EU public sector and sovereignty-minded buyers needing federated, decentralized, end-to-end encryptable team chat on the open Matrix protocol. Particularly defensible for French and German government, EU defense contractors, and any organization that genuinely needs cross-organization federated messaging.
Mainstream SaaS and tech companies (Slack better), Microsoft 365 shops (Teams is bundled), buyers who do not actually need federation (most do not), organizations without ops investment for self-hosted Matrix homeserver, or buyers prioritizing day-to-day messaging UX.
Is Element a trustworthy vendor?
- 2014-08-12Matrix protocol founded by Matthew Hodgson and Amandine Le PapeOpen Matrix protocol founded 2014 alongside New Vector (now Element); positioned as open federated alternative to proprietary chat networks.
- 2019-04-30French government adopted Element for Tchap secure messengerFrench government deployed Element-based Tchap for secure inter-ministerial messaging; defensible reference for EU public-sector procurement.
- 2023-05-15German Bundeswehr publicly disclosed as Element customerGerman federal armed forces (Bundeswehr) publicly disclosed as Element customer; reinforces sovereignty and defense positioning.
What 240 reviews actually say
Synthesized from G2, Capterra, Reddit, Trustpilot. Patterns >15% prevalence shown.
Praise patterns
- Open Matrix protocol with genuine federation87% →
- End-to-end encryption by default for private rooms78% →
- Fully self-hosted on-prem option for sovereignty buyers71% →
- Defensible reference base in EU public sector and defense64% →
Complaint patterns
- Federation adds operational complexity marketing understates51% →
- Day-to-day UX less polished than Slack or Teams47% →
- App integration directory narrow; Matrix bridges need setup41% →
- Open-protocol value accrues to buyers who actually need federation38% →
What buyers actually pay
160 anonymized deal disclosures · last updated 2026-05-01
| Company size | Median annual |
|---|---|
| 20 to 100 users (Element Business) | $9,600 |
| 100 to 1,000 users (Element Server Suite) | $78,000 |
| 1,000+ users (Element Server Suite) | $360,000 |
Auto-verified certifications
Editorial: Strengths
- Open Matrix protocol with genuine federation across organizations
- End-to-end encryption by default for private rooms
- Fully self-hosted on-prem deployment option
- Defensible for EU public-sector and sovereignty buyers
- French government (Tchap) and German Bundeswehr publicly disclosed
- Open-source clients and servers (Apache 2.0)
- Cross-organization messaging via Matrix federation
Editorial: Weaknesses
- Federation adds operational complexity marketing understates
- Day-to-day UX materially less polished than Slack or Teams
- App integration directory narrow; Matrix bridges require setup
- Smaller vendor footprint; procurement pushback at non-EU enterprises
- Open-protocol value mostly accrues to buyers who actually need federation
- Mobile app polish behind Slack and Teams
- Self-hosting requires real ops investment for Matrix homeserver
Key features & integrations
- +Open Matrix protocol with federation across organizations
- +End-to-end encryption by default for private rooms
- +Self-hosted Matrix homeserver (Synapse, Dendrite)
- +Matrix bridges to Slack, Teams, IRC, XMPP, others
- +Spaces (channels) and threads
- +SAML SSO at Element Business and Element Server Suite
- +Voice and video calling (native plus Jitsi bridge)
- +Mobile apps for iOS and Android
- +REST API and Matrix Client-Server API
- +Compliance exports at Element Server Suite
Read our full ranking of Team Chat Software
Element ranks #10 in our editorial review of 10 team chat software platforms. The deep-dive covers methodology, comparison tables, decision matrix, migration scoring, and FAQs.
Read the full rankingClosest alternatives in Team Chat Software
Contribute your verified deal price
Pricing in B2B software is opaque because vendors want it that way. Verified buyer prices fix that, anonymously. Share what you actually paid for Element; we’ll add it to the verified pricing dataset on this page (with company size band only, no identifying details).
Submit anonymously