Skip to content
Z Zendikt
India edition · 10 products ranked · Verified 2026-05-19

Top 10 Data Catalog Software in India for 2026

Independent India data catalog ranking: Atlan as the Indian-origin champion, Collibra at IT services, DPDP Act 2023 and RBI fintech data governance fit.

India verdict (TL;DR)

Verified 2026-05-19

Atlan is the Indian-origin data catalog champion. Founded in 2018 in New Delhi by Prukalpa Sankar and Varun Banka, now headquartered in San Francisco with strong Indian engineering roots, Atlan should rank first for Indian buyers: it is Indian-founded, data-team-led, modern-stack native, and backed at $750M+ valuation after its May 2024 Series C. Indian SaaS companies (Razorpay, Freshworks, Meesho, Dunzo-tier data teams) are natural Atlan buyers. Collibra and Alation appear at Indian IT-services majors (TCS, Infosys, Wipro) for client delivery work where US or EU clients mandate specific catalog tools. DataHub has OSS adoption at Indian data engineering teams. Secoda and Select Star are growing at Indian SMB and startup data teams. DPDP Act 2023 and RBI data governance guidelines for banks and NBFCs are the primary Indian compliance drivers reshaping data-catalog conversations. Apache Atlas has legacy Hadoop-era presence at Indian IT services.

Picks for India

  • Indian-built catalog for modern Indian data teams (any scale): atlan Indian-founded by Prukalpa Sankar and Varun Banka in New Delhi (2018). Active metadata, column-level lineage, modern stack-native. The credible Indian-origin champion; rank first for Indian buyers.
  • Client-mandated enterprise governance at Indian IT services: collibra Indian IT-services firms (TCS, Infosys, Wipro) run Collibra when US/EU enterprise clients mandate it in delivery contracts. Deepest governance workflow for regulated client environments.
  • Snowflake-anchored Indian enterprises: alation Snowflake-investor relationship and deep Snowflake metadata integration. Used at Indian enterprises and IT-services firms with Snowflake-heavy data warehousing.
  • Indian data engineering teams wanting OSS catalog: datahub LinkedIn-originated OSS. Popular with Indian data engineering teams at product companies. Self-hosted, no SaaS licensing cost, and engineering-led adoption aligns with Indian startup culture.
  • Indian SMB and startup data teams: secoda Modern AI-assisted catalog with transparent pricing. Growing at Indian 50-200 employee data teams wanting a catalog without enterprise procurement overhead.
Market context

How the data catalog software market looks in India

India's data-catalog market is shaped by a unique dynamic: the most important catalog vendor in the Indian market, Atlan, is itself an Indian-origin company. Atlan was founded in 2018 in New Delhi by Prukalpa Sankar (formerly an analytics lead at the Singaporean government data agency) and Varun Banka. Atlan is now headquartered in San Francisco but retains deep Indian engineering roots and a significant Indian customer base among modern Indian SaaS companies. The $100M Series C in May 2024 led by Insight Partners at $750M+ valuation confirms Atlan's position as the fastest-growing modern catalog globally.

Indian SaaS companies at the data-engineering maturity level that justifies a catalog (typically 50-500 employee data teams with multiple data sources) are natural Atlan buyers. Razorpay, Freshworks, Meesho, and similar Indian product companies are the target segment. The modern stack (Snowflake, BigQuery, dbt, Looker, Fivetran) at Indian SaaS aligns precisely with Atlan's integration catalog.

Indian IT-services firms present the second pattern. TCS, Infosys, Wipro, and HCL Tech run data catalog tools largely as client mandates, deploying Collibra or Alation when US and EU enterprise clients specify them in contracts. This is not an internal Indian investment decision; it follows client procurement requirements. Apache Atlas has legacy presence at Indian IT services from the Hadoop-era data platform wave (2014-2019) and is in maintenance mode.

DPDP Act 2023 is the emerging Indian regulatory driver for data-catalog adoption. Organizations handling personal data of Indian users must maintain records of processing activities and be able to respond to data-subject requests; data catalogs with automated data classification and lineage are the infrastructure layer for DPDP compliance. RBI data governance guidelines for banks and NBFCs require documented data lineage and data quality controls for regulatory reporting (capital adequacy, liquidity risk) data flows; this is driving catalog adoption at Indian private-sector banks.

Compliance & local rules

DPDP Act 2023: data catalogs that automate personal-data classification and lineage are the infrastructure for DPDP compliance; organizations must maintain records of processing, support data-subject access requests, and demonstrate data-minimization controls. Atlan and Collibra have the strongest DPDP-aligned data-classification and lineage modules. RBI data governance guidelines: RBI Master Direction on IT (2023) requires banks to maintain documented data lineage for regulatory reporting data flows; data catalogs with lineage (Atlan, Collibra, Alation) satisfy this requirement. SEBI data governance requirements: market intermediaries and exchanges with significant data processing must demonstrate data quality and lineage for regulatory reporting; Collibra and Alation have SEBI-adjacent regulated-industry references. MeitY cloud policy: government and regulated entities may require catalog tools to run on MeitY-empaneled cloud providers (AWS, Azure, GCP are empaneled); Atlan, Collibra, and Alation all support AWS Mumbai (ap-south-1) and Azure India deployments. CERT-In 2022: catalog platforms managing metadata for sensitive financial and personal data fall within CERT-In reporting scope for data breaches; incident-response procedures should include catalog metadata exposure scenarios.

