Skip to content
Z Zendikt
United Kingdom edition · 10 products ranked · Verified 2026-05-17

Top 10 CSPM Software in the United Kingdom for 2026

Independent UK CSPM ranking: NCSC cloud guidance, CAF, FCA operational resilience, NHS regulated workload migration, UK fintech Wiz dominance.

United Kingdom verdict (TL;DR)

Verified 2026-05-17

UK CSPM adoption is driven by two distinct forces: FCA operational resilience requirements pulling UK financial services toward enterprise CNAPP (Wiz dominant in UK fintech), and NHS/public sector movement of regulated workloads to AWS GovCloud and Azure UK with Defender for Cloud as the compliance default. Wiz is the dominant CSPM at UK fintech (Monzo, Revolut, Starling, Wise, Checkout.com, GoCardless); the UK fintech cohort has effectively become a Wiz reference cluster. Microsoft Defender for Cloud leads NHS, central government, and UK enterprise on Azure. Palo Alto Prisma Cloud covers UK FTSE 100 multinationals on Palo Alto network. The NCSC Cloud Security Principles (14 principles) and the Cyber Assessment Framework (CAF) are the primary UK compliance frameworks driving CSPM procurement in regulated sectors.

Picks for United Kingdom

  • UK fintech and fast-growing tech scaleups (Monzo, Revolut, Wise, Starling-tier): wiz Dominant at UK fintech. Monzo, Revolut, Wise, Checkout.com, GoCardless publicly reference Wiz. Agentless deployment speed suits fast-moving UK tech engineering teams. GBP billing via UK reseller available.
  • NHS, UK central government, and public sector on Azure: defender-cloud NHS England moving regulated workloads to Azure UK with Defender for Cloud. NCSC-endorsed Microsoft security posture. Bundled with Azure subscriptions. DSPT-compatible configuration guidance available from NCSC.
  • UK FTSE 100 multinationals on Palo Alto network stack: palo-alto-prisma-cloud Tight Palo Alto firewall and SASE integration. Default for UK FTSE 100 enterprises already standardized on Palo Alto. Palo Alto UK enterprise sales strong.
  • UK financial services firms under FCA operational resilience (non-fintech): wiz FCA SS1/21 requires continuous cloud risk management for important business services. Wiz's attack-path analysis and real-time misconfiguration detection provides the audit trail for FCA review.
  • UK security teams resistant to agent rollouts (mid-market): orca-security Agentless SideScanning. Good for UK 200-2,000 employee mid-market organizations with thin security teams. GBP billing via UK reseller.
Market context

How the cloud security posture management (cspm) market looks in United Kingdom

UK CSPM adoption has been shaped by two dominant forces: the FCA operational resilience regime and the NHS cloud migration.

UK fintech has become the global showcase for Wiz adoption. The cohort of UK unicorns and high-growth fintech (Monzo, Revolut, Starling, Wise, Checkout.com, GoCardless, Marshmallow, Zopa, OakNorth) has almost uniformly deployed Wiz as their CSPM/CNAPP platform. These are AWS and GCP-primary multi-cloud environments with security teams that value agentless rollout speed and graph-based attack path analysis. This cluster's public Wiz references have created strong UK fintech market pull that continues to drive Wiz adoption among Series B+ UK tech companies.

FCA's PS21/3 (Policy Statement on Operational Resilience, March 2021) and subsequent SS1/21 supervisory statement require UK financial services firms to map important business services, set impact tolerances, and test recovery. Cloud configuration risk is explicitly a component of operational resilience. FCA has issued findings from operational resilience assessments citing inadequate cloud visibility as a weakness. This has driven CSPM procurement at UK banks, insurers, and investment managers beyond just fintech.

NHS England's NHS Cloud Strategy and the movement of regulated NHS workloads to AWS GovCloud UK and Azure UK has elevated Defender for Cloud's position in NHS procurement. NHS Digital's DSPT (Data Security and Protection Toolkit) standard requires cloud-hosted NHS data to be protected at defined security levels; Microsoft Azure UK combined with Defender for Cloud is the most prescriptive and validated solution for NHS compliance. Some NHS Trusts have deployed Wiz alongside Defender for Cloud for multi-cloud visibility.

The NCSC Cloud Security Principles (14 principles, now aligned to CAF) are the primary UK cloud governance framework. CSPM platforms that can auto-map findings to NCSC principles (Wiz, Prisma Cloud, Defender for Cloud) have procurement advantage in UK regulated procurement.

Compliance & local rules

NCSC Cloud Security Principles (14 principles): CSPM findings should map to NCSC principles; Wiz, Prisma Cloud, and Defender for Cloud have NCSC-mapped policy packs. Cyber Assessment Framework (CAF): UK NIS Regulations 2018 compliance for Operators of Essential Services requires CAF assessment; cloud security posture management maps to CAF objective B.3 (identity and access control) and B.4 (data security). FCA SS1/21: cloud configuration risk management required for important business services; CSPM provides the continuous monitoring required for FCA resilience testing evidence. NHS DSPT: cloud-hosted NHS data must meet DSPT security standards; Microsoft Azure UK + Defender for Cloud is the validated NHS path; Wiz is increasingly accepted alongside. UK GDPR (DPA 2018): cloud misconfigurations exposing personal data constitute data breaches requiring ICO notification within 72 hours; CSPM misconfiguration detection reduces breach notification risk. PCI DSS 4.0: UK payment processors and acquirers need cloud workload scanning for cardholder data environment; Wiz, Prisma Cloud, and Defender for Cloud have PCI content packs. DORA (effective January 2025, UK equivalent expected): ICT risk management including cloud security posture increasingly required for UK financial services under FCA alignment.

