Skip to content
Z Zendikt
United States edition · 10 products ranked · Verified 2026-05-17

Top 10 SIEM Software in the United States for 2026

Independent ranking of SIEM platforms for US buyers: FedRAMP coverage, NIST CSF and SEC disclosure rule fit, CISA guidance.

United States verdict (TL;DR)

Verified 2026-05-17

Splunk Enterprise Security and Microsoft Sentinel split the US enterprise SIEM market: Splunk for mature federal and commercial SOCs running custom detection engineering via SPL; Sentinel for the large swath of US enterprise running Microsoft 365 + Azure with Defender XDR already deployed. Google SecOps is growing fast post-Mandiant acquisition and the GovCloud FedRAMP authorization solidifies its federal civilian pipeline. Federal civilian agencies increasingly land on Sentinel for Government or Google SecOps GovCloud. Defense and intelligence community workloads require FedRAMP High or IL4/IL5 authorization, which currently routes buyers to Splunk GovCloud or Sentinel for Government. The 2023 SEC cyber incident disclosure rule (four-day reporting for material incidents) has elevated board-level urgency for SIEM with pre-built SEC-disclosure workflow, where Splunk ES and Sentinel both have relevant playbooks.

Picks for United States

  • Federal civilian agencies (FedRAMP Moderate/High): microsoft-sentinel Sentinel for Government is FedRAMP High authorized. Deep Microsoft 365 Government integration. Default choice for civilian agencies already on M365 GCC High.
  • Defense and intelligence community (IL4/IL5): splunk-es Splunk GovCloud is FedRAMP High authorized and runs inside IL4/IL5 environments. Deepest detection engineering for defense SOC teams.
  • Fortune 500 mature commercial SOC: splunk-es Dominant US commercial enterprise SIEM. SPL-driven detection engineering. 500+ certified Splunk engineers in the US labor market.
  • Microsoft 365 + Azure enterprise: microsoft-sentinel Native Defender XDR integration. Free ingestion tiers for Microsoft sources cut TCO by 40-60% vs Splunk for M365-heavy environments.
  • Google Cloud-anchored enterprise: google-secops Unlimited ingestion at per-employee pricing. Mandiant threat intel native. Growing fast in post-Mandiant Google security ecosystem.
  • Mid-market SOC wanting XDR convergence: rapid7-insightidr Right call for US mid-market (200-2,000 employees). Native InsightVM vulnerability management integration. Predictable pricing.
  • Insider threat and UEBA-led SOC: exabeam Built around UEBA from day one. Strong for US financial services and healthcare SOCs focused on insider threat.
  • MSSP and hyper-scale data volume: devo Real-time analytics at petabyte scale. Preferred by US MSSPs managing multi-tenant environments.
Market context

How the siem software market looks in United States

The US is the largest and most mature SIEM market globally, home to the headquarters of every major SIEM vendor except Logpoint (Danish) and Sekoia.io (French). The market split in 2026 runs along two axes: cloud provider anchor and security maturity.

For cloud-provider-anchored buyers, the outcome is nearly deterministic: Microsoft 365 + Azure shops run Sentinel; Google Cloud shops run Google SecOps (Chronicle); AWS-primary shops typically choose Splunk Cloud (via AWS Marketplace) or occasionally Sumo Logic SIEM. Pure multi-cloud environments trend toward Splunk for its cloud-agnostic SPL.

Federal buying is shaped by FedRAMP authorization. As of 2026, Splunk GovCloud (FedRAMP High), Microsoft Sentinel for Government (FedRAMP High), and Google SecOps GovCloud (FedRAMP Moderate, High in process) are the three viable federal SIEM platforms. CISA's 2024 guidance on government SIEM and EDR integration has further reinforced Sentinel for civilian agencies (given the CISA and NSA joint guidance on Microsoft security defaults). Defense sector follows DOD IL requirements; IL4/IL5 workloads narrow the field to Splunk GovCloud and Sentinel for Government.

The 2023 SEC cyber incident disclosure rule requires public companies to disclose material cybersecurity incidents within four business days and provide annual disclosure of cybersecurity risk management. Splunk ES and Sentinel both ship pre-built playbooks for SEC Rule 10K/8K workflows. This has accelerated SIEM adoption among SEC-reporting companies that previously ran without a formal SIEM.

