Skip to content
Z Zendikt
Canada edition · 10 products ranked · Verified 2026-05-27

Top 10 Marketing Attribution Software in Canada for 2026

Independent Canadian marketing attribution ranking: Dreamdata vs HockeyStack, Bizible at enterprise, AppsFlyer for mobile, CASL and Quebec Law 25 implications.

Canada verdict (TL;DR)

Verified 2026-05-27

Dreamdata and HockeyStack lead at Canadian B2B SaaS for self-serve attribution; Bizible (Adobe) and Full Circle Insights dominate enterprise Marketo-anchored stacks. AppsFlyer, Branch, Singular, and Adjust serve Canadian mobile-app marketing teams (Mistplay, TouchBistro, Tim Hortons app, Hopper). CaliberMind and Influ serve B2B sales-marketing alignment. CASL consent provenance must persist through attribution data; Quebec Law 25 PIA documentation for cross-border transfers is increasingly required at OSFI-regulated Canadian buyers.

Picks for Canada

  • Canadian B2B SaaS wanting modern self-serve attribution: dreamdata European-built B2B attribution with strong Canadian SaaS adoption. Common at Toronto/Vancouver Series B-D SaaS wanting multi-touch attribution without enterprise procurement.
  • Canadian B2B SaaS wanting product-led attribution: hockeystack Modern attribution focused on PLG funnels. Strong fit for Canadian B2B SaaS with self-serve trial-led motions.
  • Canadian enterprise on Marketo and Adobe: bizible Adobe-owned, default in Marketo-anchored Canadian enterprise marketing stacks. Used at large Canadian B2B running Adobe Experience Cloud.
  • Canadian enterprise wanting Salesforce-native attribution: full-circle-insights Salesforce-native attribution. Common at Canadian enterprises with deep Salesforce CRM and Marketing Cloud anchoring.
  • Canadian mobile-first app team: appsflyer Default Canadian mobile attribution at Mistplay, TouchBistro, Hopper, Tim Hortons app. Strong iOS post-ATT and Android coverage.
  • Canadian mobile app wanting deep linking depth: branch Strong deep-linking-anchored attribution. Common at Canadian mobile-app teams needing complex universal-link and deferred-deep-link flows.
Market context

How the marketing attribution software market looks in Canada

Canadian marketing attribution splits into three lanes. B2B SaaS attribution is dominated by Dreamdata and HockeyStack at the modern self-serve mid-market — Toronto and Vancouver Series B-D SaaS like Plooto, Vidyard, Jobber, and 1Password run these for multi-touch attribution without enterprise procurement. Bizible (Adobe) and Full Circle Insights serve Canadian enterprise B2B marketing teams anchored on Marketo or Salesforce respectively; RBC, Manulife, Telus, and similar Canadian enterprise marketing teams run one or the other.

Mobile attribution is its own category. AppsFlyer dominates the Canadian mobile-app market at Mistplay (Montreal gaming), TouchBistro (Toronto restaurant SaaS), Hopper (Montreal travel), Tim Hortons app, Shopify Shop app, and most Canadian consumer-mobile shops. Branch competes on deep-linking depth; Singular and Adjust serve specific Canadian mobile-marketing-team preferences. iOS ATT has reshaped mobile attribution since 2021, and SKAdNetwork coverage is now baseline.

B2B-specific tools CaliberMind and Influ serve Canadian sales-marketing alignment at HubSpot-anchored and Salesforce-anchored mid-market. CASL is the under-appreciated attribution constraint — consent provenance has to persist through attribution data so any CRTC audit can trace which CEMs were sent under what consent basis. Quebec Law 25 PIA documentation for cross-border transfers of Quebec residents' marketing attribution data is increasingly required at OSFI-regulated Canadian buyers (Big 5 banks running Bizible or Full Circle).

Compliance & local rules

CASL Section 6 consent records must persist through marketing attribution data. If attribution warehouses contain email engagement, ad-click, web-behaviour, or SMS interaction data linked to PII, consent provenance has to travel with the data and persist for at least three years per CRTC audit requirements. PIPEDA governs personal-information handling federally. Quebec Law 25 adds PIA for cross-border transfers of Quebec residents' attribution data, 72-hour CAI breach notification. Bill 96 requires French-language UI for Quebec-serving attribution tools. OSFI B-13 and B-10 apply to Big 5 banks using attribution — vendor SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001, concentration-risk analysis required. iOS ATT (App Tracking Transparency) since 2021 has reshaped mobile attribution; SKAdNetwork coverage is baseline. Canadian buyers increasingly request consent-mode-equivalent server-side tagging to honour PIPEDA tracking-consent obligations. Dreamdata, HockeyStack, AppsFlyer, Branch all support iOS ATT-compliant attribution; verify SKAdNetwork conversion-value-schema setup per vendor. Cookie-and-tracking-pixel consent under OPC guidance trends toward explicit consent for non-essential tracking; document consent-management-platform integration with attribution tools.

