Canada verdict (TL;DR)
Verified 2026-05-27Canadian ATS buying defaults to Greenhouse for SaaS scale-ups and to Workday Recruiting for Big 5 banks, insurers and major retailers. Ashby and Lever take share at modern Toronto-Waterloo and Montreal SaaS firms (Shopify, 1Password, Coveo, Lightspeed, Wealthsimple). iCIMS holds enterprise installed base at Telus, Bell, Rogers and several federal Crown corps. SmartRecruiters wins bilingual EN/FR enterprise deals at CGI and Bombardier. Workable and Recruitee serve mid-market SMB. Bullhorn dominates Canadian staffing agencies. JazzHR covers SMB price-conscious buyers. Bill 96 mandates French job postings in Quebec; Loi 25 requires explicit consent and a PIA for candidate data; Ontario Bill 88 requires electronic monitoring disclosure for employers above 25 employees.
Picks for Canada
- Canadian SaaS scale-up 100-1000 employees, structured hiring: greenhouse Greenhouse is the modern Canadian SaaS scale-up default (Shopify, 1Password, Vidyard, Top Hat, Loopio, Lightspeed). Strong structured-interview discipline, native bilingual job postings for Bill 96, Canadian residency available.
- Big 5 bank, insurer or large retailer running Workday HCM: workday-recruiting Workday Recruiting is the standard at RBC, TD, Scotiabank, BMO, CIBC, Manulife, Sun Life, Loblaws and Sobeys where Workday HCM is the system of record. Single-vendor consolidation; bilingual EN/FR; Canadian residency.
- Hyper-data-driven Series B/C SaaS scale-up: ashby Ashby has won net-new Canadian SaaS deployments since 2023 (Cohere, several Y Combinator Canadian alumni). Strongest analytics in category, fast deploy, modern UX. Bilingual support; CAD billing emerging.
- Bilingual enterprise needing strong French + English recruiting flows: smartrecruiters SmartRecruiters has the strongest French UI and French candidate experience in the enterprise tier. Used at CGI, Bombardier, Desjardins and Quebec public sector. Native Bill 96 alignment.
- Telus, Bell, Rogers or federal Crown enterprise hiring: icims iCIMS has long Canadian enterprise installed base at Telus, Bell, Rogers, Air Canada and several Crown corporations. Mature bilingual handling, OSFI/Treasury Board-friendly third-party paper.
- Canadian staffing agency or executive search firm: bullhorn Bullhorn dominates Canadian staffing (Randstad Canada, Adecco, Robert Half Canada, hundreds of regional agencies). Built for high-volume requisition + placement workflows that generic ATS miss.
How the applicant tracking systems (ats) market looks in Canada
Canadian ATS demand splits four ways. Modern Toronto-Waterloo, Montreal and Vancouver SaaS scale-ups (Shopify, 1Password, Vidyard, Top Hat, Loopio, Coveo, Lightspeed, Hootsuite, Clio, Cohere, Wealthsimple) default to Greenhouse, with Ashby and Lever gaining share on new deployments. Big 5 banks, major insurers and large retailers (RBC, TD, Scotiabank, BMO, CIBC, Manulife, Sun Life, Loblaws, Sobeys, Canadian Tire) consolidate on Workday Recruiting inside Workday HCM. Canadian telcos and Crown corps (Telus, Bell, Rogers, Air Canada, Canada Post, CBC/Radio-Canada) hold iCIMS and SAP SuccessFactors. Staffing agencies run Bullhorn almost universally.
Bill 96 reshapes Quebec hiring. Job postings for Quebec-based roles must be in French of equivalent quality to any other language, internal communications with Quebec employees must accommodate French, and Quebec candidates have rights to French-language onboarding. SmartRecruiters and Workday Recruiting handle bilingual workflows strongly; Greenhouse, Lever and iCIMS handle bilingual postings well; Ashby and Workable are catching up. Quebec public sector (SQI, MSSS, Hydro-Quebec, MTQ) requires French-first deployment with English secondary.
PIPEDA governs candidate data outside Quebec; Loi 25 requires explicit consent, breach notification, a PIA for new technologies and a transfer impact assessment for cross-border movement of Quebec-resident candidate data. Ontario Bill 88 requires employers with 25+ employees to disclose electronic monitoring policies, which captures ATS workflow visibility. Provincial human rights codes (Ontario, Quebec, BC, Alberta) restrict pre-employment data collection; AI-based screening is increasingly scrutinised under OHRC and CHRC guidance. CCCS PROTECTED B applies to federal recruiting.
