United Kingdom verdict (TL;DR)
Verified 2026-05-18The UK OKR market tracks the US closely with a European lean. Quantive dominates UK mid-market and enterprise as pure-play OKR leader. Lattice OKRs and Profit.co have strong UK traction across the London scaleup cohort. Mooncamp (Cologne, German-built) is popular in UK because of EU/UK GDPR-native design and modern UX, ranking ahead of Perdoo for UK buyers. Microsoft Viva Goals is the default for UK Microsoft 365 E5 customers. Asana Goals is the default for UK Asana customers. UK post-Brexit GDPR is operationally distinct from EU GDPR; vendors with UK data residency (Quantive UK region, Microsoft UK datacenter) hold an advantage. Mooncamp stores data in EU; this is GDPR-adequate but not UK-datacenter.
Picks for United Kingdom
- UK mid-market + enterprise wanting OKR depth (200-5,000 employees): quantive Pure-play category leader. Deepest OKR workflow, strategy-execution depth, and UK GDPR-compatible data residency options. Used at UK Series B+ SaaS, fintech (Monzo-tier), and UK enterprise.
- UK mid-market wanting OKR + performance bundle: profit-co OKR + performance + 1-on-1s combined at transparent pricing. Strong UK mid-market adoption. GBP billing via reseller. Best bundled-OKR alternative to Lattice at lower price.
- UK Lattice performance management customers: lattice-okrs OKR module bundled with Lattice performance. Growing UK adoption in London tech scaleups already on Lattice. No separate purchase for Lattice customers.
- UK tech-forward mid-market wanting GDPR-native OKR with modern UX: mooncamp Cologne-built GDPR-first OKR platform. Modern UX rated 4.7 G2. EU data residency satisfies UK adequacy rules. Transparent pricing at €8-€12/user/month. Popular with UK tech mid-market.
- UK Microsoft 365 E5 customers: microsoft-viva-goals Bundled with Microsoft 365 E5. Zero marginal cost for E5 orgs. UK datacenter available. Default for UK public sector and enterprise already paying for E5.
- UK Asana customers: asana-goals OKR module native to Asana. Bundled with Asana Business and Enterprise. Strong UK Asana adoption in media, consulting, and tech sectors.
How the okr software market looks in United Kingdom
The UK OKR market closely parallels the US with three important distinctions: post-Brexit UK GDPR data residency matters differently from EU GDPR; the UK public sector (HMRC, NHS, central government) has distinct OKR tool requirements (often Microsoft-anchored via Crown Commercial Service agreements); and UK enterprise has a stronger SAP SuccessFactors installed base which routes some OKR demand through SAP Workpath.
London-tier SaaS scaleups (fintech, proptech, healthtech) are the most active OKR buyers in the UK. The 2018-2024 funding wave created a cohort of UK series B+ companies running Quantive or Lattice OKRs as their OKR layer. Profit.co has growing UK adoption as a bundled OKR + performance alternative at lower TCO than Lattice.
Mooncamp deserves specific UK attention: despite being German-built, Mooncamp ranks consistently well with UK buyers because of EU-GDPR-native design (which satisfies UK adequacy), transparent pricing, and modern UX. UK GDPR (post-Brexit) applies the same substantive data-protection obligations as EU GDPR; EU-GDPR-compliant vendors satisfy UK GDPR via the UK's adequacy decision for the EEA.
UK GDPR and Data Protection Act 2018 apply to employee OKR data for UK-based employees. Post-Brexit UK GDPR is operationally distinct from EU GDPR: EEA-to-UK transfers are permitted via UK adequacy decision for EEA, but UK-to-US transfers require a valid transfer mechanism (Standard Contractual Clauses, UK IDTA). Quantive, Mooncamp, Perdoo, Lattice, Asana, and Microsoft are all UK-GDPR-compatible; confirm data residency options if UK-only storage is required (Microsoft UK datacenter: yes; Quantive UK region: available on Enterprise; Mooncamp: EU only). ICO (Information Commissioner's Office) is the UK supervisory authority. Employee goal data is personal data under UK GDPR; retention periods (typically 2 years post-departure) and access controls must be documented in data-processing records (Article 30 equivalent UK GDPR).
