Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA)
Independent ranking of Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) platforms, verified deal pricing, six-dimension vendor trust scoring.
Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) is the legacy-VPN replacement architecture: identity-aware, application-level access with continuous verification, no implicit network trust. In 2026 the category has fully collapsed into SASE/SSE, every credible ZTNA vendor now ships ZTNA inside a broader secure-edge platform (Secure Web Gateway, CASB, FWaaS, DLP), and standalone ZTNA is dead as a procurement category. Zscaler remains the SASE leader on scale and FedRAMP depth (ZIA + ZPA + ZDX, ~$2.2B revenue FY24) but pricing escalated meaningfully at renewal. Cloudflare One has emerged as the credible challenger leveraging the company's 320+ POP edge network and developer-friendly pricing. Tailscale and Twingate are the developer-first picks; Tailscale's 2024 BSL license switch raised community concerns even as the WireGuard-based mesh continues to win mindshare. Netskope and Cato Networks are the comprehensive SSE/SASE alternatives, both pursuing $2B+ IPO valuations in 2024-2025. Perimeter 81 was absorbed by Check Point in August 2023 for $490M and rebranded Harmony SASE, with the predictable post-acquisition product-velocity slowdown. Cisco, Palo Alto, and Fortinet round out the legacy-network-vendor field, each leaning on installed-base distribution rather than greenfield architecture. The 2026 structural shift: identity-aware proxies and agentless browser-based access are taking share from agent-heavy deployments, and FedRAMP High is now the procurement gate for federal and regulated buyers.
All 10 products, ranked
- #1
Zscaler
G2 4.4 (980)SASE category leader with proven hyperscale and FedRAMP High depth.
Zscaler is the SASE / SSE category leader, public on NASDAQ:ZS since 2018, founded 2007 by Jay Chaudhry (still CEO). The product portfolio (Zscaler Internet Access / ZIA, Zscaler Private Access / ZPA, Zscaler Digital Experience / ZDX) covers the full SSE stack: secure web gateway, ZTNA, CASB, DLP, and digital-experience monitoring. Best fit for global enterprises (5,000+ employees) requiring proven hyperscale, FedRAMP High authorization, and deep direct-to-cloud architecture. The company reported ~$2.2B revenue FY24 with strong growth, and maintains a 150+ data-center global footprint. Trade-offs: pricing has escalated meaningfully at renewal (10-20% increases consistently reported), enterprise-only sales motion makes mid-market procurement painful, and the April 2024 alleged-stolen-credentials investigation (Zscaler concluded no breach occurred but the disclosure cycle dented trust briefly) is still cited by some buyers. The product is also feature-dense to the point of complexity; junior teams routinely underuse what they paid for.
Pricing○ Quote-onlyVendor trust7.3/10Best fit1,000-500,000+Reviews analyzed980 - #2
Cloudflare One
G2 4.6 (620)Edge-network-anchored SSE / ZTNA with the most developer-friendly pricing in category.
Cloudflare One is the SSE / SASE platform built on Cloudflare's 320+ POP global edge network, public on NYSE:NET since 2019. The portfolio includes ZTNA (Access), SWG (Gateway), CASB, DLP, browser isolation, and email security (acquired Area 1 Security 2022). Best fit for organizations valuing edge-network performance, transparent pricing, and developer-friendly deployment. The company's November 2023 disclosure that an Okta-token-related breach attempt occurred (and was contained without customer impact) is a positive vendor-trust signal; the transparency in that disclosure exceeded industry norms. Trade-offs: enterprise feature depth is still narrower than Zscaler or Netskope in some pillars (DLP and CASB depth in particular), the platform's rapid feature expansion creates UX inconsistency across modules, and FedRAMP Moderate authorization (vs Zscaler's High) is the procurement gate for some federal buyers.
Pricing● TransparentVendor trust8.8/10Best fit10-100,000+Reviews analyzed620 - #3
Tailscale
G2 4.8 (240)WireGuard-based mesh VPN with developer-first UX.
Tailscale is the WireGuard-anchored mesh-VPN / ZTNA platform that effectively created the developer-first ZTNA buying motion. Founded 2019 by former Google engineers (including Crawshaw and Pennarun), raised a $100M Series B led by CRV in May 2022 at a reported $1B+ valuation. Best fit for engineering teams, devops shops, and SMB-to-mid-market organizations valuing a frictionless WireGuard mesh over heavy SASE rollouts. The product is famously simple: install agent, authenticate via SSO, machines join the tailnet, ACL policy is declarative. Trade-offs: the May 2024 license switch from BSD/MIT to BSL (Business Source License) raised community concerns about long-term open-source posture (the client remains BSD but the coordination server (control plane) moved to source-available); enterprise compliance features (DLP, CASB, SWG) are absent (Tailscale is pure ZTNA / mesh-VPN, not full SASE); and on-prem / air-gapped deployments require Tailscale Headscale (community OSS) or the commercial Self-Hosted Coordination Server.
