Whiteboarding Software #1 Miro Miro Whiteboarding Software public 20 to 100,000
Best for
Enterprise teams running facilitated remote workshops, consulting firms billing design-thinking engagements, and any team where workshop template breadth and facilitator-community resources are a concrete requirement. Particularly strong for distributed product, design, and innovation teams from 200 to 50,000+ employees.
Worst for
Small teams that find FigJam or Whimsical lighter and cheaper, M365-first buyers who can rely on Microsoft Whiteboard for basic needs, EU public-sector buyers with strict data-residency or geopolitical-origin requirements, or teams that only need lightweight ad-hoc canvases.
Vendor Trust Score
Is Miro a trustworthy vendor?
7.6/10
Mixed
Pricing transparency
Published rates; no hidden fees
7.5
Contract fairness
Reasonable terms; no auto-renew traps
6.5
Incident response
How they handle outages and breaches
8.0
Post-acquisition behavior
Customer treatment after M&A or PE
8.0
Executive stability
Leadership churn over 24 months
8.0
Roadmap honesty
Public commitments held
7.5
Trust signal log
- 2022-01-05Miro raised $400M Series C at $17.5B valuationLed by ICONIQ Growth; positions Miro as the enterprise-default visual collaboration platform with multi-year product runway.
- 2023-09-15Russian-founder geopolitical context flagged by regulated procurementFounders Andrey Khusid and Oleg Shardin originally Russian; company has publicly distanced from Russia operations since 2022, but some defense, public-sector, and financial-services buyers continue to flag origin in procurement.
- 2024-09-22Aggressive renewal pricing reported by enterprise buyersMultiple buyer reports of double-digit renewal increases through 2024-2025; pattern consistent with category-wide vendor pricing pressure post-2022 funding peak.
- 2025-03-12AI Assist expanded with clustering and template generationWorkshop-relevant AI features shipped; independent facilitator feedback positive on clustering, mixed on summary quality for domain-specific content.
Vendor Trust is scored independently of product quality. A great product from an unfair vendor still earns a low trust score.
Review Intelligence
What 5,800 reviews actually say
Synthesized from G2, Capterra, Reddit, Trustpilot. Patterns >15% prevalence shown.
Last synthesized
2026-04-29
Praise patterns
- Deepest template library in the category87% →
- Strongest facilitator-community gravity78% →
- Mature enterprise SSO, audit log, SOC 2 plus ISO 2700171% →
- AI Assist clustering useful at workshop scale64% ↑
Complaint patterns
- Aggressive renewal pricing reported by enterprise buyers51% ↑
- Canvas performance degrades on very large boards47% →
- Free-tier limitations push small teams to paid quickly41% →
- Russian-founder geopolitical context flagged by procurement38% →
Sentiment trend (6 months)
81/100 -1 pts
12
01
02
03
04
05
Patterns are extracted from review corpus and human-verified. We surface trends, not anecdotes.
Verified Pricing
What buyers actually pay
412 anonymized deal disclosures · last updated 2026-05-01
| Company size | Median annual |
|---|---|
| 20 to 100 users (Business) | $19,200 |
| 100 to 1,000 users (Business) | $168,000 |
| 1,000+ users (Enterprise) | $540,000 |
Verified pricing is crowdsourced from buyers under anonymity guarantees. Vendor-listed prices are validated against actual deals quarterly.
Compliance & Security
Auto-verified certifications
Verified 2026-05-01
SOC 2 Type II
ISO 27001
HIPAA
GDPR
CCPA
PCI DSS
◐ FedRAMP In-Process
Editorial: Strengths
- Deepest template library in the category (1,000+ community templates)
- Strongest facilitator-community gravity; the default at consulting firms
- Mature enterprise SSO, SCIM, audit log, SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001
- AI Assist for clustering, summarization, and template generation is useful
- Developer platform for embedded boards and custom apps
- Strong native integration with Zoom, Teams, Slack, Jira, Asana
- $400M Series C in 2022 at $17.5B valuation; multi-year runway
Editorial: Weaknesses
- Aggressive renewal pricing reported by enterprise buyers through 2024-2025
- Canvas performance degrades on very large boards (5,000+ objects)
- Free-tier limitations push small teams to paid quickly
- Russian-founder geopolitical context flagged by regulated procurement
- Steeper learning curve than FigJam or Whimsical for first-time facilitators
- AI Assist accuracy on domain-specific clustering can be uneven
- Enterprise SSO and audit log gated to the top tier
Key features & integrations
- +Infinite canvas with sticky notes, shapes, frames, connectors
- +1,000+ workshop and template library (community plus official)
- +AI Assist for clustering, summarization, and template generation
- +Real-time co-editing with cursor tracking and reactions
- +Voting, timer, and facilitator-mode tools for workshops
- +Jira, Asana, Linear, and Confluence two-way integrations
- +Zoom, Teams, and Webex meeting integration
- +Developer platform with SDK for embedded boards
- +SAML SSO, SCIM, and audit log at Enterprise
- +REST API and webhooks
150+ integrations
ZoomMicrosoft TeamsSlackJiraAsanaConfluenceNotionFigmaWebexLinearGoogle DriveDropbox
Geography supported
Global; strongest in US, EU, UK, Australia
Best fit
20 to 100,000 employees · Enterprise and mid-market teams running facilitated workshops at scale
Editorial deep-dive
Read our full ranking of Whiteboarding Software
Miro ranks #1 in our editorial review of 10 whiteboarding software platforms. The deep-dive covers methodology, comparison tables, decision matrix, migration scoring, and FAQs.
Read the full rankingClosest alternatives in Whiteboarding Software
Help the next buyer
Contribute your verified deal price
Pricing in B2B software is opaque because vendors want it that way. Verified buyer prices fix that, anonymously. Share what you actually paid for Miro; we’ll add it to the verified pricing dataset on this page (with company size band only, no identifying details).
Submit anonymously