State-level breach notification laws (50+ states) vary in 30-90 day notification windows; enterprise buyers typically use SIEM ticketing integration (ServiceNow, Jira) to automate notification workflows. Splunk, Sentinel, and QRadar all have ServiceNow integrations. NIST CSF 2.0 (released 2024) is the de facto framework for US SIEM RFP evaluation; most enterprise buyers map SIEM detection rules to NIST CSF Detect and Respond functions.

Compliance & local rules

FedRAMP authorization is table-stakes for federal buyers: Splunk GovCloud and Microsoft Sentinel for Government both carry FedRAMP High; Google SecOps GovCloud is FedRAMP Moderate authorized as of 2026. NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 control mapping is required for federal SIEM deployments; Splunk, Sentinel, and Google SecOps all publish NIST 800-53 content packs. HIPAA-covered entities need SIEM with PHI-aware log masking and BAA availability; Splunk, Sentinel, Sumo Logic, and Rapid7 InsightIDR provide BAAs. PCI DSS 4.0 (effective 2025) tightens log-integrity and real-time alert requirements; Splunk and QRadar have the deepest PCI compliance content packs. SEC Rule 10K/8K (cybersecurity incident disclosure) playbooks available in Splunk ES and Sentinel. CCPA and state privacy laws generally do not impose SIEM-specific requirements but affect log retention and employee data handling.

At a glance

Quick comparison, ranked for United States

Product Best for Starts at 10-emp/mo* Pricing G2 Geo
1 Splunk Enterprise Security
Mature enterprise SOC teams
Quote - 4.3 Global
2 Microsoft Sentinel
Microsoft-anchored enterprise
$0 $0 4.4 Global; Azure regions
3 Google SecOps (Chronicle)
Google Cloud-anchored mid-market and enterprise
$0 + $6/emp $60 4.5 Global
4 Exabeam Fusion SIEM
Mid-market and enterprise SOC
Quote - 4.3 Global
5 Securonix
Mid-market and enterprise SOC
Quote - 4.4 Global
6 IBM QRadar
Traditional enterprise; IBM-anchored
Quote - 4.0 Global
7 Sumo Logic Cloud SIEM
Logs-led mid-market and enterprise
Quote - 4.3 Global
8 Rapid7 InsightIDR
Mid-market SOC teams
Quote - 4.4 Global
9 Devo
MSSPs and high-data-volume enterprises
Quote - 4.5 Global
10 LogRhythm
Traditional on-prem enterprise SOC
Quote - 4.0 Global

*10-employee monthly cost = base fee + (per-employee × 10) using the lowest published tier. For opaque-pricing vendors, no value is shown.

Verified local pricing

What buyers in United States actually pay

Median annual deal size by employee band, in USD. Crowdsourced from anonymized buyer disclosures.

Product Employee band Median annual (USD) Sample Notes
Splunk Enterprise Security 500-2,000 employees $360,000 56 Ingestion-based Splunk Cloud; USD
Splunk Enterprise Security 2,000-10,000 employees $1,200,000 41 Fortune 1000 typical; multi-year
Microsoft Sentinel 500-2,000 employees (M365) $96,000 87 Pay-as-you-go; Microsoft data free
Microsoft Sentinel 2,000-10,000 employees (M365) $360,000 64 Commitment tier; full enterprise
Google SecOps (Chronicle) 1,000-5,000 employees $240,000 34 Per-employee pricing; unlimited ingestion
Rapid7 InsightIDR 200-2,000 employees $84,000 61 Mid-market; bundled with InsightVM
IBM QRadar 5,000+ employees $480,000 28 QRadar SIEM on-prem or SaaS enterprise
Local challengers

United States-built or United States-strong vendors worth knowing

Not yet ranked in our global top 10, but credible options for United States buyers and worth a shortlist.

Palantir (Gotham/Foundry for security)

Visit ↗

Not a SIEM but used alongside Splunk in classified federal and defense environments for threat intelligence fusion and mission-critical analytics. Widespread in intelligence community.

Elastic SIEM (Elastic Security)

Visit ↗

Open-source-heritage SIEM built on Elasticsearch. Strong in US cloud-native DevSecOps shops wanting open detection rules (Elastic Common Schema). Free tier attractive for startups.

Hunters (SOC Platform)

Visit ↗

Tel Aviv-founded but US-headquartered (Boston). Positioned as Splunk alternative for modern cloud-native SOCs. Traction in US mid-enterprise 2024-2026.

The United States ranking

All 10, ranked for United States

Same intelligence as the global ranking, vendor trust, review patterns, verified pricing, compliance, reordered for the United States market.

