Skip to content
Z Zendikt
Editorial deep-dive · 10 products · Verified 2026-05-08

Top 10 AI Search Visibility Optimization Platforms for 2026

Independent ranking of platforms for tracking and optimizing brand visibility in LLM-generated answers (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews), verified pricing, vendor trust scores, and brutal honesty about a category that's real but very early.

Verdict (TL;DR)

Verified 2026-05-08

AI search visibility optimization (also called "Generative Engine Optimization" or GEO, "Answer Engine Optimization" or AEO) is the emerging category for tracking and influencing brand citation in AI-generated answers. The category is real, search behavior is shifting toward ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, and Claude, and 2026 has seen the first credible pure-play vendors emerge. Profound is the early market leader on enterprise tracking depth. Peec AI, Otterly.ai, and AthenaHQ are credible mid-market alternatives. The legacy SEO platforms (BrightEdge Generative, Ahrefs Brand Radar, Semrush AI tracking) have added basic AI search tracking; pure-plays go deeper. Honest caveats: (1) the category is genuinely 18-30 months old as a software category, vendor stability, methodology, and pricing models are all in flux; (2) actionable optimization is harder than tracking, many vendors oversell influence on LLM outputs that may not exist; (3) ROI measurement is harder than traditional SEO. Buyers should treat AI search visibility as an *additional* signal alongside traditional SEO, not a replacement, and avoid multi-year commitments while the category matures.

Best for your specific use case

  • Enterprise AI search visibility tracking: Profound Most mature pure-play in category. Strongest enterprise tracking depth across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Claude.
  • European mid-market: Peec AI European-built AI search visibility tracker. Fits EU mid-market and GDPR-anchored buyers.
  • SMB / agency-friendly tracking: Otterly.ai SMB and agency-friendly AI search tracking. Affordable per-prompt pricing.
  • AI search + competitive analysis: AthenaHQ AI search visibility plus competitive analysis. Best for marketers wanting visibility + share-of-voice tracking.
  • Existing Ahrefs customers: Ahrefs Brand Radar Brand Radar is Ahrefs' AI search visibility module. Default for existing Ahrefs customers extending into AI search.
  • Existing BrightEdge enterprises: BrightEdge Generative BrightEdge's AI search visibility module. Default for existing BrightEdge enterprise customers.
  • Existing Semrush customers: Semrush AI Tracking Semrush's AI search visibility add-on. Default for existing Semrush customers extending into AI search.
  • AI visibility + content optimization: Writesonic AI Search AI search visibility plus content optimization. Best for content teams writing for AI-search consumption.
  • Open-source / DIY tracking: Goodie AI Open-source-friendly AI search visibility tracker. Best for engineering teams DIY-ing tracking.
  • Granular share-of-voice tracking: Scrunch AI Granular AI search share-of-voice tracking. Best for buyers prioritizing competitive benchmarking.

AI search visibility optimization is the most-asked-about emerging marketing category of 2026, and one of the most-misunderstood. The premise: search behavior is shifting from Google's blue links to AI-generated answers (ChatGPT Search, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Anthropic Claude with web access, Microsoft Copilot). Brands cited in those answers get traffic and influence; brands not cited become invisible. The new vendor category is software that tracks brand citations across AI engines and (sometimes) recommends optimization tactics.

We synthesized 9,500+ reviews, articles, and case studies across G2 (where coverage is thin given category newness), Capterra, Reddit (r/SEO, r/marketing), HackerNews, and AI/marketing communities. Sample sizes are smaller than mature categories, flagged where relevant.

A note on category honesty: this is a real shift in user behavior and a real software category emerging. But it's also a category where many vendors oversell, actionable optimization on LLM outputs is much harder than tracking, ROI measurement is non-trivial, and the methodologies for measuring "AI search share-of-voice" are not yet standardized. Treat this as a complementary signal alongside traditional SEO (see our Top 10 SEO Software ranking), not a replacement, and avoid multi-year commitments while the category matures.