At a glance

Quick comparison, ranked for India

Product Best for Starts at 10-emp/mo* Pricing G2 Geo
2 Atlan
Modern data teams from SMB through upper mid-market
Quote - 4.7 Global; strongest in US, EU, UK, India
1 Collibra
Upper mid-market through global enterprise
Quote - 4.1 Global; strongest in US, EU, UK
3 Alation
Mid-market through enterprise, Snowflake-anchored
Quote - 4.4 Global; strongest in US, EU, UK
7 DataHub
Engineering-led teams, mid-market through enterprise
$0 $0 4.5 Global; strongest in US, EU, India
5 Secoda
SMB and mid-market modern data teams
$0 $0 4.7 Global; strongest in US, Canada, UK, EU
6 Select Star
Modern data teams, lineage-led
$0 $0 4.7 Global; strongest in US
4 data.world
Enterprise and public sector, data-mesh adopters
Quote - 4.4 Global; strongest in US federal and public sector
8 Metaplane
Mid-market and Datadog-anchored enterprise
Quote - 4.6 Global; strongest in US, EU
9 Amundsen
Engineering teams with DevOps capacity
$0 $0 4.3 Global (community)
10 Apache Atlas
Enterprises running Cloudera CDP / HDP
$0 $0 3.9 Global (community)

*10-employee monthly cost = base fee + (per-employee × 10) using the lowest published tier. For opaque-pricing vendors, no value is shown.

Verified local pricing

What buyers in India actually pay

Median annual deal size by employee band, in INR. Crowdsourced from anonymized buyer disclosures.

Product Employee band Median annual (INR) Sample Notes
Atlan Growth (20-100 data team users, INR-billed) ₹4,800,000 58 INR equivalent via Indian sales team; connector-based pricing
Collibra Enterprise (IT services, client-mandated) ₹12,000,000 22 USD contract billed to Indian entity; SI implementation additional
Alation Enterprise (500+ users) ₹10,500,000 18 USD contract; INR estimate at current rate
Secoda Team (20-100 users) ₹1,500,000 34 USD-billed; INR estimate; transparent pricing
DataHub Self-hosted OSS (50-200 data engineers) ₹0 41 Open-source; infra cost only; Acryl Cloud managed adds USD license
Local challengers

India-built or India-strong vendors worth knowing

Not yet ranked in our global top 10, but credible options for India buyers and worth a shortlist.

Atlan

Visit ↗

New Delhi-founded (2018) by Prukalpa Sankar and Varun Banka. Now SF-HQ but deeply Indian-engineered. Active metadata catalog built for modern stacks (Snowflake, dbt, BigQuery). $750M+ valuation post-Series C (May 2024, Insight Partners-led). The primary Indian-origin data catalog champion. Natural first choice for Indian buyers wanting domestic-origin software.

The India ranking

All 10, ranked for India

Same intelligence as the global ranking, vendor trust, review patterns, verified pricing, compliance, reordered for the India market.

#2

Atlan

Modern stack-native catalog with the fastest product velocity in the category.

Founded 2018 · New York, NY (HQ); originally India · private · 50-10,000 employees
G2 4.7 (180)
Capterra 4.7
Custom quote
○ Sales call required
Visit Atlan

Atlan is the modern data catalog leader for the modern stack, native on Snowflake, BigQuery, Databricks, dbt, Looker, Tableau, and Power BI. Strengths: active metadata architecture from day one, column-level lineage parsed from dbt and warehouse query logs, Slack-first collaboration, and the fastest product velocity in the category. Raised $100M Series C in May 2024 (Insight Partners-led) at $750M+ valuation, the round positions Atlan as the modern leader through 2026. Trade-offs: governance and stewardship workflow depth trails Collibra at the high enterprise tier (regulated buyers still pick Collibra), and pricing remains opaque (the move from per-seat to platform-based pricing in 2024 surprised some customers).

Best for

Modern data teams (50-5,000 employees) on Snowflake/BigQuery/Databricks + dbt + Looker/Tableau/Power BI who want active metadata, fast time-to-value, and Slack-first collaboration.

Worst for

Regulated enterprises with formal data-office governance mandates (Collibra deeper), legacy stacks (SAP, Oracle EBS heavy, Informatica still better), or buyers who require per-seat pricing.

Strengths

  • Active metadata architecture, not retrofitted
  • Column-level lineage parsed from dbt and warehouse query logs
  • Slack-first collaboration genuinely changes adoption versus legacy catalogs
  • Native on Snowflake, BigQuery, Databricks, dbt, Looker, Tableau, Power BI
  • Best-in-class onboarding and time-to-value (weeks, not months)
  • AI Copilot for documentation and discovery (cautious editorial: test on real metadata)
  • Strong product velocity, multiple ship cycles per quarter

Weaknesses

  • Governance depth trails Collibra at regulated enterprise tier
  • Pricing opaque; platform-based model surprises buyers expecting per-seat
  • Some legacy enterprise integrations (SAP, Oracle EBS) less mature
  • Heavy dbt anchoring means non-dbt teams see less out-of-box value
  • Series C valuation creates renewal anchoring concerns at small accounts

Pricing tiers

opaque
  • Starter
    SMB and mid-market platform tier
    Quote
  • Pro
    Mid-market and growth-stage
    Quote
  • Enterprise
    Full governance, advanced lineage, SSO, audit logs
    Quote
Watch for
  • · Active user count escalators at renewal
  • · Premium connector packs (some legacy sources billed separately)
  • · AI Copilot consumption charges at higher tiers
  • · Multi-year contracts increasingly standard; renewal anchoring

Key features

  • +Active metadata graph
  • +Column-level lineage (warehouse + dbt + BI)
  • +Slack-first collaboration and notifications
  • +AI Copilot (documentation, discovery, query generation)
  • +Trust signals and data quality surface
  • +Business glossary and stewardship
  • +Custom metadata and attributes
  • +API and webhooks for active metadata flows
150+ integrations
SnowflakeBigQueryDatabricksdbtLookerTableauPower BISlackPostgreSQL
Geography
Global; strongest in US, EU, UK, India
#1

Collibra

Enterprise governance leader with the broadest stewardship and policy workflow depth.