Quick comparison, ranked for United Kingdom
| Product | Best for | Starts at | 10-emp/mo* | Pricing | G2 | Geo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Quantive | B2B SaaS + enterprise OKR-led orgs | $9 + $9/emp | $99 | 4.4 | Global; strongest in US, EU, UK | |
| 3 Profit.co | Mid-market wanting bundled depth | $0 | $0 | 4.7 | Global; strongest in US, India, EU | |
| 8 Lattice OKRs | Lattice customers | Quote | - | 4.6 | Global; strongest in US, UK, EU | |
| 2 Mooncamp | European tech-forward mid-market | $8 + $8/emp | $88 | 4.7 | Strongest in EU, UK; growing US | |
| 10 Microsoft Viva Goals | Microsoft 365 E5 customers | $57 + $57/emp | $627 | 4.2 | Global; aligned with Microsoft 365 availability | |
| 9 Asana Goals | Asana customers | $25 + $25/emp | $275 | 4.4 | Global; strongest in US, EU, UK, AU | |
| 4 Weekdone | SMB teams | $0 | $0 | 4.5 | Global; strongest in EU, US, UK | |
| 5 Perdoo | Mid-market wanting strategy-execution depth | $9 + $9/emp | $99 | 4.6 | Global; strongest in EU, US, UK | |
| 6 Workpath | European enterprises | Quote | - | 4.6 | Strongest in DACH (Germany/Austria/Switzerland), EU; growing UK | |
| 7 OKRify | Indian + South Asian mid-market | $0 | $0 | 4.7 | Strongest in India, Singapore, MENA; growing US/EU |
*10-employee monthly cost = base fee + (per-employee × 10) using the lowest published tier. For opaque-pricing vendors, no value is shown.
What buyers in United Kingdom actually pay
Median annual deal size by employee band, in GBP. Crowdsourced from anonymized buyer disclosures.
| Product | Employee band | Median annual (GBP) | Sample | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quantive | 50-200 employees | £9,500 | 38 | Essentials tier; GBP-billed via UK reseller |
| Quantive | 200-1,000 employees | £30,000 | 22 | Scale tier; GBP |
| Profit.co | 100-500 employees | £6,500 | 28 | Growth tier $7/user/mo; GBP-billed |
| Mooncamp | 50-200 employees | £7,000 | 18 | €8-€12/user/mo; GBP equivalent via card billing |
| Microsoft Viva Goals | Viva Goals standalone, 200-1,000 employees | £5,600 | 22 | ~£4.80/user/mo standalone; E5 bundle no extra cost |
United Kingdom-built or United Kingdom-strong vendors worth knowing
Not yet ranked in our global top 10, but credible options for United Kingdom buyers and worth a shortlist.
Hive Learning
Visit ↗London-built learning and OKR-adjacent performance platform. Used by UK enterprise (Sky, Unilever-tier) for learning + performance alignment. Not a pure-play OKR tool; evaluated here as UK-native performance-adjacent alternative.
Peoplebox (UK presence)
Visit ↗Bangalore-built but with growing UK customer base via remote sales. INR/USD pricing; GBP billing on request. Good alternative for UK mid-market wanting modern OKR + performance at lower TCO than Quantive.
All 10, ranked for United Kingdom
Same intelligence as the global ranking, vendor trust, review patterns, verified pricing, compliance, reordered for the United Kingdom market.
Quantive
Modern pure-play OKR category leader with strategy execution depth.