PIPEDA governs candidate personal information federally and in nine provinces. Quebec Law 25 requires explicit consent, breach notification, a PIA for new candidate tracking technologies, disclosure plus right-to-human-review when automated decisions significantly affect candidates, and a transfer impact assessment for cross-border data movement. Bill 96 requires French job postings of equivalent quality for Quebec-based roles and French candidate experience for Quebec applicants. Ontario Bill 88 requires employers with 25+ employees to disclose electronic monitoring policies. Provincial human rights codes (Ontario Human Rights Code, Quebec Charter, BC Human Rights Code, Alberta Human Rights Act) restrict pre-employment questions and protected-ground discrimination; Canadian Human Rights Commission applies federally. AI-based screening is increasingly scrutinised under OHRC and CHRC guidance. Provincial employment standards (Ontario ESA, Quebec Labour Standards Act, BC ESA, Alberta Employment Standards Code) and federal Canada Labour Code govern post-hire data flows. CCCS PROTECTED B baseline applies to federal recruiting through SSC. PHIPA (Ontario), HIA (Alberta) and HIPMA (Yukon) restrict health-related candidate data.
Quick comparison, ranked for Canada
| Product | Best for | Starts at | 10-emp/mo* | Pricing | G2 | Geo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Greenhouse | Tech-forward mid-market and lower enterprise | Quote | - | 4.4 | Global; strongest in US, EU, UK | |
| 4 Workday Recruiting | Enterprise on Workday HCM | Quote | - | 4.0 | Global; enterprise-grade | |
| 2 Ashby | Fast-growing tech companies | Quote | - | 4.7 | Global; strongest in US, growing EU and UK | |
| 3 Lever | Mid-sized tech companies | Quote | - | 4.3 | Global; strongest in US, EU, UK, Canada | |
| 6 SmartRecruiters | European and global enterprises | Quote | - | 4.3 | Global; strongest in EMEA, growing US | |
| 5 iCIMS | Enterprise non-tech | Quote | - | 4.1 | Global; strongest in US enterprise | |
| 8 Workable | SMBs hiring 5-50 roles/year | $99 | $99 | 4.4 | Global; strongest in US, EU, UK | |
| 7 Bullhorn | Staffing agencies and recruiting firms | Quote | - | 4.0 | Global; strongest in US, UK, AU | |
| 9 Recruitee | European SMBs | $199 | $199 | 4.5 | Global; strongest in EU, UK | |
| 10 JazzHR | Very small companies | $49 | $49 | 4.4 | Primarily US; growing international |
*10-employee monthly cost = base fee + (per-employee × 10) using the lowest published tier. For opaque-pricing vendors, no value is shown.
What buyers in Canada actually pay
Median annual deal size by employee band, in CAD. Crowdsourced from anonymized buyer disclosures.
| Product | Employee band | Median annual (CAD) | Sample | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Greenhouse | SaaS scale-up 100-500 employees | CA$38,000 | 22 | Greenhouse Welcome to Pro tier in CAD |
| Workday Recruiting | Big 5 bank or insurer Workday HCM customer | CA$285,000 | 9 | Workday Recruiting bundle inside Workday HCM |
| Ashby | Series B/C SaaS 50-200 employees | CA$22,000 | 14 | Ashby Growth |
| Lever | Mid-market 100-500 employees | CA$32,000 | 11 | Lever Take + Nurture |
| SmartRecruiters | Bilingual enterprise CGI, Bombardier | CA$165,000 | 7 | SmartRecruiters Recruit Enterprise + French Premium |
| Workable | SMB 20-100 employees | CA$7,800 | 19 | Workable Standard |
Canada-built or Canada-strong vendors worth knowing
Not yet ranked in our global top 10, but credible options for Canada buyers and worth a shortlist.
Humi
Visit ↗Toronto-built HR, payroll and benefits platform with built-in ATS focused on Canadian SMB. Native Canadian compliance (CRA T4, ROE, provincial employment standards), often the right answer below 100 employees instead of Greenhouse + Rippling.
Knit People
Visit ↗Toronto-built payroll + HR + ATS for Canadian SMB. Direct Canadian compliance posture, lighter than Humi for very small teams.
Talentcube / TalentNest (Canadian regional)
Visit ↗Several Canadian regional ATS focused on bilingual EN/FR and provincial labour compliance. Niche but real share at Quebec mid-market and Atlantic Canada.
