Mid-market and upper-mid-market (300-2500 employees) running multiple frameworks plus active audit-and-assessment workflows.
Pre-Series-A startups looking for fastest-time-to-SOC-2 (Hyperproof targets companies running 5+ frameworks).
Is Hyperproof a trustworthy vendor?
- 2022-11-08Series B close of $40M led by Riverwood Capital
- 2024-06-10FedRAMP Moderate authorization achieved; broadens federal addressable market
- 2025-03-12NIST AI RMF + ISO 42001 + EU AI Act framework coverage integrated with crosswalk
- 2026-02-15Series C reportedly in fundraising process; capital-runway watchpoint
What 580 reviews actually say
Synthesized from G2, Capterra, Reddit, Trustpilot. Patterns >15% prevalence shown.
Praise patterns
- Audit-workflow depth genuinely exceeds Vanta + Drata + Secureframe87% →
- Multi-framework crosswalk is the standout feature78% →
- Customer support and CSM relationship quality is best-in-class71% →
- Risk register and risk-management depth above peers64% ↑
Complaint patterns
- Pricing transparency lower than peers47% →
- Time-to-first-SOC-2 slower than Vanta + Drata for new entrants41% →
What buyers actually pay
75 anonymized deal disclosures · last updated 2026-05-01
| Company size | Median annual |
|---|---|
| 300-1500 employees | $96,000 |
| 1500-5000 employees | $240,000 |
Auto-verified certifications
Editorial: Strengths
- Deepest audit workflow in startup-modern-GRC layer: observation tracking, audit-readiness scoring, auditor portal
- Cleanest customer reputation in category: 4.7+ Gartner Peer Insights, 4-6 year average tenure
- Multi-framework crosswalk depth: control-test answers cascade to 12+ frameworks simultaneously
- Risk register depth: quantitative scoring, Monte Carlo simulation, risk-treatment lifecycle
- Third-party / vendor risk management with deep questionnaire library + risk scoring
- AI-risk framework coverage (NIST AI RMF + ISO 42001 + EU AI Act) integrated with crosswalk
Editorial: Weaknesses
- Capital base smaller than Vanta + Drata (Series B Nov 2022; Series C overdue)
- Slower time-to-first-SOC-2 than Vanta and Drata (targets multi-framework customers)
- Pricing transparency lower at entry tier; most deals quote-driven
- Integration breadth thinner than Vanta and Drata (110+ vs 350+ and 180+)
- Brand mindshare in startup procurement defaults lower than Vanta + Drata
- Enterprise sales motion stretches implementation timelines to 8-16 weeks
Key features & integrations
- +Audit-readiness workflow with observation tracking + scoring
- +Multi-framework crosswalk with 12+ frameworks (control answers cascade)
- +Risk register with quantitative scoring, Monte Carlo simulation
- +Third-party / vendor risk with deep questionnaire library
- +AI-risk framework coverage (NIST AI RMF + ISO 42001 + EU AI Act)
- +Evidence automation with auto-pull from 110+ integrations
- +Auditor-portal experience with self-serve access
- +Multi-entity support for subsidiaries + joint ventures
Read our full ranking of GRC / Compliance Automation
Hyperproof ranks #5 in our editorial review of 10 grc / compliance automation platforms. The deep-dive covers methodology, comparison tables, decision matrix, migration scoring, and FAQs.
Read the full rankingClosest alternatives in GRC / Compliance Automation
Contribute your verified deal price
Pricing in B2B software is opaque because vendors want it that way. Verified buyer prices fix that, anonymously. Share what you actually paid for Hyperproof; we’ll add it to the verified pricing dataset on this page (with company size band only, no identifying details).
Submit anonymously