Skip to content
Z Zendikt
Editorial deep-dive · 10 products · Verified 2026-05-08

Top 10 Identity & Access Management (IAM) / SSO Software for 2026

Independent ranking of IAM and SSO platforms, verified pricing, vendor trust scoring, and direct calls on which platform does not fit which buyer.

Verdict (TL;DR)

Verified 2026-05-08

Identity is the new perimeter. Okta remains the workforce IAM market leader with the deepest integration ecosystem (7,000+ pre-built integrations) but pricing has escalated meaningfully and the 2022/2023 breach disclosures damaged trust. Microsoft Entra ID (formerly Azure AD) is the de facto default for any organization on Microsoft 365, bundled at no extra cost in M365 E3/E5 plans, which is the single biggest competitive lever in the category. JumpCloud is the SMB IAM + directory leader at $11-$24/user/mo. Auth0 (Okta) leads customer IAM (CIAM). Ping Identity is the enterprise IAM alternative for non-Microsoft shops. Duo (Cisco) is MFA-anchored. The category structural shift in 2026: passwordless authentication (passkeys, FIDO2) is now table-stakes, vendors still gating these features behind premium tiers are losing share to Beyond Identity and Microsoft Entra.

Best for your specific use case

  • Best-of-breed workforce IAM: Okta Workforce Identity Deepest integration ecosystem (7,000+). Market leader. Made for 500+ employee orgs that aren't Microsoft-anchored.
  • Microsoft 365 organizations: Microsoft Entra ID Bundled with M365 E3/E5 at no extra cost. Default choice if you're already on Microsoft.
  • SMB IAM + directory + endpoint: JumpCloud IAM + directory + RMM at $11-$24/user/mo. Best fit for 25-500 employee SMBs without dedicated IT.
  • Customer IAM (B2C/B2B): Auth0 (Okta) CIAM market leader. Best for embedding identity in customer-facing apps. Generous free tier.
  • Enterprise IAM for non-Microsoft: Ping Identity Enterprise IAM alternative to Okta. Best for non-Microsoft enterprises with complex identity governance.
  • Identity governance (IGA): CyberArk Identity PAM-anchored identity platform. Right call for enterprises with privileged access governance needs.
  • MFA-first deployment: Duo Security (Cisco) MFA market leader. Strong fit if MFA is the primary need; SSO comes later.
  • Mid-market alternative to Okta: OneLogin (One Identity) Lower-cost Okta alternative. Acquired by One Identity in 2021.
  • Passwordless-first architecture: Beyond Identity Passkey/FIDO2-native architecture. Best for security-forward orgs eliminating passwords entirely.
  • Rippling-anchored SMBs: Rippling SSO Bundled with Rippling HRIS. Default for Rippling-committed SMBs wanting unified employee + identity lifecycle.

Identity and access management is the security foundation of every modern organization, it controls who can access what, with what credentials, under what conditions. The category has consolidated around three buyer journeys: workforce IAM (employees accessing company apps), customer IAM (your apps authenticating end users), and identity governance (compliance-grade access reviews). We synthesized 48,000+ reviews across G2, Capterra, Reddit, and Trustpilot to rank the platforms covering each.

Cross-category note: many IAM decisions are coupled with HRIS (employee lifecycle drives provisioning) and SIEM (identity events feed security operations). For HRIS see our Top 10 HRIS / Core HR Software; for SIEM see our Top 10 SIEM Software. We use distinct product IDs (e.g. `rippling-sso` vs `rippling-hris`) where products span multiple categories.

At a glance

Quick comparison

Product Best for Starts at 10-emp/mo* Pricing G2 Geo
1 Okta Workforce Identity
Non-Microsoft enterprises
$2 $2 4.5 Global; strongest in US, EU, UK
2 Microsoft Entra ID
Any Microsoft-anchored organization
$0 + $0/emp $0 4.5 Global; strongest in US, EU, AU; worldwide
3 JumpCloud
SMBs without dedicated IT
$0 + $0/emp $0 4.5 Global; strongest in US, UK, AU
4 Auth0 (Okta)
Engineering teams building customer apps
$0 + $0/emp $0 4.4 Global; strongest in US, EU, UK
5 Ping Identity
Non-Microsoft enterprises
Quote - 4.4 Global; strongest in US, EU, UK
6 CyberArk Identity
CyberArk-anchored enterprises
Quote - 4.4 Global; strongest in US, EU, Israel
7 Duo Security (Cisco)
MFA-first deployments and Cisco-anchored
$0 + $0/emp $0 4.5 Global; strongest in US, EU, UK
8 OneLogin (One Identity)
Mid-market non-Microsoft
$4 $4 4.4 Global; strongest in US, EU, UK
9 Beyond Identity
Security-forward organizations
Quote - 4.5 Global; strongest in US, UK
10 Rippling SSO
Rippling-anchored SMBs
Quote - 4.6 Primarily US; growing international

*10-employee monthly cost = base fee + (per-employee × 10) using the lowest published tier. For opaque-pricing vendors, no value is shown.

