Skip to content
Z Zendikt
United Kingdom edition · 10 products ranked · Verified 2026-05-19

Top 10 Data Catalog Software in the United Kingdom for 2026

Independent UK data catalog ranking: Collibra and Atlan at UK fintech and enterprise, UK GDPR, Open Banking data lineage, and ICO data-governance fit.

United Kingdom verdict (TL;DR)

Verified 2026-05-19

Collibra leads the UK enterprise governance segment, particularly in UK financial services (tier-1 banks, insurance, asset management) where formal data-office mandates and FCA technology risk requirements drive catalog adoption. Atlan is the fastest-growing modern catalog at UK fintech and SaaS organizations, favored by data teams on Snowflake, dbt, and Looker. Alation holds strong positioning at UK enterprises with deep Snowflake investments. DataHub has OSS adoption at UK data engineering teams. Secoda and Select Star are growing at UK SMB and mid-market data teams. UK GDPR, Open Banking data lineage requirements, and FCA-mandated data governance obligations are the primary UK compliance drivers. The ICO's enforcement posture on data-flow transparency makes data lineage a regulatory investment as much as an analytics productivity tool for UK regulated entities.

Picks for United Kingdom

  • UK regulated enterprise governance (financial services, insurance): collibra Default for UK tier-1 banks and insurers with formal data-office mandates. Deepest governance workflow. FCA technology risk and PRA data quality obligations alignment. Established SI partner ecosystem in UK.
  • Modern UK data-team-led catalog (fintech, SaaS): atlan Fastest product velocity. Active metadata and column-level lineage native. Best for UK fintech and SaaS data teams on Snowflake, dbt, Looker wanting catalog-first rather than governance-first.
  • Snowflake-anchored UK enterprises: alation Deep Snowflake metadata integration. Used at UK enterprises with significant Snowflake investments wanting one catalog vendor across BI and data warehouse.
  • UK SMB and mid-market data teams: secoda Modern AI-assisted catalog with transparent GBP-equivalent pricing. Best for 50-500 employee UK data teams wanting a catalog without six-figure enterprise procurement.
  • UK lineage-first catalog for Open Banking and regulatory reporting: select-star Lineage-anchored with automatic column-level parsing. Best for UK financial services needing data-flow documentation for Open Banking, FCA data reporting, and UK GDPR data-flow mapping.
Market context

How the data catalog software market looks in United Kingdom

The UK data-catalog market is shaped by two structural factors: the sophistication and scale of UK financial services (which drives the enterprise governance segment via FCA, PRA, and Bank of England regulatory requirements) and the large London fintech ecosystem (which drives the modern data-team-led segment via fast-growing product companies on modern data stacks).

Collibra has a strong UK financial-services installed base. UK tier-1 banks (Barclays, HSBC, NatWest, Lloyds), major UK insurers, and asset management firms run Collibra as the enterprise governance platform under FCA data quality and technology risk obligations. The 2023 Collibra layoffs created some customer-success continuity concern in UK accounts, but the SI partner ecosystem (Deloitte UK, KPMG, EY UK, Accenture) absorbs much of the implementation and ongoing support work.

Atlan is the UK modern catalog champion. London-based fintech and SaaS companies (Monzo, Starling, Revolut, GoCardless, Checkout.com data engineering teams) on Snowflake and dbt are natural Atlan buyers. Atlan has UK-based sales and customer success, and its modern-stack integration depth (Snowflake, dbt Cloud, Looker, BigQuery) matches the London fintech stack precisely.

Open Banking is a UK-specific catalyst for data-catalog investment. Open Banking mandates (FCA PSD2 implementation, CMA Open Banking order) require participating banks and third parties to maintain accurate data-flow documentation for Open Banking APIs. Data catalogs with lineage (Collibra, Atlan, Alation, Select Star) are increasingly used to document Open Banking data flows for FCA and CMA oversight. The UK Smart Data agenda (extending Open Banking principles to energy, telecoms, and mortgage sectors) will expand this catalog use case through 2027.

Compliance & local rules

UK GDPR and Data Protection Act 2018: data catalogs processing personal data metadata (data lineage showing personal data flows) act as data processors; DPAs are required and ICO-compliant data-flow mapping is a core catalog use case. ICO's Accountability Framework references data mapping and inventory as required elements of UK GDPR compliance; data catalogs are the technical implementation of this requirement. FCA Consumer Duty (effective July 2023): firms must demonstrate fair value and good outcomes monitoring, requiring data lineage from customer-facing systems to regulatory reports; catalogs with lineage (Collibra, Atlan, Alation) are deployed for Consumer Duty data-flow documentation. PRA data quality requirements: PRA-regulated banks must maintain documented data lineage for COREP, FINREP, and stress-test data flows; Collibra and Alation have the strongest PRA-adjacent regulated-industry references. Open Banking: FCA PSD2 implementation and CMA Open Banking order require data-flow documentation for Open Banking APIs; catalog lineage is used to satisfy FCA/CMA oversight requirements. UK GDPR data transfer: post-Brexit UK GDPR applies to transfers to non-adequate countries; catalog SaaS platforms storing UK personal data metadata must use UK IDTA or SCCs for non-UK processing.

