Skip to content
Z Zendikt
Canada edition · 10 products ranked · Verified 2026-05-27

Top 10 Physical Security Assessment Software in Canada for 2026

Canadian physical security ranking with Genetec (Montreal) on top, CAD pricing, CCCS critical infrastructure guidance, Bill C-26 CCSPA and PIPEDA video-surveillance reality.

Canada verdict (TL;DR)

Verified 2026-05-27

Genetec (Montreal) is the Canadian physical-security and video-surveillance champion, with deep penetration at Toronto Pearson, Vancouver International, Montreal Trudeau, Canadian banks and federal buildings. For risk-assessment workflows specifically, Resolver (Toronto) is also Canadian-built and the strongest local fit. Circadian Risk, RiskWatch, SafetyCulture and D3 Security round out the assessment-software tier; LogicGate, Riskonnect, Omnigo and Trackforce-Valiant serve adjacent GRC and guard-tour needs. CCCS critical-infrastructure guidance under Bill C-26 (CCSPA) increasingly drives buying decisions at federally-regulated and critical-infrastructure operators.

Picks for Canada

  • Canadian enterprise wanting the Canadian-built risk-assessment platform: resolver Resolver (Toronto) is Canadian-built and the strongest local fit for physical security risk assessment, threat assessment and case management. Used by Canadian banks, retailers and critical-infrastructure operators.
  • Canadian airport, transit, bank or government building wanting unified VMS + access control: genetec Genetec (Montreal) is the Canadian video-management and access-control giant, used at Toronto Pearson, Vancouver International, Montreal Trudeau, RBC, TD and federal government facilities. The natural assessment-platform pair for any Genetec-installed site.
  • Canadian critical-infrastructure operator wrangling Bill C-26 CCSPA: resolver Resolver supports the documentation, control mapping and incident workflows that Bill C-26 designated operators (banks, telecom, transport, energy) will need. Pair with CCCS PROTECTED B guidance.
  • Field-based safety + security inspection across multiple Canadian sites: safetyculture SafetyCulture's mobile-first inspection workflow is widely used by Canadian retail, hospitality and resource operators (Loblaws, Suncor, Cenovus) for combined safety + security walk-throughs.
  • University, hospital or transit operator wanting incident + dispatch: omnigo Omnigo is the long-running incident-management and dispatch platform used by Canadian universities, hospitals and transit operators for security operations centres.
Market context

How the physical security assessment software market looks in Canada

Canadian physical-security software is uniquely shaped by Genetec, the Montreal-headquartered video-management-system and access-control vendor founded by Pierre Racz in 1997 and now the dominant Canadian player in physical security technology overall. Genetec's Security Center is the default VMS + access-control platform at Toronto Pearson International, Vancouver International, Montreal Trudeau, the City of Calgary, RBC, TD and a long list of federal government facilities and critical-infrastructure operators. For risk-assessment workflows specifically, Resolver (Toronto) is the Canadian-built incumbent, used by Canadian banks, major retailers and critical-infrastructure operators for security risk assessment, threat assessment, investigations and case management.

Around these two Canadian champions sits a smaller tier of assessment-specialist vendors. Circadian Risk and RiskWatch focus on physical-security assessment templates and gap analysis. SafetyCulture (Australian-built) is heavily used by Canadian retail, hospitality and resource operators for mobile inspections that combine safety and security. D3 Security is Canadian-founded (Vancouver) but pivoted toward SOAR and is more often a cybersecurity buy. LogicGate and Riskonnect serve adjacent GRC needs that include physical security as one risk category. Omnigo is the long-running incident-management and dispatch platform at Canadian universities, hospitals and transit operators. Trackforce-Valiant is the dominant guard-tour and workforce-management platform for contract security firms.

Compliance is reshaping Canadian physical-security buying. Bill C-26 (Critical Cyber Systems Protection Act, expected proclamation 2026) imposes cybersecurity obligations on designated operators of critical cyber systems across telecommunications, finance, energy, transportation and federally-regulated industries; this includes physical-security systems that depend on networked infrastructure. CCCS (Canadian Centre for Cyber Security) PROTECTED B guidance and ITSG-33 apply to federal-government and SSC Cloud deployments. PIPEDA governs video-surveillance footage as personal information federally; Quebec Law 25 imposes equivalent obligations in Quebec including consent for biometric processing. Provincial labour codes affect guard-management workflows. AWS Canada Central (Montreal), AWS Canada West (Calgary), Azure Canada Central (Toronto) and GCP Montreal/Toronto are the common residency options. Genetec, Resolver, RiskWatch and SafetyCulture all clear the residency bar; some smaller vendors require enterprise-tier upsell.

Compliance & local rules

Canadian physical-security software compliance starts with PIPEDA and Quebec Law 25 governing video-surveillance footage and access-control logs as personal information, with breach notification to the OPC and Commission d'acces a l'information respectively. Quebec Law 25 specifically requires explicit consent for biometric processing (facial recognition, fingerprint) and privacy-impact assessments for new systems. Bill C-26 (Critical Cyber Systems Protection Act, expected proclamation 2026) imposes cybersecurity obligations on designated operators of critical cyber systems across telecom, finance, energy, transport and federally-regulated industries, including the physical-security and surveillance systems that depend on those networks. The Canadian Centre for Cyber Security publishes ITSG-33 and PROTECTED B guidance for federal-government and SSC Cloud deployments; vendors selling to federal departments must align. OSFI B-13 (technology and cyber risk management) applies to federally-regulated financial institutions and increasingly includes physical-security systems in scope. Provincial labour codes (Ontario ESA, BC ESA, Alberta ESC, Quebec LNT) affect guard-management workflows. Provincial private-investigator and security-guard licensing acts (Ontario PSISA, BC SSA, Alberta SGSI Act, Quebec BSP) regulate guard-management product use. Canadian data residency on AWS Canada Central (Montreal), AWS Canada West (Calgary), Azure Canada Central (Toronto) or GCP Montreal/Toronto is increasingly contractual.

