  • OKR + project unified workflow
  • Public-co stability

Weaknesses

  • OKR depth below pure-play Quantive
  • Asana dependency creates lock-in
  • Requires Asana Enterprise tier for full features
  • Feature velocity follows Asana priorities
  • OKR module is not flagship
  • Less suited for non-Asana customers

Pricing tiers

public
  • Asana Business
    Per-user/month; basic Goals
    $25+$25 /mo +/emp
  • Asana Enterprise
    Full Goals features; $30-50/user/month
    Quote
  • Asana Enterprise+
    Custom pricing
    Quote
Watch for
  • · Per-seat scaling
  • · Annual pricing only at higher tiers
  • · Annual price increases of 5-8%

Key features

  • +OKR cycle workflow (Goals)
  • +Asana project integration
  • +Task-level traceability
  • +Alignment visualization
  • +Reporting
  • +Cadence + check-ins
  • +API access
  • +270+ integrations
270+ integrations
SlackMicrosoft TeamsSalesforceHubSpotGoogle WorkspaceZoom
Geography
Global; strongest in US, EU, UK, AU
#4

Weekdone

Simple OKR plus weekly check-ins for SMB teams.

Founded 2013 · Tartu, Estonia · private · 10–200 employees
G2 4.5 (240)
Capterra 4.5
From $0 /mo
● Transparent pricing

Weekdone is the simple OKR + weekly check-ins platform, founded 2013 in Tartu. Privately-held, profitable per public statements. The platform centers on lightweight OKR cycle workflow + weekly PPP (Plans, Progress, Problems) check-ins. Strengths: simple OKR cycle workflow, mature weekly check-in ritual, Estonian engineering culture, transparent affordable pricing, profitable execution since 2018. Best fit for SMB teams wanting lightweight OKR cadence without enterprise feature breadth. Trade-offs: feature depth below Quantive, AI features lighter, smaller installed base, less suited for strategy-execution depth, and brand recognition lower.

Best for

SMB teams (10-200 employees) wanting lightweight OKR + weekly check-in rhythm without enterprise feature breadth.

Worst for

Enterprise OKR programs (Quantive better), strategy-execution depth (Quantive/Perdoo better), or bundled-OKR seekers.

Strengths

  • Simple OKR cycle workflow
  • Mature weekly PPP check-ins
  • Estonian engineering culture
  • Transparent affordable pricing
  • Profitable execution since 2018
  • Strong fit for SMB lightweight cadence

Weaknesses

  • Feature depth below Quantive
  • AI features lighter
  • Smaller installed base
  • Less suited for strategy execution depth
  • Brand recognition lower
  • UX dated relative to Mooncamp

Pricing tiers

public
  • Free
    Up to 3 users; full features
    $0 /mo
  • Standard
    Per-user/month
    $6+$6 /mo +/emp
  • Pro
    $5K-$24K/year for enterprise
    Quote
Watch for
  • · Per-seat scaling
  • · Annual price increases of 5-8%

Key features

  • +OKR cycle workflow
  • +Weekly PPP check-ins
  • +Quarterly reviews
  • +Alignment visualization
  • +Reporting dashboards
  • +Templates
  • +API access
  • +30+ integrations
30+ integrations
SlackMicrosoft TeamsJiraAsanaGoogle WorkspaceTrello
Geography
Global; strongest in EU, US, UK
#7

OKRify

Indian-built affordable OKR for SMB and South Asian mid-market.

Founded 2019 · Bangalore, India · private · 50–500 employees
G2 4.7 (140)
Capterra 4.8
From $0 /mo
● Transparent pricing

OKRify is the Indian-built affordable OKR platform, founded 2019 in Bangalore. Privately-held. The platform centers on affordable OKR + 1-on-1s + check-ins for Indian and South Asian mid-market with INR-native pricing. Strengths: INR-native pricing, mature OKR cycle workflow, Indian engineering culture, strong fit for Indian mid-market, and competitive feature set at SMB pricing. Best fit for Indian + South Asian mid-market wanting OKR at INR-native pricing. Trade-offs: brand recognition limited outside India, smaller installed base globally, feature breadth narrower at enterprise, and less suited for global enterprises with multi-currency complexity.

Best for

Indian + South Asian mid-market companies (50-500 employees) wanting OKR + 1-on-1s + check-ins at INR-native pricing.

Worst for

US/EU enterprises (Quantive/Workpath better), global multi-entity OKR programs, or buyers needing Western brand recognition.

