IT-led organisations already standardised on Lucidchart for process and architecture diagrams, enterprises wanting wireframing plus diagramming plus whiteboarding under one Lucid Suite license, and teams from 100 to 10,000 employees who value Microsoft 365 and Atlassian integration depth.
Design-led product teams already on Figma (Figma cleaner for wireframing), product managers wanting intentional low-fi (Balsamiq cleaner), UX teams needing high-fidelity prototypes (Axure RP), or buyers with no existing Lucid footprint (Figma or Whimsical cleaner).
Is Lucidchart a trustworthy vendor?
- 2021-04-13Lucid Software raised $500M Series D at $3B valuationLed by D1 Capital; positioned Lucid Suite as the diagramming-led integrated visual platform with multi-year runway.
- 2025-09-22Public-listing pending; pricing may shift post-IPOLucid Software has publicly signalled IPO readiness; enterprise buyers should expect renewal pressure post-listing.
What 2,200 reviews actually say
Synthesized from G2, Capterra, Reddit, Trustpilot. Patterns >15% prevalence shown.
Praise patterns
- Tight integration with Lucidspark under Lucid Suite78% →
- Mature enterprise SSO and SOC 2 Type II72% →
- Microsoft 365 and Atlassian integration depth65% →
- Transparent per-user pricing58% →
Complaint patterns
- Wireframing shape library lacks Figma or Balsamiq depth48% →
- No high-fidelity interactive prototype mode41% →
- Public-listing-pending overhang on pricing32% ↑
- Brand primarily associated with diagramming28% →
What buyers actually pay
188 anonymized deal disclosures · last updated 2026-05-15
| Company size | Median annual |
|---|---|
| 50 to 200 users (Team) | $7,200 |
| 200 to 1,000 users (Enterprise) | $96,000 |
| 1,000+ users (Enterprise + Suite) | $360,000 |
Auto-verified certifications
Editorial: Strengths
- Tight integration with Lucidspark whiteboarding under Lucid Suite
- Mature enterprise SSO, SCIM, SOC 2 Type II compliance
- Transparent per-user pricing with clear tier boundaries
- Wireframing shape library covers common web and mobile patterns
- Strong native integrations with Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, Atlassian
- Well-resourced engineering team from the underlying diagramming business
- Real-time co-editing with cursor tracking and conflict-free updates
Editorial: Weaknesses
- Not a dedicated wireframing tool; shape library lacks Figma or Balsamiq depth
- No high-fidelity interactive prototype mode (Axure RP territory)
- Public-listing-pending overhang may shift pricing post-IPO
- Brand primarily associated with diagramming, not wireframing
- Wireframe-specific community templates thinner than dedicated tools
Key features & integrations
- +Wireframing shape library (web, mobile, desktop UI patterns)
- +Diagramming surfaces (flowcharts, org charts, network, ERD)
- +Real-time co-editing with cursor tracking
- +Lucid Suite pairing with Lucidspark whiteboarding
- +Templates for wireframes, diagrams, and processes
- +Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace deep integration
- +Atlassian (Jira, Confluence) two-way integration
- +Salesforce object mapping and ERD generation
- +SAML SSO, SCIM, audit log at Enterprise
- +REST API and webhooks
Lucidchart trust score
6-dimension scorecard, dated, separate from product quality.
Who shouldn’t buy Lucidchart
Editorial verdict on the buyers it’s the wrong fit for.
Lucidchart alternatives, ranked
9 independent picks from the same category.
Read our full ranking of Wireframing Software
Lucidchart ranks #4 in our editorial review of 10 wireframing software platforms. The deep-dive covers methodology, comparison tables, decision matrix, migration scoring, and FAQs.
Read the full rankingClosest alternatives in Wireframing Software
Contribute your verified deal price
Pricing in B2B software is opaque because vendors want it that way. Verified buyer prices fix that, anonymously. Share what you actually paid for Lucidchart; we’ll add it to the verified pricing dataset on this page (with company size band only, no identifying details).
Submit anonymously