Skip to content
Z Zendikt
United States edition · 10 products ranked · Verified 2026-05-23

Top 10 Video Marketing and Hosting Software in the United States for 2026

US ranking: video marketing and hosting, USD pricing, B2B sales video vs marketing hosting vs OTT split; post-Loom-acquisition fit for 2026.

United States verdict (TL;DR)

Verified 2026-05-23

Vidyard remains the default US B2B sales video pick (Salesforce, HubSpot, Outreach, Salesloft signal capture). Wistia is the marketing-led brand hosting reference and the most stable bootstrapped vendor in the category. Loom (now Atlassian, post-October-2023 $975M acquisition) is the obvious pick inside US Atlassian-anchored orgs and a more complicated call everywhere else. Brightcove, Kaltura, and JW Player are the three US-public OTT vendors (NASDAQ:BCOV, NASDAQ:KLTR, NYSE-adjacent JW); all three are mature with muted growth and US enterprise install bases at Fortune 500 media, broadcast, and higher-ed. Vimeo Business (NASDAQ:VMEO) is post-SPAC and post-Anjali-Sud, pivoting back to enterprise with revenue deceleration. FedRAMP is the live procurement question for US federal video buyers: Brightcove and Kaltura have the deepest public-sector references; Loom inherits Atlassian Cloud FedRAMP scope; nobody else here is FedRAMP-authorized as of Q1 2026.

Picks for United States

  • US B2B sales and revenue video at scale (Salesforce, HubSpot, Outreach, Salesloft anchored): vidyard Kitchener-based, US-revenue-heavy. Deepest CRM and revenue-tool signal capture in the category. $80M+ raised, profitability progress reported through 2025, no layoffs in 2024-2025. The textbook US B2B SaaS sales-video pick.
  • US marketing teams running gated content and MAP-anchored hosting: wistia Cambridge MA, bootstrapped, took on debt in 2017 to buy back investors. Mature HubSpot, Marketo, Pardot integrations. Most stable vendor-trust profile in the category. Wistia AI shipped 2024 without disrupting the core promise.
  • US Atlassian Cloud-anchored orgs wanting async video baked into Jira and Confluence: loom Acquired by Atlassian October 2023 for $975M. Integrated into Atlassian Cloud through 2024-2025. The right call inside Atlassian shops; the wrong call for buyers who picked Loom specifically because it was independent.
  • US enterprise OTT, broadcast, and live streaming (Fortune 500 media): brightcove Boston-headquartered, NASDAQ:BCOV, mature OTT with deep US broadcast references. Live streaming, monetization (ads, subscription, pay-per-view), broadcast-grade workflows. Stock is flat and revenue growth muted but the install base is real.
  • US higher-education and large-enterprise video portals: kaltura NY-headquartered (Israeli origin), NASDAQ:KLTR. Dominant in US higher-ed (large state university systems) and large enterprise video. Stock down roughly 85 percent from 2021 IPO peak; the product is mature, the financial trajectory is the procurement risk to flag.
  • US outbound SDR teams running modern personalized video at moderate volume: sendspark Miami-headquartered, Y Combinator. Modern prospecting-UX, AI personalization. Best for US SDR teams who find Vidyard too heavy and Loom too generic for outbound prospecting.
  • US SMB sales and customer success running one-to-one personalized video: bonjoro Sydney-headquartered with strong US SMB customer base. Specialist for personalized one-to-one sales and onboarding videos. The volume tool for small revenue teams that ship dozens of personalized videos per day.
Market context

How the video marketing and hosting software market looks in United States

The US is the origin and largest revenue market for the category. Vidyard (Kitchener, US-revenue-heavy), Wistia (Cambridge MA, bootstrapped since 2006), Loom (San Francisco, now Atlassian-owned), Brightcove (Boston, NASDAQ:BCOV), Kaltura (NY-headquartered, NASDAQ:KLTR), Vimeo (NY, NASDAQ:VMEO), JW Player (NY, deep OTT), Sendspark (Miami), and Tella (London-headquartered but US-heavy customer base) all sell heavily into US accounts. The US Fortune 500 buyer split runs cleanly: B2B revenue teams buy Vidyard, marketing buys Wistia or Vimeo Business, IT-led collaboration buys Loom (especially inside Atlassian-anchored stacks), and media, broadcast, and higher-ed buy Brightcove, Kaltura, or JW Player.

The single largest 2026 context for US buyers is the post-acquisition behavior of Loom inside Atlassian. Loom shipped through October 2023 as an independent async-video pure-play with a strong PLG motion. Atlassian's $975M acquisition is now visible in the product: Jira and Confluence integrations are deeper, Atlassian Cloud SSO is the default identity layer, and the standalone Loom procurement motion is being absorbed into Atlassian Cloud enterprise contracts. US buyers who picked Loom because it was independent and not in a collaboration suite now face a real question: keep Loom inside an Atlassian-anchored stack, or move to Vidyard, Sendspark, or Tella for an independent option. US fintech, healthtech, and federal-adjacent buyers who do not want a collaboration-suite dependency are the most likely movers.

Vimeo's public-market story is the second material US context. Vimeo went public via SPAC in 2021 at peak valuation, Anjali Sud departed in August 2023, revenue has decelerated, and the company is pivoting back toward enterprise after years of trying to be a creator platform. The Vimeo brand is still strong in US marketing teams who picked it for ad-free hosting and clean players in the late 2010s, but the renewal conversation in 2026 is harder than it used to be. Wistia's bootstrapped capital structure (took on debt in 2017 to buy back investors and run independent) is a credible counter-positioning argument that wins US marketing renewals against Vimeo.

FedRAMP and the federal video market: Brightcove and Kaltura have the deepest US public sector and federal-adjacent references in this ranking; Brightcove powers significant US government video deployments and Kaltura has Department of Defense and large state government references. Loom inherits Atlassian Cloud FedRAMP scope (Atlassian Government Cloud is FedRAMP Moderate). Vidyard, Wistia, Vimeo Business, JW Player, Sendspark, Tella, and Bonjoro are not FedRAMP-authorized as of Q1 2026. US federal buyers should verify current authorization status before procurement.

Compliance & local rules

SOC 2 Type II: Vidyard, Wistia, Brightcove, Kaltura, JW Player, Vimeo Business, and Loom all hold current SOC 2 Type II attestations as of Q1 2026; Sendspark, Tella, and Bonjoro are smaller and SOC 2 status should be verified per-deal. FedRAMP: Brightcove and Kaltura have the strongest US public-sector references; Loom inherits Atlassian Government Cloud FedRAMP Moderate scope; no other vendor in this ranking holds FedRAMP authorization. HIPAA: Brightcove and Kaltura offer HIPAA BAA at enterprise tier for US healthcare and life sciences video; Wistia and Vidyard offer HIPAA BAA on Advanced and Business tiers respectively; verify before any PHI-adjacent deployment. CCPA and CPRA: California visitor video viewing data is personal information; consent and deletion APIs must propagate to vendor-side analytics. Vidyard, Wistia, Loom, and Brightcove all provide documented CCPA deletion workflows. COPPA: video platforms hosting content directed at US under-13 audiences require verifiable parental consent before behavioral analytics activation; this is a real constraint for US edtech and children-content publishers using Brightcove, Kaltura, or Vimeo Business. FTC Section 5: AI Avatar and synthetic-video personalization (Vidyard, Sendspark, Loom AI features) require disclosure to US recipients to avoid deceptive-practice exposure; FTC guidance on AI-generated content disclosure is evolving and US legal teams should review vendor AI feature documentation.