At a glance

Quick comparison, ranked for Canada

Product Best for Starts at 10-emp/mo* Pricing G2 Geo
3 Resolver (a Kroll Business)
Enterprise integrated risk programs across all sectors
Quote - 4.4 North America +4
9 Genetec Security Center + Mission Control
Airports, transit, universities, casinos, Fortune 500 corporate
$0 + $0/emp $0 4.5 Global; strong in North America, EU, Middle East, APAC
1 Circadian Risk
Corporate security teams, consulting firms, multi-site enterprises
Quote - 4.7 United States +3
2 RiskWatch (SecureWatch)
Government, defense, banking, healthcare, Fortune 1000
Quote - 4.5 United States +3
4 SafetyCulture (iAuditor)
Multi-location ops across security, retail, hospitality, manufacturing
$0 + $0/emp $0 4.6 Global; strong in US, UK, AU, EU
5 D3 Security
Utilities, critical infrastructure, large corporate security
Quote - 4.4 North America +2
10 Riskonnect
Large enterprise integrated risk programs
Quote - 4.3 Global; 6 continents
6 LogicGate Risk Cloud
Modern mid-market and enterprise GRC programs
Quote - 4.5 North America +2
8 Omnigo
Healthcare, gaming, education, public safety
Quote - 4.2 United States +1
7 Trackforce Valiant
Contract security firms; large guard-using corporate security
Quote - 4.3 North America +3

*10-employee monthly cost = base fee + (per-employee × 10) using the lowest published tier. For opaque-pricing vendors, no value is shown.

Verified local pricing

What buyers in Canada actually pay

Median annual deal size by employee band, in CAD. Crowdsourced from anonymized buyer disclosures.

Product Employee band Median annual (CAD) Sample Notes
Resolver (a Kroll Business) Mid-market (100-500 employees) CA$75,000 15 Resolver Risk Management standard tier
Resolver (a Kroll Business) Enterprise (banks, critical infrastructure) CA$245,000 9 Resolver enterprise with investigations + case management
Genetec Security Center + Mission Control Mid-size facility (100-500 cameras) CA$95,000 22 Security Center licence + maintenance
SafetyCulture (iAuditor) Multi-site retail / resources CA$42,000 18 Premium tier per active user
RiskWatch (SecureWatch) Mid-market CA$38,000 7 RiskWatch assessment library + custom questionnaires
Circadian Risk Enterprise multi-site CA$68,000 6 Circadian Risk assessment + planning tier
Local challengers

Canada-built or Canada-strong vendors worth knowing

Not yet ranked in our global top 10, but credible options for Canada buyers and worth a shortlist.

Genetec

Visit ↗

Montreal-headquartered. The dominant Canadian video-management-system and access-control vendor, used at Toronto Pearson, Vancouver International, Montreal Trudeau, RBC, TD and federal government facilities. The natural assessment-platform pair for any Genetec-installed site.

Resolver

Visit ↗

Toronto-headquartered. Canadian-built risk-assessment, threat-assessment and case-management platform for physical security and corporate security teams. Used by Canadian banks, major retailers and critical-infrastructure operators.

D3 Security

Visit ↗

Vancouver-founded. Originally physical-security incident management, now SOAR-focused but still relevant for Canadian SOC + physical-security convergence use cases.

The Canada ranking

All 10, ranked for Canada

Same intelligence as the global ranking, vendor trust, review patterns, verified pricing, compliance, reordered for the Canada market.

#3

Resolver (a Kroll Business)

Integrated risk intelligence with mature physical security workflows.

Founded 2001 · Toronto, Canada · private · 500–50,000+ employees
G2 4.4 (246)
Capterra 4.3
Custom quote
○ Sales call required
Visit Resolver (a Kroll Business)

Resolver is a full-stack integrated risk management platform that happens to have one of the most mature physical security modules in the market. Founded in 2001 in Toronto and acquired by Kroll in 2022, Resolver brings the credibility and resources of a Big 4-adjacent advisory firm to its product. For organizations that already think about risk in an integrated way, physical, cyber, brand, third-party, Resolver is the most natural home for the physical security workflow. For organizations that just want a focused physical security assessment tool, it can feel like overkill.

Best for

Enterprises with established integrated risk management programs (1,000+ employees, multi-function risk teams) where physical security is one risk vertical among several.

Worst for

Pure physical security teams with no broader GRC needs, or anyone needing fast self-serve onboarding under $20K.

