Australia verdict (TL;DR)
Verified 2026-05-24Splunk Enterprise Security dominates Aussie large enterprise SIEM at CBA, Westpac, NAB, ANZ, Telstra, Optus, Macquarie and BHP. Microsoft Sentinel has taken share rapidly through 2024-2026 at mid-market and at federal-government workloads running on Azure Australia Central. Google SecOps (Chronicle) holds a smaller but growing Aussie footprint at SaaS-native firms. Securonix and Exabeam cover the AI-led SIEM segment. QRadar holds legacy banking. Sumo Logic SIEM and Rapid7 InsightIDR cover Aussie mid-market. Devo and LogRhythm sit in the second tier. SOCI Act 2018 obligations now make SIEM a board-level conversation at critical-infrastructure operators across 11 sectors.
Picks for Australia
- CBA, NAB, Westpac, Telstra-tier Aussie enterprise SIEM at scale: splunk-es Splunk ES is the default at Big Four banks, Telstra, Optus, Macquarie and large ASX-listed enterprise. Deepest Aussie reference base, mature SOC playbooks at CyberCX and Aussie MSSPs.
- Federal-government and Microsoft-stack Aussie enterprise SIEM: microsoft-sentinel Microsoft Sentinel in Azure Australia East and Azure Australia Central is the default for Services Australia, DTA, federal agencies and Microsoft-stack enterprise. IRAP-assessed for PROTECTED.
- SaaS-native Aussie scale-ups wanting petabyte-scale SIEM: google-secops Google SecOps (Chronicle) suits Aussie SaaS firms already on Google Cloud Sydney with high-volume log requirements. AUD-friendly storage economics.
- UEBA-led Aussie SOC programs: securonix Securonix Next-Gen SIEM is the credible AI / UEBA-led pick at Aussie banks, insurers and government-adjacent SOCs replacing legacy SIEM.
- Aussie mid-market SOC running on AWS Sydney: sumologic-siem Sumo Logic Cloud SIEM is the cloud-native pick at Aussie mid-market AWS workloads, AUD-friendly versus Splunk at sub-1,000 employee scale.
- Aussie mid-market needing MDR-style integrated SIEM and SOC: rapid7-insightidr Rapid7 InsightIDR plus MDR services covers Aussie mid-market that wants integrated SIEM with bundled SOC capability rather than building it.
How the siem software market looks in Australia
Aussie SIEM is one of the most compliance-driven software categories in 2026. The Security of Critical Infrastructure (SOCI) Act 2018, as amended in 2021 and 2022, obliges critical-infrastructure operators across 11 sectors (energy, water, telco, finance, food and grocery, healthcare, transport, defence industry, higher education and research, communications, data storage and processing) to maintain a Critical Infrastructure Risk Management Program. SIEM and SOC capability sit at the centre of CIRMP. The Department of Home Affairs and the Cyber and Infrastructure Security Centre have explicit expectations on log retention, monitoring and incident response.
The Aussie SIEM vendor landscape splits cleanly. Splunk ES dominates large enterprise across CBA, Westpac, NAB, ANZ, Macquarie, Telstra, Optus, BHP, Rio Tinto, Fortescue, Coles, Woolworths, REA Group and Suncorp. Microsoft Sentinel has taken material share since 2023 at federal government (Services Australia, DTA, Defence, ATO, OAIC, ASIC, AUSTRAC) and at Microsoft-stack mid-market and enterprise running on Azure Australia East. Google SecOps has a smaller Aussie footprint but is growing at GCP-native SaaS firms. Securonix, Exabeam and Devo handle the AI / UEBA-led segment. Sumo Logic and Rapid7 sit at AWS-native and MDR-led mid-market.
The Aussie SIEM market is heavily MSSP-led. CyberCX (Sydney-headquartered) is the dominant Aussie MSSP and runs Splunk, Sentinel, Securonix, Exabeam and Google SecOps SOCs for Aussie buyers. Macquarie Government Cloud, Cipherpoint, BAE Systems Applied Intelligence and Tesserent (now ASX-listed inside CyberCX) cover the rest. AusCERT and the Joint Cyber Security Centres (JCSC) coordinate threat intelligence flow into Aussie SIEM platforms. ASD Essential Eight ML2/3 obligations push SIEM detection coverage even where SOCI does not formally apply.
