Non-Splunk SOCs (XSOAR or Tines win), engineering-led teams wanting no-code (Tines, Torq win), or mid-market without Python skills on the security team.
Mature SOC teams (10+ analysts) already running Splunk Enterprise Security where deep Python-extensible playbooks are critical and Splunk-native integration is non-negotiable.
Why we say this
Editorial pulled these weaknesses from Splunk SOAR’s product card in our Top 10 SOAR (Security Orchestration, Automation, and Response) Software for 2026:
- ! Pricing complexity post-Cisco; multiple pricing models still settling
- ! Phantom-to-Splunk SOAR rebrand caused customer confusion
- ! Cisco SecureX deprecation (2025) created intermediate uncertainty
- ! Python-first authoring excludes non-developer security analysts
- ! Implementation 8-20 weeks for Fortune 500 deployments
- ! Customer support response times flagged through Cisco transition
If Splunk SOAR is wrong for you, consider these instead
Same SOAR Software category, different best-fit buyer.
Best for
Engineering-led security and IT teams (50-3,000 employees) that want no-code workflow automation without legacy SOAR vendor baggage. Best for organizations that value author productivity over playbook marketplace depth.
See full profile →Best for
Mid-market and enterprise SOC teams (500-5,000 employees) pursuing autonomous SOC operations with AI-native playbook authoring, especially those wanting to avoid acquired vendors with post-deal uncertainty.
See full profile →Best for
MSSPs and mid-market SOC teams (200-2,000 employees) that value vendor independence, MITRE ATT&CK-aligned content, and hybrid (SaaS or on-prem) deployment.
See full profile →Related editorial
Last updated 2026-05-10. Editorial verdict based on the published Top 10 SOAR (Security Orchestration, Automation, and Response) Software for 2026 ranking. Disagree? Tell us.