#1

Splunk Enterprise Security

Deepest detection engineering for mature SOCs.

Founded 2003 · San Jose, CA · public · 500–100,000+ employees
G2 4.3 (540)
Capterra 4.4
Custom quote
○ Sales call required
Visit Splunk Enterprise Security

Splunk Enterprise Security (ES) is the SIEM with the deepest customization for mature detection engineering. The product's SPL (Search Processing Language) lets analysts write arbitrary detection logic with full programmatic control. Acquired by Cisco in March 2024 for $28B. Trade-offs: pricing among the highest in category ($150K-$5M+ annually), implementation complex (4-12 months for Fortune 500), and pricing complexity post-Cisco has eroded the category lead.

Best for

Mature SOC teams (10+ analysts) running custom detection engineering at Fortune 500 scale where SPL programmability is critical.

Worst for

Mid-market without dedicated SOC, Microsoft/Google-anchored organizations (native cloud SIEM cheaper), or organizations valuing predictable pricing.

Strengths

  • Deepest customization via SPL
  • Battle-tested at Fortune 500 scale
  • Mature partner ecosystem and certified analysts
  • Strongest detection engineering capability
  • Native UBA add-on (Splunk UBA)
  • Cisco network/observability integration post-2024 acquisition

Weaknesses

  • Pricing complexity post-Cisco; multiple pricing models still settling
  • Cost predictability difficult at scale
  • Implementation 4-12 months for Fortune 500
  • SPL learning curve steep
  • Licensing complexity (ingestion-based vs SVCs)
  • Customer support flagged through Cisco transition

Pricing tiers

opaque
  • Splunk Cloud
    Industry estimate $150K-$1M annually mid-enterprise
    Quote
  • Splunk Enterprise (on-prem)
    Industry estimate $300K-$5M+ annually for Fortune 500
    Quote
Watch for
  • · Implementation $50K-$500K via certified partners
  • · Splunk SOAR/Splunk UBA priced separately
  • · Multi-year contracts standard
  • · Ingestion overage pricing

Key features

  • +Custom detection via SPL
  • +Correlation searches
  • +Threat intelligence integration
  • +Splunk UBA (User Behavior Analytics)
  • +Splunk SOAR integration
  • +Cisco observability integration
  • +Custom dashboards
  • +Compliance reporting
700+ integrations
Cisco Network MonitoringAWSAzureGCPMicrosoft Sentinel
Geography
Global
#2

Microsoft Sentinel

Cloud-native SIEM for Microsoft-anchored organizations.

Founded 2019 · Redmond, WA · public · 500–100,000+ employees
G2 4.4 (880)
Capterra 4.5
From $0 /mo
● Transparent pricing
Visit Microsoft Sentinel

Microsoft Sentinel is the cloud-native SIEM tightly integrated with the Microsoft security stack, Defender XDR, Microsoft 365, Azure AD/Entra, and Azure security services. The product's defining advantage: free ingestion tiers for Microsoft data sources, dramatically reducing total cost for organizations already on Microsoft 365 + Azure. Trade-offs: best-fit narrowed to Microsoft-anchored orgs, KQL learning curve, less customization than Splunk SPL.

Best for

Organizations already on Microsoft 365 + Azure (especially Defender XDR) wanting native SIEM at significantly lower TCO than Splunk.

Worst for

Multi-cloud or AWS-primary organizations, mature SOCs needing SPL-level customization, or anyone running primarily non-Microsoft data sources.

Strengths

  • Cloud-native scale on Azure
  • Native integration with Defender XDR, Microsoft 365, Azure AD/Entra
  • Free ingestion tiers for Microsoft data sources (huge cost saving)
  • Microsoft Security Copilot AI assistant
  • Mature SOAR (Sentinel Automation)
  • Fits Microsoft 365 + Azure shops

Weaknesses

  • Best-fit narrowed to Microsoft-anchored organizations
  • KQL (Kusto Query Language) learning curve
  • Less customization than Splunk SPL
  • Non-Microsoft data ingestion priced normally
  • Support is hit-or-miss

Pricing tiers

public
  • Pay-As-You-Go
    $2.46/GB ingested standard; Microsoft data free
    $0 /mo
  • Commitment Tiers
    Lower per-GB rate at higher commitment
    $0 /mo
Watch for
  • · Non-Microsoft data ingestion priced normally
  • · Microsoft Defender XDR priced separately
  • · Multi-year commitments at higher tiers

Key features

  • +Cloud-native SIEM
  • +Native Defender XDR integration
  • +Microsoft 365 free data ingestion
  • +KQL query language
  • +Microsoft Security Copilot AI
  • +Sentinel Automation (SOAR)
  • +Workbooks (custom dashboards)
  • +300+ data connectors
300+ integrations
Microsoft 365AzureDefender XDRAzure AD/EntraPower BI
Geography
Global; Azure regions
#3

Google SecOps (Chronicle)

Predictable per-employee pricing with unlimited ingestion.