Pricing calculator

What will it actually cost you?

Enter your team size below. We compute the true monthly cost for each product’s lowest published tier. Opaque-pricing vendors are excluded, get a quote.

Multi-state requires Gusto Plus or higher; OnPay charges no extra. Calculator picks the cheapest valid tier.

Estimated monthly cost (cheapest first)

    Note: Estimates are list-price floors. Real-world costs include benefits passthrough, time tracking add-ons, and implementation fees. Negotiated rates often run 10–30% lower at scale.
    Personalized ranking

    Weight what matters to you

    Drag the sliders. The list re-ranks in real time based on your priorities. Default weights match our methodology.

    Your personalized ranking

    Default weights
      Migration matrix

      How hard is it to switch?

      Switching cost is the lock-in tax. Read row → column: “If I'm on X today, how painful is moving to Y?” Estimates based on data export quality, year-end form continuity, and reported migration time.

      From ↓ / To → Okta Workforce Identity Microsoft Entra ID JumpCloud Auth0 (Okta) Ping Identity CyberArk Identity Duo Security (Cisco) OneLogin (One Identity) Beyond Identity Rippling SSO
      Okta Workforce Identity
      -
      Medium 6
      Medium 6
      Hard 7
      Medium 6
      Medium 6
      Hard 7
      Medium 5
      Medium 6
      Medium 6
      Microsoft Entra ID
      Medium 6
      -
      OK 4
      Medium 5
      OK 4
      OK 4
      Medium 5
      Hard 7
      OK 4
      OK 4
      JumpCloud
      Medium 6
      OK 4
      -
      Medium 5
      OK 4
      OK 4
      Medium 5
      Hard 7
      OK 4
      OK 4
      Auth0 (Okta)
      Hard 7
      Medium 5
      Medium 5
      -
      Medium 5
      Medium 5
      Medium 6
      OK 4
      Medium 5
      Medium 5
      Ping Identity
      Medium 6
      OK 4
      OK 4
      Medium 5
      -
      OK 4
      Medium 5
      Hard 7
      OK 4
      OK 4
      CyberArk Identity
      Medium 6
      OK 4
      OK 4
      Medium 5
      OK 4
      -
      Medium 5
      Hard 7
      OK 4
      OK 4
      Duo Security (Cisco)
      Hard 7
      Medium 5
      Medium 5
      Medium 6
      Medium 5
      Medium 5
      -
      OK 4
      Medium 5
      Medium 5
      OneLogin (One Identity)
      Medium 5
      Hard 7
      Hard 7
      OK 4
      Hard 7
      Hard 7
      OK 4
      -
      Hard 7
      Hard 7
      Beyond Identity
      Medium 6
      OK 4
      OK 4
      Medium 5
      OK 4
      OK 4
      Medium 5
      Hard 7
      -
      OK 4
      Rippling SSO
      Medium 6
      OK 4
      OK 4
      Medium 5
      OK 4
      OK 4
      Medium 5
      Hard 7
      OK 4
      -
      Easy (0–2) OK (3–4) Medium (5–6) Hard (7–8) Very hard (9–10)
      The ranking

      All 10, ranked and reviewed

      Each product gets the same scrutiny: who it’s actually best for, where it falls short, what it really costs, and how it scores across six dimensions.

      #1

      Okta Workforce Identity

      Workforce IAM market leader with the deepest integration ecosystem.

      Founded 2009 · San Francisco, CA · public · 100–100,000+ employees
      G2 4.5 (8,420)
      Capterra 4.6
      From $2 /mo
      ● Transparent pricing
      Visit Okta Workforce Identity

      Okta is the workforce IAM market leader with the deepest integration ecosystem in the category (7,000+ pre-built app integrations). Founded 2009, public 2017. Best fit for 500+ employee organizations that aren't Microsoft-anchored. Trade-offs: pricing has escalated meaningfully ($2-$15/user/mo per module, adds up fast with multiple modules), the 2022 Lapsus$ breach and 2023 support system breach damaged trust, and Microsoft Entra is taking share from Microsoft-anchored orgs through the M365 bundle.

      Best for

      Non-Microsoft enterprises (500-50,000 employees) requiring deep workforce IAM with 7,000+ app integrations and mature SCIM provisioning.

      Worst for

      Microsoft 365-anchored organizations (Entra ID bundled at no extra cost), SMBs under 100 employees (JumpCloud cheaper), or customer-facing apps (Auth0 better fit; same vendor).

