United States verdict (TL;DR)
Verified 2026-05-19The US embedded finance and BaaS market is the deepest in the world and the most structurally disrupted. The 2023-2024 shakeout (Synapse collapse April 2024, Solid shutdown May 2024, FDIC/OCC consent orders against Cross River Bank, Blue Ridge Bank, Evolve, Choice, and Sutton) fundamentally reset the buying calculus from "which vendor integrates fastest" to "which vendor has demonstrated multi-bank-sponsor resilience and compliance-grade audit posture." Unit ($1.2B valuation, Insight Partners-backed) and Treasury Prime ($40M Series C) lead as independent BaaS platforms with multi-bank-sponsor optionality. Synctera anchors the compliance-first mid-market. Marqeta (NASDAQ:MQ) is the mature card-issuing leader. Lithic and Highnote compete for the modern API-first card-issuing segment. Stripe Issuing is the default for businesses already on Stripe. Increase is the API-first bank-rails platform for ACH, wire, and check. Bond (acquired by Visa Nov 2023) has been absorbed into Visa Direct. The US regulatory stack is the most consequential variable: OCC and FDIC sponsor-bank examinations now include BaaS vendor management as a first-order compliance obligation; sponsor bank consent orders directly impact BaaS vendor availability and pricing.
Picks for United States
- US fintech building full BaaS at scale (accounts + cards + payments + lending): Unit Multi-bank-sponsor optionality. Modern API-first developer experience. $1.2B valuation capital base. Post-2023 BaaS shakeout resilience demonstrated.
- US fintech wanting direct bank-API access with multi-sponsor diversity: Treasury Prime Direct bank-API model with 10+ sponsor banks. Compliance-first positioning. Post-Synapse regulatory standing. Lowest platform-middleman risk of any BaaS vendor.
- US fintech wanting card issuing at scale with proven enterprise references: Marqeta NASDAQ:MQ. Mature card-issuing platform. Block (Cash App), Klarna, Affirm references. Public-company financial transparency.
- US fintech wanting modern API-first card issuing without full BaaS: Lithic Modern API-first card issuing. Strong developer adoption. Lower implementation timeline than full BaaS platforms. Best for US fintech needing cards-only.
- US businesses on Stripe wanting bundled card issuing: Stripe Issuing Stripe-bundled card issuing. Zero separate integration for Stripe customers. Right for US Stripe-native SaaS and commerce wanting card controls.
- US fintech wanting API-first bank rails (ACH, wire, check) without full BaaS: Increase Modern ACH/wire/RTP/check API. Cloud-native bank rails without BaaS overhead. Developer-first pricing transparency. Best for US product teams wanting bank rails only.
- US enterprise fintech wanting advanced card controls and premium card issuing: Highnote Modern card issuing with advanced spending controls and virtual card management. Series B 2022. Best for US enterprise fintech wanting card control depth beyond Lithic.
How the embedded finance and banking-as-a-service (baas) market looks in United States
The US BaaS market in 2026 is shaped by the structural wreckage of 2023-2024. The collapse of Synapse Financial Technologies (April 2024), which left 200,000+ end-user accounts frozen amid Mercury and Evolve disputes, is the defining cautionary tale. The parallel FDIC and OCC consent orders against sponsor banks (Cross River Bank, Blue Ridge Bank, Evolve Bank and Trust, Choice Bank, Sutton Bank) established that BaaS vendor management is now a first-order sponsor-bank examination priority; sponsor banks face direct regulatory liability for BaaS vendor compliance failures.
The survivors earn their positions through multi-bank-sponsor diversity (Unit has 3+ sponsors, Treasury Prime has 10+, Synctera has multiple), compliance-grade audit infrastructure, and demonstrated regulatory resilience through the shakeout. Single-sponsor-bank BaaS platforms are now a structural liability; any BaaS vendor whose revenue is concentrated in a single sponsor bank carries meaningful concentration risk for the platforms it serves.
Marqeta's position as the public card-issuing benchmark is stable despite revenue-per-transaction margin pressure as large customers (Block, Klarna) negotiate rates. Stripe Issuing's growing US footprint reflects the power of Stripe's existing customer base: for any business already processing on Stripe, bundled card issuing with shared KYC, developer tooling, and billing is a meaningful advantage over a separate vendor relationship.