Founded 2018 · Mountain View, CA · public · 500–100,000+ employees
G2 4.5 (240)
Capterra 4.6
From $0 + $6 /mo + /employee
◐ Partial disclosure
Visit Google SecOps (Chronicle)

Google SecOps (formerly Chronicle, now part of Google Security Operations) is the cloud-native SIEM built on Google's search infrastructure. The product's defining choice: per-employee pricing instead of per-GB ingestion, which dramatically simplifies cost predictability for high-data-volume organizations. Trade-offs: best-fit narrowed to organizations comfortable with Google Cloud, smaller ecosystem than Microsoft, less mature than Splunk for custom detection.

Best for

Mid-market and enterprise organizations on or considering Google Cloud, with high data volumes where per-employee pricing dramatically beats per-GB ingestion.

Worst for

Microsoft 365 / Azure shops (Sentinel wins on free Microsoft data), or organizations with mature Splunk-based detection engineering.

Strengths

  • Per-employee pricing, not per-GB ingestion
  • Unlimited data retention at predictable cost
  • Built on Google search infrastructure (extreme scale)
  • Native Mandiant threat intelligence (Google acquired 2022)
  • Google Cloud security integration
  • Strong AI features via Vertex AI integration

Weaknesses

  • Best-fit narrowed to Google Cloud-comfortable organizations
  • Smaller ecosystem than Microsoft Sentinel
  • Less mature for custom detection vs Splunk
  • Non-cloud-native organizations harder to onboard
  • Uneven support quality

Pricing tiers

partial
  • Standard
    Industry estimate ~$72/employee/year
    $0+$6 /mo +/emp
  • Enterprise
    Industry estimate ~$120/employee/year with advanced features
    $0+$10 /mo +/emp
  • Enterprise+
    Custom enterprise with Mandiant Hunt
    Quote
Watch for
  • · Mandiant threat intel add-on
  • · Implementation services
  • · Multi-year commitments common

Key features

  • +Per-employee pricing model
  • +Unlimited data retention
  • +Mandiant threat intelligence integration
  • +YARA-L detection language
  • +AI features via Vertex AI
  • +Google Cloud security integration
  • +SOAR via Chronicle
  • +Pre-built parsers for 100+ sources
200+ integrations
Google CloudGCP Security Command CenterMandiantAWSAzure
Geography
Global
#4

Exabeam Fusion SIEM

Behavioral analytics-led SIEM with native UEBA.

Founded 2013 · Foster City, CA · private · 500–10,000+ employees
G2 4.3 (380)
Capterra 4.3
Custom quote
○ Sales call required
Visit Exabeam Fusion SIEM

Exabeam built its business on UEBA (User and Entity Behavior Analytics), the platform was UEBA-first before adding SIEM capability. The result is the strongest behavioral detection in the category, particularly for insider threats and account compromise. Exabeam Fusion SIEM combines UEBA + SIEM + SOAR. Trade-offs: pricing higher than Microsoft Sentinel, brand momentum has slowed, and SIEM core (vs UEBA) less mature than Splunk.

Best for

Organizations focused on insider threat and account compromise detection where behavioral analytics outweighs SIEM core depth.

Worst for

Mature SOCs running custom detection engineering (Splunk wins), Microsoft-anchored shops (Sentinel cheaper), or buyers wanting predictable pricing.

Strengths

  • UEBA-first architecture; strongest behavioral detection
  • Native investigation timelines (Smart Timelines)
  • Insider threat and account compromise detection
  • Combined SIEM + UEBA + SOAR platform
  • Cloud-native architecture

Weaknesses

  • Pricing higher than Microsoft Sentinel
  • Brand momentum has slowed since 2023 layoffs
  • SIEM core less mature than Splunk
  • Support depends on tier
  • Multi-year contracts standard

Pricing tiers

opaque
  • Fusion SIEM
    Industry estimate $80K-$300K annually mid-enterprise
    Quote
  • Enterprise
    Industry estimate $300K-$1M+ annually
    Quote
Watch for
  • · Multi-year contracts standard
  • · Implementation services

Key features

  • +UEBA (User Entity Behavior Analytics)
  • +Smart Timelines for investigations
  • +Insider threat detection
  • +SIEM (logs and correlation)
  • +SOAR automation
  • +Cloud-native architecture
  • +Risk scoring
  • +Pre-built use case packs
350+ integrations
Microsoft 365AWSGCPOktaCrowdStrike
Geography
Global
#5

Securonix

Next-gen SIEM with native AI/ML for autonomous SOC.