Strengths

  • INR-native pricing
  • Mature OKR cycle workflow
  • Indian engineering culture
  • Strong fit for Indian mid-market
  • Competitive feature set at SMB pricing
  • Affordable for emerging markets

Weaknesses

  • Brand recognition limited outside India
  • Smaller installed base globally
  • Feature breadth narrower at enterprise
  • Less suited for global multi-currency
  • AI features below Quantive
  • Limited Western customer references

Pricing tiers

public
  • Free
    Up to 5 users
    $0 /mo
  • Pro
    Per-user/month (~₹240)
    $3+$3 /mo +/emp
  • Enterprise
    Custom INR pricing for enterprise
    Quote
Watch for
  • · Per-seat scaling
  • · Annual price increases of 5-8%

Key features

  • +OKR cycle workflow
  • +1-on-1 meetings
  • +Weekly check-ins
  • +Alignment visualization
  • +Performance reviews
  • +Templates
  • +API access
  • +30+ integrations
30+ integrations
SlackMicrosoft TeamsJiraAsanaGoogle Workspace
Geography
Strongest in India, Singapore, MENA; growing US/EU

Frequently asked questions

The questions buyers actually ask before they sign.

Does our Betriebsrat need to approve our OKR software?
Very likely yes if the OKR tool tracks individual employee KR progress. Section 87(1) No. 6 BetrVG gives the Betriebsrat codetermination rights on technical monitoring of employee behavior or performance. An OKR system that records individual goal progress, check-in data, and performance trend creates a monitoring record subject to codetermination. Best practice: negotiate a Betriebsvereinbarung before rollout, covering data categories tracked, access rights, retention periods, and deletion obligations. Workpath and Mooncamp have implementation experience supporting Betriebsvereinbarung negotiations. If you run team-level and company-level OKRs without individual contributor tracking, the Betriebsrat risk is lower but should still be assessed with German labour counsel.
Mooncamp vs Quantive for a 200-person German SaaS company?
Mooncamp wins on German fit: DSGVO-native data residency, German engineering culture, local support, Betriebsrat-aware implementation, and ~30% lower TCO. Mooncamp at €8-€12/user/month (~€26,000/year for 200 employees) vs Quantive Essentials (~€10,500/year at 50-200 band; scales to ~€30,000 for 200). Quantive wins on strategy-execution depth: multi-quarter initiative tracking, weighted KR scoring, Quantive AI, and 100+ integrations vs Mooncamp's 50+. For a German SaaS at 200 employees without complex multi-quarter OKR programs, Mooncamp is the right answer. At 500+ employees with board-level strategy-execution OKR depth requirements, evaluate Quantive or Workpath.
Is Workpath the right choice for a DACH enterprise at 2,000+ employees?
Yes, if SAP integration or Betriebsvereinbarung implementation expertise is a requirement. Workpath is the only German-built OKR platform with SAP technology partnership and consultative implementation services experienced in DACH codetermination. Its enterprise OKR depth (strategy execution, multi-quarter initiatives, alignment reporting) is competitive with Quantive at the DACH enterprise tier. Trade-offs: pricing is opaque and meaningful (€85,000+/year at 2,000+ employees), US presence is limited, and AI feature velocity is below Quantive. If SAP integration and local Mitbestimmung expertise matter, Workpath. If global OKR depth and AI features matter more, Quantive with a qualified DACH implementation partner.
Should I buy a standalone OKR tool or use a bundled module?
Bundled modules (Lattice OKRs, Asana Goals, Microsoft Viva Goals) are usually the right answer if you already pay for the parent platform. They are free incrementally, integrate natively with your existing workflow, and remove a separate vendor relationship. Standalone tools (Quantive, Mooncamp, Profit.co) become the right answer when (1) you need strategy-execution depth beyond what bundled modules provide; (2) you do not use Lattice/Asana/Microsoft; (3) you treat OKRs as a dedicated workflow with weekly cadence rituals that the bundled modules cannot match. Most B2B SaaS at $50M+ revenue evaluates: do I need OKR depth, or OKR included with my existing tool.
Why is Quantive (Gtmhub) the pure-play category leader?
Quantive built OKR-first software from 2015, expanded into strategy execution 2020-2024, and renamed Gtmhub to Quantive in 2022 to signal the broader scope. The depth advantage over bundled modules is: (1) multi-quarter strategy initiatives that span OKR cycles; (2) weighted KR scoring that better matches enterprise OKR rituals; (3) AI-generated KRs from objective text; (4) mature reporting that bundled modules treat as add-on. The trade-off is per-seat pricing that scales fast at enterprise. Buyers should compare Quantive depth against Lattice/Asana/Microsoft bundled features and decide if the depth is worth the separate subscription.
