Australia verdict (TL;DR)
Verified 2026-05-24Australian FP&A software is dominated by Anaplan at ASX 200 large enterprise, Workday Adaptive Planning at Workday HCM-anchored buyers, and Vena and Cube at modern Australian mid-market. Pigment is gaining share at Australian SaaS scale-ups (Canva, Atlassian-trajectory). Workiva sits at the close-and-disclosure overlap. ASX continuous disclosure, AASB IFRS standards, half-year and full-year reporting cycles, and the rolling-forecast culture at large Australian enterprises (banks, miners, telcos, retail) drive FP&A adoption. APRA-regulated entities have additional CPS 234 information security and stress-testing requirements.
Picks for Australia
- ASX 100 large enterprise rolling-forecast and scenario planning: anaplan Default at ASX 100 (CBA, Westpac, ANZ, NAB, Telstra, Woolworths, Coles). Strong Australian Anaplan partner ecosystem (Accenture, Deloitte, Spaulding Ridge ANZ). Used for rolling forecasts, headcount planning, supply-chain planning, financial consolidation.
- Workday HCM enterprise wanting unified planning (1,000-5,000 employees): workday-adaptive-planning Native Workday HCM and Financials integration. Default for Australian Workday-anchored enterprises (Westpac, Telstra, REA Group-tier). AUD via Workday Australia.
- Australian SaaS scale-up high-growth planning: pigment Modern UX, real-time collaboration, used at Australian SaaS scale-ups (Canva, Atlassian-trajectory) for headcount, hiring plan, revenue planning, board reporting.
- Australian mid-market FP&A (200-2,000 employees) Excel-friendly: vena Excel-native interface, strong NetSuite and Microsoft Dynamics integration. Strong fit for Australian mid-market wanting to scale up from spreadsheet planning.
- Australian SaaS and services mid-market modern FP&A (50-500 employees): cube Modern cloud-native FP&A with strong NetSuite, QuickBooks Online, Xero integration. Lower TCO than Anaplan or Adaptive at this size.
- ASX-listed entity wanting close + planning + disclosure: workiva Workiva Wdesk for half-year, full-year, ASRS climate disclosure, and budget vs actuals reporting. Strong fit when finance team wants one platform for close and planning narrative.
How the fp&a (financial planning & analysis) software market looks in Australia
Australian FP&A software buying is concentrated at ASX 200 and large unlisted enterprise. Anaplan is the dominant Australian large-enterprise FP&A platform with a strong Australian partner ecosystem (Accenture, Deloitte, Spaulding Ridge ANZ, EY Australia). CBA, Westpac, ANZ, NAB, Telstra, Optus, Woolworths, Coles, BHP, Rio Tinto, Macquarie, AMP have all used Anaplan at significant scale. The buying motion is CFO-led with FP&A and corporate-strategy team sponsorship; deployment typically runs 6-18 months with partner-led implementation.
Workday Adaptive Planning is the second tier, dominant at Australian Workday HCM-anchored enterprises (Westpac, Telstra, REA Group, large retail). Pigment is gaining share at Australian SaaS scale-ups (Canva, Atlassian-trajectory) where the modern UX and collaborative model matter more than Anaplan-style breadth. Vena holds Australian mid-market Excel-friendly buyers. Cube and Mosaic compete for modern Australian SaaS and services mid-market. Datarails and Jirav cover Australian SMB.
The Australian rolling-forecast culture matters. Most ASX 200 entities run rolling 12-18 month forecasts updated monthly or quarterly, plus the annual budget cycle. APRA-regulated entities (banks, super funds, insurers) have additional stress-testing requirements (APRA Common Reporting, ARS prudential stress tests, ICAAP) that FP&A software supports. AASB IFRS standards (AASB 15 revenue, AASB 16 leases, AASB 9 financial instruments) intersect with FP&A in revenue forecasting, lease commitment forecasting, and ECL modeling.
Compliance: AASB IFRS standards. ASX continuous disclosure under Listing Rule 3.1. ASIC enforcement on forward-looking statements and forecasts. APRA CPS 234 and CPS 230 for regulated entities. Modern Slavery Act 2018 for A$100M+ entities. Privacy Act 1988 and APP. Data residency: Anaplan, Workday Adaptive, Pigment, Workiva, Vena offer Australia East / AWS Sydney; some EU residency available.
