If you’re evaluating Google SecOps SOAR for soar software, the three strongest independent alternatives in our editorial ranking are Splunk SOAR, Cortex XSOAR, Tines. Each has a different best-fit buyer — the right choice depends on team size and workflow, not on which has the loudest review-site presence.
Why Google SecOps SOAR sometimes isn’t the right pick: Non-Google customers (no compelling reason to choose), Splunk-anchored SOCs (Splunk SOAR wins), or buyers prioritizing top-tier customer support. See full “worst for” verdict →
9 Google SecOps SOAR alternatives
| Rank | Product | Best for | Target size | Pricing |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | Splunk SOAR | Mature SOC teams (10+ analysts) already running Splunk Enterprise Security where deep Python-extensible playbooks are critical and Splunk-native integration is non-negotiable. | 1,000-100,000+ | ○ Quote-only |
| #2 | Cortex XSOAR | Palo Alto Networks-anchored SOCs running Cortex XDR or XSIAM that need the deepest playbook marketplace and are willing to commit to the Palo Alto ecosystem for the next 5 years. | 1,000-100,000+ | ○ Quote-only |
| #3 | Tines | Engineering-led security and IT teams (50-3,000 employees) that want no-code workflow automation without legacy SOAR vendor baggage. Best for organizations that value author productivity over playbook marketplace depth. | 50-3,000+ | ◐ Partial |
| #4 | Torq | Modern SOC teams (100-3,000 employees) pursuing hyperautomation that want a fast-moving, no-code platform with code escape hatch and founder team with deep SOAR expertise. | 100-3,000+ | ○ Quote-only |
| #5 | Swimlane | Mid-market and enterprise SOC teams (500-5,000 employees) pursuing autonomous SOC operations with AI-native playbook authoring, especially those wanting to avoid acquired vendors with post-deal uncertainty. | 500-10,000 | ○ Quote-only |
| #7 | IBM Security QRadar SOAR | Traditional enterprises (banks, insurance, government, healthcare) with existing IBM QRadar SIEM footprint and incident response process maturity requirements. | 1,000-100,000+ | ○ Quote-only |
| #8 | ServiceNow Security Operations | Large enterprises (5,000+ employees) where ServiceNow is the system of record for IT and where SOC-to-IT handoff is the biggest operational pain. | 5,000-100,000+ | ○ Quote-only |
| #9 | D3 Smart SOAR | MSSPs and mid-market SOC teams (200-2,000 employees) that value vendor independence, MITRE ATT&CK-aligned content, and hybrid (SaaS or on-prem) deployment. | 200-5,000 | ○ Quote-only |
| #10 | LogicHub (Devo SOAR) | Existing Devo SIEM customers wanting bundled SOAR on the same petabyte-scale data platform, particularly MSSPs combining SIEM + SOAR for clients. | 500-10,000+ | ○ Quote-only |
Which alternative for which buyer
Splunk SOAR
Deepest playbook engine for Splunk-anchored SOCs.
Mature SOC teams (10+ analysts) already running Splunk Enterprise Security where deep Python-extensible playbooks are critical and Splunk-native integration is non-negotiable.
Non-Splunk SOCs (XSOAR or Tines win), engineering-led teams wanting no-code (Tines, Torq win), or mid-market without Python skills on the security team.
Cortex XSOAR
War-chest playbook marketplace, with XSIAM convergence ahead.
Palo Alto Networks-anchored SOCs running Cortex XDR or XSIAM that need the deepest playbook marketplace and are willing to commit to the Palo Alto ecosystem for the next 5 years.
Non-Palo Alto SOCs (XSOAR list price not justified outside the stack), engineering-led teams (Tines, Torq win), or buyers nervous about XSIAM cannibalization.
Tines
No-code automation, security-born, now expanding into IT and engineering.
Engineering-led security and IT teams (50-3,000 employees) that want no-code workflow automation without legacy SOAR vendor baggage. Best for organizations that value author productivity over playbook marketplace depth.
Fortune 500 SOCs running Splunk ES (Splunk SOAR wins), Palo Alto-anchored shops (XSOAR wins), or organizations needing 1,000+ pre-built playbooks.
Torq
Hyperautomation positioning, founded by the original Demisto team.
Modern SOC teams (100-3,000 employees) pursuing hyperautomation that want a fast-moving, no-code platform with code escape hatch and founder team with deep SOAR expertise.
Fortune 500 SOCs (Splunk SOAR or XSOAR win), buyers wanting public pricing (Tines wins), or risk-averse organizations preferring established incumbents.
Swimlane
AI-native SOAR rewrite with the Turbine engine.
Mid-market and enterprise SOC teams (500-5,000 employees) pursuing autonomous SOC operations with AI-native playbook authoring, especially those wanting to avoid acquired vendors with post-deal uncertainty.
Splunk-anchored SOCs (Splunk SOAR wins), Palo Alto-anchored shops (XSOAR wins), or buyers wanting public pricing (Tines wins).
IBM Security QRadar SOAR
Resilient, after IBM bought it; integrated into QRadar.
Traditional enterprises (banks, insurance, government, healthcare) with existing IBM QRadar SIEM footprint and incident response process maturity requirements.
Cloud-native organizations (Tines, Torq, Splunk SOAR win), buyers nervous about IBM-to-Palo Alto transition, or anyone needing modern UX.
Related editorial
- Full Top 10 SOAR (Security Orchestration, Automation, and Response) Software for 2026 ranking with comparison table and decision matrix →
- Who shouldn’t buy Google SecOps SOAR? Editorial “worst for” verdict →
- Google SecOps SOAR vendor trust score (6 dimensions, dated) →
- Google SecOps SOAR full intelligence profile →
Last updated 2026-05-10. Rankings reflect editorial judgment based on the published Top 10 SOAR (Security Orchestration, Automation, and Response) Software for 2026. We accept no vendor payments. Found something inaccurate? Tell us.