Skip to content
Z Zendikt
Australia edition · 10 products ranked · Verified 2026-05-24

Top 10 DLP Software in Australia for 2026

Independent Aussie DLP ranking, AUD pricing, ASD Essential Eight ML 2/3 coverage, SOCI Act 2018, IRAP PROTECTED context, and APRA CPS 234 obligations.

← Global ranking · Category overview
Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Software by country
🌐 Global United States India United Kingdom France Germany Australia Canada

Australia verdict (TL;DR)

Verified 2026-05-24

Microsoft Purview dominates Aussie enterprise DLP at CBA, Westpac, NAB, ANZ, Telstra, and federal/state government because M365 E5 bundles it on Azure Australia Central (Canberra, IRAP PROTECTED). Forcepoint, Symantec, and Trellix cover Aussie defence and PROTECTED-rated estates. Proofpoint and Netskope DLP lead at modern stack and SASE-aware buyers. Nightfall fits SaaS-native (Atlassian, Canva). Code42 is endpoint-data-loss for insider-risk-led buyers. SOCI Act 2018, ASD Essential Eight (ML 1/2/3), APRA CPS 234 / CPS 230, and Privacy Act APP 11 drive the shortlist.

Picks for Australia

  • Aussie federal / state government PROTECTED: Microsoft Purview M365 E5 bundle. Azure Australia Central (Canberra) IRAP-assessed at PROTECTED. Default at Services Australia, DTA, ATO.
  • Defence and Critical Infrastructure SOCI Act 2018: Forcepoint DLP IRAP-assessed up to PROTECTED. Used at Defence, Defence-industry contractors, and SOCI critical infrastructure buyers.
  • Email-channel data loss prevention at Aussie enterprise: Proofpoint DLP Email-first DLP. Default at CBA, Westpac, NAB, ANZ-tier Aussie banking email security.
  • SASE-aware DLP for cloud-first Aussie SaaS: Netskope DLP Strong cloud-app DLP. Used at Atlassian, Canva, REA Group-style cloud-heavy Aussie enterprise.
  • Legacy enterprise PROTECTED estate (defence-adjacent): Symantec DLP Mature on-prem and hybrid. IRAP-assessed. Still entrenched at large Aussie regulated estates.
  • SaaS-native DLP for cloud-only stacks: Nightfall API-driven DLP for Slack, Google Workspace, GitHub. Fits Atlassian, Canva, Linktree, Octopus Deploy.
  • Insider risk and endpoint data exfiltration: Code42 Insider-risk-led endpoint DLP. Pairs with Microsoft Purview for endpoint exfil visibility.
Market context

How the data loss prevention (dlp) software market looks in Australia

Aussie DLP is dominated by Microsoft Purview because M365 E5 is the standard productivity stack at CBA, Westpac, NAB, ANZ, Suncorp, IAG, AMP, Medibank, Telstra, and most Aussie federal and state agencies. Azure Australia Central (Canberra) is IRAP-assessed at PROTECTED, which makes Purview the default for any sensitive Australian government data. Defence and SOCI Act 2018 critical infrastructure buyers add Forcepoint, Symantec, or Trellix DLP for deeper content inspection and PROTECTED-rated coverage.

Proofpoint DLP wins email-channel data loss prevention at all four major Aussie banks. Netskope DLP leads SASE-aware deployments at cloud-heavy enterprise (Atlassian, Canva, REA Group, Seek, Linktree). Nightfall fits SaaS-native Aussie stacks where the data lives in Slack, GitHub, Google Workspace, and Confluence. Code42 dominates insider-risk and endpoint data exfiltration use cases at firms post-breach or where workforce-mobility is high.

Endpoint Protector and BigID serve niche segments - Endpoint Protector for endpoint-centric SMB and mid-market; BigID for data-discovery-led governance at APRA-regulated buyers needing CDR-ready data mapping. ASD Essential Eight Maturity Levels (ML 1, 2, 3) drive procurement at PROTECTED-aligned buyers; ML 2 is now expected at federal agencies, ML 3 for sensitive defence work. APRA CPS 234, CPS 230 (July 2025), Privacy Act APP 11, Notifiable Data Breaches scheme, SOCI Act 2018, and Modern Slavery Act 2018 all shape the buying decision.

Compliance & local rules

DLP platforms inspect content for sensitive data (PII, PHI, payment cards, defence-marked content) which means deep visibility into Australian personal information. Privacy Act 1988 and APP 11 (security), APP 6 (use and disclosure), APP 8 (cross-border), and APP 12 (access) apply. Notifiable Data Breaches scheme requires OAIC reporting within 30 days. APRA CPS 234 information security applies for regulated banks, insurers, super funds; CPS 230 operational resilience from July 2025 adds material-service-provider obligations. ASD Essential Eight Maturity Levels (1, 2, 3) drive procurement at federal agencies. SOCI Act 2018 applies for critical infrastructure (telco, banking, energy, water, healthcare). IRAP assessment at PROTECTED is required for PROTECTED government data; Microsoft Purview, Forcepoint, Symantec, and Trellix DLP have IRAP coverage. PSPF and ISM controls apply. AUSTRAC AML/CTF requirements affect financial-services DLP. ATO record-keeping and ASIC market integrity rules apply. Modern Slavery Act 2018 affects supplier risk. Azure Australia Central (Canberra) is the standard PROTECTED region; AWS Sydney for OFFICIAL.