Quantive is the pure-play OKR category leader, founded 2015 as Gtmhub. Rebranded to Quantive in 2022 to signal expansion beyond pure OKRs into strategy execution. Last raised $120M Series C 2022. The platform centers on OKR cycle workflow + strategy-execution depth + multi-quarter initiative tracking. Strengths: deepest OKR cycle workflow in pure-play category, mature strategy-execution depth (multi-quarter initiatives, weighted KR scoring), AI features (Quantive AI for KR generation and progress sentiment), integration with major HRIS/performance/work-management platforms, and strong fit for orgs treating OKRs as dedicated workflow. Best fit for B2B SaaS mid-market and enterprise (200-5,000 employees) wanting OKR depth beyond bundled alternatives. Trade-offs: pricing meaningful + scales with seat count, bundled-OKR alternatives (Lattice, Asana, Microsoft) often included in existing subscriptions, customer support quality variable as company scaled, and Gtmhub-to-Quantive rebrand created brand recognition reset.
B2B SaaS mid-market + enterprise (200-5,000 employees) treating OKRs as dedicated strategy-execution workflow with multi-quarter initiative tracking needs.
Orgs already on Lattice/Asana/Microsoft wanting OKRs bundled (use those modules), early-stage startups (Weekdone simpler), or budget-conscious teams.
Strengths
- Deepest pure-play OKR cycle workflow
- Mature strategy-execution depth
- Quantive AI for KR generation
- Integration with major platforms
- Strong fit for OKR-dedicated orgs
- Bulgarian + US engineering culture
Weaknesses
- Pricing meaningful at scale
- Bundled-OKR alternatives often free with existing tools
- Customer support quality variable
- Gtmhub rebrand created brand reset
- Per-seat scaling at enterprise
- Less suited for OKRs-as-bonus-feature buyers
Pricing tiers
opaque- EssentialsPer-user/month; basic OKR features$9+$9 /mo +/emp
- Scale~$15K-$60K/year for mid-marketQuote
- Enterprise$60K-$200K+/yearQuote
- · Per-seat scaling
- · Implementation services ($10K-$80K)
- · Annual price increases of 6-10%
- · AI features at higher tiers
Key features
- +OKR cycle workflow
- +Strategy execution + multi-quarter initiatives
- +Weighted KR scoring
- +Quantive AI for KR generation
- +Alignment visualization
- +Cadence + check-in rituals
- +API access
- +100+ integrations
Profit.co
Comprehensive OKR plus performance plus 1-on-1s combined.
Profit.co is the comprehensive OKR + performance + 1-on-1s combined platform, founded 2018. Privately-held. The platform bundles OKRs + performance reviews + 1-on-1 meetings + employee engagement + task management in one tool. Strengths: combined OKR + performance bundle (reduces tool sprawl), mature OKR workflow, comprehensive performance management features, transparent pricing, and strong fit for mid-market wanting bundled depth. Best fit for mid-market companies wanting OKR + performance + 1-on-1s bundled without buying separate Lattice/Quantive subscriptions. Trade-offs: feature depth below specialists in each dimension (no single dimension is best-in-class), UX dense (comprehensive features create complexity), and brand recognition lower than category leaders.
Mid-market companies (100-2,000 employees) wanting OKR + performance reviews + 1-on-1s bundled in one platform.
OKR-only buyers (Quantive better depth), enterprise needing best-in-class (separate Lattice + Quantive better), or bundled-with-existing-tool seekers.
Strengths
- Combined OKR + performance + 1-on-1s
- Reduces tool sprawl
- Mature OKR workflow
- Comprehensive performance features
- Transparent pricing
- Strong fit for mid-market wanting depth bundled
Weaknesses
- Feature depth below specialists
- UX dense with comprehensive features
- Brand recognition lower
- AI features below Quantive
- No best-in-class dimension
- Learning curve steeper
Pricing tiers
public- LaunchFree for up to 5 users$0 /mo
- GrowthPer-user/month; OKR + performance$7+$7 /mo +/emp
- Enterprise$15K-$60K/yearQuote
- · Per-seat scaling
- · Annual price increases of 5-8%
- · AI features at higher tiers
Key features
- +OKR cycle workflow
- +Performance reviews
- +1-on-1 meetings
- +Employee engagement
- +Task management
- +Alignment visualization
- +API access
- +60+ integrations
Lattice OKRs
Lattice performance suite OKR module, default for Lattice customers.