Founded 2008 · New York, NY · private · 1,000-100,000+ employees
G2 4.1 (220)
Capterra 4.3
Custom quote
○ Sales call required
Visit Collibra

Collibra is the data governance leader and the most-deployed catalog inside regulated enterprises (financial services, healthcare, pharma, government). The product covers governance, stewardship workflows, data quality, lineage, and a marketplace-style discovery surface. Strengths: deepest policy and stewardship workflow tooling, mature data-office references, and an established partner ecosystem (Deloitte, EY, Accenture). Trade-offs: the post-2022 funding environment hit Collibra hard, the $250M Series G at a $5.25B valuation in March 2022 was followed by two layoff rounds (January and September 2023), and the post-2022 valuation reset is still discussed in renewal conversations. Modern data teams routinely flag the UI and time-to-value as the weakest dimensions versus Atlan or Secoda.

Best for

Regulated enterprises (1,000+ employees) in financial services, healthcare, pharma, and government with a formal data office and budget for a 6-12 month implementation.

Worst for

Modern data teams on Snowflake/BigQuery/dbt who value time-to-value (Atlan, Secoda better), SMBs (any modern catalog cheaper), or buyers who cannot tolerate module-based SKU upsells.

Strengths

  • Deepest governance and stewardship workflow tooling in the category
  • Mature references inside financial services, healthcare, and government
  • Strong policy management, data quality, and protect modules
  • Established SI partner ecosystem (Deloitte, EY, Accenture, PwC)
  • Lineage with business-glossary linkage that auditors recognize
  • Privacy and consent workflows, GDPR and CCPA aware
  • Mature integrations with legacy enterprise sources (SAP, Oracle, IBM)

Weaknesses

  • Post-2022 valuation reset still surfaces in renewal conversations
  • Two layoff rounds (Jan and Sept 2023) created customer-success continuity gaps
  • UI and adoption velocity trail Atlan and Secoda on modern stacks
  • Implementation typically requires SI partner; 6-12 months to value is common
  • Pricing opaque; six-figure floor for any meaningful deployment
  • Module-based SKU model creates per-feature upsell friction

Pricing tiers

opaque
  • Data Intelligence Cloud (base)
    Base catalog and governance; six-figure floor
    Quote
  • Data Quality + Observability
    Add-on module, billed separately
    Quote
  • Protect (privacy and consent)
    Add-on module
    Quote
  • Lineage and Stewardship Enterprise
    Full-fat enterprise tier with SLA
    Quote
Watch for
  • · SI partner implementation fees (typically 1-2x first-year license)
  • · Per-module upsells (DQ, Protect, Lineage are separate SKUs)
  • · Premium support tier required for true 24x7 SLA
  • · Connector/integration packs sometimes billed separately
  • · Multi-year contracts standard; auto-renewal escalators in many deals

Key features

  • +Governance and stewardship workflows
  • +Business glossary and data dictionary
  • +Column-level lineage
  • +Data quality (via Collibra DQ, formerly OwlDQ)
  • +Protect (privacy and consent management)
  • +Policy management
  • +Marketplace-style data discovery
  • +Workflow engine with approvals and stewardship handoffs
200+ integrations
SnowflakeDatabricksTableauPower BIInformaticaSAPOracleSalesforce
Geography
Global; strongest in US, EU, UK
#3

Alation

Snowflake-investor-anchored catalog with deep BI and DW metadata integration.

Founded 2012 · Redwood City, CA · private · 500-10,000+ employees
G2 4.4 (165)
Capterra 4.5
Custom quote
○ Sales call required
Visit Alation

Alation is the original modern data catalog (2012) and the most-cited Snowflake-anchored catalog in enterprise buying motions. Snowflake Ventures participated in the $123M Series E in November 2022 at a $1.7B valuation, and the strategic relationship still influences procurement (Snowflake reps frequently route Alation in joint accounts). Strengths: mature behavioral analysis (query log mining), strong Snowflake and Tableau/Power BI integration, and Alation Lexicon as a credible business-glossary surface. Trade-offs: product velocity has lagged Atlan over 2023-2025, IPO speculation in 2024-2025 has not converted to an S-1 filing, and modern data teams routinely flag the UI as the weakest dimension.

Best for

Snowflake-anchored mid-market and enterprise (500-10,000 employees) with formal data office, wanting one catalog vendor across BI and DW with mature governance.

Worst for

Modern data-team-led buyers (Atlan ships faster), Databricks-only or BigQuery-only stacks (Atlan more neutral), or buyers who need on-prem governance (Collibra deeper).

