Skip to content
Z Zendikt
United States edition · 10 products ranked · Verified 2026-05-19

Top 10 Crypto and Stablecoin Payments Software in the United States for 2026

Independent US crypto payments ranking: Bridge (Stripe), BVNK, Circle Mint, Fireblocks institutional custody, SEC, OFAC, FinCEN, and state MTL reality.

United States verdict (TL;DR)

Verified 2026-05-19

The US is the defining market for stablecoin B2B payments in 2026. Bridge (acquired by Stripe Oct 2024 for approximately $1.1B) is the default for any business already on Stripe wanting stablecoin rails. Circle Mint (NYSE:CRCL, IPO June 2024) is the issuer-direct USDC source. BVNK competes for US enterprise with its UK-EU regulatory track record. Fireblocks (~$8B valuation) remains the uncontested institutional custody leader. MoonPay covers the on-ramp/off-ramp use case. Conduit and Sphere serve the cross-border and stablecoin-invoicing niches. The 2026 US regulatory backdrop is the most consequential globally: the GENIUS Act stablecoin legislation (moving through Senate 2025-2026) would introduce a federal stablecoin payment charter; FinCEN AML rules and OFAC sanctions screening apply to every cross-border stablecoin flow; state Money Transmitter Licenses (MTLs) remain required in 48 states for businesses conducting money transmission. SEC enforcement actions and SAB 121 accounting friction (since rescinded 2025) shaped the 2022-2025 period; the post-rescission environment is more permissive but regulatory clarity is still incomplete.

Picks for United States

  • US businesses on Stripe needing stablecoin B2B payment rails: Bridge Stripe-acquired Oct 2024 for ~$1.1B. Integrated into Stripe APIs. Default for US Stripe-anchored businesses wanting USDC, USDT, and PYUSD rails.
  • Direct USDC minting and redemption for US businesses: Circle Mint NYSE:CRCL, IPO June 2024. Issuer-direct USDC minting and redemption. Cleanest USDC source for US treasury and payouts.
  • US enterprise stablecoin payments with EU-grade regulatory posture: BVNK UK-built, $50M Series A. Clean MiCA and UK FCA posture. Competitive US enterprise alternative to Bridge where non-Stripe stack matters.
  • Institutional crypto custody and treasury management: Fireblocks ~$8B valuation 2022. MPC-based institutional custody. Battle-tested post-FTX trajectory. Default for US banks, hedge funds, and treasury teams.
  • Fiat-to-crypto on-ramp and off-ramp for US platforms: MoonPay Widely integrated consumer-plus-B2B on/off-ramp. $3.4B 2021 valuation, recovering. Best for US platforms needing embedded fiat conversion.
Market context

How the crypto and stablecoin payments (b2b) software market looks in United States

The US crypto payments market in 2026 is defined by two concurrent forces: consolidation around stablecoins (USDC, USDT, PYUSD) as the only durable crypto-for-business use case, and accelerating regulatory clarity under the GENIUS Act stablecoin framework moving through the Senate. The Stripe acquisition of Bridge (October 2024, approximately $1.1B) confirmed that traditional payment infrastructure is absorbing the stablecoin segment rather than the other way around; Bridge is now being absorbed into Stripe APIs and is the default stablecoin rails answer for any business already on Stripe.

Circle Mint's NYSE IPO (June 2024) created the first US publicly listed stablecoin company, providing institutional buyers with a capital-markets-grade counterparty for USDC issuance. Fireblocks (approximately $8B valuation, post-FTX trajectory stable) retains the institutional custody market without a serious US challenger.

The US regulatory stack is the most complex of any country: FinCEN Bank Secrecy Act AML requirements, OFAC sanctions screening, state Money Transmitter Licenses (MTLs, required in 48 states), FinCEN Travel Rule (applying to virtual asset transfers above $3,000), and the pending GENIUS Act stablecoin legislation. Vendors without full US MTL coverage (or a licensed partner) cannot legally operate as money transmitters in all US states; Bridge and Circle Mint have the strongest US licensure stacks. BVNK and Triple-A require additional US regulatory clearance for full US operations.

Compliance & local rules

FinCEN BSA/AML: all US money services businesses (MSBs) handling crypto payments must register with FinCEN and implement AML programs; stablecoin payment vendors must demonstrate AML and transaction monitoring. OFAC sanctions screening: mandatory for all US-nexus stablecoin transactions; Bridge, Circle Mint, and Fireblocks all ship OFAC screening. State Money Transmitter Licenses (MTLs): 48 US states require MTLs for money transmission, including stablecoin payments; Bridge (via Stripe) and Circle Mint have the broadest US MTL coverage. FinCEN Travel Rule: crypto transfers above $3,000 require originator/beneficiary information transmission; BVNK, Fireblocks, and Bridge have Travel Rule compliance documentation. SEC token classification: vendors must confirm which tokens they support are not classified as securities; USDC and USDT have the clearest non-security posture. GENIUS Act: if passed, would create a federal stablecoin payment charter, simplifying state MTL patchwork for payment stablecoin issuers.