All 10, ranked for Canada
Same intelligence as the global ranking, vendor trust, review patterns, verified pricing, compliance, reordered for the Canada market.
Greenhouse
Modern ATS market leader for modern mid-market.
Greenhouse is the modern ATS market leader for engineering-led mid-market companies (50-2,000 employees). The product's strengths: strongest structured interview workflow (interview kits, scorecards, kickoffs), deepest integration ecosystem (450+ integrations), and a strong content/education brand. Trade-offs: pricing has escalated post-TPG acquisition (2020), customer support quality has declined consistently, and pricing remains call-for-quote with reported costs of $7K-$50K+/year.
Tech-forward mid-market companies (50-2,000 employees) wanting structured interview workflow and broad integration ecosystem.
Workday HCM customers (Workday Recruiting better integration), staffing agencies (Bullhorn better fit), or budget-conscious SMBs (Workable/Recruitee cheaper).
Strengths
- Strongest structured interview workflow in category
- Deepest integration ecosystem (450+)
- Strong content/education brand (Greenhouse Open conference)
- Public Greenhouse Standard for structured hiring
- Works for tech-led mid-market (50-2,000 employees)
Weaknesses
- Pricing escalated post-TPG acquisition (2020)
- Customer support quality has declined consistently
- Call-for-quote pricing creates buyer friction
- Reporting depth thinner than Ashby
- AI features arrived late vs Ashby/Lever
Pricing tiers
opaque- EssentialStarts ~$7,000/year for small teamsQuote
- Advanced$12,000-$25,000/year typical mid-marketQuote
- Expert$25,000-$50,000+/year for advanced workflowsQuote
- · Implementation fee ($5K-$25K)
- · Annual price increases of 8-15%
- · Onboarding partner fees common
- · Premium add-ons (CRM, Recruit)
Key features
- +Structured interview kits and scorecards
- +Custom hiring plans per role
- +Career site CMS
- +Source tracking and analytics
- +Offer management
- +EEO/OFCCP reporting
- +450+ integrations
- +Greenhouse Recruit (CRM add-on)
Workday Recruiting
Default ATS for Workday HCM customers.
Workday Recruiting is Workday's ATS module, sold as part of the Workday HCM suite. The product's primary advantage is native integration with Workday HCM (covered separately in our Top 10 HRIS ranking), for Workday customers, the Workday Recruiting decision is essentially default. Trade-offs: outside Workday ecosystem the product is significantly weaker, UX is dated, implementation costs are enterprise-scale ($50K-$500K), and customer reports flag rigidity vs modern ATS UX.
Enterprise (5,000+ employees) already on Workday HCM where single-source-of-truth integration trumps recruiter UX.
Anyone not on Workday HCM (Greenhouse/iCIMS/Ashby better), modern mid-market (Greenhouse/Ashby better), or staffing agencies (Bullhorn better).
Strengths
- Native integration with Workday HCM
- Single source of truth for HR + recruiting data
- Enterprise compliance and security depth
- Right call for 5,000+ employee enterprises on Workday
- Established public company
Weaknesses
- Outside Workday ecosystem significantly weaker
- UX dated vs modern ATS
- Implementation costs enterprise-scale ($50K-$500K)
- Rigidity flagged in user reports
- Recruiter UX inferior to Greenhouse/Ashby
Pricing tiers
opaque- Workday RecruitingSold as part of Workday HCM suiteQuote
- · Implementation fees ($50K-$500K)
- · Bundled with Workday HCM
- · Annual price increases
Key features
- +Native Workday HCM integration
- +Career site CMS
- +Structured interview workflows
- +Source tracking
- +Offer management
- +EEO/OFCCP reporting
- +Enterprise compliance
Ashby
Modern all-in-one ATS + CRM + analytics with the best reporting.
Ashby is the fastest-growing modern ATS, founded 2018, raised $30M Series B in 2024. The product's strengths: best built-in analytics in category (no need for Tableau bolt-on), most opinionated all-in-one approach (ATS + CRM + analytics in one platform), and aggressive product velocity. Best fit for fast-growing tech companies (20-1,000 employees) wanting one platform instead of stitching tools. Trade-offs: smaller integration ecosystem than Greenhouse (~120 vs 450), per-seat pricing scales fast, and US-centric (weaker EU compliance depth than SmartRecruiters).
Fast-growing tech companies (20-1,000 employees) wanting modern UX, built-in analytics, and one platform instead of stitching ATS + CRM + analytics.
Enterprise non-tech (iCIMS better), Workday HCM customers (Workday Recruiting better fit), or staffing agencies (Bullhorn better fit).