Lattice OKRs is the OKR module within Lattice, the performance management platform, founded 2015. Lattice last valued $3B (2022 Series F). Distinct from the dedicated Lattice performance product in our performance management ranking, this module focuses specifically on OKRs. Strengths: tight Lattice performance integration (OKR check-ins feed performance reviews), bundled with Lattice subscription (no separate purchase), modern UX inherited from Lattice, and growing OKR depth. Best fit for Lattice customers wanting OKRs bundled with performance management. Trade-offs: OKR depth below pure-play Quantive (Lattice prioritizes performance management over OKR depth), Lattice dependency creates lock-in, OKR module is not flagship product, and feature velocity follows Lattice product priorities rather than OKR-specific roadmap.
Lattice performance management customers (50-2,000 employees) wanting OKRs bundled with performance reviews and 1-on-1 workflow.
Non-Lattice customers (Quantive standalone better), OKR-only depth (Quantive better), or buyers wanting pure-play OKR-first design.
Strengths
- Tight Lattice performance integration
- Bundled with Lattice subscription
- Modern UX inherited from Lattice
- Strong fit for Lattice customers
- OKR + performance unified workflow
- Growing OKR depth
Weaknesses
- OKR depth below pure-play Quantive
- Lattice dependency creates lock-in
- OKR module is not flagship
- Feature velocity follows Lattice priorities
- Less suited for non-Lattice customers
- Bundled-with-existing-tool limits standalone choice
Pricing tiers
opaque- Lattice Performance + OKRCombined subscription; ~$11-$20/user/monthQuote
- Lattice Enterprise$30K-$200K+/yearQuote
- · Lattice subscription required
- · Per-seat scaling
- · Annual price increases of 5-8%
Key features
- +OKR cycle workflow
- +Lattice performance integration
- +Check-ins for OKR
- +Alignment visualization
- +Reporting
- +1-on-1 meetings
- +API access
- +60+ integrations
Mooncamp
European modern OKR platform with GDPR-first posture.
Mooncamp is the European modern OKR platform, founded 2018 in Cologne. Privately-held. The platform centers on OKR workflow + alignment + modern UX with GDPR-first posture. Strengths: GDPR-first design (data residency in EU), modern German engineering culture, transparent pricing, strong fit for European mid-market, and mature OKR cycle workflow. Best fit for European tech-forward mid-market wanting GDPR-native OKRs. Trade-offs: smaller installed base than Quantive, US presence limited, brand recognition lower outside EU, AI features lighter than Quantive, and feature breadth narrower at enterprise scale.
European tech-forward mid-market (50-1,000 employees) wanting GDPR-native OKR platform with modern UX and EU data residency.
US enterprise (Quantive better presence), buyers needing strategy-execution depth (Quantive better), or bundled-OKR seekers.
Strengths
- GDPR-first design with EU data residency
- Modern German engineering culture
- Transparent pricing
- Strong fit for European mid-market
- Mature OKR cycle workflow
- Clean modern UX
Weaknesses
- Smaller installed base than Quantive
- US presence limited
- Brand recognition lower outside EU
- AI features lighter than Quantive
- Feature breadth narrower at enterprise
- Less suited for US enterprise
Pricing tiers
public- EssentialsPer-user/month; basic OKRs$8+$8 /mo +/emp
- StandardPer-user/month; full features$12+$12 /mo +/emp
- Enterprise$15K-$60K/year for enterpriseQuote
- · Per-seat scaling
- · Annual price increases of 5-8%
Key features
- +OKR cycle workflow
- +Alignment visualization
- +Cadence + check-ins
- +GDPR-first data residency
- +API access
- +Reporting
- +Templates
- +50+ integrations
Microsoft Viva Goals
Bundled with Microsoft 365 E5, default for Microsoft customers.
