Skip to content
Z Zendikt
Vendor trust scorecard

Wootric (InMoment) vendor trust score

Trust scoring is the “is this vendor a fair counterparty” question, deliberately separated from product quality. Six dimensions, dated, sourced where events warrant it.

6.1
/10
cautious
Verdict

Wootric (InMoment)'s vendor trust profile warrants caution. Below-average dimensions need explicit mitigation language in the contract.

Vendor Trust Score

Is Wootric (InMoment) a trustworthy vendor?

6.1/10
Mixed
Pricing transparency
Published rates; no hidden fees
4.5
Contract fairness
Reasonable terms; no auto-renew traps
6.5
Incident response
How they handle outages and breaches
7.5
Post-acquisition behavior
Customer treatment after M&A or PE
5.5
Executive stability
Leadership churn over 24 months
6.5
Roadmap honesty
Public commitments held
6.0
Trust signal log
  • 2019-05-22
    InMoment acquired Wootric for an undisclosed amount
  • 2021-04-22
    Wootric integrated into the InMoment XI Platform
  • 2023-04-22
    Standalone Wootric brand visibility reduced, sales pushed toward InMoment XI bundle
  • 2024-09-22
    InMoment AI Spotlight extended to Wootric NPS responses
  • 2025-04-22
    Mid-enterprise buyers reported 8-15% renewal escalations under Madison Dearborn ownership
Vendor Trust is scored independently of product quality. A great product from an unfair vendor still earns a low trust score.

How to read this score

  • Trust is separate from product quality. A vendor can ship great software and treat customers badly — or vice versa. We score the two independently.
  • 8.0+/10: strong. Few concerns at renewal or procurement.
  • 6.5–7.9: mixed. Negotiate hard on the lowest dimensions; monitor across the contract term.
  • 5.0–6.4: cautious. Add explicit mitigation language to the master agreement.
  • Below 5.0: concerning. Treat this as a contracted-risk evaluation, not a product-fit evaluation.
  • Updates: we re-verify scoring quarterly. Material trust events (acquisitions, breaches, leadership change, hostile contract terms) get logged on the timeline above.

Related editorial

Last updated 2026-05-10. Scoring methodology: editorial standards. Disagree? Tell us.