At a glance

Quick comparison, ranked for United States

Product Best for Starts at 10-emp/mo* Pricing G2 Geo
1 Vidyard
B2B sales and revenue teams anchored on Salesforce or HubSpot
$0 $0 4.5 Global; strongest in US, Canada, UK, EU, ANZ
2 Wistia
Marketing teams anchored on gated content and MAP
$0 $0 4.4 Global; strongest in US, Canada, UK, EU, ANZ
3 Loom
Atlassian-anchored organizations and engineering / product teams
$0 $0 4.6 Global; strongest in US, UK, EU, ANZ, India
6 Brightcove
Media, broadcast, and large enterprise video and OTT
Quote - 4.2 Global; strongest in US, UK, EU, APAC, LATAM
7 Kaltura
Higher-education and large enterprise video portals
Quote - 4.2 Global; strongest in US, EU, ANZ, Middle East
8 Vimeo Business
SMB to enterprise; broad horizontal video platform
$0 $0 4.3 Global; strongest in US, UK, EU, ANZ, LATAM
10 JW Player
Publishers, broadcasters, OTT operators, large media
Quote - 4.2 Global; strongest in US, UK, EU, APAC, LATAM
5 Sendspark
Outbound SDR teams running AI-personalized video prospecting
$0 $0 4.7 Global; strongest in US, Canada, UK, EU
9 Tella
Creator-anchored teams, design-heavy marketing, small B2B
$0 $0 4.7 Global; strongest in UK, US, EU
4 Bonjoro
SMB and mid-market sales, customer success, onboarding teams
$0 $0 4.7 Global; strongest in ANZ, US, UK, EU

*10-employee monthly cost = base fee + (per-employee × 10) using the lowest published tier. For opaque-pricing vendors, no value is shown.

Verified local pricing

What buyers in United States actually pay

Median annual deal size by employee band, in USD. Crowdsourced from anonymized buyer disclosures.

Product Employee band Median annual (USD) Sample Notes
Vidyard 50-500 employees $12,000 72 Pro or Plus tier; USD; annual contract typical
Vidyard 500-5,000 employees $94,000 48 Business tier; USD; SSO, full team rollout
Wistia 10-200 employees $4,800 114 Pro tier; USD; published list pricing
Wistia 200-2,000 employees $32,000 67 Advanced or Premium tier; USD; bandwidth caps
Loom 50-1,000 employees $18,000 88 Business tier; USD; Atlassian Cloud bundle pricing increasingly common
Brightcove 500-5,000 employees $145,000 36 Enterprise tier; USD; quote-only; broadcast and OTT workloads
Kaltura Higher-ed (10,000+ FTE) $210,000 22 Enterprise; USD; multi-year university contracts
Vimeo Business 50-500 employees $9,600 94 Vimeo Business or Advanced; USD; annual
Local challengers

United States-built or United States-strong vendors worth knowing

Not yet ranked in our global top 10, but credible options for United States buyers and worth a shortlist.

Vidyard (Kitchener, US-revenue-heavy)

Visit ↗

Canadian-headquartered but US-customer-base-dominant. The US B2B sales video reference. Salesforce, HubSpot, Outreach, Salesloft native. $80M+ raised across Bessemer, Battery, OMERS Ventures, BDC. The independent option in a consolidating category.

Wistia (Cambridge MA)

Visit ↗

US-headquartered, bootstrapped since 2006, took on debt in 2017 to buy back early investors and stay independent. One of the most cited vendor-trust events in US B2B SaaS history. Wistia AI shipped 2024. The most stable independent vendor in the category for US marketing buyers.

Loom (Atlassian, San Francisco)

Visit ↗

US-headquartered, acquired by Atlassian October 2023 for $975M. Now integrated into Atlassian Cloud. Best for US Atlassian-anchored orgs; the standalone Loom procurement motion is being absorbed into Atlassian Cloud enterprise contracts. Buyers who picked Loom for its independence have a real renewal question in 2026.

The United States ranking

All 10, ranked for United States

Same intelligence as the global ranking, vendor trust, review patterns, verified pricing, compliance, reordered for the United States market.

#1

Vidyard

B2B sales and revenue video leader with the deepest CRM signal capture in the category.

Founded 2010 · Kitchener, ON, Canada · private · 50-5,000 employees
G2 4.5 (820)
Capterra 4.5
From $0 /mo
◐ Partial disclosure
Visit Vidyard

Vidyard is the most mature platform for async sales video and revenue-anchored use cases in 2026. Founded 2010 in Kitchener (Ontario, Canada), Vidyard has raised over $80M across multiple rounds (Bessemer, Battery, OMERS Ventures, BDC, others) and stayed focused on B2B sales rather than chasing the creator market or the OTT market. The product covers screen and webcam recording, video hosting, branded landing pages, in-video CTAs, AI script and personalization features, and (the differentiating capability) deep signal capture into Salesforce, HubSpot, Outreach, Salesloft, Gong, and the broader B2B revenue stack. Strengths: deepest CRM and revenue-tool integration in the category, mature reporting on per-prospect watch behavior, strong fit for outbound SDR and account-executive workflows, AI Avatar and AI personalization features shipped through 2024 and 2025, and a culture of incremental product velocity rather than feature churn. Best fit for B2B sales and revenue teams (50 to 5,000 employees) that anchor on Salesforce or HubSpot and run video at meaningful volume. Trade-offs: pricing is opaque above the SMB tier, the marketing-led brand-video story is thinner than Wistia, the consumer or creator experience is intentionally underbuilt (Vidyard does not want that buyer), and seat economics get expensive once large revenue teams roll out company-wide.

Best for

B2B sales and revenue teams (50 to 5,000 employees) running async sales video at volume, anchored on Salesforce or HubSpot, who care more about signal capture and CRM workflows than brand-video aesthetics.

Worst for

Marketing teams wanting deep brand video and gated landing pages (Wistia better), creator-led teams wanting modern editing UX (Tella better), or OTT and broadcast operators (Brightcove, Kaltura, JW Player better).

Strengths

  • Deepest CRM and revenue-tool integration in the category
  • Mature signal capture on per-prospect watch behavior
  • Strong fit for outbound SDR and AE workflows
  • AI Avatar and AI script personalization shipped through 2024 and 2025
  • Long history of focus on B2B sales, not creator or OTT
  • Reliable hosting with consistent player quality
  • Salesforce, HubSpot, Outreach, Salesloft native integrations

Weaknesses

  • Pricing opaque above the SMB Pro tier
  • Marketing-led brand video story thinner than Wistia
  • Seat economics expensive at company-wide rollout
  • AI features priced as add-ons at higher tiers
  • Limited fit for OTT, live streaming, or large media use cases
  • Player customization shallow vs Wistia or JW Player

Pricing tiers

partial
  • Vidyard Free
    Limited recordings, basic features, single user
    $0 /mo
  • Vidyard Pro
    Per user per month, unlimited recordings, basic integrations
    $19 /mo
  • Vidyard Plus
    Per user per month, AI features, advanced analytics, CRM integrations
    $59 /mo
  • Vidyard Business
    $15K to $80K per year typical, full team rollout, SSO, advanced security
    Quote
Watch for
  • · AI Avatar and AI personalization gated to higher tiers
  • · Seat economics scale at company-wide rollout
  • · SSO and advanced security on Business tier only
  • · Annual commit usually required for Business tier

Key features

  • +Screen and webcam recording (browser + desktop)
  • +Branded video landing pages and microsites
  • +In-video CTAs and forms
  • +AI Avatar and AI script personalization
  • +Per-prospect watch analytics
  • +Salesforce, HubSpot, Outreach, Salesloft native integrations
  • +Team folders, permissions, and SSO
  • +API for embedded video workflows
80+ integrations
SalesforceHubSpotOutreachSalesloftGongMarketoLinkedIn Sales Navigator
Geography
Global; strongest in US, Canada, UK, EU, ANZ
#2

Wistia

Bootstrapped Boston marketing-led video hosting that kept its strategy when nobody else did.