At a glance

Quick comparison, ranked for Australia

Product Best for Starts at 10-emp/mo* Pricing G2 Geo
1 Microsoft Purview
Microsoft 365 E5 enterprises
 $0 $0 4.3 North America +4
2 Forcepoint DLP
Enterprise legacy DLP
 Quote - 4.1 North America +2
6 Proofpoint Information Protection
Existing Proofpoint email customers
 Quote - 4.2 North America +2
8 Netskope DLP
Netskope SSE customers
 Quote - 4.5 North America +2
4 Symantec DLP
Fortune-500 legacy enterprise
 Quote - 3.9 North America +4
5 Trellix DLP
McAfee legacy enterprise
 Quote - 4.0 North America +2
3 Nightfall
Modern cloud-native enterprises
 Quote - 4.7 North America +2
7 Code42 Incydr
Insider-risk-management programs
 Quote - 4.5 North America +2
9 Endpoint Protector
Mid-market cross-platform endpoint
 Quote - 4.6 Europe +2
10 BigID
Mid-market and enterprise data discovery
 Quote - 4.4 North America +2

*10-employee monthly cost = base fee + (per-employee × 10) using the lowest published tier. For opaque-pricing vendors, no value is shown.

Verified local pricing

What buyers in Australia actually pay

Median annual deal size by employee band, in AUD. Crowdsourced from anonymized buyer disclosures.

Product Employee band Median annual (AUD) Sample Notes
Microsoft Purview Enterprise (banking, telco, gov) A$1,280,000 11 M365 E5 bundle, Azure AU Central
Forcepoint DLP PROTECTED gov / defence A$685,000 7 Forcepoint ONE DLP, IRAP-assessed
Proofpoint Information Protection Enterprise (banking, telco) A$412,000 9 Information Protection bundle
Netskope DLP 500-5,000 employees A$285,000 8 SASE bundle, AU residency
Symantec DLP PROTECTED enterprise A$615,000 5 Symantec DLP, hybrid
Nightfall 200-1,000 employees A$92,000 12 SaaS DLP, Slack/GitHub/Workspace
Code42 Incydr Insider risk 500-5,000 employees A$168,000 7 Incydr, endpoint exfil
Local challengers

Australia-built or Australia-strong vendors worth knowing

Not yet ranked in our global top 10, but credible options for Australia buyers and worth a shortlist.

Microsoft Australia (Sydney + Canberra)

Visit ↗

Microsoft runs Canberra office serving Australian government. Azure Australia Central IRAP-PROTECTED. Default Aussie government DLP.

Macquarie Government Cloud

Visit ↗

Aussie sovereign cloud provider, hosts DLP for PROTECTED government workloads.

Vault Cloud

Visit ↗

Aussie sovereign cloud, IRAP-PROTECTED, hosts defence and SOCI critical infrastructure DLP.

CyberCX

Visit ↗

Sydney-headquartered cyber MSSP. Default integrator for Forcepoint, Symantec, Trellix DLP at Aussie PROTECTED estates.

Excluded for Australia

Global picks that don't fit here

  • Endpoint Protector
    SMB endpoint focus; Aussie enterprise prefers Microsoft Purview or Forcepoint at scale.
  • BigID
    Data discovery and privacy focus rather than enforcement DLP; complements rather than replaces.
The Australia ranking

All 10, ranked for Australia

Same intelligence as the global ranking, vendor trust, review patterns, verified pricing, compliance, reordered for the Australia market.

#1

Microsoft Purview

Microsoft 365 + Azure-anchored DLP with deepest M365 integration via E5 bundle.

Founded 2022 · Redmond, WA · public · 1,000-200,000+ employees
G2 4.3 (480)
Capterra 4.4
From $0 /mo
◐ Partial disclosure
Visit Microsoft Purview

Microsoft Purview was launched April 2022 as the rebrand and unification of Microsoft Compliance, Microsoft Information Protection, and Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps DLP modules. The platform serves Microsoft 365 + Azure-anchored enterprises with deepest M365 integration: native DLP for Exchange Online, SharePoint Online, OneDrive, Teams, and Endpoint Windows + Mac. Wins on M365 integration depth, E5 bundle economics (no additional cost for E5 customers), and broad enterprise reach. Loses on non-Microsoft data estate coverage (Salesforce, AWS, GCP need add-on connectors) and complex policy authoring versus modern UX peers.

Best for

Microsoft 365 E5 enterprises (5000+ employees) wanting bundled DLP with deepest M365 integration.

Worst for

Non-Microsoft enterprises (Forcepoint + Symantec + Trellix fit better); SaaS-anchored buyers (Nightfall fit better).