At a glance

Quick comparison, ranked for United Kingdom

Product Best for Starts at 10-emp/mo* Pricing G2 Geo
1 Wiz
Mid-market to large multi-cloud enterprises
Quote - 4.7 Global; strongest in US, EU, UK, Israel, AU
3 Microsoft Defender for Cloud
Azure-anchored organizations
$0 + $0/emp $0 4.4 Global; strongest in US, EU, AU; worldwide
2 Palo Alto Prisma Cloud
Palo Alto-anchored enterprises
Quote - 4.4 Global; strongest in US, EU, UK, AU
5 Orca Security
Multi-cloud DevOps-heavy organizations
Quote - 4.6 Global; strongest in US, EU, Israel, AU
9 CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security
CrowdStrike-anchored enterprises
Quote - 4.5 Global; strongest in US, EU, UK, AU
6 Sysdig
Kubernetes-heavy and container-first organizations
Quote - 4.5 Global; strongest in US, EU, UK
7 Aqua Security
Kubernetes-heavy and supply-chain-conscious organizations
Quote - 4.4 Global; strongest in US, EU, Israel, UK
8 Tenable Cloud Security
CIEM-led enterprises and Tenable customers
Quote - 4.4 Global; strongest in US, EU, UK
4 Lacework
Existing Lacework customers and Fortinet-anchored enterprises
Quote - 4.3 Global; strongest in US, EU
10 Check Point CloudGuard
Check Point-anchored enterprises
Quote - 4.4 Global; strongest in EU, US, Israel, AU

*10-employee monthly cost = base fee + (per-employee × 10) using the lowest published tier. For opaque-pricing vendors, no value is shown.

Verified local pricing

What buyers in United Kingdom actually pay

Median annual deal size by employee band, in GBP. Crowdsourced from anonymized buyer disclosures.

Product Employee band Median annual (GBP) Sample Notes
Wiz 200-2,500 employees (UK fintech/tech scaleup) £76,000 58 Wiz Essential; GBP-billed via UK reseller; fintech typical
Wiz 2,500-10,000 employees (FTSE enterprise) £280,000 34 Wiz Advanced CNAPP; GBP enterprise
Microsoft Defender for Cloud 500-5,000 Azure resources (NHS/public sector) £28,000 87 Defender for Cloud P2; Azure UK region; GBP via EA
Palo Alto Prisma Cloud 1,000-10,000 cloud workloads (FTSE 100) £190,000 28 Prisma Cloud CNAPP; GBP via Palo Alto UK
Orca Security 200-2,500 cloud assets (UK mid-market) £58,000 31 Orca Platform; GBP via UK reseller
Local challengers

United Kingdom-built or United Kingdom-strong vendors worth knowing

Not yet ranked in our global top 10, but credible options for United Kingdom buyers and worth a shortlist.

Darktrace

Visit ↗

Cambridge-founded. AI-driven threat detection across cloud and network. Not a traditional CSPM but cloud anomaly detection used alongside Wiz or Defender for Cloud at UK FTSE 250 and financial services. London Stock Exchange listed.

Snyk

Visit ↗

London-founded (now US-incorporated). Developer security platform with cloud security (Snyk Cloud/IaC). Not a full CNAPP but strong ASPM/shift-left that UK product companies use alongside CSPM. Widely adopted at UK SaaS companies.

Wiz (UK reference cluster)

Visit ↗

Though US-headquartered, Wiz's UK fintech reference cluster (Monzo, Revolut, Wise, Checkout.com, GoCardless) is the strongest per-market reference cluster of any CSPM vendor globally. GBP billing available via UK reseller.

The United Kingdom ranking

All 10, ranked for United Kingdom

Same intelligence as the global ranking, vendor trust, review patterns, verified pricing, compliance, reordered for the United Kingdom market.

#1

Wiz

CNAPP market leader on agentless scanning depth and time-to-value.

Founded 2020 · New York, NY · private · 500–500,000+ employees
G2 4.7 (740)
Capterra 4.7
Custom quote
○ Sales call required
Visit Wiz

Wiz is the CNAPP market leader, founded 2020 by ex-Microsoft Cloud Security Group executives (Assaf Rappaport and team, formerly of Adallom). The product's strengths: agentless graph-based scanning that maps cloud resources, identities, vulnerabilities, and exposures into a single attack graph (the "Wiz Security Graph"), fastest time-to-value in the category (most customers report meaningful findings within 24-48 hours of connection), and the broadest CNAPP coverage (CSPM + CWPP + CIEM + KSPM + DSPM in one platform). Best fit for 500-50,000+ employee enterprises running multi-cloud workloads. The company crossed $1B ARR in 2024, fastest in software history, and famously declined a $32B all-cash acquisition offer from Google in August 2024 to remain independent and pursue an IPO path. Trade-offs: pricing has escalated meaningfully and is opaque, runtime detection is newer than agent-based competitors (Sysdig, CrowdStrike), and the agentless architecture means some real-time response actions are weaker than agent-based platforms.

Best for

Mid-market to large enterprises (500-50,000+ employees) running multi-cloud (AWS + Azure + GCP) workloads, prioritizing agentless rollout speed and broadest CNAPP coverage in a single platform.

Worst for

Microsoft Azure-only shops (Defender for Cloud bundled cheaper), CrowdStrike-anchored enterprises (Falcon Cloud Security tighter integration), buyers requiring on-prem coverage, or budget-constrained SMBs (Defender for Cloud or open-source alternatives cheaper).

Strengths

  • Agentless graph-based scanning (Wiz Security Graph)
  • Fastest time-to-value in CNAPP category (24-48 hours)
  • Broadest CNAPP coverage (CSPM + CWPP + CIEM + KSPM + DSPM)
  • Made for 500-50,000+ employee multi-cloud enterprises
  • Crossed $1B ARR in 2024, fastest in software history
  • Independent path post-Google deal collapse

Weaknesses

  • Pricing escalated meaningfully and opaque
  • Runtime detection newer than Sysdig / CrowdStrike
  • Agentless architecture limits some real-time response actions
  • Per-module pricing creates surprise costs for full CNAPP
  • Customer success quality variable as company scaled rapidly
  • Limited on-prem / hybrid coverage (cloud-only architecture)

Pricing tiers

opaque
  • Wiz Essential
    CSPM only; ~$30K-$80K starting
    Quote
  • Wiz Advanced
    Adds CWPP + CIEM; $80K-$200K typical
    Quote
  • Wiz CNAPP
    Full platform; $200K-$1M+ enterprise
    Quote
  • Wiz Code
    Add-on; ASPM and shift-left
    Quote
  • Wiz Defend
    Add-on; runtime detection
    Quote
Watch for
  • · Per-module pricing for Code, Defend, Sensor
  • · Annual price increases of 10-20% reported
  • · Workload-unit definition can shift at renewal
  • · Onboarding fees ($10K-$100K)

