Skip to content
Z Zendikt
C

Codeberg review and pricing

Non-profit EU-headquartered Git hosting for ethical-tech and OSS.

By Codeberg e.V. · Founded 2019 · Berlin, Germany · private

Codeberg is the non-profit, EU-headquartered Git hosting platform run by Codeberg e.V. a registered German association (eingetragener Verein). The platform is Forgejo-based (powered by the Forgejo hard fork of Gitea), free for OSS, and explicitly positioned as the ethical-tech alternative to GitHub for buyers prioritizing non-profit governance, EU data residency, and FOSS values. Codeberg is funded by donations and member dues, not VC capital, and explicitly rejects business models that train on user code or sell user data. Best fit for OSS projects, EU sovereignty buyers, ethical-tech organizations, and individual developers rejecting Microsoft-owned GitHub. Trade-offs: smaller community and integration ecosystem than GitHub, no AI features (intentional), no managed enterprise tier, and resources are donation-bounded.

Best for

OSS projects, EU sovereignty buyers, ethical-tech organizations, FOSS-anchored developers, and individuals rejecting Microsoft GitHub on governance grounds.

Worst for

Enterprise organizations requiring SLA-backed managed service (GitHub Enterprise or GitLab better), AI-anchored teams (Codeberg is intentionally AI-free), or buyers needing deep integration ecosystem.

Vendor Trust Score

Is Codeberg a trustworthy vendor?

8.9/10
High trust
Pricing transparency
Published rates; no hidden fees
9.5
Contract fairness
Reasonable terms; no auto-renew traps
9.5
Incident response
How they handle outages and breaches
7.5
Post-acquisition behavior
Customer treatment after M&A or PE
9.5
Executive stability
Leadership churn over 24 months
8.5
Roadmap honesty
Public commitments held
9.0
Trust signal log
  • 2019-01-15
    Codeberg e.V. founded as non-profit German association
    Berlin-based non-profit registered as eingetragener Verein; explicitly positioned as ethical-tech alternative to GitHub.
  • 2022-12-15
    Migrated to Forgejo after Gitea corporate-fork controversy
    Codeberg co-founded Forgejo and migrated infrastructure to the community-governed hard fork.
  • 2024-05-22
    EU sovereignty positioning resonated with regulated buyers
    Growth in EU public-sector and ethical-tech adoption through 2024-2025.
Vendor Trust is scored independently of product quality. A great product from an unfair vendor still earns a low trust score.
Review Intelligence

What 180 reviews actually say

Synthesized from G2, Capterra, Reddit, Trustpilot. Patterns >15% prevalence shown.

Last synthesized
2026-04-29

Praise patterns

  • Non-profit governance (Codeberg e.V.)
    87%
  • Native EU data residency
    78%
  • No pattern extraction, no training on user code
    71%
  • Forgejo-based community governance
    64%

Complaint patterns

  • Smaller community than GitHub
    47%
  • No AI features (intentional)
    41%
  • No SLA guarantees (donation-funded)
    38%
  • Smaller integration ecosystem
    31%
Sentiment trend (6 months)
87/100 +1 pts
12
01
02
03
04
05
Patterns are extracted from review corpus and human-verified. We surface trends, not anecdotes.
Verified Pricing

What buyers actually pay

47 anonymized deal disclosures · last updated 2026-05-01

Contribute your deal price
Company size Median annual
Individual / OSS $0
Sustaining Member $60
Verified pricing is crowdsourced from buyers under anonymity guarantees. Vendor-listed prices are validated against actual deals quarterly.
Compliance & Security

Auto-verified certifications

Verified 2026-05-01
SOC 2 Type II
ISO 27001
HIPAA
GDPR
CCPA
PCI DSS
FedRAMP

Editorial: Strengths

  • Non-profit governance (Codeberg e.V. German registered association)
  • Native EU data residency (Berlin-headquartered)
  • Forgejo-based (community-governed hard fork of Gitea)
  • Free for OSS projects
  • Explicit no-training-on-code, no-AI-extraction policy
  • Funded by donations and member dues (not VC capital)
  • Strong fit for ethical-tech, OSS, and EU sovereignty buyers

Editorial: Weaknesses

  • Smaller community and integration ecosystem than GitHub
  • No AI features (intentional; not a fit for AI-anchored teams)
  • No managed enterprise tier (donation-bounded resources)
  • Smaller marketplace and third-party integrations
  • Limited support (community-only)
  • No SLA guarantees (donation-funded infrastructure)

Key features & integrations

  • +Git hosting (Forgejo-based)
  • +Pull requests with code review
  • +Issues, milestones, project boards
  • +Wiki and project pages
  • +Codeberg CI (Woodpecker CI-based)
  • +Codeberg Pages (static site hosting)
  • +Mirror from GitHub, GitLab, etc.
  • +No tracking, no pattern extraction, no training on user code
  • +EU data residency (Berlin)
  • +Non-profit governance via Codeberg e.V.
30+ integrations
Woodpecker CIDrone CIForgejo ActionsMatrixXMPP
Geography supported
Global; EU data residency (Berlin, Germany)
Best fit
1 to 500 employees · OSS projects, ethical-tech orgs, EU sovereignty buyers
Editorial deep-dive

Read our full ranking of Code Repository / Version Control

Codeberg ranks #8 in our editorial review of 10 code repository / version control platforms. The deep-dive covers methodology, comparison tables, decision matrix, migration scoring, and FAQs.

Read the full ranking

Closest alternatives in Code Repository / Version Control

Help the next buyer

Contribute your verified deal price

Pricing in B2B software is opaque because vendors want it that way. Verified buyer prices fix that, anonymously. Share what you actually paid for Codeberg; we’ll add it to the verified pricing dataset on this page (with company size band only, no identifying details).

Submit anonymously