At a glance

Quick comparison, ranked for Canada

Product Best for Starts at 10-emp/mo* Pricing G2 Geo
1 Dreamdata
B2B SaaS revenue teams
$0 + $0/emp $0 4.7 Global; strongest in EU, UK, US
2 HockeyStack
B2B SaaS mid-market
$0 + $0/emp $0 4.7 Global; strongest in US, EU
3 Bizible
Marketo / Adobe-anchored B2B enterprise
Quote - 4.0 Global; strongest in US, EU, UK, AU
4 Full Circle Insights
Salesforce-anchored B2B
Quote - 4.4 Global; strongest in US, UK, AU
5 CaliberMind
RevOps-led B2B mid-market and enterprise
Quote - 4.5 Global; strongest in US
6 Influ
B2B SaaS with complex multi-stakeholder deals
$600 $600 4.5 Global; strongest in US
7 AppsFlyer
B2C mobile-first apps
$0 + $0/emp $0 4.6 Global; strongest in US, EU, APAC, Israel
8 Branch
B2C mobile apps with deep-linking needs
$0 + $0/emp $0 4.5 Global; strongest in US, EU, APAC
9 Singular
B2C marketers with mobile + web programs
Quote - 4.5 Global; strongest in US, EU, APAC
10 Adjust
B2C mobile apps
Quote - 4.4 Global; strongest in EU, US, APAC

*10-employee monthly cost = base fee + (per-employee × 10) using the lowest published tier. For opaque-pricing vendors, no value is shown.

Verified local pricing

What buyers in Canada actually pay

Median annual deal size by employee band, in CAD. Crowdsourced from anonymized buyer disclosures.

Product Employee band Median annual (CAD) Sample Notes
Dreamdata Canadian B2B SaaS mid-market CA$24,000 22 CAD Team tier annual
HockeyStack Canadian B2B SaaS CA$18,000 16 CAD Growth tier annual
Bizible Canadian enterprise Marketo-anchored CA$120,000 11 CAD Marketo Measure annual contract
Full Circle Insights Canadian enterprise SF-anchored CA$85,000 8 CAD Salesforce-native annual
AppsFlyer Canadian mobile app team CA$38,000 18 CAD Growth tier with iOS ATT and SKAN
Branch Canadian mobile deep-linking CA$28,000 12 CAD Growth tier annual
Adjust Canadian mobile gaming/consumer CA$42,000 9 CAD Business tier annual
Local challengers

Canada-built or Canada-strong vendors worth knowing

Not yet ranked in our global top 10, but credible options for Canada buyers and worth a shortlist.

AppsFlyer Canada

Visit ↗

Not Canadian-origin but the dominant mobile-attribution vendor at Canadian mobile-app teams (Mistplay Montreal, TouchBistro Toronto, Hopper Montreal, Tim Hortons app).

Dreamdata Canada

Visit ↗

Danish-built but with strong Canadian B2B SaaS adoption at Toronto/Vancouver Series B-D SaaS for multi-touch attribution.

The Canada ranking

All 10, ranked for Canada

Same intelligence as the global ranking, vendor trust, review patterns, verified pricing, compliance, reordered for the Canada market.

#1

Dreamdata

Warehouse-native B2B SaaS attribution leader.

Founded 2018 · Copenhagen, Denmark · private · 50–5,000 employees
G2 4.7 (380)
Capterra 4.6
From $0 + $0 /mo + /employee
◐ Partial disclosure
Visit Dreamdata

Dreamdata is the warehouse-native B2B SaaS attribution leader, founded 2018 in Copenhagen by ex-Trustpilot revenue and data leaders. The product covers data ingestion (CRM, warehouse, ad networks, web/product analytics, marketing automation), identity resolution at the account level, multi-touch attribution (first, last, U-shape, W-shape, custom data-driven), and closed-won pipeline reporting. Strengths: strongest B2B SaaS attribution category positioning, warehouse-native architecture (ingest from Snowflake, BigQuery, Databricks), modern UX, founder-led, deep B2B SaaS feature set tied to closed-won revenue, and strong fit for B2B SaaS revenue teams. Best fit for B2B SaaS companies (50-5,000 employees) wanting multi-touch attribution tied to revenue. Trade-offs: not a fit for mobile / B2C attribution (AppsFlyer/Branch/Singular/Adjust better), pricing has escalated as the category has matured, and implementation requires marketing operations + data engineering capacity for non-trivial setups.

Best for

B2B SaaS companies (50-5,000 employees) wanting warehouse-native multi-touch attribution tied to closed-won pipeline, particularly Snowflake/BigQuery/Databricks-anchored revenue teams.

Worst for

Mobile / B2C apps (AppsFlyer/Branch/Singular/Adjust better), Marketo-anchored teams wanting native fit (Bizible better), pure Salesforce reporting (Full Circle Insights better), or budget-conscious sub-$5M ARR with no warehouse.

Strengths

  • Warehouse-native B2B SaaS architecture (Snowflake/BigQuery/Databricks ingest)
  • Strongest B2B SaaS attribution category positioning
  • Multi-touch attribution tied to closed-won revenue
  • Modern UX and founder-led product velocity
  • Deep CRM (Salesforce/HubSpot) and marketing automation integrations
  • Built for B2B SaaS revenue teams
  • Free tier for early-stage B2B

Weaknesses

  • Not a fit for mobile / B2C attribution
  • Pricing escalated as category matured
  • Implementation requires marketing ops + data engineering for non-trivial setups
  • Support inconsistency reported post-rapid-growth phase
  • Smaller deployed base versus Bizible historical

Pricing tiers

partial
  • Free
    Up to 100K visitors, basic attribution
    $0+$0 /mo +/emp
  • Team
    ~$12K/year; mid-market entry
    $999 /mo
  • Business
    ~$30K-$80K/year typical
    Quote
  • Enterprise
    $80K-$240K+/year for larger ad spend / data volume
    Quote
Watch for
  • · Per-ad-spend tier scaling
  • · Warehouse compute costs (separate)
  • · Annual price increases of 8-12%
  • · Implementation services for Enterprise

Key features

  • +Warehouse-native ingest (Snowflake, BigQuery, Databricks, Redshift)
  • +Multi-touch attribution (first, last, U-shape, W-shape, custom data-driven)
  • +B2B identity resolution at account level
  • +CRM pipeline integration (Salesforce, HubSpot)
  • +Ad network ingest (Google, Meta, LinkedIn, TikTok)
  • +Marketing automation integration
  • +Customer journey visualization
  • +Revenue analytics + dashboarding
110+ integrations
SalesforceHubSpotSnowflakeBigQueryDatabricksMarketoGoogle AdsLinkedIn Ads
Geography
Global; strongest in EU, UK, US
#2

HockeyStack

Modern B2B mid-market attribution for B2B SaaS without warehouse.