Key features

  • +Wiz Security Graph (agentless attack-path analysis)
  • +Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM)
  • +Cloud Workload Protection (CWPP)
  • +Cloud Infrastructure Entitlement Management (CIEM)
  • +Kubernetes Security Posture Management (KSPM)
  • +Data Security Posture Management (DSPM)
  • +Wiz Defend (runtime sensor; newer)
  • +Wiz Code (ASPM; shift-left)
200+ integrations
AWSMicrosoft AzureGoogle CloudKubernetesServiceNowJira
Geography
Global; strongest in US, EU, UK, Israel, AU
#3

Microsoft Defender for Cloud

De facto default for Azure-anchored organizations.

Founded 2015 · Redmond, WA · public · 1–500,000+ employees
G2 4.4 (1,840)
Capterra 4.5
From $0 + $0 /mo + /employee
● Transparent pricing
Visit Microsoft Defender for Cloud

Microsoft Defender for Cloud (formerly Azure Security Center, with Azure Defender bundled in 2021 and rebranded fully in 2022) is the CNAPP product native to Azure and extending to AWS and Google Cloud. The product's strengths: bundled foundational posture management with any Azure subscription at no extra cost, native integration with Microsoft Sentinel SIEM and Entra ID, and per-resource pricing that scales smoothly. Best fit for any Azure-anchored organization. Distinct from Microsoft Defender for Endpoint (covered in our EDR ranking under `defender-endpoint`). Trade-offs: outside the Azure ecosystem the product is meaningfully weaker than Wiz / Prisma Cloud, multi-cloud (AWS, GCP) coverage less mature than Azure-native, and the management UX (Defender for Cloud blade in Azure Portal) is fragmented across multiple panes.

Best for

Any organization on Microsoft Azure (foundational CSPM essentially free at zero marginal cost), particularly Azure-heavy enterprises and Microsoft Sentinel SIEM customers.

Worst for

AWS-only or GCP-only shops (Wiz / Prisma Cloud better multi-cloud), buyers prioritizing fastest time-to-value (Wiz / Orca better), or non-Microsoft enterprises.

Strengths

  • Bundled foundational CSPM with any Azure subscription
  • Native Microsoft Sentinel + Entra ID + Azure integration
  • Per-resource pricing scales smoothly
  • Fits Azure-anchored organizations
  • FedRAMP High authorized
  • Public company financial transparency

Weaknesses

  • Outside Azure ecosystem meaningfully weaker
  • AWS and GCP coverage less mature than Azure-native
  • Management UX fragmented across Azure Portal panes
  • Some advanced features require Defender CSPM or per-resource plans
  • Customer support quality varies by region

Pricing tiers

public
  • Foundational CSPM
    Free; bundled with Azure subscription
    $0+$0 /mo +/emp
  • Defender CSPM
    Per billable resource per month; advanced posture, agentless scanning, attack path
    $5 /mo
  • Defender for Servers P2
    Per server per month; full CWPP with MDE integration
    $15 /mo
  • Defender for Containers
    Per vCore per month; Kubernetes and container protection
    $7 /mo
  • Defender for Storage / SQL / Key Vault / etc.
    Per-resource per-event pricing
    Quote
Watch for
  • · Per-resource pricing can balloon at scale
  • · Defender CSPM separate from foundational
  • · Sentinel ingestion charged separately
  • · Annual Azure consumption price increases

Key features

  • +Foundational CSPM (free)
  • +Defender CSPM (advanced posture, agentless scanning, attack path)
  • +Defender for Servers (CWPP via Defender for Endpoint integration)
  • +Defender for Containers (Kubernetes posture and runtime)
  • +Defender for Storage / SQL / Key Vault / DNS
  • +Multi-cloud connectors (AWS, GCP)
  • +Native Microsoft Sentinel integration
  • +Azure-native compliance dashboards
300+ integrations
Microsoft AzureAWSGoogle CloudMicrosoft SentinelEntra IDGitHub
Geography
Global; strongest in US, EU, AU; worldwide
#2

Palo Alto Prisma Cloud

CNAPP for Palo Alto network security stack consolidation.

Founded 2019 · Santa Clara, CA · public · 1,000–500,000+ employees
G2 4.4 (1,180)
Capterra 4.5
Custom quote
○ Sales call required
Visit Palo Alto Prisma Cloud

Palo Alto Prisma Cloud is the CNAPP product from Palo Alto Networks, built primarily through the 2019 acquisitions of RedLock (CSPM) and Twistlock (container security), and expanded with PureSec (serverless), Bridgecrew (IaC scanning), and Cider (CI/CD security). The product's primary advantage: tight integration with Palo Alto firewalls, Prisma SASE, and Cortex XDR, making it the default for buyers consolidating around Palo Alto. Best fit for enterprises 1,000+ employees committed to Palo Alto network security. Trade-offs: outside the Palo Alto ecosystem the product is less compelling than Wiz on time-to-value, the multi-product heritage shows as integration friction inside Prisma Cloud itself, and pricing meaningful at scale. Distinct from Cortex XDR (covered separately in our EDR ranking), Cortex XDR covers endpoint, Prisma Cloud covers cloud workloads and posture.

Best for

Enterprises (1,000-50,000+ employees) committed to Palo Alto network security wanting unified CNAPP + network + SASE + Cortex XDR platform.

Worst for

Non-Palo Alto shops (Wiz / Orca better time-to-value), Microsoft Azure-only shops (Defender for Cloud bundled), or buyers prioritizing rapid agentless deployment.

