Canada verdict (TL;DR)
Verified 2026-05-27Splunk ES and IBM QRadar still dominate the Big Five Canadian banks (RBC, TD, Scotia, BMO, CIBC) and the largest insurers. Microsoft Sentinel has taken material federal Canadian government and mid-market share through 2024-2026 on Azure Canada Central. Google SecOps grows steadily at GCP Montreal-anchored SaaS firms. Canadian-built MDR/SIEM is genuinely credible: eSentire (Waterloo) and Field Effect (Ottawa) are real options at mid-market and regulated industries. TELUS Security covers the Canadian telco-MSSP segment.
Picks for Canada
- Canadian Big Five bank or large insurer SOC at scale: splunk-es Splunk Enterprise Security is the default at RBC, TD, Scotia, BMO, CIBC, Manulife and Sun Life. Deepest Canadian reference base, mature SOC playbooks at TELUS Security and Canadian MSSPs, AWS Canada Central residency on Splunk Cloud Canada.
- Federal Canadian department or Microsoft-stack Canadian enterprise: microsoft-sentinel Microsoft Sentinel in Azure Canada Central is the default at federal departments running via Shared Services Canada and at Microsoft-stack enterprise. Defender XDR integration plus CCCS-aligned deployments are the differentiator.
- Legacy Canadian Big Five bank SIEM still in renewal cycle: qradar IBM QRadar retains entrenched Big Five bank and federal positions where long-running detection rule estate and IBM relationship continue. Renewal-first, not net-new for most Canadian buyers.
How the siem software market looks in Canada
Canadian SIEM buying concentrates around three regulatory anchors: OSFI B-13 (Technology and Cyber Risk Management, in force November 2024) for federally-regulated financial institutions, CCCS ITSG-33 and ITSP.30.031 V3 for federal Protected B and Secret workloads, and PIPEDA + Quebec Law 25 for security telemetry containing employee or customer PII. AWS Canada (ca-central-1 Montreal, ca-west-1 Calgary) and Azure Canada (Canada Central Toronto, Canada East Quebec City) are the two cloud residency anchors for OSFI-regulated and federal Protected B workloads. GCP northamerica-northeast1 Montreal supports Google SecOps Canadian deployments. Demand concentrates in Toronto (banking, insurance, telco SOCs), Montreal (banking IT, aerospace, gaming) and Vancouver (SaaS, fintech).
Federal procurement runs through Shared Services Canada (SSC) and the Canadian Centre for Cyber Security (CCCS) shapes enterprise practice well beyond government — Big Five bank CISOs treat CCCS guidance as a de facto baseline. Provincial baselines (Ontario Cyber Security Centre of Excellence, Quebec ministerial directives, BC OCIO) layer on top. The Canadian-built cybersecurity ecosystem is genuinely strong in SIEM-adjacent MDR: eSentire (Waterloo/Cambridge ON) and Field Effect (Ottawa) are real Canadian-headquartered vendors that compete credibly with US MDR/SIEM at mid-market and selected regulated industries. TELUS Security operates the dominant Canadian telco-MSSP, while Mandiant Canada (Google Cloud) carries the Toronto consulting practice.
Canadian SIEM deployments must satisfy several overlapping regimes. PIPEDA covers security telemetry containing employee or customer PII; Quebec Law 25 (Loi 25) adds explicit consent, transparency and breach-notification obligations for Quebec-resident data. OSFI B-13 (Technology and Cyber Risk Management, in force November 2024) mandates security monitoring, incident response and operational resilience at federally-regulated financial institutions (FRFIs). CCCS ITSG-33 is the federal control catalogue, with ITSP.30.031 V3 covering user authentication for federal Protected B and Secret workloads. CSE (Communications Security Establishment) approvals gate classified federal use. AWS Canada (ca-central-1, ca-west-1) and Azure Canada Central + Canada East data residency are effectively mandatory for OSFI-regulated and federal Protected B workloads. SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 27017 and ISO 27018 are baseline procurement requirements. FINTRAC anti-money-laundering monitoring obligations overlap with SIEM at fintech and money-services-business buyers. CSA STAR registry coverage is increasingly requested. Provincial healthcare privacy acts (PHIPA Ontario, Quebec health information rules, Alberta HIA) govern healthcare SIEM.
