Skip to content
Z Zendikt
H
Status Page Software · Rank #4 of 10

Hund review and pricing

Quiet-quality status page for engineering teams that read the docs.

By Hund · Founded 2015 · Indianapolis, IN · private

Hund is the quietly-better status page that engineering teams find when they look past the brand names. Founded 2015, US-headquartered in Indianapolis, the product is the depth-first alternative: a genuinely thoughtful component model (groups, regions, sub-components with nested dependencies), granular incident state machine (investigating, identified, monitoring, resolved, plus custom states), strong webhook and API support, and a clean dashboard that does not try to be a marketing site. Trade-offs: brand recognition is low (the team has not invested in growth marketing, preferring product depth), integration ecosystem is smaller, and pricing is fair but not the cheapest in category. Best fit for technical buyers who care about the component model and the API surface more than the brand on the page.

Visit Hund Vendor pricing Compare to Statuspal
Best for

Technical teams (engineering-led status page ownership) who value depth in the component model and API surface over brand recognition, especially mid-market shops with complex service dependencies.

Worst for

Marketing or success-team-owned status pages where brand matters more than depth, very-small SMB teams (overkill), or buyers wanting bundled monitoring/on-call (Better Stack better).

Vendor Trust Score

Is Hund a trustworthy vendor?

9.0/10
High trust
Pricing transparency
Published rates; no hidden fees
9.0
Contract fairness
Reasonable terms; no auto-renew traps
9.0
Incident response
How they handle outages and breaches
9.0
Post-acquisition behavior
Customer treatment after M&A or PE
9.0
Executive stability
Leadership churn over 24 months
9.0
Roadmap honesty
Public commitments held
9.0
Trust signal log
  • 2020-08-15
    Component groups and nested dependencies launched
  • 2023-04-22
    SOC 2 Type 2 verified; enterprise readiness milestone
  • 2025-07-18
    Customizable incident state machine launched
Vendor Trust is scored independently of product quality. A great product from an unfair vendor still earns a low trust score.
Review Intelligence

What 95 reviews actually say

Synthesized from G2, Capterra, Reddit, Trustpilot. Patterns >15% prevalence shown.

Last synthesized
2026-04-29

Praise patterns

  • Deepest component model and dependency graph in category
    87% →
  • Strong public REST API and webhook surface
    78% →
  • Customizable incident state machine genuinely useful
    71% ↑
  • Fair pricing without tier-stacking traps
    64% →
  • Honest founder-led product velocity
    51% →

Complaint patterns

  • Brand recognition with procurement teams is low
    47% →
  • UX functional but less polished than Instatus/Better Stack
    41% →
  • Smaller integration ecosystem (~40)
    38% →
  • No bundled monitoring/on-call (point product)
    31% →
Sentiment trend (6 months)
88/100 +3 pts
12
01
02
03
04
05
Patterns are extracted from review corpus and human-verified. We surface trends, not anecdotes.
Verified Pricing

What buyers actually pay

48 anonymized deal disclosures · last updated 2026-04-30

Contribute your deal price
Company size Median annual
SMB (under 100 employees) $600
Mid-market (100-1,000) $3,600
Verified pricing is crowdsourced from buyers under anonymity guarantees. Vendor-listed prices are validated against actual deals quarterly.
Compliance & Security

Auto-verified certifications

Verified 2026-04-15
SOC 2 Type II
ISO 27001
HIPAA
GDPR
CCPA
PCI DSS
FedRAMP

Editorial: Strengths

  • Deepest component model in category (groups, regions, sub-components with nested dependencies)
  • Granular and customizable incident state machine
  • Strong webhook and public REST API
  • Clean dashboard; no marketing-site bloat
  • Fair pricing without subscriber-tier traps
  • US-headquartered; SOC 2 Type 2 verified
  • Founder-led with consistent product velocity

Editorial: Weaknesses

  • Brand recognition low; the team does not invest in growth marketing
  • Smaller integration ecosystem (~40)
  • Pricing fair but not the cheapest in category
  • No bundled monitoring or on-call (point product)
  • UX is functional but less polished than Instatus or Better Stack

Key features & integrations

  • +Deep component model with nested dependencies
  • +Customizable incident state machine
  • +Public and private (audience-specific) pages
  • +Subscriber notifications (email, SMS, webhook, Slack)
  • +Metrics displays
  • +Scheduled maintenance
  • +Custom domain and branding
  • +Strong public REST API and webhooks
  • +Scoped API tokens
40+ integrations
SlackMicrosoft TeamsWebhookPagerDutyOpsgenieDatadogNew RelicStatusGatorPingdom
Geography supported
Global; US-headquartered
Best fit
20-2,000 employees · Engineering-led status page ownership; mid-market with complex dependencies
Editorial deep-dive

Read our full ranking of Status Page Software

Hund ranks #4 in our editorial review of 10 status page software platforms. The deep-dive covers methodology, comparison tables, decision matrix, migration scoring, and FAQs.

Read the full ranking

Closest alternatives in Status Page Software

#3
Statuspal
Australian-headquartered cost-effective alternative with strong subscriber management.
★ 4.7 public
#5
Cachet
Open-source self-hosted status page; the no-SaaS option.
★ 4.4 public
#2
Better Stack (Status Pages)
Modern bundle of uptime monitoring, on-call, and status pages at fair pricing.
★ 4.8 public
Help the next buyer

Contribute your verified deal price

Pricing in B2B software is opaque because vendors want it that way. Verified buyer prices fix that, anonymously. Share what you actually paid for Hund; we’ll add it to the verified pricing dataset on this page (with company size band only, no identifying details).

Submit anonymously