Engineering-led teams (5 to 500 engineers) wanting open-core, self-hostable workflow automation plus lightweight low-code UI, with strong data-residency or GDPR requirements, and the ops capacity to run self-hosted infrastructure.
Non-engineering teams (Zapier is the right primitive for SMB ops), enterprises requiring OSI-open-source procurement (the fair-code license is source-available but not OSI), or buyers wanting heavy app-building surface (Bubble or Retool are purpose-built).
Is n8n a trustworthy vendor?
- 2021-12-15Series A $12M led by Felicis VenturesSequoia and Highland Europe participated; established n8n as the credible open-core challenger in workflow automation.
- 2022-06-15Sustainable Use License adopted (fair-code, not OSI-open-source)License change distinguishes n8n from purely open-source competitors and from purely commercial SaaS; remains source-available with limited commercial-use restrictions.
- 2024-04-22AI nodes and LangChain integration GABrought AI workflow capability to n8n; positioned it alongside Zapier Central and Make AI nodes.
- 2025-09-22Self-hosted Enterprise tier formalized with RBAC and SSO
What 480 reviews actually say
Synthesized from G2, Capterra, Reddit, Trustpilot. Patterns >15% prevalence shown.
Praise patterns
- Self-hostable open-core architecture is the key differentiator87% ↑
- EU-headquartered with strong GDPR and data-residency posture71% →
- AI nodes and LangChain integration landing credibly64% ↑
- Engineering-led teams prefer over Zapier or Make51% ↑
Complaint patterns
- Smaller partner ecosystem than Zapier or Make47% →
- Fair-code license is not OSI-open-source; matters for some procurement41% →
- Self-hosting requires real infrastructure ops investment38% →
- App-building surface lighter than Bubble or Retool31% →
What buyers actually pay
142 anonymized deal disclosures · last updated 2026-05-01
| Company size | Median annual |
|---|---|
| 5-50 employees | $600 |
| 50-500 employees | $6,000 |
| 500+ employees | $36,000 |
Auto-verified certifications
Editorial: Strengths
- Open-core with self-hostable runtime (key differentiator)
- EU-headquartered with strong GDPR and data-residency posture
- 500+ integration nodes covering most enterprise needs
- Credible AI node and LangChain integration (2024)
- Engineering-led teams genuinely prefer for self-hosted scenarios
- Fair-code license permits source modification
- Active community and strong contributor base
- Pricing transparent and competitive
Editorial: Weaknesses
- Smaller partner ecosystem than Zapier or Make
- Fair-code license is not OSI-open-source; matters for some procurement
- Workflow-first; app-building surface lighter than Bubble or Retool
- Funding posture lighter than incumbents
- Self-hosting requires real infrastructure ops investment
- Enterprise governance and ALM story still maturing
Key features & integrations
- +Visual workflow automation (Cloud or self-hosted)
- +500+ integration nodes
- +AI nodes with LangChain integration (2024)
- +Self-hostable open-core architecture
- +Fair-code license
- +Webhook and API trigger support
- +Code node for custom logic
- +Emerging low-code app-building surface
Read our full ranking of Low-Code / No-Code Platforms
n8n ranks #10 in our editorial review of 10 low-code / no-code platforms platforms. The deep-dive covers methodology, comparison tables, decision matrix, migration scoring, and FAQs.
Read the full rankingClosest alternatives in Low-Code / No-Code Platforms
Contribute your verified deal price
Pricing in B2B software is opaque because vendors want it that way. Verified buyer prices fix that, anonymously. Share what you actually paid for n8n; we’ll add it to the verified pricing dataset on this page (with company size band only, no identifying details).
Submit anonymously