Quick comparison, ranked for Canada
| Product | Best for | Starts at | 10-emp/mo* | Pricing | G2 | Geo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Splunk Enterprise Security | Mature enterprise SOC teams | Quote | - | 4.3 | Global | |
| 2 Microsoft Sentinel | Microsoft-anchored enterprise | $0 | $0 | 4.4 | Global; Azure regions | |
| 6 IBM QRadar | Traditional enterprise; IBM-anchored | Quote | - | 4.0 | Global | |
| 3 Google SecOps (Chronicle) | Google Cloud-anchored mid-market and enterprise | $0 + $6/emp | $60 | 4.5 | Global | |
| 5 Securonix | Mid-market and enterprise SOC | Quote | - | 4.4 | Global | |
| 4 Exabeam Fusion SIEM | Mid-market and enterprise SOC | Quote | - | 4.3 | Global | |
| 7 Sumo Logic Cloud SIEM | Logs-led mid-market and enterprise | Quote | - | 4.3 | Global | |
| 8 Rapid7 InsightIDR | Mid-market SOC teams | Quote | - | 4.4 | Global | |
| 9 Devo | MSSPs and high-data-volume enterprises | Quote | - | 4.5 | Global | |
| 10 LogRhythm | Traditional on-prem enterprise SOC | Quote | - | 4.0 | Global |
*10-employee monthly cost = base fee + (per-employee × 10) using the lowest published tier. For opaque-pricing vendors, no value is shown.
What buyers in Canada actually pay
Median annual deal size by employee band, in CAD. Crowdsourced from anonymized buyer disclosures.
| Product | Employee band | Median annual (CAD) | Sample | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splunk Enterprise Security | 1,000-10,000 employees | CA$625,000 | 14 | Splunk Enterprise Security plus ingest, Canadian Big Five tier, CAD |
| Microsoft Sentinel | 500-5,000 employees | CA$285,000 | 21 | Sentinel pay-per-GB ingest in Azure Canada Central, CAD |
| IBM QRadar | Big Five bank or federal department legacy | CA$715,000 | 8 | IBM QRadar enterprise renewal, Canadian financial services, CAD |
| Google SecOps (Chronicle) | 200-2,000 employees | CA$215,000 | 9 | Google SecOps SaaS, Canadian GCP Montreal tier, CAD |
| Rapid7 InsightIDR | 100-500 employees | CA$95,000 | 13 | Rapid7 InsightIDR plus MDR add-on, Canadian mid-market, CAD |
Canada-built or Canada-strong vendors worth knowing
Not yet ranked in our global top 10, but credible options for Canada buyers and worth a shortlist.
eSentire
Visit ↗Waterloo and Cambridge ON-headquartered. Genuinely Canadian-built MDR with SIEM-adjacent platform. Credible alternative to Splunk and Sentinel at Canadian mid-market and regulated industries. Strong Big Five and insurance reference base for MDR services.
Field Effect
Visit ↗Ottawa-headquartered. Covalence MDR/XDR platform built by ex-CSE and ex-CCCS engineers. Real Canadian cybersecurity vendor, particularly strong at Canadian SME, government-adjacent and defence-supply-chain buyers.
TELUS Security
Visit ↗TELUS-owned Canadian MSSP. Dominant Canadian telco-led security operations, runs Splunk, Sentinel and QRadar SOCs across Canadian enterprise and government.
Mandiant Canada (Google Cloud)
Visit ↗Toronto consulting and incident-response presence inside Google Cloud. Strong reference base at Canadian Big Five banks for IR and threat intelligence integration into Google SecOps.
All 10, ranked for Canada
Same intelligence as the global ranking, vendor trust, review patterns, verified pricing, compliance, reordered for the Canada market.
Splunk Enterprise Security
Deepest detection engineering for mature SOCs.
Splunk Enterprise Security (ES) is the SIEM with the deepest customization for mature detection engineering. The product's SPL (Search Processing Language) lets analysts write arbitrary detection logic with full programmatic control. Acquired by Cisco in March 2024 for $28B. Trade-offs: pricing among the highest in category ($150K-$5M+ annually), implementation complex (4-12 months for Fortune 500), and pricing complexity post-Cisco has eroded the category lead.
Mature SOC teams (10+ analysts) running custom detection engineering at Fortune 500 scale where SPL programmability is critical.