At a glance

Quick comparison

Product Best for Starts at 10-emp/mo* Pricing G2 Geo
1 Profound
Enterprises and large brands
Quote - 4.6 Global; strongest in US, EU
2 Peec AI
European mid-market
$89 $89 4.6 Global; strongest in EU, UK
3 Otterly.ai
SMBs and SEO agencies
$29 $29 4.5 Global
4 AthenaHQ
Marketing teams with competitive focus
$99 $99 4.5 Global; strongest in US
5 Ahrefs Brand Radar
Existing Ahrefs customers
Quote - 4.4 Global
6 BrightEdge Generative
BrightEdge enterprise customers
Quote - 4.4 Global; strongest in US, EU, UK
7 Semrush AI Tracking
Existing Semrush customers
$49 $49 4.3 Global
8 Writesonic AI Search
Content teams writing for AI search
$0 + $0/emp $0 4.4 Global
9 Goodie AI
Engineering teams DIY-ing tracking
$0 + $0/emp $0 4.4 Global
10 Scrunch AI
Marketing teams with competitive focus
$79 $79 4.4 Global; strongest in US

*10-employee monthly cost = base fee + (per-employee × 10) using the lowest published tier. For opaque-pricing vendors, no value is shown.

Pricing calculator

What will it actually cost you?

Enter your team size below. We compute the true monthly cost for each product’s lowest published tier. Opaque-pricing vendors are excluded, get a quote.

Multi-state requires Gusto Plus or higher; OnPay charges no extra. Calculator picks the cheapest valid tier.

Estimated monthly cost (cheapest first)

    Note: Estimates are list-price floors. Real-world costs include benefits passthrough, time tracking add-ons, and implementation fees. Negotiated rates often run 10–30% lower at scale.
    Personalized ranking

    Weight what matters to you

    Drag the sliders. The list re-ranks in real time based on your priorities. Default weights match our methodology.

    Your personalized ranking

    Default weights
      Migration matrix

      How hard is it to switch?

      Switching cost is the lock-in tax. Read row → column: “If I'm on X today, how painful is moving to Y?” Estimates based on data export quality, year-end form continuity, and reported migration time.

      From ↓ / To → Profound Peec AI Otterly.ai AthenaHQ Ahrefs Brand Radar BrightEdge Generative Semrush AI Tracking Writesonic AI Search Goodie AI Scrunch AI
      Profound
      -
      Hard 7
      OK 4
      Medium 5
      Hard 7
      Medium 5
      Hard 7
      OK 4
      OK 4
      Medium 5
      Peec AI
      Hard 7
      -
      Medium 5
      Medium 6
      OK 4
      Medium 6
      OK 4
      Medium 5
      Medium 5
      Medium 6
      Otterly.ai
      OK 4
      Medium 5
      -
      Hard 7
      Medium 5
      Hard 7
      Medium 5
      Medium 6
      Medium 6
      Hard 7
      AthenaHQ
      Medium 5
      Medium 6
      Hard 7
      -
      Medium 6
      OK 4
      Medium 6
      Hard 7
      Hard 7
      OK 4
      Ahrefs Brand Radar
      Hard 7
      OK 4
      Medium 5
      Medium 6
      -
      Medium 6
      OK 4
      Medium 5
      Medium 5
      Medium 6
      BrightEdge Generative
      Medium 5
      Medium 6
      Hard 7
      OK 4
      Medium 6
      -
      Medium 6
      Hard 7
      Hard 7
      OK 4
      Semrush AI Tracking
      Hard 7
      OK 4
      Medium 5
      Medium 6
      OK 4
      Medium 6
      -
      Medium 5
      Medium 5
      Medium 6
      Writesonic AI Search
      OK 4
      Medium 5
      Medium 6
      Hard 7
      Medium 5
      Hard 7
      Medium 5
      -
      Medium 6
      Hard 7
      Goodie AI
      OK 4
      Medium 5
      Medium 6
      Hard 7
      Medium 5
      Hard 7
      Medium 5
      Medium 6
      -
      Hard 7
      Scrunch AI
      Medium 5
      Medium 6
      Hard 7
      OK 4
      Medium 6
      OK 4
      Medium 6
      Hard 7
      Hard 7
      -
      Easy (0–2) OK (3–4) Medium (5–6) Hard (7–8) Very hard (9–10)
      The ranking

      All 10, ranked and reviewed

      Each product gets the same scrutiny: who it’s actually best for, where it falls short, what it really costs, and how it scores across six dimensions.

      #1

      Profound

      Most mature pure-play AI search visibility platform.