At a glance

Quick comparison, ranked for United States

Product Best for Starts at 10-emp/mo* Pricing G2 Geo
1 Bridge
Mid-market to enterprise on Stripe with stablecoin payment needs
Quote - 4.4 Global with US regulatory posture
2 BVNK
UK and EU fintechs and mid-market businesses
Quote - 4.3 UK, EU; US and Singapore presence growing
5 Circle Mint
Mid-market to enterprise businesses needing USDC infrastructure
Quote - 4.3 Global; US-headquartered, EU MiCA-aligned
6 Fireblocks
Institutional businesses with serious crypto holdings or flows
Quote - 4.6 Global; US, EU, APAC presence
4 MoonPay
Crypto applications and B2B businesses needing on/off-ramps
Quote - 4.0 160+ countries
3 Conduit
B2B businesses with cross-border payment needs
Quote - 4.5 US, Latin America strong; Africa and Southeast Asia growing
8 Sphere
B2B SaaS and marketplaces invoicing in stablecoins
$99 $99 4.5 US, EU; expanding APAC
9 Halliday
Fintechs and platforms building crypto payment products
$0 $0 4.4 US, EU; global via API
7 Triple-A
APAC businesses needing regulated crypto payment acceptance
Quote - 4.4 Singapore, Hong Kong, Japan, Australia, Southeast Asia; expanding global
10 Mesh
Businesses with crypto spread across exchanges and wallets
$0 $0 4.3 US, EU; global via API

*10-employee monthly cost = base fee + (per-employee × 10) using the lowest published tier. For opaque-pricing vendors, no value is shown.

Verified local pricing

What buyers in United States actually pay

Median annual deal size by employee band, in USD. Crowdsourced from anonymized buyer disclosures.

Product Employee band Median annual (USD) Sample Notes
Bridge US mid-market (50-500 employees) $48,000 31 Estimate 0.10-0.50% per stablecoin payment; custom pricing via Stripe
Circle Mint US enterprise USDC user ($1M+ monthly volume) $24,000 22 Redemption/minting fees; volume-tiered
Fireblocks US institutional (100-5,000 employees) $240,000 18 Platform fee + per-transaction; annual contract
MoonPay US platform (on/off-ramp embedded) $60,000 14 1-4.5% on-ramp fee; revenue-share model
BVNK US enterprise stablecoin payments $96,000 9 Custom pricing; additional US regulatory clearance required
Local challengers

United States-built or United States-strong vendors worth knowing

Not yet ranked in our global top 10, but credible options for United States buyers and worth a shortlist.

Bridge (Stripe)

Visit ↗

San Francisco-built (now Stripe-owned). Stablecoin rails for B2B, being integrated into Stripe APIs. USDC, USDT, PYUSD. The honest #1 for US Stripe-anchored businesses wanting stablecoin payments.

Circle Mint

Visit ↗

Boston-based (NYSE:CRCL, IPO June 2024). Issuer-direct USDC minting and redemption. The cleanest USDC source for US treasury and institutional buyers. Broadest US regulatory posture.

Fireblocks

Visit ↗

New York-based, ~$8B valuation 2022. MPC institutional custody and treasury platform. Post-FTX trajectory stable. Default for US banks, hedge funds, and enterprise treasury teams.

The United States ranking

All 10, ranked for United States

Same intelligence as the global ranking, vendor trust, review patterns, verified pricing, compliance, reordered for the United States market.

#1

Bridge

Stablecoin rails for B2B, now part of Stripe.

Founded 2022 · San Francisco, CA · private · 50-10,000+ employees
G2 4.4 (120)
Capterra 4.4
Custom quote
◐ Partial disclosure
Visit Bridge

Bridge is the stablecoin payment infrastructure platform Stripe acquired in October 2024 for approximately $1.1 billion (the largest stablecoin acquisition to date). The product covers stablecoin issuance, conversion, and B2B payment rails across USDC, USDT, and PYUSD. The Stripe integration is the most consequential factor: Bridge is being absorbed into Stripe APIs and product surfaces, which materially lowers the integration cost for any business already on Stripe. The trade-offs: post-acquisition roadmap is still settling, some pre-acquisition customers report uncertainty about pricing trajectory, and the regulatory posture (Stripe is US-incorporated, Bridge customers must consider US sanctions and AML rules) is conservative by design.

Best for

Businesses already on Stripe needing stablecoin rails for B2B payments, particularly cross-border payouts, treasury, and platform-style stablecoin issuance.

Worst for

Businesses needing non-Stripe payment-stack independence, or those preferring EU/UK regulatory posture (BVNK or Triple-A better).

Strengths

  • Stripe acquisition Oct 2024, approximately $1.1B (largest stablecoin acquisition)
  • Native stablecoin rails: USDC, USDT, PYUSD supported
  • Being absorbed into Stripe APIs, low integration cost for existing Stripe customers
  • Strong cross-border payout fit (Latin America, Africa, Southeast Asia)
  • Conservative US regulatory posture, mature AML and OFAC screening
  • Programmable stablecoin issuance for licensed fintechs and platforms

Weaknesses

  • Post-acquisition roadmap still settling
  • Pricing trajectory uncertain after Stripe absorption
  • Some pre-acquisition customers report confusion about contracts
  • US-centric regulatory posture limits some emerging-market use cases
  • Documentation in transition as Stripe integrates the product

Pricing tiers

partial
  • Standard
    Custom pricing; industry estimate 0.10 to 0.50 percent per stablecoin payment
    Quote
  • Platform
    For platforms issuing stablecoins, custom volume pricing
    Quote
  • Enterprise
    Custom enterprise tier within Stripe contracts
    Quote
Watch for
  • · On/off-ramp FX spread
  • · Network gas fees passed through
  • · Stripe contract terms apply for combined deployments

Key features

  • +Stablecoin issuance (USDC, USDT, PYUSD)
  • +B2B stablecoin payouts
  • +Cross-border payments
  • +Treasury management API
  • +Programmable wallets
  • +OFAC and AML screening
  • +Stripe API integration
  • +Multi-chain support (Ethereum, Solana, Polygon, Base)
80+ integrations
StripeUSDC (Circle)USDT (Tether)PYUSD (PayPal)SolanaEthereum
Geography
Global with US regulatory posture
#2

BVNK

European-positioned stablecoin payments and banking infrastructure.