Mid-market without dedicated SOC, Microsoft/Google-anchored organizations (native cloud SIEM cheaper), or organizations valuing predictable pricing.
Strengths
- Deepest customization via SPL
- Battle-tested at Fortune 500 scale
- Mature partner ecosystem and certified analysts
- Strongest detection engineering capability
- Native UBA add-on (Splunk UBA)
- Cisco network/observability integration post-2024 acquisition
Weaknesses
- Pricing complexity post-Cisco; multiple pricing models still settling
- Cost predictability difficult at scale
- Implementation 4-12 months for Fortune 500
- SPL learning curve steep
- Licensing complexity (ingestion-based vs SVCs)
- Customer support flagged through Cisco transition
Pricing tiers
opaque- Splunk CloudIndustry estimate $150K-$1M annually mid-enterpriseQuote
- Splunk Enterprise (on-prem)Industry estimate $300K-$5M+ annually for Fortune 500Quote
- · Implementation $50K-$500K via certified partners
- · Splunk SOAR/Splunk UBA priced separately
- · Multi-year contracts standard
- · Ingestion overage pricing
Key features
- +Custom detection via SPL
- +Correlation searches
- +Threat intelligence integration
- +Splunk UBA (User Behavior Analytics)
- +Splunk SOAR integration
- +Cisco observability integration
- +Custom dashboards
- +Compliance reporting
Microsoft Sentinel
Cloud-native SIEM for Microsoft-anchored organizations.
Microsoft Sentinel is the cloud-native SIEM tightly integrated with the Microsoft security stack, Defender XDR, Microsoft 365, Azure AD/Entra, and Azure security services. The product's defining advantage: free ingestion tiers for Microsoft data sources, dramatically reducing total cost for organizations already on Microsoft 365 + Azure. Trade-offs: best-fit narrowed to Microsoft-anchored orgs, KQL learning curve, less customization than Splunk SPL.
Organizations already on Microsoft 365 + Azure (especially Defender XDR) wanting native SIEM at significantly lower TCO than Splunk.
Multi-cloud or AWS-primary organizations, mature SOCs needing SPL-level customization, or anyone running primarily non-Microsoft data sources.
Strengths
- Cloud-native scale on Azure
- Native integration with Defender XDR, Microsoft 365, Azure AD/Entra
- Free ingestion tiers for Microsoft data sources (huge cost saving)
- Microsoft Security Copilot AI assistant
- Mature SOAR (Sentinel Automation)
- Fits Microsoft 365 + Azure shops
Weaknesses
- Best-fit narrowed to Microsoft-anchored organizations
- KQL (Kusto Query Language) learning curve
- Less customization than Splunk SPL
- Non-Microsoft data ingestion priced normally
- Support is hit-or-miss
Pricing tiers
public- Pay-As-You-Go$2.46/GB ingested standard; Microsoft data free$0 /mo
- Commitment TiersLower per-GB rate at higher commitment$0 /mo
- · Non-Microsoft data ingestion priced normally
- · Microsoft Defender XDR priced separately
- · Multi-year commitments at higher tiers
Key features
- +Cloud-native SIEM
- +Native Defender XDR integration
- +Microsoft 365 free data ingestion
- +KQL query language
- +Microsoft Security Copilot AI
- +Sentinel Automation (SOAR)
- +Workbooks (custom dashboards)
- +300+ data connectors
IBM QRadar
Long-standing IBM enterprise SIEM with mainframe integration.
IBM QRadar is one of the longest-standing enterprise SIEM platforms. Acquired by IBM in 2011 for $1.4B. Best-fit for traditional enterprises with IBM mainframe integration needs and existing IBM Security Suite (QRadar SIEM, QRadar SOAR, QRadar XDR). Trade-offs: brand momentum has slowed, pricing high, IBM Security divestiture sale to Palo Alto Networks (announced 2024) creates uncertainty.
Traditional enterprises (banks, insurance, government) with IBM mainframe integration needs and existing IBM Security Suite footprint.
Modern cloud-native organizations (Microsoft Sentinel wins), Splunk-anchored SOCs, or anyone affected by Palo Alto acquisition uncertainty.