Founded 2008 · Addison, TX · private · 200–10,000+ employees
G2 4.4 (240)
Capterra 4.5
Custom quote
○ Sales call required
Visit Securonix

Securonix is the next-generation SIEM with native AI/ML for autonomous SOC operations. The product converges SIEM + UEBA + SOAR + threat intelligence into a unified platform on Snowflake-based architecture. Works for organizations consolidating fragmented security tools. Trade-offs: pricing opaque, implementation complex, brand recognition lower than Splunk.

Best for

Mid-market and enterprise SOC teams (200-5,000 employees) consolidating fragmented SIEM + UEBA + SOAR + threat intel into unified platform.

Worst for

Mature SOCs with existing custom detection (Splunk wins), Microsoft-anchored orgs (Sentinel cheaper), or buyers wanting transparent pricing.

Strengths

  • Native AI/ML for autonomous SOC operations
  • Snowflake-based architecture for scale
  • Combined SIEM + UEBA + SOAR + threat intel
  • Built for tool consolidation
  • Modern UX

Weaknesses

  • Pricing opaque
  • Implementation complex (4-12 weeks)
  • Brand recognition lower than Splunk
  • Support inconsistency reported
  • Multi-year contracts

Pricing tiers

opaque
  • Standard
    Industry estimate $100K-$300K annually
    Quote
  • Enterprise
    Industry estimate $300K-$1M+ annually
    Quote
Watch for
  • · Multi-year contracts standard
  • · Implementation services

Key features

  • +Native AI/ML detection
  • +Snowflake-based architecture
  • +UEBA + SIEM + SOAR unified
  • +Threat intelligence integration
  • +Cloud-native architecture
  • +Pre-built use case packs
  • +Custom dashboards
  • +API for custom workflows
400+ integrations
SnowflakeAWSAzureOktaCrowdStrike
Geography
Global
#6

IBM QRadar

Long-standing IBM enterprise SIEM with mainframe integration.

Founded 2001 · Armonk, NY (IBM HQ) · public · 1,000–100,000+ employees
G2 4.0 (480)
Capterra 4.1
Custom quote
○ Sales call required
Visit IBM QRadar

IBM QRadar is one of the longest-standing enterprise SIEM platforms. Acquired by IBM in 2011 for $1.4B. Best-fit for traditional enterprises with IBM mainframe integration needs and existing IBM Security Suite (QRadar SIEM, QRadar SOAR, QRadar XDR). Trade-offs: brand momentum has slowed, pricing high, IBM Security divestiture sale to Palo Alto Networks (announced 2024) creates uncertainty.

Best for

Traditional enterprises (banks, insurance, government) with IBM mainframe integration needs and existing IBM Security Suite footprint.

Worst for

Modern cloud-native organizations (Microsoft Sentinel wins), Splunk-anchored SOCs, or anyone affected by Palo Alto acquisition uncertainty.

Strengths

  • Long-standing enterprise SIEM (founded 2001)
  • Tightest IBM mainframe integration
  • Made for traditional enterprises (banks, government)
  • Mature compliance reporting
  • IBM Security Suite integration

Weaknesses

  • Brand momentum slowed since IBM Security divestiture announcement
  • Pricing high
  • UI feels older than next-gen SIEMs
  • Implementation complex
  • Palo Alto acquisition (announced 2024) creates roadmap uncertainty
  • Customer support flagged through transitions

Pricing tiers

opaque
  • On-premises
    Industry estimate $100K-$500K annually
    Quote
  • On-Cloud (IBM Cloud)
    Industry estimate $200K-$2M+ annually
    Quote
Watch for
  • · IBM Security Suite licensing
  • · Multi-year contracts standard
  • · Implementation services

Key features

  • +Events-per-second based licensing
  • +Tightest IBM mainframe integration
  • +Compliance reporting (PCI, HIPAA, SOX)
  • +IBM Security Suite integration
  • +X-Force threat intelligence
  • +On-prem or cloud deployment
  • +Custom dashboards
  • +Threat hunting features
400+ integrations
IBM Cloud SecurityIBM mainframesAWSAzureGCPMicrosoft 365
Geography
Global
#7

Sumo Logic Cloud SIEM

Logs-led security with cloud-native architecture.