Strengths

  • Tight integration with Palo Alto firewalls and Cortex XDR
  • Mature CNAPP breadth (RedLock + Twistlock + Bridgecrew heritage)
  • Best for Palo Alto-anchored enterprise stacks
  • Public company financial transparency
  • Strong threat intelligence (Unit 42)
  • On-prem and hybrid coverage stronger than Wiz

Weaknesses

  • Outside Palo Alto ecosystem less compelling than Wiz
  • Multi-product heritage shows as integration friction
  • Time-to-value slower than Wiz / Orca
  • Pricing meaningful at scale and opaque
  • Innovation pace slower than Wiz
  • Management UX (Prisma Cloud) has steep learning curve

Pricing tiers

opaque
  • Prisma Cloud Foundations
    CSPM only; ~$30K-$60K starting
    Quote
  • Prisma Cloud Business
    Adds CWPP; $60K-$200K typical
    Quote
  • Prisma Cloud Enterprise
    Full CNAPP; $200K-$1M+ enterprise
    Quote
  • Cortex Cloud (XSIAM bundle)
    Cloud detection consolidated into Cortex platform
    Quote
Watch for
  • · Per-cloud-credit pricing model can shift at renewal
  • · Implementation fee ($25K-$200K)
  • · Annual price increases of 8-12%
  • · Cortex Cloud separate purchase

Key features

  • +CSPM (multi-cloud posture)
  • +CWPP (workload protection from Twistlock)
  • +CIEM (cloud entitlements)
  • +IaC security (Bridgecrew)
  • +CI/CD security (Cider)
  • +Container and Kubernetes security
  • +Web application and API security (WAAS)
  • +Unit 42 threat intelligence integration
250+ integrations
AWSMicrosoft AzureGoogle CloudKubernetesPalo Alto firewallsCortex XDR
Geography
Global; strongest in US, EU, UK, AU
#5

Orca Security

Agentless CSPM pioneer with SideScanning architecture.

Founded 2019 · Portland, OR · private · 500–25,000 employees
G2 4.6 (480)
Capterra 4.6
Custom quote
○ Sales call required
Visit Orca Security

Orca Security is the agentless CSPM pioneer, founded 2019 by ex-Check Point executives. The product's primary differentiator: SideScanning, a patented agentless architecture that scans cloud workloads via runtime block storage snapshots without requiring agents or network connectors. Orca and Wiz are both agentless CNAPP, and the two have spent meaningful resources publicly contesting patent and architecture claims. Best fit for security teams resistant to agent rollouts and DevOps-heavy organizations wanting comprehensive coverage without endpoint friction. Trade-offs: Wiz has out-marketed Orca on time-to-value despite similar architectures, brand momentum has slowed relative to Wiz, runtime detection is newer than agent-based competitors, and pricing has crept up under growth pressure. Some customer churn to Wiz reported in 2024-2025.

Best for

Security teams (500-25,000 employees) prioritizing comprehensive multi-cloud coverage without agent rollouts, particularly DevOps-heavy organizations resistant to endpoint agents.

Worst for

Wiz-evaluated buyers who already chose Wiz, Microsoft Azure-only shops (Defender for Cloud bundled), or buyers prioritizing tightest runtime detection.

Strengths

  • SideScanning agentless architecture (patented)
  • Built for security teams resistant to agent rollouts
  • Comprehensive cloud workload visibility without agents
  • Multi-cloud coverage across AWS, Azure, GCP, OCI, Alibaba
  • Mature CNAPP feature set (CSPM + CWPP + CIEM + KSPM + DSPM)
  • Founder-led with strong VC backing

Weaknesses

  • Brand momentum slowed relative to Wiz
  • Some customer churn to Wiz reported 2024-2025
  • Runtime detection newer than agent-based competitors
  • Pricing crept up under growth pressure
  • Customer success quality variable as company scaled
  • Public Wiz patent and architecture disputes have been distracting

Pricing tiers

opaque
  • Orca Premium
    ~$30K-$80K starting; CSPM + CWPP + CIEM
    Quote
  • Orca Enterprise
    $80K-$300K typical; full CNAPP
    Quote
  • Orca Sensor (runtime)
    Add-on; runtime detection
    Quote
Watch for
  • · Per-asset pricing can shift at renewal
  • · Implementation fee ($10K-$50K)
  • · Annual price increases of 8-15%
  • · Sensor add-on for runtime

Key features

  • +SideScanning agentless architecture
  • +CSPM (multi-cloud posture)
  • +CWPP (workload protection)
  • +CIEM (cloud entitlements)
  • +KSPM (Kubernetes posture)
  • +DSPM (data security posture)
  • +Orca Sensor (runtime detection; newer)
  • +Attack path analysis
180+ integrations
AWSMicrosoft AzureGoogle CloudOracle CloudKubernetesServiceNow
Geography
Global; strongest in US, EU, Israel, AU
#9

CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security

Cloud module of the Falcon platform, default for CrowdStrike-anchored buyers.

Founded 2018 · Austin, TX · public · 1,000–500,000+ employees
G2 4.5 (480)
Capterra 4.6
Custom quote
○ Sales call required
Visit CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security

CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security is the cloud module of the Falcon platform, the EDR/XDR market leader covered separately in our Top 10 EDR / Endpoint Security Software ranking under `crowdstrike`. The product extends CrowdStrike's endpoint dominance into CNAPP, primarily through the 2021 Humio acquisition (data lake foundation) and the 2024 Flow Security acquisition for DSPM ($200M). Best fit for enterprises already running Falcon for endpoint who want cloud security on the same platform and console. Trade-offs: outside the CrowdStrike ecosystem the product is less compelling than Wiz / Orca, time-to-value slower than agentless competitors, the broader CrowdStrike trust impact from the July 2024 Falcon Sensor channel-file outage extends to customer perception of cloud security expansion, and pricing meaningful at scale. The cloud module is genuinely strong but rarely a standalone purchase decision, it sells via Falcon platform expansion.

Best for

Enterprises (1,000-50,000+ employees) already running CrowdStrike Falcon for endpoint, wanting cloud security on the same platform and console with unified threat intelligence.

Worst for

Non-CrowdStrike enterprises (Wiz / Orca better standalone), Microsoft Defender for Endpoint shops (Defender for Cloud bundled), or buyers prioritizing fastest agentless time-to-value.