Strengths

  • Microsoft 365 + Azure native integration: deepest in category
  • E5 bundle includes Purview DLP at no additional cost
  • Multi-region, multi-tenant support at enterprise scale
  • Strong endpoint DLP for Windows + Mac
  • Microsoft Defender XDR integration
  • Mature reporting and analytics dashboards

Weaknesses

  • Non-Microsoft data estate coverage thinner; needs Defender for Cloud Apps connectors
  • Complex policy authoring versus modern UX peers
  • E1/E3-only customers face higher relative cost
  • Implementation timelines 8-16 weeks typical
  • Customer-support quality varies

Pricing tiers

partial
  • M365 E5 (bundled)
    Bundled with E5 license; per-user cost layered into E5
    $0 /mo
  • Standalone DLP
    Standalone licensing for E1/E3 customers
    Quote
Watch for
  • · E5 license cost typically $57/user/mo
  • · Defender for Cloud Apps add-on for non-Microsoft data estate
  • · Implementation services $30K-$200K typical

Key features

  • +Native M365 DLP (Exchange, SharePoint, OneDrive, Teams)
  • +Endpoint DLP for Windows + Mac
  • +Microsoft Defender XDR integration
  • +E5 bundle economics
  • +Multi-region, multi-tenant support
  • +Mature reporting and analytics
  • +Sensitivity-label-driven DLP policies
  • +Compliance Manager integration
250+ integrations
Microsoft 365AzureDefender XDRDefender for Cloud AppsAzure AD/EntraPower BICompliance Manager
Geography
North America · Europe · Asia-Pacific · Latin America · Middle East
View full Microsoft Purview intelligence profile → Compare Microsoft Purview →
#2

Forcepoint DLP

Enterprise legacy DLP with broad workload coverage, Francisco Partners-controlled since 2021.

Founded 1996 · Austin, TX · pe backed · 2,000-100,000+ employees
G2 4.1 (380)
Capterra 4.2
Custom quote
○ Sales call required
Visit Forcepoint DLP

Forcepoint DLP traces to Websense (founded 1994) and the 2015 Raytheon+Vista merger that formed Forcepoint. Francisco Partners acquired Forcepoint in 2021 ($1.1B) and consolidated the platform under Forcepoint ONE in 2023. The DLP module retains broad workload coverage (endpoint, network, cloud, email) and a deep installed base across Fortune-500. Wins on workload-coverage breadth and Forcepoint ONE SSE integration. Loses on post-PE product-investment-velocity questions, customer-support quality, and modernization speed versus Microsoft Purview.

Best for

Existing Forcepoint customers running broad workload DLP at enterprise scale.

Worst for

Microsoft-anchored buyers (Microsoft Purview fit better); modern SaaS-data-DLP (Nightfall fit better).

Strengths

  • Broad workload coverage: endpoint + network + cloud + email DLP
  • Forcepoint ONE SSE integration
  • Deep Fortune-500 installed base
  • Mature content-inspection engine with 1700+ pre-built classifiers
  • Multi-region enterprise scalability
  • Strong regulated-industry (financial services, healthcare, government) fit

Weaknesses

  • Post-Francisco-Partners product-investment-velocity questions
  • Customer-support quality concerns per disclosures
  • UX modernization slower than Microsoft Purview
  • Implementation complexity high (6-12 months for enterprise rollouts)
  • Pricing opacity; six-figure deals standard

Pricing tiers

opaque
  • Forcepoint DLP
    Standalone DLP licensing
    Quote
  • Forcepoint ONE SSE
    Full SSE bundle including DLP
    Quote
Watch for
  • · Implementation services $80K-$500K for enterprise rollouts
  • · Add-on charges for advanced content classifiers
  • · Renewal pricing pressure 10-20% common

Key features

  • +Endpoint + network + cloud + email DLP
  • +Forcepoint ONE SSE integration
  • +1700+ pre-built content classifiers
  • +OCR for image-based DLP
  • +Optical Character Recognition (OCR)
  • +Multi-region enterprise scalability
  • +Mature reporting and analytics
  • +Risk-Adaptive Protection (RAP) module
120+ integrations
SAPOracleMicrosoft 365SalesforceServiceNowSplunkIBM QRadarCyberArk
Geography
North America · Europe · Asia-Pacific
View full Forcepoint DLP intelligence profile → Compare Forcepoint DLP →
#6

Proofpoint Information Protection

Email-anchored DLP with cloud-collaboration coverage; Thoma Bravo-owned since 2021.

Founded 2002 · Sunnyvale, CA · private · 2,000-50,000+ employees
G2 4.2 (280)
Capterra 4.3
Custom quote
○ Sales call required
Visit Proofpoint Information Protection

Proofpoint was acquired by Thoma Bravo in 2021 ($12.3B take-private). The Information Protection module extends Proofpoint email security into DLP across email, cloud collaboration (Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, Slack), endpoint, and data discovery. Wins on email-security heritage and tight integration with Proofpoint email anti-phishing platform. Loses on post-Thoma-Bravo product investment trajectory and broader workload coverage versus Forcepoint and Symantec.

Best for

Existing Proofpoint email security customers wanting unified email + DLP platform.

Worst for

Non-Proofpoint customers wanting standalone DLP (Microsoft Purview + Forcepoint fit better).