Founded 2010 · Redwood City, CA · pe backed · 200–10,000 employees
G2 4.3 (380)
Capterra 4.3
Custom quote
◐ Partial disclosure
Visit Sumo Logic Cloud SIEM

Sumo Logic Cloud SIEM extends Sumo Logic's log analytics platform into security. Best-fit for organizations where log analytics is the broader observability need and security is one use case. Same product covered in our Top 10 APM, different evaluation framework here for security operations.

Best for

Mid-market and enterprise teams (200-5,000 employees) where log analytics is the primary observability need with security as a useful complement.

Worst for

Pure-play SIEM buyers (Splunk or Microsoft Sentinel better), modern engineering-led teams, or anyone concerned about PE changes.

Strengths

  • Cloud-native architecture from day one
  • Log analytics heritage
  • Combined observability + security use cases
  • Mature high-volume log ingestion
  • Pre-built security packs

Weaknesses

  • SIEM less mature than Splunk
  • PE-driven roadmap concerns
  • Brand momentum slowed
  • Customer support variable
  • Pricing requires sales engagement at higher tiers

Pricing tiers

partial
  • Cloud SIEM Enterprise
    Industry estimate $80K-$300K annually
    Quote
Watch for
  • · Volume overage pricing
  • · Multi-year contracts at higher tiers

Key features

  • +Cloud SIEM with log analytics
  • +Cloud-native architecture
  • +Pre-built security packs
  • +AI assistant
  • +High-volume log ingestion
  • +SOAR via Sumo Logic SOAR
  • +Threat hunting
  • +Custom dashboards
250+ integrations
AWSGCPAzureKubernetesSplunk
Geography
Global
#8

Rapid7 InsightIDR

Mid-market SIEM with native vulnerability management.

Founded 2011 · Boston, MA · public · 100–5,000 employees
G2 4.4 (280)
Capterra 4.5
Custom quote
◐ Partial disclosure
Visit Rapid7 InsightIDR

Rapid7 InsightIDR is the SIEM component of the Rapid7 Insight platform, combined with InsightVM (vulnerability management) and InsightAppSec (application security). Best-fit for mid-market security teams that want SIEM + vulnerability management on one platform without enterprise-tier complexity. Trade-offs: SIEM less customizable than Splunk, smaller ecosystem than Microsoft Sentinel.

Best for

Mid-market security teams (100-2,000 employees) wanting SIEM + vulnerability management on one platform without enterprise complexity.

Worst for

Mature SOCs needing Splunk-level customization, Microsoft-anchored orgs (Sentinel cheaper), or large enterprises (Splunk or Microsoft win).

Strengths

  • Combined SIEM + vulnerability management
  • Strong mid-market fit (100-2,000 employees)
  • Cloud-native architecture
  • Public company financial transparency
  • User Behavior Analytics (UBA) included
  • Mature partner ecosystem

Weaknesses

  • SIEM less customizable than Splunk
  • Smaller ecosystem than Microsoft Sentinel
  • AI features less mature than Securonix
  • Support response times vary
  • Best-fit ceiling around 5,000 employees

Pricing tiers

partial
  • InsightIDR
    Industry estimate ~$5-$10/asset/month
    Quote
  • InsightIDR Ultimate
    Industry estimate $15-$25/asset/month with extended retention
    Quote
Watch for
  • · InsightVM (vulnerability management) priced separately
  • · Multi-year contracts standard

Key features

  • +Cloud SIEM
  • +User Behavior Analytics (UBA)
  • +Endpoint detection and response
  • +Threat intelligence integration
  • +Combined with InsightVM (vulnerability management)
  • +Pre-built detection rules
  • +Investigations workflow
  • +Mobile apps
200+ integrations
AWSAzureOktaCrowdStrikeMicrosoft Defender
Geography
Global
#9

Devo

Real-time analytics on petabyte-scale data.

Founded 2011 · Boston, MA · private · 1,000–100,000+ employees
G2 4.5 (180)
Capterra 4.5
Custom quote
○ Sales call required
Visit Devo

Devo is the SIEM built for hyper-scale data, real-time analytics on petabyte-scale logs without the data tiering complexity of Splunk. Best for MSSPs and enterprises with extreme data volumes. Trade-offs: pricing opaque, brand recognition lower than Splunk, smaller ecosystem.