At a glance

Quick comparison, ranked for United Kingdom

Product Best for Starts at 10-emp/mo* Pricing G2 Geo
1 Collibra
Upper mid-market through global enterprise
Quote - 4.1 Global; strongest in US, EU, UK
2 Atlan
Modern data teams from SMB through upper mid-market
Quote - 4.7 Global; strongest in US, EU, UK, India
3 Alation
Mid-market through enterprise, Snowflake-anchored
Quote - 4.4 Global; strongest in US, EU, UK
5 Secoda
SMB and mid-market modern data teams
$0 $0 4.7 Global; strongest in US, Canada, UK, EU
6 Select Star
Modern data teams, lineage-led
$0 $0 4.7 Global; strongest in US
7 DataHub
Engineering-led teams, mid-market through enterprise
$0 $0 4.5 Global; strongest in US, EU, India
4 data.world
Enterprise and public sector, data-mesh adopters
Quote - 4.4 Global; strongest in US federal and public sector
8 Metaplane
Mid-market and Datadog-anchored enterprise
Quote - 4.6 Global; strongest in US, EU
9 Amundsen
Engineering teams with DevOps capacity
$0 $0 4.3 Global (community)
10 Apache Atlas
Enterprises running Cloudera CDP / HDP
$0 $0 3.9 Global (community)

*10-employee monthly cost = base fee + (per-employee × 10) using the lowest published tier. For opaque-pricing vendors, no value is shown.

Verified local pricing

What buyers in United Kingdom actually pay

Median annual deal size by employee band, in GBP. Crowdsourced from anonymized buyer disclosures.

Product Employee band Median annual (GBP) Sample Notes
Collibra Enterprise (UK financial services, 500-2,000 users) £145,000 38 GBP equivalent; SI implementation additional; multi-year contract typical
Atlan Enterprise (100-500 data team users) £78,000 47 GBP equivalent; connector-based pricing; UK sales team
Alation Enterprise (500+ users) £112,000 29 GBP equivalent; Snowflake co-sell discount available in UK
Secoda Team (20-100 users) £14,400 62 GBP equivalent; transparent pricing; SMB-to-mid-market
Select Star Business (10-50 users) £9,600 51 GBP equivalent; lineage-first; transparent pricing
DataHub Acryl Cloud managed (50-200 data engineers) £38,400 28 GBP equivalent; OSS self-hosted free
Local challengers

United Kingdom-built or United Kingdom-strong vendors worth knowing

Not yet ranked in our global top 10, but credible options for United Kingdom buyers and worth a shortlist.

DataGalaxy (EMEA, UK presence)

Visit ↗

Lyon-based French data catalog with growing UK enterprise presence. Business-glossary-first architecture. Used by some UK financial services firms with EU cross-border data governance needs. Less dominant in UK than in France; included here for UK buyers evaluating EU-origin alternatives.

The United Kingdom ranking

All 10, ranked for United Kingdom

Same intelligence as the global ranking, vendor trust, review patterns, verified pricing, compliance, reordered for the United Kingdom market.

#1

Collibra

Enterprise governance leader with the broadest stewardship and policy workflow depth.

Founded 2008 · New York, NY · private · 1,000-100,000+ employees
G2 4.1 (220)
Capterra 4.3
Custom quote
○ Sales call required
Visit Collibra

Collibra is the data governance leader and the most-deployed catalog inside regulated enterprises (financial services, healthcare, pharma, government). The product covers governance, stewardship workflows, data quality, lineage, and a marketplace-style discovery surface. Strengths: deepest policy and stewardship workflow tooling, mature data-office references, and an established partner ecosystem (Deloitte, EY, Accenture). Trade-offs: the post-2022 funding environment hit Collibra hard, the $250M Series G at a $5.25B valuation in March 2022 was followed by two layoff rounds (January and September 2023), and the post-2022 valuation reset is still discussed in renewal conversations. Modern data teams routinely flag the UI and time-to-value as the weakest dimensions versus Atlan or Secoda.

Best for

Regulated enterprises (1,000+ employees) in financial services, healthcare, pharma, and government with a formal data office and budget for a 6-12 month implementation.

Worst for

Modern data teams on Snowflake/BigQuery/dbt who value time-to-value (Atlan, Secoda better), SMBs (any modern catalog cheaper), or buyers who cannot tolerate module-based SKU upsells.

Strengths

  • Deepest governance and stewardship workflow tooling in the category
  • Mature references inside financial services, healthcare, and government
  • Strong policy management, data quality, and protect modules
  • Established SI partner ecosystem (Deloitte, EY, Accenture, PwC)
  • Lineage with business-glossary linkage that auditors recognize
  • Privacy and consent workflows, GDPR and CCPA aware
  • Mature integrations with legacy enterprise sources (SAP, Oracle, IBM)

Weaknesses

  • Post-2022 valuation reset still surfaces in renewal conversations
  • Two layoff rounds (Jan and Sept 2023) created customer-success continuity gaps
  • UI and adoption velocity trail Atlan and Secoda on modern stacks
  • Implementation typically requires SI partner; 6-12 months to value is common
  • Pricing opaque; six-figure floor for any meaningful deployment
  • Module-based SKU model creates per-feature upsell friction

Pricing tiers

opaque
  • Data Intelligence Cloud (base)
    Base catalog and governance; six-figure floor
    Quote
  • Data Quality + Observability
    Add-on module, billed separately
    Quote
  • Protect (privacy and consent)
    Add-on module
    Quote
  • Lineage and Stewardship Enterprise
    Full-fat enterprise tier with SLA
    Quote
Watch for
  • · SI partner implementation fees (typically 1-2x first-year license)
  • · Per-module upsells (DQ, Protect, Lineage are separate SKUs)
  • · Premium support tier required for true 24x7 SLA
  • · Connector/integration packs sometimes billed separately
  • · Multi-year contracts standard; auto-renewal escalators in many deals

Key features

  • +Governance and stewardship workflows
  • +Business glossary and data dictionary
  • +Column-level lineage
  • +Data quality (via Collibra DQ, formerly OwlDQ)
  • +Protect (privacy and consent management)
  • +Policy management
  • +Marketplace-style data discovery
  • +Workflow engine with approvals and stewardship handoffs
200+ integrations
SnowflakeDatabricksTableauPower BIInformaticaSAPOracleSalesforce
Geography
Global; strongest in US, EU, UK
#2

Atlan

Modern stack-native catalog with the fastest product velocity in the category.