      Strengths

      • Deepest integration ecosystem (7,000+ pre-built apps)
      • Workforce IAM market leader
      • Fits non-Microsoft enterprises
      • Mature SCIM provisioning
      • Workflow Automation (Workflows)
      • Public company financial transparency

      Weaknesses

      • Pricing escalates meaningfully with multiple modules
      • 2022 Lapsus$ breach + 2023 support system breach damaged trust
      • Microsoft Entra taking share from M365 orgs
      • Per-module pricing creates surprise costs
      • Customer support quality declined post-2022

      Pricing tiers

      public
      • SSO
        Per user; basic SSO
        $2 /mo
      • Adaptive MFA
        Per user; risk-based MFA
        $4 /mo
      • Lifecycle Mgmt
        Per user; SCIM provisioning
        $4 /mo
      • Identity Governance
        Per user; access reviews
        $9 /mo
      • Workflows
        Per user; automation
        $3 /mo
      • Workforce Identity Cloud
        Bundled enterprise
        Quote
      Watch for
      • · Per-module pricing adds up fast
      • · Annual price increases of 10-15%
      • · Onboarding fees ($5K-$50K)
      • · Workflows and Identity Governance separate

      Key features

      • +SSO (7,000+ pre-built apps)
      • +Adaptive MFA with risk scoring
      • +Lifecycle management (SCIM)
      • +Identity Governance (access reviews)
      • +Workflows automation
      • +API Access Management
      • +Customer Identity (Auth0)
      • +Mobile apps
      7000+ integrations
      SalesforceMicrosoft 365Google WorkspaceAWSSlackWorkday HCM
      Geography
      Global; strongest in US, EU, UK
      #2

      Microsoft Entra ID

      De facto default for any organization on Microsoft 365.

      Founded 2014 · Redmond, WA · public · 1–500,000+ employees
      G2 4.5 (7,280)
      Capterra 4.6
      From $0 + $0 /mo + /employee
      ● Transparent pricing
      Visit Microsoft Entra ID

      Microsoft Entra ID (formerly Azure AD) is the de facto default workforce IAM for any organization on Microsoft 365. Bundled at no extra cost in M365 E3/E5 plans, the single biggest competitive lever in the IAM category. Best fit for any Microsoft-anchored organization. Trade-offs: outside the Microsoft ecosystem the product is meaningfully weaker, integration ecosystem narrower than Okta (~3,000 vs 7,000), and Entra Premium P1/P2 add-ons cost extra ($6-$9/user/mo).

      Best for

      Any organization on Microsoft 365 E3/E5 (essentially the standard at zero marginal cost), particularly hybrid Active Directory environments and Microsoft-anchored enterprises.

      Worst for

      Non-Microsoft organizations (Okta better fit), customer-facing apps (Auth0/Okta CIC better), or SMBs without M365 (JumpCloud cheaper).

      Strengths

      • Bundled with Microsoft 365 E3/E5 at no extra cost
      • De facto default for Microsoft-anchored orgs
      • Native integration with all Microsoft products
      • Built for hybrid AD environments
      • Conditional Access policies industry-leading
      • FedRAMP High authorized

      Weaknesses

      • Outside Microsoft ecosystem meaningfully weaker
      • Integration ecosystem narrower than Okta (~3,000)
      • Entra Premium P1/P2 add-ons cost extra ($6-$9/user)
      • UX complexity high for non-Microsoft admins
      • Customer support quality varies by region

      Pricing tiers

      public
      • Free (Entra ID Free)
        Bundled with any Azure subscription; basic SSO
        $0+$0 /mo +/emp
      • Entra ID P1
        Bundled with M365 E3; Conditional Access
        $6 /mo
      • Entra ID P2
        Bundled with M365 E5; Identity Protection
        $9 /mo
      • Entra ID Governance
        Per user; access reviews, lifecycle workflows
        $7 /mo
      Watch for
      • · Premium tiers required for Conditional Access
      • · Entra Governance separate add-on
      • · Annual M365 price increases

      Key features

      • +SSO (3,000+ pre-built apps)
      • +Conditional Access policies
      • +Native Microsoft 365 integration
      • +Hybrid AD support
      • +Identity Protection (P2)
      • +Privileged Identity Management
      • +B2B and B2C support
      • +Mobile apps
      3000+ integrations
      Microsoft 365SalesforceWorkday HCMAWSGoogle WorkspaceServiceNow
      Geography
      Global; strongest in US, EU, AU; worldwide
      #3

      JumpCloud

      IAM + directory + RMM at $11-$24/user, SMB default.

      Founded 2012 · Louisville, CO · private · 10–500 employees
      G2 4.5 (2,480)
      Capterra 4.7
      From $0 + $0 /mo + /employee
      ● Transparent pricing
      Visit JumpCloud

      JumpCloud is the SMB IAM + directory + endpoint management leader. The product's strengths: cloud-native directory (Active Directory replacement), bundled SSO + MFA + RMM at $11-$24/user/mo, and zero-trust architecture. Best fit for 25-500 employee SMBs without dedicated IT, especially Mac-heavy shops where Active Directory was never a fit. Trade-offs: enterprise scaling above 1,000 users gets challenging, integration ecosystem narrower than Okta (~700 vs 7,000), and Support response times vary.

      Best for

      SMBs (25-500 employees) without dedicated IT, especially Mac-heavy shops needing IAM + directory + endpoint management bundled at affordable per-user pricing.

