Skip to content
Z Zendikt
R
Code Review Software · Rank #2 of 10

Reviewable review and pricing

Thorough, reviewer-state-aware code review on top of GitHub.

By Reviewable · Founded 2015 · San Francisco, CA · private

Reviewable is the longest-running dedicated code review tool that layers on GitHub, founded 2015 by a former Google engineer who had worked on Mondrian, the internal Google review tool that inspired Gerrit. The product sits next to GitHub Pull Requests and provides stricter reviewer-state tracking (per-file disposition, multi-round review state, granular reviewer assignment) than GitHub native review still lacks in 2026. Strengths: deepest reviewer-state model on the market, defensible audit trails for regulated buyers, transparent flat per-active-reviewer pricing, and a quiet, focused product that has not chased AI marketing trends. Trade-offs: UI is functional rather than slick, no native stacked-PR support (Graphite is the right tool there), no AI review assist (intentional choice by the founder), and adoption is uneven because some teams find the per-file state model heavier than the GitHub native model.

Visit Reviewable Vendor pricing Compare to Graphite
Best for

Engineering teams where review depth and audit trails matter more than UI polish or speed. Particularly strong for regulated industries (financial services, healthcare, defense contractors on GitHub Enterprise) and teams that take a Google-style multi-round review process seriously.

Worst for

Teams shipping fast small changes (Graphite or native GitHub better), teams on GitLab or Bitbucket, buyers wanting AI review commentary, or teams that find GitHub native review already sufficient.

Vendor Trust Score

Is Reviewable a trustworthy vendor?

8.5/10
High trust
Pricing transparency
Published rates; no hidden fees
9.0
Contract fairness
Reasonable terms; no auto-renew traps
8.5
Incident response
How they handle outages and breaches
7.5
Post-acquisition behavior
Customer treatment after M&A or PE
8.5
Executive stability
Leadership churn over 24 months
9.0
Roadmap honesty
Public commitments held
8.5
Trust signal log
  • 2015-06-01
    Reviewable launched on GitHub
    Founder previously worked on Mondrian at Google; product positioned around stricter review state than GitHub native review.
  • 2023-05-15
    Stuck to no-AI roadmap through 2023-2025
    Founder publicly committed to depth over AI hype; some buyer signal that this slows adoption among AI-curious teams, but loyal customer base values it.
Vendor Trust is scored independently of product quality. A great product from an unfair vendor still earns a low trust score.
Review Intelligence

What 150 reviews actually say

Synthesized from G2, Capterra, Reddit, Trustpilot. Patterns >15% prevalence shown.

Last synthesized
2026-04-29

Praise patterns

  • Strictest reviewer-state model in the category
    87% →
  • Per-file disposition and multi-round review tracking
    78% →
  • Transparent flat per-reviewer pricing
    71% →
  • Defensible audit trails for regulated buyers
    64% →

Complaint patterns

  • UI is functional rather than visually modern
    51% →
  • No stacked-PR support
    47% →
  • No AI review assist (intentional)
    41% ↑
  • GitHub-only; no GitLab or Bitbucket
    38% →
Sentiment trend (6 months)
80/100 0 pts
12
01
02
03
04
05
Patterns are extracted from review corpus and human-verified. We surface trends, not anecdotes.
Verified Pricing

What buyers actually pay

96 anonymized deal disclosures · last updated 2026-05-01

Contribute your deal price
Company size Median annual
10 to 50 engineers (Team) $1,680
50 to 500 engineers (Team) $16,800
500+ engineers (Enterprise) $72,000
Verified pricing is crowdsourced from buyers under anonymity guarantees. Vendor-listed prices are validated against actual deals quarterly.
Compliance & Security

Auto-verified certifications

Verified 2026-05-01
SOC 2 Type II
ISO 27001
HIPAA
GDPR
CCPA
PCI DSS
FedRAMP

Editorial: Strengths

  • Longest-running dedicated review tool on GitHub (since 2015)
  • Strictest reviewer-state model in the category
  • Per-file disposition and multi-round review tracking
  • Defensible audit trails for regulated buyers
  • Transparent flat per-active-reviewer pricing
  • Quiet, focused product roadmap; no AI hype-cycle drift
  • Founder previously worked on Mondrian at Google

Editorial: Weaknesses

  • UI is functional rather than visually modern
  • No stacked-PR support (Graphite is the right tool there)
  • No AI review assist (intentional, but some buyers expect it)
  • GitHub-only; no GitLab, Bitbucket, or Azure DevOps
  • Per-file state model has a learning curve for some teams
  • Vendor footprint small; procurement pushback at large enterprises

Key features & integrations

  • +Strict reviewer-state model with per-file disposition
  • +Multi-round review tracking (history of revisions per file)
  • +Granular reviewer assignment per file or per path
  • +Defensible audit trail for regulated buyers
  • +GitHub Pull Request integration (PR-level coexistence)
  • +Status-check reporting back to GitHub
  • +SAML SSO and audit log at Enterprise
  • +REST API and webhooks
  • +Email and Slack notifications
  • +On-prem deployment at Enterprise
18+ integrations
GitHubSlackJiraEmailWebhooks
Geography supported
Global; strongest in US, UK, EU, Japan
Best fit
10 to 10,000 employees · Engineering teams that want strict review depth and audit trails on GitHub
Editorial deep-dive

Read our full ranking of Code Review Software

Reviewable ranks #2 in our editorial review of 10 code review software platforms. The deep-dive covers methodology, comparison tables, decision matrix, migration scoring, and FAQs.

Read the full ranking

Closest alternatives in Code Review Software

#1
Graphite
Modern stacked pull-request workflow for fast-shipping teams.
★ 4.7 public
#3
CodeRabbit
AI-powered code review with summary commentary and inline suggestions.
★ 4.6 public
#4
Atlassian Crucible
Long-standing enterprise code review, now cloud-only after Server EOL.
★ 4.0 partial
Help the next buyer

Contribute your verified deal price

Pricing in B2B software is opaque because vendors want it that way. Verified buyer prices fix that, anonymously. Share what you actually paid for Reviewable; we’ll add it to the verified pricing dataset on this page (with company size band only, no identifying details).

Submit anonymously