Founded 2020 · San Francisco, CA · private · 50–1,000 employees
G2 4.7 (280)
Capterra 4.6
From $0 + $0 /mo + /employee
◐ Partial disclosure
Visit HockeyStack

HockeyStack is the modern B2B mid-market attribution platform, founded 2020. The product covers multi-touch attribution + journey analytics + revenue reporting for B2B SaaS, without requiring a warehouse for setup. Strengths: strongest B2B mid-market positioning, fast time-to-value (no warehouse required), modern UX, founder-led product velocity, AI-driven journey insights, and aggressive feature shipping cadence 2024-2026. Best fit for B2B SaaS mid-market wanting Dreamdata-class features at lower setup cost. Trade-offs: not a fit for mobile attribution, smaller integration ecosystem than Dreamdata, and customer reports of variable customer support quality during rapid scale.

Best for

B2B SaaS mid-market companies (50-1,000 employees) wanting multi-touch attribution + journey analytics with fast setup, without requiring data warehouse for value.

Worst for

Mobile / B2C apps (AppsFlyer/Branch/Singular/Adjust better), warehouse-anchored enterprises (Dreamdata better), Marketo-anchored teams (Bizible better fit), or Salesforce-only reporting (Full Circle better).

Strengths

  • Strongest B2B mid-market positioning
  • Fast time-to-value (no warehouse required)
  • Modern UX and aggressive product velocity
  • AI-driven journey insights
  • Founder-led
  • Affordable mid-market pricing
  • Strong CRM integrations (Salesforce, HubSpot)

Weaknesses

  • Not a fit for mobile attribution
  • Smaller integration ecosystem than Dreamdata
  • Support response times vary during scale-up
  • Less mature warehouse-ingest than Dreamdata
  • Brand recognition still building outside US B2B SaaS

Pricing tiers

partial
  • Free
    Limited features and visitors
    $0+$0 /mo +/emp
  • Starter
    ~$6K/year; mid-market entry
    $499 /mo
  • Growth
    ~$18K-$48K/year typical
    Quote
  • Enterprise
    $48K-$150K/year for larger volumes
    Quote
Watch for
  • · Per-visitor scaling
  • · Annual price increases
  • · Implementation services for Enterprise

Key features

  • +Multi-touch attribution (first, last, U-shape, W-shape, custom)
  • +B2B journey analytics
  • +CRM pipeline integration (Salesforce, HubSpot)
  • +Ad network ingest
  • +AI-driven journey insights
  • +Account-level identity resolution
  • +Revenue dashboards
70+ integrations
SalesforceHubSpotMarketoGoogle AdsLinkedIn AdsMeta AdsOutreach
Geography
Global; strongest in US, EU
#3

Bizible

Adobe Marketo Measure, the Marketo-anchored B2B attribution predecessor.

Founded 2011 · San Jose, CA · public · 1,000–50,000 employees
G2 4.0 (580)
Capterra 4.1
Custom quote
○ Sales call required
Visit Bizible

Bizible (now Adobe Marketo Measure) is the original B2B attribution platform, founded 2011 in Seattle. Acquired by Marketo in May 2018, then absorbed into Adobe with the Adobe acquisition of Marketo in October 2018 ($4.75B). The product covers multi-touch attribution tied to Marketo + Salesforce, with bundled positioning inside Adobe Experience Cloud / Marketo Engage. Strengths: native Marketo + Salesforce integration, default for Marketo Engage-anchored buyers, mature 14-year track record, public Adobe parent stability, and broad existing installed base. Trade-offs: post-Adobe absorption innovation pace has slowed meaningfully versus Dreamdata / HockeyStack, customer churn to category challengers reported across 2022-2025, pricing meaningful as part of Marketo Engage bundles, and the product has become an "anchored option" rather than a standalone category leader.

Best for

Marketo Engage-anchored B2B enterprises (1,000-50,000 employees) wanting native multi-touch attribution inside the Adobe Experience Cloud, particularly buyers already paying for Marketo Engage at scale.

Worst for

B2B SaaS mid-market wanting modern challenger (Dreamdata/HockeyStack better), non-Marketo shops (Dreamdata/Full Circle better), warehouse-anchored teams (Dreamdata better), or mobile attribution (any mobile vendor better).