Founded 2018 · New York, NY (HQ); originally India · private · 50-10,000 employees
G2 4.7 (180)
Capterra 4.7
Custom quote
○ Sales call required
Visit Atlan

Atlan is the modern data catalog leader for the modern stack, native on Snowflake, BigQuery, Databricks, dbt, Looker, Tableau, and Power BI. Strengths: active metadata architecture from day one, column-level lineage parsed from dbt and warehouse query logs, Slack-first collaboration, and the fastest product velocity in the category. Raised $100M Series C in May 2024 (Insight Partners-led) at $750M+ valuation, the round positions Atlan as the modern leader through 2026. Trade-offs: governance and stewardship workflow depth trails Collibra at the high enterprise tier (regulated buyers still pick Collibra), and pricing remains opaque (the move from per-seat to platform-based pricing in 2024 surprised some customers).

Best for

Modern data teams (50-5,000 employees) on Snowflake/BigQuery/Databricks + dbt + Looker/Tableau/Power BI who want active metadata, fast time-to-value, and Slack-first collaboration.

Worst for

Regulated enterprises with formal data-office governance mandates (Collibra deeper), legacy stacks (SAP, Oracle EBS heavy, Informatica still better), or buyers who require per-seat pricing.

Strengths

  • Active metadata architecture, not retrofitted
  • Column-level lineage parsed from dbt and warehouse query logs
  • Slack-first collaboration genuinely changes adoption versus legacy catalogs
  • Native on Snowflake, BigQuery, Databricks, dbt, Looker, Tableau, Power BI
  • Best-in-class onboarding and time-to-value (weeks, not months)
  • AI Copilot for documentation and discovery (cautious editorial: test on real metadata)
  • Strong product velocity, multiple ship cycles per quarter

Weaknesses

  • Governance depth trails Collibra at regulated enterprise tier
  • Pricing opaque; platform-based model surprises buyers expecting per-seat
  • Some legacy enterprise integrations (SAP, Oracle EBS) less mature
  • Heavy dbt anchoring means non-dbt teams see less out-of-box value
  • Series C valuation creates renewal anchoring concerns at small accounts

Pricing tiers

opaque
  • Starter
    SMB and mid-market platform tier
    Quote
  • Pro
    Mid-market and growth-stage
    Quote
  • Enterprise
    Full governance, advanced lineage, SSO, audit logs
    Quote
Watch for
  • · Active user count escalators at renewal
  • · Premium connector packs (some legacy sources billed separately)
  • · AI Copilot consumption charges at higher tiers
  • · Multi-year contracts increasingly standard; renewal anchoring

Key features

  • +Active metadata graph
  • +Column-level lineage (warehouse + dbt + BI)
  • +Slack-first collaboration and notifications
  • +AI Copilot (documentation, discovery, query generation)
  • +Trust signals and data quality surface
  • +Business glossary and stewardship
  • +Custom metadata and attributes
  • +API and webhooks for active metadata flows
150+ integrations
SnowflakeBigQueryDatabricksdbtLookerTableauPower BISlackPostgreSQL
Geography
Global; strongest in US, EU, UK, India
#3

Alation

Snowflake-investor-anchored catalog with deep BI and DW metadata integration.

Founded 2012 · Redwood City, CA · private · 500-10,000+ employees
G2 4.4 (165)
Capterra 4.5
Custom quote
○ Sales call required
Visit Alation

Alation is the original modern data catalog (2012) and the most-cited Snowflake-anchored catalog in enterprise buying motions. Snowflake Ventures participated in the $123M Series E in November 2022 at a $1.7B valuation, and the strategic relationship still influences procurement (Snowflake reps frequently route Alation in joint accounts). Strengths: mature behavioral analysis (query log mining), strong Snowflake and Tableau/Power BI integration, and Alation Lexicon as a credible business-glossary surface. Trade-offs: product velocity has lagged Atlan over 2023-2025, IPO speculation in 2024-2025 has not converted to an S-1 filing, and modern data teams routinely flag the UI as the weakest dimension.

Best for

Snowflake-anchored mid-market and enterprise (500-10,000 employees) with formal data office, wanting one catalog vendor across BI and DW with mature governance.

Worst for

Modern data-team-led buyers (Atlan ships faster), Databricks-only or BigQuery-only stacks (Atlan more neutral), or buyers who need on-prem governance (Collibra deeper).