Best for

MSSPs and enterprises (1,000+ employees) with extreme data volumes (petabyte-scale) where Splunk's data tiering complexity is the bottleneck.

Worst for

Mid-market under 500 employees, organizations without dedicated data engineering, or anyone wanting transparent pricing.

Strengths

  • Real-time analytics on petabyte-scale data
  • No data tiering complexity
  • Right call for MSSPs and high-data-volume enterprises
  • 400 days hot data retention
  • Modern UX

Weaknesses

  • Pricing opaque
  • Brand recognition lower than Splunk
  • Smaller ecosystem
  • Implementation requires data architecture expertise
  • Support is hit-or-miss

Pricing tiers

opaque
  • Devo SIEM
    Industry estimate $100K-$1M+ annually
    Quote
Watch for
  • · Multi-year contracts standard
  • · Implementation services

Key features

  • +Real-time analytics
  • +400 days hot data retention
  • +Petabyte-scale ingestion
  • +Pre-built use case packs
  • +AI features
  • +Custom dashboards
  • +API for custom workflows
  • +Multi-tenant for MSSPs
200+ integrations
AWSAzureGCPSplunkCrowdStrike
Geography
Global
#10

LogRhythm

On-prem legacy SIEM with co-managed services.

Founded 2003 · Boulder, CO · private · 500–10,000+ employees
G2 4.0 (280)
Capterra 4.1
Custom quote
○ Sales call required
Visit LogRhythm

LogRhythm is one of the longest-standing SIEM platforms (founded 2003), known for on-premises deployment and co-managed services for resource-limited SOCs. Merged with Exabeam in 2024 to create combined SIEM + UEBA platform. Trade-offs: on-prem heritage feels older than cloud-native competitors, post-merger product roadmap settling, brand momentum slowed.

Best for

Traditional enterprises (banks, government, healthcare) requiring on-premises SIEM deployment with co-managed services for resource-limited SOCs.

Worst for

Cloud-native organizations, modern SOCs (any cloud-native SIEM wins), or anyone affected by post-merger uncertainty.

Strengths

  • Long-standing SIEM (founded 2003)
  • On-premises deployment option
  • Co-managed services for resource-limited SOCs
  • Works for traditional enterprises
  • Mature compliance reporting

Weaknesses

  • On-prem heritage feels older than cloud-native
  • Post-Exabeam merger roadmap settling
  • Brand momentum slowed
  • UI dated
  • Uneven support quality

Pricing tiers

opaque
  • On-Premises
    Industry estimate $80K-$500K annually
    Quote
  • Cloud
    Industry estimate $100K-$300K annually
    Quote
Watch for
  • · Co-managed services priced separately
  • · Multi-year contracts standard

Key features

  • +On-premises or cloud SIEM
  • +Co-managed services
  • +Compliance reporting
  • +AI Engine for detection
  • +CloudAI integration
  • +Threat intelligence
  • +Custom dashboards
  • +SOAR integration
250+ integrations
Microsoft 365AWSCisco network monitoringCrowdStrikeOkta
Geography
Global

Frequently asked questions

The questions buyers actually ask before they sign.