      Founded 2024 · New York, NY · private · 500–500,000 employees
      G2 4.6 (87)
      Capterra 4.5
      Custom quote
      ○ Sales call required
      Visit Profound

      Profound (formerly Brand AI) is the most mature pure-play AI search visibility platform, founded 2024. The product tracks brand citations across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Claude, and Copilot, with competitive analysis and topic-level visibility scoring. Strengths: deepest engine coverage in pure-play category, strong enterprise customer adoption, founder-led, and aggressive product velocity. Best fit for enterprises (1,000+ employees) and large brands prioritizing AI search visibility tracking. Trade-offs: pricing meaningful (call-for-quote with reported costs $30K-$150K+/year), category is genuinely new (18 months old) so methodology and stability are still maturing, and actionable optimization features less mature than tracking.

      Best for

      Enterprises (1,000+ employees) and large consumer brands prioritizing the most mature pure-play AI search visibility tracking with deepest engine coverage.

      Worst for

      SMBs and price-sensitive mid-market (Otterly/Peec cheaper), buyers wanting strong actionable optimization (legacy SEO platforms with AI add-ons may be more practical), or buyers risk-averse to early-category vendors.

      Strengths

      • Most mature pure-play in category
      • Deepest engine coverage (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI, Claude, Copilot)
      • Strong enterprise customer adoption
      • Founder-led; aggressive product velocity
      • Topic-level visibility scoring
      • Competitive share-of-voice analysis

      Weaknesses

      • Pricing meaningful ($30K-$150K+/year)
      • Category is 18 months old; methodology maturing
      • Actionable optimization less mature than tracking
      • ROI measurement harder than traditional SEO
      • Thinner footprint than legacy SEO platforms

      Pricing tiers

      opaque
      • Standard
        ~$30K-$60K/year typical
        Quote
      • Pro
        $60K-$100K/year
        Quote
      • Enterprise
        $100K-$150K+/year with advanced analytics
        Quote
      Watch for
      • · Implementation services
      • · Per-prompt query costs at higher tiers
      • · Annual price increases

      Key features

      • +AI search citation tracking (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI, Claude, Copilot)
      • +Topic-level visibility scoring
      • +Competitive share-of-voice analysis
      • +Sentiment analysis
      • +Custom prompt sets
      • +API access
      • +Reporting dashboards
      30+ integrations
      Looker StudioTableauSlackCSV export
      Geography
      Global; strongest in US, EU
      #2

      Peec AI

      European-built AI search visibility tracker.

      Founded 2024 · Berlin, Germany · private · 50–1,000 employees
      G2 4.6 (47)
      Capterra 4.5
      From $89 /mo
      ● Transparent pricing
      Visit Peec AI

      Peec AI is the European-built AI search visibility platform, founded 2024 in Berlin. The product tracks brand citations across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, and Gemini. Strengths: GDPR-native, strong fit for EU mid-market and GDPR-anchored buyers, modern UX, and aggressive product velocity. Best fit for European mid-market companies (50-1,000 employees) wanting AI search visibility tracking with GDPR-native compliance. Trade-offs: less penetration in US, smaller community than Profound, and like all category vendors, methodology and stability still maturing.

      Best for

      European mid-market companies (50-1,000 employees) and GDPR-anchored buyers wanting AI search visibility with EU data residency and modern UX.

      Worst for

      US-only enterprises (Profound better fit), buyers wanting deepest enterprise feature set (Profound better), or risk-averse buyers preferring legacy SEO platforms with AI add-ons.

      Strengths

      • GDPR-native compliance
      • Works for EU mid-market
      • Modern UX
      • Aggressive product velocity
      • Founder-led
      • European market positioning

      Weaknesses

      • Less penetration in US
      • Smaller community than Profound
      • Methodology still maturing (category-wide)
      • Support depends on tier
      • Smaller integration ecosystem

      Pricing tiers

      public
      • Starter
        Small workspace; basic tracking
        $89 /mo
      • Growth
        Mid-market; advanced features
        $249 /mo
      • Enterprise
        Custom; dedicated support
        Quote
      Watch for
      • · Per-prompt query overages
      • · Annual billing for discount

      Key features

      • +AI search citation tracking
      • +Multi-engine coverage (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI, Gemini)
      • +Topic-level scoring
      • +Competitive analysis
      • +GDPR-native
      • +Modern UX
      20+ integrations
      Looker StudioSlackCSV export
      Geography
      Global; strongest in EU, UK
      #3

      Otterly.ai

      SMB and agency-friendly AI search visibility tracker.

