Skip to content
Z Zendikt
Vendor trust scorecard

CloudHealth by Broadcom vendor trust score

Trust scoring is the “is this vendor a fair counterparty” question, deliberately separated from product quality. Six dimensions, dated, sourced where events warrant it.

5.0
/10
cautious
Verdict

CloudHealth by Broadcom's vendor trust profile warrants caution. Below-average dimensions need explicit mitigation language in the contract.

Vendor Trust Score

Is CloudHealth by Broadcom a trustworthy vendor?

5.0/10
Caution
Pricing transparency
Published rates; no hidden fees
3.5
Contract fairness
Reasonable terms; no auto-renew traps
4.5
Incident response
How they handle outages and breaches
7.0
Post-acquisition behavior
Customer treatment after M&A or PE
3.5
Executive stability
Leadership churn over 24 months
5.5
Roadmap honesty
Public commitments held
6.0
Trust signal log
  • 2018-08-27
    VMware acquired CloudHealth Technologies for $500M
  • 2023-11-22
    Broadcom completed $61B VMware acquisition
    Broadcom acquisition of VMware closed Nov 22, 2023; CloudHealth inherited Broadcom enterprise software portfolio model.
  • 2024-04-15
    Multiple customer reports of contract restructuring and price increases
    Reddit r/FinOps, G2, and LinkedIn reports of CloudHealth contract changes under Broadcom; reseller channel changes also reported.
  • 2024-09-30
    Support quality decline reported through 2024
  • 2025-06-18
    Multiple long-time CloudHealth customers publicly migrated to Vantage, Finout, or Apptio Cloudability
Vendor Trust is scored independently of product quality. A great product from an unfair vendor still earns a low trust score.

How to read this score

  • Trust is separate from product quality. A vendor can ship great software and treat customers badly — or vice versa. We score the two independently.
  • 8.0+/10: strong. Few concerns at renewal or procurement.
  • 6.5–7.9: mixed. Negotiate hard on the lowest dimensions; monitor across the contract term.
  • 5.0–6.4: cautious. Add explicit mitigation language to the master agreement.
  • Below 5.0: concerning. Treat this as a contracted-risk evaluation, not a product-fit evaluation.
  • Updates: we re-verify scoring quarterly. Material trust events (acquisitions, breaches, leadership change, hostile contract terms) get logged on the timeline above.

Related editorial

Last updated 2026-05-10. Scoring methodology: editorial standards. Disagree? Tell us.