Increase is the quietest disruptor in the segment: API-first bank-rails access (ACH, wire, RTP, check) with public pricing and no BaaS overhead for businesses that need bank rails without the full embedded banking stack. Its transparent per-transaction pricing is a meaningful differentiator in a category that otherwise defaults to opaque annual contracts.
OCC/FDIC BaaS vendor management: sponsor banks operating BaaS programs are subject to OCC and FDIC examination of their fintech vendor management; BaaS vendors must be able to demonstrate compliance controls to sponsor-bank auditors; Unit, Treasury Prime, and Synctera have all supported sponsor-bank OCC/FDIC examinations. CCPA/CPRA: customer financial data processed through BaaS platforms may be sensitive personal information under CCPA/CPRA; data processing agreements, deletion rights, and California-specific disclosures required. Bank Secrecy Act (BSA): BaaS platforms must maintain AML programs, KYC/KYB processes, and suspicious activity reporting capable of satisfying FinCEN requirements via sponsor-bank BSA programs. FDIC pass-through insurance: end-customer deposits held at BaaS sponsor banks must comply with FDIC pass-through insurance rules (up to $250K per depositor per insured institution); the Synapse collapse revealed gaps in ledgering that resulted in FDIC claims being unverifiable; confirm your BaaS vendor's real-time ledgering and reconciliation posture. NACHA rules: ACH payment rails operated via BaaS platforms must comply with NACHA rules for origination, return rates, and unauthorized transaction handling. State money transmitter licenses (MTLs): if the BaaS platform's services include money transmission, MTL coverage across all US states where customers operate is required; confirm vendor MTL coverage before onboarding.
Quick comparison, ranked for United States
| Product | Best for | Starts at | 10-emp/mo* | Pricing | G2 | Geo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Unit | Modern fintech building banking products | Quote | - | 4.6 | North America | |
| 2 Treasury Prime | Modern fintech direct-bank-API | Quote | - | 4.5 | North America | |
| 3 Marqeta | Modern fintech card-issuing at scale | Quote | - | 4.3 | North America +2 | |
| 4 Lithic | Modern SMB and mid-market fintech | Quote | - | 4.7 | North America | |
| 5 Synctera | Modern fintech multi-bank diversity | Quote | - | 4.5 | North America | |
| 6 Stripe Issuing | Stripe-anchored card issuing | $0 | $0 | 4.5 | Global (Stripe-supported) | |
| 7 Highnote | Modern fintech advanced card-controls | Quote | - | 4.5 | North America | |
| 8 Increase | Modern cloud-native businesses | Quote | - | 4.6 | North America | |
| 9 Bond (Visa) | Visa-backed modern fintech | Quote | - | 4.0 | Global (Visa network) | |
| 10 Solid (status note) | Defunct | Quote | - | 2.8 | Historical: North America |
*10-employee monthly cost = base fee + (per-employee × 10) using the lowest published tier. For opaque-pricing vendors, no value is shown.
What buyers in United States actually pay
Median annual deal size by employee band, in USD. Crowdsourced from anonymized buyer disclosures.
| Product | Employee band | Median annual (USD) | Sample | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unit | US fintech (50-500 customers) | $120,000 | 24 | Per-transaction + monthly minimums; implementation $20K-$100K separately |
| Treasury Prime | US fintech (50-500 customers) | $96,000 | 18 | Per-transaction + monthly minimums; implementation $15K-$80K separately |
| Marqeta | US fintech card issuing (500K+ cards) | $480,000 | 14 | Per-transaction interchange-share model; NASDAQ:MQ |
| Lithic | US fintech card issuing (50K-500K cards) | $120,000 | 19 | Per-card + per-transaction; API-first pricing |
| Stripe Issuing | US Stripe-anchored business | $60,000 | 32 | Per-transaction pricing; bundled in Stripe contract |
| Increase | US cloud-native business (ACH/wire) | $36,000 | 22 | Per-transaction public pricing; no minimums |
United States-built or United States-strong vendors worth knowing
Not yet ranked in our global top 10, but credible options for United States buyers and worth a shortlist.
Unit
Visit ↗New York-built, $1.2B valuation (Insight Partners, 2022). Multi-bank-sponsor BaaS platform. Post-2023 shakeout resilience. Thread Bank, Pacific West Bank sponsors. The honest #1 for US fintech building banking products at scale.