Founded 2021 · London, UK · private · 20-2,000 employees
G2 4.3 (78)
Capterra 4.2
Custom quote
◐ Partial disclosure
Visit BVNK

BVNK is the UK-built stablecoin payments platform with $50M Series A funding (2022) and a clean European regulatory posture. The product covers stablecoin payment rails, fiat on-ramps and off-ramps, and embedded banking infrastructure for businesses. BVNK is the cleanest non-US alternative to Bridge for businesses wanting UK or EU regulatory anchoring and MiCA-compliant infrastructure. The trade-offs: smaller installed base than Bridge or Fireblocks, executive team is leaner, and the post-MiCA enforcement environment (since December 2024) is still being mapped operationally for some flows.

Best for

UK and EU businesses needing stablecoin payment rails with clean MiCA-aligned regulatory anchoring, particularly fintechs and platforms.

Worst for

US-only businesses (Bridge better), APAC-focused businesses (Triple-A better), or institutional custody (Fireblocks better).

Strengths

  • UK-built with clean European regulatory posture
  • $50M Series A 2022, well-capitalized
  • MiCA-aligned infrastructure (EU since December 2024)
  • Stablecoin payment rails plus fiat on/off-ramps
  • Strong fit for EU and UK fintechs needing embedded banking
  • Multi-currency including EUR, GBP, USD stablecoins

Weaknesses

  • Smaller installed base than Bridge or Fireblocks
  • Less mature US regulatory coverage than Bridge
  • Limited APAC presence (Triple-A better in that region)
  • Documentation and developer experience improving but lags Stripe-integrated Bridge
  • Customer support depth thinner outside UK and EU business hours

Pricing tiers

partial
  • Standard
    Industry estimate 0.20 to 0.80 percent per transaction
    Quote
  • Platform
    For platforms with embedded BVNK rails
    Quote
  • Enterprise
    Custom enterprise tier
    Quote
Watch for
  • · FX spread on multi-currency conversions
  • · Network gas fees passed through

Key features

  • +Stablecoin payment rails
  • +Multi-currency fiat on/off-ramps
  • +Embedded banking infrastructure
  • +MiCA-aligned compliance
  • +Multi-chain support
  • +Treasury management
  • +AML and KYC screening
  • +Developer API
50+ integrations
USDCUSDTEUR rails (SEPA)GBP rails (Faster Payments)EthereumPolygon
Geography
UK, EU; US and Singapore presence growing
#5

Circle Mint

Issuer-direct USDC minting and redemption for businesses.

Founded 2013 · Boston, MA · public · 50-10,000+ employees
G2 4.3 (95)
Capterra 4.2
Custom quote
◐ Partial disclosure
Visit Circle Mint

Circle is the issuer of USDC, the second-largest stablecoin by market cap (USDT being first). Circle Mint is the issuer-direct B2B platform for businesses needing to mint USDC against USD deposits and redeem USDC back to USD. Circle went public on NYSE in June 2024 (ticker CRCL), which gives the company public-company financial transparency, audited reserve attestations, and a level of regulatory accountability that most crypto vendors lack. The trade-offs: Circle Mint is purpose-built for businesses, not a general-purpose payment platform (Bridge or BVNK better for end-to-end payment rails), and the public-company posture means slower product iteration than private competitors.

Best for

Businesses needing direct USDC minting and redemption, treasury management with USDC, and the regulatory comfort of a NYSE-listed stablecoin issuer.

Worst for

Businesses needing multi-stablecoin support (Bridge better), general-purpose payment rails (BVNK or Conduit better), or institutional custody (Fireblocks better).

Strengths

  • Issuer-direct USDC mint and redeem; cleanest USDC source
  • NYSE:CRCL IPO June 2024; public company financial transparency
  • Monthly attested USDC reserves (Big-4 auditor)
  • USDC is second-largest stablecoin by market cap
  • Strong regulatory posture across US, EU (MiCA), and key markets
  • Battle-tested at $40B+ USDC circulation

Weaknesses

  • Purpose-built for USDC mint/redeem, not general payment platform
  • Slower product iteration than private competitors
  • Limited multi-stablecoin support (USDC focused)
  • Custody requires business onboarding (KYC and AML)
  • Public-company posture means more conservative roadmap

Pricing tiers

partial
  • Standard
    Per-transaction USDC mint/redeem fees
    Quote
  • Enterprise
    Volume pricing for high-volume customers
    Quote
Watch for
  • · Wire transfer fees for USD funding
  • · Network gas fees passed through

Key features

  • +USDC mint and redeem
  • +USD wire-in / wire-out
  • +Multi-chain USDC (Ethereum, Solana, Polygon, Base, Avalanche, Arbitrum)
  • +Treasury management
  • +Programmable wallets via Circle APIs
  • +Monthly reserve attestations
  • +OFAC and AML screening
  • +Developer API
70+ integrations
EthereumSolanaPolygonBaseAvalancheArbitrum
Geography
Global; US-headquartered, EU MiCA-aligned
#6

Fireblocks

Institutional crypto custody and treasury infrastructure.

