Skip to content
Z Zendikt
A
Code Repository / Version Control · Rank #6 of 10

AWS CodeCommit review and pricing

AWS Git hosting in active wind-down; closed to new customers July 2024.

By Amazon Web Services, Inc. · Founded 2015 · Seattle, WA · public

AWS CodeCommit is the AWS-managed Git hosting service, launched 2015 as part of AWS Developer Tools (alongside CodeBuild, CodeDeploy, CodePipeline). On July 25, 2024, AWS deprecated new-customer onboarding for CodeCommit, a major industry signal that the service is in active wind-down. Existing customers can continue using the service indefinitely (no announced shutdown date), but new buyers are explicitly steered away. The product is included here for completeness and because existing CodeCommit customers face real migration decisions. Best fit going forward: no greenfield buyers. Existing customers should plan migration to GitHub Enterprise, GitLab, or self-hosted Gitea over a 12 to 24 month window.

Visit AWS CodeCommit Vendor pricing Compare to Azure DevOps Repos
Best for

Existing CodeCommit customers with active workloads who need a defined migration path. No greenfield use case in 2026.

Worst for

Any new-customer scenario. AWS itself explicitly steers new buyers away. Greenfield AWS-anchored teams should choose GitHub Enterprise (Microsoft) or GitLab with AWS integration.

Vendor Trust Score

Is AWS CodeCommit a trustworthy vendor?

7.6/10
Mixed
Pricing transparency
Published rates; no hidden fees
8.0
Contract fairness
Reasonable terms; no auto-renew traps
7.5
Incident response
How they handle outages and breaches
8.0
Post-acquisition behavior
Customer treatment after M&A or PE
7.0
Executive stability
Leadership churn over 24 months
9.0
Roadmap honesty
Public commitments held
6.0
Trust signal log
  • 2024-07-25
    AWS deprecated CodeCommit new-customer onboarding
    Major industry signal; AWS announced new-customer onboarding closed effective July 25, 2024. Existing customers can continue, but the service is in active wind-down.
  • 2024-07-25
    AWS Developer Tools broader deprioritization
    CodeBuild, CodeDeploy, CodePipeline also showing reduced investment; AWS shifting focus to Q Developer and CDK.
Vendor Trust is scored independently of product quality. A great product from an unfair vendor still earns a low trust score.
Review Intelligence

What 280 reviews actually say

Synthesized from G2, Capterra, Reddit, Trustpilot. Patterns >15% prevalence shown.

Last synthesized
2026-04-29

Praise patterns

  • Native AWS IAM and KMS integration
    71% ↓
  • AWS region-pinned data residency
    51% ↓
  • Low cost for existing AWS-anchored teams
    47% ↓

Complaint patterns

  • AWS deprecated new-customer onboarding July 2024
    87% →
  • No AI integration (no Copilot, no Q Developer native)
    71% ↑
  • UI and feature set frozen
    64% ↑
  • Migration burden for existing customers
    51% ↑
  • No PR review polish of GitHub or GitLab
    41% →
Sentiment trend (6 months)
51/100 0 pts
12
01
02
03
04
05
Patterns are extracted from review corpus and human-verified. We surface trends, not anecdotes.
Verified Pricing

What buyers actually pay

87 anonymized deal disclosures · last updated 2026-05-01

Contribute your deal price
Company size Median annual
Existing customer (small) $0
Existing customer (mid) $120
Verified pricing is crowdsourced from buyers under anonymity guarantees. Vendor-listed prices are validated against actual deals quarterly.
Compliance & Security

Auto-verified certifications

Verified 2026-05-01
SOC 2 Type II
ISO 27001
HIPAA
GDPR
CCPA
PCI DSS
FedRAMP Authorized

Editorial: Strengths

  • Native AWS IAM, KMS, CloudTrail integration for existing customers
  • No per-seat fee for first 5 users; usage-based pricing beyond
  • AWS region-pinned data residency
  • Integrates with CodeBuild, CodeDeploy, CodePipeline (also being deprioritized)
  • Existing customers can continue using indefinitely (no announced shutdown)

Editorial: Weaknesses

  • AWS deprecated new-customer onboarding July 25, 2024 (closed to new buyers)
  • No active product investment; UI and feature set frozen
  • No AI coding integration (no Copilot, no Q Developer-native repo)
  • No PR review polish or branch protection sophistication of GitHub or GitLab
  • Migration burden for existing customers (12 to 24 month plan recommended)
  • AWS Developer Tools broader (CodeBuild, CodeDeploy, CodePipeline) also being deprioritized

Key features & integrations

  • +Git hosting in AWS regions
  • +IAM-based access control
  • +KMS encryption at rest
  • +CloudTrail audit logging
  • +Pull requests with approval rules (basic)
  • +CodeBuild, CodeDeploy, CodePipeline integration
  • +Triggers via Lambda or SNS
  • +No AI features (no Copilot, no native Q Developer repo)
30+ integrations
AWS IAMCodeBuildCodeDeployCodePipelineLambdaSNSCloudTrail
Geography supported
AWS regions (US, EU, AU, AP, CA)
Best fit
Existing customers only employees · No greenfield use case; existing AWS-anchored customers
Editorial deep-dive

Read our full ranking of Code Repository / Version Control

AWS CodeCommit ranks #6 in our editorial review of 10 code repository / version control platforms. The deep-dive covers methodology, comparison tables, decision matrix, migration scoring, and FAQs.

Read the full ranking

Closest alternatives in Code Repository / Version Control

#5
Azure DevOps Repos
Microsoft-anchored Git hosting bundled with Azure DevOps Services and Server.
★ 4.1 public
#7
Gitea
Lightweight self-hosted Git server, BSD-licensed, mature.
★ 4.6 public
#4
Sourcegraph
Code search and AI code intelligence (Cody) for monorepo enterprises.
★ 4.4 partial
Help the next buyer

Contribute your verified deal price

Pricing in B2B software is opaque because vendors want it that way. Verified buyer prices fix that, anonymously. Share what you actually paid for AWS CodeCommit; we’ll add it to the verified pricing dataset on this page (with company size band only, no identifying details).

Submit anonymously