Pricing● TransparentVendor trust8.4/10Best fit5-2,000Reviews analyzed240 - #4
Twingate
G2 4.7 (180)Modern remote access designed as a clean VPN replacement.
Twingate is the modern remote-access / ZTNA platform purpose-built as a clean VPN replacement. Founded 2019, raised Series B $42M in 2022 led by Bessemer Venture Partners (BVP), now backed by BVP, 8VC, and WndrCo. Best fit for SMB-to-mid-market organizations (50-2,000 employees) that want VPN replacement without committing to a full SASE platform. The product is purpose-built around split-tunnel architecture with a centralized policy engine (Twingate Controller) and edge connectors deployed near each resource. Trade-offs: Twingate is pure ZTNA (no SASE breadth: no CASB, no DLP, no SWG); the enterprise tier sales motion is still maturing; integration ecosystem is narrower than Zscaler or Cloudflare; and FedRAMP authorization is absent which excludes federal buyers.
Pricing● TransparentVendor trust8.4/10Best fit10-2,000Reviews analyzed180 - #5
Netskope
G2 4.4 (480)Comprehensive SSE / SASE platform with deep CASB heritage.
Netskope is one of the deepest SSE / SASE platforms in the market, founded 2012 with original strength in CASB and now spanning the full SSE stack: CASB, SWG, ZTNA (Netskope Private Access), DLP, RBI, and SD-WAN (acquired Infiot 2022). The company reported ~$700M ARR with IPO speculation across 2024-2025 and is widely viewed as a likely 2026 IPO candidate. Best fit for mid-market to enterprise buyers consolidating multiple security tools onto a single SSE platform, particularly those leading with CASB / DLP requirements. Trade-offs: pricing is opaque and complex (per-module pricing across CASB / SWG / ZTNA / DLP creates surprise costs), the platform's feature density creates implementation complexity, and the company's pre-IPO status creates some buyer caution around enterprise-contract stability.
Pricing○ Quote-onlyVendor trust7.3/10Best fit1,000-100,000+Reviews analyzed480 - #6
Cato Networks
G2 4.5 (320)SASE-pure single-vendor cloud-native architecture.
Cato Networks is the SASE-pure single-cloud-vendor architecture leader, founded 2015 by Shlomo Kramer (Check Point and Imperva co-founder). The product is built ground-up as a single multi-tenant cloud (Cato SASE Cloud) covering SD-WAN, ZTNA, FWaaS, SWG, CASB, DLP, and RBI in a single converged service. The company reported ~$200M ARR with $2B IPO speculation across 2024-2025 and is growing rapidly. Best fit for organizations wanting a single-vendor SD-WAN + ZTNA + security stack without integrating multiple point products. Trade-offs: feature depth in individual pillars is sometimes thinner than best-of-breed (DLP vs Netskope, ZTNA vs Zscaler), customer support quality reports vary by region, and pricing is opaque enterprise-only quotes.
Pricing○ Quote-onlyVendor trust7.7/10Best fit500-25,000Reviews analyzed320 - #7
Perimeter 81 (Check Point Harmony SASE)
G2 4.4 (280)Mid-market ZTNA absorbed into Check Point; rebranded Harmony SASE.
Perimeter 81 was the mid-market ZTNA / Network-as-a-Service vendor acquired by Check Point Software Technologies in August 2023 for $490M, and rebranded as Check Point Harmony SASE within the broader Harmony platform (alongside Harmony Endpoint, Harmony Email). The product was originally founded 2018 to bring enterprise-grade ZTNA to mid-market buyers, with strong G2 ratings and a transparent published pricing motion (rare in this segment pre-acquisition). Best fit, post-acquisition, for buyers consolidating onto Check Point security; standalone procurement signal has weakened. Trade-offs: post-acquisition product velocity has slowed meaningfully (classic Check Point integration pattern), the former transparent pricing motion has been replaced with Check Point enterprise pricing process, and original mid-market customers report mixed experience with Check Point support transition.
Pricing◐ PartialVendor trust7.0/10Best fit50-5,000Reviews analyzed280 - #8
Cisco Secure Access
G2 4.4 (420)Cisco-installed-base SSE / ZTNA via Duo + Umbrella + Secure Connect.