Strengths

  • Email-security heritage with tight DLP integration
  • Cloud collaboration coverage (M365, Google Workspace, Slack)
  • Mature content-inspection engine
  • Endpoint DLP module
  • Insider Threat Management (ITM) acquired with ObserveIT 2020
  • Strong Fortune-500 references

Weaknesses

  • Post-Thoma-Bravo product investment velocity questions
  • Network DLP thinner than Forcepoint + Symantec
  • Pricing complexity with multiple module add-ons
  • Customer-support quality varies
  • Implementation complexity high

Pricing tiers

opaque
  • Information Protection
    Standalone DLP licensing
    Quote
  • Proofpoint Enterprise
    Full Proofpoint platform with DLP
    Quote
Watch for
  • · Implementation services $40K-$300K typical
  • · Add-on module charges

Key features

  • +Email DLP with anti-phishing integration
  • +Cloud collaboration DLP (M365, Google Workspace, Slack)
  • +Endpoint DLP module
  • +Insider Threat Management (ITM)
  • +Mature content-inspection engine
  • +Integration with Proofpoint Enterprise
  • +Multi-region enterprise scalability
  • +Risk-based DLP scoring
80+ integrations
Microsoft 365Google WorkspaceSalesforceSlackBoxServiceNowSplunkProofpoint Email
Geography
North America · Europe · Asia-Pacific
View full Proofpoint Information Protection intelligence profile → Compare Proofpoint Information Protection →
#8

Netskope DLP

Cloud-native DLP integrated with Netskope SSE/CASB platform.

Founded 2012 · Santa Clara, CA · private · 2,000-100,000+ employees
G2 4.5 (280)
Capterra 4.5
Custom quote
○ Sales call required
Visit Netskope DLP

Netskope DLP is the DLP module of the broader Netskope SSE platform (covered in our CASB ranking under netskope and ZTNA ranking). The module wins on cloud-native architecture, SSE integration, and modern UX. Loses on standalone-DLP feature depth versus Forcepoint + Symantec for legacy workloads.

Best for

Netskope SSE customers wanting unified DLP in single SSE platform.

Worst for

Legacy-DLP buyers wanting standalone endpoint+network coverage (Forcepoint + Symantec fit better).

Strengths

  • Cloud-native architecture
  • Integrated with Netskope SSE/CASB/ZTNA platform
  • Modern UX with policy-authoring assistance
  • Strong SaaS application coverage
  • Multi-region enterprise scalability
  • Netskope OneCloud architecture

Weaknesses

  • Standalone-DLP feature depth thinner than Forcepoint + Symantec
  • Legacy on-prem workload coverage limited
  • Pricing tied to Netskope SSE subscription
  • Brand mindshare in legacy-DLP procurement defaults lower

Pricing tiers

opaque
  • Netskope DLP Add-on
    Add-on to Netskope SSE subscription
    Quote
  • Netskope OneCloud
    Full SSE + DLP bundle
    Quote
Watch for
  • · Pricing layered on top of Netskope SSE subscription
  • · Implementation services priced separately

Key features

  • +Cloud-native DLP
  • +Integrated with Netskope SSE/CASB/ZTNA
  • +Modern UX with policy-authoring assistance
  • +Strong SaaS application coverage
  • +Multi-region enterprise scalability
  • +Netskope OneCloud architecture
  • +API-based DLP for sanctioned SaaS
  • +Mature reporting and analytics
200+ integrations
Microsoft 365Google WorkspaceSalesforceAWSAzureGCPSplunkCrowdStrike
Geography
North America · Europe · Asia-Pacific
View full Netskope DLP intelligence profile → Compare Netskope DLP →
#4

Symantec DLP

Broadcom-owned Symantec DLP with deepest legacy-enterprise installed base.

Founded 1982 · San Jose, CA · public · 5,000-200,000+ employees
G2 3.9 (320)
Capterra 4.0
Custom quote
○ Sales call required
Visit Symantec DLP

Symantec DLP traces to the 2007 Vontu acquisition and was inherited by Broadcom when Broadcom acquired Symantec Enterprise Security in 2019 ($10.7B). Broadcom is known for post-acquisition margin extraction: cost-restructure, customer-support reduction, pricing increases. The Symantec DLP module retains the deepest legacy-enterprise installed base (Fortune-500 deployments going back 15+ years) but suffers from post-Broadcom product-investment-velocity questions and customer-support quality concerns. Wins on Fortune-500 references and content-inspection-engine maturity. Loses on post-Broadcom trajectory and modernization speed.

Best for

Existing Symantec DLP customers with 10+ year deployments wanting to stay and extend.

Worst for

New buyers (Microsoft Purview + Forcepoint + Trellix fit better).