      Worst for

      Enterprise (1,000+ users, Okta/Entra better), Microsoft 365-anchored (Entra bundled cheaper), or customer IAM (Auth0 better).

      Strengths

      • Cloud-native directory (Active Directory replacement)
      • Bundled SSO + MFA + RMM at $11-$24/user/mo
      • Made for Mac-heavy shops
      • No dedicated IT required
      • Zero-trust architecture
      • Generous free tier (10 users)

      Weaknesses

      • Enterprise scaling above 1,000 users challenging
      • Integration ecosystem narrower than Okta (~700)
      • Support is hit-or-miss
      • Identity governance features limited
      • Outside SMB sweet spot less appealing

      Pricing tiers

      public
      • Free
        Up to 10 users, 10 devices
        $0+$0 /mo +/emp
      • Core Directory
        Per user; SSO, MFA, directory
        $11 /mo
      • Platform
        Per user; everything + RMM
        $24 /mo
      • Platform Prime
        Custom; advanced governance
        Quote
      Watch for
      • · Annual billing for discount
      • · Add-on for advanced governance

      Key features

      • +Cloud-native directory
      • +SSO (700+ pre-built apps)
      • +MFA
      • +Device management (RMM)
      • +Patch management
      • +SCIM provisioning
      • +Mobile apps
      • +Zero-trust architecture
      700+ integrations
      Microsoft 365Google WorkspaceAWSSalesforceSlackBambooHR
      Geography
      Global; strongest in US, UK, AU
      #4

      Auth0 (Okta)

      Customer IAM (CIAM) market leader.

      Founded 2013 · Bellevue, WA · public · Any (engineering teams) employees
      G2 4.4 (1,840)
      Capterra 4.4
      From $0 + $0 /mo + /employee
      ● Transparent pricing
      Visit Auth0 (Okta)

      Auth0 is the customer identity (CIAM) market leader, acquired by Okta in 2021 for $6.5B. Best fit for engineering teams embedding identity in customer-facing applications. The product's strengths: developer-first SDK ecosystem, generous free tier (25,000 MAU), and broad protocol support (OAuth, OIDC, SAML, social, passwordless, passkeys). Trade-offs: pricing scales with monthly active users (MAU), costs become meaningful above 100K MAU, and post-Okta acquisition trust impact from the 2022/2023 Okta breaches.

      Best for

      Engineering teams embedding identity in customer-facing apps (B2B SaaS, B2C apps, marketplaces) needing rapid integration across multiple protocols.

      Worst for

      Workforce IAM (Okta WIC or Entra better), small employee counts (overkill), or simple SSO use cases (cheaper alternatives suffice).

      Strengths

      • CIAM market leader
      • Developer-first SDK ecosystem (any language)
      • Generous free tier (25,000 MAU)
      • Broad protocol support (OAuth, OIDC, SAML, social, passwordless, passkeys)
      • Strong B2B and B2C use cases
      • Mature documentation

      Weaknesses

      • Pricing scales with MAU, meaningful above 100K
      • Post-Okta breach trust impact
      • Outside CIAM use case weaker than Okta WIC
      • Customer support quality declined post-Okta
      • Some enterprise features require Enterprise tier

      Pricing tiers

      public
      • Free
        Up to 25,000 MAU, 5 social connections
        $0+$0 /mo +/emp
      • Essentials (B2C)
        Up to 1,000 MAU; basic CIAM
        $35 /mo
      • Professional (B2C)
        Up to 1,000 MAU; advanced features
        $240 /mo
      • Enterprise
        Custom; SLA, advanced security
        Quote
      Watch for
      • · Per-MAU scaling can be steep
      • · Add-ons for advanced security
      • · B2B SSO Enterprise Connections at higher tier

      Key features

      • +SSO (OAuth, OIDC, SAML)
      • +Social login (50+ providers)
      • +Passwordless authentication
      • +Passkey support (FIDO2)
      • +M2M authentication
      • +B2B Organizations
      • +Hooks and Actions for customization
      • +1,000+ SDKs and tutorials
      200+ integrations
      AWSSalesforceMicrosoft AzureGoogle CloudStripeAuth0 Marketplace
      Geography
      Global; strongest in US, EU, UK
      #5

      Ping Identity

      Enterprise IAM alternative for non-Microsoft enterprises.

      Founded 2002 · Denver, CO · private · 1,000–500,000+ employees
      G2 4.4 (1,180)
      Capterra 4.4
      Custom quote
      ○ Sales call required
      Visit Ping Identity

      Ping Identity is the enterprise IAM alternative to Okta for non-Microsoft enterprises, founded 2002, taken private by Thoma Bravo in 2022 for $2.8B and merged with ForgeRock in 2023. The product's strengths: deep enterprise feature set, strong identity governance, and federation depth for complex enterprises. Best fit for 5,000+ employee enterprises with complex identity governance needs. Trade-offs: pricing escalated post-Thoma Bravo, ForgeRock merger created roadmap uncertainty, and product UX dated vs Okta.