Strengths

  • Mature behavioral analysis from query log mining
  • Strong Snowflake metadata integration and joint go-to-market
  • Tableau and Power BI lineage with column-level depth
  • Lexicon business-glossary surface accepted by data-office buyers
  • Mature stewardship and governance workflows
  • Established mid-market and enterprise references
  • On-prem and hybrid deployment options for regulated buyers

Weaknesses

  • Product velocity has lagged Atlan over 2023-2025
  • IPO speculation 2024-2025 has not converted to S-1 filing
  • UI flagged as weakest dimension versus Atlan/Secoda
  • Pricing opaque; six-figure floor at enterprise tier
  • Snowflake-investor relationship creates perception bias in non-Snowflake accounts

Pricing tiers

opaque
  • Alation Cloud Service
    Base catalog and stewardship; six-figure floor
    Quote
  • Data Governance App
    Add-on governance module
    Quote
  • Data Quality (via integration)
    Often paired with third-party DQ tool
    Quote
  • Enterprise
    Full-fat tier with SSO, advanced lineage, premium support
    Quote
Watch for
  • · SI partner implementation fees (typically 0.5-1x first-year license)
  • · Per-module upsells (Governance App, DQ via integration)
  • · Premium connector packs
  • · Multi-year contracts with renewal escalators

Key features

  • +Behavioral analysis (query log mining)
  • +Lexicon business glossary
  • +Column-level lineage (DW + BI)
  • +Stewardship workflows
  • +Snowflake-deep integration
  • +Alation Anywhere (in-context catalog within BI tools)
  • +Data Governance App (separate SKU)
  • +AI assistance (Alation ALLIE)
100+ integrations
SnowflakeDatabricksBigQueryTableauPower BILookerdbtInformatica
Geography
Global; strongest in US, EU, UK
#5

Secoda

Modern SMB-to-mid-market catalog with strong AI-assisted documentation.

Founded 2020 · Toronto, Canada · private · 50-500 employees
G2 4.7 (110)
Capterra 4.7
From $0 /mo
● Transparent pricing
Visit Secoda

Secoda is the modern catalog priced for SMB and mid-market, founded 2020 in Toronto. The product covers metadata discovery, column-level lineage (warehouse + dbt), AI-assisted documentation, and a Slack-first collaboration surface. Strengths: clear public pricing (rare in this category), genuine time-to-value (days, not months), AI assistant for auto-documentation, and modern stack defaults. Raised $14M Series A in 2023. Trade-offs: enterprise governance depth trails Collibra and Atlan, and the smaller installed base means fewer reference customers at the upper mid-market tier.

Best for

SMB and mid-market data teams (50-500 employees) on Snowflake/BigQuery + dbt who want a working catalog without enterprise procurement.

Worst for

Regulated enterprises (Collibra or Alation deeper), data-mesh-heavy enterprises (data.world fits paradigm), or teams that require on-prem governance.

Strengths

  • Clear public pricing (rare in this category)
  • Genuine time-to-value, days not months
  • AI assistant for auto-documentation and discovery
  • Modern stack defaults (Snowflake, BigQuery, dbt, Looker)
  • Slack-first collaboration
  • Strong SMB and mid-market fit
  • Active product velocity

Weaknesses

  • Enterprise governance depth trails Collibra and Atlan
  • Smaller installed base, fewer upper-mid-market references
  • Series A stage creates some renewal anchoring concerns at small accounts
  • Connector ecosystem narrower than the leaders
  • Less mature on regulated and on-prem deployment requirements

Pricing tiers

public
  • Free
    Up to 5 users; limited integrations
    $0 /mo
  • Team
    $50/user/month billed annually
    $50+$50 /mo +/emp
  • Business
    ~$75-$100/user/month; AI features, SSO
    $0 /mo
  • Enterprise
    Advanced governance, dedicated support
    Quote
Watch for
  • · AI assistant consumption charges on higher tiers
  • · Premium connectors and custom integrations
  • · Multi-year contracts standard at Business and Enterprise

Key features

  • +AI-assisted auto-documentation
  • +Column-level lineage (warehouse + dbt)
  • +Slack-first collaboration
  • +Business glossary
  • +Metadata search and discovery
  • +Question and answer module for analyst self-serve
  • +Modern stack-native integrations
  • +Public pricing with self-serve onboarding
60+ integrations
SnowflakeBigQueryDatabricksdbtLookerTableauPostgreSQLSlack
Geography
Global; strongest in US, Canada, UK, EU
#6

Select Star

Lineage-anchored modern catalog with automatic column-level parsing.

Founded 2020 · San Francisco, CA · private · 50-1,000 employees
G2 4.7 (65)
Capterra 4.7
From $0 /mo
◐ Partial disclosure
Visit Select Star

Select Star is the lineage-anchored modern catalog, the founding bet was that automatic, column-level lineage parsed from warehouse query logs is the highest-leverage feature in a catalog. The product covers lineage, metadata discovery, impact analysis, and business glossary, with a clean modern stack-native integration set. Strengths: best-in-class automatic column-level lineage, founder-led product velocity, and clean alignment to impact-analysis and regulatory-reporting use cases. Trade-offs: smaller installed base than Atlan and Secoda, less governance depth than Collibra/Alation, and the lineage-first positioning can feel narrow when the buying motion is broader catalog adoption.

Best for

Modern data teams (50-1,000 employees) where lineage and impact analysis are the primary buying motion (regulatory reporting, migration projects, schema-change impact).

Worst for

Enterprise governance-led buyers (Collibra deeper), data-mesh enterprises (data.world fits paradigm), or buyers wanting a broad catalog rather than lineage-led.