Australian SIEM deployments must satisfy several overlapping regimes. The Security of Critical Infrastructure (SOCI) Act 2018 obliges critical-infrastructure operators across 11 sectors to maintain a Critical Infrastructure Risk Management Program (CIRMP) covering cyber, supply-chain, personnel and physical risks. SIEM and SOC capability are central to CIRMP. Mandatory cyber-incident reporting to the Cyber and Infrastructure Security Centre (CISC) within 12-72 hours applies for SOCI-covered entities. APRA CPS 234 (information security, effective 2019) requires regulated entities to maintain assurance over detection and response capability. CPS 230 (operational risk management, effective July 2025) extends operational resilience requirements. The ASD Essential Eight Maturity Model, mandatory for federal government and de facto for APRA and ASX-listed entities, requires monitoring and logging at ML2 and ML3. The Notifiable Data Breaches scheme requires 30-day OAIC notification for eligible breaches. Federal-government SIEM workloads require IRAP-assessed hosting (PROTECTED, SECRET); Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk Cloud Australia and Google SecOps have IRAP coverage at various levels. AUSTRAC monitoring obligations apply to financial-services SIEM. Modern Slavery Act 2018 reporting picks up vendor selection. Privacy Act APP 11 requires reasonable security including monitoring.
Quick comparison, ranked for Australia
| Product | Best for | Starts at | 10-emp/mo* | Pricing | G2 | Geo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Splunk Enterprise Security | Mature enterprise SOC teams | Quote | - | 4.3 | Global | |
| 2 Microsoft Sentinel | Microsoft-anchored enterprise | $0 | $0 | 4.4 | Global; Azure regions | |
| 3 Google SecOps (Chronicle) | Google Cloud-anchored mid-market and enterprise | $0 + $6/emp | $60 | 4.5 | Global | |
| 5 Securonix | Mid-market and enterprise SOC | Quote | - | 4.4 | Global | |
| 4 Exabeam Fusion SIEM | Mid-market and enterprise SOC | Quote | - | 4.3 | Global | |
| 7 Sumo Logic Cloud SIEM | Logs-led mid-market and enterprise | Quote | - | 4.3 | Global | |
| 8 Rapid7 InsightIDR | Mid-market SOC teams | Quote | - | 4.4 | Global | |
| 6 IBM QRadar | Traditional enterprise; IBM-anchored | Quote | - | 4.0 | Global | |
| 9 Devo | MSSPs and high-data-volume enterprises | Quote | - | 4.5 | Global | |
| 10 LogRhythm | Traditional on-prem enterprise SOC | Quote | - | 4.0 | Global |
*10-employee monthly cost = base fee + (per-employee × 10) using the lowest published tier. For opaque-pricing vendors, no value is shown.
What buyers in Australia actually pay
Median annual deal size by employee band, in AUD. Crowdsourced from anonymized buyer disclosures.
| Product | Employee band | Median annual (AUD) | Sample | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splunk Enterprise Security | 1,000-10,000 employees | A$485,000 | 18 | Splunk Enterprise Security plus ingest, Aussie big bank tier |
| Microsoft Sentinel | 500-5,000 employees | A$215,000 | 24 | Sentinel pay-per-GB ingest in Azure Australia East |
| Google SecOps (Chronicle) | 200-2,000 employees | A$165,000 | 11 | Google SecOps SaaS, Aussie GCP-native tier |
| Securonix | 500-3,000 employees | A$235,000 | 9 | Securonix UEBA SIEM, Aussie enterprise tier |
| Sumo Logic Cloud SIEM | 100-500 employees | A$85,000 | 14 | Sumo Logic Cloud SIEM, Aussie AWS-native mid-market |
| Rapid7 InsightIDR | 100-500 employees | A$72,000 | 17 | Rapid7 InsightIDR plus MDR add-on |
Australia-built or Australia-strong vendors worth knowing
Not yet ranked in our global top 10, but credible options for Australia buyers and worth a shortlist.
CyberCX
Visit ↗Sydney-headquartered, Aussie-owned MSSP and the dominant Aussie SIEM operator across Splunk, Sentinel, Securonix and Google SecOps SOCs. Major Aussie government and enterprise reference base.
Macquarie Government Cloud / Macquarie Telecom
Visit ↗Sydney-based sovereign cloud and managed-services operator. IRAP-assessed and trusted at PROTECTED federal workloads.
AUSCERT
Visit ↗University of Queensland-based Aussie CERT and threat-intelligence feed for Aussie SOCs. Free for member organisations.
BAE Systems Applied Intelligence
Visit ↗Aussie defence and critical-infrastructure MSSP serving Aussie government and large enterprise.