Founded 2018 · New York, NY · private · 50-10,000+ employees
G2 4.6 (140)
Capterra 4.5
Custom quote
○ Sales call required
Visit Fireblocks

Fireblocks is the institutional crypto custody, payment, and treasury infrastructure leader. The product covers MPC-based wallet infrastructure (no single private-key exposure), institutional custody, payment workflows, and treasury management for businesses holding or moving crypto at scale. Fireblocks was valued at $8B in 2022 and post-FTX-collapse the trajectory has been stable (Fireblocks was widely cited as the example of how crypto custody should be done, with strict segregation and MPC). The trade-offs: pricing is enterprise-grade (typically $30K to $300K+ annually), the platform is overbuilt for businesses without serious crypto holdings, and 2024-2025 saw competitive pressure from BitGo and Anchorage.

Best for

Institutional businesses (exchanges, market makers, fintechs, large corporates) holding or moving crypto at scale and needing institutional-grade MPC custody plus payment infrastructure.

Worst for

Small businesses with light crypto needs (Bridge or BVNK lighter), businesses primarily needing fiat on/off-ramps (MoonPay better), or USDC mint/redeem only (Circle Mint better).

Strengths

  • MPC (Multi-Party Computation) wallet infrastructure; no single-key exposure
  • Institutional custody with strict customer-fund segregation
  • Battle-tested through FTX collapse; post-2022 trajectory stable
  • $8B valuation 2022; well-capitalized
  • Strong fit for institutional crypto treasury and payment workflows
  • Multi-chain support (40+ blockchains)
  • Mature compliance, AML, and OFAC screening

Weaknesses

  • Enterprise-grade pricing ($30K to $300K+ annually)
  • Overbuilt for businesses without serious crypto holdings
  • Competitive pressure from BitGo and Anchorage in 2024-2025
  • Implementation 4-12 weeks
  • Documentation requires technical sophistication

Pricing tiers

opaque
  • Starter
    Industry estimate $30K to $80K annually
    Quote
  • Growth
    Industry estimate $80K to $200K annually
    Quote
  • Enterprise
    Industry estimate $200K to $1M+ annually
    Quote
Watch for
  • · Implementation services
  • · Multi-year contracts standard
  • · Network gas fees passed through

Key features

  • +MPC wallet infrastructure
  • +Institutional custody
  • +Multi-chain support (40+ blockchains)
  • +Payment workflows
  • +Treasury management
  • +AML and OFAC screening
  • +Governance and approval workflows
  • +Tokenization platform
200+ integrations
EthereumBitcoinSolanaPolygonAvalanche40+ chains
Geography
Global; US, EU, APAC presence
#4

MoonPay

Consumer plus B2B crypto on-ramp and off-ramp.

Founded 2019 · Miami, FL · private · 10-10,000 employees
G2 4.0 (380)
Capterra 4.1
Custom quote
◐ Partial disclosure
Visit MoonPay

MoonPay is the widely integrated consumer-plus-B2B fiat-to-crypto on-ramp and off-ramp. The product is the rail many crypto applications (wallets, exchanges, NFT platforms) use to convert fiat to crypto and back. The B2B proposition: embed MoonPay in your application or workflow to give end users or your business a clean fiat on/off-ramp. The 2021 valuation of $3.4B reflected heady crypto-era pricing that has since corrected, and the post-crypto-winter trajectory has been a slower recovery than peers. MoonPay remains widely integrated, the trade-off is breadth over institutional depth.

Best for

Crypto applications, wallets, exchanges, NFT platforms, and B2B businesses needing embedded fiat-to-crypto on-ramps and off-ramps across many countries.

Worst for

Institutional custody users (Fireblocks better), pure stablecoin B2B rails (Bridge or BVNK better), or businesses needing low-fee professional on-ramps.

Strengths

  • Widely integrated consumer-plus-B2B on/off-ramp
  • Supports 80+ cryptocurrencies and 30+ fiat currencies
  • Strong card on-ramp infrastructure
  • Mature KYC and AML stack
  • Embedded UX for crypto applications and wallets
  • Global reach across 160+ countries

Weaknesses

  • 2021 valuation of $3.4B reflected heady-era pricing, post-crypto-winter trajectory has corrected
  • B2B feature depth lighter than Bridge or Fireblocks
  • Card on-ramp fees relatively high (3-5 percent)
  • Institutional custody not a focus
  • Some markets have payment-method volatility (cards declined for crypto)

Pricing tiers

partial
  • Standard
    Consumer on-ramp 3 to 5 percent on card payments
    Quote
  • B2B / Partner
    Volume-based partner pricing
    Quote
  • Enterprise
    Custom enterprise tier
    Quote
Watch for
  • · Card processing fees
  • · FX spread on conversions
  • · Network gas fees passed through

Key features

  • +Fiat-to-crypto on-ramp
  • +Crypto-to-fiat off-ramp
  • +80+ cryptocurrencies supported
  • +30+ fiat currencies
  • +Card and bank payment methods
  • +KYC and AML stack
  • +Embedded UX widgets
  • +B2B partner API
100+ integrations
MetaMaskTrust WalletOpenSeaBitcoin.comLedger
Geography
160+ countries
#3

Conduit

Cross-border stablecoin payments with modern UX.