Strengths

  • Deepest legacy-enterprise installed base (15+ year deployments)
  • Mature content-inspection engine with extensive regulated-industry support
  • Multi-region enterprise scalability
  • Broad workload coverage: endpoint + network + cloud + email
  • Fortune-500 references and case studies
  • Strong financial-services + healthcare + government installed base

Weaknesses

  • Post-Broadcom product-investment-velocity slowed significantly
  • Customer-support quality concerns documented post-acquisition
  • UX modernization slower than peers
  • Renewal pricing pressure 15-30% common per Broadcom standard
  • Implementation complexity high (8-16 months for new enterprise rollouts)

Pricing tiers

opaque
  • Symantec DLP
    Standalone DLP licensing
    Quote
Watch for
  • · Implementation services $100K-$800K typical
  • · Add-on charges for advanced modules
  • · Renewal pricing pressure 15-30% common

Key features

  • +Mature content-inspection engine
  • +Endpoint + network + cloud + email DLP
  • +Multi-region enterprise scalability
  • +Regulated-industry content classifiers
  • +Risk-based DLP scoring
  • +OCR for image-based DLP
  • +Integration with Symantec Enterprise Security
  • +Strong Fortune-500 references
100+ integrations
SAPOracleMicrosoft 365SalesforceServiceNowSplunkIBM QRadarSymantec Endpoint
Geography
North America · Europe · Asia-Pacific · Latin America · Middle East
View full Symantec DLP intelligence profile → Compare Symantec DLP →
#5

Trellix DLP

McAfee Enterprise + FireEye merged DLP under Symphony Technology Group ownership.

Founded 2022 · San Jose, CA · pe backed · 5,000-100,000+ employees
G2 4.0 (240)
Capterra 4.1
Custom quote
○ Sales call required
Visit Trellix DLP

Trellix was formed in January 2022 when Symphony Technology Group (STG) merged McAfee Enterprise + FireEye after acquiring both in 2021. The DLP module inherits McAfee DLP heritage (one of the longest-tenured enterprise DLP products) but suffers from post-merger consolidation and STG cost-restructure pressure. Wins on McAfee DLP heritage and broad workload coverage. Loses on post-STG product velocity concerns, customer-support quality, and Trellix brand recognition still maturing.

Best for

Existing McAfee DLP customers wanting to stay with Trellix.

Worst for

New buyers (Microsoft Purview + Nightfall + Forcepoint fit better).

Strengths

  • McAfee DLP heritage with deep enterprise installed base
  • Broad workload coverage: endpoint + network + cloud + email
  • Integration with Trellix XDR platform
  • Multi-region enterprise scalability
  • Fortune-1000 references and case studies
  • Mature content-inspection engine

Weaknesses

  • Post-STG product velocity slowed
  • Customer-support quality concerns documented
  • Trellix brand recognition still maturing post-merger
  • UX modernization slower than peers
  • Implementation complexity high

Pricing tiers

opaque
  • Trellix DLP
    Standalone DLP licensing
    Quote
  • Trellix XDR Platform
    Full XDR bundle including DLP
    Quote
Watch for
  • · Implementation services $50K-$400K typical
  • · Add-on charges for advanced modules
  • · Migration friction post-McAfee-FireEye merger

Key features

  • +McAfee DLP heritage
  • +Endpoint + network + cloud + email DLP
  • +Trellix XDR platform integration
  • +Multi-region enterprise scalability
  • +Mature content-inspection engine
  • +Risk-based DLP scoring
  • +OCR for image-based DLP
  • +Integration with Trellix Security
100+ integrations
Microsoft 365SalesforceServiceNowSplunkIBM QRadarTrellix XDRCyberArk
Geography
North America · Europe · Asia-Pacific
View full Trellix DLP intelligence profile → Compare Trellix DLP →
#3

Nightfall

API-first SaaS-data DLP for modern cloud-native enterprises.

Founded 2018 · San Francisco, CA · private · 100-5,000 employees
G2 4.7 (180)
Capterra 4.6
Custom quote
◐ Partial disclosure
Visit Nightfall

Nightfall launched 2018 (founder Isaac Madan) and closed a $40M Series B Mar 2022 led by Bain Capital Ventures. The platform serves SaaS-data DLP with API-first integration into Slack, Salesforce, GitHub, Confluence, Notion, Google Workspace, and other modern cloud-collaboration tools. Wins on SaaS-data coverage breadth, modern UX, and developer-friendly architecture. Loses on traditional endpoint DLP coverage and brand mindshare in legacy-enterprise procurement defaults.

Best for

Modern cloud-native enterprises (200-5000 employees) wanting SaaS-data DLP for Slack + Salesforce + GitHub.

Worst for

Legacy enterprise wanting endpoint+network DLP (Forcepoint + Symantec fit better).

Strengths

  • API-first SaaS-data DLP
  • Native Slack, Salesforce, GitHub, Confluence, Notion integration
  • Modern UX with rapid time-to-launch (typically 4-8 weeks)
  • Machine-learning-driven content detection
  • Developer-friendly architecture with public API
  • Strong startup-and-mid-market customer base

Weaknesses

  • Traditional endpoint DLP coverage absent
  • Network DLP not native; relies on SaaS integration
  • Brand mindshare in legacy-enterprise procurement defaults lower
  • Capital base smaller than legacy enterprise peers
  • Sales motion still maturing for Fortune-500

Pricing tiers

partial
  • Pro
    Per-user pricing for SaaS-data DLP
    Quote
  • Enterprise
    Unlimited integrations, custom features
    Quote
Watch for
  • · Implementation services $5K-$30K typical
  • · Per-SaaS-app charges at higher tiers