Strengths

  • Mature behavioral analysis from query log mining
  • Strong Snowflake metadata integration and joint go-to-market
  • Tableau and Power BI lineage with column-level depth
  • Lexicon business-glossary surface accepted by data-office buyers
  • Mature stewardship and governance workflows
  • Established mid-market and enterprise references
  • On-prem and hybrid deployment options for regulated buyers

Weaknesses

  • Product velocity has lagged Atlan over 2023-2025
  • IPO speculation 2024-2025 has not converted to S-1 filing
  • UI flagged as weakest dimension versus Atlan/Secoda
  • Pricing opaque; six-figure floor at enterprise tier
  • Snowflake-investor relationship creates perception bias in non-Snowflake accounts

Pricing tiers

opaque
  • Alation Cloud Service
    Base catalog and stewardship; six-figure floor
    Quote
  • Data Governance App
    Add-on governance module
    Quote
  • Data Quality (via integration)
    Often paired with third-party DQ tool
    Quote
  • Enterprise
    Full-fat tier with SSO, advanced lineage, premium support
    Quote
Watch for
  • · SI partner implementation fees (typically 0.5-1x first-year license)
  • · Per-module upsells (Governance App, DQ via integration)
  • · Premium connector packs
  • · Multi-year contracts with renewal escalators

Key features

  • +Behavioral analysis (query log mining)
  • +Lexicon business glossary
  • +Column-level lineage (DW + BI)
  • +Stewardship workflows
  • +Snowflake-deep integration
  • +Alation Anywhere (in-context catalog within BI tools)
  • +Data Governance App (separate SKU)
  • +AI assistance (Alation ALLIE)
100+ integrations
SnowflakeDatabricksBigQueryTableauPower BILookerdbtInformatica
Geography
Global; strongest in US, EU, UK
#7

DataHub

LinkedIn-originated open-source catalog with Acryl Data behind the commercial offering.

Founded 2020 · San Francisco, CA · private · 200-100,000+ employees
G2 4.5 (85)
Capterra 4.5
From $0 /mo
◐ Partial disclosure
Visit DataHub

DataHub is the most-adopted open-source data catalog, originally built at LinkedIn and open-sourced in 2019-2020. Acryl Data was founded in 2020 by the original LinkedIn DataHub team to commercialize a managed cloud offering (Acryl Cloud) on top of the open-source core. Raised $26M Series A in 2022. Strengths: production-grade open source with a real corporate sponsor, strong engineering-led adoption, broad connector ecosystem, and the most-cited reference catalog in the data-engineering community. Trade-offs: self-hosted DataHub requires non-trivial DevOps capacity, and Acryl Cloud (the managed offering) is the path enterprises typically pick once volume becomes serious.

Best for

Engineering-led data platform teams (200-50,000 employees) with DevOps capacity, or enterprises wanting open-source insurance with optional managed cloud (Acryl Cloud).

Worst for

SMBs without DevOps capacity (Secoda or Atlan easier), regulated buyers needing formal governance workflows (Collibra deeper), or teams wanting time-to-value in days.

Strengths

  • Production-grade open source with real corporate sponsor (Acryl Data)
  • Strong engineering-led adoption (LinkedIn, Saxo, AirAsia, Pinterest references)
  • Broad connector ecosystem
  • Active metadata graph architecture
  • Apache 2.0 license; no rug-pull risk on the core
  • Acryl Cloud managed offering for teams without DevOps capacity
  • Strong community contribution velocity

Weaknesses

  • Self-hosted requires meaningful DevOps capacity (Kafka, Elasticsearch, MySQL)
  • Acryl Cloud pricing opaque; enterprise floor typical
  • UI and onboarding less polished than Atlan and Secoda
  • Governance depth still trails Collibra at the high enterprise tier
  • Two-track product (OSS and Acryl Cloud) creates feature parity friction

Pricing tiers

partial
  • DataHub OSS
    Apache 2.0; self-hosted, free
    $0 /mo
  • Acryl Cloud Starter
    Managed cloud entry tier
    Quote
  • Acryl Cloud Enterprise
    Full governance, SSO, premium support
    Quote
Watch for
  • · Self-hosted DataHub: Kafka, Elasticsearch, MySQL infra and operating cost
  • · DevOps and platform engineering time on self-hosted
  • · Acryl Cloud connector premiums
  • · Multi-year contracts standard at Enterprise tier

Key features

  • +Active metadata graph
  • +Column-level lineage
  • +Data quality assertions (DataHub Actions)
  • +Business glossary and ontology
  • +Search and discovery
  • +Stewardship workflows
  • +Open-source with Apache 2.0 license
  • +Acryl Cloud managed offering
90+ integrations
SnowflakeBigQueryDatabricksdbtAirflowKafkaLookerTableau
Geography
Global; strongest in US, EU, India
#5

Secoda

Modern SMB-to-mid-market catalog with strong AI-assisted documentation.

Founded 2020 · Toronto, Canada · private · 50-500 employees
G2 4.7 (110)
Capterra 4.7
From $0 /mo
● Transparent pricing
Visit Secoda

Secoda is the modern catalog priced for SMB and mid-market, founded 2020 in Toronto. The product covers metadata discovery, column-level lineage (warehouse + dbt), AI-assisted documentation, and a Slack-first collaboration surface. Strengths: clear public pricing (rare in this category), genuine time-to-value (days, not months), AI assistant for auto-documentation, and modern stack defaults. Raised $14M Series A in 2023. Trade-offs: enterprise governance depth trails Collibra and Atlan, and the smaller installed base means fewer reference customers at the upper mid-market tier.

Best for

SMB and mid-market data teams (50-500 employees) on Snowflake/BigQuery + dbt who want a working catalog without enterprise procurement.

Worst for

Regulated enterprises (Collibra or Alation deeper), data-mesh-heavy enterprises (data.world fits paradigm), or teams that require on-prem governance.