Which SIEM is FedRAMP authorized for US federal civilian agencies?
As of 2026, Microsoft Sentinel for Government (FedRAMP High), Splunk GovCloud (FedRAMP High), and Google SecOps GovCloud (FedRAMP Moderate) are the primary authorized options. Civilian agencies on Microsoft 365 GCC High typically deploy Sentinel for Government as the native SIEM. Defense agencies with IL4/IL5 requirements typically run Splunk GovCloud or Sentinel for Government in isolated environments. Always verify authorization status at marketplace.fedramp.gov before procurement.
Does the SEC cyber disclosure rule (2023) require a specific SIEM?
No. The SEC Rule 10K/8K (effective December 2023) requires public companies to disclose material cybersecurity incidents within four business days and describe their cybersecurity risk management in annual filings, but does not prescribe a specific SIEM. In practice, you need a SIEM capable of generating documented incident timelines and supporting legal/compliance review workflows. Splunk Enterprise Security and Microsoft Sentinel both ship pre-built playbooks for SEC disclosure documentation. Your SIEM needs to integrate with your legal ticketing workflow (ServiceNow, Jira).
How does NIST CSF 2.0 affect SIEM selection?
NIST CSF 2.0 (released February 2024) added a sixth function (Govern) to the original five (Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, Recover). For SIEM evaluation, the Detect and Respond functions remain the primary mapping targets. Most US enterprise SIEM RFPs now require vendors to map detection rules to NIST CSF 2.0 functions. Splunk, Sentinel, Google SecOps, and Exabeam all publish CSF 2.0 content packs. Sumo Logic and Rapid7 InsightIDR are thinner on CSF 2.0 pre-built content.
Is Splunk still the right choice after the Cisco acquisition?
Splunk remains the strongest SIEM for mature SOCs running custom detection engineering, and SPL programmability has no peer in 2026. The Cisco acquisition (March 2024) has not simplified pricing, and Cisco integration is still in early stages. For buyers who need SPL depth and are comfortable with Splunk pricing complexity, the answer is yes. For buyers evaluating Splunk primarily because it is familiar, Microsoft Sentinel and Google SecOps are meaningfully cheaper for Microsoft/Google-anchored environments. Run a TCO model before renewing or signing a new Splunk contract.
Splunk vs Microsoft Sentinel, which one?
Splunk if you have a mature SOC running custom detection engineering with SPL programmability. Microsoft Sentinel if you're Microsoft 365 + Azure-anchored, free ingestion for Microsoft data sources dramatically reduces TCO. At $200K+ annual spend, Sentinel often comes in 40-60% cheaper for Microsoft-anchored orgs.
How much should I budget for SIEM?
Mid-market (200-1,000 employees): $50K-$300K annually. Enterprise (1,000-5,000): $300K-$1.5M annually. Large enterprise (5,000-50,000): $1.5M-$15M annually. Add 0.5x-2x first-year for implementation. SIEM TCO is heavily driven by data ingestion volume; reducing log volume is the #1 cost lever.
How long does SIEM implementation take?
Microsoft Sentinel: 4-12 weeks for Microsoft-anchored orgs. Google SecOps: 4-12 weeks. Sumo Logic, Rapid7: 4-12 weeks. Exabeam, Securonix, Devo: 8-16 weeks. Splunk Enterprise Security: 12-32+ weeks for Fortune 500. IBM QRadar, LogRhythm: 16-32 weeks.
Should I pick standalone SIEM or integrated SecOps platform?
Standalone SIEM (Splunk, IBM QRadar): better when you have separate UEBA, SOAR, threat intel investments and want best-in-class SIEM. Integrated SecOps (Microsoft Sentinel, Google SecOps, Securonix, Exabeam, Rapid7): better when you're consolidating multiple security tools to reduce vendor sprawl. The 2026 trend strongly favors consolidation.
How does SIEM pricing actually work?
Per-GB ingestion (Splunk on-prem, Microsoft Sentinel default): pay for data volume. Per-EPS (events per second; IBM QRadar): pay for event volume. Per-employee (Google SecOps): predictable scaling. Per-asset (Rapid7): predictable scaling. Free Microsoft data on Sentinel for Microsoft 365 + Azure customers is a huge cost benefit.
What about MSSPs and co-managed SOC?
For organizations without dedicated SOC capacity, MSSPs (Mandiant, CrowdStrike, Arctic Wolf, etc.) provide co-managed services on top of underlying SIEM platforms. LogRhythm and Devo have strong MSSP heritage. Microsoft Sentinel + Defender supports many MSSPs. Splunk + partner network is enterprise default.
Can I evaluate via free trial?
Microsoft Sentinel: 31-day free trial + free Microsoft data ingestion. Google SecOps: 15-day free trial. Splunk Enterprise Security: 14-day. Rapid7: 30-day. Sumo Logic: 30-day. Demo only: Exabeam, Securonix, IBM QRadar, Devo, LogRhythm.
How does AI fit into SIEM?
AI in SIEM 2026: (1) UEBA, Exabeam, Securonix, Splunk UBA. (2) Detection authoring, Microsoft Sentinel Copilot, Google Duet AI. (3) Investigation acceleration, Smart Timelines (Exabeam), Microsoft Security Copilot. (4) Autonomous SOC, Securonix, Sumo Logic AI. AI is moving from differentiator to baseline expectation in 2026.

Final word

Looking at a different market? See the global SIEM Software ranking, or pick another country at the top of this page.

Last updated 2026-05-17. Local pricing reverified quarterly. Found something inaccurate? Tell us.