Strengths
- Long-standing enterprise SIEM (founded 2001)
- Tightest IBM mainframe integration
- Made for traditional enterprises (banks, government)
- Mature compliance reporting
- IBM Security Suite integration
Weaknesses
- Brand momentum slowed since IBM Security divestiture announcement
- Pricing high
- UI feels older than next-gen SIEMs
- Implementation complex
- Palo Alto acquisition (announced 2024) creates roadmap uncertainty
- Customer support flagged through transitions
Pricing tiers
opaque- On-premisesIndustry estimate $100K-$500K annuallyQuote
- On-Cloud (IBM Cloud)Industry estimate $200K-$2M+ annuallyQuote
- · IBM Security Suite licensing
- · Multi-year contracts standard
- · Implementation services
Key features
- +Events-per-second based licensing
- +Tightest IBM mainframe integration
- +Compliance reporting (PCI, HIPAA, SOX)
- +IBM Security Suite integration
- +X-Force threat intelligence
- +On-prem or cloud deployment
- +Custom dashboards
- +Threat hunting features
Google SecOps (Chronicle)
Predictable per-employee pricing with unlimited ingestion.
Google SecOps (formerly Chronicle, now part of Google Security Operations) is the cloud-native SIEM built on Google's search infrastructure. The product's defining choice: per-employee pricing instead of per-GB ingestion, which dramatically simplifies cost predictability for high-data-volume organizations. Trade-offs: best-fit narrowed to organizations comfortable with Google Cloud, smaller ecosystem than Microsoft, less mature than Splunk for custom detection.
Mid-market and enterprise organizations on or considering Google Cloud, with high data volumes where per-employee pricing dramatically beats per-GB ingestion.
Microsoft 365 / Azure shops (Sentinel wins on free Microsoft data), or organizations with mature Splunk-based detection engineering.
Strengths
- Per-employee pricing, not per-GB ingestion
- Unlimited data retention at predictable cost
- Built on Google search infrastructure (extreme scale)
- Native Mandiant threat intelligence (Google acquired 2022)
- Google Cloud security integration
- Strong AI features via Vertex AI integration
Weaknesses
- Best-fit narrowed to Google Cloud-comfortable organizations
- Smaller ecosystem than Microsoft Sentinel
- Less mature for custom detection vs Splunk
- Non-cloud-native organizations harder to onboard
- Uneven support quality
Pricing tiers
partial- StandardIndustry estimate ~$72/employee/year$0+$6 /mo +/emp
- EnterpriseIndustry estimate ~$120/employee/year with advanced features$0+$10 /mo +/emp
- Enterprise+Custom enterprise with Mandiant HuntQuote
- · Mandiant threat intel add-on
- · Implementation services
- · Multi-year commitments common
Key features
- +Per-employee pricing model
- +Unlimited data retention
- +Mandiant threat intelligence integration
- +YARA-L detection language
- +AI features via Vertex AI
- +Google Cloud security integration
- +SOAR via Chronicle
- +Pre-built parsers for 100+ sources
Securonix
Next-gen SIEM with native AI/ML for autonomous SOC.
Securonix is the next-generation SIEM with native AI/ML for autonomous SOC operations. The product converges SIEM + UEBA + SOAR + threat intelligence into a unified platform on Snowflake-based architecture. Works for organizations consolidating fragmented security tools. Trade-offs: pricing opaque, implementation complex, brand recognition lower than Splunk.
Mid-market and enterprise SOC teams (200-5,000 employees) consolidating fragmented SIEM + UEBA + SOAR + threat intel into unified platform.
Mature SOCs with existing custom detection (Splunk wins), Microsoft-anchored orgs (Sentinel cheaper), or buyers wanting transparent pricing.
Strengths
- Native AI/ML for autonomous SOC operations
- Snowflake-based architecture for scale
- Combined SIEM + UEBA + SOAR + threat intel
- Built for tool consolidation
- Modern UX
Weaknesses
- Pricing opaque
- Implementation complex (4-12 weeks)
- Brand recognition lower than Splunk
- Support inconsistency reported
- Multi-year contracts
Pricing tiers
opaque- StandardIndustry estimate $100K-$300K annuallyQuote
- EnterpriseIndustry estimate $300K-$1M+ annuallyQuote
- · Multi-year contracts standard
- · Implementation services
Key features
- +Native AI/ML detection
- +Snowflake-based architecture
- +UEBA + SIEM + SOAR unified
- +Threat intelligence integration
- +Cloud-native architecture
- +Pre-built use case packs
- +Custom dashboards
- +API for custom workflows
Exabeam Fusion SIEM
Behavioral analytics-led SIEM with native UEBA.