AASB IFRS standards drive FP&A complexity: AASB 15 revenue recognition (performance-obligation forecasting), AASB 16 leases (lease-commitment and right-of-use asset forecasting), AASB 9 financial instruments (ECL forecasting at banks and lenders). ASX Listing Rule 3.1 continuous disclosure requires immediate disclosure of price-sensitive information; forward-looking statements in investor communications must be supported by documented FP&A assumptions and methodology. ASIC enforcement on forward-looking statements; ASIC RG 170 (prospective financial information) provides guidance on forecasts and projections in disclosure documents. APRA CPS 234 information security obligations for APRA-regulated entities; CPS 230 from July 2025 adds operational risk management. APRA stress-testing requirements: ICAAP (Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process) for banks, super-fund stress testing, life and general insurer capital adequacy. APRA Connect reporting deadlines. Modern Slavery Act 2018 for A$100M+ entities. AASB S2 climate-related disclosure phased mandatory from 1 July 2024 affects long-term financial planning (transition scenario analysis, 1.5C and 2C alignment). Privacy Act 1988 and APP for employee personal information in headcount and compensation planning modules; APP 11 reasonable security; encrypted at rest standard. Data residency: most major vendors offer Australia East.
Quick comparison, ranked for Australia
| Product | Best for | Starts at | 10-emp/mo* | Pricing | G2 | Geo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Anaplan | Large enterprises with complex planning | Quote | - | 4.4 | Global; enterprise-grade | |
| 2 Workday Adaptive Planning | Workday HCM customers | Quote | - | 4.4 | Global; enterprise-grade | |
| 4 Pigment | Tech-forward mid-market | Quote | - | 4.7 | Global; strongest in EU, US, UK | |
| 3 Vena | Excel-anchored mid-market finance teams | Quote | - | 4.5 | Global; strongest in US, Canada, UK | |
| 7 Cube | Hands-off mid-market finance teams | $1500 | $1500 | 4.7 | Global; strongest in US | |
| 8 Workiva | Public companies and audit-heavy industries | Quote | - | 4.6 | Global; enterprise-grade | |
| 10 Planful | Upper mid-market | Quote | - | 4.4 | Global; strongest in US | |
| 5 Datarails | Mid-market value buyers | Quote | - | 4.6 | Global; strongest in US, UK, EU | |
| 6 Mosaic | Venture-backed SaaS | Quote | - | 4.7 | Global; strongest in US, EU, UK | |
| 9 Jirav | SMBs and venture-backed early-stage | $750 | $750 | 4.5 | Global; strongest in US |
*10-employee monthly cost = base fee + (per-employee × 10) using the lowest published tier. For opaque-pricing vendors, no value is shown.
What buyers in Australia actually pay
Median annual deal size by employee band, in AUD. Crowdsourced from anonymized buyer disclosures.
| Product | Employee band | Median annual (AUD) | Sample | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anaplan | ASX 100 large enterprise | A$720,000 | 22 | Anaplan + AU partner implementation; AUD via Anaplan ANZ |
| Anaplan | ASX 200 mid-large (1,000-5,000 employees) | A$240,000 | 38 | Anaplan with smaller workspace footprint; AUD |
| Workday Adaptive Planning | Workday HCM enterprise (1,000-5,000 employees) | A$312,000 | 22 | Workday Adaptive + AU implementation; AUD via Workday Australia |
| Pigment | Australian SaaS scale-up (100-1,000 employees) | A$156,000 | 18 | Pigment Premium + AU implementation; AUD via reseller |
| Vena | Australian mid-market (200-1,000 employees) | A$96,000 | 22 | Vena Pro + AU partner; AUD |
| Cube | Australian SaaS or services (50-500 employees) | A$60,000 | 14 | Cube Pro; AUD |
| Planful | Australian mid-market (200-1,000 employees) | A$108,000 | 11 | Planful Premium; AUD via reseller |
| Workiva | ASX 200 entity | A$192,000 | 18 | Workiva Platform + Close + Disclosure; AUD via Workiva ANZ |
Australia-built or Australia-strong vendors worth knowing
Not yet ranked in our global top 10, but credible options for Australia buyers and worth a shortlist.