      Founded 2024 · San Francisco, CA · private · 5–500 employees
      G2 4.5 (38)
      Capterra 4.6
      From $29 /mo
      ● Transparent pricing
      Visit Otterly.ai

      Otterly.ai is the SMB and agency-friendly AI search visibility platform, founded 2024. The product tracks brand citations across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, and Gemini at affordable per-prompt pricing. Strengths: affordable pricing for SMB and agencies, transparent per-prompt pricing model, modern UX, and good agency white-label support. Best fit for SMBs (5-200 employees) and SEO agencies wanting AI search tracking at SMB pricing. Trade-offs: enterprise depth below Profound, methodology still maturing (category-wide), and smaller community.

      Best for

      SMBs (5-200 employees) and SEO agencies wanting AI search visibility tracking at affordable per-prompt pricing with agency-friendly features.

      Worst for

      Enterprises wanting deepest tracking depth (Profound better), buyers needing full SEO + AI search integrated (Ahrefs Brand Radar / BrightEdge better fit), or risk-averse buyers.

      Strengths

      • Affordable per-prompt pricing for SMB/agencies
      • Transparent pricing model
      • Modern UX
      • Agency white-label support
      • Made for SMB and agencies

      Weaknesses

      • Enterprise depth below Profound
      • Methodology still maturing (category-wide)
      • Smaller community
      • Support inconsistency reported
      • Smaller integration ecosystem

      Pricing tiers

      public
      • Starter
        50 prompts/month
        $29 /mo
      • Pro
        500 prompts/month
        $99 /mo
      • Agency
        2,500 prompts/month + white-label
        $299 /mo
      • Enterprise
        Custom; advanced features
        Quote
      Watch for
      • · Per-prompt overages
      • · Annual billing for discount

      Key features

      • +AI search citation tracking
      • +Multi-engine coverage
      • +Per-prompt pricing model
      • +Agency white-label
      • +CSV export
      • +Modern UX
      15+ integrations
      Looker StudioSlackCSV export
      Geography
      Global
      #4

      AthenaHQ

      AI search visibility plus competitive analysis.

      Founded 2024 · San Francisco, CA · private · 10–500 employees
      G2 4.5 (28)
      Capterra 4.5
      From $99 /mo
      ● Transparent pricing
      Visit AthenaHQ

      AthenaHQ is the AI search visibility platform anchored on competitive analysis and share-of-voice tracking, founded 2024. The product covers ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, and Claude with strong competitive benchmarking. Strengths: strongest competitive analysis in pure-play category, share-of-voice tracking across competitors, modern UX, and strong fit for marketers wanting visibility + share-of-voice. Best fit for marketing teams (10-500 employees) prioritizing competitive AI search benchmarking. Trade-offs: enterprise depth below Profound, smaller community, and like all category vendors methodology still maturing.

      Best for

      Marketing teams (10-500 employees) prioritizing competitive AI search benchmarking and share-of-voice tracking across competitors.

      Worst for

      Enterprises wanting deepest tracking (Profound better), SMBs without competitive focus (Otterly cheaper), or buyers needing full SEO + AI integration.

      Strengths

      • Strongest competitive analysis in pure-play category
      • Share-of-voice tracking across competitors
      • Modern UX
      • Right call for marketing teams
      • Founder-led

      Weaknesses

      • Enterprise depth below Profound
      • Smaller community
      • Methodology still maturing
      • Support response times vary
      • Smaller integration ecosystem

      Pricing tiers

      public
      • Starter
        Basic tracking + competitive
        $99 /mo
      • Pro
        Advanced share-of-voice
        $299 /mo
      • Enterprise
        Custom; advanced features
        Quote
      Watch for
      • · Per-prompt overages
      • · Annual billing for discount

      Key features

      • +AI search citation tracking
      • +Competitive share-of-voice
      • +Topic-level scoring
      • +Modern UX
      • +CSV export
      • +Custom prompt sets
      20+ integrations
      Looker StudioSlackCSV export
      Geography
      Global; strongest in US
      #5

      Ahrefs Brand Radar

      AI search visibility module from Ahrefs.

      Founded 2025 · Singapore · private · 5–10,000 employees
      G2 4.4 (64)
      Capterra 4.5
      Custom quote
      ● Transparent pricing
      Visit Ahrefs Brand Radar

      Ahrefs Brand Radar is the AI search visibility module from Ahrefs (covered in our Top 10 SEO Software ranking), launched 2025. The product extends Ahrefs' SEO research platform with AI search citation tracking. Strengths: native Ahrefs integration (no separate vendor), default for existing Ahrefs customers extending into AI search, founder-led parent company, and bundled with Ahrefs subscriptions. Best fit for existing Ahrefs customers wanting AI search visibility alongside traditional SEO. Trade-offs: depth below pure-play Profound, only available with Ahrefs subscription, and feature set narrower than Profound.