Exabeam built its business on UEBA (User and Entity Behavior Analytics), the platform was UEBA-first before adding SIEM capability. The result is the strongest behavioral detection in the category, particularly for insider threats and account compromise. Exabeam Fusion SIEM combines UEBA + SIEM + SOAR. Trade-offs: pricing higher than Microsoft Sentinel, brand momentum has slowed, and SIEM core (vs UEBA) less mature than Splunk.
Organizations focused on insider threat and account compromise detection where behavioral analytics outweighs SIEM core depth.
Mature SOCs running custom detection engineering (Splunk wins), Microsoft-anchored shops (Sentinel cheaper), or buyers wanting predictable pricing.
Strengths
- UEBA-first architecture; strongest behavioral detection
- Native investigation timelines (Smart Timelines)
- Insider threat and account compromise detection
- Combined SIEM + UEBA + SOAR platform
- Cloud-native architecture
Weaknesses
- Pricing higher than Microsoft Sentinel
- Brand momentum has slowed since 2023 layoffs
- SIEM core less mature than Splunk
- Support depends on tier
- Multi-year contracts standard
Pricing tiers
opaque- Fusion SIEMIndustry estimate $80K-$300K annually mid-enterpriseQuote
- EnterpriseIndustry estimate $300K-$1M+ annuallyQuote
- · Multi-year contracts standard
- · Implementation services
Key features
- +UEBA (User Entity Behavior Analytics)
- +Smart Timelines for investigations
- +Insider threat detection
- +SIEM (logs and correlation)
- +SOAR automation
- +Cloud-native architecture
- +Risk scoring
- +Pre-built use case packs
Sumo Logic Cloud SIEM
Logs-led security with cloud-native architecture.
Sumo Logic Cloud SIEM extends Sumo Logic's log analytics platform into security. Best-fit for organizations where log analytics is the broader observability need and security is one use case. Same product covered in our Top 10 APM, different evaluation framework here for security operations.
Mid-market and enterprise teams (200-5,000 employees) where log analytics is the primary observability need with security as a useful complement.
Pure-play SIEM buyers (Splunk or Microsoft Sentinel better), modern engineering-led teams, or anyone concerned about PE changes.
Strengths
- Cloud-native architecture from day one
- Log analytics heritage
- Combined observability + security use cases
- Mature high-volume log ingestion
- Pre-built security packs
Weaknesses
- SIEM less mature than Splunk
- PE-driven roadmap concerns
- Brand momentum slowed
- Customer support variable
- Pricing requires sales engagement at higher tiers
Pricing tiers
partial- Cloud SIEM EnterpriseIndustry estimate $80K-$300K annuallyQuote
- · Volume overage pricing
- · Multi-year contracts at higher tiers
Key features
- +Cloud SIEM with log analytics
- +Cloud-native architecture
- +Pre-built security packs
- +AI assistant
- +High-volume log ingestion
- +SOAR via Sumo Logic SOAR
- +Threat hunting
- +Custom dashboards
Rapid7 InsightIDR
Mid-market SIEM with native vulnerability management.
Rapid7 InsightIDR is the SIEM component of the Rapid7 Insight platform, combined with InsightVM (vulnerability management) and InsightAppSec (application security). Best-fit for mid-market security teams that want SIEM + vulnerability management on one platform without enterprise-tier complexity. Trade-offs: SIEM less customizable than Splunk, smaller ecosystem than Microsoft Sentinel.
Mid-market security teams (100-2,000 employees) wanting SIEM + vulnerability management on one platform without enterprise complexity.
Mature SOCs needing Splunk-level customization, Microsoft-anchored orgs (Sentinel cheaper), or large enterprises (Splunk or Microsoft win).