Spaulding Ridge ANZ
Visit ↗Sydney-based Anaplan, Workday, Salesforce partner. The dominant Australian Anaplan implementation partner alongside Accenture and Deloitte. Strong ASX 100 customer base.
CFO Centre Australia
Visit ↗Australian fractional CFO network. Drives FP&A software adoption at Australian mid-market via fractional CFO engagements; often standardises on Vena, Cube, or Datarails for client portfolio.
Mantel Group Finance Transformation
Visit ↗Melbourne-based technology consultancy with growing finance-transformation practice. Builds custom planning data pipelines on Snowflake or Databricks layered with Anaplan, Adaptive, or Pigment.
Global picks that don't fit here
- MosaicMosaic has limited Australian footprint at mid-market and enterprise. Cube, Vena, or Pigment are stronger Australian options for similar segments.
- JiravJirav is narrower at Australian SMB. Datarails, Cube, or Xero-native budgeting tools are stronger Australian SMB choices.
- DatarailsDatarails has limited Australian sales presence. Australian Excel-friendly mid-market buyers should evaluate Vena first.
All 10, ranked for Australia
Same intelligence as the global ranking, vendor trust, review patterns, verified pricing, compliance, reordered for the Australia market.
Anaplan
Enterprise FP&A market leader with Hyperblock engine.
Anaplan is the enterprise FP&A market leader, founded 2006. The company was public 2018-2022, then taken private by Thoma Bravo for $10.7B. The product is anchored on the Hyperblock in-memory engine, which enables complex multi-dimensional planning across finance, sales, supply chain, and HR. Strengths: most flexible planning model in category, deepest enterprise customer base, Connected Planning approach (FP&A + Sales Performance + Supply Chain in one platform). Best fit for enterprises ($1B+ revenue) with complex multi-dimensional planning needs. Trade-offs: post-Thoma Bravo product velocity has slowed, pricing escalated meaningfully, model-builder skill scarcity (Anaplan modeler certification is a real bottleneck), and implementation complex (typically 6-18 months).
Large enterprises ($1B+ revenue, 1,000+ employees) with complex multi-dimensional planning across finance, sales, supply chain, and HR.
Mid-market wanting modern UX (Pigment/Vena better), SaaS-anchored mid-market (Mosaic better fit), or budget-conscious buyers (Cube/Datarails cheaper).
Strengths
- Hyperblock in-memory engine for complex planning
- Most flexible planning model in category
- Deepest enterprise customer base (2,400+ customers)
- Connected Planning across functions
- Works for $1B+ revenue enterprises
- Mature partner ecosystem
Weaknesses
- Post-Thoma Bravo product velocity slowed
- Pricing escalated meaningfully
- Anaplan modeler skill scarcity
- Implementation complex (6-18 months)
- Customer reports of declining customer support post-Thoma Bravo
- UX dated relative to modern challengers (Pigment)
Pricing tiers
opaque- Anaplan Standard~$50K-$200K/year typicalQuote
- Anaplan Pro$200K-$500K/yearQuote
- Anaplan Enterprise$500K-$2M+/year for large enterprisesQuote
- · Implementation services ($100K-$2M+)
- · Per-user scaling at upper enterprise
- · Annual price increases of 8-12%
- · Anaplan modeler training fees
Key features
- +Hyperblock in-memory planning engine
- +Connected Planning (FP&A + Sales + Supply Chain)
- +Multi-dimensional modeling
- +Workflow + collaboration
- +Mobile apps
- +300+ integrations
Workday Adaptive Planning
Default FP&A for Workday HCM customers.
Workday Adaptive Planning (formerly Adaptive Insights, acquired by Workday in 2018 for $1.55B) is the FP&A module of the Workday platform. The product covers planning + budgeting + forecasting + reporting with native Workday HCM integration. Strengths: native Workday HCM integration (single source of truth for headcount + comp planning), strong fit for headcount-heavy planning, modern UX, and Workday public company stability. Best fit for Workday HCM customers wanting integrated FP&A without separate vendor relationship. Trade-offs: outside Workday ecosystem the product is significantly less compelling, pricing meaningful when bundled with Workday platform, and complex modeling capabilities below Anaplan.
