Skip to content
Z Zendikt
S
GRC / Compliance Automation · Rank #3 of 10

Secureframe review and pricing

Strong #3 with named-CSM differentiation and growing AI-governance bench.

By Secureframe · Founded 2020 · San Francisco, CA · private

Secureframe launched 2020 (founder Shrav Mehta) and closed a $56M Series B November 2022. Competitive with Vanta and Drata on framework coverage and control automation; the differentiation is named-CSM service depth as a built-in part of every tier above Starter. Wins on customer satisfaction in 50-300 employee mid-market (top-quartile G2 CSAT) but loses on funding overhang versus Drata and Vanta (no Series C disclosed since November 2022). Comply AI launched November 2024 cuts time-to-evidence by 40-60%.

Visit Secureframe Vendor pricing Compare to Drata
Best for

Mid-market (100-500 employees) wanting named-CSM service depth as a primary differentiator.

Worst for

Companies wanting fully self-serve; the model is heavier on guided implementation.

Vendor Trust Score

Is Secureframe a trustworthy vendor?

8.0/10
High trust
Pricing transparency
Published rates; no hidden fees
7.4
Contract fairness
Reasonable terms; no auto-renew traps
7.9
Incident response
How they handle outages and breaches
8.1
Post-acquisition behavior
Customer treatment after M&A or PE
8.5
Executive stability
Leadership churn over 24 months
8.2
Roadmap honesty
Public commitments held
8.1
Trust signal log
  • 2022-11-10
    Series B close of $56M led by Accel
  • 2024-11-15
    Comply AI launched; 40-60% time-to-evidence reduction in early disclosures
  • 2025-06-12
    No Series C disclosed; runway questions emerged with Vanta + Drata more capitalized
  • 2026-03-05
    Trust Center product launched closing gap with Vanta and Drata
Vendor Trust is scored independently of product quality. A great product from an unfair vendor still earns a low trust score.
Review Intelligence

What 940 reviews actually say

Synthesized from G2, Capterra, Reddit, Trustpilot. Patterns >15% prevalence shown.

Last synthesized
2026-04-29

Praise patterns

  • Named-CSM service quality is the standout strength
    87% →
  • Framework coverage parity with Vanta and Drata
    71% →
  • Comply AI agent meaningfully reduces evidence-collection time
    64% ↑

Complaint patterns

  • Implementation feels guided not self-serve
    47% →
  • Integration breadth thinner than Vanta
    41% →
  • Capital-base concern shows up in renewal conversations
    38% ↑
Sentiment trend (6 months)
86/100 +2 pts
12
01
02
03
04
05
Patterns are extracted from review corpus and human-verified. We surface trends, not anecdotes.
Verified Pricing

What buyers actually pay

169 anonymized deal disclosures · last updated 2026-05-01

Contribute your deal price
Company size Median annual
25-75 employees $25,000
75-300 employees $54,000
300-1000 employees $132,000
Verified pricing is crowdsourced from buyers under anonymity guarantees. Vendor-listed prices are validated against actual deals quarterly.
Compliance & Security

Auto-verified certifications

Verified 2026-05-01
SOC 2 Type II
ISO 27001
HIPAA
GDPR
CCPA
PCI DSS
FedRAMP

Editorial: Strengths

  • Named CSM included on every tier above Starter (Vanta and Drata gate this to Enterprise)
  • Top-quartile customer-satisfaction scores in 50-300 employee mid-market on G2 and Gartner Peer Insights
  • Comply AI in-product agent reduces time-to-evidence-collection by 40-60%
  • Framework coverage parity with Vanta and Drata across major frameworks
  • Strong audit-portal experience with auditor self-serve access
  • Risk register with quantitative scoring included in mid-tier

Editorial: Weaknesses

  • Capital-base concern: no Series C since November 2022 versus Vanta $353M and Drata $328M total
  • Integration breadth thinner than Vanta (130+ vs 350+)
  • Custom framework support requires Enterprise tier and implementation services
  • Trust Center product launched later than Vanta and Drata (March 2026)
  • Field marketing focuses heavily on G2-comparison content; sales motion competitive-positioning-heavy
  • Limited muscle in regulated-industry verticals (financial services, healthcare provider, federal contractor)

Key features & integrations

  • +130+ integrations with auto-evidence collection
  • +Comply AI in-product agent for control-evidence assistance
  • +Named CSM included from Growth tier upward
  • +Pre-built frameworks: SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, PCI DSS 4.0, GDPR, NIST CSF, NIST 800-53, CMMC L1-2
  • +Vendor risk management with auto-pulled SOC 2
  • +Risk register with quantitative + qualitative scoring
  • +Audit-ready evidence packaging with auditor portal
  • +Multi-framework crosswalks
130+ integrations
AWSAzureGCPOktaRipplingBambooHRJiraGitHubCrowdStrike
Geography supported
North America · Europe · Asia-Pacific
Best fit
50-1,000 employees · Mid-market SaaS, named-CSM preference
Editorial deep-dive

Read our full ranking of GRC / Compliance Automation

Secureframe ranks #3 in our editorial review of 10 grc / compliance automation platforms. The deep-dive covers methodology, comparison tables, decision matrix, migration scoring, and FAQs.

Read the full ranking

Closest alternatives in GRC / Compliance Automation

#2
Drata
Faster-growing #2 with stronger evidence-collection automation and cleaner pricing posture.
★ 4.8 partial
#4
Sprinto
India-headquartered #4 with strong APAC pricing and increasingly competitive US presence.
★ 4.8 partial
#1
Vanta
Category-defining startup-to-mid-market compliance automation with deepest market mindshare.
★ 4.6 partial
Help the next buyer

Contribute your verified deal price

Pricing in B2B software is opaque because vendors want it that way. Verified buyer prices fix that, anonymously. Share what you actually paid for Secureframe; we’ll add it to the verified pricing dataset on this page (with company size band only, no identifying details).

Submit anonymously