Strengths
- Combined SIEM + vulnerability management
- Strong mid-market fit (100-2,000 employees)
- Cloud-native architecture
- Public company financial transparency
- User Behavior Analytics (UBA) included
- Mature partner ecosystem
Weaknesses
- SIEM less customizable than Splunk
- Smaller ecosystem than Microsoft Sentinel
- AI features less mature than Securonix
- Support response times vary
- Best-fit ceiling around 5,000 employees
Pricing tiers
partial- InsightIDRIndustry estimate ~$5-$10/asset/monthQuote
- InsightIDR UltimateIndustry estimate $15-$25/asset/month with extended retentionQuote
- · InsightVM (vulnerability management) priced separately
- · Multi-year contracts standard
Key features
- +Cloud SIEM
- +User Behavior Analytics (UBA)
- +Endpoint detection and response
- +Threat intelligence integration
- +Combined with InsightVM (vulnerability management)
- +Pre-built detection rules
- +Investigations workflow
- +Mobile apps
Devo
Real-time analytics on petabyte-scale data.
Devo is the SIEM built for hyper-scale data, real-time analytics on petabyte-scale logs without the data tiering complexity of Splunk. Best for MSSPs and enterprises with extreme data volumes. Trade-offs: pricing opaque, brand recognition lower than Splunk, smaller ecosystem.
MSSPs and enterprises (1,000+ employees) with extreme data volumes (petabyte-scale) where Splunk's data tiering complexity is the bottleneck.
Mid-market under 500 employees, organizations without dedicated data engineering, or anyone wanting transparent pricing.
Strengths
- Real-time analytics on petabyte-scale data
- No data tiering complexity
- Right call for MSSPs and high-data-volume enterprises
- 400 days hot data retention
- Modern UX
Weaknesses
- Pricing opaque
- Brand recognition lower than Splunk
- Smaller ecosystem
- Implementation requires data architecture expertise
- Support is hit-or-miss
Pricing tiers
opaque- Devo SIEMIndustry estimate $100K-$1M+ annuallyQuote
- · Multi-year contracts standard
- · Implementation services
Key features
- +Real-time analytics
- +400 days hot data retention
- +Petabyte-scale ingestion
- +Pre-built use case packs
- +AI features
- +Custom dashboards
- +API for custom workflows
- +Multi-tenant for MSSPs
LogRhythm
On-prem legacy SIEM with co-managed services.
LogRhythm is one of the longest-standing SIEM platforms (founded 2003), known for on-premises deployment and co-managed services for resource-limited SOCs. Merged with Exabeam in 2024 to create combined SIEM + UEBA platform. Trade-offs: on-prem heritage feels older than cloud-native competitors, post-merger product roadmap settling, brand momentum slowed.
Traditional enterprises (banks, government, healthcare) requiring on-premises SIEM deployment with co-managed services for resource-limited SOCs.
Cloud-native organizations, modern SOCs (any cloud-native SIEM wins), or anyone affected by post-merger uncertainty.
Strengths
- Long-standing SIEM (founded 2003)
- On-premises deployment option
- Co-managed services for resource-limited SOCs
- Works for traditional enterprises
- Mature compliance reporting
Weaknesses
- On-prem heritage feels older than cloud-native
- Post-Exabeam merger roadmap settling
- Brand momentum slowed
- UI dated
- Uneven support quality
Pricing tiers
opaque- On-PremisesIndustry estimate $80K-$500K annuallyQuote
- CloudIndustry estimate $100K-$300K annuallyQuote
- · Co-managed services priced separately
- · Multi-year contracts standard
Key features
- +On-premises or cloud SIEM
- +Co-managed services
- +Compliance reporting
- +AI Engine for detection
- +CloudAI integration
- +Threat intelligence
- +Custom dashboards
- +SOAR integration
Frequently asked questions
The questions buyers actually ask before they sign.
Which SIEM vendors have CCCS-approved deployments for Canadian federal Protected B?
Is eSentire a credible alternative to Splunk for Canadian mid-market?
How does OSFI B-13 affect SIEM selection at Canadian FRFIs?
Splunk vs Microsoft Sentinel, which one?
How much should I budget for SIEM?
How long does SIEM implementation take?
Should I pick standalone SIEM or integrated SecOps platform?
How does SIEM pricing actually work?
What about MSSPs and co-managed SOC?
Can I evaluate via free trial?
How does AI fit into SIEM?
Final word
Looking at a different market? See the global SIEM Software ranking, or pick another country at the top of this page.
Last updated 2026-05-27. Local pricing reverified quarterly. Found something inaccurate? Tell us.