Strengths

  • Mature physical security risk module covering assessments, incidents, investigations, and threats
  • Kroll backing (since 2022) provides advisory depth and threat intelligence integration
  • Integrated platform: same data model spans physical security, ERM, third-party risk, internal audit
  • 728+ employees; serves 1,000+ global enterprise customers safeguarding $6.5T market cap
  • Configurable drag-and-drop dashboards for executive reporting
  • Strong incident management with case linking to vulnerability assessments
  • Available in multiple languages with regional data residency options

Weaknesses

  • Pricing is opaque; cited as "costly for small or startup companies" across G2 reviews
  • Implementation runs 8–16 weeks for full IRM deployment; faster for narrower physical-only configurations
  • Configurability cuts both ways, can become a custom-build project requiring ongoing admin time
  • Mobile experience is functional but not a differentiator
  • Reporting capabilities are powerful but require admin training to fully exploit
  • Post-Kroll integration roadmap continues to evolve; legacy customers occasionally cite shifting priorities

Pricing tiers

opaque
  • Core (per application)
    Per Resolver application: Physical Security, Incident Management, Investigations, etc.
    Quote
  • Risk Intelligence Platform
    Multi-application bundle for integrated risk programs
    Quote
Watch for
  • · Implementation services typically separate; budget 15–30% of first-year subscription
  • · Multi-application bundles offer better unit economics than single-app licensing
  • · Multi-year contracts standard; annual discounts negotiated

Key features

  • +Physical security risk and assessment management
  • +Incident management with case investigations
  • +Threat and intelligence management
  • +Integrated audit and compliance modules
  • +Configurable workflows and approvals
  • +Drag-and-drop dashboard builder
  • +ESRM (Enterprise Security Risk Management) frameworks
  • +Bidirectional integration with ServiceNow, Jira, and major SIEMs
100+ integrations
ServiceNowMicrosoft 365OktaSalesforceSplunkJira
Geography
North America · EU · UK · APAC · New Zealand
#9

Genetec Security Center + Mission Control

PSIM-class operations with assessment via Security Design Center.

Founded 1997 · Montreal, Canada · private · 500–100,000+ employees
G2 4.5 (320)
Capterra 4.5
From $0 + $0 /mo + /employee
○ Sales call required
Visit Genetec Security Center + Mission Control

Genetec is one of the two dominant unified physical security platforms (the other being Milestone), used by airports, transit systems, casinos, universities, and Fortune 500 corporates for video, access control, and operations. The assessment story has two parts: Security Design Center is a free design-tool used during planning and audit phases to model camera coverage, access control deployment, and infrastructure layouts; Mission Control adds incident workflow and decision-support to operational events. Combined, this is the right answer for organizations that have already standardized on Genetec hardware and want one vendor to handle the whole operations + assessment lifecycle. For organizations that haven't made that bet, the lock-in is significant.

Best for

Organizations that have standardized on Genetec hardware and want unified VMS, access control, and operations on one vendor.

Worst for

Multi-vendor environments, dedicated assessment use cases without operations needs, or buyers wanting transparent SaaS pricing.

Strengths

  • Tightest integration with Genetec Omnicast (VMS) and Synergis (access control)
  • Security Design Center (free) for camera coverage and access control planning during assessment
  • Mission Control adds structured incident workflows with decision-support and audit trail
  • Genetec Stratocast SaaS option reduces on-prem infrastructure burden
  • Best for transit, airport, casino, and university operations centers
  • Mature partner ecosystem; certified integrators in every major market
  • Battle-tested at extreme scale; runs city-scale deployments globally

Weaknesses

  • Assessment capability is bolted onto an operations platform, not a dedicated assessment workflow
  • Strongly proprietary ecosystem; integration with non-Genetec VMS/access control is limited
  • Pricing is hardware/license bundle, not transparent SaaS, expect 8–16 weeks of vendor + integrator engagement
  • On-prem deployments require significant IT infrastructure investment
  • UX optimized for control-room operators, not assessment-focused security analysts
  • Mission Control workflows are limited compared to dedicated incident platforms; operators "can only acknowledge and forward" per IPVM analysis

Pricing tiers

opaque
  • Security Design Center
    Free design tool for planning camera and access control deployments
    $0+$0 /mo +/emp
  • Security Center (per channel/door)
    Licensing scales with camera and access control hardware
    Quote
  • Mission Control
    Add-on for structured incident workflows on Security Center
    Quote
Watch for
  • · Hardware refresh cycles every 5–7 years
  • · Certified integrator services billable separately
  • · Module licensing (LPR, intrusion, intercom) priced individually
  • · Annual support and maintenance contracts

Key features

  • +Unified VMS (Omnicast) + access control (Synergis)
  • +Security Design Center (planning and assessment)
  • +Mission Control incident workflow
  • +License plate recognition (AutoVu)
  • +Cloud-managed Stratocast option
  • +Federation across multi-site deployments
  • +Mobile guard and operator apps
  • +Map-based operations dashboard
150+ integrations
Active Directory / Azure ADServiceNowSplunkmajor access control hardwarevideo analytics partners
Geography
Global; strong in North America, EU, Middle East, APAC
#1

Circadian Risk

Floor-plan-native physical security risk assessment.

Founded 2016 · Ann Arbor, MI · private · 50–10,000 employees
G2 4.7 (90)
Capterra 4.8
Custom quote
○ Sales call required
Visit Circadian Risk

Circadian Risk is the most modern dedicated physical security assessment platform. Where competitors retrofit risk modules onto generic GRC engines, Circadian Risk was built from day one for the specific workflow of a physical security professional walking a facility, marking vulnerabilities on a floor plan, scoring them against threats and impact, and producing a defensible report. The product feels purpose-designed in a way the rest of the category does not. The trade-off: smaller company than RiskWatch or Resolver, narrower integration breadth, and pricing that requires a sales conversation.

Best for

Corporate security teams and security consulting firms doing periodic, in-depth, floor-plan-based assessments at 5–500 facilities.

Worst for

Buyers who need a 24/7 operations platform, sub-$10K annual budget, or fully transparent self-serve pricing.