Founded 2006 · Cambridge, MA · private · 10-2,000 employees
G2 4.4 (1,180)
Capterra 4.6
From $0 /mo
● Transparent pricing
Visit Wistia

Wistia is the marketing-led brand video hosting reference in 2026. Founded 2006 in Cambridge (Massachusetts), Wistia famously took on debt in 2017 to buy back its early investors and run as an independent, bootstrapped, profitable company; that capital structure is now one of the most credible vendor-stability signals in the category. The product covers video hosting, customizable players, gated content with email capture, landing pages, channels (video hubs), webinars and events (Wistia Live), and (the most recent investment area) Wistia AI for chapters, summaries, and smart cuts launched in 2024. Strengths: cleanest marketing-led UX in the category, deeply customizable player, mature gated-content and lead-capture workflows, MAP integrations (HubSpot, Marketo, Pardot) that genuinely work, and a consistent strategy buyers can trust across multi-year horizons. Best fit for marketing teams (10 to 2,000 employees) anchored on gated content, branded landing pages, and lead capture into MAP. Trade-offs: pricing has crept upward over multiple cycles and is now meaningful for SMB buyers, bandwidth-based pricing creates surprise overages at scale, B2B sales-video signal capture is thinner than Vidyard, and the platform is intentionally not for OTT or live broadcast.

Best for

Marketing teams (10 to 2,000 employees) anchored on gated content, branded landing pages, and lead capture into HubSpot, Marketo, or Pardot.

Worst for

B2B sales teams running async prospecting at scale (Vidyard better), creator-led teams wanting modern editing (Tella better), OTT and broadcast operators (Brightcove, JW Player, Kaltura better).

Strengths

  • Cleanest marketing-led UX in the category
  • Deeply customizable player
  • Mature gated-content and lead-capture workflows
  • MAP integrations (HubSpot, Marketo, Pardot) that genuinely work
  • Bootstrapped capital structure signals long-term independence
  • Wistia AI features (chapters, summaries, smart cuts) shipped 2024
  • Consistent strategy across more than a decade

Weaknesses

  • Pricing has crept upward over multiple cycles
  • Bandwidth-based pricing creates surprise overages at scale
  • B2B sales-video signal capture thinner than Vidyard
  • Intentionally not built for OTT or live broadcast
  • Mid-market and enterprise rollouts can outgrow caps
  • Reviews flag price increases without proportional feature gains

Pricing tiers

public
  • Wistia Free
    Up to 10 videos, Wistia branding, limited features
    $0 /mo
  • Wistia Plus
    Up to 20 videos, basic customization, basic integrations
    $24 /mo
  • Wistia Pro
    Up to 100 videos, full customization, A/B testing, MAP integrations
    $99 /mo
  • Wistia Advanced
    Up to 250 videos, custom domains, advanced security, dedicated support
    $399 /mo
  • Wistia Premium
    Enterprise, custom contract, $15K to $50K+ per year typical
    Quote
Watch for
  • · Bandwidth overages above included tier
  • · Additional video slots priced per video
  • · Custom domain and white-label gated to Advanced and above
  • · Premium tier annual commit usually required

Key features

  • +Branded video hosting and customizable player
  • +Channels (video hubs and content libraries)
  • +Wistia Live (webinars and events)
  • +Wistia AI (chapters, summaries, smart cuts)
  • +Gated content with email capture
  • +A/B testing of videos and CTAs
  • +HubSpot, Marketo, Pardot, Salesforce integrations
  • +API and embeddable players
95+ integrations
HubSpotMarketoPardotSalesforceMailchimpWordPressDrift
Geography
Global; strongest in US, Canada, UK, EU, ANZ
#3

Loom

Async video messaging leader, acquired by Atlassian October 2023 for $975M.

Founded 2015 · San Francisco, CA · public · 50-50,000 employees
G2 4.6 (2,080)
Capterra 4.7
From $0 /mo
● Transparent pricing
Visit Loom

Loom is the async video messaging category leader, founded 2015 in San Francisco, acquired by Atlassian in October 2023 for $975M. The product covers screen and webcam recording, instant share links, transcripts, comments, viewer signal, and (post-acquisition) integration into the Atlassian Cloud surface alongside Jira, Confluence, and Trello. Strengths: defined the category for one-click async video sharing, fastest record-to-share UX in the market, viewer signal (views, watch percentage, reactions) flows back into Slack and Atlassian tools, broad bottom-up adoption inside engineering and product teams, and Atlassian-parent stability eliminates startup-stage vendor risk. Best fit for Atlassian-anchored organizations (50 to 50,000 employees) where async video messaging is part of how engineering, product, and customer-success teams already work. Trade-offs: the Atlassian acquisition is positive for stability and negative for buyers who picked Loom precisely because it was not part of a big collaboration suite; pricing has been adjusted post-acquisition; the standalone Loom roadmap has been visibly slowed in favor of Atlassian Cloud integration; non-Atlassian shops should weigh whether buying Loom now is effectively a vote for Atlassian as a strategic vendor; and the B2B sales signal capture is thinner than Vidyard.

Best for

Atlassian-anchored organizations (50 to 50,000 employees) where async video messaging is integrated into Jira, Confluence, and engineering and product workflows.

Worst for

B2B sales teams running outbound async video at scale (Vidyard better), marketing teams running gated brand video (Wistia better), or shops actively trying to avoid Atlassian as a strategic vendor.

Strengths

  • Defined the category for one-click async video sharing
  • Fastest record-to-share UX in the market
  • Atlassian-parent stability eliminates startup-stage vendor risk
  • Viewer signal integrates cleanly with Slack and Atlassian tools
  • Broad bottom-up adoption in engineering and product teams
  • Transcripts, comments, and reactions are mature
  • Native integration into Jira, Confluence, Trello post-acquisition

Weaknesses

  • Atlassian acquisition is mixed signal for non-Atlassian shops
  • Standalone Loom roadmap visibly slowed in favor of Atlassian Cloud integration
  • Post-acquisition pricing adjustments flagged by reviewers
  • B2B sales signal capture thinner than Vidyard
  • Marketing-led brand video story below Wistia
  • AI feature pace mixed signal post-acquisition

Pricing tiers

public
  • Loom Starter
    Up to 25 videos per person, 5 minutes per video
    $0 /mo
  • Loom Business
    Per creator per month, unlimited videos and recording time, advanced editing
    $15 /mo
  • Loom Business + AI
    Per creator per month, includes Loom AI features
    $20 /mo
  • Loom Enterprise
    $15K to $200K+ per year typical, SSO, advanced security, Atlassian bundle pricing available
    Quote
Watch for
  • · Loom AI gated to Business + AI tier and above
  • · Atlassian bundle pricing complexity at Enterprise tier
  • · Seat economics scale at company-wide rollout
  • · Annual commit usually required for Enterprise

Key features

  • +Browser and desktop screen + webcam recording
  • +Instant share links and embed
  • +Transcripts and AI summaries (Loom AI)
  • +Comments, reactions, and emoji on video timeline
  • +Viewer signal and analytics
  • +Jira, Confluence, Slack, GitHub integrations
  • +SSO and team admin controls (Enterprise)
  • +API and Atlassian Cloud integration
60+ integrations
JiraConfluenceSlackGitHubNotionSalesforceHubSpot
Geography
Global; strongest in US, UK, EU, ANZ, India
#6

Brightcove

NASDAQ-listed enterprise OTT veteran with muted growth and a flat stock chart.