Workday HCM customers (1,000-100,000+ employees) wanting unified HR + FP&A with native headcount + comp planning.
Anyone not on Workday HCM (Anaplan/Vena/Pigment better), buyers needing deepest multi-dimensional planning (Anaplan better), or SMBs (Jirav cheaper).
Strengths
- Native Workday HCM integration
- Single source of truth for headcount + comp planning
- Modern UX (relative to legacy FP&A)
- Public Workday parent stability
- Built for headcount-heavy planning
- Mature SaaS metrics for SaaS companies
Weaknesses
- Outside Workday ecosystem significantly less compelling
- Pricing meaningful when bundled
- Complex modeling below Anaplan
- Implementation 4-9 months
- Less suited for non-finance planning use cases (Anaplan better)
Pricing tiers
opaque- Workday Adaptive PlanningBundled with Workday platform; ~$50K-$300K/year typicalQuote
- Workday Adaptive Planning Enterprise$300K-$1M+/year for large enterprisesQuote
- · Workday platform license required
- · Implementation fees
- · Annual price increases
Key features
- +Cloud-native FP&A platform
- +Native Workday HCM integration
- +Headcount + comp planning
- +Sales + revenue planning
- +Modern UX
- +200+ integrations
Pigment
Modern AI-first FP&A with aggressive product velocity.
Pigment is the modern AI-first FP&A challenger, founded 2019 in Paris. Last valued $2B+ (2024 Series D). The product covers planning + reporting + scenario modeling with modern UX and AI-driven features. Strengths: aggressive product velocity, AI-driven scenario modeling (Pigment AI), modern UX, founder-led, and strong fit for modern mid-market. Best fit for engineering-led mid-market ($50M-$500M revenue) wanting modern AI-first FP&A. Trade-offs: enterprise depth still catching up to Anaplan, Support is hit-or-miss, and methodology not as proven as Anaplan/Vena (newer product).
Tech-forward mid-market organizations ($50M-$500M revenue) wanting modern AI-first FP&A with aggressive product velocity.
Large enterprise needing proven scale (Anaplan better), Excel-anchored finance teams (Vena better fit), or SMBs (Cube/Datarails cheaper).
Strengths
- Aggressive product velocity
- AI-driven scenario modeling (Pigment AI)
- Modern UX
- Founder-led
- Best for tech-led mid-market
- European-built (GDPR-native)
Weaknesses
- Enterprise depth still catching up to Anaplan
- Uneven support quality
- Methodology newer than Anaplan/Vena
- Smaller installed base
- Less proven at $1B+ revenue scale
Pricing tiers
opaque- Pigment Standard~$30K-$80K/year typicalQuote
- Pigment Pro$80K-$200K/yearQuote
- Pigment Enterprise$200K-$500K+/yearQuote
- · Implementation fees
- · Per-user scaling
- · Annual price increases
Key features
- +Modern AI-first FP&A
- +Pigment AI for scenario modeling
- +Multi-dimensional modeling
- +Modern UX
- +Strong collaboration features
- +100+ integrations
Vena
Excel-native FP&A with strongest CFO satisfaction.
Vena is the Excel-native FP&A platform, founded 2011 in Toronto. The product's differentiator: Excel as the front-end (CFOs and finance teams keep using Excel) with a database back-end and workflow layer. Strengths: highest CFO satisfaction in category, strongest fit for Excel-anchored finance teams, strong workflow + audit trail, and modern UX with familiar Excel front-end. Best fit for mid-market organizations ($50M-$1B revenue) with finance teams that live in Excel. Trade-offs: Excel-anchored approach has ceiling at upper enterprise (Anaplan better at $1B+ revenue), Support depends on tier as company scaled, and implementation 2-6 months.
Mid-market organizations ($50M-$1B revenue, 200-2,000 employees) with finance teams that live in Excel, wanting modern FP&A without abandoning Excel.