Strengths

  • Native Marketo Engage + Salesforce integration
  • Default for Marketo-anchored buyers
  • Mature 14-year track record
  • Public Adobe parent stability
  • Broad existing installed base
  • Bundled into Adobe Experience Cloud

Weaknesses

  • Innovation pace slowed meaningfully post-Adobe absorption
  • Customer churn to Dreamdata / HockeyStack reported
  • Pricing meaningful as Marketo Engage bundle
  • Outside Marketo / Adobe ecosystem significantly less compelling
  • UX dated relative to modern challengers
  • Support is hit-or-miss post-Adobe

Pricing tiers

opaque
  • Marketo Measure (Bizible) Standard
    Bundled with Marketo Engage; ~$30K-$80K/year typical add-on
    Quote
  • Marketo Measure Enterprise
    $80K-$300K/year for larger Marketo deployments
    Quote
Watch for
  • · Marketo Engage license required for full value
  • · Implementation services
  • · Annual price increases (Adobe-typical 8-12%)
  • · Adobe consultant dependency

Key features

  • +Multi-touch attribution (first, last, U-shape, W-shape, custom)
  • +Native Marketo Engage integration
  • +Native Salesforce integration
  • +Bizible-style touchpoint capture
  • +Marketo / Adobe Experience Cloud bundling
  • +Pipeline analytics
90+ integrations
Marketo EngageSalesforceMicrosoft DynamicsAdobe AnalyticsAdobe Real-Time CDP
Geography
Global; strongest in US, EU, UK, AU
#4

Full Circle Insights

Salesforce-native B2B attribution managed package.

Founded 2011 · San Mateo, CA · private · 200–10,000 employees
G2 4.4 (280)
Capterra 4.4
Custom quote
○ Sales call required
Visit Full Circle Insights

Full Circle Insights is the Salesforce-native B2B attribution platform, founded 2011 by ex-Marketo and Salesforce alumni. The product runs as a Salesforce managed package, meaning attribution data lives inside Salesforce reports, dashboards, and objects rather than in a separate analytics product. Strengths: deepest Salesforce-native attribution architecture (managed package, not external integration), default for Salesforce-anchored teams wanting attribution inside Salesforce reports, mature 14-year track record, founder-led, and strong fit for buyers who prefer attribution to live where the pipeline lives. Best fit for Salesforce-anchored B2B teams. Trade-offs: outside Salesforce ecosystem the product is significantly less compelling, UX is dated relative to modern standalone challengers (Dreamdata, HockeyStack), and Slower roadmap than the modern alternatives. Salesforce-native architecture is also a constraint, you cannot use Full Circle without Salesforce.

Best for

Salesforce-anchored B2B teams (200-10,000 employees) wanting multi-touch attribution that lives inside Salesforce reports, dashboards, and objects rather than a separate analytics tool.

Worst for

Non-Salesforce shops (Dreamdata/HockeyStack better), HubSpot-only buyers (Dreamdata/HockeyStack better), warehouse-anchored teams (Dreamdata better), or mobile attribution.

Strengths

  • Deepest Salesforce-native attribution architecture
  • Salesforce managed package (lives inside Salesforce)
  • Default for Salesforce-anchored attribution
  • Mature 14-year track record
  • Founder-led
  • Made for buyers wanting attribution where pipeline lives

Weaknesses

  • Salesforce-only, cannot use without Salesforce
  • Outside Salesforce ecosystem significantly less compelling
  • UX dated relative to Dreamdata / HockeyStack
  • Product velocity trails newer entrants
  • Support depends on tier
  • Implementation requires Salesforce admin sophistication

Pricing tiers

opaque
  • Full Circle Funnel Metrics
    ~$30K-$60K/year typical
    Quote
  • Full Circle Campaign Attribution
    ~$50K-$120K/year
    Quote
  • Full Circle Response Management
    Add-on
    Quote
  • Full Circle Suite Enterprise
    $120K-$300K+/year for full suite
    Quote
Watch for
  • · Salesforce license required
  • · Implementation services
  • · Annual price increases
  • · Salesforce admin time for upkeep

Key features

  • +Salesforce managed package (native)
  • +Multi-touch attribution
  • +Funnel Metrics (campaign and pipeline)
  • +Response Management
  • +Salesforce report and dashboard integration
  • +Pardot / Account Engagement integration
50+ integrations
SalesforcePardot / Salesforce Marketing Cloud Account EngagementMarketo EngageHubSpotEloqua
Geography
Global; strongest in US, UK, AU
#5

CaliberMind

B2B revenue attribution + RevOps tooling combined.

Founded 2015 · Denver, CO · private · 200–5,000 employees
G2 4.5 (180)
Capterra 4.4
Custom quote
○ Sales call required
Visit CaliberMind

CaliberMind is the B2B revenue attribution platform with strong RevOps tooling, founded 2015. The product covers multi-touch attribution + B2B journey analytics + RevOps reporting (account-based pipeline analysis, ABM measurement, sales-and-marketing alignment dashboards). Strengths: strong fit for RevOps-led teams running attribution + ABM measurement combined, mature B2B revenue attribution feature set, strong CRM and Marketo integrations, and modern UX. Best fit for RevOps-led B2B mid-market and enterprise wanting one platform for attribution + ABM measurement + RevOps reporting. Trade-offs: Thinner footprint than Dreamdata / Bizible, brand recognition limited outside US RevOps community, and customer reports of variable customer support quality.

Best for

RevOps-led B2B mid-market and enterprise (200-5,000 employees) wanting combined attribution + ABM measurement + RevOps reporting in one platform.

Worst for

Mobile / B2C apps, B2B SaaS wanting fastest time-to-value (HockeyStack better), warehouse-anchored teams (Dreamdata better), or buyers wanting standalone Salesforce-native (Full Circle better).