Founded 2004 · Boston, MA · public · 500-50,000+ employees
G2 4.2 (480)
Capterra 4.4
Custom quote
○ Sales call required
Visit Brightcove

Brightcove (NASDAQ:BCOV) is one of the original enterprise video platforms, founded 2004 in Boston (Massachusetts) and publicly traded since 2012. The company covers enterprise OTT (Brightcove Beacon, Live, Player), broadcast workflows, internal communications video, and enterprise marketing video, with a long history in media and broadcaster deployments. Strengths: 20+ year track record, mature enterprise OTT and live-streaming stack, deep player customization and DRM support, multi-CDN delivery and high reliability, strong fit for broadcasters, publishers, and large enterprises, and public-company financial transparency. Best fit for media, broadcast, and large enterprises (500 to 50,000+ employees) running OTT, live streaming, or large-scale internal communications video. Trade-offs: revenue growth has been muted for multiple years, stock chart is flat relative to higher-growth SaaS peers, B2B sales-video and marketing-led primitives are below Vidyard and Wistia, pricing is fully opaque (call-for-quote at every tier), implementation and services investment is meaningful (months not weeks), and the AI feature pace lags Vidyard and Wistia.

Best for

Media, broadcast, and large enterprises (500 to 50,000+ employees) running OTT, live streaming, or large-scale internal communications video where reliability, monetization, and DRM matter more than modern marketing UX.

Worst for

B2B sales teams running async prospecting (Vidyard better), marketing teams running gated brand video (Wistia better), SMB and mid-market buyers (Wistia, Vidyard better, far less opaque pricing).

Strengths

  • 20+ year track record in enterprise video
  • Mature enterprise OTT and live-streaming stack
  • Deep player customization and DRM support
  • Multi-CDN delivery and high reliability
  • Strong fit for broadcasters, publishers, and large enterprises
  • Public-company financial transparency (NASDAQ:BCOV)
  • Mature monetization tools (ads, subscriptions, pay-per-view)

Weaknesses

  • Revenue growth muted for multiple years
  • Stock chart flat relative to higher-growth SaaS peers
  • B2B sales-video primitives below Vidyard
  • Marketing-led primitives below Wistia
  • Pricing fully opaque (call-for-quote at every tier)
  • Implementation and services investment meaningful
  • AI feature pace lags Vidyard, Wistia

Pricing tiers

opaque
  • Brightcove Marketing
    ~$10K to $40K per year typical for marketing-led video
    Quote
  • Brightcove Enterprise Video
    ~$40K to $150K per year for enterprise internal communications
    Quote
  • Brightcove Beacon (OTT)
    ~$150K to $1M+ per year for OTT and broadcast
    Quote
  • Brightcove Live
    Custom pricing for live-streaming use cases
    Quote
Watch for
  • · Implementation services (months, not weeks)
  • · Bandwidth and CDN costs at scale
  • · DRM and ad-server modules
  • · AI features priced as add-ons
  • · Annual price increases of 5 to 10 percent reported

Key features

  • +Enterprise video hosting and player
  • +OTT (Brightcove Beacon) for broadcasters and publishers
  • +Live streaming (Brightcove Live)
  • +DRM and content protection
  • +Monetization (ads, subscriptions, pay-per-view)
  • +Multi-CDN delivery
  • +Analytics and viewership reports
  • +API and developer tooling
75+ integrations
Salesforce Marketing CloudMarketoHubSpotGoogle Ad ManagerAdobe Experience ManagerMicrosoft 365SharePoint
Geography
Global; strongest in US, UK, EU, APAC, LATAM
#7

Kaltura

NASDAQ-listed enterprise and higher-education video, stock down roughly 85 percent from peak.

Founded 2006 · New York, NY · public · 1,000-100,000+ employees
G2 4.2 (520)
Capterra 4.3
Custom quote
○ Sales call required
Visit Kaltura

Kaltura (NASDAQ:KLTR) is a long-running enterprise and higher-education video platform, founded 2006 with a strong original open-source heritage. The company IPO'd on NASDAQ in July 2021 near the peak of the SaaS bubble at $10/share and has since declined to roughly $1.50 to $2 per share, approximately an 85 percent drawdown from peak. The product covers enterprise video portals, higher-education lecture capture (Kaltura Video Cloud for Education), virtual events, internal communications video, and OTT video for media. Strengths: deep higher-education footprint (used at hundreds of universities for lecture capture and LMS integration with Canvas, Blackboard, Moodle), broad enterprise video portal capabilities, mature accessibility (closed captioning, transcripts, WCAG compliance), multi-language and multi-region delivery, and open-source heritage that creates flexibility for customization. Best fit for higher-education institutions and large enterprises (1,000 to 100,000+ employees / students) running internal video portals, lecture capture, or LMS-integrated video. Trade-offs: post-IPO stock decline (~85 percent from peak) creates legitimate vendor-stability questions, ARR growth muted, UX dated relative to Vidyard and Wistia, pricing fully opaque, implementation is complex (months not weeks), and the B2B sales-video and marketing-led primitives are well below Vidyard / Wistia.

Best for

Higher-education institutions and large enterprises (1,000 to 100,000+ employees or students) running internal video portals, lecture capture, LMS-integrated video, or large-scale accessible internal communications.

Worst for

B2B sales and marketing teams (Vidyard, Wistia better), SMB and mid-market (Wistia better, far less opaque pricing), or buyers worried about public-company financial trajectory.

Strengths

  • Deep higher-education footprint with LMS integrations (Canvas, Blackboard, Moodle)
  • Broad enterprise video portal capabilities
  • Mature accessibility (closed captioning, transcripts, WCAG)
  • Multi-language and multi-region delivery
  • Open-source heritage and customization flexibility
  • Mature lecture-capture workflow
  • 20+ year track record

Weaknesses

  • Post-IPO stock decline (~85 percent from peak) creates vendor-stability questions
  • ARR growth muted post-IPO
  • UX dated relative to Vidyard and Wistia
  • Pricing fully opaque (call-for-quote at every tier)
  • Implementation complex (months, not weeks)
  • B2B sales-video and marketing-led primitives well below Vidyard and Wistia
  • Management churn since IPO

Pricing tiers

opaque
  • Kaltura Video Cloud for Enterprise
    ~$30K to $150K per year typical for enterprise portal
    Quote
  • Kaltura Video Cloud for Education
    Higher-education priced per student or per FTE, ~$20K to $300K per year
    Quote
  • Kaltura Virtual Events
    ~$40K to $200K per year
    Quote
  • Kaltura OTT
    Custom pricing for media and broadcasters, often $250K+ per year
    Quote
Watch for
  • · Implementation services (months, not weeks)
  • · Bandwidth and storage costs at scale
  • · Higher-education FTE band scaling
  • · AI features priced as add-ons
  • · Annual price increases reported

Key features

  • +Enterprise video portal
  • +Lecture capture (higher education)
  • +LMS integrations (Canvas, Blackboard, Moodle, D2L)
  • +Live streaming and webinars
  • +Closed captioning, transcripts, accessibility
  • +Multi-language and multi-region delivery
  • +OTT video for media
  • +API and open-source extensions
110+ integrations
CanvasBlackboardMoodleD2L BrightspaceMicrosoft TeamsZoomSalesforce
Geography
Global; strongest in US, EU, ANZ, Middle East
#8

Vimeo Business

Post-SPAC public Vimeo, post-Anjali-Sud departure, pivoting back to enterprise with revenue deceleration.