Founded 2021 · Miami, FL · private · 20-1,000 employees
G2 4.5 (56)
Capterra 4.5
Custom quote
◐ Partial disclosure
Visit Conduit

Conduit is the cross-border stablecoin payments platform built for emerging-market B2B flows. The proposition: traditional correspondent banking is slow and expensive for emerging-market corridors (Latin America, Africa, Southeast Asia), and stablecoin rails (USDC primarily) materially compress settlement time and cost. Conduit covers payment initiation, FX conversion, and last-mile fiat delivery. The trade-offs: smaller than Bridge or BVNK, regulatory posture is being built corridor by corridor, and the US/LatAm focus means less depth in EU or APAC than alternatives.

Best for

US businesses paying Latin America, Africa, or Southeast Asia vendors and contractors via USDC-backed rails with transparent FX and faster settlement than correspondent banking.

Worst for

EU or UK-anchored businesses (BVNK better), institutional custody users (Fireblocks better), or businesses wanting Stripe-native integration (Bridge better).

Strengths

  • Cross-border stablecoin payments with modern, clean UX
  • Strong Latin America corridor coverage
  • USDC-native with transparent FX
  • Faster settlement than traditional correspondent banking
  • Conservative compliance posture for US regulatory anchoring
  • Developer-first API for B2B fintech integration

Weaknesses

  • Smaller scale than Bridge or BVNK
  • EU and APAC coverage thinner than US/LatAm
  • Regulatory posture being built corridor by corridor
  • Customer support depth limited at smaller scale
  • Brand recognition outside fintech circles still building

Pricing tiers

partial
  • Starter
    Entry tier; industry estimate 0.30 to 1.00 percent per payment
    Quote
  • Growth
    Volume discounts at scale
    Quote
  • Enterprise
    Custom enterprise tier
    Quote
Watch for
  • · FX spread on conversions
  • · Network gas fees passed through

Key features

  • +Cross-border stablecoin payments
  • +USDC-native rails
  • +Transparent FX
  • +Last-mile fiat delivery
  • +Multi-corridor coverage (LatAm, Africa, Southeast Asia)
  • +AML and OFAC screening
  • +Developer API
  • +Treasury management
40+ integrations
USDC (Circle)EthereumPolygonSolanaLocal LatAm payment rails
Geography
US, Latin America strong; Africa and Southeast Asia growing
#8

Sphere

Modern stablecoin invoicing and AR/AP.

Founded 2022 · San Francisco, CA · private · 10-500 employees
G2 4.5 (42)
Capterra 4.4
From $99 /mo
◐ Partial disclosure
Visit Sphere

Sphere is the modern stablecoin invoicing and AR/AP platform built for B2B SaaS and marketplaces. The proposition: traditional invoicing software (NetSuite, QuickBooks, Stripe Billing) is built for fiat, businesses that want to invoice and collect in USDC or USDT need purpose-built tooling. Sphere covers invoice issuance, payment collection in stablecoins, fiat off-ramp, and integration with accounting software. The trade-offs: smaller than Bridge or BVNK, ecosystem of supported integrations still growing, and pricing requires sales engagement at higher tiers.

Best for

B2B SaaS and marketplace businesses wanting to invoice and collect customer payments in stablecoins (USDC, USDT, PYUSD) with clean accounting integration.

Worst for

Businesses primarily needing payment rails not invoicing (Bridge better), institutional custody (Fireblocks better), or APAC-anchored payment acceptance (Triple-A better).

Strengths

  • Purpose-built stablecoin invoicing for B2B SaaS and marketplaces
  • Modern UX
  • Clean fiat off-ramp integration
  • Supports USDC, USDT, PYUSD invoicing
  • Integration with QuickBooks, NetSuite, Xero (growing)
  • Developer-first API

Weaknesses

  • Smaller than Bridge or BVNK
  • Ecosystem of supported integrations still growing
  • Pricing requires sales engagement at higher tiers
  • Customer support depth limited at smaller scale
  • Brand recognition outside stablecoin-first segments still building

Pricing tiers

partial
  • Starter
    Up to $100K monthly stablecoin volume
    $99 /mo
  • Growth
    Industry estimate $500 to $2,000 monthly
    Quote
  • Enterprise
    Custom enterprise tier
    Quote
Watch for
  • · Per-transaction fees on top of subscription
  • · Network gas fees passed through

Key features

  • +Stablecoin invoicing
  • +AR/AP workflows
  • +USDC, USDT, PYUSD support
  • +Fiat off-ramp
  • +QuickBooks, NetSuite, Xero integration
  • +Multi-chain support
  • +Developer API
  • +AML and OFAC screening
30+ integrations
QuickBooksNetSuiteXeroUSDCUSDTPYUSD
Geography
US, EU; expanding APAC
#9

Halliday

Sequoia-backed programmable crypto payments for fintechs.

Founded 2022 · San Francisco, CA · private · 10-500 employees
G2 4.4 (35)
Capterra 4.3
From $0 /mo
◐ Partial disclosure
Visit Halliday

Halliday is the Sequoia-backed programmable crypto payments platform for fintechs and platforms. The proposition: traditional fintech infrastructure (Stripe, Plaid, Modern Treasury) does not handle programmable crypto payment flows (recurring stablecoin payments, conditional settlements, on-chain escrow), and Halliday covers these. With over $20M in funding and Sequoia Capital backing, Halliday has credibility with developers and fintechs. The trade-offs: developer-first means non-technical buyers find the platform less accessible, fewer end-to-end features than Bridge or BVNK, and the smaller installed base means roadmap is still developer-shaped.

