Mid-market organizations (200 to 5,000 employees) in construction, manufacturing, field services, and operations-heavy verticals where citizen-developer apps replace spreadsheets and Microsoft Access databases, and where ops-team familiarity with the existing Quickbase product matters more than AI feature velocity.
Microsoft-anchored shops (Power Apps wins on bundle economics), engineering teams (Retool is the right primitive), or buyers prioritizing AI feature velocity (Power Apps, Mendix, OutSystems all ahead).
Is Quickbase a trustworthy vendor?
- 2016-04-26Intuit divests Quickbase to Welsh CarsonFirst step out of Intuit; product established independent product roadmap.
- 2019-04-04Vista Equity Partners acquires Quickbase for ~$1BVista PE ownership predictably shifted financial posture; customers have flagged tightening pricing and renewal motion since.
- 2023-09-12Quickbase Pipelines feature expanded with native integration capabilities
- 2024-06-12Quickbase AI assistant launchedGenerative AI app authoring; positioned Quickbase on AI feature surface alongside Power Apps Copilot and OutSystems Mentor, though arrived later.
What 1,180 reviews actually say
Synthesized from G2, Capterra, Reddit, Trustpilot. Patterns >15% prevalence shown.
Praise patterns
- Long-running citizen-developer brand familiar to ops teams78% →
- Spreadsheet-and-table data model accessible to non-engineers71% →
- Strong fit for construction, manufacturing, field services64% →
- Pipelines feature solid for integration and automation51% →
Complaint patterns
- Pricing posture has tightened under Vista Equity ownership64% ↑
- AI feature surface lighter than Power Apps, Mendix, OutSystems47% ↑
- Product investment velocity questions persist post-acquisition41% ↑
- Per-user minimums frustrate smaller teams38% →
What buyers actually pay
248 anonymized deal disclosures · last updated 2026-05-01
| Company size | Median annual |
|---|---|
| 200-1,000 employees | $24,000 |
| 1,000-5,000 employees | $84,000 |
| 5,000+ employees | $240,000 |
Auto-verified certifications
Editorial: Strengths
- Long-running citizen-developer brand with deep mid-market install base
- Particularly strong in construction, manufacturing, field services
- Mature spreadsheet-and-table data model accessible to non-engineers
- Formula language familiar to spreadsheet users
- Quickbase AI assistant reasonable for app authoring (2024)
- Mobile companion app respectable
- Mature pipelines (integration / automation) feature
Editorial: Weaknesses
- Vista Equity ownership since 2019 has shifted pricing posture
- Product investment velocity questions persist post-acquisition
- AI feature surface lighter than Power Apps, Mendix, OutSystems
- Not credible in developer-grade or full-stack segments
- Pricing opaque relative to peers
- Brand momentum has softened in 2024-2026
Key features & integrations
- +Citizen-developer app builder
- +Spreadsheet-and-table data model
- +Formula language for non-engineers
- +Quickbase Pipelines (integration / automation)
- +Quickbase AI assistant (2024)
- +Mobile companion app
- +Multi-user governance
- +Construction and field-service vertical templates
Quickbase trust score
6-dimension scorecard, dated, separate from product quality.
Who shouldn’t buy Quickbase
Editorial verdict on the buyers it’s the wrong fit for.
Quickbase alternatives, ranked
9 independent picks from the same category.
Read our full ranking of Low-Code / No-Code Platforms
Quickbase ranks #7 in our editorial review of 10 low-code / no-code platforms platforms. The deep-dive covers methodology, comparison tables, decision matrix, migration scoring, and FAQs.
Read the full rankingClosest alternatives in Low-Code / No-Code Platforms
Contribute your verified deal price
Pricing in B2B software is opaque because vendors want it that way. Verified buyer prices fix that, anonymously. Share what you actually paid for Quickbase; we’ll add it to the verified pricing dataset on this page (with company size band only, no identifying details).
Submit anonymously