Strengths

  • Clear public pricing (rare in this category)
  • Genuine time-to-value, days not months
  • AI assistant for auto-documentation and discovery
  • Modern stack defaults (Snowflake, BigQuery, dbt, Looker)
  • Slack-first collaboration
  • Strong SMB and mid-market fit
  • Active product velocity

Weaknesses

  • Enterprise governance depth trails Collibra and Atlan
  • Smaller installed base, fewer upper-mid-market references
  • Series A stage creates some renewal anchoring concerns at small accounts
  • Connector ecosystem narrower than the leaders
  • Less mature on regulated and on-prem deployment requirements

Pricing tiers

public
  • Free
    Up to 5 users; limited integrations
    $0 /mo
  • Team
    $50/user/month billed annually
    $50+$50 /mo +/emp
  • Business
    ~$75-$100/user/month; AI features, SSO
    $0 /mo
  • Enterprise
    Advanced governance, dedicated support
    Quote
Watch for
  • · AI assistant consumption charges on higher tiers
  • · Premium connectors and custom integrations
  • · Multi-year contracts standard at Business and Enterprise

Key features

  • +AI-assisted auto-documentation
  • +Column-level lineage (warehouse + dbt)
  • +Slack-first collaboration
  • +Business glossary
  • +Metadata search and discovery
  • +Question and answer module for analyst self-serve
  • +Modern stack-native integrations
  • +Public pricing with self-serve onboarding
60+ integrations
SnowflakeBigQueryDatabricksdbtLookerTableauPostgreSQLSlack
Geography
Global; strongest in US, Canada, UK, EU
#6

Select Star

Lineage-anchored modern catalog with automatic column-level parsing.

Founded 2020 · San Francisco, CA · private · 50-1,000 employees
G2 4.7 (65)
Capterra 4.7
From $0 /mo
◐ Partial disclosure
Visit Select Star

Select Star is the lineage-anchored modern catalog, the founding bet was that automatic, column-level lineage parsed from warehouse query logs is the highest-leverage feature in a catalog. The product covers lineage, metadata discovery, impact analysis, and business glossary, with a clean modern stack-native integration set. Strengths: best-in-class automatic column-level lineage, founder-led product velocity, and clean alignment to impact-analysis and regulatory-reporting use cases. Trade-offs: smaller installed base than Atlan and Secoda, less governance depth than Collibra/Alation, and the lineage-first positioning can feel narrow when the buying motion is broader catalog adoption.

Best for

Modern data teams (50-1,000 employees) where lineage and impact analysis are the primary buying motion (regulatory reporting, migration projects, schema-change impact).

Worst for

Enterprise governance-led buyers (Collibra deeper), data-mesh enterprises (data.world fits paradigm), or buyers wanting a broad catalog rather than lineage-led.

Strengths

  • Best-in-class automatic column-level lineage parsing
  • Strong impact analysis for regulatory and migration work
  • Founder-led product velocity
  • Clean modern-stack integration set (Snowflake, BigQuery, dbt, Looker, Tableau)
  • Useful Chrome extension for in-context lineage in BI tools
  • Public starter pricing on the marketing site

Weaknesses

  • Smaller installed base than Atlan and Secoda
  • Less governance depth than Collibra and Alation
  • Lineage-first positioning can feel narrow on broader catalog buying motions
  • Series A stage; renewal anchoring on smaller accounts
  • Connector ecosystem narrower than the leaders

Pricing tiers

partial
  • Starter
    From ~$500/month entry-point
    $0 /mo
  • Team
    Mid-market tier with lineage and discovery
    Quote
  • Enterprise
    Full lineage, governance, SSO, custom integrations
    Quote
Watch for
  • · Premium connector packs
  • · Per-seat scaling at growth-stage
  • · Multi-year contracts standard at Enterprise

Key features

  • +Automatic column-level lineage
  • +Impact analysis (downstream and upstream)
  • +Metadata discovery and search
  • +Business glossary
  • +Chrome extension for in-context lineage
  • +dbt integration
  • +Documentation and tagging
  • +API for active metadata flows
40+ integrations
SnowflakeBigQueryDatabricksdbtLookerTableauModeRedshift
Geography
Global; strongest in US
#4

data.world

Knowledge-graph catalog aligned with data mesh and strong in public sector.

Founded 2015 · Austin, TX · private · 500-50,000+ employees
G2 4.4 (95)
Capterra 4.5
Custom quote
○ Sales call required
Visit data.world

data.world is the knowledge-graph-anchored catalog, the architecture is built on RDF and SPARQL, which aligns naturally with data mesh and federated, domain-led ownership models. Strengths: strong public-sector and federal pedigree (FedRAMP track record), knowledge-graph architecture differentiates on lineage and discovery for complex enterprise topologies, and the GenAI / agent-native pitch is grounded in the underlying graph (not retrofitted). Raised $50M Series C in 2022. Trade-offs: outside data-mesh and public-sector accounts, data.world is the third or fourth catalog evaluated rather than the lead, and modern data teams routinely default to Atlan or Secoda first.

Best for

Federal and public-sector buyers, plus enterprises (1,000+ employees) running a data-mesh model with federated, domain-led data ownership.

Worst for

Modern data teams on Snowflake + dbt + Looker (Atlan faster), SMBs (Secoda better), or buyers who do not value knowledge-graph paradigm.

