Forcepoint buyers preferring agentless reverse-proxy CASB for BYOD or unmanaged-device fleets, or existing Bitglass customers who migrated to Forcepoint ONE.
Microsoft 365-anchored shops with modern auth requirements (compatibility friction), buyers wanting transparent published pricing, or organizations sensitive to PE-ownership turbulence.
Is Forcepoint ONE (Bitglass) a trustworthy vendor?
- 2021-10Forcepoint acquired Bitglass; CASB technology folded into Forcepoint portfolio
- 2022-04Forcepoint ONE platform announced; Bitglass technology became the core SSE engine
- 2023-06Forcepoint ONE consolidation mostly complete; Bitglass customers migrated
- 2025-03Customer-support quality inconsistency persists post-Francisco Partners ownership
What 210 reviews actually say
Synthesized from G2, Capterra, Reddit, Trustpilot. Patterns >15% prevalence shown.
Praise patterns
- Agentless reverse-proxy CASB strong for BYOD78% →
- Forcepoint ONE unified SSE platform71% →
- FedRAMP authorization clears federal procurement51% →
Complaint patterns
- Reverse-proxy compatibility issues with M365 modern auth and Google OAuth47% →
- Dual-SKU situation with legacy Forcepoint CASB confuses buyers41% ↑
- Post-Francisco Partners cautious investment38% →
- Customer-support quality inconsistent31% →
What buyers actually pay
87 anonymized deal disclosures · last updated 2026-05-01
| Company size | Median annual |
|---|---|
| 500-2,500 employees | $72,000 |
| 2,500-10,000 employees | $252,000 |
| 10,000+ employees | $720,000 |
Auto-verified certifications
Editorial: Strengths
- Agentless reverse-proxy CASB (Bitglass heritage); strong for BYOD and unmanaged devices
- Forcepoint ONE unified SSE platform (CASB + SWG + ZTNA)
- FedRAMP authorization (federal procurement gate cleared)
- Cleaner SaaS UX than legacy Forcepoint CASB SKU
- Existing Bitglass customers retain technology investment
Editorial: Weaknesses
- Reverse-proxy compatibility issues with some SaaS (Microsoft 365 modern auth, Google OAuth)
- Dual-SKU situation with legacy Forcepoint CASB confuses buyers
- Post-Francisco Partners cautious investment continues
- Customer-support quality reported as inconsistent
- Pricing opaque and channel-driven
- Net-new sales win rate against Netskope and Microsoft mixed
Key features & integrations
- +Agentless reverse-proxy CASB (Bitglass heritage)
- +API-based CASB for sanctioned SaaS
- +Cloud-app discovery
- +DLP across cloud and web
- +Forcepoint ONE unified SSE management
- +ZTNA module on same platform
- +SWG module on same platform
- +Compliance reporting (HIPAA, PCI, GDPR)
Read our full ranking of Cloud Access Security Broker (CASB) Software
Forcepoint ONE (Bitglass) ranks #7 in our editorial review of 10 cloud access security broker (casb) software platforms. The deep-dive covers methodology, comparison tables, decision matrix, migration scoring, and FAQs.
Read the full rankingClosest alternatives in Cloud Access Security Broker (CASB) Software
Contribute your verified deal price
Pricing in B2B software is opaque because vendors want it that way. Verified buyer prices fix that, anonymously. Share what you actually paid for Forcepoint ONE (Bitglass); we’ll add it to the verified pricing dataset on this page (with company size band only, no identifying details).
Submit anonymously