Skip to content
Z Zendikt
Vendor trust scorecard

Vanta vendor trust score

Trust scoring is the “is this vendor a fair counterparty” question, deliberately separated from product quality. Six dimensions, dated, sourced where events warrant it.

7.9
/10
mixed
Verdict

Vanta's vendor trust profile is mixed. The dimension scores below show where to negotiate hard and what to monitor across a multi-year contract.

Vendor Trust Score

Is Vanta a trustworthy vendor?

7.9/10
Mixed
Pricing transparency
Published rates; no hidden fees
6.4
Contract fairness
Reasonable terms; no auto-renew traps
7.1
Incident response
How they handle outages and breaches
8.4
Post-acquisition behavior
Customer treatment after M&A or PE
8.8
Executive stability
Leadership churn over 24 months
8.7
Roadmap honesty
Public commitments held
7.9
Trust signal log
  • 2024-07-15
    Series C close of $150M at $2.45B post-money led by Sequoia + CapitalG
  • 2024-11-12
    NIST AI RMF and ISO 42001 framework coverage launched ahead of peers
  • 2025-02-20
    Per-employee-band pricing overages emerged as top G2/Reddit complaint theme
  • 2025-08-08
    Customer-support response-time degradation documented; named-CSM gated to Enterprise
Vendor Trust is scored independently of product quality. A great product from an unfair vendor still earns a low trust score.

How to read this score

  • Trust is separate from product quality. A vendor can ship great software and treat customers badly — or vice versa. We score the two independently.
  • 8.0+/10: strong. Few concerns at renewal or procurement.
  • 6.5–7.9: mixed. Negotiate hard on the lowest dimensions; monitor across the contract term.
  • 5.0–6.4: cautious. Add explicit mitigation language to the master agreement.
  • Below 5.0: concerning. Treat this as a contracted-risk evaluation, not a product-fit evaluation.
  • Updates: we re-verify scoring quarterly. Material trust events (acquisitions, breaches, leadership change, hostile contract terms) get logged on the timeline above.

Related editorial

Last updated 2026-05-10. Scoring methodology: editorial standards. Disagree? Tell us.