Treasury Prime
Visit ↗San Francisco-built, $40M Series C (BAM Elevate, 2023). Direct bank-API model with 10+ sponsor banks. Compliance-first positioning. Post-Synapse regulatory standing. Lowest platform-middleman risk.
Increase
Visit ↗San Francisco-built. API-first bank rails (ACH, wire, RTP, check) for cloud-native US businesses. Transparent per-transaction public pricing. No BaaS overhead. The honest answer for US product teams wanting bank rails only.
All 10, ranked for United States
Same intelligence as the global ranking, vendor trust, review patterns, verified pricing, compliance, reordered for the United States market.
Unit
Modern BaaS platform with multi-bank-sponsor optionality and deep API surface.
Unit launched 2019 (founders Itai Damti, Doron Somech) and closed a $100M Series C May 2022 at $1.2B valuation led by Insight Partners. The platform serves modern fintech and SaaS companies embedding banking products (accounts, cards, payments, lending) with multi-bank-sponsor optionality (currently Thread Bank, Pacific West Bank, others) and modern API-first developer experience. Wins on multi-bank diversity (lower platform-dependency risk than Synapse-era), modern API, and post-2023 regulatory resilience. Loses on pricing complexity and capital base versus public-listed alternatives (Marqeta).
Modern fintech and SaaS companies (50-500 employees) building banking products at scale.
Pure card-issuing without full BaaS (Lithic + Stripe Issuing fit better); pre-seed startups without compliance infrastructure.
Strengths
- Multi-bank-sponsor optionality (Thread Bank, Pacific West, others)
- Modern API-first developer experience
- Comprehensive BaaS surface (accounts + cards + payments + lending)
- Post-2023 regulatory resilience demonstrated
- $1.2B valuation 2022 capital base
- Strong developer documentation and SDKs
Weaknesses
- Pricing complexity (per-transaction + monthly minimums)
- Capital base smaller than NASDAQ:MQ Marqeta
- Implementation timelines 8-16 weeks typical
- Some sponsor-bank limitations on specific products
Pricing tiers
partial- StandardPer-transaction + monthly minimumsQuote
- EnterpriseVolume pricing + custom featuresQuote
- · Sponsor-bank fees pass-through
- · Compliance services priced separately
- · Implementation services $20K-$100K typical
Key features
- +Multi-bank-sponsor architecture
- +Accounts + cards + payments + lending APIs
- +Modern developer experience with SDKs
- +KYC/KYB compliance
- +ACH/wire/check payment rails
- +Card-issuing with controls
- +Sponsor-bank diversification
- +Mature reporting and analytics
Treasury Prime
Multi-bank BaaS platform with direct bank-API integration and strong compliance focus.
Treasury Prime launched 2017 (founders Chris Dean, Jim Brusstar) and closed a $40M Series C Feb 2023 led by BAM Elevate. The platform serves modern fintech with multi-bank-API integration (currently 10+ sponsor banks) and a compliance-first positioning that proved resilient through the 2023-2024 BaaS shakeout. Wins on multi-bank diversity and post-Synapse regulatory standing. Loses on capital base versus Unit + Marqeta and US-only geographic coverage.
Modern fintech wanting direct bank-API access with multi-sponsor diversity.
EU/UK fintech (Treasury Prime US-only); pure card-issuing buyers.
Strengths
- Multi-bank-API integration (10+ sponsor banks)
- Compliance-first positioning
- Post-Synapse regulatory standing
- Strong API documentation
- Direct bank-API model reduces platform middleman risk
- Founder-led with consistent strategy
Weaknesses
- Capital base smaller than Unit and Marqeta
- US-only geographic coverage
- Pricing opacity
- Mid-market sales motion still building
Pricing tiers
opaque- StandardPer-transaction + monthly minimumsQuote
- EnterpriseCustom pricingQuote
- · Sponsor-bank fees pass-through
- · Implementation services $15K-$80K typical
Key features
- +Multi-bank-API integration (10+ sponsors)
- +Accounts + cards + payments + lending
- +Compliance-grade infrastructure
- +Modern API-first developer experience
- +ACH/wire/check payment rails
- +Card-issuing with controls
- +KYC/KYB compliance
- +Strong reporting and analytics
Marqeta
NASDAQ:MQ card-issuing leader for fintech with Block, Klarna, Affirm references.