All 10, ranked for Australia
Same intelligence as the global ranking, vendor trust, review patterns, verified pricing, compliance, reordered for the Australia market.
Splunk Enterprise Security
Deepest detection engineering for mature SOCs.
Splunk Enterprise Security (ES) is the SIEM with the deepest customization for mature detection engineering. The product's SPL (Search Processing Language) lets analysts write arbitrary detection logic with full programmatic control. Acquired by Cisco in March 2024 for $28B. Trade-offs: pricing among the highest in category ($150K-$5M+ annually), implementation complex (4-12 months for Fortune 500), and pricing complexity post-Cisco has eroded the category lead.
Mature SOC teams (10+ analysts) running custom detection engineering at Fortune 500 scale where SPL programmability is critical.
Mid-market without dedicated SOC, Microsoft/Google-anchored organizations (native cloud SIEM cheaper), or organizations valuing predictable pricing.
Strengths
- Deepest customization via SPL
- Battle-tested at Fortune 500 scale
- Mature partner ecosystem and certified analysts
- Strongest detection engineering capability
- Native UBA add-on (Splunk UBA)
- Cisco network/observability integration post-2024 acquisition
Weaknesses
- Pricing complexity post-Cisco; multiple pricing models still settling
- Cost predictability difficult at scale
- Implementation 4-12 months for Fortune 500
- SPL learning curve steep
- Licensing complexity (ingestion-based vs SVCs)
- Customer support flagged through Cisco transition
Pricing tiers
opaque- Splunk CloudIndustry estimate $150K-$1M annually mid-enterpriseQuote
- Splunk Enterprise (on-prem)Industry estimate $300K-$5M+ annually for Fortune 500Quote
- · Implementation $50K-$500K via certified partners
- · Splunk SOAR/Splunk UBA priced separately
- · Multi-year contracts standard
- · Ingestion overage pricing
Key features
- +Custom detection via SPL
- +Correlation searches
- +Threat intelligence integration
- +Splunk UBA (User Behavior Analytics)
- +Splunk SOAR integration
- +Cisco observability integration
- +Custom dashboards
- +Compliance reporting
Microsoft Sentinel
Cloud-native SIEM for Microsoft-anchored organizations.
Microsoft Sentinel is the cloud-native SIEM tightly integrated with the Microsoft security stack, Defender XDR, Microsoft 365, Azure AD/Entra, and Azure security services. The product's defining advantage: free ingestion tiers for Microsoft data sources, dramatically reducing total cost for organizations already on Microsoft 365 + Azure. Trade-offs: best-fit narrowed to Microsoft-anchored orgs, KQL learning curve, less customization than Splunk SPL.
Organizations already on Microsoft 365 + Azure (especially Defender XDR) wanting native SIEM at significantly lower TCO than Splunk.
Multi-cloud or AWS-primary organizations, mature SOCs needing SPL-level customization, or anyone running primarily non-Microsoft data sources.
Strengths
- Cloud-native scale on Azure
- Native integration with Defender XDR, Microsoft 365, Azure AD/Entra
- Free ingestion tiers for Microsoft data sources (huge cost saving)
- Microsoft Security Copilot AI assistant
- Mature SOAR (Sentinel Automation)
- Fits Microsoft 365 + Azure shops
Weaknesses
- Best-fit narrowed to Microsoft-anchored organizations
- KQL (Kusto Query Language) learning curve
- Less customization than Splunk SPL
- Non-Microsoft data ingestion priced normally
- Support is hit-or-miss
Pricing tiers
public- Pay-As-You-Go$2.46/GB ingested standard; Microsoft data free$0 /mo
- Commitment TiersLower per-GB rate at higher commitment$0 /mo
- · Non-Microsoft data ingestion priced normally
- · Microsoft Defender XDR priced separately
- · Multi-year commitments at higher tiers
Key features
- +Cloud-native SIEM
- +Native Defender XDR integration
- +Microsoft 365 free data ingestion
- +KQL query language
- +Microsoft Security Copilot AI
- +Sentinel Automation (SOAR)
- +Workbooks (custom dashboards)
- +300+ data connectors
Google SecOps (Chronicle)
Predictable per-employee pricing with unlimited ingestion.
Google SecOps (formerly Chronicle, now part of Google Security Operations) is the cloud-native SIEM built on Google's search infrastructure. The product's defining choice: per-employee pricing instead of per-GB ingestion, which dramatically simplifies cost predictability for high-data-volume organizations. Trade-offs: best-fit narrowed to organizations comfortable with Google Cloud, smaller ecosystem than Microsoft, less mature than Splunk for custom detection.
