Skip to content
Z Zendikt
Vendor trust scorecard

BeyondTrust Privileged Access vendor trust score

Trust scoring is the “is this vendor a fair counterparty” question, deliberately separated from product quality. Six dimensions, dated, sourced where events warrant it.

5.8
/10
cautious
Verdict

BeyondTrust Privileged Access's vendor trust profile warrants caution. Below-average dimensions need explicit mitigation language in the contract.

Vendor Trust Score

Is BeyondTrust Privileged Access a trustworthy vendor?

5.8/10
Caution
Pricing transparency
Published rates; no hidden fees
4.5
Contract fairness
Reasonable terms; no auto-renew traps
5.5
Incident response
How they handle outages and breaches
6.5
Post-acquisition behavior
Customer treatment after M&A or PE
5.5
Executive stability
Leadership churn over 24 months
6.5
Roadmap honesty
Public commitments held
6.5
Trust signal log
  • 2018-04-04
    Bomgar acquired BeyondTrust; combined under Francisco Partners
  • 2021-04-15
    Renewed PE control under Francisco Partners and Clearlake Capital
    Re-leveraged transaction triggered cost-discipline programs that customers later flagged in support and roadmap pacing.
  • 2024-12-08
    Nation-state breach of Remote Support cloud disclosed
    Compromised API key gave attackers access to a small number of Remote Support SaaS customer environments; subsequently linked to Salt Typhoon / PRC-affiliated activity.
  • 2025-02-10
    Post-breach remediation program disclosed; rotation of credentials and architecture reviews
Vendor Trust is scored independently of product quality. A great product from an unfair vendor still earns a low trust score.

How to read this score

  • Trust is separate from product quality. A vendor can ship great software and treat customers badly — or vice versa. We score the two independently.
  • 8.0+/10: strong. Few concerns at renewal or procurement.
  • 6.5–7.9: mixed. Negotiate hard on the lowest dimensions; monitor across the contract term.
  • 5.0–6.4: cautious. Add explicit mitigation language to the master agreement.
  • Below 5.0: concerning. Treat this as a contracted-risk evaluation, not a product-fit evaluation.
  • Updates: we re-verify scoring quarterly. Material trust events (acquisitions, breaches, leadership change, hostile contract terms) get logged on the timeline above.

Related editorial

Last updated 2026-05-17. Scoring methodology: editorial standards. Disagree? Tell us.