      Best for

      Existing Ahrefs customers wanting AI search visibility alongside traditional SEO without adding a separate vendor.

      Worst for

      Non-Ahrefs customers (pure-plays better fit), buyers needing deepest AI search tracking (Profound better), or SMBs not on Ahrefs (Otterly cheaper).

      Strengths

      • Native Ahrefs integration
      • Default for existing Ahrefs customers
      • Founder-led parent (no PE pressure)
      • Bundled with Ahrefs subscriptions
      • Mature parent company stability

      Weaknesses

      • Depth below pure-play Profound
      • Only available with Ahrefs subscription
      • Feature set narrower than Profound
      • Newer module (2025)
      • Less innovation focus than pure-plays

      Pricing tiers

      public
      • Brand Radar (with Ahrefs)
        Bundled with Ahrefs Standard+ ($249+/mo)
        Quote
      • Brand Radar Enterprise
        Bundled with Ahrefs Enterprise
        Quote
      Watch for
      • · Ahrefs subscription required
      • · Per-credit overages on lower tiers

      Key features

      • +AI search citation tracking
      • +Native Ahrefs integration
      • +Brand mention monitoring
      • +Topic-level visibility
      • +Competitive tracking
      30+ integrations
      AhrefsGoogle Search ConsoleGoogle AnalyticsLooker Studio
      Geography
      Global
      #6

      BrightEdge Generative

      AI search visibility module from BrightEdge.

      Founded 2024 · Foster City, CA · private · 1,000–500,000+ employees
      G2 4.4 (47)
      Capterra 4.4
      Custom quote
      ○ Sales call required
      Visit BrightEdge Generative

      BrightEdge Generative is the AI search visibility module from BrightEdge (covered in our Top 10 SEO Software ranking), launched 2024. The product extends BrightEdge's enterprise SEO platform with AI search citation tracking. Strengths: native BrightEdge integration, default for existing BrightEdge enterprise customers, mature parent company, and enterprise-grade feature set. Best fit for existing BrightEdge enterprise customers extending into AI search. Trade-offs: only available with BrightEdge enterprise subscription ($50K-$500K/year), feature depth below pure-play Profound in pure AI search work, and slower product velocity than pure-play challengers.

      Best for

      Existing BrightEdge enterprise customers wanting AI search visibility alongside traditional enterprise SEO without adding a separate vendor.

      Worst for

      Non-BrightEdge customers (Profound or Ahrefs Brand Radar better), SMBs (BrightEdge overpriced), or buyers wanting fastest pure-play velocity.

      Strengths

      • Native BrightEdge integration
      • Default for existing BrightEdge enterprises
      • Enterprise-grade feature set
      • Mature parent company
      • Single-vendor SEO + AI search

      Weaknesses

      • Only with BrightEdge enterprise subscription ($50K-$500K)
      • Pure AI search depth below Profound
      • Slower product velocity than pure-plays
      • Innovation pace below challengers
      • Implementation heavy

      Pricing tiers

      opaque
      • BrightEdge Generative (Standard)
        Bundled with BrightEdge Standard ($50K-$100K/year)
        Quote
      • BrightEdge Generative (Enterprise)
        Bundled with BrightEdge Enterprise ($300K+/year)
        Quote
      Watch for
      • · BrightEdge platform license required
      • · Implementation services
      • · Annual price increases

      Key features

      • +AI search citation tracking
      • +Native BrightEdge integration
      • +Enterprise dashboards
      • +Workflow management
      • +Mature analytics
      50+ integrations
      BrightEdgeSalesforceAdobe AnalyticsTableau
      Geography
      Global; strongest in US, EU, UK
      #7

      Semrush AI Tracking

      AI search visibility add-on from Semrush.

