Skip to content
Z Zendikt
L
Legal Practice Management · Rank #8 of 10

Litify review and pricing

Salesforce-anchored law firm platform for plaintiff and PI firms.

By Litify, Inc. · Founded 2016 · New York, NY · private

Litify is the Salesforce-anchored law firm management platform, founded 2016 by Morgan and Morgan (one of the largest US plaintiff firms) and later spun out. The product is built natively on Salesforce, providing matter management, intake, time and billing, document management, and reporting with platform extensibility via Salesforce ecosystem. Strengths: native Salesforce architecture (deepest extensibility in legal category), strong fit for plaintiff, mass tort, and personal injury firms wanting platform flexibility, deep reporting via Salesforce reports and dashboards, mature intake automation for high-volume contingency firms. Best fit for plaintiff and personal injury firms (10-500 attorneys) wanting Salesforce-anchored extensibility. Trade-offs: requires Salesforce licenses on top of Litify (TCO higher), implementation complex (3-12 months), narrower fit outside plaintiff and PI vertical, and trust accounting depth below CosmoLex and Tabs3.

Visit Litify Vendor pricing Compare to ProLaw
Best for

Plaintiff, mass tort, and personal injury firms (10-500 attorneys) wanting Salesforce-anchored law firm platform with intake automation and reporting depth.

Worst for

Defense and corporate firms (Clio or ProLaw better), small firms not on Salesforce (Clio cleaner), or firms wanting deepest trust accounting (CosmoLex or Tabs3 better).

Vendor Trust Score

Is Litify a trustworthy vendor?

7.4/10
Mixed
Pricing transparency
Published rates; no hidden fees
5.5
Contract fairness
Reasonable terms; no auto-renew traps
7.5
Incident response
How they handle outages and breaches
8.0
Post-acquisition behavior
Customer treatment after M&A or PE
8.0
Executive stability
Leadership churn over 24 months
8.0
Roadmap honesty
Public commitments held
7.5
Trust signal log
  • 2024-09-22
    Salesforce-anchored architecture continues to attract plaintiff firms
  • 2025-02-22
    Mass tort case management features deepened
Vendor Trust is scored independently of product quality. A great product from an unfair vendor still earns a low trust score.
Review Intelligence

What 180 reviews actually say

Synthesized from G2, Capterra, Reddit, Trustpilot. Patterns >15% prevalence shown.

Last synthesized
2026-04-29

Praise patterns

  • Native Salesforce extensibility
    87% →
  • Strong fit for plaintiff and PI firms
    78% →
  • Mature intake automation
    71% →
  • Deep reporting via Salesforce
    64% →

Complaint patterns

  • Requires Salesforce licenses on top (TCO higher)
    47% →
  • Implementation complex 3-12 months
    41% →
  • Narrower fit outside plaintiff and PI
    38% →
  • Trust accounting depth below CosmoLex and Tabs3
    31% →
Sentiment trend (6 months)
79/100 +1 pts
12
01
02
03
04
05
Patterns are extracted from review corpus and human-verified. We surface trends, not anecdotes.
Verified Pricing

What buyers actually pay

87 anonymized deal disclosures · last updated 2026-05-01

Contribute your deal price
Company size Median annual
10-50 attorneys $96,000
50-500 attorneys $480,000
Verified pricing is crowdsourced from buyers under anonymity guarantees. Vendor-listed prices are validated against actual deals quarterly.
Compliance & Security

Auto-verified certifications

Verified 2026-05-01
SOC 2 Type II
ISO 27001
HIPAA
GDPR
CCPA
PCI DSS
FedRAMP

Editorial: Strengths

  • Native Salesforce architecture (deepest extensibility in legal)
  • Strong fit for plaintiff, mass tort, and personal injury firms
  • Mature intake automation for high-volume contingency
  • Deep reporting via Salesforce dashboards
  • Platform flexibility for custom workflows
  • Morgan and Morgan-rooted understanding of plaintiff workflows

Editorial: Weaknesses

  • Requires Salesforce licenses on top of Litify (TCO higher)
  • Implementation complex (3-12 months)
  • Narrower fit outside plaintiff and PI vertical
  • Trust accounting depth below CosmoLex and Tabs3
  • UX feels Salesforce-like, not legal-native

Key features & integrations

  • +Matter management on Salesforce
  • +Intake automation
  • +Time and billing
  • +Document management
  • +Trust accounting
  • +Salesforce reporting and dashboards
  • +Custom workflow extensibility
  • +Mass tort case management
200+ integrations
Salesforce (native)DocuSignNetDocumentsMicrosoft 365OutlookStripeTwilio
Geography supported
US, Canada
Best fit
10-500 attorneys employees · Plaintiff, mass tort, personal injury firms
Editorial deep-dive

Read our full ranking of Legal Practice Management

Litify ranks #8 in our editorial review of 10 legal practice management platforms. The deep-dive covers methodology, comparison tables, decision matrix, migration scoring, and FAQs.

Read the full ranking

Closest alternatives in Legal Practice Management

#7
ProLaw
Enterprise law firm management with Thomson Reuters and Westlaw integration.
★ 4.0 opaque
#9
AbacusLaw / CARET Legal
PE-rebranded 2024 from AbacusNext to CARET Legal; hybrid SaaS and on-prem.
★ 3.9 partial
#6
Rocket Matter
Cloud legal practice management under ProfitSolv consolidation.
★ 4.3 public
Help the next buyer

Contribute your verified deal price

Pricing in B2B software is opaque because vendors want it that way. Verified buyer prices fix that, anonymously. Share what you actually paid for Litify; we’ll add it to the verified pricing dataset on this page (with company size band only, no identifying details).

Submit anonymously