What happened with Ally.io after Microsoft acquired it?
Microsoft acquired Ally.io in October 2021 and rebranded it to Microsoft Viva Goals in 2022. Practitioner reports through 2024-2026 indicate product velocity has slowed visibly as the team integrated into the broader Microsoft Viva product. AI features now follow Microsoft Copilot priorities rather than OKR-specific roadmap. For customers wanting modern AI-driven OKR features, this trajectory matters. Buyers on Microsoft 365 E5 still get Viva Goals bundled (so the value is high if you already pay for E5), but for standalone OKR depth, Quantive has pulled ahead since the acquisition.
How do OKRs differ from KPIs and how does Perdoo handle the distinction?
OKRs (objectives + key results) are aspirational, time-bound, and stretch-oriented, typically 60-70% achievement is considered successful. KPIs (key performance indicators) are operational, ongoing, and tracking-oriented, typically you want 100% on target. Most B2B orgs need both: OKRs for quarterly strategic priorities, KPIs for ongoing operational health. Perdoo uniquely separates them in its data model, OKRs track ambitious goals, KPIs track operational metrics, and Strategy Maps visualize how they relate. Quantive and other tools usually conflate them into "metrics" without explicit distinction. The Perdoo approach is more methodologically pure but adds complexity buyers should evaluate.
Are OKRs being absorbed by performance management software?
Substantially yes. The 2022-2026 trend: Lattice, 15Five, Culture Amp, Workday Talent all built OKR modules that compete with standalone OKR tools. Many B2B SaaS orgs that started with standalone Quantive or Gtmhub migrated to Lattice OKRs (when they were already buying Lattice for performance). The absorption is most aggressive in mid-market (50-2,000 employees). Pure-play OKR vendors (Quantive, Mooncamp, Profit.co) compete by offering strategy-execution depth that bundled modules do not match, multi-quarter initiatives, weighted KR scoring, deeper alignment visualization. The pure-play category is not dying, but the addressable market is shrinking as bundled alternatives mature.
How do I evaluate vendor stability for an OKR tool?
OKR tool contracts are typically annual with moderate switching cost (OKR data export to CSV is standard; rebuild cadence in new tool). Before committing: (1) check funding/profitability status (Quantive Series C 2022, Profit.co bootstrapped profitable, Weekdone profitable; Mooncamp + Perdoo + Workpath funding less visible); (2) review feature velocity vs bundled alternatives (Lattice OKRs, Asana Goals, Microsoft Viva Goals all improving fast); (3) confirm AI feature roadmap (KR generation, progress sentiment, alignment automation); (4) negotiate annual contracts only after 90 days of validated usage. Microsoft Viva Goals post-Ally.io has slowed innovation; Lattice OKRs is improving fast as Lattice valuation pressure drives feature velocity.
When should I NOT implement OKRs?
Honest editorial take: many orgs that implement OKR software do not need OKRs at all. OKRs require organizational rhythm (weekly check-ins, quarterly reviews, exec sponsorship) that smaller orgs cannot sustain. If your team is under 50 people without dedicated chief-of-staff or operations function, OKRs often become busywork. If your org has frequent strategic pivots, OKRs feel stale within weeks of being set. If leadership does not model OKR rigor (resetting their own OKRs when priorities change), the methodology degrades. Better alternatives for those contexts: V2MOM (Salesforce-style), 4DX (Stephen Covey), or simply quarterly priorities lists without methodology overhead. Buying OKR software does not create OKR culture.
Can I use Notion or Linear for OKRs instead of dedicated software?
For sub-50-person teams: yes, often. Notion + a goals database template + manual quarterly cadence works for early-stage orgs and is materially cheaper. Linear has built-in initiatives and projects that approximate OKRs. The functional gap shows up at 100+ people: bundled cadence rituals, alignment visualization across teams, exec-level rollup reporting, and AI-driven KR generation become non-trivial without dedicated tooling. The honest read: tools matter less than rhythm. A team running weekly OKR check-ins in Notion will outperform a team with Quantive but no rhythm. Adopt the methodology first, then layer in tooling when manual overhead becomes prohibitive.

Final word

Looking at a different market? See the global OKR Software ranking, or pick another country at the top of this page.

Last updated 2026-05-18. Local pricing reverified quarterly. Found something inaccurate? Tell us.