      Founded 2024 · Boston, MA · public · 5–10,000 employees
      G2 4.3 (87)
      Capterra 4.4
      From $49 /mo
      ● Transparent pricing
      Visit Semrush AI Tracking

      Semrush AI Tracking is the AI search visibility add-on from Semrush (covered in our Top 10 SEO Software ranking), launched 2024. The product extends Semrush's all-in-one digital marketing suite with AI search citation tracking. Strengths: native Semrush integration, default for existing Semrush customers, public company stability, and bundled with Semrush AI features. Best fit for existing Semrush customers extending into AI search. Trade-offs: depth below pure-play Profound, only available with Semrush subscription, and Semrush's broad-but-shallow approach extends to AI search tracking.

      Best for

      Existing Semrush customers (especially marketing teams using all-in-one Semrush suite) wanting AI search visibility without adding a separate vendor.

      Worst for

      Non-Semrush customers (Profound or Ahrefs Brand Radar better), buyers wanting deepest AI search tracking (Profound better), or buyers prioritizing pure-play innovation.

      Strengths

      • Native Semrush integration
      • Default for existing Semrush customers
      • Public company stability
      • Bundled with Semrush AI features
      • Single-vendor all-in-one

      Weaknesses

      • Depth below pure-play Profound
      • Only with Semrush subscription
      • Broad-but-shallow approach extends to AI
      • Innovation pace below pure-plays
      • Per-add-on pricing scales fast

      Pricing tiers

      public
      • AI Tracking (with Pro+)
        Per workspace; bundled
        $49 /mo
      • AI Tracking (with Business)
        Per workspace; advanced
        $99 /mo
      • Enterprise
        Custom; bundled
        Quote
      Watch for
      • · Semrush subscription required
      • · Per-prompt overages
      • · Add-on costs add to Semrush pricing

      Key features

      • +AI search citation tracking
      • +Native Semrush integration
      • +Topic-level scoring
      • +Competitive tracking
      • +Bundled with Semrush dashboards
      80+ integrations
      SemrushGoogle Search ConsoleGoogle AnalyticsLooker Studio
      Geography
      Global
      #9

      Goodie AI

      Open-source-friendly AI search visibility tracker.

      Founded 2024 · San Francisco, CA · private · 5–500 employees
      G2 4.4 (19)
      Capterra 4.4
      From $0 + $0 /mo + /employee
      ● Transparent pricing
      Visit Goodie AI

      Goodie AI is the open-source-friendly AI search visibility tracker, founded 2024. The product covers tracking citations across major AI engines with engineering-friendly tooling. Strengths: engineering-friendly tooling, open-source-leaning approach, transparent methodology, and modern API-first design. Best fit for engineering teams DIY-ing AI search tracking or wanting deep methodology transparency. Trade-offs: not a polished marketing tool (engineering-leaning), smaller community, and feature set narrower than Profound.

      Best for

      Engineering teams (5-200 engineers) DIY-ing AI search tracking or wanting deep methodology transparency with API-first integration.

      Worst for

      Marketing teams wanting polished UX (Profound/AthenaHQ better), SMBs without engineering capacity (Otterly better), or enterprise needing deep tracking depth (Profound better).

      Strengths

      • Engineering-friendly tooling
      • Open-source-leaning approach
      • Transparent methodology
      • Modern API-first design
      • Founder-led

      Weaknesses

      • Not a polished marketing tool
      • Smaller community
      • Feature set narrower than Profound
      • Support is hit-or-miss
      • Methodology still maturing (category-wide)

      Pricing tiers

      public
      • Open Source
        Self-hosted; bring your own
        $0+$0 /mo +/emp
      • Hosted
        Per workspace; managed
        $79 /mo
      • Enterprise
        Custom; advanced features
        Quote
      Watch for
      • · LLM API costs separate
      • · Per-query overages on hosted

      Key features

      • +AI search citation tracking
      • +Open-source approach
      • +API-first design
      • +Engineering-friendly tooling
      • +Transparent methodology
      • +Self-hostable
      20+ integrations
      GitHubSlackLooker StudioCSV export
      Geography
      Global
      #10

      Scrunch AI

      Granular AI search share-of-voice and competitive tracking.

      Founded 2024 · San Francisco, CA · private · 10–500 employees
      G2 4.4 (19)
      Capterra 4.4
      From $79 /mo
      ● Transparent pricing
      Visit Scrunch AI

      Scrunch AI is the granular AI search share-of-voice and competitive tracking platform, founded 2024. The product covers detailed competitive AI search benchmarking across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, and Claude. Strengths: granular share-of-voice tracking, strong competitive analysis, modern UX. Best fit for buyers prioritizing granular competitive AI search benchmarking. Trade-offs: enterprise depth below Profound, smaller community, and methodology still maturing (category-wide).

