Skip to content
Z Zendikt
D
GRC / Compliance Automation · Rank #2 of 10

Drata review and pricing

Faster-growing #2 with stronger evidence-collection automation and cleaner pricing posture.

By Drata · Founded 2020 · San Diego, CA · private

Drata launched 2020 (founders Adam Markowitz, Daniel Marashlian, Troy Markowitz) and closed a $200M Series C March 2023 at $2B post-money, putting it credibly close to Vanta in capital base. Wins on evidence-automation depth (Drata pioneered the auto-pull-from-source approach Vanta later matched), control test breadth (1000+ pre-built tests), and customer-friendlier pricing posture (transparent tier structure, fewer overage gotchas). Lags Vanta on brand mindshare, Trust Center polish, and auditor-network footprint. The 2025 AI-control-monitoring module is genuine.

Visit Drata Vendor pricing Compare to Vanta
Best for

Mid-market SaaS (100-1000 employees) wanting tighter automation and a less aggressive sales motion than Vanta.

Worst for

Pre-seed startups wanting fully zero-touch product (Drata requires more configuration than Vanta on day one).

Vendor Trust Score

Is Drata a trustworthy vendor?

8.4/10
High trust
Pricing transparency
Published rates; no hidden fees
7.6
Contract fairness
Reasonable terms; no auto-renew traps
8.1
Incident response
How they handle outages and breaches
8.6
Post-acquisition behavior
Customer treatment after M&A or PE
9.0
Executive stability
Leadership churn over 24 months
8.8
Roadmap honesty
Public commitments held
8.4
Trust signal log
  • 2023-03-15
    Series C close of $200M at $2B post-money led by ICONIQ
  • 2024-09-10
    Trust Center product launched closing Vanta-mindshare gap
  • 2025-04-08
    AI-control-monitoring module launched with NIST AI RMF + ISO 42001 testing
  • 2026-02-20
    FedRAMP Moderate in-process confirmed; H2 2026 authorization target
Vendor Trust is scored independently of product quality. A great product from an unfair vendor still earns a low trust score.
Review Intelligence

What 1,620 reviews actually say

Synthesized from G2, Capterra, Reddit, Trustpilot. Patterns >15% prevalence shown.

Last synthesized
2026-04-29

Praise patterns

  • Evidence-automation depth and control-test breadth exceeds Vanta
    87% ↑
  • Pricing posture more predictable than Vanta
    78% ↑
  • Customer support responsive and technically deep
    71% →
  • AI risk module is genuinely differentiating
    47% ↑

Complaint patterns

  • Implementation requires more upfront configuration than Vanta
    51% →
  • Brand mindshare gap versus Vanta among auditors persists
    41% ↓
Sentiment trend (6 months)
88/100 +2 pts
12
01
02
03
04
05
Patterns are extracted from review corpus and human-verified. We surface trends, not anecdotes.
Verified Pricing

What buyers actually pay

216 anonymized deal disclosures · last updated 2026-05-01

Contribute your deal price
Company size Median annual
25-75 employees $28,000
75-300 employees $62,000
300-1500 employees $156,000
Verified pricing is crowdsourced from buyers under anonymity guarantees. Vendor-listed prices are validated against actual deals quarterly.
Compliance & Security

Auto-verified certifications

Verified 2026-05-01
SOC 2 Type II
ISO 27001
HIPAA
GDPR
CCPA
PCI DSS
◐ FedRAMP In-Process

Editorial: Strengths

  • 1000+ pre-built control tests with auto-evidence collection across major frameworks
  • Cleaner pricing posture than Vanta: predictable tier-based pricing with fewer band-overage surprises
  • Strong continuous-monitoring depth with real-time control-failure detection
  • AI-control-monitoring module (NIST AI RMF + ISO 42001) launched April 2025
  • Customer-trust-center product launched September 2024
  • Third-party-risk module with auto-pulled SOC 2 + custom questionnaires + risk scoring

Editorial: Weaknesses

  • Brand mindshare gap versus Vanta in auditor recommendations and startup procurement defaults
  • Custom framework support requires implementation services (4-12 week project)
  • Pricing still call-for-quote at top tier
  • Field marketing leans heavily on Vanta-comparison content (sales motion competitive-heavy)
  • Customer base skews tech-SaaS; thinner muscle in healthcare-provider or financial-services verticals
  • Implementation requires more upfront configuration than Vanta

Key features & integrations

  • +1000+ pre-built control tests with auto-evidence collection
  • +Continuous control monitoring with real-time failure detection
  • +AI-control-monitoring module (NIST AI RMF + ISO 42001)
  • +Trust Center (customer-facing public security page)
  • +Vendor risk management with auto-pulled SOC 2
  • +Risk register with quantitative + qualitative scoring
  • +Audit-ready evidence packaging with auditor-portal access
  • +Multi-framework crosswalks
180+ integrations
AWSAzureGCPOktaRipplingJiraGitHubCrowdStrike
Geography supported
North America · Europe · Asia-Pacific
Best fit
50-1,500 employees · Mid-market SaaS
Editorial deep-dive

Read our full ranking of GRC / Compliance Automation

Drata ranks #2 in our editorial review of 10 grc / compliance automation platforms. The deep-dive covers methodology, comparison tables, decision matrix, migration scoring, and FAQs.

Read the full ranking

Closest alternatives in GRC / Compliance Automation

#1
Vanta
Category-defining startup-to-mid-market compliance automation with deepest market mindshare.
★ 4.6 partial
#3
Secureframe
Strong #3 with named-CSM differentiation and growing AI-governance bench.
★ 4.7 partial
#4
Sprinto
India-headquartered #4 with strong APAC pricing and increasingly competitive US presence.
★ 4.8 partial
Help the next buyer

Contribute your verified deal price

Pricing in B2B software is opaque because vendors want it that way. Verified buyer prices fix that, anonymously. Share what you actually paid for Drata; we’ll add it to the verified pricing dataset on this page (with company size band only, no identifying details).

Submit anonymously