      Best for

      Large non-Microsoft enterprises (5,000+ employees) with complex identity governance, federation, and consumer + workforce IAM needs.

      Worst for

      Microsoft 365-anchored (Entra better), SMB (overpriced, JumpCloud cheaper), or modern engineering teams (Auth0 better for CIAM).

      Strengths

      • Deep enterprise feature set
      • Strong identity governance (post-ForgeRock merger)
      • Federation depth for complex enterprises
      • Right call for 5,000+ employee non-Microsoft
      • PingOne unified platform

      Weaknesses

      • Pricing escalated post-Thoma Bravo (2022)
      • ForgeRock merger roadmap uncertainty
      • Product UX dated vs Okta
      • Uneven support quality post-acquisition
      • Innovation pace slower than Okta/Entra

      Pricing tiers

      opaque
      • PingOne Workforce
        ~$3-$8/user/mo typical
        Quote
      • PingOne Customer
        Per MAU; CIAM
        Quote
      • PingOne Identity Governance
        Per user; access reviews
        Quote
      • Enterprise Bundle
        Custom; advanced features
        Quote
      Watch for
      • · Per-product pricing adds up
      • · Implementation fee ($25K-$200K)
      • · Annual price increases of 8-12%

      Key features

      • +SSO (3,000+ pre-built apps)
      • +Adaptive MFA
      • +Identity Governance (post-ForgeRock)
      • +Federation (complex enterprise)
      • +PingOne Customer (CIAM)
      • +API security
      • +Mobile apps
      3000+ integrations
      SalesforceMicrosoft 365Workday HCMAWSGoogle WorkspaceServiceNow
      Geography
      Global; strongest in US, EU, UK
      #6

      CyberArk Identity

      PAM-anchored identity platform for governance-heavy enterprises.

      Founded 1999 · Petach Tikva, Israel · public · 1,000–500,000+ employees
      G2 4.4 (980)
      Capterra 4.4
      Custom quote
      ○ Sales call required
      Visit CyberArk Identity

      CyberArk Identity is the identity platform from CyberArk, the privileged access management (PAM) leader. The product extends CyberArk's PAM strength into broader workforce identity. Best fit for enterprises that already run CyberArk PAM and want unified identity governance. Trade-offs: outside the CyberArk ecosystem the product is less compelling (Okta/Entra deeper for general workforce IAM), pricing meaningful, and sales process enterprise-only.

      Best for

      Enterprises (5,000+ employees) already running CyberArk PAM, wanting unified identity governance and risk-based authentication.

      Worst for

      Non-CyberArk shops (Okta/Entra better), SMBs (JumpCloud cheaper), or developer/engineering CIAM (Auth0 better fit).

      Strengths

      • Native integration with CyberArk PAM
      • Strong identity governance and access reviews
      • Risk-based authentication
      • Enterprise compliance depth
      • Works for CyberArk-anchored enterprises
      • Public company financial transparency

      Weaknesses

      • Outside CyberArk ecosystem less compelling
      • Pricing meaningful at scale
      • Sales process enterprise-only
      • Integration ecosystem narrower (~1,500)
      • UX complexity high

      Pricing tiers

      opaque
      • Identity Cloud
        Per-user; SSO + MFA
        Quote
      • Identity Security
        Per-user; risk-based auth, governance
        Quote
      • Bundled with PAM
        Custom; unified PAM + IAM
        Quote
      Watch for
      • · Implementation fee ($25K-$300K)
      • · Per-product pricing
      • · Annual price increases

      Key features

      • +SSO + MFA
      • +Identity governance
      • +Risk-based authentication
      • +Native CyberArk PAM integration
      • +Privileged session management
      • +Mobile apps
      • +1,500+ integrations
      1500+ integrations
      CyberArk PAMSalesforceMicrosoft 365AWSServiceNowWorkday HCM
      Geography
      Global; strongest in US, EU, Israel
      #7

      Duo Security (Cisco)

      MFA market leader, SSO secondary.

      Founded 2010 · Ann Arbor, MI · public · 10–100,000+ employees
      G2 4.5 (2,840)
      Capterra 4.7
      From $0 + $0 /mo + /employee
      ● Transparent pricing
      Visit Duo Security (Cisco)

      Duo Security is the MFA market leader, acquired by Cisco in 2018 for $2.4B. The product's strengths: cleanest MFA UX in category, strong device trust capabilities (Duo Healthcheck), and Cisco-network integration. Best fit for organizations where MFA is the primary need and SSO is secondary, or Cisco-anchored networks. Trade-offs: SSO depth thinner than Okta/Entra, integration ecosystem narrower, and post-Cisco product velocity has slowed.

      Best for

      Organizations where MFA is the primary need and SSO is secondary, or Cisco-network-anchored enterprises wanting native MFA + device trust.

      Worst for

      Best-of-breed workforce IAM (Okta/Entra better for SSO depth), customer IAM (Auth0 better), or SMBs needing all-in-one (JumpCloud better).

