Mid-market buyers who originally bought Perimeter 81 for its transparent published pricing (motion changed post-acquisition), or buyers wary of post-acquisition product velocity slowdowns.
Buyers consolidating onto Check Point Harmony security platform (Endpoint + Email + Mobile + SASE), valuing single-vendor consolidation over best-of-breed.
Why we say this
Editorial pulled these weaknesses from Perimeter 81 (Check Point Harmony SASE)’s product card in our Top 10 Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) Software (2026):
- ! Post-acquisition product velocity slowed meaningfully
- ! Transparent pricing motion replaced with Check Point enterprise process
- ! Check Point support quality varies; mid-market customers report friction
- ! Brand uncertainty during rebrand to Harmony SASE
- ! Roadmap visibility reduced post-integration
If Perimeter 81 (Check Point Harmony SASE) is wrong for you, consider these instead
Same Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) category, different best-fit buyer.
Best for
Organizations (100-50,000 employees) valuing edge-network performance, transparent published pricing, and developer-friendly deployment with broad protocol support beyond HTTP.
See full profile →Best for
Mid-market to enterprise buyers (1,000-50,000+ employees) consolidating multiple security tools onto one SSE platform, particularly those leading with CASB / DLP needs.
See full profile →Best for
Engineering teams, devops, and SMB-to-mid-market organizations (10-2,000 employees) wanting frictionless WireGuard mesh access rather than full SASE rollouts.
See full profile →Related editorial
Last updated 2026-05-10. Editorial verdict based on the published Top 10 Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) Software (2026) ranking. Disagree? Tell us.