Strengths
- Best built-in analytics in category
- All-in-one ATS + CRM + analytics in one platform
- Aggressive product velocity (weekly releases)
- Made for fast-growing tech companies
- Founder-led, Series B
- Modern UX
Weaknesses
- Smaller integration ecosystem (~120 vs Greenhouse 450)
- Per-seat pricing scales fast
- US-centric (weaker EU compliance than SmartRecruiters)
- Less customizable workflows than Greenhouse Expert
- Newer product; some growing pains
Pricing tiers
semi-public- ProStarts ~$400/seat/year typicalQuote
- Plus$600-$800/seat/year mid-marketQuote
- EnterpriseCustom quoteQuote
- · Per-seat scaling adds up fast
- · Implementation fee ($2K-$10K)
- · Annual billing commitment
Key features
- +Built-in analytics dashboard
- +ATS + CRM + analytics combined
- +Structured interview kits
- +Career site CMS
- +Sourcing extension
- +Offer management
- +120+ integrations
- +AI sourcing
Lever
Modern ATS UX, stagnated post-Employ acquisition.
Lever was the modern ATS challenger to Greenhouse from 2012-2022. Acquired by Employ Inc. (parent of Jobvite, JazzHR) in 2022. Post-acquisition product velocity has slowed and customer reports indicate stagnation. The product's strengths: still-modern UX, native CRM (Lever Nurture), and lower price point than Greenhouse. Trade-offs: post-Employ stagnation flagged consistently, customer support quality has declined, and many former Lever customers are migrating to Ashby or Greenhouse.
Mid-sized tech companies (100-500 employees) wanting modern ATS at lower cost than Greenhouse, willing to accept slower product velocity.
Fast-growing companies prioritizing innovation (Ashby better), enterprise (Greenhouse/iCIMS better), or staffing agencies (Bullhorn better).
Strengths
- Modern ATS UX (still credible)
- Native CRM (Lever Nurture)
- Lower price point than Greenhouse ($5K-$25K)
- Best for 100-500 employee tech companies
- Established brand with 1,500+ customers
Weaknesses
- Post-Employ acquisition stagnation
- Product velocity has slowed
- Customer support quality declined
- Migration churn to Ashby/Greenhouse
- Innovation lagging vs Ashby
Pricing tiers
opaque- LeverTRMStarts ~$5,000/year for small teamsQuote
- LeverTRM Pro$10K-$25K/year mid-marketQuote
- EnterpriseCustom quoteQuote
- · Implementation fee ($3K-$15K)
- · Annual price increases of 5-12%
- · Lever Nurture (CRM) bundled at higher tier
Key features
- +ATS + CRM combo (Lever Nurture)
- +Structured interview kits
- +Custom dashboards
- +Career site CMS
- +Source tracking
- +EEO/OFCCP reporting
- +300+ integrations
SmartRecruiters
European enterprise ATS leader.
SmartRecruiters is the European enterprise ATS leader with 4,000+ customers across EMEA. The product's strengths: strong multi-language support (40+ languages), deep EU compliance (GDPR-native), and integrated marketplace for sourcing. Best fit for European enterprises and global companies with EU operations. Trade-offs: less penetration in US enterprise vs iCIMS, Support inconsistency reported, and pricing call-for-quote with reported costs of $20K-$200K/year.
European enterprises and global companies with significant EU operations needing multi-language support and GDPR-native compliance.
US-only tech companies (Greenhouse/Ashby better), Workday HCM customers (Workday Recruiting better fit), or staffing agencies (Bullhorn better).
Strengths
- European market leader (4,000+ customers)
- Strong multi-language support (40+ languages)
- GDPR-native compliance
- Integrated sourcing marketplace
- Built for EMEA enterprises
Weaknesses
- Less penetration in US enterprise
- Support response times vary
- Call-for-quote pricing creates friction
- UX less modern than Ashby/Greenhouse
- Innovation pace slower than US peers
Pricing tiers
opaque- Smart$20K-$60K/year typical mid-marketQuote
- Smart Plus$60K-$200K/year enterpriseQuote
- EnterpriseCustom quoteQuote
- · Implementation fee ($15K-$100K)
- · Annual price increases of 6-10%
- · Marketplace add-ons
Key features
- +Multi-language support (40+)
- +GDPR-native compliance
- +Career site CMS
- +Sourcing marketplace
- +Structured interview workflows
- +Offer management
- +350+ integrations
iCIMS
Enterprise ATS leader for non-tech organizations.
iCIMS is the enterprise ATS leader for non-tech organizations (10,000+ employees). The product's strengths: strongest career site CMS in category, deep enterprise feature set (text-to-apply, candidate experience workflows), and used by 4,000+ enterprise brands. Best fit for retail, healthcare, manufacturing, and government enterprises. Trade-offs: UX is enterprise-dated, implementation is heavy ($25K-$500K), per-employee pricing scales fast, and customer reports flag declining responsiveness post-Vista (acquired 2018).