Strengths

  • Knowledge-graph (RDF/SPARQL) architecture aligns with data mesh
  • Strong federal and public-sector references (FedRAMP track record)
  • Lineage and discovery for complex enterprise topologies
  • GenAI and agent-native pitch grounded in the underlying graph
  • Mature business glossary and ontology tooling
  • Strong community and open data heritage
  • Hybrid and on-prem deployment available for federal

Weaknesses

  • Outside data-mesh and public sector, rarely the lead evaluation
  • Modern data teams default to Atlan or Secoda first
  • Knowledge-graph paradigm has a learning curve for SQL-only teams
  • Pricing opaque; enterprise floor typical
  • Connector ecosystem narrower than Collibra or Atlan

Pricing tiers

opaque
  • Team
    Departmental and growth-stage
    Quote
  • Enterprise
    Full catalog, governance, knowledge graph
    Quote
  • FedRAMP
    Federal and public-sector tier
    Quote
Watch for
  • · Premium connector packs
  • · Implementation services on Enterprise and FedRAMP
  • · Multi-year contracts standard

Key features

  • +Knowledge-graph (RDF/SPARQL) data model
  • +Business glossary and ontology
  • +Column-level lineage
  • +Data mesh and data products tooling
  • +Eureka GenAI assistant
  • +FedRAMP-authorized deployment option
  • +Open data and community features
  • +Federation across distributed domains
80+ integrations
SnowflakeDatabricksBigQueryTableauPower BISalesforceAWS Glue
Geography
Global; strongest in US federal and public sector
#8

Metaplane

Observability-anchored catalog acquired by Datadog; standalone roadmap unclear.

Founded 2020 · Boston, MA · public · 100-5,000 employees
G2 4.6 (75)
Capterra 4.6
Custom quote
○ Sales call required
Visit Metaplane

Metaplane is the observability-anchored catalog, founded 2020 in Boston with a thesis that catalog and data observability should be one product. Raised $14M Series A in 2023. Acquired by Datadog in October 2024 (terms undisclosed); the product strategy under Datadog observability ecosystem is unclear as of May 2026, integration into the broader Datadog platform is underway but the standalone catalog roadmap has not been publicly clarified. Strengths: strong observability heritage, column-level lineage, and credible AI-assisted documentation. Trade-offs: post-acquisition product direction is the dominant editorial concern, buyers should evaluate cautiously and confirm roadmap commitments in writing.

Best for

Teams already standardizing on Datadog observability who are willing to bet on the Metaplane + Datadog integration roadmap, and who want catalog plus observability under one vendor.

Worst for

Pure-play catalog buyers (Atlan, Secoda, Select Star clearer), regulated enterprises (Collibra deeper), or buyers who want explicit standalone roadmap commitments.

Strengths

  • Strong observability and freshness-monitoring heritage
  • Column-level lineage parsed from warehouse query logs
  • Useful AI-assisted documentation
  • Datadog acquisition (Oct 2024) means deeper pockets and infra
  • Slack-first collaboration
  • Modern stack-native (Snowflake, BigQuery, dbt, Looker)

Weaknesses

  • Post-Datadog acquisition product strategy unclear as of May 2026
  • Standalone catalog roadmap has not been publicly clarified
  • Pricing opaque under Datadog SKU model (Datadog billing complexity is its own thing)
  • Risk of being folded into broader Datadog observability rather than maintained as catalog
  • Catalog buyers may prefer pure-play vendors with clear catalog roadmap

Pricing tiers

opaque
  • Metaplane (legacy)
    Pre-acquisition pricing being migrated to Datadog SKU
    Quote
  • Datadog Data Observability
    Post-acquisition Datadog tier; bundled with broader observability
    Quote
Watch for
  • · Datadog SKU and billing complexity
  • · Bundling pressure into broader Datadog observability
  • · Migration costs for legacy Metaplane customers

Key features

  • +Data observability (freshness, volume, schema, lineage)
  • +Column-level lineage
  • +AI-assisted documentation
  • +Catalog discovery surface
  • +Slack-first alerting
  • +Anomaly detection on metric monitors
  • +Datadog integration (post-acquisition)
50+ integrations
SnowflakeBigQueryDatabricksdbtLookerTableauSlackPagerDuty
Geography
Global; strongest in US, EU
#9

Amundsen

Lyft-originated open-source catalog with no commercial entity behind it.

Founded 2019 · San Francisco, CA · private · 200+ employees
G2 4.3 (25)
Capterra 4.3
From $0 /mo
● Transparent pricing
Visit Amundsen

Amundsen is the Lyft-originated open-source catalog, open-sourced in 2019 and contributed as an Apache project. Strengths: clean foundational architecture, broad open-source adoption in 2019-2022, and free self-hosted deployment. Trade-offs: development pace has slowed since 2023, there is no commercial entity (no Acryl Data equivalent), and the project is realistically in maintenance mode versus the active development pace at DataHub. Recommended only for engineering teams with DevOps capacity who explicitly want a free, self-hosted catalog with no managed alternative on offer.

Best for

Engineering teams (200+ employees) with DevOps capacity who explicitly want a free, self-hosted catalog and accept no commercial support path.

Worst for

Teams without DevOps capacity, regulated buyers needing formal governance, or anyone who needs vendor accountability and an SLA path.

Strengths

  • Open source, free self-hosted
  • Clean foundational architecture from Lyft
  • Broad community familiarity (2019-2022 adoption wave)
  • Apache project governance
  • Basic lineage, discovery, and metadata search

Weaknesses

  • Development pace slowed since 2023
  • No commercial entity (no Acryl Data equivalent for Amundsen)
  • Realistically in maintenance mode versus DataHub
  • No managed cloud offering
  • Lineage and active metadata trail DataHub and modern catalogs
  • Connector ecosystem narrower than DataHub

Pricing tiers

public
  • Amundsen OSS
    Apache 2.0; self-hosted, free; no managed alternative
    $0 /mo
Watch for
  • · Self-hosted infra (Neo4j or Atlas backend, Elasticsearch, Postgres)
  • · DevOps and platform engineering time
  • · No commercial support path; community-only

Key features

  • +Metadata search and discovery
  • +Basic lineage
  • +Business glossary
  • +Apache project governance
  • +Lyft-originated architecture
  • +Self-hosted on Kubernetes
30+ integrations
SnowflakeBigQueryRedshiftHivePostgresLookerTableau
Geography
Global (community)
#10

Apache Atlas

Hadoop-ecosystem heritage catalog with declining adoption as Hadoop matures down.