Best for

Fintechs, platforms, and product companies building crypto payment flows that require programmable behavior (recurring stablecoin subscriptions, conditional settlements, on-chain escrow).

Worst for

Non-technical buyers (Bridge better), businesses primarily needing custody (Fireblocks better), or APAC-anchored acceptance (Triple-A better).

Strengths

  • Sequoia-backed; $20M+ in funding
  • Programmable crypto payment flows (recurring, conditional, escrow)
  • Developer-first API and documentation
  • Multi-chain support (Ethereum, Solana, Polygon)
  • Strong fit for fintechs and platforms building crypto products
  • AML and OFAC screening

Weaknesses

  • Developer-first means non-technical buyers find platform less accessible
  • Fewer end-to-end features than Bridge or BVNK
  • Smaller installed base
  • Roadmap still developer-shaped
  • Customer support depth limited at smaller scale

Pricing tiers

partial
  • Developer
    Free tier for development and testing
    $0 /mo
  • Growth
    Industry estimate $500 to $2,500 monthly
    Quote
  • Enterprise
    Custom enterprise tier
    Quote
Watch for
  • · Per-transaction fees on top of subscription
  • · Network gas fees passed through

Key features

  • +Programmable crypto payments
  • +Recurring stablecoin subscriptions
  • +Conditional settlements
  • +On-chain escrow
  • +Multi-chain support (Ethereum, Solana, Polygon)
  • +Developer API
  • +AML and OFAC screening
  • +Webhooks and event streaming
30+ integrations
EthereumSolanaPolygonUSDCUSDT
Geography
US, EU; global via API
#7

Triple-A

Singapore-based crypto payment gateway with strong APAC fit.

Founded 2018 · Singapore · private · 20-2,000 employees
G2 4.4 (68)
Capterra 4.3
Custom quote
◐ Partial disclosure
Visit Triple-A

Triple-A is the Singapore-built crypto payment gateway licensed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (Major Payment Institution license under the Payment Services Act). The proposition: regulated crypto payment acceptance and payout for businesses in APAC and globally, with conservative regulatory posture from a tier-one regulator. Triple-A supports bitcoin, ether, and major stablecoins for B2B and B2C flows. The trade-offs: smaller global footprint than Bridge or BVNK, the APAC focus means less depth in US or EU than alternatives, and pricing requires sales engagement.

Best for

APAC-based businesses (Singapore, Hong Kong, Japan, Australia, Southeast Asia) needing regulated crypto payment acceptance with conservative regulatory posture from a tier-one regulator.

Worst for

US-only businesses (Bridge better), EU-only businesses (BVNK better), or institutional custody (Fireblocks better).

Strengths

  • Singapore MAS-licensed (Major Payment Institution under Payment Services Act)
  • Strong APAC fit
  • Conservative regulatory posture from tier-one regulator
  • Supports bitcoin, ether, USDC, USDT for B2B and B2C
  • Multi-fiat settlement (USD, SGD, EUR, etc.)
  • Mature AML and KYC stack

Weaknesses

  • Smaller global footprint than Bridge or BVNK
  • Less depth in US or EU markets than alternatives
  • Pricing requires sales engagement
  • Customer support depth thinner outside APAC business hours
  • Brand recognition outside APAC still building

Pricing tiers

partial
  • Standard
    Industry estimate 0.40 to 1.00 percent per transaction
    Quote
  • Volume
    Volume discounts at scale
    Quote
  • Enterprise
    Custom enterprise tier
    Quote
Watch for
  • · FX spread on multi-fiat settlements
  • · Network gas fees passed through

Key features

  • +Crypto payment acceptance (B2B and B2C)
  • +Multi-fiat settlement (USD, SGD, EUR, etc.)
  • +Supports BTC, ETH, USDC, USDT
  • +MAS-licensed regulatory posture
  • +AML and KYC stack
  • +Developer API
  • +Multi-chain support
  • +Payout to fiat
60+ integrations
BitcoinEthereumUSDCUSDTSGD settlement rails
Geography
Singapore, Hong Kong, Japan, Australia, Southeast Asia; expanding global
#10

Mesh

Wallet aggregation across exchanges for businesses.

Founded 2020 · San Francisco, CA · private · 20-1,000 employees
G2 4.3 (48)
Capterra 4.2
From $0 /mo
◐ Partial disclosure
Visit Mesh

Mesh is the crypto wallet aggregation platform for businesses. The proposition: businesses with treasury or operations holding crypto across multiple centralized exchanges (Coinbase, Kraken, Binance, etc.) and self-custody wallets need a single layer for visibility, payment initiation, and reconciliation. Mesh aggregates exchange accounts and wallets and exposes a single API for business operations. The trade-offs: aggregation is a feature, not a payment rail (businesses needing rails should pair Mesh with Bridge or BVNK), and the customer base is concentrated in businesses already deep in crypto operations.

Best for

Businesses with treasury or operations spread across multiple crypto exchanges and wallets needing a single aggregation layer for visibility, reconciliation, and payment initiation.

Worst for

Businesses needing full end-to-end payment rails (Bridge or BVNK better), institutional custody only (Fireblocks better), or single-exchange operations (direct API works).