Enterprise non-tech organizations (10,000+ employees), retail, healthcare, manufacturing, government, needing deep career site CMS and high-volume hiring workflows.
Tech-forward companies (Greenhouse/Ashby better), Workday HCM customers (Workday Recruiting better fit), or mid-market (overpriced).
Strengths
- Strongest career site CMS in category
- Deep enterprise feature set
- 4,000+ enterprise customers
- Fits retail, healthcare, manufacturing, government
- Text-to-apply, candidate experience workflows
Weaknesses
- UX enterprise-dated vs Greenhouse/Ashby
- Heavy implementation ($25K-$500K)
- Per-employee pricing scales fast
- Declining responsiveness post-Vista (2018)
- Innovation lagging vs Ashby
Pricing tiers
opaque- Talent CloudStarts ~$1,200-$2,400/year per 100 employeesQuote
- Talent Cloud + ModulesModules: Onboard, CRM, Video StudioQuote
- · Implementation fee ($25K-$500K)
- · Per-module add-ons
- · Annual price increases of 8-12%
Key features
- +Career site CMS (industry-leading)
- +Text-to-apply
- +Candidate experience workflows
- +High-volume hiring
- +EEO/OFCCP reporting
- +Onboarding module
- +450+ integrations
Workable
SMB ATS at $99-$599/month with built-in job board posting.
Workable is the strongest SMB ATS at the $99-$599/month tier. The product's strengths: subscription pricing (no per-seat scaling), built-in job board posting (200+ boards), AI-powered sourcing, and a clean modern UX. Best fit for SMBs (10-200 employees) hiring 5-50 roles per year. Trade-offs: feature depth limited vs Greenhouse, Support depends on tier, and pricing has crept up over 2024-2025.
SMBs (10-200 employees) hiring 5-50 roles per year, wanting subscription pricing and built-in job board posting.
Tech-forward mid-market (Greenhouse/Ashby better), enterprise (iCIMS/Workday Recruiting better), or staffing agencies (Bullhorn better).
Strengths
- Subscription pricing (no per-seat scaling at low tiers)
- Built-in job board posting (200+ boards)
- AI-powered sourcing
- Clean modern UX
- Fits 10-200 employee SMBs
Weaknesses
- Feature depth limited vs Greenhouse
- Support inconsistency reported
- Pricing crept up over 2024-2025
- Reporting depth basic
- Per-job posting limits on lower tiers
Pricing tiers
public- Starter2 jobs, 1 user; basic ATS$99 /mo
- StandardUnlimited jobs, 5 users; AI sourcing$299 /mo
- PremierUnlimited jobs, advanced reporting, dedicated CSM$599 /mo
- · Annual billing for discount
- · Per-job posting limits on Starter
- · AI sourcing add-on costs
Key features
- +Built-in job board posting (200+)
- +AI-powered sourcing
- +Career site CMS
- +Structured interview workflows
- +Offer management
- +Mobile apps
- +70+ integrations
Bullhorn
CRM-first ATS for staffing agencies and recruiting firms.
Bullhorn dominates the staffing agency and recruiting firm market with its CRM-first design. The product's strengths: optimized for high-volume placement workflows, integrated CRM for tracking client + candidate relationships, and used by 10,000+ staffing firms globally. Best fit for staffing agencies, executive search firms, and RPOs. Trade-offs: poorly suited for in-house corporate hiring (Greenhouse/iCIMS better), UX dated, and pricing meaningful at agency scale.
Staffing agencies, recruiting firms, executive search, RPOs (5-500 recruiters) needing CRM-first ATS optimized for high-volume placement workflows.
Corporate in-house hiring (Greenhouse/iCIMS/Ashby better), tech-forward companies (Greenhouse/Ashby better), or budget-conscious solo recruiters (Workable/JazzHR cheaper).