Strengths

  • Floor-plan-based vulnerability mapping, drop pins on visual building plans, link them to standards-based risk frameworks
  • Industry-specific compliance modules: data centers, healthcare, K-12, higher ed, government, banking, retail
  • Modern web UX, most reviewers cite "feels like 2026 software" vs. competitors that feel like 2010 software
  • Strong out-of-box risk frameworks: ASIS, ISO 31000, FEMA P-1000, NFPA, ISC, CPTED
  • Multi-site dashboard with portfolio-level views and trend analytics
  • White-glove onboarding included; most customers are operational in under 30 days

Weaknesses

  • Pricing is fully opaque; reported deals range $20K–$100K+ annually depending on site count and modules
  • Smaller integration ecosystem than Resolver or LogicGate, works as a stand-alone, not a hub
  • Younger company (founded 2016), less category gravity than 30-year incumbents
  • No PSIM-style real-time operations features; this is an assessment tool, not a 24/7 SOC platform
  • Mobile experience is web-responsive, not a native iOS/Android app, slower than SafetyCulture for field use

Pricing tiers

opaque
  • Standard
    Single-org assessment platform with floor plan mapping, risk scoring, reporting
    Quote
  • Enterprise
    Multi-org/multi-tenant for consulting firms; portfolio analytics; white-label reports
    Quote
Watch for
  • · Annual contracts standard; no monthly option
  • · Implementation typically included; complex deployments may incur add-on PS fees
  • · Add-on industry compliance modules priced separately in some configurations

Key features

  • +Floor-plan-based vulnerability marking
  • +Threat/vulnerability/impact risk-scoring engine
  • +Industry compliance frameworks (data center, healthcare, education, banking, government)
  • +Multi-site portfolio dashboard
  • +Photo and document attachment to findings
  • +Customizable assessment templates
  • +Remediation tracking with assignees and due dates
  • +PDF and Word report generation
25+ integrations
ServiceNowJiraMicrosoft TeamsSlackOkta
Geography
United States · Canada · United Kingdom · EU
#2

RiskWatch (SecureWatch)

Three decades of compliance-heavy physical security assessment.

Founded 1993 · Annapolis, MD · private · 500–50,000+ employees
G2 4.5 (50)
Capterra 4.6
Custom quote
○ Sales call required
Visit RiskWatch (SecureWatch)

RiskWatch, sold under the SecureWatch product brand, has been doing physical security assessment software since the early 1990s. The company's longevity and customer roster (Fortune 100, US Department of Defense, federal agencies) buy real category authority. The product itself is automation-heavy: data collection, risk scoring, and report generation are templated against 35+ pre-built compliance frameworks, which is what enables the platform's headline claim of 74% time reduction vs. spreadsheet-based assessments. The trade-off: the UX shows its age, the brand recognition outside government and large enterprise is modest, and pricing is opaque.

Best for

Defense contractors, federal agencies, banks, healthcare networks, and Fortune 1000 with deep compliance frameworks (ISO, NIST, FFIEC) and 100+ sites.

Worst for

Mid-market without compliance pressure, buyers who want modern UX over deep compliance, anyone under $25K budget.

Strengths

  • 30+ year track record; one of the few vendors that has survived multiple GRC market cycles
  • 35+ pre-built compliance libraries: ISO 27001, HIPAA, PCI DSS, NIST 800-53, FFIEC, ASIS, FEMA, more
  • Used by Fortune 100, US DoD, federal civilian agencies, strong gov/regulated-industry credibility
  • Heatmap and Google Maps integration for visualizing risk across geographically distributed sites
  • 24/7 chat support with live representatives
  • Cloud architecture is mature; deployments run reliably at 1,000+ site scale

Weaknesses

  • UX feels like enterprise software from a previous decade compared to Circadian Risk or LogicGate
  • Pricing is fully opaque; quotes vary widely; expect 4–8 weeks of sales cycle
  • Brand recognition is concentrated in defense and Fortune 100; less known to mid-market buyers
  • Implementation is more involved than Circadian Risk; expect 4–8 weeks for a 50-site deployment
  • Limited modern integration count, fewer than 50 first-class integrations listed
  • Mobile experience trails best-in-class field-inspection tools

Pricing tiers

opaque
  • SecureWatch Physical Security
    Core physical security assessment + compliance libraries
    Quote
  • SecureWatch Enterprise GRC
    Bundle: physical, cyber, vendor risk, policy management
    Quote
Watch for
  • · Multi-year contracts common; published rate cards do not exist publicly
  • · Add-on compliance frameworks beyond included library may incur fees
  • · Professional services for custom report templates not always bundled

Key features

  • +35+ pre-built compliance libraries
  • +Automated data collection via questionnaire workflows
  • +Heatmap and Google Maps risk visualization
  • +Multi-site portfolio dashboards
  • +Bidirectional sync with major GRC platforms
  • +Assessment scheduling and recurring assessment automation
  • +Customizable report templates by industry/regulation
  • +Threat intelligence integration
50+ integrations
ServiceNowMicrosoft Power BITableauSharePointSplunk
Geography
United States · Canada · EU · APAC (Fortune 1000 footprint)
#4

SafetyCulture (iAuditor)

Mobile-first inspection platform with the only transparent pricing in the category.

Founded 2004 · Sydney, Australia · private · 10–10,000 employees
G2 4.6 (220)
Capterra 4.6
From $0 + $0 /mo + /employee
● Transparent pricing
Visit SafetyCulture (iAuditor)

SafetyCulture is the wildcard on this list. It was not built specifically for physical security assessment, it was built as a generic mobile inspection platform (originally branded iAuditor) for any field-based audit workflow, from food safety to construction QA to retail compliance. But its template engine is flexible enough that thousands of security teams use it for site walks, perimeter inspections, access control audits, and post-incident reviews. And it has the only transparent published pricing in this entire category at $24/user/month. For teams whose primary need is mobile site walks rather than full risk-scoring workflows, it is wildly more accessible than the dedicated platforms above.