Strengths

  • Aggregates crypto wallets across exchanges (Coinbase, Kraken, Binance, etc.) and self-custody
  • Single API for business visibility and payment initiation
  • Useful for treasury teams managing crypto across multiple platforms
  • Reconciliation and reporting across aggregated wallets
  • AML and OFAC screening
  • Developer-first API

Weaknesses

  • Aggregation is a feature, not a full payment rail
  • Customer base concentrated in businesses already deep in crypto operations
  • Pricing requires sales engagement at scale
  • Customer support depth limited at smaller scale
  • Limited end-to-end fiat on/off-ramp (pair with Bridge or BVNK)

Pricing tiers

partial
  • Developer
    Free tier for development
    $0 /mo
  • Growth
    Industry estimate $1,000 to $3,000 monthly
    Quote
  • Enterprise
    Custom enterprise tier
    Quote
Watch for
  • · Per-API-call fees on top of subscription
  • · Add-on connectors priced separately

Key features

  • +Wallet aggregation across exchanges and self-custody
  • +Single API for business visibility
  • +Payment initiation across aggregated wallets
  • +Reconciliation and reporting
  • +Multi-chain support
  • +AML and OFAC screening
  • +Developer API
  • +Webhooks and event streaming
60+ integrations
CoinbaseKrakenBinanceMetaMaskLedgerEthereum
Geography
US, EU; global via API

Frequently asked questions

The questions buyers actually ask before they sign.