Strengths

  • Best for RevOps-led teams
  • Combined attribution + ABM measurement + RevOps reporting
  • Mature B2B revenue attribution feature set
  • Strong CRM and Marketo integrations
  • Modern UX
  • Founder-led

Weaknesses

  • Lighter market share than Dreamdata / Bizible
  • Brand recognition limited outside US RevOps community
  • Support inconsistency reported
  • Innovation pace below Dreamdata / HockeyStack
  • Pricing opacity

Pricing tiers

opaque
  • CaliberMind Standard
    ~$24K-$60K/year typical
    Quote
  • CaliberMind Pro
    $60K-$150K/year
    Quote
  • CaliberMind Enterprise
    $150K-$400K/year
    Quote
Watch for
  • · Per-data-volume scaling
  • · Implementation services
  • · Annual price increases

Key features

  • +Multi-touch attribution
  • +B2B journey analytics
  • +ABM measurement
  • +RevOps reporting (pipeline, sales-marketing alignment)
  • +Salesforce + Marketo integration
  • +Account-based pipeline analysis
60+ integrations
SalesforceMarketoHubSpotPardot6senseDemandbase
Geography
Global; strongest in US
#6

Influ

B2B influence + person-level attribution within buying committees.

Founded 2019 · Boston, MA · private · 50–1,000 employees
G2 4.5 (80)
Capterra 4.4
From $600 /mo
◐ Partial disclosure
Visit Influ

Influ is the niche B2B attribution platform focused on individual influence within buying committees, founded 2019. The product's differentiator: rather than account-level multi-touch attribution, Influ measures person-level influence, which individuals within a buying committee (champions, blockers, decision makers) were touched by which marketing activities and how that mapped to deal outcomes. Strengths: only credible person-level B2B influence attribution, modern UX, founder-led, and strong fit for B2B SaaS with complex multi-stakeholder deals. Trade-offs: niche category, not a substitute for traditional account-level multi-touch attribution (use alongside Dreamdata/HockeyStack), small installed base, and sales-cycle-coupled value proposition limits TAM.

Best for

B2B SaaS companies (50-1,000 employees) running complex multi-stakeholder deals, typically alongside traditional account-level attribution (Dreamdata/HockeyStack) rather than replacing it.

Worst for

Mobile / B2C apps, B2B SaaS wanting only one attribution platform (Dreamdata/HockeyStack stand alone better), simple single-buyer sales motions, or low-ACV transactional sales.

Strengths

  • Only credible person-level B2B influence attribution
  • Modern UX
  • Founder-led
  • Fits complex multi-stakeholder B2B deals
  • Buying-committee influence visualization
  • Lightweight setup

Weaknesses

  • Niche category
  • Not a substitute for account-level multi-touch attribution
  • Small installed base
  • Sales-cycle-coupled value proposition limits TAM
  • Support response times vary
  • Brand recognition limited

Pricing tiers

partial
  • Influ Starter
    ~$7K/year; mid-market entry
    $600 /mo
  • Influ Pro
    ~$18K-$48K/year typical
    Quote
  • Influ Enterprise
    $48K-$120K/year
    Quote
Watch for
  • · Per-deal scaling
  • · Annual price increases
  • · Implementation services

Key features

  • +Person-level B2B influence attribution
  • +Buying-committee mapping and visualization
  • +Marketing-activity to influence-touch correlation
  • +CRM integration
  • +Champion / blocker / decision-maker tagging
30+ integrations
SalesforceHubSpotOutreachSalesloftLinkedIn
Geography
Global; strongest in US
#7

AppsFlyer

Mobile attribution market leader.

Founded 2011 · Herzliya, Israel · private · 50–500,000+ employees
G2 4.6 (1,880)
Capterra 4.5
From $0 + $0 /mo + /employee
○ Sales call required
Visit AppsFlyer

AppsFlyer is the mobile attribution market leader, founded 2011 in Herzliya, Israel. The company has raised $300M+ and was last valued at $2B+ (2020 Series D). The product covers mobile install attribution, in-app event attribution, ad-network postback handling, SKAdNetwork (SKAN) integration, fraud prevention, and creative analytics. Strengths: mobile attribution market leadership (broadest installed base across consumer apps), strongest SKAN integration in category, deep ad-network partnerships (12,000+ integrations), mature fraud prevention (Protect360), strong fit for B2C mobile-first apps, and Israel-anchored engineering depth. Best fit for B2C mobile-first apps. Trade-offs: not a fit for B2B SaaS attribution (use Dreamdata/HockeyStack), pricing has escalated meaningfully 2022-2025, post-iOS 14.5 ATT framework (June 2021) reshaped the entire category, opt-in rates collapsed to 25-35%, mandating SKAN + probabilistic + media-mix-modeling, and customer support quality reports have been mixed during the post-ATT category transition.

Best for

B2C mobile-first apps (consumer brands, gaming, fintech, retail) wanting comprehensive mobile install + in-app event attribution with SKAN integration and fraud prevention.

Worst for

B2B SaaS attribution (Dreamdata/HockeyStack better), web-only attribution (most B2B vendors better), budget-conscious indie mobile apps (Singular/Branch may fit better), or buyers needing person-level B2B attribution.