Best for

Smaller corporate security teams, multi-location retail/hospitality security ops, and consulting firms whose primary workflow is mobile site walks with photo evidence and corrective actions.

Worst for

Regulated-industry buyers needing pre-built ASIS/NIST/ISC frameworks, or anyone who wants out-of-box threat/vulnerability/impact risk modeling.

Strengths

  • Transparent published pricing: $24/user/month Premium plan, billed annually, only platform on this list with self-serve pricing
  • 30-day free trial, no credit card required, actually evaluate before buying
  • Best-in-category native mobile apps (iOS, Android) with offline mode and photo/video capture
  • Drag-and-drop template builder; convert paper checklists or Excel spreadsheets into smart digital inspections in hours
  • Real-time analytics dashboards across thousands of inspections
  • Used by 1M+ users globally across many industries, strong feature gravity from cross-industry feedback
  • Strong corrective-action workflow ties findings to assignees and due dates

Weaknesses

  • Not purpose-built for physical security risk assessment, no built-in ASIS, FEMA, NFPA, or ISC frameworks (you build your own)
  • No floor-plan-based vulnerability mapping like Circadian Risk
  • Risk-scoring is checkbox-based, not threat/vulnerability/impact modeled
  • Limited compliance library compared to RiskWatch, DIY for regulated-industry customers
  • Generic platform means physical security UX is whatever templates your team builds
  • Per-seat pricing scales linearly with team size, can exceed dedicated platforms at 50+ users

Pricing tiers

public
  • Free
    Up to 10 inspections/month; basic features
    $0+$0 /mo +/emp
  • Premium
    Unlimited inspections, integrations, analytics, scheduling
    $24 /emp/mo
  • Enterprise
    Custom: SSO, advanced security, priority support, custom training
    Quote
Watch for
  • · Add-on modules (heads-up training, sensors) priced separately
  • · Annual billing required for published rate; monthly slightly higher

Key features

  • +Mobile-native iOS and Android apps with offline mode
  • +Drag-and-drop template builder
  • +Photo, video, and signature capture
  • +Real-time corrective action workflow
  • +Analytics dashboards across all inspections
  • +Scheduling and recurring inspections
  • +Asset and equipment tracking
  • +Multi-language support
75+ integrations
Microsoft TeamsSlackPower BIZapierSalesforceServiceNow
Geography
Global; strong in US, UK, AU, EU
#5

D3 Security

Security operations platform with native physical assessment.

Founded 2002 · Vancouver, Canada · private · 500–50,000 employees
G2 4.4 (75)
Capterra 4.5
Custom quote
○ Sales call required
Visit D3 Security

D3 Security pre-dates the term "SOAR", the company has been building security operations and incident management platforms for over 20 years and has gradually expanded into both cyber SOAR and physical security. The unique angle is that D3 unifies dispatch, guard tour, incident reporting, and physical assessment in one platform, which can replace what older organizations stitch together from a PSIM, a guard management tool, and an assessment tool. Customers report this consolidation produces 80–90% reductions in mean-time-to-respond for incidents tied to assessment-identified vulnerabilities.

Best for

Critical infrastructure (utilities, energy, transit), in-house corporate security teams running 24/7 ops, and organizations that want assessment-to-incident-to-response on one platform.

Worst for

Pure-assessment buyers with no operational needs, small consulting firms, anyone who wants modern self-serve onboarding.

Strengths

  • Unifies physical assessment with active operations, incident, dispatch, guard tour all share data
  • Mature 20+ year platform with strong critical-infrastructure and utilities customer base
  • Used by major utilities for site assessments on 30/60-month recurring schedules with automated reminders
  • Strong report generation with ability to redact sensitive information for third-party reviews
  • Database-of-repeat-offenders pattern: link incidents to entities, surface trends across assessments
  • API-first architecture, strong fit for teams with engineering resources to extend the platform
  • Customer support is well-rated for technical depth on complex deployments

Weaknesses

  • Brand awareness is lower than Resolver in physical-security-only contexts
  • UX is functional but not a differentiator; not the platform you pick to delight end users
  • Pricing is opaque; expect quote ranges aligned with mid-market enterprise GRC
  • Heavy feature set means longer learning curve for new users
  • Implementation runs 6–12 weeks; not a fast self-serve product
  • Recent strategic emphasis on cyber SOAR; physical security feature investment less visible

Pricing tiers

opaque
  • D3 Smart SOAR (Cyber)
    Cyber SOAR / SOC automation
    Quote
  • D3 Security Operations
    Physical security incident, dispatch, assessment, guard tour
    Quote
Watch for
  • · Multi-year contracts common
  • · Implementation services priced separately
  • · API integration work for non-standard sources may incur PS fees

Key features

  • +Physical security incident management
  • +Site assessment with recurring schedules
  • +Dispatch and guard tour management
  • +Investigation case management
  • +Entities database (repeat offenders, persons of interest)
  • +Customizable report templates with redaction
  • +Real-time dashboards and alerts
  • +Integration with VMS, access control, and SIEM platforms
200+ integrations
GenetecMilestoneLenelSplunkServiceNowMicrosoft Sentinel
Geography
North America · EU · APAC
#10

Riskonnect

Enterprise integrated risk management with physical security as one risk vertical.