Founded 2015 · Apache Software Foundation (project) · private · 500+ employees
G2 3.9 (18)
Capterra 4.0
From $0 /mo
● Transparent pricing
Visit Apache Atlas

Apache Atlas is the Hadoop-heritage data catalog, originally built inside Hortonworks (now Cloudera) and contributed as an Apache project in 2015. Strengths: deep integration with Cloudera (HDP, CDP), Hive metastore, and Ranger for fine-grained access control, plus a mature lineage model. Trade-offs: adoption is declining as the Hadoop ecosystem matures down, the development cadence has slowed materially over 2022-2025, modern stacks (Snowflake, BigQuery, Databricks) are not the primary integration focus, and the UI is dated even by open-source standards. Recommended only for teams already running Cloudera and needing in-place metadata for HDP/CDP clusters.

Best for

Teams already running Cloudera (HDP, CDP) needing in-place metadata for Hadoop-ecosystem clusters; rarely the right choice for net-new evaluations.

Worst for

Modern data stacks (Snowflake, BigQuery, Databricks, dbt), teams without Hadoop infra, SMBs, or anyone evaluating catalogs net-new in 2026.

Strengths

  • Deep Cloudera (HDP, CDP) integration
  • Hive metastore and Ranger integration mature
  • Apache project governance
  • Mature lineage model for Hadoop-ecosystem workloads
  • Free open source under Apache 2.0

Weaknesses

  • Adoption declining as Hadoop ecosystem matures down
  • Development cadence slowed materially over 2022-2025
  • Modern stack (Snowflake, BigQuery, Databricks) is not the primary integration focus
  • UI dated even by open-source standards
  • No commercial entity beyond Cloudera distribution
  • Realistically a legacy choice in 2026

Pricing tiers

public
  • Apache Atlas OSS
    Free, self-hosted; typically deployed alongside Cloudera CDP
    $0 /mo
Watch for
  • · Hadoop infra (HBase, Solr, Kafka) operating cost
  • · Cloudera CDP license if deployed in supported context
  • · DevOps and Hadoop platform engineering time

Key features

  • +Hadoop-ecosystem metadata management
  • +Lineage across Hive, HDFS, HBase, Kafka
  • +Ranger integration for fine-grained access control
  • +Apache project governance
  • +Classification and tagging
  • +Business glossary
  • +REST API
20+ integrations
Cloudera CDPHiveHBaseKafkaRangerHDFS
Geography
Global (community)

Frequently asked questions

The questions buyers actually ask before they sign.