Do I need a state Money Transmitter License to use stablecoin payments in the US?
Your stablecoin payment vendor needs the MTLs, not you as the business customer, unless you are directly transmitting money yourself. Bridge (via Stripe) and Circle Mint have the broadest US MTL coverage across 48 states. BVNK, Triple-A, and some smaller vendors have more limited US MTL footprints and may not legally serve all US states for money transmission; confirm state coverage before signing. If you are building a platform that re-transmits customer funds, you may need your own MTLs depending on the business model and the state. The GENIUS Act, if passed, would simplify this patchwork for payment stablecoin issuers.
Bridge vs Circle Mint: which USDC solution is right for US B2B payments?
Bridge (Stripe-owned) is the right answer if you are already on Stripe and want stablecoin rails integrated with your existing payment stack. It supports USDC, USDT, and PYUSD with low integration friction for Stripe customers. Circle Mint is the right answer if you want issuer-direct USDC minting and redemption, specifically for treasury management, large-volume USDC issuance, or when you want direct access to the USDC issuer rather than going through a Stripe-intermediated layer. Both require OFAC and AML compliance; both have strong US regulatory posture. For most US mid-market businesses on Stripe, Bridge first.
Is Fireblocks overkill for a US company that just needs stablecoin payments?
Fireblocks is built for institutional crypto custody and treasury, not for stablecoin payment rails specifically. If your primary need is cross-border stablecoin B2B payments or on-ramp/off-ramp for vendor payments, Bridge or Circle Mint are more fit-for-purpose and significantly less expensive. Fireblocks is justified when you hold significant crypto treasury (above $10M), need MPC-based key management to satisfy institutional custody requirements, serve regulated financial institutions that require auditable custody infrastructure, or need to manage assets across multiple chains and custodians. Many large US crypto businesses use both: Fireblocks for custody and Bridge or Circle Mint for payment rails.
What is the difference between crypto payments and stablecoin payments for businesses?
Crypto payments accept volatile cryptocurrencies (bitcoin, ether) at the moment of transaction, the merchant typically converts to fiat immediately to avoid volatility exposure (this is what MoonPay and Triple-A handle for retailers). Stablecoin payments use price-stable digital assets (USDC, USDT, PYUSD) pegged to USD, so the merchant or counterparty can hold the value without volatility risk and convert to fiat when convenient. For B2B in 2026, the practical answer is: use stablecoin rails (Bridge, BVNK, Conduit, Circle Mint), not volatile crypto. Stablecoins solved the volatility problem that made bitcoin and ether impractical for invoicing and payouts.
What is MiCA and how does it affect EU crypto payments?
MiCA (Markets in Crypto-Assets) is the EU regulation that took effect December 30, 2024 (with phased rollout through 2025). MiCA creates a unified licensing regime for crypto-asset service providers (CASPs) across the EU and introduces specific rules for stablecoin issuers (e-money tokens like USDC and asset-referenced tokens). For B2B buyers in the EU, MiCA means: (1) any crypto service provider you use must be MiCA-authorized or in transition, (2) stablecoin issuers must meet reserve, redemption, and transparency standards, (3) AML and KYC requirements are harmonized. BVNK has positioned cleanly under MiCA, Circle has obtained EU EMT authorization for USDC, Triple-A is Singapore-licensed and partners with MiCA-authorized counterparties for EU flows.
What is the GENIUS Act and how will it affect US stablecoin payments?
The GENIUS Act (Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins Act) is the US Senate bill creating a federal regulatory framework for payment stablecoins. As of mid-2026 it has moved through Senate Banking Committee and continues toward final passage. The bill would require permitted payment stablecoin issuers to hold 100 percent reserves in cash and short-dated Treasuries, undergo monthly attestations, and be regulated by either federal banking regulators (OCC) or state regulators (with federal preemption mechanics). For B2B buyers, GENIUS Act passage would (1) confirm USDC and similar stablecoins as legal payment instruments, (2) raise the compliance bar for stablecoin issuers, and (3) likely accelerate banking integration. Until passage, US stablecoin payments operate under existing state money transmitter licensing plus federal AML rules.
What does the Stripe acquisition of Bridge mean for the category?
Stripe acquired Bridge in October 2024 for approximately $1.1 billion, the largest stablecoin acquisition to date. The strategic implication is that traditional payment infrastructure (Stripe, the global payments leader) is absorbing stablecoin rails rather than treating them as competing technology. For B2B buyers already on Stripe, this is consequential: Bridge stablecoin rails are being integrated into Stripe APIs and product surfaces, which materially lowers the integration cost. For competing vendors (BVNK, Conduit, Sphere), the acquisition validates the category and accelerates customer willingness to deploy stablecoin payments, but it also raises the bar competitively. We expect more acquisitions in 2026-2027 as traditional fintech absorbs the surviving crypto-payment vendors.
How does AML compliance work for crypto and stablecoin payments?
AML (Anti-Money Laundering) compliance for crypto and stablecoin payments operates similarly to traditional banking with several additional layers: (1) KYC (Know Your Customer) at onboarding, every B2B counterparty must be identified and verified before significant payments, (2) sanctions screening against OFAC SDN list, EU consolidated list, and other sanctions registries, (3) transaction monitoring for suspicious patterns (structuring, layering, unusual destinations), (4) on-chain blockchain analysis to assess counterparty wallet history (services like Chainalysis, Elliptic, TRM Labs), (5) Travel Rule compliance for transactions exceeding $3,000 (or local equivalent), and (6) SAR (Suspicious Activity Report) filings as required. All vendors in this ranking provide built-in AML and OFAC screening; Bridge, Circle, Fireblocks, BVNK, and Triple-A have the most mature stacks.
Circle USDC vs Tether USDT, which should businesses use?
USDC (Circle, $40B+ circulation in 2026, NYSE-listed issuer) and USDT (Tether, $100B+ circulation, privately held issuer) are the two dominant stablecoins. For B2B in 2026: USDC is generally the better choice for regulated businesses, the issuer is NYSE-listed (CRCL, IPO June 2024), publishes monthly attested reserves with Big-4 auditor, and has obtained EU MiCA EMT authorization. USDT has larger global circulation and deeper liquidity on many emerging-market exchanges, but the issuer has historically been less transparent about reserves and faced enforcement actions (NYAG settlement 2021 over reserve disclosures). For US-regulated B2B, USDC is the default. For emerging-market B2B (especially Latin America, Africa, Southeast Asia retail flows), USDT remains widely used due to liquidity, but US businesses should weight regulatory comfort.
What is custody and why is segregation of customer funds critical?
Custody refers to how a service provider holds and protects customer crypto assets. The 2022 FTX collapse defined this issue, FTX commingled customer funds with sister-firm Alameda Research trading positions, and when Alameda became insolvent, customer funds vanished. The lesson for B2B buyers: (1) verify the vendor practices strict segregation of customer funds from operating funds, (2) prefer MPC (Multi-Party Computation) or hardware-backed custody over single-key custody, (3) verify the vendor provides regular reserve attestations or proof-of-reserves, and (4) understand the legal status of customer assets in vendor insolvency. Fireblocks (MPC, strict segregation), Circle (NYSE-listed, monthly attestations), and Anchorage (federally chartered crypto bank, not in this ranking) are the cleanest custody postures. Bridge, BVNK, and Triple-A operate licensed custody with segregation but at smaller scale.
What is MPC and why does it matter for institutional custody?
MPC (Multi-Party Computation) is a cryptographic technique that splits a single private key into multiple shares held by separate parties, with the property that a transaction requires a threshold of parties to cooperate to sign. The practical implication: no single party (including the vendor) has full control over the wallet, and a breach of any single key share does not compromise the wallet. Fireblocks pioneered institutional MPC custody and remains the leader; competitors (BitGo, Anchorage, Copper) also offer MPC. For B2B buyers holding meaningful crypto on balance sheet, MPC custody is the modern minimum standard, single-key or single-signer custody is not acceptable post-FTX.
How much should a business budget for crypto and stablecoin payment infrastructure?
For SMB invoicing in stablecoins (Sphere): $1,000 to $15,000 annually. For SMB cross-border payouts (Conduit, BVNK Starter): $15,000 to $40,000 annually. For mid-market stablecoin rails (Bridge, BVNK, Conduit Growth): $40,000 to $120,000 annually. For Circle Mint USDC issuer-direct (mid-market): $8,000 to $60,000 annually depending on volume. For institutional custody (Fireblocks): $30,000 to $300,000+ annually. For developer-first programmable payments (Halliday): usage-based, $5,000 to $60,000 annually. Add network gas fees (variable, especially on Ethereum mainnet), FX spreads on conversion, and implementation services on top of subscription.
Can I evaluate crypto payment infrastructure via free trial or sandbox?
Most vendors in this ranking provide sandbox API access for developer testing without commitment: Bridge (Stripe sandbox), BVNK, Conduit, Circle Mint, Sphere (plus 30-day free trial), Halliday (free developer tier permanent), Mesh (free developer tier permanent), Triple-A. Fireblocks requires demo and sandbox provisioning by sales. MoonPay has consumer-side access plus B2B sandbox. We recommend running 50 to 200 small transactions through any candidate platform end-to-end (mint, transfer, receive, off-ramp) before signing an annual contract, the operational reality of stablecoin payments (gas fees, settlement times, reconciliation, AML alerts) is best understood through real flow not vendor demo.

Final word

Looking at a different market? See the global Crypto and Stablecoin Payments (B2B) Software ranking, or pick another country at the top of this page.

Last updated 2026-05-19. Local pricing reverified quarterly. Found something inaccurate? Tell us.