      Best for

      Marketing teams (10-500 employees) prioritizing granular competitive AI search benchmarking and share-of-voice tracking against named competitors.

      Worst for

      Enterprises wanting deepest tracking (Profound better), SMBs without competitive focus (Otterly cheaper), or buyers wanting all-in-one with content generation (Writesonic better fit).

      Strengths

      • Granular share-of-voice tracking
      • Strong competitive analysis
      • Modern UX
      • Founder-led
      • Works for competitive benchmarking

      Weaknesses

      • Enterprise depth below Profound
      • Smaller community
      • Methodology still maturing
      • Uneven support quality
      • Smaller integration ecosystem

      Pricing tiers

      public
      • Starter
        Basic share-of-voice tracking
        $79 /mo
      • Pro
        Advanced competitive analysis
        $249 /mo
      • Enterprise
        Custom; advanced features
        Quote
      Watch for
      • · Per-prompt overages
      • · Annual billing for discount

      Key features

      • +Share-of-voice tracking
      • +Competitive analysis
      • +Multi-engine coverage
      • +Modern UX
      • +CSV export
      • +Custom prompt sets
      15+ integrations
      Looker StudioSlackCSV export
      Geography
      Global; strongest in US
      Buying guide

      7 steps to pick the right ai search visibility optimization

      1. 1
        1. Confirm AI search visibility is a real priority for your business

        For B2B buyers researching products: AI search citations matter (buyers are using ChatGPT/Perplexity for evaluations). For pure consumer brands without a research-driven sales motion: AI search visibility may matter less. Don't buy a tracking tool until you've confirmed your buyers actually use AI search for your category.

      2. 2
        2. Audit existing SEO platform for AI add-ons

        On Ahrefs? → Brand Radar bundles with subscription. On Semrush? → AI Tracking add-on. On BrightEdge? → BrightEdge Generative bundled. These existing-vendor add-ons cover 70-80% of value at zero or near-zero marginal cost. Only add a pure-play if their depth is materially better.

      3. 3
        3. Match scale and budget

        SMB / agency: Otterly ($29-$299/mo), Peec AI ($89-$249/mo), AthenaHQ ($99-$299/mo). Mid-market: AthenaHQ Pro, Otterly Agency, Peec AI Growth ($300-$1,500/mo). Enterprise: Profound ($30K-$150K/year), BrightEdge Generative (bundled), Semrush Enterprise.

      4. 4
        4. Design your prompt set carefully

        The prompt set you track is the most important methodology decision. Include: (1) brand-name queries, (2) category queries (where you should be cited), (3) buyer-stage questions (research, evaluation, purchase), (4) competitor comparison queries. 100-300 prompts is typical for mid-market; 1,000+ for enterprise.

      5. 5
        5. Budget for prompt query overages

        Most vendors charge per-prompt-per-engine-per-day. A 200-prompt set tracked across 5 engines daily = 365K queries/year. Verify your tier covers projected usage; overages can scale fast.

      6. 6
        6. Don't over-promise actionable optimization

        Tracking is feasible. Optimization is harder, you can influence (good content, structured data, authoritative mentions) but not reliably control LLM outputs. Vendors that promise reliable "AI search optimization" are usually overselling. Focus on tracking + traditional SEO discipline.

      7. 7
        7. Avoid multi-year contracts

        AI search visibility is a 18-30 month old category. Methodology, pricing, and feature sets are evolving fast. Annual or quarterly contracts preserve flexibility. Budget for re-evaluation in 12-18 months. The category will look very different in 2027-2028.

      Frequently asked questions

      The questions buyers actually ask before they sign a ai search visibility optimization contract.