Strengths

  • Mobile attribution market leadership (broadest installed base)
  • Strongest SKAN / SKAdNetwork integration
  • Deep ad-network partnerships (12,000+ integrations)
  • Mature fraud prevention (Protect360)
  • Built for B2C mobile-first apps
  • Israel-anchored engineering depth
  • $2B+ valuation (2020), well-capitalized

Weaknesses

  • Not a fit for B2B SaaS attribution
  • Pricing escalated meaningfully 2022-2025
  • Post-ATT (iOS 14.5) reshaping reduced determinism, affects entire category
  • Customer support quality mixed during post-ATT transition
  • Implementation requires mobile SDK + ad-network postback expertise

Pricing tiers

opaque
  • AppsFlyer Zero
    Free up to limits; data ownership program
    $0+$0 /mo +/emp
  • AppsFlyer Growth
    ~$2K-$8K/month for mid-market apps
    Quote
  • AppsFlyer Enterprise
    $100K-$1M+/year for large consumer apps
    Quote
Watch for
  • · Per-conversion overages
  • · Protect360 fraud prevention add-on
  • · Data Locker (raw data export) add-on
  • · Annual price increases of 10-15%

Key features

  • +Mobile install attribution (iOS, Android)
  • +In-app event attribution
  • +SKAdNetwork (SKAN) integration
  • +Ad-network postback handling (12,000+ networks)
  • +Protect360 fraud prevention
  • +Creative analytics
  • +Privacy-Preserving Measurement (post-ATT)
  • +Cohort analysis
12000+ integrations
Google AdsMeta AdsTikTokApple Search AdsSnapchatUnity AdsAppLovinironSource
Geography
Global; strongest in US, EU, APAC, Israel
#8

Branch

Deep linking + mobile attribution.

Founded 2014 · Redwood City, CA · private · 50–500,000+ employees
G2 4.5 (880)
Capterra 4.5
From $0 + $0 /mo + /employee
○ Sales call required
Visit Branch

Branch is the deep linking + mobile attribution platform, founded 2014. The product's differentiator: best-in-class deferred deep linking (the linking infrastructure that lets a marketing link survive an app install and still land users on the right in-app destination) combined with mobile attribution. Strengths: strongest deferred deep linking in category, mature mobile attribution, broad customer base across consumer brands and gaming, IPO-track positioning (talks reported 2022-2024), and strong fit for apps prioritizing cross-platform user journeys. Best fit for B2C mobile apps wanting deep linking + attribution combined. Trade-offs: not a fit for B2B SaaS attribution (use Dreamdata/HockeyStack), AppsFlyer leads on broader ad-network integration depth, and post-ATT (June 2021) reshaping has reduced determinism across category.

Best for

B2C mobile apps (50-50,000 employees) prioritizing deferred deep linking + cross-platform user journeys with mobile attribution combined, particularly consumer brands, retail, fintech, social.

Worst for

B2B SaaS attribution, apps wanting deepest ad-network integration breadth (AppsFlyer better), apps without deep-linking needs (Singular/Adjust may be cheaper), or web-only attribution.

Strengths

  • Strongest deferred deep linking in category
  • Mature mobile attribution
  • Broad customer base across consumer brands
  • IPO-track positioning (talks reported 2022-2024)
  • Made for apps with cross-platform journeys
  • Universal Links / App Links infrastructure

Weaknesses

  • Not a fit for B2B SaaS attribution
  • AppsFlyer leads on broader ad-network depth
  • Post-ATT reshaping reduced determinism (category-wide)
  • Pricing meaningful at scale
  • Support is hit-or-miss

Pricing tiers

opaque
  • Branch Free
    Free up to limits
    $0+$0 /mo +/emp
  • Branch Pro
    ~$1K-$5K/month for mid-market apps
    Quote
  • Branch Enterprise
    $60K-$500K+/year for large consumer apps
    Quote
Watch for
  • · Per-MAU overages
  • · Implementation services
  • · Annual price increases
  • · Branch Engagement add-ons

Key features

  • +Deferred deep linking (best in category)
  • +Universal Links / App Links infrastructure
  • +Mobile install attribution
  • +In-app event attribution
  • +SKAdNetwork (SKAN) integration
  • +Cross-platform user journey tracking
  • +Web-to-app conversion
280+ integrations
Google AdsMeta AdsTikTokApple Search AdsAdjustSingularSalesforce
Geography
Global; strongest in US, EU, APAC
#9

Singular

Mobile + cross-channel attribution with creative analytics.

Founded 2014 · Palo Alto, CA · private · 200–50,000 employees
G2 4.5 (480)
Capterra 4.4
Custom quote
○ Sales call required
Visit Singular

Singular is the mobile + cross-channel attribution platform, founded 2014. The product covers mobile install attribution, in-app event attribution, web attribution, and cross-channel marketing analytics with strong creative-analytics tooling. Strengths: only mobile attribution platform with credible cross-channel (mobile + web) coverage, strong creative analytics (creative performance dashboards across networks), modern UX, and strong fit for marketers running coordinated mobile + web spend. Best fit for B2C marketers running coordinated mobile + web programs. Trade-offs: not a fit for B2B SaaS attribution, AppsFlyer leads on pure-mobile ad-network depth, and customer reports of variable customer support quality.

Best for

B2C marketers (200-50,000 employees) running coordinated mobile + web ad spend wanting cross-channel attribution with strong creative analytics, particularly gaming, retail, fintech, e-commerce.

Worst for

B2B SaaS attribution, pure-mobile apps without web component (AppsFlyer/Adjust may be deeper), or buyers prioritizing deep linking (Branch better).

