Skip to content
Z Zendikt
Vendor trust scorecard

OutSystems vendor trust score

Trust scoring is the “is this vendor a fair counterparty” question, deliberately separated from product quality. Six dimensions, dated, sourced where events warrant it.

6.3
/10
cautious
Verdict

OutSystems's vendor trust profile warrants caution. Below-average dimensions need explicit mitigation language in the contract.

Vendor Trust Score

Is OutSystems a trustworthy vendor?

6.3/10
Mixed
Pricing transparency
Published rates; no hidden fees
4.5
Contract fairness
Reasonable terms; no auto-renew traps
6.0
Incident response
How they handle outages and breaches
7.5
Post-acquisition behavior
Customer treatment after M&A or PE
6.5
Executive stability
Leadership churn over 24 months
7.0
Roadmap honesty
Public commitments held
6.5
Trust signal log
  • 2018-06-04
    KKR-led investment takes OutSystems control; PE-backed status begins
  • 2021-02-23
    Funding at $9.5B valuation
    Round led by Abdiel Capital and Tiger Global at the peak of the 2021 valuation cycle; widely cited as a heady-era number that has likely softened in subsequent rounds.
  • 2023-05-15
    OutSystems 11 cloud-native generation released
  • 2024-06-18
    Mentor AI assistant launched at NextStep
    Generative app-building; closes the perceived gap vs Mendix Maia and Power Apps Copilot.
  • 2025-04-22
    Customer reports of intensified renewal pricing motion
    Multiple G2 and TrustRadius reviews flagged increasingly aggressive renewal quote behavior consistent with PE owner pressure.
Vendor Trust is scored independently of product quality. A great product from an unfair vendor still earns a low trust score.

How to read this score

  • Trust is separate from product quality. A vendor can ship great software and treat customers badly — or vice versa. We score the two independently.
  • 8.0+/10: strong. Few concerns at renewal or procurement.
  • 6.5–7.9: mixed. Negotiate hard on the lowest dimensions; monitor across the contract term.
  • 5.0–6.4: cautious. Add explicit mitigation language to the master agreement.
  • Below 5.0: concerning. Treat this as a contracted-risk evaluation, not a product-fit evaluation.
  • Updates: we re-verify scoring quarterly. Material trust events (acquisitions, breaches, leadership change, hostile contract terms) get logged on the timeline above.

Related editorial

Last updated 2026-05-10. Scoring methodology: editorial standards. Disagree? Tell us.