Key features

  • +API-first SaaS-data DLP
  • +Native Slack, Salesforce, GitHub, Confluence integrations
  • +Machine-learning content detection
  • +Public API for custom integrations
  • +Modern UX with rapid time-to-launch
  • +Strong startup-and-mid-market reputation
  • +Audit-log and reporting
  • +GDPR + HIPAA + PCI compliance support
60+ integrations
SlackSalesforceGitHubConfluenceNotionGoogle WorkspaceMicrosoft 365Zendesk
Geography
North America · Europe · Asia-Pacific
View full Nightfall intelligence profile → Compare Nightfall →
#7

Code42 Incydr

Insider-risk-management leader with file-data context across endpoint and cloud.

Founded 2001 · Minneapolis, MN · private · 1,500-25,000 employees
G2 4.5 (220)
Capterra 4.5
Custom quote
○ Sales call required
Visit Code42 Incydr

Code42 launched 2001 and rebranded its DLP platform as Incydr in 2020 to focus on insider-risk-management rather than traditional content-inspection DLP. The platform monitors file activity across endpoint + cloud + web with risk-based scoring of user behavior. Wins on insider-risk-management leadership and file-data context. Loses on traditional content-inspection DLP (less of focus) and broader workload coverage versus integrated platforms.

Best for

Insider-risk-management programs at mid-market and enterprise scale (1500-25,000 employees).

Worst for

Traditional content-inspection DLP buyers (Forcepoint + Symantec + Microsoft Purview fit better).

Strengths

  • Insider-risk-management leader with file-data context
  • Endpoint + cloud + web file activity monitoring
  • Risk-based scoring of user behavior
  • Strong departing-employee data-theft detection
  • Mature integrations with HRIS for risk-context
  • Modern UX with risk-analytics-focused workflow

Weaknesses

  • Traditional content-inspection DLP less of focus
  • Network DLP not native
  • Broader workload coverage versus integrated platforms thinner
  • Pricing tiers complex at enterprise scale

Pricing tiers

opaque
  • Incydr Professional
    Insider-risk-management for mid-market
    Quote
  • Incydr Advanced
    Advanced features for enterprise
    Quote
Watch for
  • · Implementation services $20K-$120K typical
  • · Add-on charges for advanced analytics

Key features

  • +Insider-risk-management with file-data context
  • +Endpoint + cloud + web file activity monitoring
  • +Risk-based scoring of user behavior
  • +HRIS integration for risk-context
  • +Departing-employee data-theft detection
  • +Mature reporting and analytics
  • +Modern UX
  • +Integration with SIEM + SOAR platforms
50+ integrations
Microsoft 365Google WorkspaceWorkdayBambooHRSplunkIBM QRadarOktaSlack
Geography
North America · Europe · Asia-Pacific
View full Code42 Incydr intelligence profile → Compare Code42 Incydr →
#9

Endpoint Protector

Cross-platform endpoint DLP with strong Mac + Linux coverage.

Founded 2004 · Cluj-Napoca, Romania · pe backed · 100-10,000 employees
G2 4.6 (180)
Capterra 4.6
Custom quote
◐ Partial disclosure
Visit Endpoint Protector

Endpoint Protector launched 2004 by CoSoSys in Romania and was acquired by Netwrix in 2023. The platform serves mid-market and upper-mid-market with cross-platform endpoint DLP (Windows + Mac + Linux). Wins on cross-platform endpoint coverage (especially Mac + Linux versus Microsoft Purview), affordable mid-market pricing, and European GDPR-native positioning. Loses on network + cloud DLP feature depth and brand mindshare in US enterprise procurement defaults.

Best for

Mid-market and upper-mid-market with cross-platform endpoint requirements (especially Mac + Linux).

Worst for

US enterprise wanting network + cloud DLP (Forcepoint + Microsoft Purview fit better).

Strengths

  • Cross-platform endpoint DLP (Windows + Mac + Linux)
  • Affordable mid-market pricing
  • European GDPR-native positioning
  • Mature device-control module (USB, peripheral)
  • Strong reporting and analytics
  • Multi-language platform

Weaknesses

  • Network + cloud DLP feature depth thinner than peers
  • Brand mindshare in US enterprise procurement defaults lower
  • Post-Netwrix acquisition trajectory still clarifying
  • Smaller installed base than Forcepoint + Symantec

Pricing tiers

partial
  • Essentials
    Endpoint DLP for mid-market
    Quote
  • Enterprise
    Advanced features and multi-region
    Quote
Watch for
  • · Implementation services $5K-$30K typical

Key features

  • +Cross-platform endpoint DLP
  • +Device control (USB, peripheral)
  • +Content-Aware Protection
  • +e-Discovery for data classification
  • +Multi-language platform
  • +Mature reporting and analytics
  • +GDPR + HIPAA + PCI compliance
  • +Integration with SIEM platforms
50+ integrations
Microsoft 365SplunkIBM QRadarSIEM toolsActive Directory
Geography
Europe · North America · Asia-Pacific
View full Endpoint Protector intelligence profile → Compare Endpoint Protector →
#10

BigID

Data-discovery-led DLP with PII + PCI + regulated-data inventory.