Founded 2004 · New York, NY · public · 10-10,000 employees
G2 4.3 (1,820)
Capterra 4.5
From $0 /mo
● Transparent pricing
Visit Vimeo Business

Vimeo Business is the B2B-tier offering from Vimeo (NASDAQ:VMEO), the long-running video platform founded 2004 in New York. Vimeo went public via SPAC merger in May 2021 at peak SaaS valuations and has since experienced material revenue deceleration. Founder-CEO Anjali Sud departed in August 2023 after years of trying to reposition Vimeo as a creator-to-enterprise platform. The company is now pivoting back toward enterprise under new leadership. The product covers video hosting, branded landing pages, OTT (Vimeo OTT), live streaming (Vimeo Live), team collaboration, and (more recently) enterprise video workflows. Strengths: enormous brand recognition (Vimeo is one of the most-known consumer video brands in the world), broad SMB and mid-market footprint, strong creative-tool integration (Premiere, After Effects, Final Cut Pro), Vimeo Live for live streaming, OTT module for media, and a public-company financial transparency layer. Best fit for SMB and mid-market organizations (10 to 1,000 employees) wanting a broad, branded video platform with creative-tool integration. Trade-offs: post-Anjali-Sud leadership turnover and revenue deceleration are real vendor-trust concerns, post-SPAC stock decline is meaningful, the strategy has shifted multiple times (creator to enterprise to creator to enterprise again), B2B sales-video signal capture is below Vidyard, B2B marketing-led primitives are below Wistia, and pricing tier complexity has been flagged by reviewers.

Best for

SMB and mid-market organizations (10 to 1,000 employees) wanting a broadly recognized, branded video platform with strong creative-tool integration and the option to scale to live streaming or OTT.

Worst for

B2B sales teams running async prospecting (Vidyard better), B2B marketers running gated content (Wistia better, more consistent strategy), or large enterprises and broadcasters needing deep OTT (Brightcove, JW Player better).

Strengths

  • Enormous brand recognition (one of the most-known consumer video brands)
  • Broad SMB and mid-market footprint
  • Strong creative-tool integration (Premiere, After Effects, Final Cut Pro)
  • Vimeo Live for live streaming
  • Vimeo OTT for media subscriptions
  • Public-company financial transparency (NASDAQ:VMEO)
  • AI features shipped 2024 and 2025

Weaknesses

  • Post-Anjali-Sud leadership turnover (CEO departed August 2023)
  • Revenue deceleration post-SPAC
  • Stock decline material from SPAC peak
  • Strategy has shifted multiple times (creator to enterprise to creator to enterprise)
  • B2B sales-video signal capture below Vidyard
  • B2B marketing-led primitives below Wistia
  • Pricing tier complexity flagged by reviewers

Pricing tiers

public
  • Vimeo Free
    Limited storage, Vimeo branding
    $0 /mo
  • Vimeo Starter
    Per user per month, basic features
    $12 /mo
  • Vimeo Standard
    Per user per month, more storage, basic team features
    $20 /mo
  • Vimeo Advanced
    Per user per month, full team features, advanced analytics, basic OTT
    $65 /mo
  • Vimeo Enterprise
    Custom pricing, $15K to $150K+ per year typical
    Quote
Watch for
  • · Storage and bandwidth overages at higher volumes
  • · OTT and live streaming priced as add-ons or higher tiers
  • · AI features gated to higher tiers
  • · Annual commit required for advertised pricing
  • · Enterprise sales pricing complexity

Key features

  • +Branded video hosting and player
  • +Vimeo Live (live streaming)
  • +Vimeo OTT (subscription video for media)
  • +Team collaboration and review tools
  • +Creative-tool integration (Premiere, After Effects, Final Cut Pro)
  • +Vimeo AI features (chapters, summaries)
  • +Branded landing pages and showcases
  • +API and embeddable players
70+ integrations
HubSpotSalesforceMarketoMailchimpAdobe Premiere ProFinal Cut ProYouTube
Geography
Global; strongest in US, UK, EU, ANZ, LATAM
#10

JW Player

OTT and live-streaming infrastructure veteran with $100M Series C in 2019.

Founded 2008 · New York, NY · private · 50-50,000+ employees
G2 4.2 (380)
Capterra 4.5
Custom quote
○ Sales call required
Visit JW Player

JW Player is one of the original video infrastructure companies, founded 2008 in New York (Jeroen Wijering, JW). The original JW Player open-source HTML5 video player became one of the most-deployed players on the open web. The company has since built out JW Live (live streaming), JW Studio (video CMS and workflow), and a broader OTT and publisher-focused platform. JW Player raised a $100M Series C in 2019 led by LLR Partners and remains private, focused primarily on OTT and publisher use cases rather than B2B marketing or sales video. Strengths: deep OTT and publisher heritage, most-deployed open-web video player historically, JW Live for live streaming, JW Studio for video CMS workflows, mature monetization (ads, subscriptions, pay-per-view), strong fit for broadcasters and publishers, and recurring well-funded private-company stability. Best fit for publishers, broadcasters, OTT operators, and large media companies (50 to 50,000+ employees) running ad-supported or subscription video where player customization and monetization matter. Trade-offs: not built for B2B sales or marketing video (Vidyard, Wistia better), pricing fully opaque, implementation services investment meaningful, B2B brand recognition has faded as the open-web player era ended, and product velocity in 2024 and 2025 has been measured rather than aggressive.

Best for

Publishers, broadcasters, OTT operators, and large media companies (50 to 50,000+ employees) running ad-supported or subscription video where player customization, monetization, and OTT delivery matter.

Worst for

B2B sales teams (Vidyard better), B2B marketing teams running gated brand video (Wistia better), or SMB and mid-market buyers who want modern, transparent pricing.

Strengths

  • Deep OTT and publisher heritage
  • Most-deployed open-web HTML5 video player historically
  • JW Live for live streaming
  • JW Studio for video CMS workflows
  • Mature monetization (ads, subscriptions, pay-per-view)
  • Strong fit for broadcasters and publishers
  • Well-funded private-company stability

Weaknesses

  • Not built for B2B sales or marketing video
  • Pricing fully opaque (call-for-quote everywhere)
  • Implementation services investment meaningful
  • B2B brand recognition has faded post open-web era
  • Product velocity measured rather than aggressive
  • UX dated relative to modern marketing video tools

Pricing tiers

opaque
  • JW Player Starter
    ~$10K to $30K per year typical for smaller publishers
    Quote
  • JW Player Business
    ~$30K to $120K per year for mid-market publishers and broadcasters
    Quote
  • JW Player Enterprise
    ~$120K to $500K+ per year for large media and OTT
    Quote
Watch for
  • · Bandwidth and CDN costs at scale
  • · Ad-server and DRM modules
  • · Implementation services
  • · Annual price increases reported

Key features

  • +HTML5 video player
  • +JW Live (live streaming)
  • +JW Studio (video CMS)
  • +Ad-server integration (SSAI, CSAI)
  • +DRM and content protection
  • +OTT module for media subscriptions
  • +Multi-CDN delivery
  • +API and developer tooling
60+ integrations
Google Ad ManagerSpringServeMagniteWordPressAkamaiAWS CloudFrontSalesforce Marketing Cloud
Geography
Global; strongest in US, UK, EU, APAC, LATAM
#5

Sendspark

Modern Y Combinator video prospecting platform with AI personalization at moderate volume.