      Strengths

      • MFA market leader
      • Cleanest MFA UX in category
      • Device trust capabilities (Duo Healthcheck)
      • Cisco network integration
      • Built for MFA-first deployments

      Weaknesses

      • SSO depth thinner than Okta/Entra
      • Integration ecosystem narrower (~500)
      • Post-Cisco product velocity slowed
      • Identity governance limited
      • Support depends on tier

      Pricing tiers

      public
      • Free
        Up to 10 users; basic MFA
        $0+$0 /mo +/emp
      • Essentials
        Per user; basic MFA + SSO
        $3 /mo
      • Advantage
        Per user; device trust, advanced policies
        $6 /mo
      • Premier
        Per user; full identity platform
        $9 /mo
      Watch for
      • · Annual billing for discount
      • · Premium support add-on

      Key features

      • +MFA (push, TOTP, hardware tokens)
      • +Device trust (Duo Healthcheck)
      • +SSO (~500 apps)
      • +Adaptive policies
      • +Passwordless authentication
      • +Mobile apps
      • +Cisco network integration
      500+ integrations
      Microsoft 365SalesforceAWSGoogle WorkspaceCisco AnyConnectSlack
      Geography
      Global; strongest in US, EU, UK
      #8

      OneLogin (One Identity)

      Lower-cost Okta alternative for mid-market.

      Founded 2009 · San Francisco, CA · private · 50–10,000 employees
      G2 4.4 (1,380)
      Capterra 4.3
      From $4 /mo
      ● Transparent pricing
      Visit OneLogin (One Identity)

      OneLogin is the lower-cost Okta alternative for mid-market organizations. Acquired by One Identity (Quest Software) in 2021. The product's strengths: per-user pricing meaningfully cheaper than Okta, mature SSO and provisioning, and strong fit for mid-market not on Microsoft. Trade-offs: post-One Identity acquisition product velocity has slowed, integration ecosystem narrower than Okta (~5,000 vs 7,000), and customer support quality has declined.

      Best for

      Mid-market organizations (200-2,000 employees) wanting lower-cost workforce IAM than Okta with sufficient depth for non-Microsoft shops.

      Worst for

      Microsoft 365-anchored (Entra better), enterprise needing deepest features (Okta/Ping better), or modern engineering teams needing CIAM (Auth0 better).

      Strengths

      • Lower-cost Okta alternative
      • Mature SSO and provisioning
      • Made for mid-market non-Microsoft
      • Established 2009; broad customer base
      • OneLogin Vigilance AI for risk detection

      Weaknesses

      • Post-One Identity product velocity slowed
      • Integration ecosystem narrower (~5,000 vs 7,000)
      • Customer support quality declined
      • Innovation pace slower than Okta/Entra
      • AI features less mature

      Pricing tiers

      public
      • Advanced
        Per user; SSO + MFA
        $4 /mo
      • Professional
        Per user; provisioning, advanced MFA
        $8 /mo
      • Bundle
        Custom; full platform
        Quote
      Watch for
      • · Per-product pricing
      • · Annual billing for discount
      • · Implementation fee

      Key features

      • +SSO (~5,000 pre-built apps)
      • +Adaptive MFA
      • +SCIM provisioning
      • +OneLogin Vigilance AI (risk detection)
      • +Mobile apps
      • +5,000+ integrations
      5000+ integrations
      SalesforceMicrosoft 365Google WorkspaceAWSSlackWorkday HCM
      Geography
      Global; strongest in US, EU, UK
      #9

      Beyond Identity

      Passwordless-first IAM with FIDO2/passkey-native architecture.

      Founded 2020 · New York, NY · private · 100–10,000 employees
      G2 4.5 (380)
      Capterra 4.6
      Custom quote
      ○ Sales call required
      Visit Beyond Identity

      Beyond Identity is the passwordless-first IAM platform, founded 2020 by Jim Clark (Netscape) and Tom (Pat) Jermoluk (@Home). The product's strengths: passkey/FIDO2-native architecture (no passwords ever), strong device-bound credentials, and modern UX. Best fit for security-forward organizations eliminating passwords entirely. Trade-offs: Lighter market share than Okta/Entra, integration ecosystem narrower (~150), and pricing meaningful at scale.

      Best for

      Security-forward organizations (200-5,000 employees) eliminating passwords entirely with passkey/FIDO2-native architecture.

      Worst for

      Microsoft-anchored shops (Entra includes passkey support free), organizations not ready for passwordless (Okta/Entra better), or SMBs (JumpCloud cheaper).