Strengths

  • Tight integration with Falcon endpoint platform
  • Made for CrowdStrike-anchored enterprise stacks
  • Mature DSPM via Flow Security acquisition (2024)
  • Strong threat intelligence (CrowdStrike Intelligence + Overwatch)
  • Public company financial transparency
  • Single-agent and agentless hybrid architecture

Weaknesses

  • Outside CrowdStrike ecosystem less compelling than Wiz/Orca
  • Time-to-value slower than agentless competitors
  • July 2024 Falcon outage trust impact extends to platform expansion
  • Pricing meaningful at scale and per-module
  • Rarely a standalone purchase, sells via Falcon expansion
  • Cloud-only architecture limits hybrid coverage

Pricing tiers

opaque
  • Falcon Cloud Security CSPM
    ~$25K-$60K starting; CSPM only
    Quote
  • Falcon Cloud Security Advanced
    $60K-$200K typical; CSPM + CWPP + CIEM
    Quote
  • Falcon Cloud Security Enterprise
    $200K-$1M+; full CNAPP including DSPM
    Quote
Watch for
  • · Per-module pricing within Falcon platform adds up
  • · Implementation fee ($10K-$100K)
  • · Annual price increases of 8-12% reported
  • · Often bundled with Falcon endpoint at platform discount

Key features

  • +CSPM (multi-cloud posture)
  • +CWPP (workload protection via Falcon Sensor)
  • +CIEM (cloud entitlements)
  • +KSPM (Kubernetes posture)
  • +DSPM (Flow Security acquisition)
  • +Container and Kubernetes runtime
  • +Native Falcon endpoint integration
  • +CrowdStrike Intelligence + Overwatch threat hunting
250+ integrations
AWSMicrosoft AzureGoogle CloudKubernetesFalcon EndpointSplunk
Geography
Global; strongest in US, EU, UK, AU
#6

Sysdig

Falco-anchored runtime detection plus full CNAPP.

Founded 2013 · San Francisco, CA · private · 500–50,000+ employees
G2 4.5 (380)
Capterra 4.6
Custom quote
○ Sales call required
Visit Sysdig

Sysdig is the CNAPP product anchored on Falco, the open-source runtime security project Sysdig created in 2016 and donated to the CNCF in 2018 (now graduated). The product's primary advantage: deepest runtime detection in the category, particularly for Kubernetes and container workloads, built on the same eBPF-based instrumentation that powers Falco. Founded 2013 by Loris Degioanni (creator of WinPcap and co-creator of Wireshark). Best fit for Kubernetes-heavy stacks where runtime detection is the primary use case and posture is secondary. Trade-offs: agent-based architecture means slower time-to-value than Wiz / Orca, posture (CSPM) capabilities less mature than runtime, and pricing meaningful at scale. Sysdig's 555-rule and "5/5/5" benchmark for cloud detection (5 seconds detect, 5 minutes triage, 5 minutes respond) is widely cited but operationally aggressive.

Best for

Kubernetes-heavy and container-first organizations (500-25,000+ employees) where runtime detection is the primary use case and CSPM is secondary, particularly cloud-native engineering cultures.

Worst for

Posture-only buyers (Wiz / Orca / Defender for Cloud cheaper), agentless-first organizations, or buyers without significant Kubernetes investment.

Strengths

  • Deepest runtime detection in CNAPP category
  • Falco-anchored open-source heritage and ecosystem
  • Best for Kubernetes-heavy and container-first stacks
  • eBPF-based instrumentation (low overhead)
  • Mature CWPP and KSPM capabilities
  • Founder-led; strong open-source community engagement

Weaknesses

  • Agent-based architecture slower time-to-value than Wiz/Orca
  • Posture (CSPM) capabilities less mature than runtime
  • Pricing meaningful at scale and opaque
  • Multi-cloud coverage less mature than dedicated CSPM vendors
  • Uneven support quality as company scaled
  • Outside Kubernetes-heavy stacks less compelling

Pricing tiers

opaque
  • Sysdig Secure
    ~$60-$120/host/year typical
    Quote
  • Sysdig Secure CNAPP
    Full CNAPP; $80K-$300K typical
    Quote
  • Sysdig Monitor (observability)
    Separate; bundled discount available
    Quote
Watch for
  • · Per-host or per-resource pricing can balloon
  • · Implementation fee ($10K-$75K)
  • · Annual price increases of 6-10%
  • · Monitor and Secure billed separately

Key features

  • +Falco-based runtime detection (eBPF)
  • +CWPP (workload protection)
  • +CSPM (multi-cloud posture)
  • +KSPM (Kubernetes posture)
  • +CIEM (cloud entitlements)
  • +Container vulnerability scanning
  • +Sysdig Inspect (forensics)
  • +Sysdig Monitor (observability bundle)
200+ integrations
AWSMicrosoft AzureGoogle CloudKubernetesOpenShiftSplunk
Geography
Global; strongest in US, EU, UK
#7

Aqua Security

Container and Kubernetes-anchored CNAPP with Trivy heritage.

Founded 2015 · Ramat Gan, Israel · private · 500–25,000 employees
G2 4.4 (280)
Capterra 4.5
Custom quote
○ Sales call required
Visit Aqua Security

Aqua Security is the container and Kubernetes-anchored CNAPP product, founded 2015 in Israel. The product's strengths: deepest container and Kubernetes security heritage in the category (predates the CNAPP category itself), Trivy as the most-deployed open-source vulnerability scanner (Aqua acquired Trivy creator Aqua Open Source in 2020), and strong fit for buyers with container workloads as the primary attack surface. Best fit for Kubernetes-heavy and supply-chain-conscious organizations. Trade-offs: outside container and Kubernetes use cases the product is less compelling than Wiz / Orca, IPO talks reported in 2024-2025 have not yet materialized into a public listing, brand momentum has slowed relative to Wiz, and multi-cloud posture (CSPM) capabilities less mature than container-native features.

Best for

Kubernetes-heavy and container-first organizations (500-25,000+ employees) prioritizing supply-chain security, vulnerability management, and container/K8s as the primary attack surface.

Worst for

Posture-only buyers (Wiz / Orca better), Microsoft Azure-only shops (Defender for Cloud bundled), or buyers without significant container investment.