Strengths

  • Only mobile attribution with credible cross-channel coverage
  • Strong creative analytics across ad networks
  • Modern UX
  • Best for coordinated mobile + web programs
  • ROI dashboards across channels
  • Mature ad-network integrations

Weaknesses

  • Not a fit for B2B SaaS attribution
  • AppsFlyer leads on pure-mobile ad-network depth
  • Uneven support quality
  • Less penetration than AppsFlyer/Adjust
  • Post-ATT reshaping reduced determinism (category-wide)

Pricing tiers

opaque
  • Singular Standard
    ~$30K-$80K/year for mid-market apps
    Quote
  • Singular Pro
    $80K-$240K/year
    Quote
  • Singular Enterprise
    $240K-$1M+/year for large brands
    Quote
Watch for
  • · Per-MAU overages
  • · Implementation services
  • · Annual price increases
  • · Cross-channel data ingestion add-ons

Key features

  • +Mobile install attribution
  • +In-app event attribution
  • +Web attribution
  • +Cross-channel marketing analytics
  • +Creative analytics (creative performance dashboards)
  • +SKAdNetwork (SKAN) integration
  • +ROI dashboards across networks
2500+ integrations
Google AdsMeta AdsTikTokApple Search AdsSnapchatUnity AdsAppLovin
Geography
Global; strongest in US, EU, APAC
#10

Adjust

AppLovin-acquired (October 2021) mobile attribution.

Founded 2012 · Berlin, Germany · public · 200–500,000+ employees
G2 4.4 (880)
Capterra 4.4
Custom quote
○ Sales call required
Visit Adjust

Adjust is the Berlin-built mobile attribution platform, founded 2012. Acquired by AppLovin in October 2021 for $1B (Adjust's estimated value at acquisition). The product covers mobile install attribution, in-app event attribution, ad-network postback handling, SKAdNetwork (SKAN) integration, fraud prevention, and audience builder. Strengths: mature mobile attribution feature set, deep European market presence (Berlin-anchored, GDPR-native), strong AppLovin integration post-acquisition, mature 13-year track record, and broad customer base. Trade-offs: post-AppLovin acquisition direction tied to AppLovin priorities (rather than independent mobile attribution leader positioning), customer reports of mixed product velocity 2022-2025, AppsFlyer leads on broader feature surface, and post-ATT (June 2021) reshaping has reduced category determinism.

Best for

B2C mobile apps (200-50,000 employees), particularly European apps wanting GDPR-native mobile attribution and AppLovin-anchored marketers wanting tight AppLovin integration.

Worst for

B2B SaaS attribution, US-only apps without AppLovin priority (AppsFlyer broader fit), buyers concerned about AppLovin priority alignment, or buyers prioritizing deep linking (Branch better).

Strengths

  • Mature mobile attribution feature set
  • Deep European market presence (Berlin-anchored, GDPR-native)
  • Strong AppLovin integration post-acquisition
  • Mature 13-year track record
  • Broad customer base
  • Strong fraud prevention

Weaknesses

  • Post-AppLovin acquisition direction tied to AppLovin priorities
  • Product velocity mixed 2022-2025
  • AppsFlyer leads on broader feature surface
  • Post-ATT reshaping reduced determinism
  • Support inconsistency reported post-acquisition

Pricing tiers

opaque
  • Adjust Standard
    ~$24K-$60K/year for mid-market apps
    Quote
  • Adjust Pro
    $60K-$200K/year
    Quote
  • Adjust Enterprise
    $200K-$800K+/year for large consumer apps
    Quote
Watch for
  • · Per-conversion overages
  • · Implementation services
  • · Annual price increases
  • · Audience Builder add-on

Key features

  • +Mobile install attribution
  • +In-app event attribution
  • +SKAdNetwork (SKAN) integration
  • +Ad-network postback handling
  • +Fraud prevention
  • +Audience Builder
  • +AppLovin integration (post-acquisition)
2000+ integrations
AppLovinGoogle AdsMeta AdsTikTokApple Search AdsUnity AdsironSource
Geography
Global; strongest in EU, US, APAC

Frequently asked questions

The questions buyers actually ask before they sign.