      Strengths

      • Passkey/FIDO2-native architecture (no passwords)
      • Device-bound credentials (anti-phishing)
      • Modern UX
      • Right call for security-forward orgs
      • Founder-led with strong VC backing

      Weaknesses

      • Narrower customer base than Okta/Entra
      • Integration ecosystem narrower (~150)
      • Pricing meaningful at scale
      • Newer product (2020); some growing pains
      • Less mature governance features

      Pricing tiers

      opaque
      • Workforce Secure SSO
        ~$8-$15/user/mo typical
        Quote
      • Workforce Secure DevOps
        Adds developer authentication
        Quote
      • Workforce Secure Customers
        Adds customer IAM
        Quote
      Watch for
      • · Per-product pricing
      • · Implementation fee ($5K-$25K)

      Key features

      • +Passkey/FIDO2-native authentication
      • +Device-bound credentials
      • +Adaptive policies
      • +Risk scoring
      • +Mobile apps
      • +150+ integrations
      150+ integrations
      Microsoft 365OktaSalesforceAWSGitHub
      Geography
      Global; strongest in US, UK
      #10

      Rippling SSO

      Bundled with Rippling HRIS, default for Rippling-committed SMBs.

      Founded 2016 · San Francisco, CA · private · 10–500 employees
      G2 4.6 (580)
      Capterra 4.6
      Custom quote
      ○ Sales call required
      Visit Rippling SSO

      Rippling SSO is bundled with Rippling HRIS (covered separately in our Top 10 HRIS ranking) and Rippling Payroll (in our Top 10 Payroll Software ranking). The product's primary advantage: unified employee + identity lifecycle (employee onboarding in HRIS automatically provisions SSO + apps), making it the default for Rippling-committed SMBs (10-500 employees). Trade-offs: outside the Rippling ecosystem the product is significantly weaker, integration ecosystem narrower than Okta (~600), and standalone use case rare.

      Best for

      SMBs (10-500 employees) already on Rippling HRIS wanting unified employee + identity lifecycle (HRIS-driven SSO provisioning).

      Worst for

      Non-Rippling organizations (Okta/Entra better), enterprise (Okta/Entra/Ping better), or customer IAM (Auth0 better fit).

      Strengths

      • Unified employee + identity lifecycle with Rippling HRIS
      • Default for Rippling-committed SMBs
      • Native HRIS-driven provisioning
      • Fits 10-500 employee Rippling shops
      • Modern UX

      Weaknesses

      • Outside Rippling ecosystem significantly weaker
      • Integration ecosystem narrower (~600)
      • Standalone use case rare
      • Identity governance features limited
      • Less penetration than Okta/Entra

      Pricing tiers

      opaque
      • Rippling SSO
        $8/user/mo typical (bundled with Rippling)
        Quote
      Watch for
      • · Bundled with Rippling HRIS subscription
      • · Per-product pricing within Rippling

      Key features

      • +SSO (~600 pre-built apps)
      • +MFA
      • +Native HRIS-driven provisioning
      • +Conditional Access policies
      • +Mobile apps
      • +Tight Rippling HRIS integration
      600+ integrations
      Rippling HRISSalesforceMicrosoft 365Google WorkspaceAWSSlack
      Geography
      Primarily US; growing international
      Buying guide

      7 steps to pick the right identity & access management (iam) / sso

      1. 1
        1. Audit your existing Microsoft footprint

        On Microsoft 365 E3 or E5? → Microsoft Entra ID is essentially free (bundled). Don't pay for Okta/Ping if Entra covers the use case. Outside Microsoft? → Okta/JumpCloud/OneLogin.

      2. 2
        2. Distinguish workforce IAM from CIAM

        Employees accessing company apps? → Workforce IAM (Okta WIC, Entra, JumpCloud). End users using your product? → CIAM (Auth0, Okta CIC). Both use cases? → Run both products.

      3. 3
        3. Plan HRIS-IAM integration

        Modern setups have HRIS as the source of truth. Workday HCM → Okta/Entra/Ping via SCIM. BambooHR → Okta/Entra via SCIM. Rippling HRIS → Rippling SSO native. Verify your specific HRIS-IAM integration before signing.

      4. 4
        4. Match scale to product tier

        SMB (10-100 employees): JumpCloud, Rippling SSO, Entra Free. Mid-market (100-1,000): Okta SSO+MFA, OneLogin, Entra P1. Enterprise (1,000+): Okta full platform, Entra P2, Ping bundles, CyberArk Identity.

      5. 5
        5. Demand passkey support

        Passkeys (FIDO2) are now table-stakes. Verify the IAM supports passkey enrollment and authentication. If gated behind premium tiers, that's a red flag, consider Beyond Identity, Microsoft Entra, or modern Okta tiers.

      6. 6
        6. Plan MFA rollout as change management

        MFA enrollment is the biggest user friction. Plan a phased rollout, IT first, then early adopters, then mandatory. Most orgs see 60-90 days from MFA decision to full rollout. Auto-enrollment via HRIS lifecycle helps.

      7. 7
        7. Negotiate at enterprise scale

        Okta, Ping, CyberArk all have flexible enterprise pricing. Annual contract negotiation typical 15-30% discount at 1,000+ users. Multi-year locks common. Write breach notification SLAs into the contract.

      Frequently asked questions

      The questions buyers actually ask before they sign a identity & access management (iam) / sso contract.