Mid-market and enterprise organizations on or considering Google Cloud, with high data volumes where per-employee pricing dramatically beats per-GB ingestion.
Microsoft 365 / Azure shops (Sentinel wins on free Microsoft data), or organizations with mature Splunk-based detection engineering.
Strengths
- Per-employee pricing, not per-GB ingestion
- Unlimited data retention at predictable cost
- Built on Google search infrastructure (extreme scale)
- Native Mandiant threat intelligence (Google acquired 2022)
- Google Cloud security integration
- Strong AI features via Vertex AI integration
Weaknesses
- Best-fit narrowed to Google Cloud-comfortable organizations
- Smaller ecosystem than Microsoft Sentinel
- Less mature for custom detection vs Splunk
- Non-cloud-native organizations harder to onboard
- Uneven support quality
Pricing tiers
partial- StandardIndustry estimate ~$72/employee/year$0+$6 /mo +/emp
- EnterpriseIndustry estimate ~$120/employee/year with advanced features$0+$10 /mo +/emp
- Enterprise+Custom enterprise with Mandiant HuntQuote
- · Mandiant threat intel add-on
- · Implementation services
- · Multi-year commitments common
Key features
- +Per-employee pricing model
- +Unlimited data retention
- +Mandiant threat intelligence integration
- +YARA-L detection language
- +AI features via Vertex AI
- +Google Cloud security integration
- +SOAR via Chronicle
- +Pre-built parsers for 100+ sources
Securonix
Next-gen SIEM with native AI/ML for autonomous SOC.
Securonix is the next-generation SIEM with native AI/ML for autonomous SOC operations. The product converges SIEM + UEBA + SOAR + threat intelligence into a unified platform on Snowflake-based architecture. Works for organizations consolidating fragmented security tools. Trade-offs: pricing opaque, implementation complex, brand recognition lower than Splunk.
Mid-market and enterprise SOC teams (200-5,000 employees) consolidating fragmented SIEM + UEBA + SOAR + threat intel into unified platform.
Mature SOCs with existing custom detection (Splunk wins), Microsoft-anchored orgs (Sentinel cheaper), or buyers wanting transparent pricing.
Strengths
- Native AI/ML for autonomous SOC operations
- Snowflake-based architecture for scale
- Combined SIEM + UEBA + SOAR + threat intel
- Built for tool consolidation
- Modern UX
Weaknesses
- Pricing opaque
- Implementation complex (4-12 weeks)
- Brand recognition lower than Splunk
- Support inconsistency reported
- Multi-year contracts
Pricing tiers
opaque- StandardIndustry estimate $100K-$300K annuallyQuote
- EnterpriseIndustry estimate $300K-$1M+ annuallyQuote
- · Multi-year contracts standard
- · Implementation services
Key features
- +Native AI/ML detection
- +Snowflake-based architecture
- +UEBA + SIEM + SOAR unified
- +Threat intelligence integration
- +Cloud-native architecture
- +Pre-built use case packs
- +Custom dashboards
- +API for custom workflows
Exabeam Fusion SIEM
Behavioral analytics-led SIEM with native UEBA.
Exabeam built its business on UEBA (User and Entity Behavior Analytics), the platform was UEBA-first before adding SIEM capability. The result is the strongest behavioral detection in the category, particularly for insider threats and account compromise. Exabeam Fusion SIEM combines UEBA + SIEM + SOAR. Trade-offs: pricing higher than Microsoft Sentinel, brand momentum has slowed, and SIEM core (vs UEBA) less mature than Splunk.
Organizations focused on insider threat and account compromise detection where behavioral analytics outweighs SIEM core depth.
Mature SOCs running custom detection engineering (Splunk wins), Microsoft-anchored shops (Sentinel cheaper), or buyers wanting predictable pricing.
Strengths
- UEBA-first architecture; strongest behavioral detection
- Native investigation timelines (Smart Timelines)
- Insider threat and account compromise detection
- Combined SIEM + UEBA + SOAR platform
- Cloud-native architecture
Weaknesses
- Pricing higher than Microsoft Sentinel
- Brand momentum has slowed since 2023 layoffs
- SIEM core less mature than Splunk
- Support depends on tier
- Multi-year contracts standard
Pricing tiers
opaque- Fusion SIEMIndustry estimate $80K-$300K annually mid-enterpriseQuote
- EnterpriseIndustry estimate $300K-$1M+ annuallyQuote
- · Multi-year contracts standard
- · Implementation services
Key features
- +UEBA (User Entity Behavior Analytics)
- +Smart Timelines for investigations
- +Insider threat detection
- +SIEM (logs and correlation)
- +SOAR automation
- +Cloud-native architecture
- +Risk scoring
- +Pre-built use case packs
Sumo Logic Cloud SIEM
Logs-led security with cloud-native architecture.
