Skip to content
Z Zendikt
O
Audit Software · Rank #7 of 10

Onspring review and pricing

No-code GRC + audit platform with strong customization without enterprise-implementation overhead.

By Onspring Technologies · Founded 2010 · Overland Park, KS · private

Onspring launched 2010 (founder Chris Burton ex-Sprint) and positioned distinctively in the audit-and-GRC category: a no-code workflow platform supporting audit + ERM + vendor risk + business continuity through customer-built or Onspring-shipped applications. Wins on platform flexibility, mid-market-friendly implementation timelines, and strong customer reputation (4.7+ G2 average). Loses on smaller installed base than AuditBoard, integration breadth, and lower brand mindshare in audit procurement defaults.

Visit Onspring Vendor pricing Compare to Caseware IDEA
Best for

Mid-market and upper-mid-market wanting no-code workflow customization for audit + GRC.

Worst for

Buyers wanting out-of-box audit content (AuditBoard fit better); pure data-analytics buyers (MindBridge fit better).

Vendor Trust Score

Is Onspring a trustworthy vendor?

8.3/10
High trust
Pricing transparency
Published rates; no hidden fees
7.4
Contract fairness
Reasonable terms; no auto-renew traps
8.4
Incident response
How they handle outages and breaches
8.4
Post-acquisition behavior
Customer treatment after M&A or PE
8.8
Executive stability
Leadership churn over 24 months
8.6
Roadmap honesty
Public commitments held
8.4
Trust signal log
  • 2020-05-15
    Founder-led growth with no PE-control or external-acquisition events; consistent strategy through 2026
  • 2024-10-12
    Customer-reputation top-quartile across G2, Capterra, Gartner Peer Insights
  • 2025-08-20
    AI-Assist module launched for control-testing and audit-evidence drafting
Vendor Trust is scored independently of product quality. A great product from an unfair vendor still earns a low trust score.
Review Intelligence

What 320 reviews actually say

Synthesized from G2, Capterra, Reddit, Trustpilot. Patterns >15% prevalence shown.

Last synthesized
2026-04-29

Praise patterns

  • No-code workflow platform flexibility for audit + GRC
    87% →
  • Strong customer reputation and customer-support quality
    78% →
  • Platform consolidates 3-5 separate point-tools
    64% ↑

Complaint patterns

  • Out-of-box audit content thinner than peers
    47% →
  • Brand mindshare lower in audit procurement defaults
    41% ↓
  • Integration breadth thinner than AuditBoard and Workiva
    38% →
Sentiment trend (6 months)
88/100 +2 pts
12
01
02
03
04
05
Patterns are extracted from review corpus and human-verified. We surface trends, not anecdotes.
Verified Pricing

What buyers actually pay

64 anonymized deal disclosures · last updated 2026-05-01

Contribute your deal price
Company size Median annual
300-1500 employees $62,000
1500-5000 employees $145,000
Verified pricing is crowdsourced from buyers under anonymity guarantees. Vendor-listed prices are validated against actual deals quarterly.
Compliance & Security

Auto-verified certifications

Verified 2026-05-01
SOC 2 Type II
ISO 27001
HIPAA
GDPR
CCPA
PCI DSS
◐ FedRAMP In-Process

Editorial: Strengths

  • No-code workflow platform supports audit + ERM + vendor risk + business continuity
  • Strong customer reputation: 4.7+ G2 average, top-quartile NPS in mid-market
  • Mid-market-friendly implementation timelines (8-16 weeks typical)
  • Platform-level flexibility lets customers consolidate 3-5 separate point-tools
  • Risk register with quantitative scoring + risk-treatment lifecycle
  • Mature workpaper management with versioning + sign-off

Editorial: Weaknesses

  • Smaller installed base than AuditBoard; brand mindshare lower in audit procurement defaults
  • Integration breadth thinner than AuditBoard and Workiva
  • Out-of-box audit content thinner than peers (no-code-platform-first approach)
  • Pricing tied to platform tier + per-application charges; complex to budget
  • Sales footprint smaller than peers; field marketing lighter

Key features & integrations

  • +No-code workflow engine for audit + ERM + vendor risk + business continuity
  • +Pre-built applications: internal audit, SOX, ERM, vendor risk, business continuity
  • +Risk register with quantitative scoring
  • +Workpaper management with versioning + sign-off
  • +Multi-entity support for subsidiaries + business units
  • +Custom application builder (no-code visual workflow)
  • +Mature reporting and dashboards
  • +Workflow-driven control testing
90+ integrations
SAPOracleNetSuiteWorkdayMicrosoft 365ServiceNowJiraSalesforceTableau
Geography supported
North America · Europe · Asia-Pacific
Best fit
300-5,000+ employees · Mid-market with workflow customization
Editorial deep-dive

Read our full ranking of Audit Software

Onspring ranks #7 in our editorial review of 10 audit software platforms. The deep-dive covers methodology, comparison tables, decision matrix, migration scoring, and FAQs.

Read the full ranking

Closest alternatives in Audit Software

#6
Caseware IDEA
Long-standing data-analytics platform for transaction-population testing.
★ 4.3 opaque
#8
Pentana Audit
Wolters Kluwer-owned internal-audit platform with TeamMate+ ecosystem integration.
★ 4.0 opaque
#5
TeamMate+
Wolters Kluwer-owned external-audit-firm workflow platform with deep workpaper-management heritage.
★ 4.2 opaque
Help the next buyer

Contribute your verified deal price

Pricing in B2B software is opaque because vendors want it that way. Verified buyer prices fix that, anonymously. Share what you actually paid for Onspring; we’ll add it to the verified pricing dataset on this page (with company size band only, no identifying details).

Submit anonymously