Founded 2016 · New York, NY · private · 1,000-50,000+ employees
G2 4.4 (280)
Capterra 4.5
Custom quote
○ Sales call required
Visit BigID

BigID launched 2016 (founder Dimitri Sirota) and closed a $200M Series E Apr 2023 at $1.2B+ valuation led by Riverwood Capital. The platform serves data-discovery-led DLP: discover sensitive data across the estate, classify it, build inventories, then integrate with downstream DLP enforcement. Wins on data-discovery depth, PII + PCI + regulated-data inventory, and integrations with downstream DLP platforms. Loses on standalone DLP enforcement and traditional content-inspection workflows.

Best for

Mid-market and enterprise wanting data-discovery-first approach with downstream DLP integration.

Worst for

Pure DLP-enforcement buyers (Forcepoint + Symantec + Microsoft Purview fit better).

Strengths

  • Data-discovery-led approach: discovers sensitive data across estate first
  • Strong PII + PCI + regulated-data inventory
  • Integrates with downstream DLP platforms (Forcepoint, Symantec, Microsoft Purview)
  • Modern UX with data-discovery-focused workflow
  • Multi-cloud coverage (AWS + Azure + GCP + on-prem)
  • GDPR + CCPA + HIPAA + DPDPA compliance support

Weaknesses

  • Standalone DLP enforcement thinner than dedicated DLP platforms
  • Traditional content-inspection workflows less developed
  • Pricing complexity at enterprise scale
  • Some legacy customers report platform-upgrade friction

Pricing tiers

opaque
  • Discovery
    Data-discovery + classification
    Quote
  • Discovery + DLP Integration
    Full platform with DLP enforcement integration
    Quote
Watch for
  • · Implementation services $40K-$200K typical
  • · Add-on module charges

Key features

  • +Data-discovery across cloud + on-prem estate
  • +PII + PCI + regulated-data inventory
  • +Multi-cloud coverage (AWS + Azure + GCP)
  • +Integration with downstream DLP platforms
  • +Modern UX with data-discovery workflow
  • +GDPR + CCPA + HIPAA + DPDPA compliance support
  • +Risk-based data scoring
  • +Privacy-rights-request automation
100+ integrations
Microsoft 365AWSAzureGCPSalesforceSnowflakeForcepointSymantec
Geography
North America · Europe · Asia-Pacific
View full BigID intelligence profile → Compare BigID →

Frequently asked questions

The questions buyers actually ask before they sign.