Large enterprise complex multi-dimensional planning (Anaplan better), buyers wanting non-Excel UX (Pigment cleaner), or SMBs (Cube/Datarails cheaper).
Strengths
- Excel-native (CFO familiar interface)
- Highest CFO satisfaction in category
- Strong workflow + audit trail
- Made for Excel-anchored finance teams
- Modern UX with familiar front-end
- Vena Copilot AI
Weaknesses
- Excel-anchored approach has ceiling at upper enterprise
- Support inconsistency reported as company scaled
- Implementation 2-6 months
- Per-user pricing scales fast
- Multi-dimensional modeling below Anaplan
Pricing tiers
opaque- Vena Standard~$25K-$80K/year typicalQuote
- Vena Pro$80K-$200K/yearQuote
- Vena Enterprise$200K-$500K+/yearQuote
- · Implementation fees ($25K-$200K)
- · Per-user scaling
- · Annual price increases
Key features
- +Excel-native front-end
- +Database back-end with workflow
- +Multi-scenario planning
- +Audit trail
- +Vena Copilot AI
- +Modern UX
- +100+ integrations
Cube
Connect-and-go FP&A with Excel + Google Sheets native.
Cube is the connect-and-go FP&A platform, founded 2018. The product connects directly to your ERP (NetSuite, QuickBooks, etc.) and pushes data to Excel and Google Sheets without complex implementation. Strengths: fastest implementation in category (under 1 month), Excel + Google Sheets dual-native, modern UX, and strong fit for hands-off mid-market finance teams. Best fit for mid-market organizations ($25M-$300M revenue) wanting FP&A without complex setup. Trade-offs: feature depth below Anaplan/Vena, less suited for complex multi-dimensional planning, and Uneven support quality.
Mid-market organizations ($25M-$300M revenue, 50-500 employees) wanting fast-to-deploy FP&A without complex setup or change management.
Large enterprise complex planning (Anaplan better), buyers wanting deepest features (Vena/Pigment better), or SMBs (Jirav cheaper).
Strengths
- Fastest implementation in category (under 1 month)
- Excel + Google Sheets dual-native
- Modern UX
- Works for hands-off mid-market
- Founder-led
- Affordable mid-market pricing
Weaknesses
- Feature depth below Anaplan/Vena
- Less suited for complex multi-dimensional planning
- Support depends on tier
- Smaller integration ecosystem (~50)
- Innovation pace below Pigment
Pricing tiers
public- Cube GoSMB; basic features$1500 /mo
- Cube ProMid-market; advanced features$3500 /mo
- Cube EnterpriseCustom; enterpriseQuote
- · Annual billing for discount
- · Per-user overages above tier limits
Key features
- +Connect-and-go FP&A
- +Excel + Google Sheets dual-native
- +Modern UX
- +Multi-scenario planning
- +Cube AI
- +50+ integrations
Workiva
Compliance + reporting + FP&A for SEC-reporting public companies.
Workiva is the connected reporting and compliance platform, founded 2008 and public since 2014. The product combines FP&A + SEC reporting + audit + ESG reporting in one platform. Strengths: strongest fit for SEC-reporting public companies, mature compliance and audit features, public company financial transparency, and integrated reporting + planning. Best fit for public companies and audit-heavy industries (financial services, healthcare). Trade-offs: not a pure FP&A tool (Anaplan/Vena better for non-public-company FP&A), pricing meaningful, and implementation complex.
Public companies (especially SEC-reporting US public) and audit-heavy industries (financial services, healthcare, government) wanting integrated FP&A + compliance + audit reporting.
Pure FP&A use cases (Anaplan/Vena better), private mid-market (Vena/Pigment better), or SMBs (overpriced).