Strengths

  • Deepest container and Kubernetes security heritage
  • Trivy open-source vulnerability scanner ownership
  • Fits supply-chain-conscious organizations
  • Mature CWPP and KSPM capabilities
  • Multi-cloud and hybrid coverage
  • Israeli engineering depth

Weaknesses

  • Outside container/K8s use cases less compelling
  • IPO talks reported but not yet realized
  • Brand momentum slowed relative to Wiz
  • CSPM capabilities less mature than container-native
  • Support depends on tier
  • Pricing meaningful at scale

Pricing tiers

opaque
  • Aqua CNAPP Standard
    ~$40K-$100K starting; CSPM + CWPP
    Quote
  • Aqua CNAPP Advanced
    $100K-$400K typical; full CNAPP
    Quote
  • Aqua Enterprise
    Custom; advanced supply chain and runtime
    Quote
Watch for
  • · Per-workload pricing can shift at renewal
  • · Implementation fee ($15K-$75K)
  • · Annual price increases of 6-10%
  • · Trivy Enterprise separate from open-source

Key features

  • +Container and Kubernetes security (heritage)
  • +Trivy vulnerability scanner (open-source)
  • +CSPM (multi-cloud posture)
  • +CWPP (workload protection)
  • +CIEM (cloud entitlements)
  • +Supply chain security
  • +Aqua Enforcer runtime protection
  • +eBPF-based runtime detection
170+ integrations
AWSMicrosoft AzureGoogle CloudKubernetesOpenShiftJenkins
Geography
Global; strongest in US, EU, Israel, UK
#8

Tenable Cloud Security

CIEM-led CNAPP built on Ermetic foundation.

Founded 2002 · Columbia, MD · public · 1,000–500,000+ employees
G2 4.4 (380)
Capterra 4.5
Custom quote
○ Sales call required
Visit Tenable Cloud Security

Tenable Cloud Security is the CNAPP product from Tenable (the Nessus / Tenable.io vulnerability management leader), built primarily on the October 2023 acquisition of Ermetic for $265M. The product's primary advantage: deepest CIEM (cloud infrastructure entitlement management) capabilities in the category, Ermetic was the leading CIEM-pure-play before the acquisition, and Tenable has retained that strength. Best fit for buyers leading with cloud identity governance and entitlement risk. Trade-offs: outside CIEM-led use cases the product is less compelling than Wiz / Orca, posture (CSPM) and runtime (CWPP) capabilities less mature than CIEM, and integration with broader Tenable vulnerability management is a work in progress. Public company financial transparency and breadth of customer base (Tenable serves 65% of Fortune 500) are meaningful differentiators.

Best for

Enterprises (1,000-50,000+ employees) leading with cloud identity governance and entitlement risk, particularly Tenable vulnerability management customers wanting unified VM + cloud security.

Worst for

CSPM-led or CWPP-led buyers (Wiz / Orca / Sysdig better), Microsoft Azure-only shops (Defender for Cloud bundled), or buyers without significant identity-led concerns.

Strengths

  • Deepest CIEM capabilities (Ermetic foundation)
  • Works for CIEM-led buyers
  • Public company financial transparency (Tenable)
  • Integration with Tenable vulnerability management
  • Mature compliance and audit reporting
  • Broad enterprise customer base (65% of Fortune 500)

Weaknesses

  • Outside CIEM-led use cases less compelling
  • Posture (CSPM) less mature than CIEM
  • Runtime (CWPP) capabilities thinner than Wiz / Sysdig
  • Integration with Tenable VM still in progress
  • Brand recognition lower in CNAPP than legacy VM
  • Innovation pace slower than Wiz

Pricing tiers

opaque
  • Tenable Cloud Security Essentials
    ~$30K-$80K starting; CIEM + CSPM
    Quote
  • Tenable Cloud Security Advanced
    $80K-$300K typical; full CNAPP
    Quote
  • Tenable One (unified)
    Custom; bundled with Tenable VM
    Quote
Watch for
  • · Per-resource pricing
  • · Implementation fee ($10K-$75K)
  • · Annual price increases of 6-10%
  • · Tenable One bundle commitment required for full discount

Key features

  • +CIEM (Ermetic foundation; deepest in category)
  • +CSPM (multi-cloud posture)
  • +CWPP (workload protection)
  • +KSPM (Kubernetes posture)
  • +IaC scanning
  • +Just-in-time access workflows
  • +Tenable Nessus vulnerability integration
  • +Compliance reporting (SOC 2, PCI, HIPAA, etc.)
200+ integrations
AWSMicrosoft AzureGoogle CloudTenable NessusServiceNowSplunk
Geography
Global; strongest in US, EU, UK
#4

Lacework

Polygraph data graph; post-Fortinet integration risk material.

Founded 2015 · San Jose, CA · public · 500–50,000 employees
G2 4.3 (580)
Capterra 4.4
Custom quote
○ Sales call required
Visit Lacework

Lacework is the CNAPP product anchored on its Polygraph Data Platform, a behavioral data graph that tracks cloud entities, processes, and network connections to detect anomalies. Founded 2015, the company peaked at an $8.3B valuation in November 2021 (largest cybersecurity Series D in history). The story since has been one of the most public valuation collapses in cybersecurity: meaningful layoffs in mid-2022 and 2023, and ultimately acquired by Fortinet in June 2024 in a fire-sale deal reported across multiple sources at $150M-$200M, roughly 2-3% of the 2021 peak. Trade-offs in 2026: the Polygraph technology remains genuinely strong for behavioral detection, but post-Fortinet integration direction is the single biggest risk in the category. Fortinet has positioned Lacework as the cloud module of FortiCNAPP, and roadmap clarity remains incomplete. Existing Lacework customers report uncertainty about long-term direction; new buyers have largely paused evaluation pending integration clarity.

Best for

Existing Lacework customers maintaining renewal, Fortinet-anchored enterprises (1,000+ employees) wanting unified FortiCNAPP + network security stack, or buyers specifically valuing Polygraph behavioral detection.

Worst for

Net-new CNAPP buyers (Wiz / Prisma Cloud / Defender for Cloud carry less acquisition risk), buyers concerned about vendor stability post-acquisition, or organizations not on Fortinet network security.