Cisco Secure Access is Cisco's consolidated SSE / SASE offering, bringing together Duo Security (acquired 2018 for $2.4B), Umbrella (DNS-layer security; acquired via OpenDNS 2015 for $635M), and the newer Secure Connect ZTNA module under a unified Security Cloud control plane. Best fit for Cisco-network-anchored enterprises that already run Cisco AnyConnect, Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN, or Cisco firewalls and want consolidated security purchasing. Trade-offs: the platform is the product of multiple acquisitions stitched together (Duo + Umbrella + ThousandEyes + AppDynamics), creating UX inconsistency; product velocity in pure ZTNA lags Zscaler / Cloudflare; per-module pricing creates surprise costs; and the legacy-vendor architecture concern is real (Cisco was late to cloud-native SSE).
Pricing◐ PartialVendor trust7.3/10Best fit1,000-500,000+Reviews analyzed420 - #9
Palo Alto Prisma Access
G2 4.4 (380)Comprehensive SASE flagship from the firewall-heritage leader.
Palo Alto Prisma Access is the SASE flagship from Palo Alto Networks (NYSE:PANW), spanning ZTNA, SWG, CASB, DLP, FWaaS, and SD-WAN (acquired CloudGenix 2020). Best fit for Palo Alto-consolidating enterprises that already run Palo Alto NGFWs (PA-Series), Cortex XDR, or Prisma Cloud (CSPM/CNAPP) and want to extend the same security platform to cloud-delivered SASE. Trade-offs: pricing complexity is the consistent buyer complaint (Prisma Access pricing has multiple tiers, multiple SKUs, and a procurement process that requires Palo Alto sales engagement); the platform's feature density creates implementation complexity; and post-acquisition velocity in the SASE pillar has slowed despite the platform's technical depth.
Pricing○ Quote-onlyVendor trust7.3/10Best fit1,000-500,000+Reviews analyzed380 - #10
Fortinet FortiSASE
G2 4.3 (340)Networking-heritage SASE leveraging FortiGate and FortiClient installed base.
Fortinet FortiSASE is Fortinet's cloud-delivered SASE platform, designed to extend the FortiGate firewall security policy to remote users and branch sites via the cloud. Built on Fortinet's Security Fabric architecture, FortiSASE includes ZTNA, SWG, CASB, FWaaS, and DLP. Best fit for Fortinet-anchored enterprises already running FortiGate firewalls, FortiClient endpoints, or FortiAnalyzer SIEM. Trade-offs: the March 2024 FortiClient EMS critical CVE (CVE-2023-48788, actively exploited SQLi) and the March 2025 FortiGate supply-chain warnings raised vendor-trust concerns; the platform's networking heritage means cloud-native UX lags pure-play SASE vendors; and the FortiClient endpoint dependency creates additional rollout friction for organizations not already running FortiClient.
Pricing◐ PartialVendor trust7.2/10Best fit500-50,000+Reviews analyzed340
How we rank zero trust network access (ztna)
Evaluated 19 ZTNA / SSE / SASE platforms across six weighted factors: ZTNA architecture depth and identity-aware policy quality (20%), SSE/SASE platform breadth (CASB + SWG + DLP + FWaaS coverage) (20%), edge network performance and POP coverage (15%), value and pricing transparency (15%), enterprise compliance posture including FedRAMP authorization (15%), and vendor trust including acquisition history and post-incident behavior (15%). Pricing data compiled from vendor websites Feb-Apr 2026 and crowdsourced from 1,100+ verified buyer disclosures. Reviews from G2, Capterra, Reddit, and Trustpilot feed pattern analysis; editorial publishes only patterns at 15% prevalence or higher across the corpus. Excluded: pure-play SD-WAN vendors without ZTNA (Aryaka, Versa), pure CASB without ZTNA (Bitglass legacy), open-source self-hosted only (OpenZiti, headscale), browser-isolation-only platforms (Menlo Security covered separately), and ZTNA modules from vendors not credible at standalone SSE/SASE scale. Disclosure: 247HRM, the vendor employing this site's sales author, is an HR/payroll vendor unrelated to ZTNA; no commercial relationship exists with any vendor ranked here.
See full deep-dive →- ✓10 products with full intelligence profile
- ✓Verified pricing crowdsourced from real buyers
- ✓Vendor trust scores independent of product quality
- ✓review patterns from G2, Capterra, Reddit, Trustpilot
- ✓Quarterly re-verification of all data