Organizations where privileged access is the anchor security control and CASB is a complementary pillar; existing CyberArk PAM customers extending into cloud-app access.
Pure CASB buyers without PAM use case (Netskope or Microsoft better), buyers wanting traditional CASB feature depth, or organizations on a tight CASB-only budget.
Is CyberArk Cloud Access Security a trustworthy vendor?
- 2014-09CyberArk IPO on NASDAQ (CYBR); financial transparency established
- 2017-05Acquired Conjur for secrets management; identity-secrets approach to cloud access strengthened
- 2023-05Acquired Venafi for $1.54B; machine-identity expansion (signal for cloud-workload identity)
- 2025-08CyberArk Identity Security Platform consolidation matured; full-stack PAM + Cloud Access + Workforce Identity story strong
What 380 reviews actually say
Synthesized from G2, Capterra, Reddit, Trustpilot. Patterns >15% prevalence shown.
Praise patterns
- PAM heritage strongest in market87% →
- Identity-secrets approach via Conjur integrates with cloud workloads71% →
- CyberArk SecureWeb browser-isolation strong for privileged access51% →
Complaint patterns
- CASB feature set narrower than Netskope on traditional use cases47% →
- Per-module SKU complexity creates surprise costs41% ↑
- Implementation services heavy for full stack38% →
- Standalone CASB procurement rare; bundled value31% →
What buyers actually pay
124 anonymized deal disclosures · last updated 2026-05-01
| Company size | Median annual |
|---|---|
| 500-2,500 employees | $90,000 |
| 2,500-10,000 employees | $360,000 |
| 10,000+ employees | $1,140,000 |
Auto-verified certifications
Editorial: Strengths
- PAM heritage strongest in market (CyberArk is the PAM leader)
- Identity-secrets approach (Conjur) integrates with cloud workloads
- CyberArk SecureWeb provides browser-isolation for privileged access
- Public company financial transparency (NASDAQ:CYBR; ~$960M revenue FY24)
- Strong compliance posture (FedRAMP authorized)
Editorial: Weaknesses
- CASB feature set narrower than Netskope and Microsoft on traditional use cases
- Most valuable when paired with broader CyberArk identity platform
- Standalone CASB procurement is rare
- Per-module SKU complexity inside Identity Security Platform creates surprise costs
- Brand recognition stronger in PAM than CASB
- Implementation services heavy for full identity-security stack
Key features & integrations
- +Cloud-app access control via PAM heritage
- +Conjur secrets management for cloud workloads
- +CyberArk SecureWeb browser-isolation
- +Identity-secrets integration
- +Compliance reporting
- +Integration with CyberArk PAM
- +Just-in-time access for cloud apps
- +Audit logging across cloud-app sessions
Read our full ranking of Cloud Access Security Broker (CASB) Software
CyberArk Cloud Access Security ranks #9 in our editorial review of 10 cloud access security broker (casb) software platforms. The deep-dive covers methodology, comparison tables, decision matrix, migration scoring, and FAQs.
Read the full rankingClosest alternatives in Cloud Access Security Broker (CASB) Software
Contribute your verified deal price
Pricing in B2B software is opaque because vendors want it that way. Verified buyer prices fix that, anonymously. Share what you actually paid for CyberArk Cloud Access Security; we’ll add it to the verified pricing dataset on this page (with company size band only, no identifying details).
Submit anonymously