Dreamdata vs HockeyStack for a Canadian B2B SaaS in 2026?
Dreamdata for more mature multi-touch attribution with deeper account-level analytics — common at Canadian Series C+ SaaS. HockeyStack for product-led attribution with PLG-funnel depth — fits Canadian Series A-B PLG SaaS. Both have similar CAD pricing and Canadian B2B SaaS adoption; the differentiator is usually how PLG-heavy the funnel is.
Does CASL apply to marketing attribution data?
Indirectly. CASL governs sending CEMs, but the consent records must be auditable — if attribution data contains email engagement, ad-click data, or SMS interaction tied to PII, consent provenance has to be queryable. Many Canadian buyers maintain a consent-ledger table in the attribution warehouse that joins to PII tables on audit queries. Three-year retention is the CRTC standard.
How do iOS ATT and SKAdNetwork affect Canadian mobile attribution?
Since 2021, iOS ATT requires explicit consent before mobile attribution can track an IDFA. Canadian iOS opt-in rates have stabilised around 30-40 percent (higher than initial 2021 levels but well below pre-ATT). SKAdNetwork conversion-value schema is the substitute for opt-out users. AppsFlyer, Branch, Singular, Adjust all handle SKAdNetwork; the operational lift is conversion-value-schema design.
Where should attribution data live for an OSFI-regulated Canadian buyer?
OSFI B-13 pushes Canadian residency for production data tied to regulated banking and insurance operations. Dreamdata, HockeyStack, Bizible, AppsFlyer all store primarily in US or EU regions. Document a PIA for Quebec-residents' attribution data under Law 25, evidence vendor SOC 2 Type 2 and ISO 27001, and consider routing sensitive attribution through Canadian-residency BI infrastructure (BigQuery Montreal, Azure Canada Central).
B2B attribution vs mobile attribution, what is the actual difference?
They share a name and almost nothing else. B2B attribution (Dreamdata, HockeyStack, Bizible, Full Circle Insights, CaliberMind, Influ) measures multi-touch funnels, first-touch, last-touch, U-shape, W-shape, custom data-driven, tied to closed-won pipeline in CRM. Buyers are B2B SaaS revenue teams with 6-18 month sales cycles. Mobile attribution (AppsFlyer, Branch, Singular, Adjust) measures app installs, in-app events, and ad-network attribution at consumer scale. Buyers are B2C mobile marketers running performance ads. The tooling, pricing, integrations, SDKs, and skill sets required are different. There is no platform that does both well, pre-select which arc you need before evaluating vendors.
How did Apple ATT (iOS 14.5+) reshape mobile attribution?
Apple's App Tracking Transparency (ATT) framework launched June 2021 with iOS 14.5, apps must request explicit user permission to access the IDFA (the device identifier mobile attribution historically relied on). Opt-in rates collapsed to roughly 25-35% across the industry. SKAdNetwork (SKAN), Apple's privacy-preserving postback API, became the de-facto iOS attribution rail, with limited and aggregated data. Mobile attribution vendors had to retool: SKAN integration depth became the new differentiator, probabilistic modeling became mandatory, and media-mix-modeling techniques moved from "nice to have" to required. Google Privacy Sandbox is doing similar to Android in 2025-2026. The category is now permanently less deterministic than pre-2021.
Dreamdata vs HockeyStack, which one for B2B SaaS?
Dreamdata if you have a data warehouse (Snowflake, BigQuery, Databricks) and want warehouse-native attribution architecture with multi-touch tied to closed-won, and you have marketing operations + data engineering capacity for non-trivial setups. HockeyStack if you want fast time-to-value without a warehouse, modern UX, and Dreamdata-class features at lower setup cost, particularly mid-market B2B SaaS. Both are credible at $5M-$200M ARR. Dreamdata typically wins on warehouse-anchored enterprise and scalability; HockeyStack typically wins on time-to-value and mid-market.
AppsFlyer vs Branch vs Singular vs Adjust, which one for mobile?
AppsFlyer for default mobile attribution at consumer scale, broadest installed base, deepest SKAN integration, mature fraud prevention. Branch for apps prioritizing deferred deep linking + cross-platform user journeys (the deep linking is the differentiator). Singular for marketers running coordinated mobile + web spend wanting cross-channel attribution and creative analytics. Adjust for AppLovin-anchored marketers (post-2021 acquisition) and European apps wanting GDPR-native, though product velocity has been mixed since the AppLovin acquisition. AppsFlyer is the safe default; Branch, Singular, Adjust win on specific use cases.
Is Bizible (Adobe Marketo Measure) still a viable choice?
Only for Marketo Engage-anchored buyers who already pay for Marketo at scale. Innovation pace has slowed meaningfully since the 2018 Marketo acquisition and subsequent Adobe absorption. Customer churn to Dreamdata and HockeyStack has been reported across 2022-2025. Outside the Marketo / Adobe Experience Cloud ecosystem, the product is significantly less compelling than modern challengers. If you are not on Marketo Engage, evaluate Dreamdata, HockeyStack, or Full Circle Insights first.
How much should I budget for marketing attribution?
B2B SaaS attribution: $6K-$18K/year (HockeyStack Starter, Dreamdata free/Team, Influ Starter), $24K-$80K/year (HockeyStack Growth, Dreamdata Business, CaliberMind Standard, Influ Pro), or $80K-$300K+/year for enterprise (Dreamdata Enterprise, Bizible Enterprise, Full Circle Suite, CaliberMind Enterprise). Mobile attribution: $12K-$30K/year for sub-1M MAU apps (AppsFlyer Growth, Branch Pro), $60K-$300K/year for 1M-10M MAU apps, or $300K-$1M+/year for 10M+ MAU consumer apps. Plus engineering time for SDK integration on mobile (1-4 weeks typical) or warehouse + CRM integration on B2B (2-8 weeks typical).
How long does attribution implementation take?
B2B SaaS attribution: HockeyStack 2-4 weeks (no warehouse required); Dreamdata 4-12 weeks (warehouse-native, requires data engineering); Bizible 8-16 weeks (Marketo-coupled); Full Circle Insights 6-12 weeks (Salesforce managed package install + admin work); CaliberMind 6-12 weeks. Mobile attribution: SDK integration 1-4 weeks for new apps; ad-network postback configuration 2-6 weeks; SKAN conversion-value schema design 2-4 weeks. Plan attribution as a marketing operations + data engineering transformation, not a software install.
How does this overlap with CDP, ABM, and Marketing Automation rankings?
Attribution sits at the measurement layer alongside CDP / data + ABM / orchestration + marketing automation / activation. CDP (Top 10 Customer Data Platforms) supplies unified data, Dreamdata in particular ingests directly from warehouse-anchored CDPs (Hightouch, Census, RudderStack). ABM platforms (Top 10 ABM Platforms) supply the orchestration layer, CaliberMind in particular combines attribution + ABM measurement. Marketing automation (Top 10 Marketing Automation Software) is the activation layer, Bizible is bundled with Marketo Engage. Modern B2B stacks: CDP / warehouse → ABM + Marketing Automation → Attribution → revenue dashboards. Mobile stacks: app SDK + ad-network postbacks → attribution → analytics + retention.

Final word

Looking at a different market? See the global Marketing Attribution Software ranking, or pick another country at the top of this page.

Last updated 2026-05-27. Local pricing reverified quarterly. Found something inaccurate? Tell us.