Founded 2019 · Miami, FL · private · 5-500 employees
G2 4.7 (320)
Capterra 4.7
From $0 /mo
● Transparent pricing
Visit Sendspark

Sendspark is the modern challenger in the B2B video prospecting category, founded 2019 in Miami (Florida) and an alum of Y Combinator (W21 batch). The product covers screen and webcam recording, branded landing pages, AI personalization (dynamic backgrounds, AI-generated intros, name-stitching), and integrations with HubSpot, Salesforce, Outreach, Salesloft, and the SDR stack. Strengths: modern UX targeted explicitly at outbound SDRs, AI personalization features that turn one base video into many personalized variants, fast product velocity, founder-led culture, price-positioned below Vidyard for similar use cases, and integrations with the SDR-native stack. Best fit for outbound SDR teams (5 to 500 employees) running personalized video at moderate to high volume who want a modern AI-anchored alternative to Vidyard. Trade-offs: smaller deployed base than Vidyard or Loom, CRM signal capture decent but not as deep as Vidyard, enterprise security and compliance posture less mature than Vidyard or Wistia, feature breadth narrower than Vidyard by design, and brand recognition still building outside SDR communities.

Best for

Outbound SDR teams (5 to 500 employees) running AI-personalized video prospecting at moderate to high volume, anchored on HubSpot, Salesforce, Outreach, or Salesloft.

Worst for

Enterprise rollouts with thousands of reps (Vidyard better), marketing-led brand hosting (Wistia better), or regulated industries needing the deepest compliance posture (Vidyard, Wistia better).

Strengths

  • Modern UX targeted at outbound SDRs
  • AI personalization (dynamic backgrounds, AI intros, name-stitching)
  • Fast product velocity, founder-led culture
  • Price-positioned below Vidyard for similar use cases
  • Native integrations with HubSpot, Salesforce, Outreach, Salesloft
  • Modern API and developer experience
  • Strong fit for AI-personalized outbound at scale

Weaknesses

  • Smaller deployed base than Vidyard or Loom
  • CRM signal capture decent but less deep than Vidyard
  • Enterprise security and compliance posture less mature
  • Feature breadth narrower than Vidyard
  • Brand recognition still building outside SDR communities
  • Support depth thinner than larger vendors

Pricing tiers

public
  • Sendspark Free
    Limited videos, basic features
    $0 /mo
  • Sendspark Starter
    Per user per month, unlimited videos, basic AI features
    $15 /mo
  • Sendspark Teams
    Per user per month, advanced AI personalization, CRM integrations
    $49 /mo
  • Sendspark Enterprise
    $10K to $80K per year typical, SSO, advanced security, full team rollout
    Quote
Watch for
  • · AI personalization credits consumed at scale
  • · Advanced CRM integrations gated to Teams and above
  • · SSO and advanced security on Enterprise tier only
  • · Annual commit usually required for Enterprise

Key features

  • +Screen and webcam recording
  • +AI personalization (dynamic backgrounds, name-stitching)
  • +Branded landing pages and microsites
  • +CRM signal capture and analytics
  • +HubSpot, Salesforce, Outreach, Salesloft native integrations
  • +Team dashboards and SDR reporting
  • +API and webhooks
  • +Bulk personalized video campaigns
40+ integrations
HubSpotSalesforceOutreachSalesloftApolloLinkedIn Sales NavigatorSlack
Geography
Global; strongest in US, Canada, UK, EU
#9

Tella

Modern design-led async video tool for creators, designers, and small B2B teams.

Founded 2020 · London, UK · private · 5-200 employees
G2 4.7 (280)
Capterra 4.6
From $0 /mo
● Transparent pricing
Visit Tella

Tella is the modern design-led entrant in the async video category, founded 2020 in London (UK). The product is positioned at the intersection of Loom and a lightweight video editor: screen and webcam recording with built-in modern layouts, backgrounds, zoom-and-pan effects, automatic cuts of silence and filler words, branded share pages, and integrations with Notion, Slack, and modern productivity tools. Strengths: most polished, design-led UX in the async video category, modern editing features (layouts, backgrounds, zoom effects, silence removal) that turn raw recordings into share-ready content, founder-led culture with consistent product direction, fast product velocity, price-positioned competitively against Loom and Sendspark, and modern integrations with Notion, Slack, and creator tooling. Best fit for creator-anchored teams, design-heavy marketing teams, small B2B teams (5 to 200 employees), and individuals who want polished async video without enterprise complexity. Trade-offs: smaller deployed base than Loom or Vidyard, B2B sales-video signal capture into Salesforce or HubSpot is thinner than Vidyard or Sendspark, enterprise security and compliance posture is less mature than larger vendors, integrations footprint narrower than Vidyard or Loom, and brand recognition is still building outside design and creator communities.

Best for

Creator-anchored teams, design-heavy marketing teams, and small B2B teams (5 to 200 employees) wanting polished async video with modern editing built in.

Worst for

B2B sales teams running async prospecting at scale (Vidyard, Sendspark better), enterprises needing deep security and compliance (Vidyard, Wistia, Loom better), or OTT and broadcast operators.

Strengths

  • Most polished, design-led UX in the async video category
  • Modern editing features (layouts, backgrounds, zoom, silence removal)
  • Founder-led culture with consistent product direction
  • Fast product velocity
  • Price-positioned competitively vs Loom and Sendspark
  • Modern integrations with Notion, Slack, and creator tooling
  • Strong fit for design-heavy marketing teams

Weaknesses

  • Smaller deployed base than Loom or Vidyard
  • B2B sales-video signal capture thinner than Vidyard or Sendspark
  • Enterprise security and compliance posture less mature
  • Integrations footprint narrower
  • Brand recognition still building outside creator and design communities
  • Not built for OTT, live streaming, or large enterprise rollout

Pricing tiers

public
  • Tella Free
    Limited videos, basic features
    $0 /mo
  • Tella Pro
    Per user per month, unlimited videos, advanced editing features
    $19 /mo
  • Tella Teams
    Per user per month, team workspaces, brand kits, advanced analytics
    $49 /mo
  • Tella Enterprise
    Custom pricing for larger teams, SSO, advanced security
    Quote
Watch for
  • · Brand kits and advanced analytics gated to Teams and above
  • · SSO on Enterprise tier only
  • · Seat economics scale with team size
  • · Annual commit usually required for Enterprise

Key features

  • +Screen and webcam recording with modern layouts
  • +Built-in editing (layouts, backgrounds, zoom, silence removal)
  • +Branded share pages and embed
  • +AI summaries and chapters
  • +Team workspaces and brand kits
  • +Notion, Slack, Figma, modern productivity integrations
  • +API and webhooks
  • +Mobile recording support
35+ integrations
NotionSlackFigmaHubSpotSalesforceMicrosoft 365Zapier
Geography
Global; strongest in UK, US, EU
#4

Bonjoro

Australian specialist for personalized one-to-one sales and onboarding video at SMB volume.