Microsoft Viva Goals is the OKR module within Microsoft Viva, the employee experience platform, founded as Ally.io in 2018 and acquired by Microsoft in October 2021. Bundled with Microsoft 365 E5 or as standalone Viva Goals subscription. Strengths: tight Microsoft 365 integration (Teams, Outlook, Power BI), bundled with E5 (no separate purchase for E5 customers), public-co stability, mature alignment visualization inherited from Ally.io. Best fit for Microsoft 365 E5 customers wanting OKR module bundled with broader Viva employee experience. Trade-offs: OKR depth below pure-play Quantive, Microsoft dependency creates lock-in, requires E5 tier for full Viva features, AI features follow Microsoft Copilot priorities, and Ally.io integration consumed by Microsoft has slowed standalone product velocity.
Microsoft 365 E5 customers (200-10,000 employees) wanting OKR module bundled with broader Viva employee experience platform.
Non-Microsoft customers (Quantive standalone better), Microsoft 365 Business/E3 customers (Viva Goals requires E5 or standalone), or OKR depth seekers.
Strengths
- Tight Microsoft 365 integration
- Bundled with E5
- Public-co stability
- Mature alignment visualization
- Power BI reporting integration
- Strong fit for Microsoft-anchored orgs
Weaknesses
- OKR depth below Quantive
- Microsoft dependency creates lock-in
- Requires E5 for full features
- Ally.io velocity slowed post-Microsoft
- AI follows Copilot priorities not OKR-specific
- Standalone Viva Goals less compelling without E5
Pricing tiers
public- Microsoft 365 E5 (bundled)Includes Viva Goals + full E5 features$57+$57 /mo +/emp
- Viva Goals standalonePer-user/month standalone$6+$6 /mo +/emp
- Viva Suite standaloneIncludes Goals + Insights + Engage + Learning$12+$12 /mo +/emp
- · E5 license required for full bundle
- · Per-seat scaling
- · Annual price increases of 5-8%
Key features
- +OKR cycle workflow
- +Microsoft 365 integration
- +Teams integration
- +Power BI reporting
- +Alignment visualization
- +Cadence + check-ins
- +API access (Microsoft Graph)
- +300+ integrations
Asana Goals
OKR module native to Asana project platform.
Asana Goals is the OKR module native to Asana, the project management platform, founded 2008. Public NYSE:ASAN since 2020. Distinct from the dedicated Asana project management product in our project management ranking, this module focuses specifically on OKRs anchored to Asana project execution. Strengths: tight Asana project integration (OKRs anchored to projects + tasks), bundled with Asana subscription (no separate purchase), modern UX inherited from Asana, and strong fit for Asana customers wanting OKR + project unified. Best fit for Asana customers wanting OKRs anchored to project execution. Trade-offs: OKR depth below pure-play Quantive (Asana prioritizes project management over OKR depth), Asana dependency creates lock-in, requires Asana Enterprise tier for full Goals features, and feature velocity follows Asana priorities rather than OKR-specific roadmap.
Asana customers (50-2,000 employees) wanting OKRs anchored to project execution with task-level traceability.
Non-Asana customers (Quantive standalone better), OKR-only depth (Quantive better), or buyers wanting pure-play OKR-first design.
Strengths
- Tight Asana project integration
- Bundled with Asana subscription
- Modern UX inherited from Asana
- Strong fit for Asana customers
- OKR + project unified workflow
- Public-co stability
Weaknesses
- OKR depth below pure-play Quantive
- Asana dependency creates lock-in
- Requires Asana Enterprise tier for full features
- Feature velocity follows Asana priorities
- OKR module is not flagship
- Less suited for non-Asana customers
Pricing tiers
public- Asana BusinessPer-user/month; basic Goals$25+$25 /mo +/emp
- Asana EnterpriseFull Goals features; $30-50/user/monthQuote
- Asana Enterprise+Custom pricingQuote
- · Per-seat scaling
- · Annual pricing only at higher tiers
- · Annual price increases of 5-8%
Key features
- +OKR cycle workflow (Goals)
- +Asana project integration
- +Task-level traceability
- +Alignment visualization
- +Reporting
- +Cadence + check-ins
- +API access
- +270+ integrations
Weekdone
Simple OKR plus weekly check-ins for SMB teams.