Which DLP is IRAP-assessed for Australian government PROTECTED?
Microsoft Purview on Azure Australia Central (Canberra) is the most-used PROTECTED-assessed DLP at Aussie federal and state agencies. Forcepoint DLP, Symantec DLP, and Trellix DLP also carry IRAP PROTECTED assessment. Proofpoint DLP and Netskope DLP have varying IRAP scope, check current assessments at irap.cyber.gov.au.
How does ASD Essential Eight Maturity Level 2 affect DLP procurement?
Essential Eight ML 2 is now expected at most Australian federal agencies. DLP-relevant controls include application control, restrict admin privileges, patch applications, and user application hardening. DLP supports defence-in-depth alongside these. ML 3 (defence-grade) requires deeper content inspection and stricter exfil prevention, typically Forcepoint or Symantec.
Microsoft Purview or Proofpoint DLP for an Aussie bank?
Both are common at CBA, Westpac, NAB, ANZ. Purview for unified data classification across M365, Teams, OneDrive, SharePoint. Proofpoint DLP for email-channel depth and partnership with Proofpoint email security. Most Aussie banks run both for layered protection plus Forcepoint or Symantec for endpoint and PROTECTED content.
How does SOCI Act 2018 affect DLP at critical infrastructure?
SOCI Act 2018 covers 11 critical infrastructure sectors (telco, banking, energy, water, food, healthcare, transport, data storage, defence industry, space, higher education). Affected entities must report cyber incidents to ACSC within 12 hours (significant) or 72 hours (relevant) and maintain risk management programs. DLP is a recognised control under the SOCI Risk Management Program rules.
Microsoft Purview vs Forcepoint vs Symantec, which one wins?
For Microsoft 365 E5 enterprises (the majority of large enterprises in 2026), Microsoft Purview wins because E5 bundle includes Purview DLP at no additional cost plus deepest M365 integration. For non-Microsoft enterprises wanting standalone DLP, Forcepoint wins on workload-coverage breadth and post-PE-acquisition product trajectory (positive 2023-2024 Forcepoint ONE consolidation). Symantec DLP wins only for existing customers with 10+ year deployments; new buyers are increasingly choosing Microsoft Purview or modern alternatives.
What is Nightfall and when does it fit?
Nightfall is API-first SaaS-data DLP for modern cloud-native enterprises. It integrates natively with Slack, Salesforce, GitHub, Confluence, Notion, Google Workspace and similar SaaS tools to detect sensitive data flowing through them. Best fit for modern cloud-native enterprises (200-5000 employees) wanting fast time-to-launch and modern UX. Does not replace traditional endpoint or network DLP for legacy workloads.
How does Code42 Incydr differ from traditional DLP?
Code42 Incydr is insider-risk-management rather than traditional content-inspection DLP. Traditional DLP scans file content for sensitive patterns (PII, PCI, IP) and blocks or quarantines matches. Insider-risk-management (Incydr) monitors user behavior with file data: who took what files, when, where they sent them, whether they are leaving the company. Best fit for insider-risk-management programs at mid-market and enterprise scale. Often deployed alongside traditional content-inspection DLP rather than replacing it.
How much should I budget for DLP software?
SMB / mid-market (100-1500 employees): $18K-$95K/year (Endpoint Protector, Nightfall Pro, Code42 Incydr Professional). Mid-market (1500-5000 employees): $95K-$220K/year (Code42 Incydr Advanced, Nightfall Enterprise, BigID Discovery). Upper-mid-market (5000-25,000 employees): $220K-$680K/year (Forcepoint DLP, Symantec DLP, Trellix DLP, Microsoft Purview standalone, BigID Discovery + DLP). Enterprise (25,000+ employees): $620K-$2.4M/year (Microsoft Purview E5 bundle, Symantec DLP, Forcepoint ONE Enterprise, Netskope DLP Enterprise). E5-bundled Microsoft Purview has the lowest marginal cost for E5 customers but highest absolute cost due to E5 license premium.
How long does DLP implementation take?
Nightfall: 4-8 weeks. Endpoint Protector: 4-10 weeks. Code42 Incydr: 6-12 weeks. Netskope DLP: 8-16 weeks. Microsoft Purview: 8-16 weeks. BigID: 8-16 weeks. Forcepoint DLP: 6-12 months for enterprise rollouts. Symantec DLP: 8-16 months for new enterprise rollouts. Trellix DLP: 6-12 months. Proofpoint Information Protection: 4-12 months. Plan implementation as a security + IT + legal + compliance collaboration; data-discovery is often the gating step.
What is SASE/SSE-integrated DLP and when does it fit?
SASE (Secure Access Service Edge) and SSE (Security Service Edge) platforms (Netskope, Zscaler, Cisco Secure Access, Palo Alto Prisma Access) integrate DLP alongside CASB, ZTNA, SWG, and FWaaS on a single cloud-native platform. For organizations adopting SSE architecture, integrated SSE-DLP (Netskope DLP, Forcepoint ONE) reduces operational overhead versus standalone DLP plus separate CASB plus separate ZTNA. For organizations preserving best-of-breed point products, standalone DLP (Microsoft Purview, Forcepoint DLP, Symantec DLP) remains the right choice.
How is AI changing DLP?
AI is reshaping DLP at three layers: (1) Content detection: machine-learning-driven sensitive-data detection beyond rule-based patterns (Microsoft Purview AI, Nightfall AI, BigID AI). (2) Policy authoring: AI-driven policy recommendations based on observed data flows (Microsoft Security Copilot, Forcepoint AI, Netskope AI). (3) Anomaly detection: AI-driven detection of unusual data-movement patterns indicating insider risk or exfiltration (Code42 Incydr AI, Symantec DLP AI). The role is shifting from rule-based content-inspection toward judgment-driven risk strategy and anomaly investigation.
What is data-discovery-led DLP?
Data-discovery-led DLP (BigID, OneTrust Data Discovery, Spirion) inverts the traditional DLP model: discover sensitive data across the estate first (PII, PCI, regulated data inventories), classify it, then integrate with downstream DLP platforms for enforcement. Best fit when you do not know where your sensitive data lives across cloud + on-prem estates. Traditional DLP (Forcepoint, Symantec, Microsoft Purview) requires you to write content-inspection policies upfront, which is hard if you do not have a data inventory.
What about endpoint DLP for Mac?
Endpoint DLP for Mac has historically lagged Windows coverage but improved significantly 2023-2026. Microsoft Purview Endpoint DLP for Mac reached general availability September 2025. Endpoint Protector (cross-platform native), Forcepoint DLP (Mac coverage strong), Symantec DLP (Mac coverage available), Trellix DLP (Mac coverage available). For Mac-heavy fleets (creative agencies, modern tech companies), evaluate Endpoint Protector or Microsoft Purview first; legacy enterprise DLP vendors have Mac coverage but UI and management workflows often Windows-first.
Do I need a dedicated DLP platform plus separate insider-risk-management?
It depends on program scope. Mid-market (1500-5000 employees) often runs one platform handling DLP + insider-risk (Code42 Incydr for insider-risk-focused; Microsoft Purview for content-inspection-focused). Upper-mid-market and enterprise (5000+ employees) often run both: a content-inspection DLP platform (Microsoft Purview, Forcepoint, Symantec) plus a dedicated insider-risk-management platform (Code42 Incydr, Proofpoint ITM). The decision depends on whether your security team prioritizes content-inspection enforcement or user-behavior risk-scoring.

Final word

Looking at a different market? See the global Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Software ranking, or pick another country at the top of this page.

Last updated 2026-05-24. Local pricing reverified quarterly. Found something inaccurate? Tell us.