Founded 2017 · Sydney, NSW, Australia · private · 5-500 employees
G2 4.7 (480)
Capterra 4.7
From $0 /mo
● Transparent pricing
Visit Bonjoro

Bonjoro is the personalized one-to-one sales video specialist, founded 2017 in Sydney (Australia). The product is narrower than Vidyard or Loom by design, it is built specifically for sales, customer success, and onboarding teams that ship volume of short personalized videos with a CTA to a customer or prospect. Strengths: deepest workflow for personalized one-to-one video (send via CRM trigger, follow up on the same thread, see watch signal in CRM), strong SMB and mid-market fit, founder-led culture with consistent product direction since 2017, integrations with HubSpot, Salesforce, ActiveCampaign, Klaviyo, and the rest of the SMB revenue stack, and price-positioned below Vidyard for similar use cases. Best fit for SMB and mid-market sales, customer success, and onboarding teams (5 to 500 employees) that ship 50 to 500 personalized videos per rep per month. Trade-offs: feature breadth narrower than Vidyard (Bonjoro chose this on purpose), B2B sales-signal capture into Salesforce is decent but not as deep as Vidyard, enterprise rollout coverage thinner than Vidyard or Loom, brand recognition outside ANZ and SMB e-commerce circles is limited, and the platform is intentionally not for hosting or marketing-led brand video.

Best for

SMB and mid-market sales, customer success, and onboarding teams (5 to 500 employees) shipping 50 to 500 personalized videos per rep per month, anchored on HubSpot, Salesforce, ActiveCampaign, or Klaviyo.

Worst for

Enterprise rollouts with thousands of reps (Vidyard / Loom better), marketing-led brand video and gated landing pages (Wistia better), or OTT and broadcast (Brightcove, Kaltura, JW Player).

Strengths

  • Deepest workflow for personalized one-to-one sales video
  • Strong SMB and mid-market fit
  • Founder-led culture with consistent product direction
  • Native integrations with HubSpot, Salesforce, ActiveCampaign, Klaviyo
  • Price-positioned below Vidyard for similar use cases
  • Mobile app for record-on-the-go workflows
  • Real-time watch notifications to reps

Weaknesses

  • Feature breadth narrower than Vidyard by design
  • Enterprise rollout coverage thinner than Vidyard or Loom
  • Brand recognition outside ANZ and SMB e-commerce circles limited
  • CRM signal capture decent but not as deep as Vidyard
  • Not built for marketing-led hosting or gated content
  • Player customization shallow vs Wistia

Pricing tiers

public
  • Bonjoro Free
    Up to 5 users, basic features, light branding
    $0 /mo
  • Bonjoro Connect
    Per user per month, integrations, branded sender pages
    $19 /mo
  • Bonjoro Talent
    Per user per month, advanced campaigns, deeper CRM integration
    $39 /mo
  • Bonjoro Marketer
    Per user per month, automations, analytics, full feature set
    $79 /mo
Watch for
  • · Annual billing for advertised pricing
  • · Higher-tier campaign automations gated
  • · CRM integrations gated above Free tier
  • · Seat economics scale with sales team

Key features

  • +One-to-one personalized video recording (mobile + browser)
  • +CRM trigger workflows (HubSpot, Salesforce, ActiveCampaign, Klaviyo)
  • +Watch notifications in real time to reps
  • +Branded landing pages and CTAs
  • +Campaign automation for onboarding sequences
  • +Team dashboards and performance reports
  • +Video templates and prompts for reps
  • +API and webhooks
50+ integrations
HubSpotSalesforceActiveCampaignKlaviyoShopifyMailchimpZapier
Geography
Global; strongest in ANZ, US, UK, EU

Frequently asked questions

The questions buyers actually ask before they sign.