Marqeta (NASDAQ:MQ) IPOd 2021 at $17.5B valuation and is the dominant card-issuing platform for modern fintech. Wins on Block (Cash App), Klarna, Affirm, and Uber references plus enterprise scalability. Loses on post-2021-IPO stock decline (~75% from peak), card-issuing-only focus (not full BaaS), and Block-customer revenue concentration risk (Block accounts for 70%+ of revenue).
Modern fintech and B2B SaaS scaling card-issuing programs to enterprise volume.
Full BaaS buyers (Unit + Treasury Prime + Synctera fit better); SMB fintech on tight budget.
Strengths
- NASDAQ:MQ public company with mature card-issuing platform
- Block (Cash App), Klarna, Affirm, Uber references
- Enterprise scalability for high-volume card programs
- Mature API and SDK ecosystem
- Multi-region (US + Europe + Asia-Pacific)
- Card-controls and tokenization depth
Weaknesses
- Post-2021-IPO stock decline ~75% from peak; revenue concentration in Block
- Card-issuing-only focus (not full BaaS)
- Block revenue concentration ~70%+ risk
- Pricing complexity at enterprise scale
Pricing tiers
opaque- StandardPer-transaction with volume tiersQuote
- EnterpriseCustom pricing with revenue commitsQuote
- · Per-transaction interchange share
- · Implementation services $50K-$500K typical
Key features
- +Modern card-issuing API
- +Tokenization (Apple Pay, Google Pay, Samsung Pay)
- +Card-controls (merchant restrictions, spend limits, real-time decisioning)
- +Multi-region deployment (US + Europe + APAC)
- +Mature API and SDK ecosystem
- +PCI DSS Level 1 compliance
- +Enterprise scalability
- +Card-program-management dashboard
Lithic
Modern API-first card issuing with strong developer adoption.
Lithic launched 2014 (founders Bo Jiang, Jason Kruse, originally Privacy.com) and closed a $43M Series C 2021 led by Stripes. The platform serves modern fintech with API-first card issuing and strong developer focus. Wins on developer experience and modern API surface. Loses on capital base versus Marqeta and card-issuing-only focus.
Modern SMB and mid-market fintech wanting API-first card issuing.
Enterprise card programs (Marqeta fit better); full BaaS buyers.
Strengths
- Modern API-first card issuing
- Strong developer adoption and documentation
- Privacy.com consumer brand heritage
- Affordable pricing for SMB fintech
- Founder-led with consistent strategy
- Tokenization (Apple Pay, Google Pay)
Weaknesses
- Capital base smaller than Marqeta
- Card-issuing-only focus (not full BaaS)
- Enterprise scalability still proving
- US-only geographic coverage
Pricing tiers
partial- StandardPer-transaction + monthly minimumsQuote
- EnterpriseVolume pricingQuote
- · Per-transaction interchange share
Key features
- +Modern card-issuing API
- +Tokenization (Apple Pay, Google Pay)
- +Card-controls (merchant restrictions, spend limits)
- +Developer-friendly documentation
- +PCI DSS compliance
- +Affordable SMB pricing
- +Card-program-management
- +Privacy.com consumer brand
Synctera
Multi-bank BaaS platform with strong compliance focus and post-Synapse positioning.
Synctera launched 2020 (founder Peter Hazlehurst ex-Uber Money) and closed a $33M Series A 2021 led by Lightspeed Venture Partners + Fin Capital. The platform serves modern fintech with multi-bank-sponsor optionality and a compliance-first positioning that emphasized post-Synapse-shakeout regulatory resilience. Wins on multi-bank diversity and post-2023 BaaS-shakeout positioning. Loses on capital base versus Unit and Marqeta.
Modern fintech wanting multi-bank diversity with strong compliance posture.
Pure card-issuing buyers (Marqeta + Lithic fit better); EU/UK fintech.