Strengths
- CRM-first design optimized for staffing
- High-volume placement workflows
- 10,000+ staffing firms
- Integrated CRM for client + candidate relationships
- Best for agencies, executive search, RPOs
Weaknesses
- Poorly suited for corporate in-house hiring
- UX dated vs modern ATS
- Pricing meaningful at scale
- Uneven support quality
- Innovation pace slower than Ashby/Greenhouse
Pricing tiers
opaque- Bullhorn ATS/CRM~$99-$199/recruiter/monthQuote
- Bullhorn Enterprise$200+/recruiter/monthQuote
- · Implementation fee ($5K-$50K)
- · Per-recruiter scaling adds up
- · Annual price increases
Key features
- +CRM-first design
- +High-volume placement workflows
- +Client + candidate tracking
- +Email integration
- +Mobile apps
- +EEO/OFCCP reporting
- +300+ integrations
Recruitee
European-built SMB ATS with strong multi-language.
Recruitee is the European-built SMB ATS, founded 2015 in Amsterdam, acquired by Tellent (formerly Recruit Holdings) in 2022. The product's strengths: strong multi-language support, GDPR-native compliance, clean UX, and SMB-friendly pricing. Best fit for European SMBs (10-200 employees) wanting an EU-anchored alternative to US ATS. Trade-offs: less penetration in US, integration ecosystem narrower (~80), and post-Tellent acquisition some product velocity has slowed.
European SMBs (10-200 employees) wanting EU-anchored ATS with GDPR-native compliance and multi-language support.
US-only companies (Workable/Greenhouse better), enterprise (SmartRecruiters/iCIMS better), or staffing agencies (Bullhorn better).
Strengths
- Strong multi-language support (16+ languages)
- GDPR-native compliance
- Clean modern UX
- SMB-friendly subscription pricing
- Works for European SMBs
Weaknesses
- Less penetration in US
- Integration ecosystem narrower (~80)
- Post-Tellent acquisition product velocity slowed
- Reporting depth thinner than Greenhouse
- AI features less mature than Ashby
Pricing tiers
public- Start5 jobs, basic ATS$199 /mo
- GrowUnlimited jobs, advanced workflows$299 /mo
- OptimizeCustom quote; advanced reporting, SSOQuote
- · Annual billing for discount
- · Per-job limits on Start tier
Key features
- +Multi-language support (16+)
- +GDPR-native compliance
- +Career site CMS
- +Structured interview workflows
- +Offer management
- +80+ integrations
JazzHR
Cheapest credible SMB ATS at $49-$359/month.
JazzHR is the cheapest credible SMB ATS, owned by Employ Inc. (parent of Lever, Jobvite). The product's strengths: lowest pricing in category at $49-$359/month, simple subscription model, and strong fit for very small companies (1-50 employees). Trade-offs: feature depth limited vs Workable, post-Employ stagnation similar to Lever, and Support response times vary.
Very small companies (1-50 employees) hiring 2-20 roles per year, wanting the cheapest credible SMB ATS.
Tech-forward mid-market (Greenhouse/Ashby better), enterprise (iCIMS/Workday Recruiting better), or staffing agencies (Bullhorn better).
Strengths
- Lowest pricing in category ($49-$359/mo)
- Simple subscription model
- Built for 1-50 employee companies
- Subscription pricing (no per-seat)
- Built-in job board posting
Weaknesses
- Feature depth limited vs Workable
- Post-Employ stagnation
- Support is hit-or-miss
- AI features absent
- Reporting depth basic
Pricing tiers
public- Hero3 jobs, basic ATS$49 /mo
- PlusUnlimited jobs, custom workflows$229 /mo
- ProCustom reporting, e-signature$359 /mo
- · Annual billing for discount
- · Per-job limits on Hero
- · Add-ons for advanced features
Key features
- +Built-in job board posting
- +Career site CMS
- +Structured interview workflows
- +Offer management
- +E-signature (Pro)
- +50+ integrations
Frequently asked questions
The questions buyers actually ask before they sign.
Which ATS handles Bill 96 French job postings best?
How does Loi 25 affect AI-based candidate screening?
Why is Bullhorn the default for Canadian staffing agencies?
Greenhouse vs Ashby, which one for tech mid-market?
How does this differ from your HRIS ranking?
How much should I budget for ATS?
How long does ATS implementation take?
What about AI in ATS in 2026?
Can I evaluate ATS via free trial?
Will my ATS integrate with my HRIS?
How does this overlap with sales-engagement and recruiting CRM?
Final word
Looking at a different market? See the global Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS) ranking, or pick another country at the top of this page.
Last updated 2026-05-27. Local pricing reverified quarterly. Found something inaccurate? Tell us.