      Okta vs Microsoft Entra ID, which one?
      Microsoft Entra ID if you're on Microsoft 365 E3 or E5, Entra is bundled at no extra cost, which is the single biggest economic lever in IAM. Okta if you're a non-Microsoft enterprise needing the deepest integration ecosystem (7,000+ apps vs Entra ~3,000). For Microsoft-anchored shops, Entra usually wins on TCO; for best-of-breed integration depth, Okta usually wins. Both are credible at enterprise scale.
      How does this differ from your SIEM ranking?
      Our Top 10 SIEM Software ranking covers log aggregation and security event monitoring (Splunk, Sentinel, etc.). This IAM ranking covers identity provisioning and authentication (who can access what). Both feed each other, IAM events flow into SIEM, SIEM detection rules trigger IAM responses. Most enterprises run both. Microsoft Sentinel + Microsoft Entra ID is a common combo.
      How much should I budget for IAM?
      SMB on M365 E3+ (1-100 employees): $0 incremental (Entra bundled). SMB without M365: $11-$24/user/mo (JumpCloud Core to Platform). Mid-market (100-1,000 employees): $4-$15/user/mo (Okta SSO+MFA, OneLogin Pro). Enterprise (1,000+ employees): $15-$30/user/mo (Okta full platform, Ping bundles, CyberArk). Customer IAM (Auth0): per-MAU scaling.
      How long does IAM implementation take?
      JumpCloud, Duo: 1-2 weeks. Okta SSO basic: 4-8 weeks. Okta full platform: 12-16 weeks. Microsoft Entra ID: 6-12 weeks (often coupled with M365 deployment). Ping Identity, CyberArk: 12-32 weeks (enterprise). Auth0: 1-4 weeks (engineering team). Plan change management, user MFA enrollment is the biggest bottleneck.
      What about passwordless and passkeys in 2026?
      Passkeys (FIDO2) are now table-stakes in IAM 2026: (1) Microsoft Entra ID, full passkey support free with M365. (2) Okta, passkey support, free in Workforce Identity. (3) Beyond Identity, passwordless-first architecture. (4) Auth0, passkey support. Vendors that gate passkeys behind premium tiers (some legacy IAM) are losing share. If your IAM doesn't support passkeys, plan a migration.
      Should I pick best-of-breed or bundled IAM?
      Best-of-breed (Okta separate, Auth0 separate, Duo separate): better when you're heavy in non-Microsoft apps and want depth in each module. Bundled (Microsoft Entra, Rippling SSO, JumpCloud Platform): better when you want unified billing and lifecycle. Most mid-market lands on bundled (Entra for M365 shops, Rippling for Rippling-anchored, JumpCloud for SMB without M365).
      How do IAM breaches affect vendor selection?
      The Okta 2022 Lapsus$ breach and 2023 support breach reset trust expectations across the category. After-action: (1) Verify the vendor's breach disclosure history. (2) Require breach notification SLAs in the contract. (3) Run quarterly access reviews regardless of vendor. (4) Don't rely on the IAM vendor as your only line of defense, combine with EDR, SIEM, and conditional access policies.
      How does this overlap with HRIS for employee provisioning?
      Modern HRIS (Workday, BambooHR, Rippling) drives IAM provisioning via SCIM. When an employee is hired in HRIS, the IAM auto-creates the SSO account. When terminated, IAM auto-deprovisions. Rippling SSO is bundled with Rippling HRIS (we use distinct product IDs `rippling-sso` and `rippling-hris`). Workday Recruiting (in Top 10 ATS) and Workday HCM (in Top 10 HRIS) drive provisioning to Okta/Entra.

      Glossary

      IAM
      Identity & Access Management. Manages who (identity) can access what (access) under what conditions.
      SSO
      Single Sign-On. One login provides access to multiple apps via SAML, OIDC, or OAuth protocols.
      MFA
      Multi-Factor Authentication. Requires two or more verification methods (knowledge, possession, biometric).
      CIAM
      Customer IAM. Identity for end users of your products (vs workforce IAM for employees). Auth0 leads this.
      SCIM
      System for Cross-domain Identity Management. Standard for auto-provisioning user accounts to apps. Critical for HRIS-IAM integration.
      Passkey / FIDO2
      Passwordless authentication using device-bound credentials. Replaces passwords entirely. Now table-stakes in 2026.
      Conditional Access
      Policies that grant or block access based on user, device, location, risk score. Microsoft Entra leads.
      Identity Governance (IGA)
      Compliance-grade access reviews, certifications, and lifecycle workflows. Often a separate module/product.
      Federation
      Trust relationship between two identity systems (e.g. your IAM and a partner's IAM) so users can SSO across boundaries.
      PAM
      Privileged Access Management. Specialized IAM for admin/root accounts. CyberArk is the PAM leader; covered as separate category.

      Final word

      See the full intelligence profile for any product on this page, including verified pricing, vendor trust scores, and review patterns. Browse the Identity & Access Management (IAM) / SSO category page →

      Last updated 2026-05-08. Pricing data is reverified quarterly. Found something inaccurate? Tell us.