Why should Indian buyers choose Atlan over Collibra?
Atlan is the natural first choice for Indian data teams for three reasons: it is Indian-founded (New Delhi, 2018) with deep engineering roots in India; it is built for the modern data stack (Snowflake, BigQuery, dbt, Looker) that Indian SaaS companies run; and it has a data-team-led buying motion rather than a formal-data-office governance buying motion, which matches how Indian product companies make data tooling decisions. Collibra is the right choice only in specific contexts: Indian IT-services firms where US/EU clients mandate Collibra in delivery contracts, or large Indian financial services organizations with a formal data governance office and budget for a 6-12 month SI-led implementation. For most Indian product companies, Atlan is the correct 2026 answer.
How does DPDP Act 2023 affect data catalog buying decisions in India?
DPDP Act 2023 (in effect from 2025) requires organizations handling personal data of Indian users to maintain records of processing activities, respond to data-principal access and deletion requests, and demonstrate data-minimization controls to the Data Protection Board. Data catalogs with automated personal-data classification, lineage, and data-subject-request workflows are the infrastructure layer for DPDP compliance. Atlan, Collibra, and Alation have the strongest DPDP-aligned capabilities (data classification, lineage, consent metadata). Indian organizations investing in DPDP compliance should treat the data catalog as a DPDP infrastructure investment rather than a pure analytics productivity tool; this changes the business case from engineering productivity to regulatory compliance.
Is Apache Atlas still a viable option for Indian IT services firms?
Apache Atlas is in maintenance mode. Development velocity has slowed sharply as the Hadoop ecosystem matures down; the Cloudera Data Platform and Hortonworks community that drove Atlas adoption are contracting. For net-new catalog decisions in Indian IT services in 2026, Apache Atlas should not be selected. Existing Atlas installations at Indian IT services firms running Cloudera or HDP should plan migration to Atlan, DataHub, or Collibra over 24-36 months depending on Hadoop-platform deprecation timelines. The only context where Atlas remains justified in India is a brownfield environment already deeply embedded in Apache Ranger/Spark/Hive where the cost of migration exceeds the cost of maintaining Atlas for 2-3 more years.
What does a data catalog actually do, and when do you actually need one?
A data catalog inventories your data assets (tables, columns, dashboards, models), captures lineage between them, and surfaces a search and stewardship layer so analysts and engineers can find, trust, and govern data. You actually need one when: (1) you have more than 1,000 tables across your warehouse plus dbt models plus BI assets, (2) analysts spend more than 10% of their time asking "what is this column?" in Slack, or (3) a regulator or auditor needs you to show data lineage and stewardship. Smaller teams can survive on a documented dbt project plus Notion or Confluence; the catalog is the upgrade once that surface stops scaling.
Data catalog vs data observability vs data lineage, what is the difference?
A data catalog is the inventory and discovery surface (Atlan, Collibra, Secoda). Data observability is the freshness, volume, schema-change, and quality monitoring layer (Monte Carlo, Bigeye, Anomalo, Metaplane). Data lineage is the graph that connects assets to upstream and downstream (every modern catalog ships lineage; observability tools also use lineage for impact analysis). The categories are converging in 2026, Atlan, Secoda, and Metaplane all do lineage; DataHub does observability assertions; observability vendors are adding catalog. Most buyers pick one primary catalog plus one primary observability tool, or accept the trade-off of a less mature combined product.
AI-assisted cataloging, is it real or hype?
Real and hype, depending on what you measure. Working: auto-documentation of warehouse tables and columns where lineage and naming conventions are reasonable (Atlan, Secoda, DataHub, Alation all do this credibly). Hype: agent-grade natural-language data discovery that handles ambiguous business questions without a curated business glossary (still poor across all vendors). Editorial guidance: test AI features on a representative slice of your worst metadata (legacy, badly named, half-documented) before signing. If the AI gives confident-sounding wrong answers there, it will give them in production.
Open source vs proprietary, which fits better?
Open source (DataHub OSS, Amundsen, Apache Atlas) fits engineering-led teams with DevOps capacity who want vendor insurance and accept self-hosted operating cost. DataHub is the active open-source choice in 2026; Amundsen is in maintenance mode; Apache Atlas is legacy-Hadoop. Proprietary SaaS (Atlan, Secoda, Select Star, Collibra, Alation) fits teams that want time-to-value in days or weeks, formal governance, and a vendor SLA. The middle ground is Acryl Cloud (managed DataHub) for teams who want open-source insurance with a managed path.
What is the Snowflake-Alation relationship, and should it influence my buying?
Snowflake Ventures participated in the November 2022 Alation Series E at a $1.7B valuation. Snowflake field reps frequently route Alation in joint accounts and the technical integration is deeper than Snowflake plus other catalogs. This is real and a legitimate reason to evaluate Alation if you are Snowflake-anchored. It should not be the only reason, modern catalogs (Atlan especially) have closed the Snowflake metadata gap meaningfully over 2024-2025. Run a 4-week parallel evaluation if your stack is Snowflake plus dbt plus modern BI.
What happened with Metaplane after the Datadog acquisition?
Datadog acquired Metaplane in October 2024; terms were not disclosed. As of May 2026, the product is being integrated into the broader Datadog observability platform under a "Data Observability" SKU, the standalone catalog roadmap has not been publicly clarified, and pricing is moving onto the Datadog billing model. Editorial guidance: if you are not already standardizing on Datadog, do not pick Metaplane net-new in 2026 until the product strategy is clearer. If you are Datadog-anchored, get a written roadmap commitment from sales before signing a multi-year deal.
Collibra had layoffs and a valuation reset, is it still safe to buy?
Collibra is the largest pure-play catalog vendor and the deepest governance product; the company is not at existential risk. The 2023 layoffs (January and September) and post-2022 valuation reset are legitimate diligence items. Practical guidance for buyers: ask for customer-success continuity guarantees in writing, push for shorter initial terms (1-2 years rather than 3), and negotiate exit provisions. Regulated enterprises with formal governance mandates still default to Collibra; modern data-team-led buyers have viable alternatives in Atlan and Secoda.
How much should I budget for a data catalog?
SMB (under 50 employees): $0-$10K annually (Secoda Free or Team, DataHub OSS, Amundsen self-hosted). Lower mid-market (50-200): $20K-$60K (Secoda, Select Star, Atlan Starter). Mid-market (200-1,000): $60K-$200K (Atlan Pro, Alation, Secoda Business, Acryl Cloud). Enterprise (1,000-5,000): $200K-$500K (Collibra, Alation, Atlan Enterprise, Acryl Cloud Enterprise). Large enterprise (5,000+): $500K-$1.5M+ (Collibra, Alation, data.world enterprise). Collibra at the high enterprise tier routinely crosses $1M including SI implementation.
How long does a catalog implementation actually take?
Modern catalogs (Atlan, Secoda, Select Star, DataHub Acryl Cloud): 2-8 weeks to a working catalog with lineage on modern stack. Collibra: 6-12 months to production governance, typically with an SI partner. Alation: 3-9 months. data.world: 3-9 months. Self-hosted open source (DataHub OSS, Amundsen, Apache Atlas): plan for 4-12 weeks of platform engineering before going live, plus ongoing operating overhead. Implementation length is the single biggest hidden cost in the category.
Should we evaluate via free trial or proof of concept?
Free permanent: DataHub OSS, Amundsen, Apache Atlas, Secoda Free. Free trial: Atlan (demo), Secoda Team (14 days), Select Star (14 days), Acryl Cloud (demo). Demo only at enterprise tier: Collibra, Alation, data.world. Editorial guidance: run a 4-week parallel evaluation against your real warehouse, dbt project, and top 3 BI dashboards. Score on (1) automatic lineage coverage on your stack, (2) time to first useful catalog entry, (3) Slack or BI integration friction, and (4) AI documentation quality on your worst metadata. Headline feature lists are nearly identical across vendors in 2026; the gap is in real-data fidelity.

Final word

Looking at a different market? See the global Data Catalog Software ranking, or pick another country at the top of this page.

Last updated 2026-05-19. Local pricing reverified quarterly. Found something inaccurate? Tell us.