Founded 2007 · Atlanta, GA · pe backed · 1,000–100,000+ employees
G2 4.3 (130)
Capterra 4.2
Custom quote
○ Sales call required
Visit Riskonnect

Riskonnect is one of the largest pure-play integrated risk management vendors with 2,000+ customers across six continents and particularly deep penetration in healthcare, financial services, and insurance. The platform was originally built on Salesforce and has since become its own architecture. The physical security capability is best understood as part of the broader IRM proposition: the value is greatest when physical risk lives alongside cyber risk, claims management, business continuity, and ERM on a single data model. As a standalone physical security assessment tool, it is overbuilt; as part of an integrated risk strategy, it has few equals.

Best for

Enterprises with established integrated risk programs (insurance, healthcare, financial services, energy) treating physical security as one risk vertical alongside claims, BCM, and ERM.

Worst for

Pure physical security teams, organizations under 1,000 employees, or anyone primarily evaluating physical security tools without a broader IRM program.

Strengths

  • 2,000+ customers across 6 continents, largest integrated risk customer base on this list
  • Deep penetration in healthcare, financial services, insurance, and energy, verticals where physical and operational risk converge
  • Strongest claims management and insurance-related workflows of any product on this list
  • Mature business continuity and crisis management modules
  • Extensive integration breadth driven by Salesforce-native heritage
  • Strong reporting and dashboarding for executive risk committees

Weaknesses

  • Pricing is opaque and skewed enterprise; rarely a fit under $75K annual
  • Implementation runs 12–24 weeks for full IRM; physical-only configurations faster
  • Configurability requires significant admin investment, not a turn-on product
  • Outside insurance/healthcare/financial-services, the value proposition is weaker
  • PE ownership has driven multiple product-line consolidations; some customers report transition friction
  • Physical security is a smaller share of the platform's total feature surface than at Resolver or RiskWatch

Pricing tiers

opaque
  • Riskonnect IRM
    Modular: ERM, claims, business continuity, third-party risk, internal audit
    Quote
  • Riskonnect Health & Safety
    Bundle for healthcare and high-hazard industries
    Quote
Watch for
  • · Implementation services priced separately; budget 20–40% of first-year subscription
  • · Multi-year contracts standard at enterprise pricing
  • · Module-by-module licensing means costs grow with adoption

Key features

  • +Integrated risk management across cyber, physical, operational
  • +Claims management
  • +Business continuity and crisis management
  • +Health and safety incident management
  • +Third-party risk
  • +Internal audit
  • +Salesforce-native integration patterns
  • +Executive risk dashboards
200+ integrations
SalesforceMicrosoft 365ServiceNowWorkdaySAP
Geography
Global; 6 continents
#6

LogicGate Risk Cloud

No-code GRC with custom physical security applications.

Founded 2015 · Chicago, IL · private · 200–10,000 employees
G2 4.5 (180)
Capterra 4.5
Custom quote
○ Sales call required
Visit LogicGate Risk Cloud

LogicGate is the modern, no-code answer to legacy GRC. Where Resolver brings depth from 20+ years and Riskonnect from heavy enterprise integration, LogicGate brings speed: customers build their own physical security application using drag-and-drop workflow design, often in days rather than the months a traditional GRC implementation requires. LogicGate was named a Leader in The Forrester Wave™: Third-Party Risk Management Platforms, Q1 2026, the platform sits at the intersection of GRC and physical security as a do-it-yourself solution.

Best for

Mid-market security teams with strong process design skills who want a platform they can shape, not one that constrains them.

Worst for

Teams that want a pre-built physical security application out-of-the-box, or organizations without admin bandwidth to maintain configurations.

Strengths

  • Forrester Wave Leader for TPRM Q1 2026; strong category recognition
  • No-code platform: build custom physical security workflows in days without engineering resources
  • 40+ purpose-built apps including risk, compliance, vendor risk, audit, and policy
  • AI-driven workflows with anomaly detection and auto-categorization
  • Real-time dashboards for executive risk reporting
  • Active community of customer-built apps shared across the platform
  • Strong integration story: ServiceNow, Jira, Slack, major IDPs, and SIEMs

Weaknesses

  • No pre-built physical security application, you (or LogicGate PS) build it from primitives
  • Best ROI requires investing in admin training; not a self-running product
  • Pricing is opaque; mid-market customers report $50K–$150K+ annual contracts
  • Younger company than Resolver/RiskWatch, less category gravity in physical-security-first conversations
  • Configurability cuts both ways, implementations can drift into custom-build territory
  • Smaller customer base in pure physical security; stronger in cyber and third-party risk

Pricing tiers

opaque
  • Risk Cloud (per application)
    Pricing varies by application count and seat tier
    Quote
  • Risk Cloud Platform Bundle
    Multi-application bundle; better unit economics
    Quote
Watch for
  • · Implementation services billable separately; budget 15–25% of first-year subscription
  • · Custom application development via LogicGate Professional Services
  • · Annual price escalators on multi-year contracts

Key features

  • +No-code workflow design
  • +40+ pre-built GRC applications
  • +AI-driven workflow automation
  • +Custom application builder
  • +Real-time risk dashboards
  • +Risk Cloud Marketplace (community-built apps)
  • +Native integrations with ServiceNow, Jira, Okta, Slack
  • +Audit trail and version control on workflows
100+ integrations
ServiceNowJiraOktaSlackMicrosoft Power BISalesforce
Geography
North America · EU · APAC
#8

Omnigo

Vertical-specialized security software for healthcare, gaming, and education.