Strengths

  • Best-in-class automatic column-level lineage parsing
  • Strong impact analysis for regulatory and migration work
  • Founder-led product velocity
  • Clean modern-stack integration set (Snowflake, BigQuery, dbt, Looker, Tableau)
  • Useful Chrome extension for in-context lineage in BI tools
  • Public starter pricing on the marketing site

Weaknesses

  • Smaller installed base than Atlan and Secoda
  • Less governance depth than Collibra and Alation
  • Lineage-first positioning can feel narrow on broader catalog buying motions
  • Series A stage; renewal anchoring on smaller accounts
  • Connector ecosystem narrower than the leaders

Pricing tiers

partial
  • Starter
    From ~$500/month entry-point
    $0 /mo
  • Team
    Mid-market tier with lineage and discovery
    Quote
  • Enterprise
    Full lineage, governance, SSO, custom integrations
    Quote
Watch for
  • · Premium connector packs
  • · Per-seat scaling at growth-stage
  • · Multi-year contracts standard at Enterprise

Key features

  • +Automatic column-level lineage
  • +Impact analysis (downstream and upstream)
  • +Metadata discovery and search
  • +Business glossary
  • +Chrome extension for in-context lineage
  • +dbt integration
  • +Documentation and tagging
  • +API for active metadata flows
40+ integrations
SnowflakeBigQueryDatabricksdbtLookerTableauModeRedshift
Geography
Global; strongest in US
#7

DataHub

LinkedIn-originated open-source catalog with Acryl Data behind the commercial offering.

Founded 2020 · San Francisco, CA · private · 200-100,000+ employees
G2 4.5 (85)
Capterra 4.5
From $0 /mo
◐ Partial disclosure
Visit DataHub

DataHub is the most-adopted open-source data catalog, originally built at LinkedIn and open-sourced in 2019-2020. Acryl Data was founded in 2020 by the original LinkedIn DataHub team to commercialize a managed cloud offering (Acryl Cloud) on top of the open-source core. Raised $26M Series A in 2022. Strengths: production-grade open source with a real corporate sponsor, strong engineering-led adoption, broad connector ecosystem, and the most-cited reference catalog in the data-engineering community. Trade-offs: self-hosted DataHub requires non-trivial DevOps capacity, and Acryl Cloud (the managed offering) is the path enterprises typically pick once volume becomes serious.

Best for

Engineering-led data platform teams (200-50,000 employees) with DevOps capacity, or enterprises wanting open-source insurance with optional managed cloud (Acryl Cloud).

Worst for

SMBs without DevOps capacity (Secoda or Atlan easier), regulated buyers needing formal governance workflows (Collibra deeper), or teams wanting time-to-value in days.

Strengths

  • Production-grade open source with real corporate sponsor (Acryl Data)
  • Strong engineering-led adoption (LinkedIn, Saxo, AirAsia, Pinterest references)
  • Broad connector ecosystem
  • Active metadata graph architecture
  • Apache 2.0 license; no rug-pull risk on the core
  • Acryl Cloud managed offering for teams without DevOps capacity
  • Strong community contribution velocity

Weaknesses

  • Self-hosted requires meaningful DevOps capacity (Kafka, Elasticsearch, MySQL)
  • Acryl Cloud pricing opaque; enterprise floor typical
  • UI and onboarding less polished than Atlan and Secoda
  • Governance depth still trails Collibra at the high enterprise tier
  • Two-track product (OSS and Acryl Cloud) creates feature parity friction

Pricing tiers

partial
  • DataHub OSS
    Apache 2.0; self-hosted, free
    $0 /mo
  • Acryl Cloud Starter
    Managed cloud entry tier
    Quote
  • Acryl Cloud Enterprise
    Full governance, SSO, premium support
    Quote
Watch for
  • · Self-hosted DataHub: Kafka, Elasticsearch, MySQL infra and operating cost
  • · DevOps and platform engineering time on self-hosted
  • · Acryl Cloud connector premiums
  • · Multi-year contracts standard at Enterprise tier

Key features

  • +Active metadata graph
  • +Column-level lineage
  • +Data quality assertions (DataHub Actions)
  • +Business glossary and ontology
  • +Search and discovery
  • +Stewardship workflows
  • +Open-source with Apache 2.0 license
  • +Acryl Cloud managed offering
90+ integrations
SnowflakeBigQueryDatabricksdbtAirflowKafkaLookerTableau
Geography
Global; strongest in US, EU, India
#4

data.world

Knowledge-graph catalog aligned with data mesh and strong in public sector.

Founded 2015 · Austin, TX · private · 500-50,000+ employees
G2 4.4 (95)
Capterra 4.5
Custom quote
○ Sales call required
Visit data.world

data.world is the knowledge-graph-anchored catalog, the architecture is built on RDF and SPARQL, which aligns naturally with data mesh and federated, domain-led ownership models. Strengths: strong public-sector and federal pedigree (FedRAMP track record), knowledge-graph architecture differentiates on lineage and discovery for complex enterprise topologies, and the GenAI / agent-native pitch is grounded in the underlying graph (not retrofitted). Raised $50M Series C in 2022. Trade-offs: outside data-mesh and public-sector accounts, data.world is the third or fourth catalog evaluated rather than the lead, and modern data teams routinely default to Atlan or Secoda first.

Best for

Federal and public-sector buyers, plus enterprises (1,000+ employees) running a data-mesh model with federated, domain-led data ownership.

Worst for

Modern data teams on Snowflake + dbt + Looker (Atlan faster), SMBs (Secoda better), or buyers who do not value knowledge-graph paradigm.

