Skip to content
Z Zendikt
P
Compensation Management · Rank #4 of 10

Pequity

Modern total rewards platform with offer-letter integration.

By Pequity, Inc. · Founded 2020 · San Francisco, CA · private

Pequity is the modern total rewards platform with strong offer-letter integration, founded 2020 by ex-Coinbase compensation team members. The product covers compensation cycles + total rewards visualization + offer-letter automation + pay band design, anchored on candidate-facing total rewards experience and clean ATS integration. Strengths: best-in-category offer-letter automation (the strongest in category for candidate-facing comp), modern UX, founder pedigree (ex-Coinbase total rewards leadership), strong fit for tech-forward orgs prioritizing candidate experience, and clean ATS integration depth. Trade-offs: Narrower customer base than Pave (less benchmarking data depth, Pequity is built to consume external benchmarking sources rather than provide its own), planning workflow less mature than Pave, and brand recognition lower than Pave/Figures.

Visit Pequity Vendor pricing Compare to Beqom
Best for

Tech-forward mid-market companies (200-2,000 employees) prioritizing candidate-facing total rewards experience, offer-letter automation, and ATS integration depth.

Worst for

Buyers needing primary benchmarking source (Pave/Figures better fit), enterprise sales-comp-heavy (Beqom better), or pay equity-led compliance buyers (Compaas better).

Vendor Trust Score

Is Pequity a trustworthy vendor?

7.8/10
Mixed
Pricing transparency
Published rates; no hidden fees
6.5
Contract fairness
Reasonable terms; no auto-renew traps
8.0
Incident response
How they handle outages and breaches
7.5
Post-acquisition behavior
Customer treatment after M&A or PE
8.5
Executive stability
Leadership churn over 24 months
8.5
Roadmap honesty
Public commitments held
8.0
Trust signal log
  • 2022-09-14
    Series A raised; ex-Coinbase founders building modern total rewards
  • 2025-02-22
    Offer-letter automation expanded to support 12+ ATS integrations
Vendor Trust is scored independently of product quality. A great product from an unfair vendor still earns a low trust score.
Review Intelligence

What 180 reviews actually say

Synthesized from G2, Capterra, Reddit, Trustpilot. Patterns >15% prevalence shown.

Last synthesized
2026-04-29

Praise patterns

  • Best-in-category offer-letter automation
    87% ↑
  • Modern UX with candidate-facing experience
    78% →
  • Clean ATS integration
    64% →
  • Founder pedigree from Coinbase
    41% →

Complaint patterns

  • Smaller deployed base versus Pave
    47% →
  • Less benchmarking data depth
    41% →
  • Brand recognition lower than Pave
    38% →
  • Customer support variable
    31% →
Sentiment trend (6 months)
85/100 +1 pts
12
01
02
03
04
05
Representative voices

  • “Pequity makes our offer-letter process feel like the rest of our modern stack. Our candidate accept rate went up after switching from a PDF-based comp narrative.”

    Head of Talent, Series B SaaS· G2 · 2026-03-19

Patterns are extracted from review corpus and human-verified. We surface trends, not anecdotes.
Verified Pricing

What buyers actually pay

124 anonymized deal disclosures · last updated 2026-05-01

Contribute your deal price
Company size Median annual
50-200 employees $16,800
200-1,000 employees $84,000
1,000-2,000 employees $192,000
Verified pricing is crowdsourced from buyers under anonymity guarantees. Vendor-listed prices are validated against actual deals quarterly.
Compliance & Security

Auto-verified certifications

Verified 2026-05-01
SOC 2 Type II
ISO 27001
HIPAA
GDPR
CCPA
PCI DSS
FedRAMP

Editorial: Strengths

  • Best-in-category offer-letter automation
  • Modern UX with strong candidate-facing experience
  • Founder pedigree (ex-Coinbase total rewards)
  • Works for tech-forward orgs prioritizing candidate experience
  • Clean ATS integration depth
  • Pay band design and visualization features

Editorial: Weaknesses

  • Less penetration than Pave
  • Less benchmarking data depth (consumes external sources)
  • Planning workflow less mature than Pave
  • Brand recognition lower than Pave/Figures
  • Support depends on tier

Key features & integrations

  • +Offer-letter automation
  • +Total rewards portal
  • +Compensation cycles workflow
  • +Pay band design and visualization
  • +ATS integration (Greenhouse, Ashby, Lever)
  • +HRIS integration
  • +External benchmarking integration (Pave, Salary.com, Mercer)
  • +60+ integrations
60+ integrations
GreenhouseAshbyLeverWorkday HCMRipplingPaveSalary.com
Geography supported
Primarily US, growing EU
Best fit
200–2,000 employees · Tech-forward mid-market
Editorial deep-dive

Read our full ranking of Compensation Management

Pequity ranks #4 in our editorial review of 10 compensation management platforms. The deep-dive covers methodology, comparison tables, decision matrix, migration scoring, and FAQs.

Read the full ranking

Closest alternatives in Compensation Management

#3
Beqom
Enterprise total rewards + sales compensation depth.
★ 4.2 opaque
#5
Compaas
Pay equity-focused compensation specialist for compliance-driven orgs.
★ 4.5 opaque
#2
Figures
European modern compensation benchmarking with GDPR-first architecture.
★ 4.7 partial
Help the next buyer

Contribute your verified deal price

Pricing in B2B software is opaque because vendors want it that way. Verified buyer prices fix that, anonymously. Share what you actually paid for Pequity; we’ll add it to the verified pricing dataset on this page (with company size band only, no identifying details).

Submit anonymously