Founded 1994 · Cleveland, OH · pe backed · 100–10,000 employees
G2 4.2 (220)
Capterra 4.4
Custom quote
○ Sales call required
Visit Omnigo

Omnigo (formerly Report Exec) has built a deep moat in specific verticals where physical security is heavily regulated and operationally distinct, healthcare (Joint Commission, hospital security), gaming (state gaming boards, casino security), higher education (Clery Act compliance), and K-12. The product covers incident management, dispatch, investigation, and assessment, all configured for the regulatory peculiarities of each vertical. For an organization in those specific industries, Omnigo will hit the ground running where a horizontal platform will require months of customization. The trade-off: outside those verticals, the value proposition is weaker.

Best for

Hospitals, casinos, universities, K-12 districts, and law enforcement agencies that need vertical-specific compliance baked in.

Worst for

Buyers outside the core verticals (corporate security, manufacturing, retail), or anyone seeking a consistent, modern UX.

Strengths

  • 2,700+ customers concentrated in healthcare, gaming, education, hospitality, and law enforcement
  • 600+ law enforcement agencies, 400+ hospitals, 350+ casinos, 500+ K-12/higher-ed institutions
  • Vertical-specific compliance built-in: Clery Act (higher ed), Joint Commission (healthcare), state gaming regs
  • Unified incident, dispatch, investigation, and assessment workflows
  • Strong report generation with redaction for legal and regulatory contexts
  • Configurable to capture the unusual data fields each vertical needs (gaming pit incidents, Clery geography)

Weaknesses

  • Customer support quality has reportedly declined post-acquisition; recent reviews flag slower response times
  • Outside core verticals, the platform is competitive but not the default choice
  • UX shows its age compared to modern platforms like LogicGate and Circadian Risk
  • Pricing is opaque; reports of significant variability based on rep negotiation
  • Implementation runs 6–12 weeks for vertical-specific configurations
  • PE ownership has prompted product-roadmap uncertainty noted in customer reviews

Pricing tiers

opaque
  • Omnigo Public Safety
    Law enforcement agencies
    Quote
  • Omnigo Healthcare Security
    Hospitals; Joint Commission compliance
    Quote
  • Omnigo Gaming
    Casinos; state gaming compliance
    Quote
  • Omnigo Education Safety
    Higher ed (Clery) and K-12
    Quote
Watch for
  • · Vertical compliance configurations may require professional services
  • · Customer support tier limits on lower contracts
  • · Multi-year contracts standard

Key features

  • +Incident management and reporting
  • +Vertical compliance frameworks (Clery, Joint Commission, gaming)
  • +Investigation and case management
  • +Dispatch and CAD
  • +Site and asset assessment
  • +Photo and document evidence management
  • +Reporting with PDF export and redaction
  • +Mobile incident capture
75+ integrations
GenetecMilestoneLenelMicrosoft Power BICAD systems
Geography
United States · Canada
#7

Trackforce Valiant

Guard force management with bundled assessment workflows.

Founded 2003 · Saint-Laurent, Canada (also Newport Beach, CA) · pe backed · 50–10,000 employees
G2 4.3 (210)
Capterra 4.4
Custom quote
○ Sales call required
Visit Trackforce Valiant

Trackforce Valiant is the result of a multi-year roll-up of guard management software companies, Trackforce, Valiant, TrackTik, GuardTek, and Silvertrac all live under the same umbrella now. The product's natural center of gravity is guard scheduling, tour management, and incident reporting for security service firms (the companies that provide guards to retail, residential, and corporate clients). The physical security assessment capability is real but secondary, most useful when assessments are part of a larger guard service contract. If you need pure assessment software with no guard ops, Circadian Risk or RiskWatch are better fits.

Best for

Contract security service firms (those who provide guards to clients) and large in-house security operations with significant guard headcount that also need site assessments.

Worst for

Pure-assessment buyers with no guard force, small security consulting practices, or buyers who want unified UX across all modules.

Strengths

  • Strong guard force management bundled with assessment, best when both workflows live together
  • Mobile guard tour and check-in with NFC/QR/GPS verification
  • Real-time incident reporting from guards in the field
  • Used by major contract security firms; battle-tested at scale
  • Roll-up history means broad feature breadth across guard, tour, scheduling, payroll, billing
  • AI-powered route optimization and anomaly detection on tour data

Weaknesses

  • Assessment is secondary to guard management, not the depth of a dedicated platform
  • Feature consolidation across acquired brands is uneven; some legacy modules feel disconnected
  • Pricing reported $8–$15/guard/month for guard ops; assessment add-ons priced separately
  • UX inconsistency across acquired product lines (TrackTik, GuardTek, Silvertrac all have different UIs)
  • Limited fit for in-house corporate security without a guard contractor model
  • Reporting is strong on guard ops, lighter on risk-scoring methodologies

Pricing tiers

opaque
  • Guard Management Core
    Estimate $8–$15/guard/month based on customer disclosures
    $12 /emp/mo
  • Full Suite (Guard + Assessment + Reporting)
    Add-ons priced separately
    Quote
Watch for
  • · Implementation fees vary by site count
  • · Assessment module typically priced as add-on to guard ops
  • · Multi-year contracts common at enterprise tier

Key features

  • +Guard scheduling and shift management
  • +Mobile guard tour with NFC/QR/GPS verification
  • +Incident reporting from field
  • +Site assessment templates
  • +Time tracking and payroll integration
  • +Client billing for security service firms
  • +AI route optimization
  • +Real-time GPS dashboard
75+ integrations
QuickBooksADPSlackMicrosoft TeamsGenetecMilestone
Geography
North America · EU · UK · APAC

Frequently asked questions

The questions buyers actually ask before they sign.