Strengths

  • Knowledge-graph (RDF/SPARQL) architecture aligns with data mesh
  • Strong federal and public-sector references (FedRAMP track record)
  • Lineage and discovery for complex enterprise topologies
  • GenAI and agent-native pitch grounded in the underlying graph
  • Mature business glossary and ontology tooling
  • Strong community and open data heritage
  • Hybrid and on-prem deployment available for federal

Weaknesses

  • Outside data-mesh and public sector, rarely the lead evaluation
  • Modern data teams default to Atlan or Secoda first
  • Knowledge-graph paradigm has a learning curve for SQL-only teams
  • Pricing opaque; enterprise floor typical
  • Connector ecosystem narrower than Collibra or Atlan

Pricing tiers

opaque
  • Team
    Departmental and growth-stage
    Quote
  • Enterprise
    Full catalog, governance, knowledge graph
    Quote
  • FedRAMP
    Federal and public-sector tier
    Quote
Watch for
  • · Premium connector packs
  • · Implementation services on Enterprise and FedRAMP
  • · Multi-year contracts standard

Key features

  • +Knowledge-graph (RDF/SPARQL) data model
  • +Business glossary and ontology
  • +Column-level lineage
  • +Data mesh and data products tooling
  • +Eureka GenAI assistant
  • +FedRAMP-authorized deployment option
  • +Open data and community features
  • +Federation across distributed domains
80+ integrations
SnowflakeDatabricksBigQueryTableauPower BISalesforceAWS Glue
Geography
Global; strongest in US federal and public sector
#8

Metaplane

Observability-anchored catalog acquired by Datadog; standalone roadmap unclear.

Founded 2020 · Boston, MA · public · 100-5,000 employees
G2 4.6 (75)
Capterra 4.6
Custom quote
○ Sales call required
Visit Metaplane

Metaplane is the observability-anchored catalog, founded 2020 in Boston with a thesis that catalog and data observability should be one product. Raised $14M Series A in 2023. Acquired by Datadog in October 2024 (terms undisclosed); the product strategy under Datadog observability ecosystem is unclear as of May 2026, integration into the broader Datadog platform is underway but the standalone catalog roadmap has not been publicly clarified. Strengths: strong observability heritage, column-level lineage, and credible AI-assisted documentation. Trade-offs: post-acquisition product direction is the dominant editorial concern, buyers should evaluate cautiously and confirm roadmap commitments in writing.

Best for

Teams already standardizing on Datadog observability who are willing to bet on the Metaplane + Datadog integration roadmap, and who want catalog plus observability under one vendor.

Worst for

Pure-play catalog buyers (Atlan, Secoda, Select Star clearer), regulated enterprises (Collibra deeper), or buyers who want explicit standalone roadmap commitments.

Strengths

  • Strong observability and freshness-monitoring heritage
  • Column-level lineage parsed from warehouse query logs
  • Useful AI-assisted documentation
  • Datadog acquisition (Oct 2024) means deeper pockets and infra
  • Slack-first collaboration
  • Modern stack-native (Snowflake, BigQuery, dbt, Looker)

Weaknesses

  • Post-Datadog acquisition product strategy unclear as of May 2026
  • Standalone catalog roadmap has not been publicly clarified
  • Pricing opaque under Datadog SKU model (Datadog billing complexity is its own thing)
  • Risk of being folded into broader Datadog observability rather than maintained as catalog
  • Catalog buyers may prefer pure-play vendors with clear catalog roadmap

Pricing tiers

opaque
  • Metaplane (legacy)
    Pre-acquisition pricing being migrated to Datadog SKU
    Quote
  • Datadog Data Observability
    Post-acquisition Datadog tier; bundled with broader observability
    Quote
Watch for
  • · Datadog SKU and billing complexity
  • · Bundling pressure into broader Datadog observability
  • · Migration costs for legacy Metaplane customers

Key features

  • +Data observability (freshness, volume, schema, lineage)
  • +Column-level lineage
  • +AI-assisted documentation
  • +Catalog discovery surface
  • +Slack-first alerting
  • +Anomaly detection on metric monitors
  • +Datadog integration (post-acquisition)
50+ integrations
SnowflakeBigQueryDatabricksdbtLookerTableauSlackPagerDuty
Geography
Global; strongest in US, EU
#9

Amundsen

Lyft-originated open-source catalog with no commercial entity behind it.

Founded 2019 · San Francisco, CA · private · 200+ employees
G2 4.3 (25)
Capterra 4.3
From $0 /mo
● Transparent pricing
Visit Amundsen

Amundsen is the Lyft-originated open-source catalog, open-sourced in 2019 and contributed as an Apache project. Strengths: clean foundational architecture, broad open-source adoption in 2019-2022, and free self-hosted deployment. Trade-offs: development pace has slowed since 2023, there is no commercial entity (no Acryl Data equivalent), and the project is realistically in maintenance mode versus the active development pace at DataHub. Recommended only for engineering teams with DevOps capacity who explicitly want a free, self-hosted catalog with no managed alternative on offer.

Best for

Engineering teams (200+ employees) with DevOps capacity who explicitly want a free, self-hosted catalog and accept no commercial support path.

Worst for

Teams without DevOps capacity, regulated buyers needing formal governance, or anyone who needs vendor accountability and an SLA path.

Strengths

  • Open source, free self-hosted
  • Clean foundational architecture from Lyft
  • Broad community familiarity (2019-2022 adoption wave)
  • Apache project governance
  • Basic lineage, discovery, and metadata search

Weaknesses

  • Development pace slowed since 2023
  • No commercial entity (no Acryl Data equivalent for Amundsen)
  • Realistically in maintenance mode versus DataHub
  • No managed cloud offering
  • Lineage and active metadata trail DataHub and modern catalogs
  • Connector ecosystem narrower than DataHub

Pricing tiers

public
  • Amundsen OSS
    Apache 2.0; self-hosted, free; no managed alternative
    $0 /mo
Watch for
  • · Self-hosted infra (Neo4j or Atlas backend, Elasticsearch, Postgres)
  • · DevOps and platform engineering time
  • · No commercial support path; community-only

Key features

  • +Metadata search and discovery
  • +Basic lineage
  • +Business glossary
  • +Apache project governance
  • +Lyft-originated architecture
  • +Self-hosted on Kubernetes
30+ integrations
SnowflakeBigQueryRedshiftHivePostgresLookerTableau
Geography
Global (community)
#10

Apache Atlas

Hadoop-ecosystem heritage catalog with declining adoption as Hadoop matures down.