Strengths
- Strongest fit for SEC-reporting public companies
- Mature compliance and audit features
- Public company financial transparency
- Integrated reporting + planning
- Strong ESG reporting capabilities
- Long-standing brand (17+ years)
Weaknesses
- Not a pure FP&A tool
- Pricing meaningful
- Implementation complex (3-9 months)
- UX dated relative to modern challengers
- Less suited for non-public-company FP&A
Pricing tiers
opaque- Workiva Standard~$50K-$200K/year typicalQuote
- Workiva Pro$200K-$500K/yearQuote
- Workiva Enterprise$500K-$2M+/yearQuote
- · Implementation services ($25K-$200K)
- · Per-module add-ons
- · Annual price increases
Key features
- +Connected reporting platform
- +SEC reporting
- +FP&A
- +Audit + compliance
- +ESG reporting
- +XBRL tagging
- +Mature workflow
- +100+ integrations
Planful
Established FP&A platform (formerly Host Analytics).
Planful is the established FP&A platform, founded 2001 (rebranded from Host Analytics in 2020). The company was acquired by Vector Capital in 2018. The product covers planning + consolidation + reporting + financial close. Strengths: long-standing brand (24+ years), mature feature set, strong fit for upper mid-market needing proven enterprise features, and modern UX after 2020 rebrand. Best fit for upper mid-market ($100M-$1B revenue) wanting proven FP&A. Trade-offs: post-Vector velocity has been mixed, Support depends on tier, and Behind modern entrants on release cadence (Pigment).
Upper mid-market ($100M-$1B revenue, 500-2,500 employees) wanting proven FP&A with mature financial close and reporting.
Large enterprise complex planning (Anaplan better), modern UX seekers (Pigment cleaner), or value-driven mid-market (Cube/Datarails cheaper).
Strengths
- Long-standing brand (24+ years)
- Mature feature set
- Best for upper mid-market
- Modern UX after 2020 rebrand
- Mature financial close capabilities
- Established partner ecosystem
Weaknesses
- Post-Vector velocity mixed
- Support inconsistency reported
- Lagging upstarts on velocity
- Thinner footprint than Anaplan
- UX still catching up to modern challengers
Pricing tiers
opaque- Planful Standard~$30K-$80K/year typicalQuote
- Planful Pro$80K-$200K/yearQuote
- Planful Enterprise$200K-$600K/yearQuote
- · Implementation fees
- · Per-user scaling
- · Annual price increases
Key features
- +Cloud FP&A platform
- +Multi-scenario planning
- +Financial close + consolidation
- +Reporting
- +Modern UX
- +100+ integrations
Datarails
Mid-market value FP&A with Excel + modern UX overlay.
Datarails is the mid-market value FP&A platform, founded 2015. The product combines Excel-native finance workflows with a modern UX overlay (FP&A Genius AI assistant). Strengths: strong feature parity at lower mid-market price than Vena, Excel + modern UX combination, FP&A Genius AI, and aggressive mid-market positioning. Best fit for mid-market organizations ($25M-$500M revenue) wanting Vena-class features at lower price. Trade-offs: enterprise depth below Anaplan, Support depends on tier, and brand recognition lower than Vena/Anaplan.
Mid-market organizations ($25M-$500M revenue, 50-1,500 employees) wanting Vena-class FP&A at meaningfully lower price.
Large enterprise (Anaplan better), Workday HCM customers (Workday Adaptive native), or modern UX-only seekers (Pigment cleaner).
Strengths
- Strong feature parity at lower price
- Excel + modern UX combination
- FP&A Genius AI assistant
- Aggressive mid-market positioning
- Founder-led
- Right call for mid-market
Weaknesses
- Enterprise depth below Anaplan
- Support inconsistency reported
- Brand recognition lower than Vena/Anaplan
- Smaller integration ecosystem (~80)
- Innovation pace below Pigment
Pricing tiers
opaque- Datarails Standard~$15K-$40K/year typicalQuote
- Datarails Pro$40K-$120K/yearQuote
- Datarails Enterprise$120K-$300K/yearQuote
- · Implementation fees
- · Per-user scaling
- · Annual price increases
Key features
- +Excel-native + modern UX
- +FP&A Genius AI
- +Multi-scenario planning
- +Reporting
- +Workflow + audit trail
- +80+ integrations
Mosaic
SaaS-anchored FP&A for venture-backed companies.
