Skip to content
Z Zendikt
T
Privileged Access Management (PAM) · Rank #10 of 10

Teleport review and pricing

Modern infrastructure access for engineering-led organizations.

By Teleport (Gravitational, Inc.) · Founded 2015 · Oakland, CA · private

Teleport (formerly Gravitational) is the modern infrastructure access platform: a single identity-aware proxy that fronts SSH, Kubernetes, databases, RDP, and internal web apps, issuing short-lived certificates rather than managing long-lived secrets. Series C ($80M, July 2022, ~$1.13B valuation, Kleiner Perkins-led) put it firmly in the cloud-native PAM conversation. Best fit is engineering-led organizations that want PAM ergonomics that engineers will actually use; trade-offs are that classical compliance/session-recording buyers still gravitate to CyberArk, and the company is private with a single-product focus that can be either an asset or a risk depending on portfolio context.

Visit Teleport Vendor pricing Compare to Netwrix Privilege Secure
Best for

Engineering-led organizations (any size) that want PAM ergonomics engineers will actually use, particularly for cloud-native infrastructure access across SSH, Kubernetes, and databases.

Worst for

Classical compliance-led PAM buyers anchored in session recording for Windows admin sessions (CyberArk or BeyondTrust better), or portfolio buyers consolidating multiple modules with one vendor.

Vendor Trust Score

Is Teleport a trustworthy vendor?

8.2/10
High trust
Pricing transparency
Published rates; no hidden fees
7.0
Contract fairness
Reasonable terms; no auto-renew traps
8.0
Incident response
How they handle outages and breaches
8.5
Post-acquisition behavior
Customer treatment after M&A or PE
8.5
Executive stability
Leadership churn over 24 months
8.5
Roadmap honesty
Public commitments held
8.5
Trust signal log
  • 2022-07-13
    Series C closed at $80M, $1.13B valuation, Kleiner Perkins-led
    Confirms cloud-native PAM as a real category and gives Teleport multi-year runway.
  • 2024-09-04
    Fastest-growing modern PAM entrant by deal count
    Engineering-led adoption shows up in G2 and Reddit references as the cloud-native default.
  • 2025-06-12
    Identity Governance and Device Trust modules expand platform reach
Vendor Trust is scored independently of product quality. A great product from an unfair vendor still earns a low trust score.
Review Intelligence

What 480 reviews actually say

Synthesized from G2, Capterra, Reddit, Trustpilot. Patterns >15% prevalence shown.

Last synthesized
2026-04-29

Praise patterns

  • Developer ergonomics far ahead of legacy PAM
    87% ↑
  • Identity-aware proxy with short-lived certificates
    78% ↑
  • Single product covers SSH, Kubernetes, databases, web
    71% →
  • Cloud-native from inception
    64% →

Complaint patterns

  • Session recording shallower than CyberArk PSM
    47% →
  • Classical compliance auditors less familiar with architecture
    41% →
  • Single-product company; portfolio buyers prefer broader vendors
    38% →
  • Pricing opaque at enterprise tier
    31% →
Sentiment trend (6 months)
88/100 +2 pts
12
01
02
03
04
05
Patterns are extracted from review corpus and human-verified. We surface trends, not anecdotes.
Verified Pricing

What buyers actually pay

47 anonymized deal disclosures · last updated 2026-05-01

Contribute your deal price
Company size Median annual
100-500 employees $36,000
500-2,000 employees $132,000
2,000+ employees $360,000
Verified pricing is crowdsourced from buyers under anonymity guarantees. Vendor-listed prices are validated against actual deals quarterly.
Compliance & Security

Auto-verified certifications

Verified 2026-05-01
SOC 2 Type II
ISO 27001
HIPAA
GDPR
CCPA
PCI DSS
◐ FedRAMP In-Process

Editorial: Strengths

  • Identity-aware proxy issues short-lived certificates instead of long-lived secrets
  • Single product fronts SSH, Kubernetes, databases, RDP, and internal web apps
  • Developer ergonomics far ahead of legacy PAM
  • Strong open-source community edition with credible commercial path
  • Fastest-growing modern PAM entrant by revenue and deal count
  • Cloud-native architecture built post-2015, no on-prem legacy code

Editorial: Weaknesses

  • Session recording and replay shallower than CyberArk PSM
  • Classical compliance auditors less familiar with the architecture
  • Single-product company; portfolio buyers prefer broader vendors
  • Pricing opaque at the enterprise tier
  • Private company; no public financial transparency

Key features & integrations

  • +Identity-aware proxy for SSH, Kubernetes, databases, RDP, web apps
  • +Short-lived certificate issuance instead of long-lived secrets
  • +Just-in-time access workflows
  • +Session recording for SSH, Kubernetes exec, database queries
  • +Device Trust (cryptographic device attestation)
  • +Identity Governance (access reviews, certifications)
  • +Single sign-on with any OIDC / SAML identity provider
  • +API-first architecture; GitOps-friendly configuration
120+ integrations
KubernetesAWSAzureGCPOktaMicrosoft Entra IDGitHubGitLabPagerDutyDatadogSplunk
Geography supported
Global; strongest in US, EU
Best fit
50-10,000+ employees · Engineering-led organizations of any size
Editorial deep-dive

Read our full ranking of Privileged Access Management (PAM)

Teleport ranks #10 in our editorial review of 10 privileged access management (pam) platforms. The deep-dive covers methodology, comparison tables, decision matrix, migration scoring, and FAQs.

Read the full ranking

Closest alternatives in Privileged Access Management (PAM)

#9
Netwrix Privilege Secure
Acquisition-built breadth for buyers on the Netwrix data-security stack.
★ 4.3 opaque
#8
HashiCorp Vault
Developer-favored secrets management, now an IBM business.
★ 4.5 partial
#7
WALLIX Bastion
EU-native PAM with strong NIS2 and CSRD compliance fit.
★ 4.3 partial
Help the next buyer

Contribute your verified deal price

Pricing in B2B software is opaque because vendors want it that way. Verified buyer prices fix that, anonymously. Share what you actually paid for Teleport; we’ll add it to the verified pricing dataset on this page (with company size band only, no identifying details).

Submit anonymously