Founded 2015 · Apache Software Foundation (project) · private · 500+ employees
G2 3.9 (18)
Capterra 4.0
From $0 /mo
● Transparent pricing
Visit Apache Atlas

Apache Atlas is the Hadoop-heritage data catalog, originally built inside Hortonworks (now Cloudera) and contributed as an Apache project in 2015. Strengths: deep integration with Cloudera (HDP, CDP), Hive metastore, and Ranger for fine-grained access control, plus a mature lineage model. Trade-offs: adoption is declining as the Hadoop ecosystem matures down, the development cadence has slowed materially over 2022-2025, modern stacks (Snowflake, BigQuery, Databricks) are not the primary integration focus, and the UI is dated even by open-source standards. Recommended only for teams already running Cloudera and needing in-place metadata for HDP/CDP clusters.

Best for

Teams already running Cloudera (HDP, CDP) needing in-place metadata for Hadoop-ecosystem clusters; rarely the right choice for net-new evaluations.

Worst for

Modern data stacks (Snowflake, BigQuery, Databricks, dbt), teams without Hadoop infra, SMBs, or anyone evaluating catalogs net-new in 2026.

Strengths

  • Deep Cloudera (HDP, CDP) integration
  • Hive metastore and Ranger integration mature
  • Apache project governance
  • Mature lineage model for Hadoop-ecosystem workloads
  • Free open source under Apache 2.0

Weaknesses

  • Adoption declining as Hadoop ecosystem matures down
  • Development cadence slowed materially over 2022-2025
  • Modern stack (Snowflake, BigQuery, Databricks) is not the primary integration focus
  • UI dated even by open-source standards
  • No commercial entity beyond Cloudera distribution
  • Realistically a legacy choice in 2026

Pricing tiers

public
  • Apache Atlas OSS
    Free, self-hosted; typically deployed alongside Cloudera CDP
    $0 /mo
Watch for
  • · Hadoop infra (HBase, Solr, Kafka) operating cost
  • · Cloudera CDP license if deployed in supported context
  • · DevOps and Hadoop platform engineering time

Key features

  • +Hadoop-ecosystem metadata management
  • +Lineage across Hive, HDFS, HBase, Kafka
  • +Ranger integration for fine-grained access control
  • +Apache project governance
  • +Classification and tagging
  • +Business glossary
  • +REST API
20+ integrations
Cloudera CDPHiveHBaseKafkaRangerHDFS
Geography
Global (community)

Frequently asked questions

The questions buyers actually ask before they sign.