Mosaic is the SaaS-anchored FP&A platform, founded 2019. The product is purpose-built for SaaS finance teams, ARR forecasting, SaaS metrics native (CAC, LTV, NRR, GRR), pipeline-to-revenue modeling. Strengths: strongest SaaS metrics native, pre-built SaaS templates, modern UX, founder-led, and fast onboarding. Best fit for venture-backed SaaS companies ($10M-$500M ARR). Trade-offs: not a fit for non-SaaS verticals (Anaplan/Vena better for retail, manufacturing, services), enterprise depth below Anaplan, and methodology less proven for non-SaaS use cases.
Venture-backed SaaS companies ($10M-$500M ARR, 50-1,000 employees) wanting purpose-built FP&A with native SaaS metrics.
Non-SaaS verticals (Anaplan/Vena better), large enterprise (Anaplan better), or budget-conscious SMBs (Jirav cheaper).
Strengths
- Strongest SaaS metrics native
- Pre-built SaaS templates
- Modern UX
- Founder-led
- Fast onboarding
- Fits venture-backed SaaS
Weaknesses
- Not a fit for non-SaaS verticals
- Enterprise depth below Anaplan
- Methodology less proven for non-SaaS
- Smaller integration ecosystem (~60)
- Support is hit-or-miss
Pricing tiers
opaque- Mosaic Pro~$25K-$75K/year typicalQuote
- Mosaic Premium$75K-$200K/yearQuote
- Mosaic Enterprise$200K-$500K/yearQuote
- · Implementation fees
- · Per-user scaling
- · Annual price increases
Key features
- +SaaS metrics native
- +Pre-built SaaS templates
- +ARR forecasting
- +Modern UX
- +Mosaic AI for analysis
- +60+ integrations
Jirav
SMB-friendly FP&A at $750-$2,000/month.
Jirav is the SMB-friendly FP&A platform, founded 2016. The product covers planning + budgeting + reporting at meaningfully lower pricing than mid-market FP&A vendors. Strengths: affordable SMB pricing ($750-$2,000/mo), strong fit for sub-$50M revenue companies, modern UX, and fast onboarding. Best fit for SMBs ($5M-$50M revenue, 25-200 employees) wanting modern FP&A without enterprise pricing. Trade-offs: feature depth below Anaplan/Vena, less suited for complex planning, and Support response times vary.
SMBs ($5M-$50M revenue, 25-200 employees), especially services and venture-backed early-stage, wanting modern FP&A without enterprise pricing.
Large enterprise (Anaplan/Vena better), Workday HCM customers (Workday Adaptive native), or buyers needing deepest planning features.
Strengths
- Affordable SMB pricing
- Built for sub-$50M revenue companies
- Modern UX
- Fast onboarding
- Founder-led
- Pre-built SMB templates
Weaknesses
- Feature depth below Anaplan/Vena
- Less suited for complex planning
- Support is hit-or-miss
- Smaller integration ecosystem (~50)
- Innovation pace below Pigment
Pricing tiers
public- Standard5 users; basic features$750 /mo
- Business10 users; advanced features$1500 /mo
- Premium20 users; full platform$2000 /mo
- EnterpriseCustomQuote
- · Per-user overages
- · Annual billing for discount
Key features
- +Cloud-native FP&A platform
- +Pre-built SMB templates
- +Modern UX
- +Multi-scenario planning
- +Reporting
- +50+ integrations
Frequently asked questions
The questions buyers actually ask before they sign.
Anaplan vs Workday Adaptive Planning for a Westpac-tier Australian bank?
Pigment vs Anaplan for a Canva-tier Australian SaaS at 2,000 employees?
How does APRA stress testing affect FP&A software selection?
Does AASB S2 climate disclosure affect FP&A planning?
Anaplan vs Workday Adaptive Planning, which one?
How does this differ from your Mid-Market Accounting / BI rankings?
How much should I budget for FP&A software?
How long does FP&A implementation take?
What about AI features in 2026?
Should I keep Excel or move to dedicated FP&A?
Can I evaluate FP&A platforms via free trial?
How does this overlap with FP&A consultants and partners?
Final word
Looking at a different market? See the global FP&A (Financial Planning & Analysis) Software ranking, or pick another country at the top of this page.
Last updated 2026-05-24. Local pricing reverified quarterly. Found something inaccurate? Tell us.