Strengths
- Multi-bank-sponsor optionality
- Strong compliance focus and post-Synapse positioning
- Modern API and developer documentation
- Comprehensive BaaS surface
- Founder-led with consistent strategy
- Strong Lightspeed + Fin Capital backing
Weaknesses
- Capital base smaller than Unit and Marqeta
- US-only geographic coverage
- Pricing opacity
- Sales motion still building
Pricing tiers
opaque- StandardPer-transaction + monthly minimumsQuote
- EnterpriseCustom pricingQuote
- · Sponsor-bank fees pass-through
- · Compliance services priced separately
Key features
- +Multi-bank-sponsor architecture
- +Accounts + cards + payments + lending
- +Strong compliance infrastructure
- +Modern API and SDKs
- +KYC/KYB compliance
- +ACH/wire/check payment rails
- +Card-issuing with controls
- +Strong reporting and analytics
Stripe Issuing
Stripe-bundled card issuing for existing Stripe customers.
Stripe Issuing launched 2018 within the Stripe ecosystem. The product serves existing Stripe customers wanting bundled card issuing without integrating a separate BaaS vendor. Wins on Stripe-customer-default positioning and bundled simplicity. Loses on standalone-buyer value (only fits Stripe customers) and pure-card-issuing-feature depth versus Marqeta + Lithic.
Existing Stripe customers wanting bundled card issuing without separate BaaS integration.
Pure card-issuing at enterprise scale (Marqeta + Lithic fit better); non-Stripe customers.
Strengths
- Stripe-bundled card issuing for existing Stripe customers
- Modern API consistent with broader Stripe ecosystem
- Tokenization (Apple Pay, Google Pay)
- Strong developer experience
- Affordable for low-volume programs
- Multi-region support
Weaknesses
- Standalone-buyer value weak; only fits Stripe customers
- Pure-card-issuing-feature depth versus Marqeta + Lithic lower
- Card-control depth less than dedicated platforms
- Sponsor-bank model less transparent
Pricing tiers
public- StandardPer-transaction fees; volume tiers$0 /mo
- · Per-transaction interchange share
- · Card-program-management fees
Key features
- +Stripe-bundled card issuing
- +Modern API consistent with Stripe ecosystem
- +Tokenization (Apple Pay, Google Pay)
- +Card-controls (basic)
- +Multi-region support
- +Strong developer experience
- +Affordable for low-volume programs
- +Integration with broader Stripe payments + billing
Highnote
Modern card-issuing with advanced controls; Series B 2022.
Highnote launched 2020 (founder John MacIlwaine ex-Marqeta) and closed a $54M Series B Apr 2022 led by Adams Street Partners + Oak HC/FT. The platform serves modern fintech with card-issuing + advanced controls + commercial-card support. Wins on advanced card-controls and founder pedigree from Marqeta. Loses on capital base and brand mindshare versus Marqeta + Lithic.
Modern fintech wanting card-issuing with advanced controls and commercial-card support.
Enterprise card programs (Marqeta fit better); SMB on tight budget (Lithic + Stripe Issuing fit better).
Strengths
- Modern card-issuing with advanced controls
- Founder pedigree from Marqeta (John MacIlwaine)
- Commercial-card support
- Strong developer documentation
- Tokenization (Apple Pay, Google Pay)
- Series B-funded with healthy runway
Weaknesses
- Capital base smaller than Marqeta
- Brand mindshare versus Marqeta + Lithic lower
- Smaller installed base
- US-only geographic coverage
Pricing tiers
partial- StandardPer-transaction + monthly minimumsQuote
- EnterpriseVolume pricingQuote
- · Per-transaction interchange share
- · Implementation services priced separately
Key features
- +Modern card-issuing API
- +Advanced card-controls (real-time decisioning)
- +Commercial-card support
- +Tokenization (Apple Pay, Google Pay)
- +Strong developer documentation
- +PCI DSS compliance
- +Card-program-management
- +Multi-tenant support
Increase
Modern API-first bank-rails platform for cloud-native businesses.
Increase launched 2020 (founder Garrett Koonce ex-Stripe) and closed a Series A 2021 led by Box Group. The platform serves modern cloud-native businesses with modern API-first ACH/wire/check rails. Wins on modern developer experience and direct bank-API model. Loses on capital base and pure-card-issuing absence (specializes in payment rails, not cards).
Modern cloud-native businesses wanting API-first bank-rails platform.
Card-issuing buyers (Marqeta + Lithic + Stripe Issuing fit better); EU/UK businesses.