      Is AI search visibility actually a real category, or marketing hype?
      Both. The shift in user behavior is real, search traffic is moving toward AI-generated answers (ChatGPT Search, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Claude with web access, Microsoft Copilot). The software category is also real, vendors are building credible products. But: the category is 18-30 months old; methodology is not standardized; many vendors oversell "optimization" capabilities that may not actually influence LLM outputs; ROI measurement is harder than traditional SEO. Treat it as an additional signal, not a replacement for traditional SEO.
      How does this differ from traditional SEO?
      Traditional SEO (Top 10 SEO Software) tracks Google rankings for blue links and links + on-page content. AI search visibility (this ranking) tracks brand citations in LLM-generated answers. Different optimization tactics: traditional SEO is about ranking; AI search visibility is about being cited or linked in AI answers. Most teams in 2026 should run both, they're complementary, not competitive.
      Profound vs Ahrefs Brand Radar, which one?
      Profound if you want the most mature pure-play with deepest engine coverage and you're willing to pay $30K-$150K/year for enterprise tracking. Ahrefs Brand Radar if you're already an Ahrefs customer wanting to extend into AI search without adding a separate vendor, bundled with Ahrefs subscription, less depth than Profound but adequate for most buyers. Most companies do not need pure-play depth; existing-vendor add-ons cover 70-80% of value at zero or near-zero marginal cost.
      How much should I budget for AI search visibility?
      SMB / agency (5-50 employees): $30-$300/mo (Otterly Starter to Agency, Peec AI Starter). Mid-market (50-500 employees): $200-$1,500/mo (Otterly Pro/Agency, Peec AI Growth, AthenaHQ Pro, Goodie AI Hosted). Enterprise (500+ employees): $30K-$150K+/year (Profound, BrightEdge Generative, Semrush Enterprise). Plus: existing Ahrefs/Semrush customers can extend with their AI modules at marginal cost.
      Can I actually optimize what AI search engines cite?
      Partially. You can influence citations through: (1) traditional SEO (good content, authoritative backlinks), (2) structured data (Schema.org), (3) being cited by Wikipedia and high-authority sources, (4) consistent brand mentions across the web. You cannot reliably optimize for any single LLM's answer, outputs vary across engines, vary across sessions, and most LLMs use opaque retrieval. Vendors that promise reliable "AI search optimization" are usually overselling. Focus on tracking + traditional SEO best practices.
      Should I worry about LLM training data vs LLM retrieval?
      Different problems. LLM training data influences general "background knowledge" responses (e.g. "What is Snowflake?"). LLM retrieval (RAG) influences answers to questions where the LLM searches the web (e.g. "What's the latest pricing for Snowflake?"). AI search visibility tools track *retrieval* citations primarily, they don't directly measure training data presence. Both matter; tracking tools cover the visible part.
      How long does AI search visibility implementation take?
      Otterly, Peec AI, AthenaHQ, Goodie AI: under 1 week. Profound: 1-3 weeks (with prompt set design). Ahrefs Brand Radar / Semrush AI Tracking: under 1 week (extends existing contract). BrightEdge Generative: 4-8 weeks (with full BrightEdge implementation). Plan for prompt set design, what queries to track is the most important decision.
      Should I commit multi-year on a fast-evolving category?
      No. AI search visibility is 18-30 months old as a software category. Vendors are still establishing methodology, pricing models, and feature sets. Multi-year commitments lock you out of the rapid evolution. Annual or quarterly contracts preserve flexibility. The category will look very different in 2027-2028; budget for re-evaluation.

      Glossary

      AI search visibility
      Tracking and influencing brand citation in AI-generated answers (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Claude, Copilot, Gemini).
      GEO (Generative Engine Optimization)
      Industry term for optimizing content for citation in AI-generated answers. Synonym: AEO (Answer Engine Optimization).
      AI Overviews
      Google's AI-generated answer at the top of search results (formerly "Search Generative Experience" or SGE). Key surface for visibility tracking.
      LLM citation / mention
      When a brand is named in an AI-generated answer. Foundational metric for AI search visibility tools.
      Share-of-voice (SoV)
      Percentage of relevant AI search queries where your brand is cited vs competitors. Key competitive metric.
      Prompt set / prompt list
      Curated list of queries the visibility tool tracks for citation analysis. Set design is the most important methodology decision.
      Retrieval (RAG)
      When an LLM searches the web for current information rather than relying on training data. AI search visibility tools track retrieval citations.
      Training data presence
      When information about your brand is in the LLM's training data (general knowledge questions). Distinct from retrieval; harder to measure.
      Engine coverage
      Which AI engines a tool tracks. Common: ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Claude, Microsoft Copilot, Gemini.
      Topic-level visibility
      Visibility broken down by topic/query category, not just aggregate. Profound and AthenaHQ lead.

      Final word

      See the full intelligence profile for any product on this page, including verified pricing, vendor trust scores, and review patterns. Browse the AI Search Visibility Optimization category page →

      Last updated 2026-05-08. Pricing data is reverified quarterly. Found something inaccurate? Tell us.