Sumo Logic Cloud SIEM extends Sumo Logic's log analytics platform into security. Best-fit for organizations where log analytics is the broader observability need and security is one use case. Same product covered in our Top 10 APM, different evaluation framework here for security operations.
Mid-market and enterprise teams (200-5,000 employees) where log analytics is the primary observability need with security as a useful complement.
Pure-play SIEM buyers (Splunk or Microsoft Sentinel better), modern engineering-led teams, or anyone concerned about PE changes.
Strengths
- Cloud-native architecture from day one
- Log analytics heritage
- Combined observability + security use cases
- Mature high-volume log ingestion
- Pre-built security packs
Weaknesses
- SIEM less mature than Splunk
- PE-driven roadmap concerns
- Brand momentum slowed
- Customer support variable
- Pricing requires sales engagement at higher tiers
Pricing tiers
partial- Cloud SIEM EnterpriseIndustry estimate $80K-$300K annuallyQuote
- · Volume overage pricing
- · Multi-year contracts at higher tiers
Key features
- +Cloud SIEM with log analytics
- +Cloud-native architecture
- +Pre-built security packs
- +AI assistant
- +High-volume log ingestion
- +SOAR via Sumo Logic SOAR
- +Threat hunting
- +Custom dashboards
Rapid7 InsightIDR
Mid-market SIEM with native vulnerability management.
Rapid7 InsightIDR is the SIEM component of the Rapid7 Insight platform, combined with InsightVM (vulnerability management) and InsightAppSec (application security). Best-fit for mid-market security teams that want SIEM + vulnerability management on one platform without enterprise-tier complexity. Trade-offs: SIEM less customizable than Splunk, smaller ecosystem than Microsoft Sentinel.
Mid-market security teams (100-2,000 employees) wanting SIEM + vulnerability management on one platform without enterprise complexity.
Mature SOCs needing Splunk-level customization, Microsoft-anchored orgs (Sentinel cheaper), or large enterprises (Splunk or Microsoft win).
Strengths
- Combined SIEM + vulnerability management
- Strong mid-market fit (100-2,000 employees)
- Cloud-native architecture
- Public company financial transparency
- User Behavior Analytics (UBA) included
- Mature partner ecosystem
Weaknesses
- SIEM less customizable than Splunk
- Smaller ecosystem than Microsoft Sentinel
- AI features less mature than Securonix
- Support response times vary
- Best-fit ceiling around 5,000 employees
Pricing tiers
partial- InsightIDRIndustry estimate ~$5-$10/asset/monthQuote
- InsightIDR UltimateIndustry estimate $15-$25/asset/month with extended retentionQuote
- · InsightVM (vulnerability management) priced separately
- · Multi-year contracts standard
Key features
- +Cloud SIEM
- +User Behavior Analytics (UBA)
- +Endpoint detection and response
- +Threat intelligence integration
- +Combined with InsightVM (vulnerability management)
- +Pre-built detection rules
- +Investigations workflow
- +Mobile apps
IBM QRadar
Long-standing IBM enterprise SIEM with mainframe integration.
IBM QRadar is one of the longest-standing enterprise SIEM platforms. Acquired by IBM in 2011 for $1.4B. Best-fit for traditional enterprises with IBM mainframe integration needs and existing IBM Security Suite (QRadar SIEM, QRadar SOAR, QRadar XDR). Trade-offs: brand momentum has slowed, pricing high, IBM Security divestiture sale to Palo Alto Networks (announced 2024) creates uncertainty.
Traditional enterprises (banks, insurance, government) with IBM mainframe integration needs and existing IBM Security Suite footprint.
Modern cloud-native organizations (Microsoft Sentinel wins), Splunk-anchored SOCs, or anyone affected by Palo Alto acquisition uncertainty.