Weekdone is the simple OKR + weekly check-ins platform, founded 2013 in Tartu. Privately-held, profitable per public statements. The platform centers on lightweight OKR cycle workflow + weekly PPP (Plans, Progress, Problems) check-ins. Strengths: simple OKR cycle workflow, mature weekly check-in ritual, Estonian engineering culture, transparent affordable pricing, profitable execution since 2018. Best fit for SMB teams wanting lightweight OKR cadence without enterprise feature breadth. Trade-offs: feature depth below Quantive, AI features lighter, smaller installed base, less suited for strategy-execution depth, and brand recognition lower.
SMB teams (10-200 employees) wanting lightweight OKR + weekly check-in rhythm without enterprise feature breadth.
Enterprise OKR programs (Quantive better), strategy-execution depth (Quantive/Perdoo better), or bundled-OKR seekers.
Strengths
- Simple OKR cycle workflow
- Mature weekly PPP check-ins
- Estonian engineering culture
- Transparent affordable pricing
- Profitable execution since 2018
- Strong fit for SMB lightweight cadence
Weaknesses
- Feature depth below Quantive
- AI features lighter
- Smaller installed base
- Less suited for strategy execution depth
- Brand recognition lower
- UX dated relative to Mooncamp
Pricing tiers
public- FreeUp to 3 users; full features$0 /mo
- StandardPer-user/month$6+$6 /mo +/emp
- Pro$5K-$24K/year for enterpriseQuote
- · Per-seat scaling
- · Annual price increases of 5-8%
Key features
- +OKR cycle workflow
- +Weekly PPP check-ins
- +Quarterly reviews
- +Alignment visualization
- +Reporting dashboards
- +Templates
- +API access
- +30+ integrations
Perdoo
Long-running OKR with strategy maps and KPI tracking.
Perdoo is the long-running OKR platform with strategy maps, founded 2014 in Amsterdam. Privately-held. The platform differentiates with strategy maps (visualizing the relationship between objectives, KRs, and KPIs) and dual KPI + KR tracking. Strengths: strategy maps for execution visualization, mature OKR workflow since 2014, dual KPI + KR tracking, strong fit for orgs wanting strategy-execution depth without Quantive pricing, Amsterdam engineering culture. Best fit for mid-market wanting strategy-execution visualization beyond simple OKR tracking. Trade-offs: AI features below Quantive, smaller installed base, brand recognition lower than category leaders, and feature breadth narrower at enterprise.
Mid-market companies (50-1,000 employees) wanting strategy-execution depth + KPI + OKR combined visualization without Quantive pricing.
Simple OKR-only needs (Weekdone better), enterprise depth (Quantive better), or bundled-OKR seekers.
Strengths
- Strategy maps for execution visualization
- Mature OKR workflow since 2014
- Dual KPI + KR tracking
- Strong fit for strategy-execution depth
- Amsterdam engineering culture
- Transparent pricing
Weaknesses
- AI features below Quantive
- Smaller installed base
- Brand recognition lower
- Feature breadth narrower at enterprise
- UX feels older than Mooncamp
- Less suited for bundled-OKR seekers
Pricing tiers
public- PremiumPer-user/month$9+$9 /mo +/emp
- Supreme$12K-$48K/year for enterpriseQuote
- · Per-seat scaling
- · Annual price increases of 5-8%
Key features
- +OKR cycle workflow
- +Strategy maps
- +KPI tracking
- +Alignment visualization
- +Cadence + check-ins
- +Reporting
- +API access
- +40+ integrations
Workpath
Enterprise OKR for European mid-market with SAP partnership.
Workpath is the enterprise OKR platform for European mid-market, founded 2016 in Frankfurt. Privately-held. The platform centers on enterprise-grade OKR + strategy execution with SAP technology partner relationship. Strengths: enterprise-grade OKR depth, SAP partnership (mature SAP integration), strong fit for German + EU enterprises, GDPR-first design, and consultative implementation services. Best fit for European enterprises ($500M+ revenue) wanting enterprise OKR with SAP integration. Trade-offs: pricing meaningful + opaque enterprise tiers, US presence limited, brand recognition lower outside EU, AI features below Quantive on velocity, and implementation services dependency.
