Skip to content
Z Zendikt
Editorial verdict · Who it’s wrong for

Who shouldn’t buy Sterling?

A direct read on the buyers Sterling is the wrong fit for — sourced from the same editorial team that ranked the full Background Check Services category.

Worst for

New buyers without a specific Sterling commitment, mid-market buyers, marketplace and gig hiring (Checkr is stronger), and any buyer who finds active platform consolidation unacceptable.

For context: who it IS for

Existing Sterling enterprise customers running multi-year contracts who want continuity through the FA integration period. New buyers in Fortune 1000 with deep Workday or SuccessFactors ATS integration requirements.

Target size: 1,000-500,000+ · Enterprise global organizations

Why we say this

Editorial pulled these weaknesses from Sterling’s product card in our Top 10 Background Check Services for 2026:

  • ! Now operating as part of First Advantage; standalone roadmap effectively ended Q1 2025
  • ! Platform consolidation expected through 2027; service disruption already reported
  • ! Pricing opaque at enterprise tier; expect multi-year contracts with annual escalators
  • ! Customer service ratings declined 2022-2024 per G2 trend data
  • ! Modernization investments slowed during take-private and acquisition period
  • ! New buyers should consider FA-native contract instead of Sterling brand contract

If Sterling is wrong for you, consider these instead

Same Background Check Services category, different best-fit buyer.

Related editorial

Last updated 2026-05-10. Editorial verdict based on the published Top 10 Background Check Services for 2026 ranking. Disagree? Tell us.