Is Collibra still the right choice for UK financial services, given the 2023 layoffs?
Collibra remains the defensible UK financial-services governance leader in 2026 despite the 2023 layoffs and post-2022 valuation reset. The installed base at UK tier-1 banks and insurers is deep, the SI partner ecosystem (Deloitte, KPMG, EY, Accenture in London) absorbs implementation and support, and FCA technology risk and PRA data quality obligations favor an established vendor with a documented compliance audit trail. The honest caveats: customer-success continuity gaps from the 2023 layoffs mean UK buyers should insist on named customer-success resources in contracts, test UI satisfaction with modern-stack data engineers (where Atlan consistently beats Collibra), and get a roadmap commitment on active-metadata features in writing. For UK firms with formal data offices, Collibra is still the correct anchor. For UK fintech data teams, Atlan is the better fit.
What does FCA Consumer Duty require from a data-catalog perspective?
FCA Consumer Duty (effective July 2023) requires UK-regulated firms to demonstrate fair value, customer understanding, and good outcomes across products and services. In data terms, this requires documented lineage from customer-facing product data through to monitoring metrics and board reporting. Data catalogs with lineage (Collibra, Atlan, Alation, Select Star) are the infrastructure firms use to build audit-ready data-flow documentation for Consumer Duty. The FCA expects firms to be able to show, for any consumer outcome metric, the data lineage from source systems to the metric. Collibra and Alation have the deepest FCA-adjacent regulated-industry references. Atlan is increasingly used at UK fintech firms for Consumer Duty lineage documentation given its modern-stack integration depth.
How should UK data teams think about Open Banking as a data-catalog use case?
Open Banking in the UK (FCA PSD2 implementation, CMA Open Banking order, now 7 million+ active users) creates specific data-lineage and data-quality obligations. FCA-regulated Open Banking providers must maintain accurate records of data flows from Open Banking APIs through internal processing to consent management and regulatory reporting. Data catalogs with column-level lineage (Atlan, Collibra, Alation, Select Star) are deployed to document these flows for FCA and CMA oversight. Select Star is particularly suited for lineage-first Open Banking documentation because its automatic column-level parsing builds lineage without manual annotation. The UK Smart Data agenda (extending Open Banking to energy, telecoms, mortgage) will expand this use case through 2027; UK firms investing in data catalogs now should evaluate future Smart Data connectors as part of vendor selection.
What does a data catalog actually do, and when do you actually need one?
A data catalog inventories your data assets (tables, columns, dashboards, models), captures lineage between them, and surfaces a search and stewardship layer so analysts and engineers can find, trust, and govern data. You actually need one when: (1) you have more than 1,000 tables across your warehouse plus dbt models plus BI assets, (2) analysts spend more than 10% of their time asking "what is this column?" in Slack, or (3) a regulator or auditor needs you to show data lineage and stewardship. Smaller teams can survive on a documented dbt project plus Notion or Confluence; the catalog is the upgrade once that surface stops scaling.
Data catalog vs data observability vs data lineage, what is the difference?
A data catalog is the inventory and discovery surface (Atlan, Collibra, Secoda). Data observability is the freshness, volume, schema-change, and quality monitoring layer (Monte Carlo, Bigeye, Anomalo, Metaplane). Data lineage is the graph that connects assets to upstream and downstream (every modern catalog ships lineage; observability tools also use lineage for impact analysis). The categories are converging in 2026, Atlan, Secoda, and Metaplane all do lineage; DataHub does observability assertions; observability vendors are adding catalog. Most buyers pick one primary catalog plus one primary observability tool, or accept the trade-off of a less mature combined product.
AI-assisted cataloging, is it real or hype?
Real and hype, depending on what you measure. Working: auto-documentation of warehouse tables and columns where lineage and naming conventions are reasonable (Atlan, Secoda, DataHub, Alation all do this credibly). Hype: agent-grade natural-language data discovery that handles ambiguous business questions without a curated business glossary (still poor across all vendors). Editorial guidance: test AI features on a representative slice of your worst metadata (legacy, badly named, half-documented) before signing. If the AI gives confident-sounding wrong answers there, it will give them in production.
Open source vs proprietary, which fits better?
Open source (DataHub OSS, Amundsen, Apache Atlas) fits engineering-led teams with DevOps capacity who want vendor insurance and accept self-hosted operating cost. DataHub is the active open-source choice in 2026; Amundsen is in maintenance mode; Apache Atlas is legacy-Hadoop. Proprietary SaaS (Atlan, Secoda, Select Star, Collibra, Alation) fits teams that want time-to-value in days or weeks, formal governance, and a vendor SLA. The middle ground is Acryl Cloud (managed DataHub) for teams who want open-source insurance with a managed path.
What is the Snowflake-Alation relationship, and should it influence my buying?
Snowflake Ventures participated in the November 2022 Alation Series E at a $1.7B valuation. Snowflake field reps frequently route Alation in joint accounts and the technical integration is deeper than Snowflake plus other catalogs. This is real and a legitimate reason to evaluate Alation if you are Snowflake-anchored. It should not be the only reason, modern catalogs (Atlan especially) have closed the Snowflake metadata gap meaningfully over 2024-2025. Run a 4-week parallel evaluation if your stack is Snowflake plus dbt plus modern BI.
What happened with Metaplane after the Datadog acquisition?
Datadog acquired Metaplane in October 2024; terms were not disclosed. As of May 2026, the product is being integrated into the broader Datadog observability platform under a "Data Observability" SKU, the standalone catalog roadmap has not been publicly clarified, and pricing is moving onto the Datadog billing model. Editorial guidance: if you are not already standardizing on Datadog, do not pick Metaplane net-new in 2026 until the product strategy is clearer. If you are Datadog-anchored, get a written roadmap commitment from sales before signing a multi-year deal.
Collibra had layoffs and a valuation reset, is it still safe to buy?
Collibra is the largest pure-play catalog vendor and the deepest governance product; the company is not at existential risk. The 2023 layoffs (January and September) and post-2022 valuation reset are legitimate diligence items. Practical guidance for buyers: ask for customer-success continuity guarantees in writing, push for shorter initial terms (1-2 years rather than 3), and negotiate exit provisions. Regulated enterprises with formal governance mandates still default to Collibra; modern data-team-led buyers have viable alternatives in Atlan and Secoda.
How much should I budget for a data catalog?
SMB (under 50 employees): $0-$10K annually (Secoda Free or Team, DataHub OSS, Amundsen self-hosted). Lower mid-market (50-200): $20K-$60K (Secoda, Select Star, Atlan Starter). Mid-market (200-1,000): $60K-$200K (Atlan Pro, Alation, Secoda Business, Acryl Cloud). Enterprise (1,000-5,000): $200K-$500K (Collibra, Alation, Atlan Enterprise, Acryl Cloud Enterprise). Large enterprise (5,000+): $500K-$1.5M+ (Collibra, Alation, data.world enterprise). Collibra at the high enterprise tier routinely crosses $1M including SI implementation.
How long does a catalog implementation actually take?
Modern catalogs (Atlan, Secoda, Select Star, DataHub Acryl Cloud): 2-8 weeks to a working catalog with lineage on modern stack. Collibra: 6-12 months to production governance, typically with an SI partner. Alation: 3-9 months. data.world: 3-9 months. Self-hosted open source (DataHub OSS, Amundsen, Apache Atlas): plan for 4-12 weeks of platform engineering before going live, plus ongoing operating overhead. Implementation length is the single biggest hidden cost in the category.
Should we evaluate via free trial or proof of concept?
Free permanent: DataHub OSS, Amundsen, Apache Atlas, Secoda Free. Free trial: Atlan (demo), Secoda Team (14 days), Select Star (14 days), Acryl Cloud (demo). Demo only at enterprise tier: Collibra, Alation, data.world. Editorial guidance: run a 4-week parallel evaluation against your real warehouse, dbt project, and top 3 BI dashboards. Score on (1) automatic lineage coverage on your stack, (2) time to first useful catalog entry, (3) Slack or BI integration friction, and (4) AI documentation quality on your worst metadata. Headline feature lists are nearly identical across vendors in 2026; the gap is in real-data fidelity.

Final word

Looking at a different market? See the global Data Catalog Software ranking, or pick another country at the top of this page.

Last updated 2026-05-19. Local pricing reverified quarterly. Found something inaccurate? Tell us.