Strengths

  • Polygraph Data Platform (genuine behavioral graph technology)
  • Works for Fortinet-anchored enterprise stacks (post-2024)
  • Mature anomaly detection in cloud workloads
  • Fortinet financial backing stabilizes long-term outlook
  • Multi-cloud coverage across AWS, Azure, GCP
  • Container and Kubernetes runtime detection mature

Weaknesses

  • Acquired by Fortinet 2024 at ~2-3% of 2021 $8.3B peak, historic valuation collapse
  • Post-Fortinet integration roadmap incomplete
  • New buyer evaluation paused pending integration clarity
  • Engineering and product velocity slowed through acquisition
  • Customer support quality declined post-acquisition
  • Brand momentum severely damaged versus Wiz / Orca

Pricing tiers

opaque
  • Lacework FortiCNAPP Pro
    ~$40K-$120K starting; CSPM + CWPP
    Quote
  • Lacework FortiCNAPP Enterprise
    $120K-$500K typical; full CNAPP
    Quote
  • Bundled with Fortinet network
    Custom; unified FortiCNAPP + FortiGate stack
    Quote
Watch for
  • · Per-resource pricing can shift at renewal
  • · Implementation fee ($15K-$100K)
  • · Annual price increases reported post-acquisition
  • · Bundled pricing only with broader Fortinet commitment

Key features

  • +Polygraph Data Platform (behavioral graph)
  • +CSPM (multi-cloud posture)
  • +CWPP (workload protection)
  • +CIEM (cloud entitlements)
  • +Container and Kubernetes runtime detection
  • +IaC security (Soluble heritage)
  • +FortiCNAPP integration with FortiGate firewalls
  • +Anomaly-based threat detection
150+ integrations
AWSMicrosoft AzureGoogle CloudKubernetesFortiGate firewallsSplunk
Geography
Global; strongest in US, EU
#10

Check Point CloudGuard

CNAPP for Check Point-anchored network security stacks.

Founded 2010 · Tel Aviv, Israel · public · 1,000–500,000+ employees
G2 4.4 (380)
Capterra 4.5
Custom quote
○ Sales call required
Visit Check Point CloudGuard

Check Point CloudGuard is the CNAPP product from Check Point Software, built primarily on the 2019 acquisition of Dome9 (CSPM) and extended with Protego (serverless security) and Spectral (developer security, 2023). The product's primary advantage: tight integration with Check Point firewalls and the broader Check Point Infinity platform, making it the default for buyers consolidating around Check Point network security. Founded 1993, public on NASDAQ ($21B+ market cap). Best fit for enterprises 1,000+ employees committed to Check Point network security. Trade-offs: outside the Check Point ecosystem the product is less compelling than Wiz / Orca, time-to-value slower than agentless leaders, brand momentum in CNAPP has lagged the Check Point firewall heritage, and innovation pace slower than category leaders.

Best for

Enterprises (1,000-50,000+ employees) committed to Check Point network security wanting unified CloudGuard + firewall + Infinity platform consolidation.

Worst for

Non-Check Point shops (Wiz / Orca better), Microsoft Azure-only shops (Defender for Cloud bundled), or buyers prioritizing fastest agentless time-to-value.

Strengths

  • Tight integration with Check Point firewalls and Infinity platform
  • Right call for Check Point-anchored enterprise stacks
  • Mature CSPM via Dome9 heritage
  • Public company financial transparency
  • Fits compliance-heavy industries (Check Point's legacy strength)
  • Multi-cloud and hybrid coverage

Weaknesses

  • Outside Check Point ecosystem less compelling
  • Time-to-value slower than agentless leaders
  • Brand momentum in CNAPP lags firewall heritage
  • Innovation pace slower than Wiz / Orca
  • Support inconsistency reported
  • CIEM and DSPM capabilities thinner than category leaders

Pricing tiers

opaque
  • CloudGuard CSPM
    ~$25K-$60K starting; posture only
    Quote
  • CloudGuard CNAPP
    $60K-$200K typical; full CNAPP
    Quote
  • CloudGuard Network
    Add-on; cloud network security
    Quote
  • Bundled with Infinity
    Custom; full Check Point platform
    Quote
Watch for
  • · Per-asset pricing
  • · Implementation fee ($15K-$100K)
  • · Annual price increases of 6-10%
  • · Multiple modules billed separately

Key features

  • +CSPM (Dome9 heritage)
  • +CWPP (workload protection)
  • +CIEM (cloud entitlements)
  • +KSPM (Kubernetes posture)
  • +IaC and code security (Spectral)
  • +CloudGuard Network Security
  • +Serverless security (Protego heritage)
  • +Check Point ThreatCloud intelligence integration
180+ integrations
AWSMicrosoft AzureGoogle CloudKubernetesCheck Point firewallsServiceNow
Geography
Global; strongest in EU, US, Israel, AU

Frequently asked questions

The questions buyers actually ask before they sign.