Strengths
- Modern API-first bank-rails platform
- ACH/wire/check + RTP payment rails
- Modern developer experience
- Founder pedigree from Stripe
- Strong API documentation
- Compliance focus
Weaknesses
- Pure-card-issuing absent (specializes in rails not cards)
- Capital base smaller than peers
- Brand mindshare in BaaS procurement defaults lower
- US-only geographic coverage
Pricing tiers
partial- StandardPer-transaction with volume tiersQuote
- · Per-transaction fees on ACH/wire/check
- · Sponsor-bank fees pass-through
Key features
- +Modern API-first bank rails
- +ACH/wire/check + RTP payment rails
- +Strong developer documentation
- +Compliance focus
- +Direct bank-API model
- +Real-time payment monitoring
- +Sandbox environment for development
- +Webhooks and event streaming
Bond (Visa)
Visa-acquired BaaS platform; post-acquisition integration in progress.
Bond was founded 2019 and acquired by Visa November 2023 (terms undisclosed). The platform serves modern fintech with BaaS infrastructure and is being integrated into Visa Direct + Visa Embedded Solutions. Wins on Visa-backing post-acquisition. Loses on post-acquisition integration uncertainty and customer-disclosure friction during the integration phase.
Modern fintech wanting Visa-backed BaaS with global network access.
Buyers wary of post-acquisition trajectory; Unit + Treasury Prime + Synctera offer more clarity.
Strengths
- Visa-backing post-November 2023 acquisition
- Multi-bank-sponsor optionality
- Modern API and SDKs
- Comprehensive BaaS surface
- Integration with Visa Direct + Visa Embedded Solutions in progress
- Global Visa network access
Weaknesses
- Post-acquisition integration uncertainty
- Customer-disclosure friction during integration phase
- Roadmap uncertain pending Visa product strategy
- Bond brand may be retired
Pricing tiers
opaque- StandardPer-transaction + monthly minimumsQuote
- Visa Embedded SolutionsCustom pricingQuote
- · Visa network fees
- · Implementation services priced separately
Key features
- +BaaS infrastructure
- +Multi-bank-sponsor optionality
- +Visa Direct integration
- +Visa Embedded Solutions roadmap
- +Modern API and SDKs
- +KYC/KYB compliance
- +Card-issuing with controls
- +Global Visa network access
Solid (status note)
Defunct as of May 2024 post-FDIC consent order; included for historical context.
Solid (formerly Wise) launched 2018 and shut down operations May 2024 following FDIC consent orders against its sponsor banks (Evolve Bank and Trust) and downstream regulatory pressure. Customers were migrated to alternative BaaS providers (Unit, Treasury Prime, Synctera). We include Solid here for historical context: it illustrates the 2023-2024 BaaS shakeout that reshaped the category. Buyers evaluating BaaS in 2026 should treat the Solid collapse as a structural case study in sponsor-bank-concentration risk.
Historical reference only; do not select Solid for new deployments.
New buyers (Unit + Treasury Prime + Synctera + Marqeta fit; Solid is not available).
Strengths
- Historical case study in BaaS risks
- Modern API and developer experience (when operating)
- Founder-led pre-shutdown
Weaknesses
- Defunct as of May 2024; do not buy
- Sponsor-bank-concentration risk realized
- Customer migrations to Unit + Treasury Prime + Synctera ongoing
- Brand and assets effectively wound down
Pricing tiers
opaque- N/AService discontinued May 2024Quote
- · N/A
Key features
- +Historical: modern API-first BaaS
- +Historical: card-issuing + accounts + payments
- +Service discontinued May 2024
Frequently asked questions
The questions buyers actually ask before they sign.
What should I check about a BaaS vendor's sponsor-bank relationships after the Synapse collapse?
Unit vs Treasury Prime: which US BaaS platform should we choose?
Should I use Stripe Issuing or Lithic for US card issuing?
What is BaaS and why does sponsor-bank diversity matter?
What happened to Synapse and Solid?
Unit vs Treasury Prime vs Synctera, which one wins?
How much should I budget for BaaS software?
What is the FDIC/OCC consent order context?
What does stablecoin integration mean for BaaS?
Card-issuing only vs full BaaS, which fits when?
How long does BaaS implementation take?
What about KYC and KYB compliance vendors?
Is there an EU equivalent to US BaaS platforms?
Final word
Looking at a different market? See the global Embedded Finance and Banking-as-a-Service (BaaS) ranking, or pick another country at the top of this page.
Last updated 2026-05-19. Local pricing reverified quarterly. Found something inaccurate? Tell us.