Strengths
- Long-standing enterprise SIEM (founded 2001)
- Tightest IBM mainframe integration
- Made for traditional enterprises (banks, government)
- Mature compliance reporting
- IBM Security Suite integration
Weaknesses
- Brand momentum slowed since IBM Security divestiture announcement
- Pricing high
- UI feels older than next-gen SIEMs
- Implementation complex
- Palo Alto acquisition (announced 2024) creates roadmap uncertainty
- Customer support flagged through transitions
Pricing tiers
opaque- On-premisesIndustry estimate $100K-$500K annuallyQuote
- On-Cloud (IBM Cloud)Industry estimate $200K-$2M+ annuallyQuote
- · IBM Security Suite licensing
- · Multi-year contracts standard
- · Implementation services
Key features
- +Events-per-second based licensing
- +Tightest IBM mainframe integration
- +Compliance reporting (PCI, HIPAA, SOX)
- +IBM Security Suite integration
- +X-Force threat intelligence
- +On-prem or cloud deployment
- +Custom dashboards
- +Threat hunting features
Devo
Real-time analytics on petabyte-scale data.
Devo is the SIEM built for hyper-scale data, real-time analytics on petabyte-scale logs without the data tiering complexity of Splunk. Best for MSSPs and enterprises with extreme data volumes. Trade-offs: pricing opaque, brand recognition lower than Splunk, smaller ecosystem.
MSSPs and enterprises (1,000+ employees) with extreme data volumes (petabyte-scale) where Splunk's data tiering complexity is the bottleneck.
Mid-market under 500 employees, organizations without dedicated data engineering, or anyone wanting transparent pricing.
Strengths
- Real-time analytics on petabyte-scale data
- No data tiering complexity
- Right call for MSSPs and high-data-volume enterprises
- 400 days hot data retention
- Modern UX
Weaknesses
- Pricing opaque
- Brand recognition lower than Splunk
- Smaller ecosystem
- Implementation requires data architecture expertise
- Support is hit-or-miss
Pricing tiers
opaque- Devo SIEMIndustry estimate $100K-$1M+ annuallyQuote
- · Multi-year contracts standard
- · Implementation services
Key features
- +Real-time analytics
- +400 days hot data retention
- +Petabyte-scale ingestion
- +Pre-built use case packs
- +AI features
- +Custom dashboards
- +API for custom workflows
- +Multi-tenant for MSSPs
LogRhythm
On-prem legacy SIEM with co-managed services.
LogRhythm is one of the longest-standing SIEM platforms (founded 2003), known for on-premises deployment and co-managed services for resource-limited SOCs. Merged with Exabeam in 2024 to create combined SIEM + UEBA platform. Trade-offs: on-prem heritage feels older than cloud-native competitors, post-merger product roadmap settling, brand momentum slowed.
Traditional enterprises (banks, government, healthcare) requiring on-premises SIEM deployment with co-managed services for resource-limited SOCs.
Cloud-native organizations, modern SOCs (any cloud-native SIEM wins), or anyone affected by post-merger uncertainty.
Strengths
- Long-standing SIEM (founded 2003)
- On-premises deployment option
- Co-managed services for resource-limited SOCs
- Works for traditional enterprises
- Mature compliance reporting
Weaknesses
- On-prem heritage feels older than cloud-native
- Post-Exabeam merger roadmap settling
- Brand momentum slowed
- UI dated
- Uneven support quality
Pricing tiers
opaque- On-PremisesIndustry estimate $80K-$500K annuallyQuote
- CloudIndustry estimate $100K-$300K annuallyQuote
- · Co-managed services priced separately
- · Multi-year contracts standard
Key features
- +On-premises or cloud SIEM
- +Co-managed services
- +Compliance reporting
- +AI Engine for detection
- +CloudAI integration
- +Threat intelligence
- +Custom dashboards
- +SOAR integration
Frequently asked questions
The questions buyers actually ask before they sign.
How does the SOCI Act 2018 affect Aussie SIEM tooling selection?
Splunk vs Sentinel for an Aussie 2,000-person bank?
Do Aussie SOCs prefer in-house or CyberCX-managed SIEM?
Does federal-government use require IRAP-assessed SIEM?
Splunk vs Microsoft Sentinel, which one?
How much should I budget for SIEM?
How long does SIEM implementation take?
Should I pick standalone SIEM or integrated SecOps platform?
How does SIEM pricing actually work?
What about MSSPs and co-managed SOC?
Can I evaluate via free trial?
How does AI fit into SIEM?
Final word
Looking at a different market? See the global SIEM Software ranking, or pick another country at the top of this page.
Last updated 2026-05-24. Local pricing reverified quarterly. Found something inaccurate? Tell us.