Which CSPM is best for NHS and UK public sector cloud deployments?
Microsoft Defender for Cloud is the default for NHS and UK public sector on Azure UK. It is bundled with Azure subscriptions, satisfies NCSC Cloud Security Principles mapping, and NHS Digital's DSPT guidance explicitly references Microsoft Azure UK + Defender for Cloud as a validated path for NHS data. For NHS organizations running workloads on AWS UK or GCP, Wiz provides multi-cloud coverage alongside Defender for Cloud. Wiz is increasingly accepted in NHS procurement frameworks via G-Cloud.
Why do UK fintech companies choose Wiz so consistently?
UK fintech companies (Monzo, Revolut, Wise, Starling, Checkout.com, GoCardless) have chosen Wiz for three consistent reasons: agentless deployment that does not require agent rollout across ephemeral cloud workloads, graph-based attack-path analysis that surfaces cloud-to-production risk in terms an engineering organization understands, and fast time-to-value (meaningful findings within 24-48 hours vs. weeks for agent-based alternatives). These are characteristics of cloud-native engineering organizations, not traditional IT. UK fintech security teams tend to be lean and technically sophisticated; Wiz fits this profile. The resulting UK fintech reference cluster has created powerful social proof that accelerates Wiz adoption in adjacent UK tech segments.
How does FCA operational resilience (SS1/21) drive CSPM requirements?
FCA SS1/21 requires UK financial services firms to identify important business services (IBS), set maximum tolerable disruption periods, and annually test their ability to remain within impact tolerances. Cloud misconfigurations (exposed storage buckets, excessive IAM permissions, unencrypted databases) can cause or accelerate incidents that breach impact tolerances. FCA examination findings have cited inadequate cloud visibility as a resilience gap. CSPM platforms that provide continuous misconfiguration detection and real-time alerting (Wiz, Defender for Cloud, Prisma Cloud) directly support FCA SS1/21 evidence requirements. Most FCA-supervised UK firms document CSPM coverage as part of their annual resilience testing reports.
Wiz vs Palo Alto Prisma Cloud, which one?
Wiz if your bottleneck is time-to-value, agentless deployment, and breadth across multi-cloud (AWS + Azure + GCP), Wiz consistently delivers meaningful findings within 24-48 hours of connection and the Security Graph attack-path analysis is best-in-class. Palo Alto Prisma Cloud if you are already standardized on Palo Alto firewalls, Prisma SASE, and Cortex XDR and want unified vendor consolidation. Both are credible at enterprise scale. Wiz declined Google's $32B acquisition offer in August 2024 and remains independent; Prisma Cloud carries roadmap uncertainty as Palo Alto consolidates detection capabilities into Cortex Cloud / XSIAM.
Why is Lacework still on this list given the Fortinet fire-sale?
Honesty: Lacework is here for completeness because the Polygraph Data Platform technology is genuinely strong and existing customers need to know how to think about renewal. We do not recommend Lacework for net-new evaluation in 2026 unless you are already standardized on Fortinet network security and want unified FortiCNAPP + FortiGate. The 2024 Fortinet acquisition at $150M-$200M against the 2021 $8.3B peak is one of the most public valuation collapses in cybersecurity history, and post-acquisition integration roadmap remains incomplete. Net-new buyers should evaluate Wiz, Orca, Prisma Cloud, or Defender for Cloud first.
When does Microsoft Defender for Cloud beat Wiz?
Microsoft Defender for Cloud wins for any organization on Microsoft Azure where foundational CSPM is the primary need, it's bundled at zero incremental cost, native to Microsoft Sentinel SIEM and Entra ID, and per-resource pricing scales smoothly. The economic lever is overwhelming for Azure-anchored shops doing CSPM-only. Wiz wins for multi-cloud (AWS + Azure + GCP), buyers prioritizing fastest agentless time-to-value, and enterprises wanting the broadest CNAPP coverage (CSPM + CWPP + CIEM + KSPM + DSPM) in a single platform with the strongest attack-path analysis.
How does this differ from your EDR ranking?
Our Top 10 EDR / Endpoint Security Software covers endpoint detection and response (CrowdStrike Falcon endpoint, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, etc.). CSPM/CNAPP (this ranking) covers cloud security posture, workload protection, identity entitlements, and Kubernetes for cloud-native environments. EDR + CNAPP are complementary, most enterprises run both. CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security and Microsoft Defender for Cloud appear here as the cloud modules of products covered separately as endpoint platforms; we use distinct product IDs (`crowdstrike-cloud-security` vs `crowdstrike`, `defender-cloud` vs `defender-endpoint`) where products span multiple categories.
How much should I budget for CNAPP?
Azure-only shop on foundational CSPM: $0 incremental (Defender for Cloud foundational free). Small multi-cloud (500-1,000 employees): $30K-$80K/year (Wiz Essential, Orca Premium, Defender CSPM advanced). Mid-market multi-cloud (1,000-5,000 employees): $80K-$200K/year (Wiz Advanced, Prisma Cloud Business, Tenable Cloud Security). Enterprise multi-cloud (5,000+ employees): $200K-$1M+/year (Wiz CNAPP, Prisma Cloud Enterprise, Falcon Cloud Security Enterprise). Add 30-50% for full CNAPP including CWPP runtime + DSPM + Kubernetes runtime detection.
How long does CNAPP rollout take?
Wiz, Orca (agentless): 1-4 weeks for initial coverage, 4-12 weeks for full operational maturity. Microsoft Defender for Cloud foundational: 1-2 weeks (auto-enabled with Azure). Prisma Cloud, Falcon Cloud Security, CloudGuard, Lacework: 8-16 weeks (multi-product integration, IaC pipelines, SOC playbooks). Sysdig and Aqua Security: 8-20 weeks for full Kubernetes runtime maturity. Plan for 90-180 days from contract to full SOC operational maturity for enterprise CNAPP deployments.
Agentless vs agent-based CNAPP, which architecture wins?
Both win for different jobs in 2026. Agentless (Wiz, Orca, Defender CSPM) wins for fastest time-to-value, broadest visibility without DevOps friction, and posture/configuration use cases. Agent-based (Sysdig, Aqua Security, CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud) wins for deepest runtime detection, real-time response actions, and Kubernetes runtime threat hunting. Most credible vendors now ship hybrid architectures, Wiz Defend, Orca Sensor, Prisma Cloud Defender, adding optional runtime sensors to agentless foundations. Evaluate by primary use case (posture-led vs runtime-led) rather than by architecture purity.
How do CNAPP vendor acquisitions affect selection?
The Lacework→Fortinet 2024 fire-sale (~$150M-$200M from a 2021 $8.3B peak), the Wiz→Google 2024 deal collapse ($32B declined), the Tenable→Ermetic 2023 acquisition ($265M for CIEM), and ongoing Aqua Security IPO talks have reset trust expectations in the category. After-action: (1) Verify the vendor's acquisition history and post-acquisition product velocity. (2) Require multi-year roadmap commitments in the contract. (3) Test exit clauses and data portability before signing. (4) Don't overweight vendor independence as a feature, Wiz is independent today but post-IPO trajectory is uncertain. Evaluate product fit first, vendor stability second.

Final word

Looking at a different market? See the global Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) ranking, or pick another country at the top of this page.

Last updated 2026-05-17. Local pricing reverified quarterly. Found something inaccurate? Tell us.