Vidyard vs Loom for a US B2B sales team in 2026?
Vidyard for serious B2B sales teams anchored on Salesforce, HubSpot, Outreach, or Salesloft. The CRM signal capture is a different league: per-prospect watch data flows into the right opportunity records, AEs trust the data, SDRs build cadences around it. Loom is the right call only inside Atlassian-anchored orgs (Jira, Confluence, Bitbucket native) where the value of one integrated collaboration suite outweighs the value of best-in-class sales-video signal. Loom never built the CRM signal-capture depth Vidyard has, and post-acquisition Atlassian is unlikely to prioritize building it because the strategic direction of Loom inside Atlassian is collaboration, not revenue tooling. For a US B2B sales team that does not run Atlassian, Vidyard is the clearer pick.
Is Wistia still the right US marketing-video pick if Vimeo Business is cheaper?
Yes for marketing teams that care about gated content, branded landing pages, deep player customization, and MAP integrations that actually work (HubSpot, Marketo, Pardot). Wistia is bootstrapped, profitable, and has held its strategy across more than a decade; that capital structure is a real procurement asset versus Vimeo (NASDAQ:VMEO, post-SPAC, post-Anjali-Sud, revenue decelerating, pivoting back to enterprise). Vimeo Business is cheaper on list price and adequate for teams that need clean hosting plus reliable players without sophisticated lead capture. The honest framing: Wistia for marketing teams that treat video as a revenue channel and need MAP-grade workflows; Vimeo Business for teams that need a reliable hosting tier and have no specific gated-content requirement.
When should a US buyer pick Brightcove vs Kaltura vs JW Player for OTT?
Brightcove for US broadcast and media customers (live streaming, broadcast workflows, monetization). Kaltura for US higher-ed and large-enterprise video portals (the university and Fortune-500 internal-video story is Kaltura's strongest). JW Player for US publishers and OTT operators who want player-first infrastructure with monetization built in (JW Live plus JW Studio). All three are mature; all three publish nothing meaningful on pricing and require sales contact. Brightcove and Kaltura are NASDAQ-listed with documented multi-year revenue trajectories you can underwrite at procurement; JW Player is private with a 2019 $100M Series C and less public financial signal. None of the three is a fit for B2B sales video or marketing-led brand hosting; those buyers should pick Vidyard, Wistia, Vimeo Business, or Loom.
How does the Loom-Atlassian acquisition affect a US procurement decision in 2026?
Materially. Loom is now part of Atlassian Cloud; standalone Loom procurement still exists but the strategic direction is integration into Jira, Confluence, and Bitbucket. For US Atlassian-anchored orgs this is a clear positive: one vendor, one identity layer, one contract, deeper workflow integration. For US orgs that picked Loom precisely because it was an independent async-video pure-play with no collaboration-suite ties, this is a real change of vendor relationship. Atlassian has a strong track record on post-acquisition product stability (Trello, Statuspage, Opsgenie) but a more mixed track record on roadmap velocity for acquired products as a standalone surface. US buyers in 2026 should treat Loom as an Atlassian product, evaluate it on those terms, and consider Vidyard, Sendspark, or Tella if independence and async-video-first focus is a hard requirement.
Vidyard vs Loom vs Wistia, which one for my use case?
Vidyard if you are a B2B sales or revenue team running async prospecting and account-based motion anchored on Salesforce or HubSpot; the CRM signal capture and revenue-tool integrations are in a different league. Loom if you are an Atlassian-anchored organization where async video messaging is part of engineering and product workflows; the Atlassian acquisition is positive for stability, mixed for buyers who picked Loom precisely because it was independent. Wistia if you are a marketing team running gated content, branded landing pages, and lead capture into HubSpot, Marketo, or Pardot; Wistia stayed bootstrapped and consistent, which is one of the strongest vendor-trust signals in the category. Most organizations end up running two of the three in parallel: one for sales (Vidyard), one for marketing hosting (Wistia), one for internal async messaging (Loom).
What actually happened with the Loom Atlassian acquisition?
Atlassian acquired Loom in October 2023 for $975M. The product still works and continues to ship features. Through 2024 and 2025, Loom has been integrated into Atlassian Cloud alongside Jira and Confluence, native embeds and viewing experiences have shipped, and pricing tiers have been adjusted (Loom AI features moved to a dedicated AI tier in 2025, which reviewers flagged as a downgrade for users on prior plans). Some Loom team departures have been reported post-acquisition, consistent with normal acquisition-integration patterns. The honest summary: Loom is now an Atlassian Cloud product. For Atlassian-anchored organizations this is positive, the integration is real and the parent is stable. For non-Atlassian organizations this is mixed signal, buyers should weigh whether adopting Loom in 2026 is effectively a vote for Atlassian as a strategic vendor.
Is Vimeo in trouble?
Vimeo (NASDAQ:VMEO) is publicly traded and not in immediate financial distress, but the trajectory has been visibly difficult. Vimeo went public via SPAC merger in May 2021 at peak SaaS valuations, the stock has since declined materially, revenue has decelerated, and founder-CEO Anjali Sud departed in August 2023 after roughly seven years leading the company. New CEO Philip Moyer joined from Google Cloud in 2024 and is reinforcing an enterprise pivot. The product itself still works and the brand remains one of the most recognized in consumer and SMB video. Buyers should consider that Vimeo strategy has shifted multiple times (creator-first to enterprise to creator-first to enterprise again) and that the 2024 to 2026 enterprise pivot is still in execution. For multi-year contracts, negotiate exit clauses tied to vendor-stability scenarios.
How bad is the Kaltura stock decline?
Kaltura (NASDAQ:KLTR) IPO'd on NASDAQ in July 2021 at $10/share, and the stock has since declined to roughly $1.50 to $2 per share, approximately an 85 percent drawdown from peak. ARR growth has been muted post-IPO, the company has gone through multiple workforce reductions, and management has emphasized profitability over growth. The product itself remains a leading enterprise and higher-education video platform, the Canvas, Blackboard, Moodle, and D2L integrations are mature, and accessibility (closed captioning, WCAG) is genuinely strong. Higher-education buyers signing multi-year Kaltura contracts in 2026 should do procurement-side diligence on vendor financial stability and negotiate exit clauses. The product working well today does not mean the company will be at the same scale in five years.
Should I use my video conferencing platform for video marketing, or a dedicated platform?
Most organizations end up running both. The video conferencing platform (Zoom, Teams, Google Meet) handles internal video calls and basic recorded webinars. The dedicated video marketing platform (Vidyard, Wistia, Loom, Vimeo Business) handles async sales prospecting, gated content video, branded landing pages, OTT, or live streaming. The mistake is using the conferencing platform for marketing-led video and then wondering why the brand looks generic and the analytics are shallow. The mistake in the other direction is paying for a marketing video platform when your use case is actually internal video calls. Decide by job-to-be-done first.
How much should I budget for video marketing and hosting software?
SMB (5 to 50 employees): $1.2K to $3K per year (Wistia Plus or Pro, Vimeo Standard, Loom Business 5 to 10 seats, Bonjoro Connect, Tella Pro). Mid-market (50 to 500 employees): $5K to $25K per year (Wistia Pro or Advanced, Vidyard Plus, Loom Business, Sendspark Teams). Mid-market+ (200 to 2,000 employees): $20K to $80K per year (Vidyard Business, Wistia Advanced, Loom Enterprise, Vimeo Enterprise). Enterprise (2,000 to 50,000+ employees): $80K to $500K+ per year (Brightcove Beacon, Kaltura enterprise, JW Player enterprise, Vidyard Business enterprise tiers). For enterprise OTT and broadcast (Brightcove, Kaltura, JW Player) pricing is opaque and verified buyer disclosures are critical, expect six-figure annual deals.
What about AI features in video marketing software in 2026?
AI in video marketing 2026: (1) AI transcripts and summaries (table stakes, every major vendor offers this), (2) AI chapters and smart cuts (Wistia AI, Loom AI, Tella, Sendspark), (3) AI personalization for outbound video (Vidyard AI Avatar, Sendspark dynamic backgrounds and name-stitching lead the category here), (4) AI content repurposing (turn one webinar or video into many assets, more common in webinar tools like Goldcast than in pure video hosting, though Wistia AI is closing the gap), (5) AI search and content discovery (Kaltura, Brightcove for enterprise portal search). The pattern is that AI transcripts and summaries are commoditizing, AI personalization for outbound and AI editing for creators (silence removal, layouts, zoom) are the real differentiators, and AI features are increasingly gated to higher pricing tiers.
Can I trial these platforms before committing?
Free trials and free tiers: Vidyard (free tier plus 14-day Pro and Plus trial), Wistia (Free Forever tier plus 14-day Plus and Pro trial), Loom (Starter free tier plus 14-day Business and Business + AI trial), Bonjoro (free tier plus 14-day Connect, Talent, Marketer trial), Sendspark (free tier plus 14-day Starter and Teams trial), Vimeo (30-day money-back guarantee), Tella (free tier plus 14-day Pro and Teams trial). Demo only: Brightcove, Kaltura, JW Player (enterprise OTT and large media vendors do not offer self-service trials at meaningful scale). For mid-market and enterprise, run a 60 to 90 day proof-of-value with real content, CRM integration, and at least one real campaign before committing to multi-year contracts.
How does video marketing software overlap with webinar software and screen recording tools?
There are three adjacent categories. (1) Video marketing and hosting (this ranking), async sales video, marketing video hosting, OTT, and async messaging at team scale. (2) Webinar and virtual events software, live and on-demand webinars, multi-session conferences, content hubs for demand-gen; Zoom Events, ON24, Goldcast, BigMarker lead. (3) Pure screen recording and lightweight video tools, Loom historically straddles this but the heart of Loom is async messaging at team scale. Most B2B organizations end up with a webinar tool (for events), a video marketing host (Vidyard for sales, Wistia for marketing, Loom for internal async), and either built-in conferencing recording or a lightweight standalone tool. Picking one platform for all three jobs is the most common mistake.
What about open-source or self-hosted video alternatives?
Self-hosted and open-source video options exist (PeerTube, MediaCMS, JW Player Open Source for player only, Kaltura Community Edition historically) but the operational burden, CDN cost, transcoding pipeline, DRM support, and integration work add up fast once you account for engineering time. For B2B sales video and marketing-led hosting the build-versus-buy math almost always favors buying. For OTT, broadcast, or large publishers with engineering depth, self-hosted components combined with managed CDN (AWS Elemental, Akamai, Mux) can make sense. Kaltura's open-source heritage is unusual in this category and is one reason it remains a leader for higher-education customization. For most B2B buyers in 2026, default to a managed platform and only consider self-hosted if you have a specific scale or customization requirement that managed vendors cannot meet.

Final word

Looking at a different market? See the global Video Marketing and Hosting Software ranking, or pick another country at the top of this page.

Last updated 2026-05-23. Local pricing reverified quarterly. Found something inaccurate? Tell us.