Skip to content
Z Zendikt
e
CMMS Software · Rank #5 of 10

eMaint review and pricing

Fluke/Fortive CMMS; tight integration with Fluke condition-monitoring tools.

By Fluke Reliability (Fortive Corporation) · Founded 1986 · Marlton, NJ · public

eMaint is one of the longest-running CMMS platforms in the category, founded 1986 in Marlton, NJ. Acquired by Fluke (a Fortive subsidiary) in 2016, positioning eMaint inside the broader Fluke Reliability portfolio alongside Fluke vibration analyzers, thermal imagers, and condition-monitoring sensors. Strengths: native integration with Fluke instruments for condition-based maintenance, deep customization for reliability-engineering programs, mature implementation methodology with strong references in food and beverage, pharma, and discrete manufacturing. Best fit for reliability-engineering-led mid-market and enterprise manufacturing. Trade-offs: UX dated relative to Limble and MaintainX (the platform has been incrementally modernized but core flows show their 1986 lineage), per-user pricing tiers add up at scale, and customization that's a strength for reliability programs is a deployment-cost liability for buyers wanting out-of-box speed.

Best for

Reliability-engineering-led mid-market and enterprise manufacturing (500-10,000 assets) with active CMRP/CMRT programs, particularly food and beverage, pharma, and process manufacturing already using Fluke condition-monitoring tools.

Worst for

SMB maintenance teams wanting fast deployment (Limble cheaper and faster), facilities-only operations without reliability focus (Brightly better fit), or buyers needing modern mobile-first UX.

Verified Pricing

What buyers actually pay

No verified data yet

Contribute your deal price

No verified pricing data yet for eMaint.

Be the first to contribute →
Verified pricing is crowdsourced from buyers under anonymity guarantees. Vendor-listed prices are validated against actual deals quarterly.

Editorial: Strengths

  • Native integration with Fluke vibration analyzers and thermal cameras
  • Deep customization for reliability engineering and CMRP programs
  • Mature implementation methodology with food and beverage references
  • Fluke/Fortive financial backing and stability
  • Strong reporting depth for MTBF, MTTR, and reliability metrics
  • On-prem and SaaS deployment options (rare in modern CMMS)
  • 40 years of asset-intensive deployment experience

Editorial: Weaknesses

  • UX dated relative to Limble and MaintainX
  • Per-user pricing tiers add up meaningfully at scale
  • Customization-driven approach increases deployment cost vs out-of-box CMMS
  • Mobile experience trails CMMS-first vendors
  • Outside Fluke ecosystem differentiation thinner

Key features & integrations

  • +Work order and preventive maintenance management
  • +Asset hierarchy with parent-child and location relationships
  • +Condition-based maintenance via Fluke sensor integration
  • +MTBF, MTTR, and reliability reporting
  • +Parts inventory and MRO purchasing
  • +Mobile technician app (iOS, Android)
  • +Custom workflows and forms
  • +Audit log and compliance reporting
100+ integrations
Fluke ConnectSAPOracle ERPMicrosoft DynamicsQuickBooksPower BI
Geography supported
Global; strongest in US, EU, UK, AU
Best fit
50–10,000 employees · Reliability-engineering-led manufacturing
Vendor trust

eMaint trust score

6-dimension scorecard, dated, separate from product quality.

Worst for

Who shouldn’t buy eMaint

Editorial verdict on the buyers it’s the wrong fit for.

Alternatives

eMaint alternatives, ranked

9 independent picks from the same category.

Editorial deep-dive

Read our full ranking of CMMS Software

eMaint ranks #5 in our editorial review of 10 cmms software platforms. The deep-dive covers methodology, comparison tables, decision matrix, migration scoring, and FAQs.

Read the full ranking

Closest alternatives in CMMS Software

Help the next buyer

Contribute your verified deal price

Pricing in B2B software is opaque because vendors want it that way. Verified buyer prices fix that, anonymously. Share what you actually paid for eMaint; we’ll add it to the verified pricing dataset on this page (with company size band only, no identifying details).

Submit anonymously