European enterprises ($500M+ revenue, 1,000+ employees) wanting enterprise OKR with SAP integration and consultative implementation.
US-only enterprises (Quantive better US presence), SMB (Weekdone simpler), or buyers wanting self-service onboarding.
Strengths
- Enterprise-grade OKR depth
- SAP technology partnership
- Strong fit for German + EU enterprises
- GDPR-first design
- Consultative implementation services
- Frankfurt + Berlin engineering
Weaknesses
- Pricing meaningful + opaque
- US presence limited
- Brand recognition lower outside EU
- AI features below Quantive
- Implementation services dependency
- Less suited for SMB
Pricing tiers
opaque- Workpath Pro~$30K-$80K/year for mid-enterpriseQuote
- Workpath Enterprise$80K-$300K+/year for global enterprisesQuote
- · Per-seat scaling
- · Implementation services ($25K-$200K)
- · Annual price increases of 6-10%
Key features
- +Enterprise OKR cycle
- +SAP integration
- +Strategy execution
- +Alignment + cascading
- +Reporting dashboards
- +Consultative services
- +API access
- +40+ integrations
OKRify
Indian-built affordable OKR for SMB and South Asian mid-market.
OKRify is the Indian-built affordable OKR platform, founded 2019 in Bangalore. Privately-held. The platform centers on affordable OKR + 1-on-1s + check-ins for Indian and South Asian mid-market with INR-native pricing. Strengths: INR-native pricing, mature OKR cycle workflow, Indian engineering culture, strong fit for Indian mid-market, and competitive feature set at SMB pricing. Best fit for Indian + South Asian mid-market wanting OKR at INR-native pricing. Trade-offs: brand recognition limited outside India, smaller installed base globally, feature breadth narrower at enterprise, and less suited for global enterprises with multi-currency complexity.
Indian + South Asian mid-market companies (50-500 employees) wanting OKR + 1-on-1s + check-ins at INR-native pricing.
US/EU enterprises (Quantive/Workpath better), global multi-entity OKR programs, or buyers needing Western brand recognition.
Strengths
- INR-native pricing
- Mature OKR cycle workflow
- Indian engineering culture
- Strong fit for Indian mid-market
- Competitive feature set at SMB pricing
- Affordable for emerging markets
Weaknesses
- Brand recognition limited outside India
- Smaller installed base globally
- Feature breadth narrower at enterprise
- Less suited for global multi-currency
- AI features below Quantive
- Limited Western customer references
Pricing tiers
public- FreeUp to 5 users$0 /mo
- ProPer-user/month (~₹240)$3+$3 /mo +/emp
- EnterpriseCustom INR pricing for enterpriseQuote
- · Per-seat scaling
- · Annual price increases of 5-8%
Key features
- +OKR cycle workflow
- +1-on-1 meetings
- +Weekly check-ins
- +Alignment visualization
- +Performance reviews
- +Templates
- +API access
- +30+ integrations
Frequently asked questions
The questions buyers actually ask before they sign.
Does UK post-Brexit GDPR affect which OKR tool I should choose?
Is Mooncamp a credible alternative to Quantive for UK mid-market?
Should I buy a standalone OKR tool or use a bundled module?
Why is Quantive (Gtmhub) the pure-play category leader?
What happened with Ally.io after Microsoft acquired it?
How do OKRs differ from KPIs and how does Perdoo handle the distinction?
Are OKRs being absorbed by performance management software?
How do I evaluate vendor stability for an OKR tool?
When should I NOT implement OKRs?
Can I use Notion or Linear for OKRs instead of dedicated software?
Final word
Looking at a different market? See the global OKR Software ranking, or pick another country at the top of this page.
Last updated 2026-05-18. Local pricing reverified quarterly. Found something inaccurate? Tell us.