Why is Genetec listed for Canadian buyers if it is mainly VMS + access control?
Genetec is the dominant Canadian physical-security technology vendor and the natural platform pair for any assessment workflow. For sites that already run Genetec Security Center, the assessment software must integrate with Genetec for incident, dispatch and audit-trail purposes. We list Genetec because no Canadian physical-security software discussion is complete without it, even though pure assessment workflows are stronger in Resolver, Circadian Risk or RiskWatch.
What does Bill C-26 CCSPA mean for physical security?
Bill C-26 (expected proclamation 2026) designates operators of critical cyber systems in telecom, finance, energy, transport and other federally-regulated industries and imposes cybersecurity obligations including incident reporting, security-program documentation, and risk management. Physical-security systems that depend on networked infrastructure fall in scope. Resolver, Genetec, RiskWatch and SafetyCulture all support the documentation and control-mapping workflows designated operators will need.
How does PIPEDA / Quebec Law 25 affect video surveillance?
Both treat video-surveillance footage and access-control logs as personal information. Quebec Law 25 additionally requires explicit consent for biometric processing (facial recognition, fingerprint) and privacy-impact assessments for new systems. Genetec, Resolver and the assessment specialists all support consent capture, retention policy and breach-notification workflows; some smaller vendors do not.
Do I need Canadian data residency?
If you are federally-regulated (OSFI B-13), federal-government (SSC Cloud, CCCS PROTECTED B) or processing Quebec resident data under Law 25, yes. AWS Canada Central (Montreal), AWS Canada West (Calgary), Azure Canada Central (Toronto) and GCP Montreal are common options. Genetec offers on-prem and Canadian-region cloud; Resolver runs on AWS Canada Central; SafetyCulture supports Canadian region on enterprise tier.
What's the difference between physical security assessment software and PSIM?
Assessment software is for periodic, in-depth evaluations of a facility's physical security posture, site walks, vulnerability mapping, risk scoring, and remediation tracking. PSIM (Physical Security Information Management) is for real-time operations: aggregating alarms, video, and access events from multiple systems into a single command-center workflow. They're complementary, not interchangeable. Some platforms (D3 Security, Genetec Mission Control, Resolver) handle both, but most organizations use a dedicated assessment tool plus a separate PSIM for ops.
How much should I budget for physical security assessment software?
For a single-site small organization using SafetyCulture, expect under $5K/year. For a mid-market multi-site deployment on Circadian Risk, RiskWatch, or LogicGate, budget $25K–$100K annually plus implementation. For enterprise GRC platforms (Resolver, Riskonnect), $75K–$300K+ is typical. Add 15–40% for implementation services on opaque-pricing platforms. Budget for a multi-year contract at enterprise tier, single-year deals are rare in this category.
Why is pricing so opaque in this category?
Two structural reasons. First, the buyers are mostly mid-market and enterprise security teams with budget authority and procurement processes, vendors optimize for high-touch sales rather than self-serve conversion. Second, deal sizes vary enormously based on site count, module mix, integration complexity, and contract length, making published rate cards genuinely difficult. SafetyCulture is the exception, they came from a product-led-growth tradition (mobile inspection apps for individual auditors) and never adopted enterprise sales pricing patterns.
Should I pick a dedicated platform or a GRC suite for physical security?
Pick a dedicated platform (Circadian Risk, RiskWatch) if physical security is your primary or only risk discipline, if you want fast onboarding, and if floor-plan-based vulnerability mapping is core to your workflow. Pick a GRC suite (Resolver, LogicGate, Riskonnect) if physical security is one of several risk verticals (cyber, operational, third-party, business continuity) and your organization wants one platform spanning all of them. The answer is usually obvious from your org chart: if you have a CSO who reports separately, dedicated platform; if you have a CRO who owns all risk, GRC suite.
What about free or open-source options?
Two free tools worth knowing: FEMA P-1000 series provides free building-security risk-assessment frameworks (paper-based, but useful as templates); Genetec Security Design Center is free for camera-coverage and access-control planning during the assessment phase. SafetyCulture's Free tier (10 inspections/month) handles small organizations doing simple site walks. Beyond these, the category does not have a viable open-source option that matches commercial functionality.
How do I evaluate without sitting through a sales demo?
SafetyCulture offers a 30-day free trial with no credit card. Genetec Security Design Center is free. Beyond those, every product in this category requires a demo. Shorten the sales cycle by sending a written RFP up front with: site count, expected user count, required compliance frameworks, integration requirements, and a request for itemized pricing including implementation, training, and multi-year terms. Vendors that won't answer in writing are telling you something.
Do these platforms handle physical security audits for compliance (SOC 2, HIPAA, PCI)?
Yes, but with different depth. RiskWatch and Resolver have the broadest pre-built compliance libraries (35+ frameworks). LogicGate and Circadian Risk have flexible-but-buildable frameworks. SafetyCulture handles compliance through customer-built templates. Omnigo handles vertical compliance (Clery, Joint Commission, gaming) deeply. The right answer depends on which specific regulations matter most, list them in your RFP and require vendors to show you the evidence collection, control-mapping, and audit-trail features.
How long does implementation typically take?
SafetyCulture: same-day for self-serve teams. Circadian Risk: 2–4 weeks for typical multi-site deployments. RiskWatch, D3 Security: 4–8 weeks. Resolver, LogicGate: 6–12 weeks. Riskonnect: 12–24 weeks for full IRM, faster for narrow physical-only scope. Genetec: 8–16 weeks involving certified integrator. Expect to pay for implementation services on every product except SafetyCulture; budget 15–40% of first-year subscription.

Final word

Looking at a different market? See the global Physical Security Assessment Software ranking, or pick another country at the top of this page.

Last updated 2026-05-27. Local pricing reverified quarterly. Found something inaccurate? Tell us.